WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.200 align:middle line:90% 00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:07.641 align:middle line:84% The time having arrived to which the Senate had previously 00:00:07.641 --> 00:00:08.140 align:middle line:90% adjourned. 00:00:08.140 --> 00:00:09.550 align:middle line:90% The Senate will be in order. 00:00:09.550 --> 00:00:11.790 align:middle line:84% The Chair would ask members, staff, and guests 00:00:11.790 --> 00:00:15.970 align:middle line:84% to please rise and join the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr 00:00:15.970 --> 00:00:17.830 align:middle line:90% in the Pledge of Allegiance. 00:00:17.830 --> 00:00:21.110 align:middle line:84% I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United 00:00:21.110 --> 00:00:24.980 align:middle line:84% States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, 00:00:24.980 --> 00:00:29.090 align:middle line:84% one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty 00:00:29.090 --> 00:00:32.180 align:middle line:90% and justice for all. 00:00:32.180 --> 00:00:34.080 align:middle line:84% Several resolutions have been presented, 00:00:34.080 --> 00:00:36.000 align:middle line:90% which the clerk will read. 00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:39.230 align:middle line:84% By Ms. L'Italien, resolutions congratulating [INAUDIBLE] 00:00:39.230 --> 00:00:41.670 align:middle line:84% Anderson on the occasion of her retirement. 00:00:41.670 --> 00:00:44.580 align:middle line:84% By Senator Ross, resolutions congratulating 00:00:44.580 --> 00:00:51.160 align:middle line:84% Amelia Oh and Haley Bachman and Michelle Lee, [INAUDIBLE] 00:00:51.160 --> 00:00:54.280 align:middle line:84% Murphy, and Julia Park, all of the town of Wayland, 00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:57.100 align:middle line:84% on receiving the silver award of the Girl Scouts 00:00:57.100 --> 00:00:59.840 align:middle line:84% of America, and congratulating Eric P. [? 00:00:59.840 --> 00:01:01.360 align:middle line:90% O'Rourk ?] and Conner F. [? 00:01:01.360 --> 00:01:03.880 align:middle line:84% O'Rourk ?] of the town of Wrentham on their elevation 00:01:03.880 --> 00:01:05.174 align:middle line:90% to the rank of Eagle Scout. 00:01:05.174 --> 00:01:07.590 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on the adoption of the resolutions. 00:01:07.590 --> 00:01:09.090 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say, aye. 00:01:09.090 --> 00:01:10.300 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 00:01:10.300 --> 00:01:11.170 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 00:01:11.170 --> 00:01:13.300 align:middle line:90% And the resolutions are adopted. 00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:14.350 align:middle line:90% Papers from the House. 00:01:14.350 --> 00:01:15.890 align:middle line:84% Several House petitions come from the House 00:01:15.890 --> 00:01:17.400 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement [INAUDIBLE] has 00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:19.800 align:middle line:84% been suspended with [INAUDIBLE] and they've 00:01:19.800 --> 00:01:22.260 align:middle line:84% been referred to their various committees. 00:01:22.260 --> 00:01:25.010 align:middle line:84% The question comes on suspension of joint rule 12. 00:01:25.010 --> 00:01:26.580 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say, aye. 00:01:26.580 --> 00:01:27.720 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 00:01:27.720 --> 00:01:28.810 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 00:01:28.810 --> 00:01:29.990 align:middle line:90% And the rule is suspended. 00:01:29.990 --> 00:01:33.480 align:middle line:84% The petitions will be referred to their various committees. 00:01:33.480 --> 00:01:37.180 align:middle line:84% If there is no objection, we will proceed 00:01:37.180 --> 00:01:38.910 align:middle line:90% with the orders of the day. 00:01:38.910 --> 00:01:40.950 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 00:01:40.950 --> 00:01:43.090 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 00:01:43.090 --> 00:01:45.470 align:middle line:90% We will proceed. 00:01:45.470 --> 00:01:47.630 align:middle line:84% The only item on the calendar today 00:01:47.630 --> 00:01:51.160 align:middle line:84% is calendar item number 5, House Bill number 3601. 00:01:51.160 --> 00:01:54.110 align:middle line:84% The question will come on ordering the bill 00:01:54.110 --> 00:01:56.720 align:middle line:84% to a third reading, coming first on an amendment 00:01:56.720 --> 00:01:59.700 align:middle line:84% as recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means. 00:01:59.700 --> 00:02:04.060 align:middle line:84% A number of amendments have been filed 00:02:04.060 --> 00:02:08.759 align:middle line:84% which will be considered following the initial comments 00:02:08.759 --> 00:02:12.320 align:middle line:84% by the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr 00:02:12.320 --> 00:02:16.900 align:middle line:84% and to whom he directs his questions. 00:02:16.900 --> 00:02:17.960 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:02:17.960 --> 00:02:19.160 align:middle line:90% Well, well, Mr. President. 00:02:19.160 --> 00:02:20.090 align:middle line:90% Good morning. 00:02:20.090 --> 00:02:23.160 align:middle line:84% It is great to be gathered here with the members 00:02:23.160 --> 00:02:26.110 align:middle line:84% of the Senate on this beautiful spring day 00:02:26.110 --> 00:02:28.200 align:middle line:90% as the rain has cleared. 00:02:28.200 --> 00:02:29.460 align:middle line:90% The sun is out. 00:02:29.460 --> 00:02:31.650 align:middle line:84% And here in the light of day, we are 00:02:31.650 --> 00:02:36.810 align:middle line:84% to debate how to spend billions of dollars of tax money. 00:02:36.810 --> 00:02:42.220 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I look forward to a robust and productive debate. 00:02:42.220 --> 00:02:48.060 align:middle line:84% I want to compliment you on yet another outstanding purple tie. 00:02:48.060 --> 00:02:51.410 align:middle line:84% It is radiant from the rostrum, Mr. President. 00:02:51.410 --> 00:02:54.690 align:middle line:84% And it certainly sets an example of haberdashery 00:02:54.690 --> 00:02:56.530 align:middle line:90% for all in the chamber. 00:02:56.530 --> 00:03:02.440 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, we have before us a very serious task, 00:03:02.440 --> 00:03:03.670 align:middle line:90% Mr. President. 00:03:03.670 --> 00:03:06.450 align:middle line:84% And that relates to trying to put together 00:03:06.450 --> 00:03:09.840 align:middle line:84% a budget that addresses the fiscal priorities that we all 00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:12.180 align:middle line:84% share and that the people of the Commonwealth have. 00:03:12.180 --> 00:03:15.890 align:middle line:84% But also, Mr. President, to recognize the fiscal reality 00:03:15.890 --> 00:03:19.030 align:middle line:84% that we live in, and that we'll likely 00:03:19.030 --> 00:03:22.310 align:middle line:84% be dealing with in terms of uncertainty of revenues 00:03:22.310 --> 00:03:24.420 align:middle line:90% for some period of time. 00:03:24.420 --> 00:03:28.310 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I do have a series 00:03:28.310 --> 00:03:31.290 align:middle line:84% of questions for our distinguished Chair 00:03:31.290 --> 00:03:33.170 align:middle line:84% Lady of the Committee on Ways and Means. 00:03:33.170 --> 00:03:36.370 align:middle line:84% And I would compliment her on the work that she and her staff 00:03:36.370 --> 00:03:39.720 align:middle line:84% have done to compile this budget and respond 00:03:39.720 --> 00:03:41.680 align:middle line:90% to a number of those priorities. 00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:43.670 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we do have a number 00:03:43.670 --> 00:03:46.190 align:middle line:84% of questions about the internal balance 00:03:46.190 --> 00:03:48.470 align:middle line:90% of this particular document. 00:03:48.470 --> 00:03:53.360 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, before I get to those questions, 00:03:53.360 --> 00:03:56.960 align:middle line:84% I hope to resolve a particular matter 00:03:56.960 --> 00:03:58.540 align:middle line:90% at the outset of this debate. 00:03:58.540 --> 00:04:03.600 align:middle line:84% And so Mr. President, I am reluctant to interrupt 00:04:03.600 --> 00:04:06.740 align:middle line:84% your conversation with the distinguished majority leader, 00:04:06.740 --> 00:04:11.580 align:middle line:84% but I do rise to raise a point of parliamentary inquiry. 00:04:11.580 --> 00:04:14.080 align:middle line:84% The gentleman will state his point of parliamentary inquiry. 00:04:14.080 --> 00:04:17.640 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, is the budget a money bill? 00:04:17.640 --> 00:04:19.970 align:middle line:84% The budget is indeed a money bill. 00:04:19.970 --> 00:04:22.600 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, it makes me so happy when you say that. 00:04:22.600 --> 00:04:23.760 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 00:04:23.760 --> 00:04:26.990 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, so a few questions, and I 00:04:26.990 --> 00:04:30.490 align:middle line:84% think the best way to do this would be to go a few at a time 00:04:30.490 --> 00:04:33.650 align:middle line:84% so as not to overwhelm the Chair of Ways and Means, 00:04:33.650 --> 00:04:35.420 align:middle line:84% and also so that we can all fully 00:04:35.420 --> 00:04:39.290 align:middle line:84% appreciate the answers to the questions, Mr. President. 00:04:39.290 --> 00:04:43.680 align:middle line:84% But again, let me start with the first few. 00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:46.990 align:middle line:84% First of all, Mr. President, current estimates 00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:51.380 align:middle line:84% indicate that in fiscal year 2017 00:04:51.380 --> 00:04:55.970 align:middle line:84% we are somewhere in the neighborhood of $462 million 00:04:55.970 --> 00:05:00.230 align:middle line:84% below the established benchmark for revenue collection. 00:05:00.230 --> 00:05:04.700 align:middle line:84% So does this budget address that reality 00:05:04.700 --> 00:05:06.720 align:middle line:90% and take recognition of it? 00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:08.980 align:middle line:84% In addition to that, Mr. President, 00:05:08.980 --> 00:05:11.270 align:middle line:84% we've heard as the budget has come 00:05:11.270 --> 00:05:13.360 align:middle line:84% through its developmental process 00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:17.260 align:middle line:84% that there may well be a structural deficit that 00:05:17.260 --> 00:05:20.560 align:middle line:84% needs to be addressed even before we try 00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:23.690 align:middle line:84% to take into account the under-performance of revenue 00:05:23.690 --> 00:05:24.590 align:middle line:90% collection. 00:05:24.590 --> 00:05:27.330 align:middle line:84% And in addition to that, Mr. President, 00:05:27.330 --> 00:05:31.120 align:middle line:84% we often resort in this chamber and in this building 00:05:31.120 --> 00:05:35.230 align:middle line:84% to supplemental budgets to try to address underfunded accounts 00:05:35.230 --> 00:05:38.020 align:middle line:84% and to try to make corrections to things we have done 00:05:38.020 --> 00:05:40.060 align:middle line:90% in general Appropriations Act. 00:05:40.060 --> 00:05:44.150 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I'm hoping that we can get clarification 00:05:44.150 --> 00:05:48.000 align:middle line:84% on how many supplemental budgets we have had to do 00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:51.940 align:middle line:90% so far in fiscal year 2017. 00:05:51.940 --> 00:05:54.950 align:middle line:84% And with that, Mr. President, I look forward 00:05:54.950 --> 00:05:56.810 align:middle line:84% to the answers of the distinguished Chair 00:05:56.810 --> 00:05:57.560 align:middle line:90% of Ways and Means. 00:05:57.560 --> 00:06:00.400 align:middle line:84% And again, as she prepares to rise, 00:06:00.400 --> 00:06:03.320 align:middle line:84% I want to thank her for the tremendous amount of work 00:06:03.320 --> 00:06:07.110 align:middle line:84% that's been done to get us to this point. 00:06:07.110 --> 00:06:11.400 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka. 00:06:11.400 --> 00:06:12.930 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:06:12.930 --> 00:06:15.250 align:middle line:84% And thanks to the minority leader 00:06:15.250 --> 00:06:17.730 align:middle line:90% for asking some great questions. 00:06:17.730 --> 00:06:21.970 align:middle line:84% I'm honored to begin debate today on my third budget 00:06:21.970 --> 00:06:24.940 align:middle line:84% as Chair of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means. 00:06:24.940 --> 00:06:28.860 align:middle line:84% This has been a truly collaborative process, 00:06:28.860 --> 00:06:32.980 align:middle line:84% bringing in ideas and priorities of the committee 00:06:32.980 --> 00:06:36.870 align:middle line:84% and of my Senate colleagues by meeting with all of you, 00:06:36.870 --> 00:06:40.320 align:middle line:84% input from state agencies and advocates 00:06:40.320 --> 00:06:43.360 align:middle line:84% in the expertise of so many organizations 00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:45.840 align:middle line:84% throughout the state, constituents 00:06:45.840 --> 00:06:48.280 align:middle line:84% across the Commonwealth who have met with me, 00:06:48.280 --> 00:06:52.640 align:middle line:84% met with all of you, the wonderful Commonwealth 00:06:52.640 --> 00:06:54.510 align:middle line:90% conversations. 00:06:54.510 --> 00:06:57.480 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, for your leadership, 00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:00.560 align:middle line:84% especially through these tough fiscal times. 00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:02.100 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 00:07:02.100 --> 00:07:05.340 align:middle line:84% And thank you to my Vice Chair, the senator 00:07:05.340 --> 00:07:09.580 align:middle line:84% from Everett, my Assistant Vice Chair, the senator 00:07:09.580 --> 00:07:13.530 align:middle line:84% from Sommerville, ranking minority member, 00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:18.000 align:middle line:84% the senator from Plymouth, and all of the terrific members 00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:19.360 align:middle line:90% of the Committee. 00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:23.880 align:middle line:84% And thank you again to all of the senators 00:07:23.880 --> 00:07:27.090 align:middle line:84% for your wonderful input, your caring, your advice, 00:07:27.090 --> 00:07:29.230 align:middle line:90% and counsel. 00:07:29.230 --> 00:07:31.140 align:middle line:84% For the third year in a row, we hope 00:07:31.140 --> 00:07:36.010 align:middle line:84% to engage the public in the Senate budget process. 00:07:36.010 --> 00:07:41.910 align:middle line:84% We have viewing areas open to the general public in room 428 00:07:41.910 --> 00:07:46.140 align:middle line:84% and by the Walcott statue on the third floor. 00:07:46.140 --> 00:07:51.580 align:middle line:84% We are live streaming this debate and live tweeting. 00:07:51.580 --> 00:07:54.790 align:middle line:84% So everybody should partake in that. 00:07:54.790 --> 00:07:59.950 align:middle line:84% We want this process to be accessible and available 00:07:59.950 --> 00:08:02.840 align:middle line:90% to everyone. 00:08:02.840 --> 00:08:07.140 align:middle line:84% The fiscal year 2018 budget we are debating this week 00:08:07.140 --> 00:08:11.610 align:middle line:84% focuses on the theme of sustaining our Commonwealth. 00:08:11.610 --> 00:08:18.500 align:middle line:84% We recognize the constraints as mentioned, the uncertain times, 00:08:18.500 --> 00:08:24.380 align:middle line:84% the slow revenue growth, and our current unsteady fiscal 00:08:24.380 --> 00:08:25.830 align:middle line:90% environment. 00:08:25.830 --> 00:08:30.260 align:middle line:84% It is in these uncertain times, it's 00:08:30.260 --> 00:08:34.260 align:middle line:84% now more important than ever, for us 00:08:34.260 --> 00:08:37.210 align:middle line:84% to take care of each other and work 00:08:37.210 --> 00:08:40.980 align:middle line:84% to provide opportunities for all of our people 00:08:40.980 --> 00:08:44.140 align:middle line:84% in all areas of the Commonwealth. 00:08:44.140 --> 00:08:48.420 align:middle line:84% The cover art-- and I do want to raise it 00:08:48.420 --> 00:08:51.350 align:middle line:90% because its a beautiful cover. 00:08:51.350 --> 00:08:53.260 align:middle line:90% It's art. 00:08:53.260 --> 00:08:59.200 align:middle line:84% And it reflects our theme of sustaining our Commonwealth. 00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:02.590 align:middle line:84% These beautiful images on the cover 00:09:02.590 --> 00:09:05.950 align:middle line:84% were created by Massachusetts artists 00:09:05.950 --> 00:09:08.820 align:middle line:84% working with an organization called 00:09:08.820 --> 00:09:13.710 align:middle line:84% Art Lifting, a local organization that empowers 00:09:13.710 --> 00:09:18.830 align:middle line:84% artists across the country impacted by homelessness, 00:09:18.830 --> 00:09:23.750 align:middle line:84% having disabilities, addiction, or other challenges. 00:09:23.750 --> 00:09:27.790 align:middle line:84% And they are lifting themselves through the celebration 00:09:27.790 --> 00:09:30.500 align:middle line:90% and sale of their art work. 00:09:30.500 --> 00:09:33.410 align:middle line:90% So that is very notable. 00:09:33.410 --> 00:09:37.340 align:middle line:84% We can lift up and sustain our Commonwealth 00:09:37.340 --> 00:09:39.460 align:middle line:84% by focusing on the fundamentals-- 00:09:39.460 --> 00:09:42.580 align:middle line:90% 00:09:42.580 --> 00:09:47.290 align:middle line:84% education, health and human services, the well-being 00:09:47.290 --> 00:09:51.710 align:middle line:90% of our residents, housing. 00:09:51.710 --> 00:09:54.950 align:middle line:84% This budget reflects our shared values 00:09:54.950 --> 00:10:01.970 align:middle line:84% and our shared responsibility to foster our common good. 00:10:01.970 --> 00:10:05.080 align:middle line:84% The Senate Ways and Means fiscal '18 budget 00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:11.770 align:middle line:84% includes for $40.79 billion in total net spending. 00:10:11.770 --> 00:10:15.820 align:middle line:84% This is a balanced and fiscally responsible budget. 00:10:15.820 --> 00:10:21.690 align:middle line:84% We continue to reduce our reliance on one time revenues 00:10:21.690 --> 00:10:26.820 align:middle line:84% and direct $98.4 million to the stabilization fund 00:10:26.820 --> 00:10:32.410 align:middle line:84% to continue to build up this very important safety net. 00:10:32.410 --> 00:10:35.060 align:middle line:90% This has been a Senate priority. 00:10:35.060 --> 00:10:37.270 align:middle line:84% We also include several initiatives 00:10:37.270 --> 00:10:42.030 align:middle line:84% to maximize state and federal revenue opportunities 00:10:42.030 --> 00:10:48.480 align:middle line:84% and spend efficiently, including a standing tax expenditure 00:10:48.480 --> 00:10:53.220 align:middle line:84% review commission to evaluate all of the state's tax 00:10:53.220 --> 00:10:57.880 align:middle line:84% expenditures and their fiscal impact. 00:10:57.880 --> 00:11:02.360 align:middle line:84% In line with the Kids First framework to invest 00:11:02.360 --> 00:11:07.560 align:middle line:84% in our kids, this budget directs funding to high quality 00:11:07.560 --> 00:11:13.730 align:middle line:84% education for everyone, including a bold $15.1 million 00:11:13.730 --> 00:11:18.650 align:middle line:84% investment to expand access to preschool for low income 00:11:18.650 --> 00:11:24.870 align:middle line:84% four-year-olds, $4.76 billion for Chapter 70 education 00:11:24.870 --> 00:11:27.050 align:middle line:90% funding including-- 00:11:27.050 --> 00:11:29.380 align:middle line:90% and this is really important. 00:11:29.380 --> 00:11:30.930 align:middle line:90% We've heard from all of you. 00:11:30.930 --> 00:11:33.350 align:middle line:84% And we've all heard from our constituents-- 00:11:33.350 --> 00:11:37.190 align:middle line:84% continued implementation of the Foundation Budget Review 00:11:37.190 --> 00:11:39.360 align:middle line:90% Commission's recommendations. 00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:41.010 align:middle line:90% We go farther. 00:11:41.010 --> 00:11:46.780 align:middle line:84% We have $545.1 million for community colleges 00:11:46.780 --> 00:11:53.530 align:middle line:84% and universities and $534.5 million for U Mass. 00:11:53.530 --> 00:11:57.540 align:middle line:84% The budget also take steps to contain health care costs 00:11:57.540 --> 00:12:00.660 align:middle line:84% and invest in health and human services, 00:12:00.660 --> 00:12:03.790 align:middle line:84% with a strong focus on mental health. 00:12:03.790 --> 00:12:08.460 align:middle line:84% We have $143 million for substance abuse treatment, 00:12:08.460 --> 00:12:15.060 align:middle line:84% intervention, and recovery support services, $91.4 million 00:12:15.060 --> 00:12:21.190 align:middle line:84% for mental health services for young people, $24.2 million 00:12:21.190 --> 00:12:28.200 align:middle line:84% to fully fund the DDS Turning 22 item, $3.5 million 00:12:28.200 --> 00:12:31.930 align:middle line:84% to encourage collaboration among agencies schools 00:12:31.930 --> 00:12:36.200 align:middle line:84% and community partners to strengthen early detection 00:12:36.200 --> 00:12:40.680 align:middle line:84% and screening of mental illness in our children, 00:12:40.680 --> 00:12:45.210 align:middle line:84% and $2.6 million for pediatric palliative care 00:12:45.210 --> 00:12:47.580 align:middle line:90% to eliminate the waiting list. 00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:50.730 align:middle line:84% This has also been a Senate priority 00:12:50.730 --> 00:12:54.130 align:middle line:84% to eliminate the waiting list for services 00:12:54.130 --> 00:12:58.900 align:middle line:84% for terminally ill children and their families. 00:12:58.900 --> 00:13:02.510 align:middle line:84% We also continue our support for those who need our help, 00:13:02.510 --> 00:13:08.430 align:middle line:84% including children, seniors, folks with disabilities, 00:13:08.430 --> 00:13:10.550 align:middle line:90% and our veterans. 00:13:10.550 --> 00:13:14.380 align:middle line:84% This budget also includes significant support 00:13:14.380 --> 00:13:17.330 align:middle line:84% for housing and homelessness prevention, 00:13:17.330 --> 00:13:21.350 align:middle line:84% focusing on preventative and supportive resources 00:13:21.350 --> 00:13:25.360 align:middle line:84% to connect people with all different levels of housing 00:13:25.360 --> 00:13:29.620 align:middle line:84% and have it be affordable, stable housing 00:13:29.620 --> 00:13:34.120 align:middle line:84% as well as offering assistance to those 00:13:34.120 --> 00:13:37.060 align:middle line:90% that are in housing crisis. 00:13:37.060 --> 00:13:43.060 align:middle line:84% We have $464.1 million in total for the full spectrum 00:13:43.060 --> 00:13:44.440 align:middle line:90% of housing services. 00:13:44.440 --> 00:13:49.130 align:middle line:84% And I'll just give a few highlights, $165.9 million 00:13:49.130 --> 00:13:52.690 align:middle line:84% for EA family shelters, $100 million 00:13:52.690 --> 00:13:58.780 align:middle line:84% for the MRVP to allow 350 to 400 new rental vouchers, 00:13:58.780 --> 00:14:03.880 align:middle line:84% $46.2 million for homeless individual assistance, 00:14:03.880 --> 00:14:11.340 align:middle line:84% $18.5 for RAFT, and $2.5 million for Unaccompanied Homeless 00:14:11.340 --> 00:14:12.510 align:middle line:90% Youth Services. 00:14:12.510 --> 00:14:15.710 align:middle line:84% For some, it's the highest it's been. 00:14:15.710 --> 00:14:20.600 align:middle line:84% We target also investments to promote self-sufficiency 00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:23.400 align:middle line:84% among low income families to create 00:14:23.400 --> 00:14:26.870 align:middle line:84% opportunities to truly once again help 00:14:26.870 --> 00:14:29.690 align:middle line:90% sustain our Commonwealth. 00:14:29.690 --> 00:14:34.340 align:middle line:84% So we have $30 million, for example, for Adult Basic 00:14:34.340 --> 00:14:39.900 align:middle line:84% Education Services, $14.6 for the Department of Transitional 00:14:39.900 --> 00:14:46.400 align:middle line:84% Assistance Employment Services program, $12.5 for summer jobs 00:14:46.400 --> 00:14:51.720 align:middle line:84% and work readiness training for at-risk youth, $4 million 00:14:51.720 --> 00:14:55.070 align:middle line:84% for the Workforce Competitiveness Trust Fund. 00:14:55.070 --> 00:14:57.600 align:middle line:84% And for the third year in a row, we 00:14:57.600 --> 00:15:00.270 align:middle line:84% should be proud we have increased the children's 00:15:00.270 --> 00:15:03.640 align:middle line:84% clothing allowance for low income families 00:15:03.640 --> 00:15:07.720 align:middle line:84% to $300 per child, allowing children 00:15:07.720 --> 00:15:12.760 align:middle line:84% to enter school, start their school year with new clothes 00:15:12.760 --> 00:15:14.350 align:middle line:90% that all kids want. 00:15:14.350 --> 00:15:19.750 align:middle line:84% And as we've noted, children at these ages grow like sprouts. 00:15:19.750 --> 00:15:22.020 align:middle line:90% They need sometimes new clothes. 00:15:22.020 --> 00:15:25.300 align:middle line:90% And this will help them. 00:15:25.300 --> 00:15:27.710 align:middle line:84% These are only some of the highlights 00:15:27.710 --> 00:15:30.270 align:middle line:84% of the targeted investments in this budget 00:15:30.270 --> 00:15:35.160 align:middle line:84% to foster shared prosperity and support our children, families, 00:15:35.160 --> 00:15:36.530 align:middle line:90% and communities. 00:15:36.530 --> 00:15:41.580 align:middle line:84% As Horace Mann, the education leader, former Massachusetts 00:15:41.580 --> 00:15:45.470 align:middle line:84% state president, and native of Franklin which 00:15:45.470 --> 00:15:48.120 align:middle line:84% I am proud to say is in my district, 00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:53.060 align:middle line:84% once said "Doing nothing for others 00:15:53.060 --> 00:15:56.550 align:middle line:90% is the undoing of ourselves." 00:15:56.550 --> 00:16:01.160 align:middle line:84% So this budget invests in children and their education, 00:16:01.160 --> 00:16:05.930 align:middle line:84% the best investment that we can make in our future. 00:16:05.930 --> 00:16:08.840 align:middle line:84% We invest in the health, the well-being of our people 00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:10.090 align:middle line:90% and our families. 00:16:10.090 --> 00:16:12.920 align:middle line:84% We invest in the support services 00:16:12.920 --> 00:16:16.730 align:middle line:84% low income people need to find solid ground, 00:16:16.730 --> 00:16:20.880 align:middle line:84% secure housing, health, and get back to work. 00:16:20.880 --> 00:16:25.010 align:middle line:84% We are clear eyed about our current financial situation, 00:16:25.010 --> 00:16:29.780 align:middle line:84% but I am proud to say that this budget reflects all-- 00:16:29.780 --> 00:16:32.270 align:middle line:90% and I really emphasize all-- 00:16:32.270 --> 00:16:38.620 align:middle line:84% of our values and invests in our future. 00:16:38.620 --> 00:16:40.820 align:middle line:84% I look forward to this week's debate 00:16:40.820 --> 00:16:44.210 align:middle line:84% as I know that there are many amendments 00:16:44.210 --> 00:16:47.870 align:middle line:84% and this debate will make this budget even stronger. 00:16:47.870 --> 00:16:52.120 align:middle line:84% I'm confident that after a spirited debate 00:16:52.120 --> 00:16:56.510 align:middle line:84% here in the Senate that we will end our budget debate even 00:16:56.510 --> 00:17:00.010 align:middle line:84% prouder that we have taken action 00:17:00.010 --> 00:17:04.400 align:middle line:84% to sustain the fundamentals of our Commonwealth 00:17:04.400 --> 00:17:07.970 align:middle line:84% and continue to build future success. 00:17:07.970 --> 00:17:08.640 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:17:08.640 --> 00:17:11.980 align:middle line:90% 00:17:11.980 --> 00:17:19.540 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Suffolk, Mr. Di Domenico 00:17:19.540 --> 00:17:22.990 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, I wanted 00:17:22.990 --> 00:17:25.430 align:middle line:84% to publicly thank the Chair of Ways and Means 00:17:25.430 --> 00:17:28.480 align:middle line:84% and our president for their strong commitment 00:17:28.480 --> 00:17:30.670 align:middle line:84% to children and families in this budget. 00:17:30.670 --> 00:17:34.640 align:middle line:84% As the Senate president made it known to all a couple of years 00:17:34.640 --> 00:17:38.900 align:middle line:84% ago, kids would be a first priority in this chamber, 00:17:38.900 --> 00:17:42.210 align:middle line:84% for many of us and for the body as a whole. 00:17:42.210 --> 00:17:46.400 align:middle line:84% And our Chair has taken that lead and she has, 00:17:46.400 --> 00:17:50.170 align:middle line:84% as you can see in the budget books, taking that to heart. 00:17:50.170 --> 00:17:53.220 align:middle line:84% And our kids definitely come first. 00:17:53.220 --> 00:17:55.250 align:middle line:84% You know, we talk about early education. 00:17:55.250 --> 00:17:56.490 align:middle line:90% We talk about child supports. 00:17:56.490 --> 00:17:59.800 align:middle line:84% We talk about housing, mental health, public health. 00:17:59.800 --> 00:18:02.010 align:middle line:84% And we talk a lot about these issues 00:18:02.010 --> 00:18:04.900 align:middle line:84% in our offices and appointments and our district. 00:18:04.900 --> 00:18:07.010 align:middle line:84% And a lot of times that talk doesn't always 00:18:07.010 --> 00:18:09.980 align:middle line:84% transfer to the budget or transfer to legislation. 00:18:09.980 --> 00:18:12.080 align:middle line:84% And I can tell you without a doubt, 00:18:12.080 --> 00:18:14.890 align:middle line:84% our Chair has done more than we could have expected 00:18:14.890 --> 00:18:17.430 align:middle line:84% in these trying times financially 00:18:17.430 --> 00:18:19.770 align:middle line:90% for our kids and our families. 00:18:19.770 --> 00:18:21.780 align:middle line:84% We have made a commitment in this chamber 00:18:21.780 --> 00:18:26.000 align:middle line:84% to put our kids above all and our families above all. 00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:28.620 align:middle line:84% And if you look at our budget and see that commitment 00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:31.680 align:middle line:84% in terms of financial increases, you 00:18:31.680 --> 00:18:33.370 align:middle line:90% can see that we made that clear. 00:18:33.370 --> 00:18:36.210 align:middle line:84% We always talk about putting our kids first, 00:18:36.210 --> 00:18:41.550 align:middle line:84% and we always talk about when our children have challenges. 00:18:41.550 --> 00:18:44.510 align:middle line:84% We always want to put them in a spot 00:18:44.510 --> 00:18:46.830 align:middle line:84% to succeed, to advance themselves, become 00:18:46.830 --> 00:18:48.670 align:middle line:90% better people in society. 00:18:48.670 --> 00:18:51.410 align:middle line:84% And we talk about all the great things 00:18:51.410 --> 00:18:53.530 align:middle line:90% we do in our education system. 00:18:53.530 --> 00:18:55.890 align:middle line:84% But if a child comes to school hungry, 00:18:55.890 --> 00:18:58.590 align:middle line:84% has an unstable housing situation, 00:18:58.590 --> 00:19:02.570 align:middle line:84% has trauma back at home, you can have the best schools, the best 00:19:02.570 --> 00:19:07.260 align:middle line:84% technology, the best educators, and that child will not learn. 00:19:07.260 --> 00:19:10.410 align:middle line:84% We have addressed that issue in this budget through our Chair, 00:19:10.410 --> 00:19:12.120 align:middle line:84% and through a lot of your priorities 00:19:12.120 --> 00:19:14.740 align:middle line:84% as well, to put our kids in a place 00:19:14.740 --> 00:19:16.820 align:middle line:84% where they can succeed in academic 00:19:16.820 --> 00:19:19.200 align:middle line:90% and also in our communities. 00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:21.040 align:middle line:84% So I want to thank our Chair publicly, 00:19:21.040 --> 00:19:23.859 align:middle line:84% and I can't thank her enough for doing what she has done. 00:19:23.859 --> 00:19:26.400 align:middle line:84% And I do want to touch on two things that she mentioned, too. 00:19:26.400 --> 00:19:29.330 align:middle line:84% Because she is a leader on these two issues. 00:19:29.330 --> 00:19:31.340 align:middle line:84% And the Senate has become the place 00:19:31.340 --> 00:19:34.740 align:middle line:84% to be when it comes to clothing allowance for our children, 00:19:34.740 --> 00:19:37.870 align:middle line:90% and pediatric palliative care. 00:19:37.870 --> 00:19:41.110 align:middle line:84% Those of us who have children, who have grandchildren, nieces 00:19:41.110 --> 00:19:44.360 align:middle line:84% and nephews can't even imagine what these families 00:19:44.360 --> 00:19:46.830 align:middle line:84% are going through to recieve pediatric palliative care 00:19:46.830 --> 00:19:48.430 align:middle line:90% services. 00:19:48.430 --> 00:19:51.070 align:middle line:84% And this budget clears the waiting list. 00:19:51.070 --> 00:19:54.640 align:middle line:84% 165 families were on the waiting list prior to this budget. 00:19:54.640 --> 00:19:58.820 align:middle line:84% That is actually a shame, that families 00:19:58.820 --> 00:20:00.780 align:middle line:84% would have to wait on a waiting list 00:20:00.780 --> 00:20:03.780 align:middle line:84% to get pediatric palliative services for end 00:20:03.780 --> 00:20:05.880 align:middle line:84% of life services and life limiting 00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:07.350 align:middle line:90% services for their children. 00:20:07.350 --> 00:20:10.700 align:middle line:84% We can't even imagine that but these families, 00:20:10.700 --> 00:20:13.330 align:middle line:84% their whole world has come crashing down on them. 00:20:13.330 --> 00:20:17.520 align:middle line:84% And the little bit of investment in whole terms of this budget, 00:20:17.520 --> 00:20:21.050 align:middle line:84% $2.6 million in a $40 billion budget, 00:20:21.050 --> 00:20:23.120 align:middle line:84% goes a long way to helping these families 00:20:23.120 --> 00:20:25.590 align:middle line:84% and helping them deal with situations that will come down 00:20:25.590 --> 00:20:28.120 align:middle line:84% the road for them, for their siblings and their parents. 00:20:28.120 --> 00:20:30.620 align:middle line:84% So I want to thank the Senate president for all of his work, 00:20:30.620 --> 00:20:34.570 align:middle line:84% and the Chair of the Ways and Means staff, my staff, and all 00:20:34.570 --> 00:20:36.164 align:middle line:84% of our staffs for all they've done 00:20:36.164 --> 00:20:38.330 align:middle line:84% to put this budget together and put us in a position 00:20:38.330 --> 00:20:40.020 align:middle line:84% today to do both things for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 00:20:40.020 --> 00:20:42.010 align:middle line:84% So I look forward to a great week, 00:20:42.010 --> 00:20:43.584 align:middle line:84% and making our budget even stronger 00:20:43.584 --> 00:20:44.750 align:middle line:90% as the process goes forward. 00:20:44.750 --> 00:20:47.140 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:20:47.140 --> 00:20:48.030 align:middle line:90% Mr. Tarr. 00:20:48.030 --> 00:20:49.200 align:middle line:90% Mr. President, I apologize. 00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:53.070 align:middle line:84% I was remiss in not inviting the Chair and the Vice Chair's 00:20:53.070 --> 00:20:54.300 align:middle line:90% opening remarks. 00:20:54.300 --> 00:20:56.800 align:middle line:84% But I still have some questions, Mr. President. 00:20:56.800 --> 00:20:59.260 align:middle line:84% And in fact, those questions are I 00:20:59.260 --> 00:21:02.280 align:middle line:84% think more important now than ever particularly 00:21:02.280 --> 00:21:05.530 align:middle line:84% because, Mr. President, the Chair and the Vice Chair 00:21:05.530 --> 00:21:09.700 align:middle line:84% have highlighted one important dimension of the budget. 00:21:09.700 --> 00:21:12.060 align:middle line:84% And that is making sure that we respond 00:21:12.060 --> 00:21:14.760 align:middle line:90% to important fiscal priorities. 00:21:14.760 --> 00:21:16.780 align:middle line:84% And one of the things, Mr. President, 00:21:16.780 --> 00:21:19.180 align:middle line:84% that was not touched on as much as I think 00:21:19.180 --> 00:21:21.540 align:middle line:84% could be at this point is the notion 00:21:21.540 --> 00:21:25.560 align:middle line:84% that in this budget as well we see some progress 00:21:25.560 --> 00:21:28.970 align:middle line:84% on funding the recommendations of the Foundation Budget Review 00:21:28.970 --> 00:21:31.700 align:middle line:84% Commission, which members in this chamber 00:21:31.700 --> 00:21:34.170 align:middle line:90% fought to reconstitute. 00:21:34.170 --> 00:21:39.000 align:middle line:84% And particularly, Mr. President, thanks 00:21:39.000 --> 00:21:41.480 align:middle line:84% go to the distinguished Chair Lady of the Committee 00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:45.040 align:middle line:84% on Education, and everyone in this chamber for saying 00:21:45.040 --> 00:21:50.600 align:middle line:84% that we need to consider how far the discrepancy is between what 00:21:50.600 --> 00:21:54.550 align:middle line:84% we mandate for education to be provided in K through 12 00:21:54.550 --> 00:21:58.610 align:middle line:84% systems across the Commonwealth, and what we provide 00:21:58.610 --> 00:22:02.270 align:middle line:84% and require to be provided through the Foundation budget. 00:22:02.270 --> 00:22:04.630 align:middle line:84% And for the first time, Mr. President, 00:22:04.630 --> 00:22:07.680 align:middle line:84% we see an earnest attempt in this budget 00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:11.380 align:middle line:84% to be able to respond to that, Mr. President. 00:22:11.380 --> 00:22:13.360 align:middle line:90% Because those are real needs. 00:22:13.360 --> 00:22:17.150 align:middle line:84% And those are commitments that we have already made. 00:22:17.150 --> 00:22:19.470 align:middle line:90% And we need to stand by them. 00:22:19.470 --> 00:22:21.510 align:middle line:90% And we need to support them. 00:22:21.510 --> 00:22:25.080 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, the other dimension of a budget 00:22:25.080 --> 00:22:28.980 align:middle line:84% is also trying to make sure that we are fiscally balanced 00:22:28.980 --> 00:22:32.220 align:middle line:84% and we consider the reality that the distinguished Chair 00:22:32.220 --> 00:22:34.440 align:middle line:84% Lady of Ways and Means has already made reference to 00:22:34.440 --> 00:22:37.020 align:middle line:84% but deserves, in my humble opinion, 00:22:37.020 --> 00:22:38.680 align:middle line:90% some further consideration. 00:22:38.680 --> 00:22:42.630 align:middle line:84% And thus, Mr. President, some questions relative to that. 00:22:42.630 --> 00:22:45.140 align:middle line:84% The first being that we all know-- 00:22:45.140 --> 00:22:49.000 align:middle line:84% and we can't ignore just because we came into the chamber 00:22:49.000 --> 00:22:50.920 align:middle line:84% and it is time to debate the budget-- 00:22:50.920 --> 00:22:54.240 align:middle line:84% what's happening with regard to revenue collections, Mr. 00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:57.830 align:middle line:84% President, that are underperforming benchmark 00:22:57.830 --> 00:23:01.720 align:middle line:90% by about $462 million. 00:23:01.720 --> 00:23:05.020 align:middle line:84% And so it's a logical question to ask 00:23:05.020 --> 00:23:08.800 align:middle line:84% as we gather to begin to plot our course collectively 00:23:08.800 --> 00:23:12.070 align:middle line:84% for the next fiscal year, what does 00:23:12.070 --> 00:23:14.370 align:middle line:84% this budget do to recognize what's 00:23:14.370 --> 00:23:17.390 align:middle line:90% happening in this fiscal year. 00:23:17.390 --> 00:23:20.010 align:middle line:84% In addition to that in the ramp up, 00:23:20.010 --> 00:23:23.170 align:middle line:84% in the leading up to this particular budget, Mr. 00:23:23.170 --> 00:23:26.370 align:middle line:84% President, we have heard about the fact 00:23:26.370 --> 00:23:29.090 align:middle line:84% that prior to any underperformance 00:23:29.090 --> 00:23:32.000 align:middle line:84% there may well have been a structural deficit that we 00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:33.150 align:middle line:90% had to close. 00:23:33.150 --> 00:23:35.670 align:middle line:84% And I think sometimes that fact is 00:23:35.670 --> 00:23:39.460 align:middle line:84% lost as we consider some of the other things that 00:23:39.460 --> 00:23:43.160 align:middle line:84% are in the budgetary universe, such as the under-performance 00:23:43.160 --> 00:23:45.010 align:middle line:90% of revenue collection. 00:23:45.010 --> 00:23:47.500 align:middle line:84% But it shouldn't be under-recognized 00:23:47.500 --> 00:23:50.094 align:middle line:84% because it takes a lot of effort on the part 00:23:50.094 --> 00:23:51.510 align:middle line:84% of the Committee on Ways and Means 00:23:51.510 --> 00:23:53.720 align:middle line:90% to close the structural deficit. 00:23:53.720 --> 00:23:56.570 align:middle line:84% And so I'm hoping that the distinguished Chair 00:23:56.570 --> 00:24:00.900 align:middle line:84% Lady of Ways and Means can share with us information about what 00:24:00.900 --> 00:24:05.340 align:middle line:84% that was prior to even thinking about some 00:24:05.340 --> 00:24:06.670 align:middle line:90% of those other factors. 00:24:06.670 --> 00:24:08.840 align:middle line:84% How much of a structural deficit did we have? 00:24:08.840 --> 00:24:10.950 align:middle line:90% And how was it closed? 00:24:10.950 --> 00:24:15.220 align:middle line:84% And then in addition to that, Mr. President, 00:24:15.220 --> 00:24:18.630 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we can remind ourselves 00:24:18.630 --> 00:24:21.621 align:middle line:84% through the sage advice and recollection 00:24:21.621 --> 00:24:23.620 align:middle line:84% of the distinguished Chair Lady on the Committee 00:24:23.620 --> 00:24:27.390 align:middle line:84% on Ways and Means of how many supplemental budgets we have 00:24:27.390 --> 00:24:32.580 align:middle line:84% had to undertake to compensate for issues 00:24:32.580 --> 00:24:34.900 align:middle line:84% with the original General Appropriations Act 00:24:34.900 --> 00:24:39.440 align:middle line:84% for fiscal year 2017, which we are still in. 00:24:39.440 --> 00:24:42.750 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, we all know that oftentimes we 00:24:42.750 --> 00:24:47.900 align:middle line:84% use supplemental budgets to be able to address various issues 00:24:47.900 --> 00:24:51.010 align:middle line:84% to ensure that the budget stays balanced in response 00:24:51.010 --> 00:24:52.950 align:middle line:90% to its funding commitments. 00:24:52.950 --> 00:24:55.610 align:middle line:84% So I'm hoping that we can understand how many of those 00:24:55.610 --> 00:24:56.680 align:middle line:90% we've already had. 00:24:56.680 --> 00:25:02.270 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, as I did with my original request 00:25:02.270 --> 00:25:03.890 align:middle line:84% for the information [INAUDIBLE] I'm 00:25:03.890 --> 00:25:06.470 align:middle line:84% going to stop right there so that we can 00:25:06.470 --> 00:25:08.380 align:middle line:90% do this in a digestible way. 00:25:08.380 --> 00:25:11.000 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:13.710 align:middle line:84% From Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka. 00:25:13.710 --> 00:25:15.670 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you 00:25:15.670 --> 00:25:17.200 align:middle line:90% to the minority leader. 00:25:17.200 --> 00:25:17.800 align:middle line:90% Hello. 00:25:17.800 --> 00:25:18.480 align:middle line:90% Good morning. 00:25:18.480 --> 00:25:20.990 align:middle line:90% 00:25:20.990 --> 00:25:26.060 align:middle line:84% As you know, as you've stated, our revenues 00:25:26.060 --> 00:25:29.000 align:middle line:84% are not coming in as hoped or expected. 00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:34.620 align:middle line:84% We are $462 million below benchmark by the end of April. 00:25:34.620 --> 00:25:39.050 align:middle line:84% So we are closely monitoring the revenues. 00:25:39.050 --> 00:25:43.090 align:middle line:84% We are very closely working with the House 00:25:43.090 --> 00:25:45.730 align:middle line:84% and the administration, particularly 00:25:45.730 --> 00:25:50.260 align:middle line:84% the Secretary of A and F to look at and analyze 00:25:50.260 --> 00:25:53.230 align:middle line:90% this year's fiscal picture. 00:25:53.230 --> 00:25:56.680 align:middle line:84% There are still two months left for tax collections. 00:25:56.680 --> 00:26:00.780 align:middle line:84% And we'll see how that turns out, particularly 00:26:00.780 --> 00:26:02.540 align:middle line:90% for the month of May. 00:26:02.540 --> 00:26:06.330 align:middle line:84% This budget, like the house one budget, 00:26:06.330 --> 00:26:10.260 align:middle line:84% the governor's budget and the house final budget 00:26:10.260 --> 00:26:13.400 align:middle line:84% relied upon the consensus revenue 00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:17.780 align:middle line:84% that we all agreed upon back in January. 00:26:17.780 --> 00:26:28.220 align:middle line:84% That was based on a 3.9% revenue growth generating $27.072 00:26:28.220 --> 00:26:31.460 align:middle line:90% billion in tax revenue before-- 00:26:31.460 --> 00:26:37.110 align:middle line:84% that would be before any pre-budget transfers. 00:26:37.110 --> 00:26:42.620 align:middle line:84% So this amount that I alluded to a week ago 00:26:42.620 --> 00:26:47.850 align:middle line:84% may need updating in June, like we did last year. 00:26:47.850 --> 00:26:52.720 align:middle line:84% There's a lot of theories as to why April was not a good month. 00:26:52.720 --> 00:26:57.960 align:middle line:84% There is no true clarity to say, yes, this is it. 00:26:57.960 --> 00:27:01.400 align:middle line:84% Some people may have been holding on to their returns 00:27:01.400 --> 00:27:03.250 align:middle line:90% and not getting it. 00:27:03.250 --> 00:27:07.350 align:middle line:84% They may be filing more in May, which it seems by mid-month 00:27:07.350 --> 00:27:08.890 align:middle line:90% that may be happening. 00:27:08.890 --> 00:27:10.340 align:middle line:90% But we will see. 00:27:10.340 --> 00:27:15.040 align:middle line:84% And then have a discussion working together 00:27:15.040 --> 00:27:18.470 align:middle line:84% with the House and the administration 00:27:18.470 --> 00:27:24.620 align:middle line:84% to really determine how to best address 00:27:24.620 --> 00:27:30.610 align:middle line:84% any potential challenges that we have for fiscal '18, and what 00:27:30.610 --> 00:27:32.950 align:middle line:90% we do with the budget. 00:27:32.950 --> 00:27:35.740 align:middle line:84% So we will address it, if need be. 00:27:35.740 --> 00:27:39.500 align:middle line:84% And we will work collaboratively which 00:27:39.500 --> 00:27:43.560 align:middle line:84% I think you would agree is the best way to go forward. 00:27:43.560 --> 00:27:47.660 align:middle line:84% There was a question as to how many supplemental budgets 00:27:47.660 --> 00:27:50.640 align:middle line:90% there's been for fiscal '17. 00:27:50.640 --> 00:27:53.080 align:middle line:90% And the governor has filed two. 00:27:53.080 --> 00:27:56.160 align:middle line:90% We did one a few weeks ago. 00:27:56.160 --> 00:28:00.690 align:middle line:84% And we may be doing, as a body, another one next week 00:28:00.690 --> 00:28:02.750 align:middle line:90% or the week after. 00:28:02.750 --> 00:28:08.520 align:middle line:84% There always are supplemental budgets, unforeseen items, 00:28:08.520 --> 00:28:12.490 align:middle line:84% or sometimes we wait to see, for example, 00:28:12.490 --> 00:28:17.220 align:middle line:84% CPCS in the Governor's budget was a little higher 00:28:17.220 --> 00:28:18.090 align:middle line:90% for a balance. 00:28:18.090 --> 00:28:20.280 align:middle line:84% Some of it has decreased a little bit. 00:28:20.280 --> 00:28:22.410 align:middle line:84% So for some of the-- particularly the 00:28:22.410 --> 00:28:27.400 align:middle line:84% caseload-driven line items, it's difficult 12 months in advance 00:28:27.400 --> 00:28:30.550 align:middle line:84% to know what the final true numbers will 00:28:30.550 --> 00:28:32.290 align:middle line:90% be for that line item. 00:28:32.290 --> 00:28:35.180 align:middle line:84% So as the year gets closer, sometimes that's 00:28:35.180 --> 00:28:38.120 align:middle line:90% when we make some adjustments. 00:28:38.120 --> 00:28:42.410 align:middle line:84% But I do just want to reiterate that even once again, even 00:28:42.410 --> 00:28:48.530 align:middle line:84% during tough fiscal times, we have met our obligations. 00:28:48.530 --> 00:28:53.100 align:middle line:84% And going back to the theme to sustain our Commonwealth, 00:28:53.100 --> 00:28:57.210 align:middle line:84% to support and strengthen our residents, our communities, 00:28:57.210 --> 00:29:01.930 align:middle line:84% the families, I'm proud to say that this budget reflects 00:29:01.930 --> 00:29:06.780 align:middle line:84% the priorities of each one of you here today. 00:29:06.780 --> 00:29:11.470 align:middle line:84% Each one of you has shared your statewide programmatic 00:29:11.470 --> 00:29:14.280 align:middle line:84% priorities, your district priorities. 00:29:14.280 --> 00:29:17.160 align:middle line:84% And this budget incorporates, even though it 00:29:17.160 --> 00:29:20.800 align:middle line:90% has been a tough fiscal time. 00:29:20.800 --> 00:29:24.060 align:middle line:84% Chapter 70 education, which has been 00:29:24.060 --> 00:29:32.720 align:middle line:84% a top priority for the Senate reflects $128.8 million 00:29:32.720 --> 00:29:37.150 align:middle line:90% increase over fiscal year '17. 00:29:37.150 --> 00:29:39.520 align:middle line:84% Throughout the Commonwealth, we're 00:29:39.520 --> 00:29:43.840 align:middle line:84% taking steps to implement the recommendations 00:29:43.840 --> 00:29:47.330 align:middle line:84% of the Foundation Budget Review Commission. 00:29:47.330 --> 00:29:52.510 align:middle line:84% And we address so many other areas that I said before. 00:29:52.510 --> 00:29:56.380 align:middle line:84% So despite this tough time, yes, we did 00:29:56.380 --> 00:30:00.150 align:middle line:84% raise some revenue, the Governor raised $300 million 00:30:00.150 --> 00:30:03.760 align:middle line:84% in what he referred to as an employer assessment. 00:30:03.760 --> 00:30:06.610 align:middle line:90% We did $180 million. 00:30:06.610 --> 00:30:10.650 align:middle line:84% We direct the Governor to work in some ways 00:30:10.650 --> 00:30:11.930 align:middle line:90% similar to the House. 00:30:11.930 --> 00:30:17.390 align:middle line:84% But we also say you have choices either through an employer 00:30:17.390 --> 00:30:22.390 align:middle line:84% assessment or contribution or through the EMAC the Employer 00:30:22.390 --> 00:30:25.140 align:middle line:90% Medical Assistance Contribution. 00:30:25.140 --> 00:30:27.760 align:middle line:84% So there are options and alternatives 00:30:27.760 --> 00:30:31.230 align:middle line:90% and ways to raise some revenue. 00:30:31.230 --> 00:30:33.330 align:middle line:90% All three budgets before-- 00:30:33.330 --> 00:30:35.770 align:middle line:84% the two budgets before us recognized 00:30:35.770 --> 00:30:39.090 align:middle line:84% that we need to raise revenue and did so as well. 00:30:39.090 --> 00:30:45.880 align:middle line:84% We raised $409 million to meet the obligations that 00:30:45.880 --> 00:30:47.460 align:middle line:90% are before us. 00:30:47.460 --> 00:30:53.660 align:middle line:84% So I do believe that this is a fiscally responsible budget. 00:30:53.660 --> 00:30:55.230 align:middle line:90% It's a balanced budget. 00:30:55.230 --> 00:30:58.670 align:middle line:84% And we will move forward as we debate. 00:30:58.670 --> 00:30:59.190 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:30:59.190 --> 00:31:02.460 align:middle line:90% 00:31:02.460 --> 00:31:05.720 align:middle line:84% Senator Moore and Senator Fattman. 00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:09.930 align:middle line:84% The Chair calls upon Senators Moore and Fattman 00:31:09.930 --> 00:31:11.950 align:middle line:84% to introduce some special visitors. 00:31:11.950 --> 00:31:16.169 align:middle line:90% 00:31:16.169 --> 00:31:17.210 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:31:17.210 --> 00:31:18.370 align:middle line:90% Good morning to the body. 00:31:18.370 --> 00:31:21.930 align:middle line:84% I have the honor today of introducing the Northbridge 00:31:21.930 --> 00:31:25.060 align:middle line:84% High School sophomore class, that came to see us in action 00:31:25.060 --> 00:31:27.410 align:middle line:84% today, starting our budget debates. 00:31:27.410 --> 00:31:29.640 align:middle line:84% Senator Fattman and I have the honor 00:31:29.640 --> 00:31:31.870 align:middle line:84% of representing the town of Northbridge. 00:31:31.870 --> 00:31:33.480 align:middle line:90% Senator Fattman. 00:31:33.480 --> 00:31:35.306 align:middle line:84% I have the southern part of Northbridge 00:31:35.306 --> 00:31:36.930 align:middle line:84% and Senator Moore as the northern part. 00:31:36.930 --> 00:31:39.090 align:middle line:84% And then we'd also like to welcome our colleague 00:31:39.090 --> 00:31:42.020 align:middle line:84% from the House who has all of Northbridge, Representative 00:31:42.020 --> 00:31:43.720 align:middle line:90% David Muradian. 00:31:43.720 --> 00:32:03.380 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:32:03.380 --> 00:32:11.690 align:middle line:84% -- happy to know that as we begin the budget debate here 00:32:11.690 --> 00:32:15.240 align:middle line:84% in the Senate that the Senate made a very high priority 00:32:15.240 --> 00:32:18.160 align:middle line:84% of funding for public higher education. 00:32:18.160 --> 00:32:21.100 align:middle line:84% And the Governor, the Senate, and the House each 00:32:21.100 --> 00:32:22.750 align:middle line:90% file a separate bill. 00:32:22.750 --> 00:32:24.570 align:middle line:84% And then we work out the differences 00:32:24.570 --> 00:32:28.890 align:middle line:84% in a conference committee as the next stage in the process. 00:32:28.890 --> 00:32:32.790 align:middle line:84% And you'll be happy to know that the Senate included 00:32:32.790 --> 00:32:35.740 align:middle line:84% a significant amount of funding, in fact a little bit more 00:32:35.740 --> 00:32:40.570 align:middle line:84% than either the House and the Governor, I believe, in total. 00:32:40.570 --> 00:32:42.250 align:middle line:84% But together we're working to try 00:32:42.250 --> 00:32:45.170 align:middle line:84% to maintain the momentum we have because we have the best 00:32:45.170 --> 00:32:47.380 align:middle line:84% public education system in America, 00:32:47.380 --> 00:32:50.690 align:middle line:84% although we do have some gaps and room for improvement. 00:32:50.690 --> 00:32:54.030 align:middle line:84% And through the work we do here in the chamber both policy 00:32:54.030 --> 00:32:57.580 align:middle line:84% and budget, we hope that we will continue to make progress 00:32:57.580 --> 00:33:01.640 align:middle line:84% so we can support young people in their education 00:33:01.640 --> 00:33:04.210 align:middle line:84% so they can become productive adults to take 00:33:04.210 --> 00:33:06.760 align:middle line:84% their place in society as informed 00:33:06.760 --> 00:33:10.550 align:middle line:84% voters and effective, productive people in the workforce. 00:33:10.550 --> 00:33:12.760 align:middle line:84% So thank you for joining us today. 00:33:12.760 --> 00:33:14.900 align:middle line:84% And we'll continue with our debate. 00:33:14.900 --> 00:33:18.350 align:middle line:90% 00:33:18.350 --> 00:33:20.197 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:33:20.197 --> 00:33:22.780 align:middle line:84% Why, thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 00:33:22.780 --> 00:33:25.200 align:middle line:84% I appreciate the gentle lady's explanation. 00:33:25.200 --> 00:33:27.860 align:middle line:84% And she's actually covered a couple of the other questions 00:33:27.860 --> 00:33:30.680 align:middle line:84% that we have and continue to have, Mr. President. 00:33:30.680 --> 00:33:33.840 align:middle line:84% And that is whether or not the budget 00:33:33.840 --> 00:33:35.930 align:middle line:84% as it pends before the Senate fully 00:33:35.930 --> 00:33:39.390 align:middle line:84% addresses all of the known obligations 00:33:39.390 --> 00:33:43.590 align:middle line:84% that we have with regard to a number of accounts, Mr. 00:33:43.590 --> 00:33:45.430 align:middle line:84% President, and whether or not we're 00:33:45.430 --> 00:33:48.590 align:middle line:84% going to need some additional supplemental spending, as we 00:33:48.590 --> 00:33:51.680 align:middle line:84% stand here today, relative to those accounts. 00:33:51.680 --> 00:33:53.470 align:middle line:84% And certainly it seems Mr. President 00:33:53.470 --> 00:33:56.780 align:middle line:84% that the Chairs has indicated that it 00:33:56.780 --> 00:33:59.820 align:middle line:84% appears that the budget addresses all of those things. 00:33:59.820 --> 00:34:01.860 align:middle line:84% But when it comes to caseload-driven kinds 00:34:01.860 --> 00:34:04.880 align:middle line:84% of things, the difficulty in predictability makes it hard. 00:34:04.880 --> 00:34:08.570 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President we still are concerned about some 00:34:08.570 --> 00:34:10.581 align:middle line:90% of those other obligations. 00:34:10.581 --> 00:34:12.580 align:middle line:84% And we could talk about that later in the debate 00:34:12.580 --> 00:34:15.070 align:middle line:84% about things that are not funded in this budget 00:34:15.070 --> 00:34:18.219 align:middle line:84% that we know at some point will need to be paid for. 00:34:18.219 --> 00:34:20.920 align:middle line:84% And so we're concerned about that. 00:34:20.920 --> 00:34:23.610 align:middle line:84% In addition, Mr. President, we have questions 00:34:23.610 --> 00:34:26.710 align:middle line:84% and continue to have questions about the sustainability 00:34:26.710 --> 00:34:29.560 align:middle line:84% of this budget in light of current revenue trends. 00:34:29.560 --> 00:34:31.639 align:middle line:84% The Chair Lady has addressed that. 00:34:31.639 --> 00:34:32.530 align:middle line:90% Mr. President. 00:34:32.530 --> 00:34:35.110 align:middle line:90% 00:34:35.110 --> 00:34:37.120 align:middle line:84% The Senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:34:37.120 --> 00:34:38.710 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, while many say that I 00:34:38.710 --> 00:34:41.046 align:middle line:84% enjoy hearing myself speak, right now 00:34:41.046 --> 00:34:42.920 align:middle line:84% I'm the only one that can have that pleasure. 00:34:42.920 --> 00:34:46.040 align:middle line:84% I hope you'll bring the Senate to order. 00:34:46.040 --> 00:34:49.989 align:middle line:84% The Chair would respectfully ask all members and guests 00:34:49.989 --> 00:34:53.969 align:middle line:84% to please subdue their conversations so 00:34:53.969 --> 00:34:56.880 align:middle line:84% that the gentleman who is speaking may be heard. 00:34:56.880 --> 00:34:59.360 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:34:59.360 --> 00:35:00.790 align:middle line:90% Why, thank you, Mr. President. 00:35:00.790 --> 00:35:03.870 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, we know that the budget 00:35:03.870 --> 00:35:09.310 align:middle line:84% increases spending over fiscal year 2017 by about 3.3%. 00:35:09.310 --> 00:35:11.900 align:middle line:84% And that's a significant amount of money. 00:35:11.900 --> 00:35:15.850 align:middle line:84% And as we have said repeatedly from Minority Crescent, 00:35:15.850 --> 00:35:18.030 align:middle line:84% it's important to think about all 00:35:18.030 --> 00:35:20.720 align:middle line:84% of the dimensions of budgeting and certainly it's 00:35:20.720 --> 00:35:23.770 align:middle line:84% glamorous to be able to speak to increases and priorities 00:35:23.770 --> 00:35:25.560 align:middle line:90% that many of us share. 00:35:25.560 --> 00:35:27.550 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, it's also important not 00:35:27.550 --> 00:35:31.650 align:middle line:84% to miss opportunities to save money as well as capture 00:35:31.650 --> 00:35:33.630 align:middle line:90% opportunities to spend money. 00:35:33.630 --> 00:35:36.880 align:middle line:84% So I'm hoping that we can hear from the distinguished 00:35:36.880 --> 00:35:41.530 align:middle line:84% Chair about some mechanisms that may be in this budget 00:35:41.530 --> 00:35:46.100 align:middle line:84% to actually capture savings as we embark on spending 00:35:46.100 --> 00:35:49.620 align:middle line:90% almost $40.8 billion. 00:35:49.620 --> 00:35:52.080 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:35:52.080 --> 00:35:55.200 align:middle line:84% From Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka. 00:35:55.200 --> 00:35:56.700 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:35:56.700 --> 00:35:59.790 align:middle line:84% And thank you for this question because the budget includes 00:35:59.790 --> 00:36:04.020 align:middle line:84% many initiatives for savings and cost savings initiatives. 00:36:04.020 --> 00:36:06.060 align:middle line:90% I will highlight just a few. 00:36:06.060 --> 00:36:09.280 align:middle line:84% Otherwise, we might be here till this evening. 00:36:09.280 --> 00:36:13.880 align:middle line:84% Again the theme of the budget is sustaining our Commonwealth. 00:36:13.880 --> 00:36:19.320 align:middle line:84% So we've made very conscious efforts to direct funding 00:36:19.320 --> 00:36:22.430 align:middle line:84% to programs to sustain our children, families, 00:36:22.430 --> 00:36:24.220 align:middle line:90% and communities. 00:36:24.220 --> 00:36:27.950 align:middle line:84% The budget makes significant investments in the state's 00:36:27.950 --> 00:36:30.550 align:middle line:90% early childhood education. 00:36:30.550 --> 00:36:37.480 align:middle line:84% In fact, $15.1 million for implementing low income early 00:36:37.480 --> 00:36:40.270 align:middle line:90% ed programs across the state. 00:36:40.270 --> 00:36:46.160 align:middle line:84% This will be an incredible return on investment, not only 00:36:46.160 --> 00:36:50.000 align:middle line:84% for each individual child, both as they 00:36:50.000 --> 00:36:54.140 align:middle line:84% go through the early education, but research 00:36:54.140 --> 00:36:57.780 align:middle line:84% shows that that helps that child for the rest 00:36:57.780 --> 00:37:03.650 align:middle line:84% of not only their school career but into their work career. 00:37:03.650 --> 00:37:07.850 align:middle line:84% It helps them with the other aspects of education. 00:37:07.850 --> 00:37:12.980 align:middle line:84% And it'll help them with success for their entire future. 00:37:12.980 --> 00:37:15.820 align:middle line:84% For the Commonwealth, that will also 00:37:15.820 --> 00:37:21.850 align:middle line:84% translate into cost savings as these kids grow and go 00:37:21.850 --> 00:37:22.990 align:middle line:90% through the system. 00:37:22.990 --> 00:37:25.690 align:middle line:84% They've had early identification for maybe 00:37:25.690 --> 00:37:28.180 align:middle line:84% some educational reading help or whatever 00:37:28.180 --> 00:37:30.430 align:middle line:90% else that might be needed. 00:37:30.430 --> 00:37:33.440 align:middle line:84% And that they will turn into more 00:37:33.440 --> 00:37:37.060 align:middle line:84% productive, self-sufficient adults, 00:37:37.060 --> 00:37:40.740 align:middle line:84% saving the Commonwealth money later on 00:37:40.740 --> 00:37:45.160 align:middle line:84% and help have self-sufficient productive families 00:37:45.160 --> 00:37:46.650 align:middle line:90% as they grow up. 00:37:46.650 --> 00:37:48.830 align:middle line:84% So that is something that I think 00:37:48.830 --> 00:37:52.460 align:middle line:90% we can all be very proud of. 00:37:52.460 --> 00:37:58.430 align:middle line:84% We also, like last year, another example, 00:37:58.430 --> 00:38:03.440 align:middle line:84% is we have $150,000 for a pilot program 00:38:03.440 --> 00:38:07.320 align:middle line:84% to fund grants to low income tax clinics. 00:38:07.320 --> 00:38:11.330 align:middle line:84% These clinics will assist low income filers 00:38:11.330 --> 00:38:14.610 align:middle line:84% to ensure that the Commonwealth is collecting 00:38:14.610 --> 00:38:19.370 align:middle line:84% the appropriate level of taxes and that they are also 00:38:19.370 --> 00:38:22.800 align:middle line:84% obtaining if say they have access to the EITC, 00:38:22.800 --> 00:38:27.270 align:middle line:84% that they have the right to collect that as well. 00:38:27.270 --> 00:38:30.320 align:middle line:84% We also change the ratio of public defenders 00:38:30.320 --> 00:38:36.820 align:middle line:84% to private defenders within CPCS from the 25/75 to 20/80. 00:38:36.820 --> 00:38:37.320 align:middle line:90% A.d. 00:38:37.320 --> 00:38:41.390 align:middle line:84% We changed it to 25/75 years ago. 00:38:41.390 --> 00:38:45.640 align:middle line:84% And they've never been able to reach the full 25. 00:38:45.640 --> 00:38:47.990 align:middle line:90% That just has not worked out. 00:38:47.990 --> 00:38:51.300 align:middle line:84% So we recognize reality and this will actually 00:38:51.300 --> 00:38:55.860 align:middle line:84% save money for recruitment and retention, 00:38:55.860 --> 00:39:00.240 align:middle line:84% but also generate some cost savings down the line. 00:39:00.240 --> 00:39:03.310 align:middle line:84% So again, there's many, many highlights 00:39:03.310 --> 00:39:05.100 align:middle line:90% in lots of different areas. 00:39:05.100 --> 00:39:08.610 align:middle line:84% The money we've invested in the workforce, the Competitiveness 00:39:08.610 --> 00:39:12.180 align:middle line:84% Trust Fund, we have other money for TRAIN, 00:39:12.180 --> 00:39:15.290 align:middle line:90% it's a program specifically-- 00:39:15.290 --> 00:39:17.105 align:middle line:84% it's a Senate initiative specific-- 00:39:17.105 --> 00:39:21.090 align:middle line:90% 00:39:21.090 --> 00:39:22.859 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:39:22.859 --> 00:39:23.900 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:39:23.900 --> 00:39:25.560 align:middle line:84% I apologize to the gentle lady, but it 00:39:25.560 --> 00:39:28.220 align:middle line:84% is getting difficult to hear in the chamber. 00:39:28.220 --> 00:39:30.540 align:middle line:84% And this is important information, Mr. President. 00:39:30.540 --> 00:39:32.270 align:middle line:84% We're talking about the parameters 00:39:32.270 --> 00:39:34.930 align:middle line:90% of a $40 plus billion budget. 00:39:34.930 --> 00:39:37.850 align:middle line:84% The Chair Lady is explaining critical information 00:39:37.850 --> 00:39:39.927 align:middle line:84% about what's contained in that budget. 00:39:39.927 --> 00:39:41.510 align:middle line:84% And I would hope that the Senate would 00:39:41.510 --> 00:39:43.350 align:middle line:84% be brought to order so that we can all share 00:39:43.350 --> 00:39:45.220 align:middle line:90% in hearing that information. 00:39:45.220 --> 00:39:47.890 align:middle line:84% The gentleman's point is well-taken. 00:39:47.890 --> 00:39:50.690 align:middle line:84% And the Chair would again respectfully ask members 00:39:50.690 --> 00:39:53.180 align:middle line:84% if you need to engage in conversation 00:39:53.180 --> 00:39:55.880 align:middle line:84% and certainly there is plenty for people 00:39:55.880 --> 00:39:57.380 align:middle line:84% to be talking about with each other, 00:39:57.380 --> 00:40:00.610 align:middle line:84% we certainly understand that given over 1,000 amendments, 00:40:00.610 --> 00:40:03.620 align:middle line:84% we would just respectfully ask that you consider 00:40:03.620 --> 00:40:05.640 align:middle line:84% going into the lobby or the reading room 00:40:05.640 --> 00:40:08.590 align:middle line:84% to conduct those conversations as necessary 00:40:08.590 --> 00:40:10.590 align:middle line:84% so that those who are in the chamber 00:40:10.590 --> 00:40:15.980 align:middle line:84% can fully engage and hear the debate that's unfolding. 00:40:15.980 --> 00:40:18.560 align:middle line:84% So again, I thank you for your cooperation. 00:40:18.560 --> 00:40:22.020 align:middle line:84% And we recognize the senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, 00:40:22.020 --> 00:40:23.170 align:middle line:90% Ms. Spilka. 00:40:23.170 --> 00:40:24.320 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:40:24.320 --> 00:40:29.000 align:middle line:84% And I was just ending with one last example, which 00:40:29.000 --> 00:40:32.580 align:middle line:84% is the TRAIN program which the Senate initiated last year 00:40:32.580 --> 00:40:34.880 align:middle line:84% and we've expanded it a little bit. 00:40:34.880 --> 00:40:37.720 align:middle line:84% We've all been hearing that long term 00:40:37.720 --> 00:40:40.540 align:middle line:84% unemployed are having a difficult time getting back 00:40:40.540 --> 00:40:41.590 align:middle line:90% to work. 00:40:41.590 --> 00:40:45.780 align:middle line:84% This program focuses on the long term unemployed working 00:40:45.780 --> 00:40:50.640 align:middle line:84% with our community colleges and the workers in the area 00:40:50.640 --> 00:40:53.310 align:middle line:84% to find out what skills are needed 00:40:53.310 --> 00:40:57.540 align:middle line:84% to help get these long term unemployed folks back to work. 00:40:57.540 --> 00:40:59.580 align:middle line:90% So it specifically targets that. 00:40:59.580 --> 00:41:02.040 align:middle line:84% It's been successful in getting off the ground 00:41:02.040 --> 00:41:03.300 align:middle line:90% and helping people. 00:41:03.300 --> 00:41:05.780 align:middle line:90% So we build upon that as well. 00:41:05.780 --> 00:41:08.950 align:middle line:84% So I would suggest that the budget 00:41:08.950 --> 00:41:14.880 align:middle line:84% is replete with initiatives for cost savings. 00:41:14.880 --> 00:41:16.690 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:41:16.690 --> 00:41:17.630 align:middle line:90% I appreciate that. 00:41:17.630 --> 00:41:19.140 align:middle line:84% And I would suggest that the Senate 00:41:19.140 --> 00:41:22.430 align:middle line:84% is replete with spending that we hope will produce cost savings. 00:41:22.430 --> 00:41:25.800 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I guess it's all in the eye of the beholder. 00:41:25.800 --> 00:41:29.640 align:middle line:84% But we do hope during the debate to offer some other initiatives 00:41:29.640 --> 00:41:33.320 align:middle line:84% to be able to save some dollars in addition 00:41:33.320 --> 00:41:35.350 align:middle line:84% to those that have already been explained 00:41:35.350 --> 00:41:36.850 align:middle line:84% and those that will be explained. 00:41:36.850 --> 00:41:39.620 align:middle line:84% But along those same lines, Mr. President, 00:41:39.620 --> 00:41:41.970 align:middle line:84% there are some revenue raising initiatives. 00:41:41.970 --> 00:41:44.450 align:middle line:84% The gentle lady who is the Chair of Ways and Means 00:41:44.450 --> 00:41:47.320 align:middle line:84% has already made reference to one, relative 00:41:47.320 --> 00:41:49.800 align:middle line:84% to employer assessments for health insurance. 00:41:49.800 --> 00:41:52.660 align:middle line:84% I don't think we need to revisit that at this moment. 00:41:52.660 --> 00:41:55.150 align:middle line:84% I think there is flexibility in this budget 00:41:55.150 --> 00:41:57.650 align:middle line:84% to be able to address that issue and to be 00:41:57.650 --> 00:42:01.280 align:middle line:84% able to in part create a cultural shift away 00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:06.000 align:middle line:84% from the temptation to enroll folks into Mass Health programs 00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:08.730 align:middle line:84% that otherwise would be covered by private insurance, 00:42:08.730 --> 00:42:10.720 align:middle line:84% and should be covered by private insurance. 00:42:10.720 --> 00:42:13.160 align:middle line:84% So I don't think we need to discuss that any further. 00:42:13.160 --> 00:42:17.070 align:middle line:84% But there are, Mr. President, some tax initiatives 00:42:17.070 --> 00:42:19.350 align:middle line:90% in the budget, Mr. President. 00:42:19.350 --> 00:42:22.250 align:middle line:84% And that's because the budget is a money bill. 00:42:22.250 --> 00:42:23.860 align:middle line:90% I just wanted to say that again. 00:42:23.860 --> 00:42:28.210 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President could we hopefully 00:42:28.210 --> 00:42:31.090 align:middle line:84% have an explanation from the distinguished Chair 00:42:31.090 --> 00:42:33.350 align:middle line:84% Lady of Ways and Means about what 00:42:33.350 --> 00:42:36.900 align:middle line:84% some of those tax changes, those initiatives are, 00:42:36.900 --> 00:42:39.290 align:middle line:84% and to be clear on the record, Mr. President, 00:42:39.290 --> 00:42:42.320 align:middle line:84% whether or not they are intended to be permanent 00:42:42.320 --> 00:42:46.540 align:middle line:84% or whether they are being initiated in response to what 00:42:46.540 --> 00:42:49.150 align:middle line:84% is a clear revenue issue that must 00:42:49.150 --> 00:42:52.490 align:middle line:84% be addressed in this budget and going forward. 00:42:52.490 --> 00:42:55.310 align:middle line:84% In addition to that, Mr. President, 00:42:55.310 --> 00:42:58.970 align:middle line:84% there are some major spending increase initiatives 00:42:58.970 --> 00:42:59.890 align:middle line:90% in this budget. 00:42:59.890 --> 00:43:02.200 align:middle line:84% There is the expansion of the housing court. 00:43:02.200 --> 00:43:06.440 align:middle line:84% There is a reserve for criminal justice reform. 00:43:06.440 --> 00:43:08.920 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, as we've talked about so many 00:43:08.920 --> 00:43:12.490 align:middle line:84% of the important things that are in this budget and again, 00:43:12.490 --> 00:43:15.080 align:middle line:84% we want to continue to focus on commitments that we've already 00:43:15.080 --> 00:43:18.110 align:middle line:84% made to things like the Foundation budget 00:43:18.110 --> 00:43:20.720 align:middle line:84% and to things like early childhood education 00:43:20.720 --> 00:43:22.520 align:middle line:84% and to things like ensuring that we have 00:43:22.520 --> 00:43:25.220 align:middle line:90% appropriate housing for folks. 00:43:25.220 --> 00:43:27.870 align:middle line:84% What is the context and, Mr. President, 00:43:27.870 --> 00:43:31.470 align:middle line:84% what is the rationale for major expansions 00:43:31.470 --> 00:43:34.530 align:middle line:84% in a situation where we're facing declining revenue 00:43:34.530 --> 00:43:37.590 align:middle line:84% and in a situation where in the future 00:43:37.590 --> 00:43:39.690 align:middle line:84% it would not be unreasonable to suggest 00:43:39.690 --> 00:43:42.730 align:middle line:84% we may have to reduce elements in this budget. 00:43:42.730 --> 00:43:45.320 align:middle line:90% Why do we have major expansions? 00:43:45.320 --> 00:43:47.960 align:middle line:84% And how were they accommodated given that reality? 00:43:47.960 --> 00:43:49.150 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:43:49.150 --> 00:43:52.609 align:middle line:84% The Senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka. 00:43:52.609 --> 00:43:53.650 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:43:53.650 --> 00:43:55.910 align:middle line:84% I'll try to break down your question 00:43:55.910 --> 00:44:00.500 align:middle line:84% and go through first just a few of the tax changes or revenue 00:44:00.500 --> 00:44:04.240 align:middle line:84% enhancers that we did in the budget. 00:44:04.240 --> 00:44:09.170 align:middle line:84% And I again note that the Governor did some in his budget 00:44:09.170 --> 00:44:12.770 align:middle line:84% to a tune of a little bit more than what we did. 00:44:12.770 --> 00:44:15.020 align:middle line:90% The House, about the same. 00:44:15.020 --> 00:44:20.240 align:middle line:84% We did the $180 million for the employer assessment 00:44:20.240 --> 00:44:21.220 align:middle line:90% or the EMAC. 00:44:21.220 --> 00:44:23.910 align:middle line:90% The governor did $300 million. 00:44:23.910 --> 00:44:28.240 align:middle line:84% We did what the Governor proposed, to some extent, 00:44:28.240 --> 00:44:35.740 align:middle line:84% on accelerating sales tax remittance for $125 million. 00:44:35.740 --> 00:44:40.280 align:middle line:84% However, after meeting with a lot of the businesses involved 00:44:40.280 --> 00:44:43.410 align:middle line:84% in this-- and this a one time issue, 00:44:43.410 --> 00:44:45.180 align:middle line:90% it would raise money one time. 00:44:45.180 --> 00:44:48.280 align:middle line:84% And I do want to mention that the employer 00:44:48.280 --> 00:44:52.030 align:middle line:84% assessment or EMAC, we limited it to two years, 00:44:52.030 --> 00:44:55.510 align:middle line:84% knowing that this is only a short term fix. 00:44:55.510 --> 00:44:59.800 align:middle line:84% And I do want to note our Chair of Health Care Finance 00:44:59.800 --> 00:45:02.660 align:middle line:84% and others are in this, on a great working group, 00:45:02.660 --> 00:45:05.660 align:middle line:84% to lower the overall cost of health care. 00:45:05.660 --> 00:45:08.700 align:middle line:84% We're looking at long term cost containment. 00:45:08.700 --> 00:45:13.630 align:middle line:84% So the assessment slash EMAC would be a short term 00:45:13.630 --> 00:45:14.740 align:middle line:90% two-year fix. 00:45:14.740 --> 00:45:18.700 align:middle line:84% The accelerated sales tax remittance, 00:45:18.700 --> 00:45:21.050 align:middle line:90% we added a prepayment. 00:45:21.050 --> 00:45:25.160 align:middle line:84% The businesses said other states have done that. 00:45:25.160 --> 00:45:27.050 align:middle line:90% And that's more workable. 00:45:27.050 --> 00:45:29.470 align:middle line:84% So we give the governor the choice 00:45:29.470 --> 00:45:33.440 align:middle line:84% of working with the businesses, of doing that. 00:45:33.440 --> 00:45:38.270 align:middle line:84% We do a tax on short term rentals, which some people 00:45:38.270 --> 00:45:41.140 align:middle line:90% refer to as the Airbnb tax. 00:45:41.140 --> 00:45:44.250 align:middle line:84% The Governor did one proposal in his budget, 00:45:44.250 --> 00:45:47.390 align:middle line:84% we expanded it a little bit more. 00:45:47.390 --> 00:45:50.790 align:middle line:90% So we have that in there. 00:45:50.790 --> 00:45:54.960 align:middle line:84% We closed the loophole on room resellers. 00:45:54.960 --> 00:45:59.830 align:middle line:84% So, for example, hotel.com, Expedia, 00:45:59.830 --> 00:46:02.480 align:middle line:84% and some of the other large companies 00:46:02.480 --> 00:46:06.060 align:middle line:84% that buy hotel rooms in bulk, get a low price. 00:46:06.060 --> 00:46:07.700 align:middle line:90% They pay tax on that. 00:46:07.700 --> 00:46:12.850 align:middle line:84% And then they resell those rooms to folks like you 00:46:12.850 --> 00:46:15.090 align:middle line:84% and I and others across the state. 00:46:15.090 --> 00:46:19.300 align:middle line:84% There's no tax currently paid on the increase that they charge. 00:46:19.300 --> 00:46:22.730 align:middle line:84% So we closed that loophole as well. 00:46:22.730 --> 00:46:30.210 align:middle line:84% So that is some of the tax revenue enhancers that we do. 00:46:30.210 --> 00:46:34.370 align:middle line:84% And I do want to address the housing 00:46:34.370 --> 00:46:37.890 align:middle line:84% court and the criminal justice reform. 00:46:37.890 --> 00:46:47.480 align:middle line:84% Housing court, I would argue, is something that we simply cannot 00:46:47.480 --> 00:46:49.570 align:middle line:90% afford to not do. 00:46:49.570 --> 00:46:56.730 align:middle line:84% I think about 70% of our state has access to a housing court. 00:46:56.730 --> 00:47:00.970 align:middle line:84% And this is something that I believe 00:47:00.970 --> 00:47:08.000 align:middle line:84% the other areas of the state should have access to as well. 00:47:08.000 --> 00:47:10.440 align:middle line:90% Expansion is long overdue. 00:47:10.440 --> 00:47:14.030 align:middle line:84% Its an initiative that directs residents 00:47:14.030 --> 00:47:18.070 align:middle line:84% to the lowest cost per case trial court. 00:47:18.070 --> 00:47:21.120 align:middle line:84% The department's helped landlords and tenants 00:47:21.120 --> 00:47:23.380 align:middle line:90% because they have the expertise. 00:47:23.380 --> 00:47:29.140 align:middle line:84% And they can actually successfully 00:47:29.140 --> 00:47:33.770 align:middle line:84% dispose of cases faster because of that expertise. 00:47:33.770 --> 00:47:38.170 align:middle line:84% So it's [INAUDIBLE] to stabilize tenancies and prevent tenants 00:47:38.170 --> 00:47:40.770 align:middle line:84% from facing eviction and becoming 00:47:40.770 --> 00:47:46.010 align:middle line:84% homeless and increasing our homeless population. 00:47:46.010 --> 00:47:50.490 align:middle line:84% With the criminal justice, as we all know, 00:47:50.490 --> 00:47:54.010 align:middle line:84% the Governor, the Speaker, and the Senate President 00:47:54.010 --> 00:47:57.130 align:middle line:84% have done a collaboration of an initiative 00:47:57.130 --> 00:48:01.380 align:middle line:84% with CSG, the Council on State Governments, 00:48:01.380 --> 00:48:04.130 align:middle line:90% to do criminal justice reform. 00:48:04.130 --> 00:48:07.520 align:middle line:84% I won't go into all of the aspects of it. 00:48:07.520 --> 00:48:11.820 align:middle line:84% But there is an agreement for this coming fiscal year 00:48:11.820 --> 00:48:17.760 align:middle line:84% for the branches to allocate $3.5 million 00:48:17.760 --> 00:48:21.090 align:middle line:90% towards this reform effort. 00:48:21.090 --> 00:48:25.070 align:middle line:84% And all of the branches are agreeing upon this amount 00:48:25.070 --> 00:48:29.940 align:middle line:84% so that we can get that criminal justice reform going. 00:48:29.940 --> 00:48:32.210 align:middle line:84% We believe it's the right time to enhance 00:48:32.210 --> 00:48:35.530 align:middle line:84% our support for the criminal justice initiatives. 00:48:35.530 --> 00:48:39.200 align:middle line:84% This will help reduce recidivism, save money 00:48:39.200 --> 00:48:42.450 align:middle line:84% in our prisons, directing more money 00:48:42.450 --> 00:48:47.460 align:middle line:84% towards education and other programs to reduce recidivism. 00:48:47.460 --> 00:48:53.640 align:middle line:84% The incarceration of just one individual costs about $50,000 00:48:53.640 --> 00:48:55.300 align:middle line:90% a year. 00:48:55.300 --> 00:48:59.470 align:middle line:84% If we can ensure that more individuals stay out of jail, 00:48:59.470 --> 00:49:02.130 align:middle line:84% stay out of the criminal justice system, 00:49:02.130 --> 00:49:05.600 align:middle line:84% and continue to be productive members of our state, 00:49:05.600 --> 00:49:09.200 align:middle line:84% the benefits would be far reaching. 00:49:09.200 --> 00:49:12.930 align:middle line:84% So supporting the socioeconomic success 00:49:12.930 --> 00:49:16.180 align:middle line:84% of well-being of individuals and their families, 00:49:16.180 --> 00:49:20.860 align:middle line:84% while also lowering the state's, and by extension 00:49:20.860 --> 00:49:23.470 align:middle line:90% our tax payer's, costs. 00:49:23.470 --> 00:49:26.570 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:49:26.570 --> 00:49:28.550 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:49:28.550 --> 00:49:29.810 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President-- 00:49:29.810 --> 00:49:32.150 align:middle line:84% Mr. President rather, and to the distinguished Chair. 00:49:32.150 --> 00:49:34.160 align:middle line:90% I appreciate the explanation. 00:49:34.160 --> 00:49:36.550 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, again, we understand 00:49:36.550 --> 00:49:39.390 align:middle line:84% that there is some importance to some of these issues. 00:49:39.390 --> 00:49:42.530 align:middle line:84% But again, with regard to the housing court, 00:49:42.530 --> 00:49:45.500 align:middle line:84% it is a particularly important court in the Commonwealth. 00:49:45.500 --> 00:49:48.510 align:middle line:84% It does tremendous work of resolving disputes. 00:49:48.510 --> 00:49:51.700 align:middle line:84% And criminal justice reform is also important. 00:49:51.700 --> 00:49:55.230 align:middle line:84% We just raise the issue of expansions 00:49:55.230 --> 00:49:57.030 align:middle line:84% when in fact we are likely looking 00:49:57.030 --> 00:49:59.930 align:middle line:90% at reductions in this budget. 00:49:59.930 --> 00:50:04.120 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President and through you to the distinguished Chair 00:50:04.120 --> 00:50:07.440 align:middle line:84% Lady, one of the things that we have to get our hands around 00:50:07.440 --> 00:50:10.110 align:middle line:84% and one of the cost drivers in this and every budget 00:50:10.110 --> 00:50:12.960 align:middle line:84% is the cost of Medicaid or Mass Health. 00:50:12.960 --> 00:50:15.080 align:middle line:84% So I'm hoping that the distinguished Chair 00:50:15.080 --> 00:50:18.950 align:middle line:84% Lady can explain to us, in this particular budget, what 00:50:18.950 --> 00:50:22.820 align:middle line:84% percentage of spending is the Mass Health program. 00:50:22.820 --> 00:50:26.270 align:middle line:84% And along those same lines, Mr. President, 00:50:26.270 --> 00:50:28.120 align:middle line:84% why there are savings initiatives 00:50:28.120 --> 00:50:30.160 align:middle line:90% contained in the budget. 00:50:30.160 --> 00:50:33.970 align:middle line:84% Because it's one of those areas that 00:50:33.970 --> 00:50:37.160 align:middle line:84% must be addressed if we are to contain and control 00:50:37.160 --> 00:50:40.390 align:middle line:84% state spending so that we can respond to other priorities. 00:50:40.390 --> 00:50:43.720 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:50:43.720 --> 00:50:47.210 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka. 00:50:47.210 --> 00:50:48.980 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:50:48.980 --> 00:50:53.280 align:middle line:84% As we know, Mass Health provides services 00:50:53.280 --> 00:50:57.510 align:middle line:84% to 1.9 million residents here in the Commonwealth, 00:50:57.510 --> 00:51:01.840 align:middle line:84% helping ensure that health insurance coverage is not 00:51:01.840 --> 00:51:05.450 align:middle line:84% a barrier for any of our residents, 00:51:05.450 --> 00:51:08.080 align:middle line:84% especially our low income residents. 00:51:08.080 --> 00:51:17.600 align:middle line:84% Mass Health's spending in this budget totals $16.714 billion. 00:51:17.600 --> 00:51:22.220 align:middle line:84% It is approaching approximately 40% 00:51:22.220 --> 00:51:27.120 align:middle line:84% of our budget for fiscal year 2018. 00:51:27.120 --> 00:51:32.610 align:middle line:84% And that is why the Senate, as I mentioned previously, 00:51:32.610 --> 00:51:37.760 align:middle line:84% is taking steps to try to lower the overall cost of health care 00:51:37.760 --> 00:51:40.350 align:middle line:84% with the working group that we have been working-- 00:51:40.350 --> 00:51:43.070 align:middle line:84% many of the senators have been working on. 00:51:43.070 --> 00:51:49.500 align:middle line:84% So this is something that the Senate is keeping its eye on. 00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:52.670 align:middle line:84% We also take some steps as was mentioned 00:51:52.670 --> 00:51:55.200 align:middle line:84% with the assessment or EMAC to tide us 00:51:55.200 --> 00:51:57.200 align:middle line:90% through a couple of years. 00:51:57.200 --> 00:52:00.890 align:middle line:84% But in recognition that we need to help particularly 00:52:00.890 --> 00:52:04.390 align:middle line:84% the small businesses here, we created 00:52:04.390 --> 00:52:09.480 align:middle line:84% in the budget a Connector public awareness campaign. 00:52:09.480 --> 00:52:12.770 align:middle line:84% We found in meeting with some of the businesses, particularly 00:52:12.770 --> 00:52:15.200 align:middle line:84% the small businesses, some were not 00:52:15.200 --> 00:52:19.290 align:middle line:84% aware of the tools that were already offered 00:52:19.290 --> 00:52:22.390 align:middle line:84% and products available through the Connector. 00:52:22.390 --> 00:52:27.530 align:middle line:84% So we think an enhanced public awareness campaign would help. 00:52:27.530 --> 00:52:32.300 align:middle line:84% We also create a group purchasing cooperative task 00:52:32.300 --> 00:52:35.780 align:middle line:84% force to improve the affordability 00:52:35.780 --> 00:52:39.980 align:middle line:84% and efficacy of group purchasing cooperatives. 00:52:39.980 --> 00:52:43.050 align:middle line:90% That would also lower costs. 00:52:43.050 --> 00:52:46.820 align:middle line:84% The other initiative that we do is 00:52:46.820 --> 00:52:51.770 align:middle line:84% we direct the Connector to have a premium sharing feasibility 00:52:51.770 --> 00:52:52.800 align:middle line:90% study. 00:52:52.800 --> 00:52:57.860 align:middle line:84% So that would look at establishing small employer 00:52:57.860 --> 00:53:01.060 align:middle line:84% premiums, a sharing plan for the coverage 00:53:01.060 --> 00:53:05.230 align:middle line:84% of individuals that are eligible to be on Mass Health 00:53:05.230 --> 00:53:08.120 align:middle line:84% where the employer could contribute 00:53:08.120 --> 00:53:11.930 align:middle line:84% a certain amount for the eligible employees, 00:53:11.930 --> 00:53:15.530 align:middle line:84% their eligible employees, to help pay for that. 00:53:15.530 --> 00:53:19.640 align:middle line:84% So there's just a few-- and that again is just a few 00:53:19.640 --> 00:53:24.570 align:middle line:84% of some of the initiatives that we have taken in this budget 00:53:24.570 --> 00:53:30.030 align:middle line:84% to try to continue to lower the overall cost of health care. 00:53:30.030 --> 00:53:31.689 align:middle line:90% Senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 00:53:31.689 --> 00:53:32.730 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 00:53:32.730 --> 00:53:34.410 align:middle line:90% I appreciate the explanation. 00:53:34.410 --> 00:53:37.130 align:middle line:84% And I do think that it's critically important that we 00:53:37.130 --> 00:53:40.420 align:middle line:84% continue to work on controlling the cost of health care 00:53:40.420 --> 00:53:42.560 align:middle line:84% in general, and more specifically 00:53:42.560 --> 00:53:45.860 align:middle line:84% on trying to control our Mass Health costs because they 00:53:45.860 --> 00:53:46.770 align:middle line:90% are important. 00:53:46.770 --> 00:53:48.670 align:middle line:84% It's important that we deliver coverage 00:53:48.670 --> 00:53:50.680 align:middle line:84% and that we ensure health care coverage. 00:53:50.680 --> 00:53:52.820 align:middle line:84% But it's also important that we're 00:53:52.820 --> 00:53:56.470 align:middle line:84% expanding its availability, we ensure that it does not, 00:53:56.470 --> 00:53:58.830 align:middle line:84% by virtue of its cost requirements, 00:53:58.830 --> 00:54:01.600 align:middle line:84% devour other available resources that could 00:54:01.600 --> 00:54:03.920 align:middle line:90% be spent on other things. 00:54:03.920 --> 00:54:06.720 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, the distinguished Chair Lady of Ways and Means 00:54:06.720 --> 00:54:10.680 align:middle line:84% has answered a variety of very complex questions. 00:54:10.680 --> 00:54:12.910 align:middle line:90% And I appreciate those answers. 00:54:12.910 --> 00:54:17.240 align:middle line:84% And not only the answers, but the knowledge and the focus 00:54:17.240 --> 00:54:19.300 align:middle line:84% that enables her to provide them. 00:54:19.300 --> 00:54:22.420 align:middle line:84% But now, Mr. President, perhaps the most difficult question 00:54:22.420 --> 00:54:25.850 align:middle line:84% of all, and I'm hoping to test her expertise 00:54:25.850 --> 00:54:29.040 align:middle line:84% and since has done so well in providing us with information 00:54:29.040 --> 00:54:30.100 align:middle line:90% on other things. 00:54:30.100 --> 00:54:32.940 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'm hoping she can tell us, 00:54:32.940 --> 00:54:37.540 align:middle line:84% can the Boston Celtics win the NBA Championship. 00:54:37.540 --> 00:54:44.370 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Middlesex and Norfolk. 00:54:44.370 --> 00:54:47.140 align:middle line:84% In trying to get out my crystal ball, 00:54:47.140 --> 00:54:50.840 align:middle line:84% I would remind the leader of a score 00:54:50.840 --> 00:54:55.280 align:middle line:84% of a somewhat recent, famous in our parts, football game 00:54:55.280 --> 00:54:57.110 align:middle line:90% earlier this year. 00:54:57.110 --> 00:54:59.310 align:middle line:90% 28 to 3. 00:54:59.310 --> 00:55:02.550 align:middle line:84% And simply suggest that in Boston 00:55:02.550 --> 00:55:04.890 align:middle line:84% and in Massachusetts, anything is possible. 00:55:04.890 --> 00:55:07.440 align:middle line:90% 00:55:07.440 --> 00:55:09.620 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex wants to talk. 00:55:09.620 --> 00:55:13.450 align:middle line:84% I so appreciate that answer, because whether it's 28 to 3, 00:55:13.450 --> 00:55:18.510 align:middle line:84% or two games to one, or 33 to 6, anything 00:55:18.510 --> 00:55:20.700 align:middle line:84% can happen in Massachusetts, and we hope 00:55:20.700 --> 00:55:22.620 align:middle line:90% that it will in this budget. 00:55:22.620 --> 00:55:26.530 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I appreciate the explanation. 00:55:26.530 --> 00:55:29.490 align:middle line:84% I would just take a moment to explain 00:55:29.490 --> 00:55:31.500 align:middle line:90% part of why we're concerned. 00:55:31.500 --> 00:55:32.960 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we know that there 00:55:32.960 --> 00:55:35.820 align:middle line:84% is an agreement on consensus revenue, 00:55:35.820 --> 00:55:39.250 align:middle line:84% but we also know that situations are changing, 00:55:39.250 --> 00:55:42.770 align:middle line:84% and that revenue trends are concerning with regard 00:55:42.770 --> 00:55:44.880 align:middle line:90% to supporting that consensus. 00:55:44.880 --> 00:55:47.760 align:middle line:84% And so we want to ensure in Minority Crescent 00:55:47.760 --> 00:55:50.250 align:middle line:84% that at some point we don't engage in concealment 00:55:50.250 --> 00:55:52.990 align:middle line:84% by consensus, and that we actually acknowledge 00:55:52.990 --> 00:55:54.730 align:middle line:90% that there is a problem. 00:55:54.730 --> 00:55:58.370 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, we have been hard at work 00:55:58.370 --> 00:56:01.280 align:middle line:84% in the Minority Print Shop, and this chart 00:56:01.280 --> 00:56:05.070 align:middle line:84% comes to us from the Minority Innovation Chamber. 00:56:05.070 --> 00:56:08.490 align:middle line:84% And it is a very simple one, given some of the other charts 00:56:08.490 --> 00:56:09.690 align:middle line:90% that we may be sharing. 00:56:09.690 --> 00:56:11.990 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, you don't need the calculator yet. 00:56:11.990 --> 00:56:13.940 align:middle line:90% This one's very easy. 00:56:13.940 --> 00:56:18.580 align:middle line:84% So we can make this available, and Mr. President, it 00:56:18.580 --> 00:56:20.820 align:middle line:84% will be available in framed version 00:56:20.820 --> 00:56:22.330 align:middle line:90% after the budget debate. 00:56:22.330 --> 00:56:25.270 align:middle line:84% For those that would like one for their home or office, 00:56:25.270 --> 00:56:27.710 align:middle line:84% they also make wonderful holiday gifts. 00:56:27.710 --> 00:56:30.860 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, this very simple chart 00:56:30.860 --> 00:56:34.780 align:middle line:84% indicates on the bottom line state revenues. 00:56:34.780 --> 00:56:41.240 align:middle line:84% And this is starting in 2009, and moving forward till 2017, 00:56:41.240 --> 00:56:44.140 align:middle line:90% and then projecting 2018. 00:56:44.140 --> 00:56:47.110 align:middle line:84% And then, Mr. President, looking at spending 00:56:47.110 --> 00:56:48.790 align:middle line:90% in those same parameters. 00:56:48.790 --> 00:56:49.920 align:middle line:90% And you can see-- 00:56:49.920 --> 00:56:53.220 align:middle line:84% and for those members that might like to see it, 00:56:53.220 --> 00:56:54.330 align:middle line:90% I'm turning this way. 00:56:54.330 --> 00:56:55.980 align:middle line:84% I know that you're being distracted, 00:56:55.980 --> 00:56:58.830 align:middle line:90% but I think this is important. 00:56:58.830 --> 00:57:01.680 align:middle line:84% And so Mr. President, this indicates the delta 00:57:01.680 --> 00:57:04.320 align:middle line:90% of spending versus revenue. 00:57:04.320 --> 00:57:06.880 align:middle line:84% And this is not something, Mr. President, 00:57:06.880 --> 00:57:09.390 align:middle line:84% that has happened in the last year. 00:57:09.390 --> 00:57:12.450 align:middle line:84% It is something that continues to be concerning, 00:57:12.450 --> 00:57:17.850 align:middle line:84% and it is why we oftentimes try to reiterate the point over 00:57:17.850 --> 00:57:20.340 align:middle line:84% and again about the need to initiate 00:57:20.340 --> 00:57:24.010 align:middle line:84% important cost-saving measures, as well as noble spending 00:57:24.010 --> 00:57:27.020 align:middle line:84% measures to respond to priorities that many of us 00:57:27.020 --> 00:57:27.900 align:middle line:90% share. 00:57:27.900 --> 00:57:31.530 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, again, the chart will be going away here 00:57:31.530 --> 00:57:34.990 align:middle line:84% momentarily, but it will be available for inspection 00:57:34.990 --> 00:57:36.860 align:middle line:84% throughout the debate upon request. 00:57:36.860 --> 00:57:39.220 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'm not sure if folks can see it 00:57:39.220 --> 00:57:41.070 align:middle line:84% in the gallery, so I'll just tilt it back 00:57:41.070 --> 00:57:43.430 align:middle line:84% a little bit if you happen to be in the right gallery 00:57:43.430 --> 00:57:44.660 align:middle line:90% so that you can see it. 00:57:44.660 --> 00:57:48.390 align:middle line:84% And so I raise this, Mr. President, as a point 00:57:48.390 --> 00:57:52.890 align:middle line:84% that we need to be concerned about the level 00:57:52.890 --> 00:57:55.310 align:middle line:84% of our spending, and the rate of our spending. 00:57:55.310 --> 00:57:57.680 align:middle line:84% And particularly, Mr. President, it's 00:57:57.680 --> 00:58:00.650 align:middle line:84% important to note that we have issues, perhaps, 00:58:00.650 --> 00:58:03.560 align:middle line:84% on both sides of spending, discretionary and 00:58:03.560 --> 00:58:05.230 align:middle line:90% non-discretionary spending. 00:58:05.230 --> 00:58:07.990 align:middle line:84% And that's why it's important to bear that in mind 00:58:07.990 --> 00:58:09.960 align:middle line:90% as we begin this debate. 00:58:09.960 --> 00:58:13.640 align:middle line:84% And I know that the chairlady of Ways and Means 00:58:13.640 --> 00:58:14.780 align:middle line:90% understands that. 00:58:14.780 --> 00:58:17.530 align:middle line:84% I know that she's tried to program in some savings 00:58:17.530 --> 00:58:18.140 align:middle line:90% initiatives. 00:58:18.140 --> 00:58:21.490 align:middle line:84% We plan to offer some more, because Mr. President, 00:58:21.490 --> 00:58:25.250 align:middle line:90% we cannot continue on that path. 00:58:25.250 --> 00:58:27.830 align:middle line:84% And I know, Mr. President, that there 00:58:27.830 --> 00:58:32.180 align:middle line:84% are some who think that we can take a magic marker 00:58:32.180 --> 00:58:34.940 align:middle line:84% and connect those lines by imposing 00:58:34.940 --> 00:58:39.370 align:middle line:84% a surtax on a particularly small but significant group 00:58:39.370 --> 00:58:43.680 align:middle line:84% of taxpayers in the Commonwealth within the next several months 00:58:43.680 --> 00:58:45.090 align:middle line:90% through another initiative. 00:58:45.090 --> 00:58:47.400 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, I would suggest to you 00:58:47.400 --> 00:58:50.920 align:middle line:84% that that chart suggests the fundamental problem 00:58:50.920 --> 00:58:53.810 align:middle line:84% that we have that needs to be addressed, 00:58:53.810 --> 00:58:57.290 align:middle line:84% and that we need to consider as we take up this budget. 00:58:57.290 --> 00:59:00.930 align:middle line:84% The budget that pends before us now before the Senate 00:59:00.930 --> 00:59:03.430 align:middle line:84% as a result of the good work of the Committee on Ways 00:59:03.430 --> 00:59:07.300 align:middle line:84% and Means, again, includes many important things. 00:59:07.300 --> 00:59:10.290 align:middle line:84% And I'm going to call attention, again, to the Foundation Budget 00:59:10.290 --> 00:59:13.750 align:middle line:84% Review Commission, which was an important initiative that 00:59:13.750 --> 00:59:18.610 align:middle line:84% took many years even to happen, Mr. President. 00:59:18.610 --> 00:59:21.050 align:middle line:84% That review was supposed to start shortly 00:59:21.050 --> 00:59:27.240 align:middle line:84% after we originally passed the Education Reform Act of 1993. 00:59:27.240 --> 00:59:29.160 align:middle line:84% And but for the extraordinary work 00:59:29.160 --> 00:59:31.160 align:middle line:84% of people in this chamber who were 00:59:31.160 --> 00:59:34.310 align:middle line:84% passionate and committed to getting the Foundation Budget 00:59:34.310 --> 00:59:37.820 align:middle line:84% Review Commission reorganized and revitalized, 00:59:37.820 --> 00:59:40.610 align:middle line:84% we would not even be able to talk about some 00:59:40.610 --> 00:59:42.680 align:middle line:84% of the recommendations that are in this budget. 00:59:42.680 --> 00:59:43.970 align:middle line:90% Fortunately, we are. 00:59:43.970 --> 00:59:46.570 align:middle line:84% We think we can improve upon some of the things 00:59:46.570 --> 00:59:49.300 align:middle line:84% that are done, but that is not to say that we should not 00:59:49.300 --> 00:59:52.930 align:middle line:84% recognize the fact that the budget-- 00:59:52.930 --> 00:59:54.900 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we were talking about basketball 00:59:54.900 --> 00:59:55.650 align:middle line:90% a few moments ago. 00:59:55.650 --> 00:59:58.500 align:middle line:84% I know that you were referring to baseball on the rostrum, 00:59:58.500 --> 01:00:00.740 align:middle line:84% but basketball, it's the one with the hoop. 01:00:00.740 --> 01:00:03.830 align:middle line:84% So at any rate, Madam President-- 01:00:03.830 --> 01:00:05.380 align:middle line:90% Mr. President-- 01:00:05.380 --> 01:00:06.910 align:middle line:84% We started in Springfield, right? 01:00:06.910 --> 01:00:08.270 align:middle line:90% We're all over the board here. 01:00:08.270 --> 01:00:12.840 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, I think it's important to recognize 01:00:12.840 --> 01:00:15.520 align:middle line:84% that we do have things like the Foundation Budget Review 01:00:15.520 --> 01:00:16.350 align:middle line:90% Commission. 01:00:16.350 --> 01:00:21.140 align:middle line:84% We do have funding for a number of important priorities. 01:00:21.140 --> 01:00:23.800 align:middle line:84% But as we move forward with those, 01:00:23.800 --> 01:00:27.390 align:middle line:84% we need to ensure that at some point in the future, 01:00:27.390 --> 01:00:31.620 align:middle line:84% our commitment to those will not be compromised 01:00:31.620 --> 01:00:36.430 align:middle line:84% by a fiscal situation that raises a red flag of caution 01:00:36.430 --> 01:00:38.970 align:middle line:90% for all of us to consider. 01:00:38.970 --> 01:00:41.060 align:middle line:84% As we move through this debate, we 01:00:41.060 --> 01:00:43.750 align:middle line:84% plan to offer a number of initiatives that will 01:00:43.750 --> 01:00:46.050 align:middle line:90% try to help address that issue. 01:00:46.050 --> 01:00:49.180 align:middle line:84% And we do so not because we think 01:00:49.180 --> 01:00:51.270 align:middle line:84% that the Senate Committee on Ways and Means 01:00:51.270 --> 01:00:53.560 align:middle line:90% is unsympathetic to that goal. 01:00:53.560 --> 01:00:55.080 align:middle line:90% Quite the contrary. 01:00:55.080 --> 01:00:58.410 align:middle line:84% We do so because we know the Senate Committee on Ways 01:00:58.410 --> 01:01:02.170 align:middle line:84% and Means and its chair are interested in pursuing 01:01:02.170 --> 01:01:05.050 align:middle line:84% reasonable cost-savings initiatives. 01:01:05.050 --> 01:01:08.530 align:middle line:84% And we hope that we can meet in the middle 01:01:08.530 --> 01:01:12.260 align:middle line:84% and be able to include some of those additional items 01:01:12.260 --> 01:01:16.030 align:middle line:84% into this budget as we move forward. 01:01:16.030 --> 01:01:18.620 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, as the budget moves 01:01:18.620 --> 01:01:22.460 align:middle line:84% forward toward what I would consider to be somewhat 01:01:22.460 --> 01:01:24.200 align:middle line:90% of an uncertain future-- 01:01:24.200 --> 01:01:26.960 align:middle line:84% not through the making of folks in this chamber, 01:01:26.960 --> 01:01:30.930 align:middle line:84% but as a result of the climate that we face. 01:01:30.930 --> 01:01:34.650 align:middle line:84% Which presents us with many vexing challenges. 01:01:34.650 --> 01:01:36.760 align:middle line:84% Particularly as we-- and it's been 01:01:36.760 --> 01:01:40.590 align:middle line:84% referred to by the chair of the Committee on Ways and Means. 01:01:40.590 --> 01:01:44.740 align:middle line:84% Particularly as we experience, in terms of unemployment rates 01:01:44.740 --> 01:01:50.100 align:middle line:84% and other indicators, a robust economic recovery. 01:01:50.100 --> 01:01:52.420 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, we are not seeing 01:01:52.420 --> 01:01:54.950 align:middle line:84% the kind of consensus revenue that 01:01:54.950 --> 01:01:58.550 align:middle line:84% has been projected as a result of that recovery. 01:01:58.550 --> 01:02:01.680 align:middle line:84% It is a fundamental issue, and we 01:02:01.680 --> 01:02:05.400 align:middle line:84% raise it to ensure that it is in the minds of all of us 01:02:05.400 --> 01:02:08.990 align:middle line:84% as we continue to debate this very challenging budget. 01:02:08.990 --> 01:02:12.560 align:middle line:90% We raise it not as a derogation. 01:02:12.560 --> 01:02:15.000 align:middle line:90% We raise it not as a criticism. 01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:18.220 align:middle line:84% We raise it as a point of deep concern. 01:02:18.220 --> 01:02:20.960 align:middle line:84% And we raise it because we know others share it, 01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:24.100 align:middle line:84% and that we will hopefully have debate 01:02:24.100 --> 01:02:27.450 align:middle line:84% that resonates with that very sobering reality 01:02:27.450 --> 01:02:29.510 align:middle line:84% about the situation that we're in. 01:02:29.510 --> 01:02:32.440 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, we look forward to the debate, 01:02:32.440 --> 01:02:35.770 align:middle line:84% and we look forward to the several amendments. 01:02:35.770 --> 01:02:39.570 align:middle line:84% I believe we have over 1,000, Mr. President, 01:02:39.570 --> 01:02:43.070 align:middle line:84% and I will accept responsibility for my share of those. 01:02:43.070 --> 01:02:44.840 align:middle line:84% But we look forward to the debate. 01:02:44.840 --> 01:02:46.340 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:02:46.340 --> 01:02:50.400 align:middle line:84% [AUDIO OUT] have been presented, which we will 01:02:50.400 --> 01:02:52.190 align:middle line:90% begin to debate at this time. 01:02:52.190 --> 01:02:55.860 align:middle line:84% But first, offered by the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr, 01:02:55.860 --> 01:02:57.720 align:middle line:90% number 1 is on hold. 01:02:57.720 --> 01:03:00.550 align:middle line:84% The same senator offers number 2, the title 01:03:00.550 --> 01:03:01.960 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:03:01.960 --> 01:03:05.340 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 2 by Mr. Tarr, Senior Citizen Property Tax 01:03:05.340 --> 01:03:06.330 align:middle line:90% Relief. 01:03:06.330 --> 01:03:08.700 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:03:08.700 --> 01:03:10.470 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we have a long way to go, 01:03:10.470 --> 01:03:13.760 align:middle line:84% and I hope to lighten the load by requesting 01:03:13.760 --> 01:03:16.469 align:middle line:84% unanimous consent to withdraw the pending amendment. 01:03:16.469 --> 01:03:18.510 align:middle line:84% Gentleman asks consent to withdraw the amendment. 01:03:18.510 --> 01:03:19.426 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:03:19.426 --> 01:03:20.480 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:03:20.480 --> 01:03:21.304 align:middle line:90% It is so ordered. 01:03:21.304 --> 01:03:23.720 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 3, offered by the same senator, the title 01:03:23.720 --> 01:03:25.620 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:03:25.620 --> 01:03:29.140 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 3 by Mr. Tarr, Expanding the Mandated Reported 01:03:29.140 --> 01:03:30.090 align:middle line:90% Definition. 01:03:30.090 --> 01:03:31.902 align:middle line:90% Senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:03:31.902 --> 01:03:34.110 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through to the members. 01:03:34.110 --> 01:03:37.470 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, this is a very straightforward matter 01:03:37.470 --> 01:03:40.620 align:middle line:84% to expand the definition of who in the Commonwealth 01:03:40.620 --> 01:03:44.620 align:middle line:84% is a mandated reporter with regard to neglect or child 01:03:44.620 --> 01:03:45.230 align:middle line:90% abuse. 01:03:45.230 --> 01:03:49.100 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, we all know that certain professionals, 01:03:49.100 --> 01:03:52.410 align:middle line:84% medical, law enforcement, education, and mental health, 01:03:52.410 --> 01:03:54.350 align:middle line:90% are mandated reporters. 01:03:54.350 --> 01:03:58.310 align:middle line:84% And if abuse or neglect of a child is suspected or detected, 01:03:58.310 --> 01:04:01.400 align:middle line:84% those reporters are required to file 01:04:01.400 --> 01:04:05.520 align:middle line:84% a report about that suspicion with the Department of Children 01:04:05.520 --> 01:04:06.940 align:middle line:90% and Families. 01:04:06.940 --> 01:04:10.410 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, this amendment adds a new outside section 01:04:10.410 --> 01:04:15.280 align:middle line:84% to the budget, expanding those mandated reporters 01:04:15.280 --> 01:04:18.740 align:middle line:84% to include public and private school employees, people 01:04:18.740 --> 01:04:21.910 align:middle line:84% who care or work for a child in any public or private child 01:04:21.910 --> 01:04:25.370 align:middle line:84% care facility, volunteers who regularly work with children 01:04:25.370 --> 01:04:27.850 align:middle line:84% as part of a team or organization, 01:04:27.850 --> 01:04:31.190 align:middle line:84% and people who are contracted for landscaping 01:04:31.190 --> 01:04:33.820 align:middle line:84% for public or private school, and employees 01:04:33.820 --> 01:04:34.800 align:middle line:90% of the Commonwealth. 01:04:34.800 --> 01:04:37.040 align:middle line:84% Importantly, Mr. President, this definition 01:04:37.040 --> 01:04:41.070 align:middle line:84% does not include those who are under the age of 18, who 01:04:41.070 --> 01:04:44.060 align:middle line:84% might be in those positions as a result of their affiliation 01:04:44.060 --> 01:04:46.480 align:middle line:90% with a team or an organization. 01:04:46.480 --> 01:04:48.790 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, the amendment also 01:04:48.790 --> 01:04:51.000 align:middle line:84% requires that designated mandated reporters 01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:54.250 align:middle line:84% are required to take child sexual abuse training, 01:04:54.250 --> 01:04:56.620 align:middle line:84% as determined by the Office of the Child 01:04:56.620 --> 01:05:00.930 align:middle line:84% Advocate and the Inter-agency Child Care Welfare Task Force. 01:05:00.930 --> 01:05:04.880 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, I would point out that something in addition 01:05:04.880 --> 01:05:07.920 align:middle line:84% to this budget debate is happening in this chamber 01:05:07.920 --> 01:05:10.110 align:middle line:84% and in this building today, or in this building. 01:05:10.110 --> 01:05:14.830 align:middle line:84% And that is, it's the 17th annual Massachusetts Missing 01:05:14.830 --> 01:05:16.530 align:middle line:90% Children's Day. 01:05:16.530 --> 01:05:19.620 align:middle line:84% And it is occurring downstairs, and we 01:05:19.620 --> 01:05:22.310 align:middle line:84% want to make sure, Mr. President, as we remember 01:05:22.310 --> 01:05:24.430 align:middle line:84% missing children in the Commonwealth, 01:05:24.430 --> 01:05:27.870 align:middle line:84% and remember the many cases, the tragic cases that we have 01:05:27.870 --> 01:05:32.140 align:middle line:84% experienced, that we're doing all within our power to prevent 01:05:32.140 --> 01:05:34.140 align:middle line:90% those cases from occurring. 01:05:34.140 --> 01:05:36.440 align:middle line:84% And to ensure that we have appropriate reporting 01:05:36.440 --> 01:05:36.962 align:middle line:90% mechanisms. 01:05:36.962 --> 01:05:38.920 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I hope the amendment is adopted. 01:05:38.920 --> 01:05:41.790 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] comes on the amendment, the senator 01:05:41.790 --> 01:05:43.470 align:middle line:90% from Essex, Ms. Lovely. 01:05:43.470 --> 01:05:46.830 align:middle line:84% [AUDIO OUT] the gentleman from Essex 01:05:46.830 --> 01:05:48.200 align:middle line:90% for filing this amendment. 01:05:48.200 --> 01:05:51.760 align:middle line:84% I actually have a similar bill that I have filed on childhood 01:05:51.760 --> 01:05:53.200 align:middle line:90% sexual abuse prevention. 01:05:53.200 --> 01:05:54.840 align:middle line:84% I think any method that we can do 01:05:54.840 --> 01:05:57.087 align:middle line:84% to prevent the sexual abuse of children, whether it's 01:05:57.087 --> 01:05:59.170 align:middle line:84% through the budget process or through legislation, 01:05:59.170 --> 01:06:00.380 align:middle line:90% is absolutely necessary. 01:06:00.380 --> 01:06:01.390 align:middle line:84% And I want to thank the gentleman 01:06:01.390 --> 01:06:02.473 align:middle line:90% for filing this amendment. 01:06:02.473 --> 01:06:03.107 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:06:03.107 --> 01:06:04.940 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:06:04.940 --> 01:06:06.390 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:06:06.390 --> 01:06:07.490 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:06:07.490 --> 01:06:08.230 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:06:08.230 --> 01:06:09.438 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:06:09.438 --> 01:06:10.410 align:middle line:90% Number 4 is on hold. 01:06:10.410 --> 01:06:13.300 align:middle line:84% Number 5 offered by the senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, 01:06:13.300 --> 01:06:13.810 align:middle line:90% Ms. Creem. 01:06:13.810 --> 01:06:15.680 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:06:15.680 --> 01:06:18.680 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 5 by Ms. Creem, Seasonal Camp Counselors 01:06:18.680 --> 01:06:20.270 align:middle line:90% and Counselor Trainees. 01:06:20.270 --> 01:06:21.950 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:06:21.950 --> 01:06:23.300 align:middle line:90% Well, well, well, Mr. President. 01:06:23.300 --> 01:06:25.050 align:middle line:84% This amendment comes to us by way 01:06:25.050 --> 01:06:27.920 align:middle line:84% of the chamber's perhaps foremost expert on the Uniform 01:06:27.920 --> 01:06:28.990 align:middle line:90% Commercial Code. 01:06:28.990 --> 01:06:33.140 align:middle line:84% But she has spread her wings to another important area, 01:06:33.140 --> 01:06:35.530 align:middle line:84% and I'm hoping that we can hear an explanation 01:06:35.530 --> 01:06:37.764 align:middle line:90% of this particular amendment. 01:06:37.764 --> 01:06:39.680 align:middle line:84% Senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Creem. 01:06:39.680 --> 01:06:42.170 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you 01:06:42.170 --> 01:06:43.850 align:middle line:90% to the minority leader. 01:06:43.850 --> 01:06:47.640 align:middle line:84% From the UCC to the wage laws, thank you very much. 01:06:47.640 --> 01:06:50.140 align:middle line:90% So this amendment is simple. 01:06:50.140 --> 01:06:55.690 align:middle line:84% It clarifies language contained in the 2014 Minimum Wage Law 01:06:55.690 --> 01:06:59.220 align:middle line:84% that we passed to provide for a clear exemption 01:06:59.220 --> 01:07:02.590 align:middle line:90% in the case of camp counselors 01:07:02.590 --> 01:07:06.320 align:middle line:84% Both past chairs of the committee which crafted the law 01:07:06.320 --> 01:07:10.420 align:middle line:84% indicated in letters to the Department of Labor Standards 01:07:10.420 --> 01:07:15.300 align:middle line:84% that the intent was to create a full-time exemption for camp 01:07:15.300 --> 01:07:15.910 align:middle line:90% counselors. 01:07:15.910 --> 01:07:17.910 align:middle line:84% We all know, whether we were camp counselors, 01:07:17.910 --> 01:07:21.350 align:middle line:84% or our kids were happy they have-- doing something, 01:07:21.350 --> 01:07:23.970 align:middle line:84% and they're getting something, if anything, 01:07:23.970 --> 01:07:26.270 align:middle line:90% for their summertime. 01:07:26.270 --> 01:07:29.710 align:middle line:84% This interpretation was also reported by previous director 01:07:29.710 --> 01:07:30.720 align:middle line:90% of the department. 01:07:30.720 --> 01:07:33.630 align:middle line:84% However, because the language is unclear, 01:07:33.630 --> 01:07:38.190 align:middle line:84% current counselors at DLS have indicated 01:07:38.190 --> 01:07:41.140 align:middle line:84% that a strict interpretation of the language 01:07:41.140 --> 01:07:43.880 align:middle line:84% does not support the full exemption. 01:07:43.880 --> 01:07:47.010 align:middle line:84% This is an important issue for summer camps, 01:07:47.010 --> 01:07:50.330 align:middle line:84% which are gearing up for hiring for the upcoming summer. 01:07:50.330 --> 01:07:54.060 align:middle line:84% Most of whom had budgeted under the previous interpretation 01:07:54.060 --> 01:07:55.650 align:middle line:90% of a full exemption. 01:07:55.650 --> 01:07:58.810 align:middle line:84% It is my recollection of the past debate 01:07:58.810 --> 01:08:02.110 align:middle line:84% that a full exemption for camp was intended. 01:08:02.110 --> 01:08:05.490 align:middle line:84% I remember that I thought we voted that, 01:08:05.490 --> 01:08:07.890 align:middle line:90% and that this was the case. 01:08:07.890 --> 01:08:10.490 align:middle line:84% So I would ask your support for this amendment, 01:08:10.490 --> 01:08:13.230 align:middle line:84% to make our intent as clear as possible. 01:08:13.230 --> 01:08:14.270 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:08:14.270 --> 01:08:16.350 align:middle line:84% Question of adoption of the amendment. 01:08:16.350 --> 01:08:17.550 align:middle line:90% All those in favor-- ah. 01:08:17.550 --> 01:08:22.720 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes that the senator from Plymouth 01:08:22.720 --> 01:08:25.979 align:middle line:84% and Barnstable, Mr. DeMacedo, wishes to speak on the matter. 01:08:25.979 --> 01:08:27.410 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:08:27.410 --> 01:08:30.600 align:middle line:84% Appreciate the opportunity, and thank you to the senator 01:08:30.600 --> 01:08:31.890 align:middle line:90% for bringing this issue up. 01:08:31.890 --> 01:08:35.090 align:middle line:84% I think that clearly that was the intention 01:08:35.090 --> 01:08:38.319 align:middle line:84% of this legislature in trying to address the needs, 01:08:38.319 --> 01:08:42.010 align:middle line:84% and also be responsive to our many summer 01:08:42.010 --> 01:08:45.670 align:middle line:84% camps, the YMCA, and the whole others that provide 01:08:45.670 --> 01:08:49.580 align:middle line:84% such an important and needed respite for so 01:08:49.580 --> 01:08:52.140 align:middle line:84% many young people around the Commonwealth. 01:08:52.140 --> 01:08:53.870 align:middle line:90% And we're thrilled about that. 01:08:53.870 --> 01:08:56.729 align:middle line:84% But to that point, I think that I just 01:08:56.729 --> 01:08:59.590 align:middle line:84% want to make a point that I support this. 01:08:59.590 --> 01:09:02.130 align:middle line:84% But I also want to make a point that there's reasons 01:09:02.130 --> 01:09:03.240 align:middle line:90% that we have exemptions. 01:09:03.240 --> 01:09:04.510 align:middle line:90% Because they make sense. 01:09:04.510 --> 01:09:06.100 align:middle line:84% And there are other opportunities 01:09:06.100 --> 01:09:09.140 align:middle line:84% that I think that we can do to make sense in regards 01:09:09.140 --> 01:09:13.180 align:middle line:84% to the issue of minimum wage, because there are certain-- 01:09:13.180 --> 01:09:17.410 align:middle line:84% often times, people that go into the minimum wage 01:09:17.410 --> 01:09:19.689 align:middle line:84% are individuals that are just learning. 01:09:19.689 --> 01:09:21.680 align:middle line:84% A training wage that they can just learn 01:09:21.680 --> 01:09:23.430 align:middle line:90% for a short window of time. 01:09:23.430 --> 01:09:26.300 align:middle line:84% Because not everybody is at a living wage 01:09:26.300 --> 01:09:30.319 align:middle line:84% trying to take care of and support a family. 01:09:30.319 --> 01:09:34.529 align:middle line:84% So as we address this exemption, congratulations. 01:09:34.529 --> 01:09:36.810 align:middle line:84% It makes a ton of sense, and I will support it. 01:09:36.810 --> 01:09:40.060 align:middle line:84% But I also want to make the point now, 01:09:40.060 --> 01:09:42.220 align:middle line:84% since we are discussing it, that we 01:09:42.220 --> 01:09:45.720 align:middle line:84% have to consider this as we look at the whole Minimum Wage Law 01:09:45.720 --> 01:09:46.569 align:middle line:90% as a whole. 01:09:46.569 --> 01:09:48.500 align:middle line:84% Because there are other exemptions 01:09:48.500 --> 01:09:51.649 align:middle line:84% that we might do that would help young people 01:09:51.649 --> 01:09:55.390 align:middle line:84% get into the system, and be able to have a job where they 01:09:55.390 --> 01:09:57.030 align:middle line:90% otherwise wouldn't have a job. 01:09:57.030 --> 01:09:59.560 align:middle line:84% We want to create opportunities for employment. 01:09:59.560 --> 01:10:02.020 align:middle line:84% And especially for those younger kids 01:10:02.020 --> 01:10:04.539 align:middle line:84% that just want a short-term job, the first job 01:10:04.539 --> 01:10:05.830 align:middle line:90% that they're ever going to get. 01:10:05.830 --> 01:10:06.700 align:middle line:90% Create a training wage. 01:10:06.700 --> 01:10:08.574 align:middle line:84% So with that, I just want to congratulate you 01:10:08.574 --> 01:10:11.610 align:middle line:84% for taking this on, and to also highlight an opportunity 01:10:11.610 --> 01:10:13.840 align:middle line:84% that I'm sure we're going to be addressing 01:10:13.840 --> 01:10:18.181 align:middle line:84% this issue in the future, and highlight why it's always 01:10:18.181 --> 01:10:18.680 align:middle line:90% necessary. 01:10:18.680 --> 01:10:20.664 align:middle line:84% So thank you very much for the [INAUDIBLE].. 01:10:20.664 --> 01:10:22.830 align:middle line:84% Now the question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:10:22.830 --> 01:10:24.230 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:10:24.230 --> 01:10:25.270 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:10:25.270 --> 01:10:27.820 align:middle line:84% The Ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 01:10:27.820 --> 01:10:29.850 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 6 is on hold. 01:10:29.850 --> 01:10:31.950 align:middle line:84% Number 7 is offered by the senator from Essex 01:10:31.950 --> 01:10:33.880 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Ms. L'Italien, the title 01:10:33.880 --> 01:10:35.290 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:10:35.290 --> 01:10:37.090 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 7 by Ms. L'Italien, 01:10:37.090 --> 01:10:41.317 align:middle line:84% LGBT Aging Commission Reporting Technical Amendment. 01:10:41.317 --> 01:10:43.150 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:10:43.150 --> 01:10:44.630 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:10:44.630 --> 01:10:46.037 align:middle line:90% Why thank you, Mr. President. 01:10:46.037 --> 01:10:47.620 align:middle line:84% This is the First Amendment that we've 01:10:47.620 --> 01:10:49.880 align:middle line:84% seen from the gentle lady from the Merrimack Valley, 01:10:49.880 --> 01:10:53.360 align:middle line:84% and I'm hoping that we can get one of her usual sterling 01:10:53.360 --> 01:10:55.050 align:middle line:84% explanations of what it contains. 01:10:55.050 --> 01:10:57.240 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:10:57.240 --> 01:11:00.420 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex, Ms. L'Italien. 01:11:00.420 --> 01:11:02.120 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:11:02.120 --> 01:11:07.310 align:middle line:84% As chair of Elder Affairs, the LGBT Aging Commission 01:11:07.310 --> 01:11:09.840 align:middle line:90% falls under my jurisdiction. 01:11:09.840 --> 01:11:13.060 align:middle line:84% The group that meets on a regular basis 01:11:13.060 --> 01:11:17.340 align:middle line:84% had asked that we change their requirement from annually 01:11:17.340 --> 01:11:19.020 align:middle line:90% to every two years. 01:11:19.020 --> 01:11:21.100 align:middle line:84% They feel that they'd be better served 01:11:21.100 --> 01:11:26.230 align:middle line:84% by reporting every two years, by December 31 on even years. 01:11:26.230 --> 01:11:29.304 align:middle line:84% But should we want them to file more often, 01:11:29.304 --> 01:11:30.970 align:middle line:84% they would certainly be able to do that. 01:11:30.970 --> 01:11:32.975 align:middle line:84% But they feel this would be sufficient. 01:11:32.975 --> 01:11:35.607 align:middle line:90% 01:11:35.607 --> 01:11:37.440 align:middle line:84% Question comes an adoption of the amendment. 01:11:37.440 --> 01:11:38.740 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:11:38.740 --> 01:11:39.850 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:11:39.850 --> 01:11:40.800 align:middle line:90% The Ayes have it. 01:11:40.800 --> 01:11:41.970 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:11:41.970 --> 01:11:44.110 align:middle line:84% The next offered by the same senator 01:11:44.110 --> 01:11:47.457 align:middle line:84% from Essex and Middlesex, the title of which 01:11:47.457 --> 01:11:48.290 align:middle line:90% the clerk will read. 01:11:48.290 --> 01:11:51.610 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 8 by Ms. L'Italien, LGBT Awareness 01:11:51.610 --> 01:11:54.027 align:middle line:84% Training for Aging Services Providers. 01:11:54.027 --> 01:11:55.860 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:11:55.860 --> 01:11:57.220 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye." 01:11:57.220 --> 01:11:58.230 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:11:58.230 --> 01:11:58.990 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:11:58.990 --> 01:12:00.350 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:12:00.350 --> 01:12:01.884 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 9 is on hold. 01:12:01.884 --> 01:12:03.800 align:middle line:84% Number 10 is offered by the senator from Essex 01:12:03.800 --> 01:12:07.210 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr, is also on hold. 01:12:07.210 --> 01:12:09.470 align:middle line:84% And we are now on number 11, offered 01:12:09.470 --> 01:12:12.060 align:middle line:84% by the same senator, the title of which the clerk will read. 01:12:12.060 --> 01:12:15.950 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 11 by Mr. Tarr, Room Occupancy Tax 01:12:15.950 --> 01:12:17.310 align:middle line:90% Modernization. 01:12:17.310 --> 01:12:18.810 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the amendment. 01:12:18.810 --> 01:12:20.270 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:12:20.270 --> 01:12:21.050 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:12:21.050 --> 01:12:22.520 align:middle line:84% I move the Senate be in a brief recess. 01:12:22.520 --> 01:12:24.061 align:middle line:84% The Senate will be in a brief recess. 01:12:24.061 --> 01:12:44.760 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, I know that a number of members 01:12:44.760 --> 01:12:47.330 align:middle line:84% have not had an opportunity yet to make reservations, 01:12:47.330 --> 01:12:49.810 align:middle line:84% and so I move that this amendment be temporarily held. 01:12:49.810 --> 01:12:53.885 align:middle line:84% The gentleman asks that amendment number 11 be held. 01:12:53.885 --> 01:12:55.260 align:middle line:84% We're now on amendment number 12, 01:12:55.260 --> 01:12:58.492 align:middle line:84% offered by the same senator, and the title 01:12:58.492 --> 01:12:59.700 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:12:59.700 --> 01:13:03.837 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 12 by Mr. Tarr, Restoring the Income Tax to 5%. 01:13:03.837 --> 01:13:05.670 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:13:05.670 --> 01:13:07.640 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:13:07.640 --> 01:13:09.660 align:middle line:90% Well, well, well, Mr. President. 01:13:09.660 --> 01:13:12.120 align:middle line:84% We had in a discussion earlier, and I 01:13:12.120 --> 01:13:15.410 align:middle line:84% think it's important that that discussion be on the record, 01:13:15.410 --> 01:13:18.110 align:middle line:84% relative to when tax increases are intended 01:13:18.110 --> 01:13:20.910 align:middle line:90% to be temporary or permanent. 01:13:20.910 --> 01:13:24.760 align:middle line:84% And the subject of the instant tax measure 01:13:24.760 --> 01:13:30.460 align:middle line:84% was in 1989 described as a temporary 18-month tax 01:13:30.460 --> 01:13:32.900 align:middle line:90% increase of the income tax. 01:13:32.900 --> 01:13:36.180 align:middle line:84% Well, Mr. President, 16 years later, 01:13:36.180 --> 01:13:39.900 align:middle line:84% as opposed to 16 months later, the income tax 01:13:39.900 --> 01:13:43.510 align:middle line:84% had not been reduced to its original 5%. 01:13:43.510 --> 01:13:46.640 align:middle line:90% And the voters decided to act. 01:13:46.640 --> 01:13:50.710 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, that happened in 2000, and the voters 01:13:50.710 --> 01:13:53.020 align:middle line:84% once again said, yes, this was intended 01:13:53.020 --> 01:13:55.260 align:middle line:84% to be a temporary measure, and it should 01:13:55.260 --> 01:13:57.700 align:middle line:90% be-- the rate should be 5%. 01:13:57.700 --> 01:14:01.340 align:middle line:84% Well, lo and behold, Mr. President, 01:14:01.340 --> 01:14:06.160 align:middle line:84% after the 2003 requirement for that, there was a freeze. 01:14:06.160 --> 01:14:11.910 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, it has been a very, very slow thawing period 01:14:11.910 --> 01:14:14.390 align:middle line:90% to unfreeze that reduction. 01:14:14.390 --> 01:14:17.750 align:middle line:84% And so Mr. President, this simple amendment 01:14:17.750 --> 01:14:21.860 align:middle line:84% would reduce the tax in two predictable and logical 01:14:21.860 --> 01:14:27.050 align:middle line:84% decreases, from 5.1 to 5.0 in January 2018. 01:14:27.050 --> 01:14:32.890 align:middle line:84% And finally, to 5% in January 2019. 01:14:32.890 --> 01:14:38.070 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, we are engaged in a budget that has 01:14:38.070 --> 01:14:40.190 align:middle line:90% historic high spending rates. 01:14:40.190 --> 01:14:44.200 align:middle line:84% We are initiating a number of new programs. 01:14:44.200 --> 01:14:47.060 align:middle line:84% And it seems that we, once again, 01:14:47.060 --> 01:14:49.910 align:middle line:84% tend to forget some of the dimensions of budgeting. 01:14:49.910 --> 01:14:53.660 align:middle line:84% And that is some relief for the people who pay the bills. 01:14:53.660 --> 01:14:58.200 align:middle line:84% And so Mr. President, we offer this amendment to remind us 01:14:58.200 --> 01:15:02.090 align:middle line:84% all that we tend to pay, and should pay, more 01:15:02.090 --> 01:15:06.970 align:middle line:84% particularized attention to the will of the voters. 01:15:06.970 --> 01:15:10.400 align:middle line:84% We have not acted on that will, Mr. President. 01:15:10.400 --> 01:15:12.840 align:middle line:84% The tax rate is not what they have mandated. 01:15:12.840 --> 01:15:15.320 align:middle line:84% This amendment is an attempt to remind us of that. 01:15:15.320 --> 01:15:17.150 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:15:17.150 --> 01:15:24.950 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:15:24.950 --> 01:15:27.710 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] point of information. 01:15:27.710 --> 01:15:28.990 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:15:28.990 --> 01:15:32.330 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'd like to know the reduction in revenues 01:15:32.330 --> 01:15:36.260 align:middle line:84% this amendment would cost the Commonwealth if passed. 01:15:36.260 --> 01:15:42.870 align:middle line:84% The gentleman requests a point of information 01:15:42.870 --> 01:15:48.210 align:middle line:84% requesting that we know the number associated 01:15:48.210 --> 01:15:49.690 align:middle line:90% with this reduction. 01:15:49.690 --> 01:15:53.200 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:15:53.200 --> 01:15:54.450 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:15:54.450 --> 01:15:56.890 align:middle line:90% I appreciate the question. 01:15:56.890 --> 01:16:00.290 align:middle line:84% We are calculating the precise amount of that right now. 01:16:00.290 --> 01:16:03.140 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, we are going to particularly calculate 01:16:03.140 --> 01:16:06.490 align:middle line:84% that and reflect upon the spending increases that 01:16:06.490 --> 01:16:08.050 align:middle line:90% are contained in this budget. 01:16:08.050 --> 01:16:10.160 align:middle line:84% And surely, the amount of reduction 01:16:10.160 --> 01:16:13.180 align:middle line:84% in the income tax that would be occasioned by this amendment 01:16:13.180 --> 01:16:14.900 align:middle line:90% is less than that amount. 01:16:14.900 --> 01:16:17.060 align:middle line:84% But the member who asked this question 01:16:17.060 --> 01:16:18.610 align:middle line:90% deserves a precise answer. 01:16:18.610 --> 01:16:20.047 align:middle line:90% We will develop that answer. 01:16:20.047 --> 01:16:21.880 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, I move that the amendment 01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:23.990 align:middle line:90% be temporarily held. 01:16:23.990 --> 01:16:25.590 align:middle line:84% The gentleman asks that the amendment 01:16:25.590 --> 01:16:30.400 align:middle line:84% be held for providing time for research. 01:16:30.400 --> 01:16:34.660 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Middlesex and Worcester, 01:16:34.660 --> 01:16:35.620 align:middle line:90% Mr. Eldridge. 01:16:35.620 --> 01:16:37.370 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I request unanimous consent 01:16:37.370 --> 01:16:38.330 align:middle line:90% to make a brief statement. 01:16:38.330 --> 01:16:39.710 align:middle line:84% The gentlemen asks unanimous consent 01:16:39.710 --> 01:16:40.710 align:middle line:90% to make a brief statement. 01:16:40.710 --> 01:16:41.626 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:16:41.626 --> 01:16:43.079 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:16:43.079 --> 01:16:44.120 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:16:44.120 --> 01:16:47.140 align:middle line:84% I understand a minority leader has withdrawn his amendments. 01:16:47.140 --> 01:16:49.480 align:middle line:84% From a back of the envelope calculation 01:16:49.480 --> 01:16:55.650 align:middle line:84% I have made, each time we reduce our interest rate by 0.05%, 01:16:55.650 --> 01:16:58.590 align:middle line:84% it's about $100 million reduction in revenue. 01:16:58.590 --> 01:17:00.830 align:middle line:84% So if I'm not mistaken, and I do want 01:17:00.830 --> 01:17:03.200 align:middle line:84% to have my own staff do the analysis, 01:17:03.200 --> 01:17:06.490 align:middle line:84% this amendment, if passed, over two years 01:17:06.490 --> 01:17:09.470 align:middle line:84% would reduce revenue for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 01:17:09.470 --> 01:17:13.140 align:middle line:84% by over $200 million, at a time when we're already 01:17:13.140 --> 01:17:15.650 align:middle line:90% facing a structural deficit. 01:17:15.650 --> 01:17:16.240 align:middle line:90% Mr. President! 01:17:16.240 --> 01:17:19.770 align:middle line:84% Ah, the chair recognizes the senator from-- 01:17:19.770 --> 01:17:24.150 align:middle line:90% 01:17:24.150 --> 01:17:28.330 align:middle line:84% not having previously spoken, the chair recognizes-- 01:17:28.330 --> 01:17:30.600 align:middle line:84% Point of parliamentary procedure, Mr. President. 01:17:30.600 --> 01:17:31.100 align:middle line:90% One moment. 01:17:31.100 --> 01:17:32.340 align:middle line:90% I have to recognize you. 01:17:32.340 --> 01:17:33.554 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:17:33.554 --> 01:17:35.720 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester and Norfolk, Mr. Fattman. 01:17:35.720 --> 01:17:37.360 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentleman rise? 01:17:37.360 --> 01:17:38.710 align:middle line:90% Point of parliamentary inquiry. 01:17:38.710 --> 01:17:41.090 align:middle line:84% Gentleman will state his point of parliamentary inquiry. 01:17:41.090 --> 01:17:43.500 align:middle line:84% My question is, was the amendment withdrawn, or was it 01:17:43.500 --> 01:17:44.750 align:middle line:90% temporarily put on hold? 01:17:44.750 --> 01:17:48.280 align:middle line:84% The amendment was put on hold, not withdrawn. 01:17:48.280 --> 01:17:50.530 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:17:50.530 --> 01:17:52.904 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 01:17:52.904 --> 01:17:54.380 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, first of all, we 01:17:54.380 --> 01:17:55.920 align:middle line:90% did not withdraw the amendment. 01:17:55.920 --> 01:17:58.290 align:middle line:84% And that will enable us to have the opportunity 01:17:58.290 --> 01:18:01.400 align:middle line:84% to discuss this further so that we can further 01:18:01.400 --> 01:18:03.680 align:middle line:84% verify the information that's been presented 01:18:03.680 --> 01:18:05.760 align:middle line:90% by my good friend from-- 01:18:05.760 --> 01:18:07.900 align:middle line:84% I guess we would call it the Metro West Region. 01:18:07.900 --> 01:18:10.510 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, I would suggest this. 01:18:10.510 --> 01:18:14.400 align:middle line:84% If his information is correct, that it's a $200 million 01:18:14.400 --> 01:18:17.690 align:middle line:84% reduction, then we have to ask ourselves, 01:18:17.690 --> 01:18:20.860 align:middle line:84% as he pointed out, if we're in a time 01:18:20.860 --> 01:18:23.210 align:middle line:84% of tremendous fiscal constraint, then 01:18:23.210 --> 01:18:26.150 align:middle line:84% why the budget increases by 3.3%? 01:18:26.150 --> 01:18:28.750 align:middle line:84% That's a lot more than $200 million. 01:18:28.750 --> 01:18:32.290 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, that's without a decrease in taxation. 01:18:32.290 --> 01:18:35.120 align:middle line:84% It begs the very question about what we 01:18:35.120 --> 01:18:36.510 align:middle line:90% are doing here in this chamber. 01:18:36.510 --> 01:18:39.976 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I hope that we get an answer very shortly, 01:18:39.976 --> 01:18:41.350 align:middle line:84% and I move the amendment be held. 01:18:41.350 --> 01:18:44.070 align:middle line:84% And also the next amendment as well, Mr. President. 01:18:44.070 --> 01:18:46.730 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] amendment number 13 also be held, 01:18:46.730 --> 01:18:48.560 align:middle line:84% and now we're on amendment number 14, 01:18:48.560 --> 01:18:50.490 align:middle line:84% authored by the Senate from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:18:50.490 --> 01:18:52.114 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:18:52.114 --> 01:18:56.190 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 14 by Mr. Tarr, Post-Employment Benefits Review 01:18:56.190 --> 01:18:57.340 align:middle line:90% Commission. 01:18:57.340 --> 01:18:58.715 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:18:58.715 --> 01:19:01.089 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 01:19:01.089 --> 01:19:03.200 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we know that one of the things that 01:19:03.200 --> 01:19:06.690 align:middle line:84% has been a serious challenge, not only for state government, 01:19:06.690 --> 01:19:09.180 align:middle line:84% for cities and towns, is the requirement 01:19:09.180 --> 01:19:12.630 align:middle line:84% that was enacted a number of years ago for governments 01:19:12.630 --> 01:19:14.910 align:middle line:84% to carry on their balance sheet the cost 01:19:14.910 --> 01:19:16.910 align:middle line:84% of other post-employment benefits. 01:19:16.910 --> 01:19:20.840 align:middle line:84% Creating a liability, because those had not been necessarily 01:19:20.840 --> 01:19:22.080 align:middle line:90% funded in advance. 01:19:22.080 --> 01:19:24.470 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, this is an amendment 01:19:24.470 --> 01:19:26.510 align:middle line:84% to create a commission to look at ways to try 01:19:26.510 --> 01:19:29.827 align:middle line:84% to address that to be able to help municipalities, as well 01:19:29.827 --> 01:19:30.660 align:middle line:90% as state government. 01:19:30.660 --> 01:19:32.547 align:middle line:90% I hope the amendment is adopted. 01:19:32.547 --> 01:19:34.380 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:19:34.380 --> 01:19:35.680 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:19:35.680 --> 01:19:36.800 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:19:36.800 --> 01:19:37.572 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:19:37.572 --> 01:19:38.780 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:19:38.780 --> 01:19:41.202 align:middle line:84% Number 15, offered by the same senator, the title 01:19:41.202 --> 01:19:42.410 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:19:42.410 --> 01:19:47.230 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 15 by Mr. Tarr, 2017 Sales Tax Holiday. 01:19:47.230 --> 01:19:51.460 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:19:51.460 --> 01:19:52.070 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:19:52.070 --> 01:19:53.140 align:middle line:90% You've preempted me. 01:19:53.140 --> 01:19:55.600 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, you were always ahead of the curve, 01:19:55.600 --> 01:19:59.570 align:middle line:84% and it's proving itself here again today. 01:19:59.570 --> 01:20:00.840 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:20:00.840 --> 01:20:04.080 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, once again, this amendment 01:20:04.080 --> 01:20:07.950 align:middle line:84% would require there be a sales tax holiday in mid-August. 01:20:07.950 --> 01:20:12.400 align:middle line:84% We are spending 40-plus billion dollars. 01:20:12.400 --> 01:20:15.600 align:middle line:84% This amendment, I believe, would cost somewhere in the range-- 01:20:15.600 --> 01:20:18.760 align:middle line:84% if we consider it a cost, which is an interesting idea. 01:20:18.760 --> 01:20:22.370 align:middle line:84% Would require us to forego about $20 million 01:20:22.370 --> 01:20:25.810 align:middle line:84% in revenue to help the average person be able to do things, 01:20:25.810 --> 01:20:29.120 align:middle line:84% like buy school supplies for their kids 01:20:29.120 --> 01:20:31.060 align:middle line:84% before they return to school in the fall. 01:20:31.060 --> 01:20:32.394 align:middle line:90% I hope the amendment is adopted. 01:20:32.394 --> 01:20:34.393 align:middle line:84% Question comes on the adoption of the amendment. 01:20:34.393 --> 01:20:35.680 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:20:35.680 --> 01:20:36.840 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:20:36.840 --> 01:20:37.770 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:20:37.770 --> 01:20:39.200 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:20:39.200 --> 01:20:41.369 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 16 is offered by the senator 01:20:41.369 --> 01:20:43.160 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:20:43.160 --> 01:20:44.785 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:20:44.785 --> 01:20:48.030 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 16 by Mr. Eldridge, Earned Income Tax 01:20:48.030 --> 01:20:48.940 align:middle line:90% Credit. 01:20:48.940 --> 01:20:51.660 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Middlesex and Worcester, 01:20:51.660 --> 01:20:52.240 align:middle line:90% Mr. Eldridge. 01:20:52.240 --> 01:21:00.350 align:middle line:84% Mr. President [AUDIO OUT] the Earned Income Tax Credit, 01:21:00.350 --> 01:21:02.830 align:middle line:84% one of the most powerful anti-poverty tools 01:21:02.830 --> 01:21:05.830 align:middle line:84% we have in our hands in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 01:21:05.830 --> 01:21:09.670 align:middle line:84% and across the country, to 30% of the federal EITC. 01:21:09.670 --> 01:21:13.350 align:middle line:84% The amendment also requires the Department of Revenue 01:21:13.350 --> 01:21:15.300 align:middle line:84% to administer an outreach program 01:21:15.300 --> 01:21:18.880 align:middle line:84% to make sure that EITC-eligible taxpayers are 01:21:18.880 --> 01:21:20.580 align:middle line:90% aware of the tax credit. 01:21:20.580 --> 01:21:22.600 align:middle line:84% There are literally hundreds of thousands 01:21:22.600 --> 01:21:25.060 align:middle line:84% of residents, Mr. President, that 01:21:25.060 --> 01:21:28.130 align:middle line:84% do not know that they are eligible for the Earned Income 01:21:28.130 --> 01:21:28.880 align:middle line:90% Tax Credit. 01:21:28.880 --> 01:21:31.630 align:middle line:84% And I want to emphasize this is for people who are working. 01:21:31.630 --> 01:21:33.420 align:middle line:90% This is for working families. 01:21:33.420 --> 01:21:35.070 align:middle line:90% I want to thank Chairwoman [? 01:21:35.070 --> 01:21:38.730 align:middle line:84% Skilker ?] for including in the budget a crucial reform 01:21:38.730 --> 01:21:42.730 align:middle line:84% to the EITC, assisting victims of domestic violence 01:21:42.730 --> 01:21:45.320 align:middle line:84% by allowing married filers who are living apart from 01:21:45.320 --> 01:21:48.400 align:middle line:84% their spouse due to domestic abuse to claim the credit. 01:21:48.400 --> 01:21:50.100 align:middle line:84% I want to thank her for her compassion 01:21:50.100 --> 01:21:52.700 align:middle line:84% for putting that into the Senate Ways and Means Budget. 01:21:52.700 --> 01:21:55.230 align:middle line:84% And of course, two years ago, Mr. President, 01:21:55.230 --> 01:21:58.140 align:middle line:84% we expanded the Earned Income Tax Credit 01:21:58.140 --> 01:22:03.340 align:middle line:84% from 15% of the federal EITC to 23%, where it is now. 01:22:03.340 --> 01:22:05.210 align:middle line:84% So what this amendment is looking to do 01:22:05.210 --> 01:22:07.700 align:middle line:90% is increasing it by another 7%. 01:22:07.700 --> 01:22:11.380 align:middle line:84% It would cost approximately $70 million. 01:22:11.380 --> 01:22:15.520 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we live in a state that has the 45th highest 01:22:15.520 --> 01:22:18.760 align:middle line:84% level of inequality, according to the U.S. News & World 01:22:18.760 --> 01:22:19.510 align:middle line:90% Report. 01:22:19.510 --> 01:22:22.180 align:middle line:84% This is unacceptable in a commonwealth 01:22:22.180 --> 01:22:25.650 align:middle line:84% where the economy is booming in many parts of the state, 01:22:25.650 --> 01:22:28.100 align:middle line:84% and yet, there are many other parts of the Commonwealth 01:22:28.100 --> 01:22:30.060 align:middle line:90% where families are struggling. 01:22:30.060 --> 01:22:31.520 align:middle line:84% Obviously, here in Massachusetts, 01:22:31.520 --> 01:22:33.410 align:middle line:90% we have high housing costs. 01:22:33.410 --> 01:22:35.530 align:middle line:90% We have high energy costs. 01:22:35.530 --> 01:22:37.570 align:middle line:90% High property taxes. 01:22:37.570 --> 01:22:40.310 align:middle line:84% And this is a measure to provide some tax 01:22:40.310 --> 01:22:43.920 align:middle line:84% relief to hardworking families across Massachusetts. 01:22:43.920 --> 01:22:47.820 align:middle line:84% The benefit of the EITC is also that this money, 01:22:47.820 --> 01:22:50.470 align:middle line:84% unlike some of the corporate welfare we give out 01:22:50.470 --> 01:22:53.290 align:middle line:84% across the Commonwealth, is money that more often than not 01:22:53.290 --> 01:22:54.700 align:middle line:90% is spent locally. 01:22:54.700 --> 01:22:58.410 align:middle line:84% So if a family receives a check, a tax refund 01:22:58.410 --> 01:23:01.670 align:middle line:84% through filing with EITC in the tax filing season, 01:23:01.670 --> 01:23:05.950 align:middle line:84% they're going to use that money to pay for local costs. 01:23:05.950 --> 01:23:09.300 align:middle line:84% Whether it's health care costs, rent, or local needs 01:23:09.300 --> 01:23:11.620 align:middle line:84% they have to provide for their families. 01:23:11.620 --> 01:23:13.710 align:middle line:84% Specifically, this amendment would 01:23:13.710 --> 01:23:18.610 align:middle line:84% provide for a family of four an average of a $400 credit. 01:23:18.610 --> 01:23:20.700 align:middle line:84% That's a credit that will make a difference, 01:23:20.700 --> 01:23:23.220 align:middle line:84% even if it's a small amount, in the difference for families 01:23:23.220 --> 01:23:24.860 align:middle line:90% across Massachusetts. 01:23:24.860 --> 01:23:27.930 align:middle line:84% Now, I mentioned the bill also includes language 01:23:27.930 --> 01:23:29.880 align:middle line:84% that asks the Department of Revenue 01:23:29.880 --> 01:23:34.560 align:middle line:84% to engage in an aggressive and comprehensive EITC promotion. 01:23:34.560 --> 01:23:37.030 align:middle line:84% This would make sure that families that may not 01:23:37.030 --> 01:23:40.350 align:middle line:84% know that they're eligible for the EITC know about it, 01:23:40.350 --> 01:23:42.980 align:middle line:90% and apply to get that full EITC. 01:23:42.980 --> 01:23:46.510 align:middle line:84% I am very proud of the efforts the Senate has advanced 01:23:46.510 --> 01:23:48.920 align:middle line:84% over the past several years to assist 01:23:48.920 --> 01:23:50.510 align:middle line:90% those who are less well-off. 01:23:50.510 --> 01:23:52.570 align:middle line:84% Many of those provisions are already 01:23:52.570 --> 01:23:55.130 align:middle line:84% in the Senate Ways and Means Budget we're debating. 01:23:55.130 --> 01:23:57.510 align:middle line:84% But the reality is that we're not 01:23:57.510 --> 01:24:00.450 align:middle line:84% doing enough to help the working poor in Massachusetts. 01:24:00.450 --> 01:24:02.810 align:middle line:84% These are families in each of our communities, 01:24:02.810 --> 01:24:06.130 align:middle line:84% and yet we're not doing much in this budget, or outside 01:24:06.130 --> 01:24:10.670 align:middle line:84% of the budget, to assist working poor families. 01:24:10.670 --> 01:24:12.710 align:middle line:84% So I urge my colleagues to support 01:24:12.710 --> 01:24:14.520 align:middle line:90% this expansion of the EITC. 01:24:14.520 --> 01:24:17.190 align:middle line:84% It has generally been a bipartisan effort, 01:24:17.190 --> 01:24:19.440 align:middle line:84% and so I urge my colleagues to support 01:24:19.440 --> 01:24:22.330 align:middle line:84% this important expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit. 01:24:22.330 --> 01:24:24.367 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:24:24.367 --> 01:24:26.200 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:24:26.200 --> 01:24:32.462 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester and Norfolk, Mr. Fattman. 01:24:32.462 --> 01:24:33.170 align:middle line:90% Point of inquiry. 01:24:33.170 --> 01:24:34.660 align:middle line:90% Mr. President. 01:24:34.660 --> 01:24:38.780 align:middle line:84% To the gentleman from Middlesex, Worcester, and-- 01:24:38.780 --> 01:24:40.260 align:middle line:90% That's it. 01:24:40.260 --> 01:24:41.520 align:middle line:90% OK, Middlesex and Worcester. 01:24:41.520 --> 01:24:43.970 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:24:43.970 --> 01:24:45.890 align:middle line:84% You had mentioned the cost of-- let 01:24:45.890 --> 01:24:49.330 align:middle line:84% me begin by thanking the gentleman for his big heart. 01:24:49.330 --> 01:24:51.490 align:middle line:84% I think that the program is worthwhile. 01:24:51.490 --> 01:24:56.090 align:middle line:84% He mentioned $70 million that it would cost for this expansion. 01:24:56.090 --> 01:24:58.070 align:middle line:90% Is that correct? 01:24:58.070 --> 01:24:59.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:59.070 --> 01:25:01.650 align:middle line:84% What about the role of the Department of Revenue? 01:25:01.650 --> 01:25:03.960 align:middle line:84% How much will it cost them to promote the program, 01:25:03.960 --> 01:25:07.290 align:middle line:84% and what additional cost might that add to the program? 01:25:07.290 --> 01:25:08.520 align:middle line:90% Has it ever been done? 01:25:08.520 --> 01:25:10.741 align:middle line:84% Just would like to have an answer to that question, 01:25:10.741 --> 01:25:11.240 align:middle line:90% please. 01:25:11.240 --> 01:25:16.560 align:middle line:90% 01:25:16.560 --> 01:25:21.600 align:middle line:84% [AUDIO OUT] from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:25:21.600 --> 01:25:22.100 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:25:22.100 --> 01:25:24.510 align:middle line:84% I thank the gentleman from Sutton for his question. 01:25:24.510 --> 01:25:27.430 align:middle line:84% I do not know the exact cost for the DOR 01:25:27.430 --> 01:25:31.890 align:middle line:84% to run an aggressive outreach campaign for the EITC expansion 01:25:31.890 --> 01:25:32.840 align:middle line:90% that I filed. 01:25:32.840 --> 01:25:37.750 align:middle line:84% However, I think it's fair to accept or suggest 01:25:37.750 --> 01:25:40.220 align:middle line:84% that it would be a very modest cost, 01:25:40.220 --> 01:25:43.470 align:middle line:84% because we're talking about an effort these days 01:25:43.470 --> 01:25:46.000 align:middle line:84% through online, through social media, 01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:49.970 align:middle line:84% through, perhaps, a modest advertising campaign. 01:25:49.970 --> 01:25:52.520 align:middle line:84% To state agencies where, more often than not, 01:25:52.520 --> 01:25:54.960 align:middle line:84% working poor families are already interacting. 01:25:54.960 --> 01:25:56.970 align:middle line:84% So that they know about the EITC. 01:25:56.970 --> 01:26:00.450 align:middle line:84% We also have a robust number of non-profits 01:26:00.450 --> 01:26:02.980 align:middle line:84% throughout Massachusetts that help residents 01:26:02.980 --> 01:26:04.450 align:middle line:90% apply for the EITC. 01:26:04.450 --> 01:26:07.040 align:middle line:84% So those, of course, have some state funding. 01:26:07.040 --> 01:26:09.520 align:middle line:84% But often, they raise money on their own. 01:26:09.520 --> 01:26:12.480 align:middle line:84% And so my opinion is it would be a rather small amount of money 01:26:12.480 --> 01:26:14.740 align:middle line:84% that would literally help hundreds of thousands 01:26:14.740 --> 01:26:16.530 align:middle line:84% of families across Massachusetts. 01:26:16.530 --> 01:26:19.590 align:middle line:84% And again, the average increase for a family of four 01:26:19.590 --> 01:26:22.770 align:middle line:84% to expand the EITC would be about $400 01:26:22.770 --> 01:26:24.490 align:middle line:84% above what they currently receive. 01:26:24.490 --> 01:26:26.800 align:middle line:84% So I think for whatever investment 01:26:26.800 --> 01:26:30.010 align:middle line:84% it'd take for the Department of Revenue to administer, 01:26:30.010 --> 01:26:33.220 align:middle line:84% perhaps, this expanded program, it is minor 01:26:33.220 --> 01:26:35.530 align:middle line:84% compared to the benefit to hundreds of thousands 01:26:35.530 --> 01:26:38.710 align:middle line:84% of families across Massachusetts. 01:26:38.710 --> 01:26:39.210 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:26:39.210 --> 01:26:46.140 align:middle line:84% [AUDIO OUT] Senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, 01:26:46.140 --> 01:26:47.139 align:middle line:90% Mr. DeMacedo. 01:26:47.139 --> 01:26:48.180 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:26:48.180 --> 01:26:50.480 align:middle line:84% And again to the gentleman from Acton, 01:26:50.480 --> 01:26:54.040 align:middle line:84% in light of your previous question to the gentleman 01:26:54.040 --> 01:26:58.680 align:middle line:84% in regards to his addressing another previous amendment, 01:26:58.680 --> 01:27:00.230 align:middle line:90% you asked a question of cost. 01:27:00.230 --> 01:27:03.420 align:middle line:84% And so you've addressed the $70 million cost. 01:27:03.420 --> 01:27:05.310 align:middle line:84% I guess the question is, in light 01:27:05.310 --> 01:27:07.810 align:middle line:84% of the financial situation I think that we all 01:27:07.810 --> 01:27:10.090 align:middle line:84% face, that we all know that we're in right now, 01:27:10.090 --> 01:27:13.620 align:middle line:84% and we understand that a 3.3% increase in a budget 01:27:13.620 --> 01:27:16.410 align:middle line:90% is a tall order. 01:27:16.410 --> 01:27:19.350 align:middle line:84% We're trying to figure that out at this particular juncture. 01:27:19.350 --> 01:27:22.590 align:middle line:84% And I stood with you and supported last time 01:27:22.590 --> 01:27:24.300 align:middle line:90% when we went from 15 to 23%. 01:27:24.300 --> 01:27:27.310 align:middle line:84% We understand that, so I don't want 01:27:27.310 --> 01:27:32.330 align:middle line:84% to make a point of that it's wrong to try. 01:27:32.330 --> 01:27:35.030 align:middle line:84% But the reality is, I guess I'm asking the question, how would 01:27:35.030 --> 01:27:37.775 align:middle line:90% you justify the expenditure? 01:27:37.775 --> 01:27:39.150 align:middle line:84% In the sense of, how are we going 01:27:39.150 --> 01:27:41.340 align:middle line:90% to pay for that $70 million? 01:27:41.340 --> 01:27:43.820 align:middle line:84% Because from what we can tell at this particular juncture, 01:27:43.820 --> 01:27:47.070 align:middle line:84% we don't necessarily have an extra $70 million dollars 01:27:47.070 --> 01:27:49.750 align:middle line:90% at this point to expend. 01:27:49.750 --> 01:27:52.060 align:middle line:84% And so I'm certain that you have the answer to that, 01:27:52.060 --> 01:27:54.100 align:middle line:84% and that's what I'm trying to understand. 01:27:54.100 --> 01:27:56.200 align:middle line:84% Because I understand the concept. 01:27:56.200 --> 01:28:00.070 align:middle line:84% We, as you said, bipartisan supported it in the past. 01:28:00.070 --> 01:28:02.610 align:middle line:84% However, this is a different budget cycle 01:28:02.610 --> 01:28:04.270 align:middle line:84% that we're in right now, and it seems 01:28:04.270 --> 01:28:06.810 align:middle line:84% to be a very tight fiscal budget cycle. 01:28:06.810 --> 01:28:09.630 align:middle line:84% So to that extent, I would love to hear the gentleman 01:28:09.630 --> 01:28:11.407 align:middle line:84% from Acton's response on how we're going 01:28:11.407 --> 01:28:12.490 align:middle line:90% to afford the $70 million. 01:28:12.490 --> 01:28:15.500 align:middle line:90% 01:28:15.500 --> 01:28:18.419 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:28:18.419 --> 01:28:19.460 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:28:19.460 --> 01:28:21.620 align:middle line:84% I appreciate the question from the Plymouth, 01:28:21.620 --> 01:28:25.700 align:middle line:84% and I do pride myself in filing many amendments to increase 01:28:25.700 --> 01:28:27.160 align:middle line:90% the bottom line to the budget. 01:28:27.160 --> 01:28:30.100 align:middle line:84% By more often than not, also filing proposals 01:28:30.100 --> 01:28:31.180 align:middle line:90% to raise revenue. 01:28:31.180 --> 01:28:34.930 align:middle line:84% And in this budget, I have actually filed amendment 23. 01:28:34.930 --> 01:28:37.060 align:middle line:84% That would close the single sales 01:28:37.060 --> 01:28:39.770 align:middle line:84% factor corporate tax loophole for the mutual fund 01:28:39.770 --> 01:28:42.940 align:middle line:84% industry for companies like Fidelity Investments. 01:28:42.940 --> 01:28:48.440 align:middle line:84% The estimate is that this would raise about $143 million 01:28:48.440 --> 01:28:51.190 align:middle line:84% for FY18, and it has cost the Commonwealth, 01:28:51.190 --> 01:28:56.030 align:middle line:84% according to the Department of Revenue, $155 million in FY17. 01:28:56.030 --> 01:29:00.680 align:middle line:84% So since we're halfway through the fiscal year, this amendment 01:29:00.680 --> 01:29:03.280 align:middle line:84% that I have filed, and will hopefully later debate, 01:29:03.280 --> 01:29:08.300 align:middle line:84% conveniently matches with the expansion of the EITC by 7%, 01:29:08.300 --> 01:29:09.870 align:middle line:90% by a round of $70 million. 01:29:09.870 --> 01:29:12.070 align:middle line:84% And I think this is an important point 01:29:12.070 --> 01:29:15.130 align:middle line:84% that, perhaps, Republicans and Democrats will have today 01:29:15.130 --> 01:29:17.420 align:middle line:84% and throughout the debate, is where 01:29:17.420 --> 01:29:20.890 align:middle line:84% do we want to see the cutting or raising of taxes. 01:29:20.890 --> 01:29:23.520 align:middle line:90% What is truly a fair tax system? 01:29:23.520 --> 01:29:26.790 align:middle line:84% And are we truly investing in our communities properly? 01:29:26.790 --> 01:29:30.150 align:middle line:84% I would submit that a 20-year-old tax cut 01:29:30.150 --> 01:29:34.490 align:middle line:84% for some of the wealthiest corporations in this country, 01:29:34.490 --> 01:29:37.110 align:middle line:84% serving often the wealthiest families 01:29:37.110 --> 01:29:39.980 align:middle line:84% in this country and the world, is not the best 01:29:39.980 --> 01:29:41.650 align:middle line:90% use of our taxpayer dollars. 01:29:41.650 --> 01:29:43.340 align:middle line:84% And I'd rather see that money spent 01:29:43.340 --> 01:29:46.280 align:middle line:84% to expand the EITC for hardworking families 01:29:46.280 --> 01:29:49.660 align:middle line:84% across Massachusetts who will use that tax credit to spend 01:29:49.660 --> 01:29:52.930 align:middle line:84% money in their own communities, benefiting the general economy. 01:29:52.930 --> 01:29:55.930 align:middle line:84% Compared to a tax break for a very large corporation. 01:29:55.930 --> 01:29:58.770 align:middle line:90% 01:29:58.770 --> 01:30:01.580 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:30:01.580 --> 01:30:04.280 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex, Ms. Jehlen, 01:30:04.280 --> 01:30:05.710 align:middle line:90% not having previously spoken. 01:30:05.710 --> 01:30:07.480 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:30:07.480 --> 01:30:10.280 align:middle line:84% I'm so grateful to the gentleman from Plymouth 01:30:10.280 --> 01:30:13.390 align:middle line:84% for being fiscally responsible, and asking that when 01:30:13.390 --> 01:30:19.380 align:middle line:84% we propose a tax cut, that we propose offsetting 01:30:19.380 --> 01:30:20.850 align:middle line:90% cuts in expenditures. 01:30:20.850 --> 01:30:23.000 align:middle line:84% And I am expecting to hear that when 01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:25.690 align:middle line:84% there are proposals from the Minority 01:30:25.690 --> 01:30:28.930 align:middle line:90% section about other tax cuts. 01:30:28.930 --> 01:30:32.430 align:middle line:84% But I also want to appreciate the gentleman from Acton 01:30:32.430 --> 01:30:39.980 align:middle line:84% for proposing offsetting tax cuts and tax restorations. 01:30:39.980 --> 01:30:43.300 align:middle line:84% The reason this one is important is 01:30:43.300 --> 01:30:45.030 align:middle line:84% because many of our constituents are 01:30:45.030 --> 01:30:48.860 align:middle line:84% worried about the effect of decisions in Washington 01:30:48.860 --> 01:30:51.380 align:middle line:84% on the people of the Commonwealth. 01:30:51.380 --> 01:30:57.060 align:middle line:84% And the president has proposed cutting the Earned Income Tax 01:30:57.060 --> 01:31:00.040 align:middle line:84% Credit, which would hurt the poorest working 01:31:00.040 --> 01:31:03.370 align:middle line:84% people in Massachusetts, and across the country. 01:31:03.370 --> 01:31:06.270 align:middle line:84% And he has proposed lowering taxes 01:31:06.270 --> 01:31:08.800 align:middle line:84% for corporations and the wealthiest people 01:31:08.800 --> 01:31:10.740 align:middle line:90% in the country. 01:31:10.740 --> 01:31:14.510 align:middle line:84% So these two proposals taken together 01:31:14.510 --> 01:31:19.260 align:middle line:84% offset some of the damage that may come to us from decisions 01:31:19.260 --> 01:31:20.230 align:middle line:90% in Washington. 01:31:20.230 --> 01:31:25.080 align:middle line:84% So I support strongly the work of the gentleman from Acton, 01:31:25.080 --> 01:31:28.150 align:middle line:84% and hope that we will favorably consider 01:31:28.150 --> 01:31:31.260 align:middle line:90% both of his suggestions. 01:31:31.260 --> 01:31:34.170 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, Mr. De-- 01:31:34.170 --> 01:31:37.150 align:middle line:90% I'm sorry, from Norfolk. 01:31:37.150 --> 01:31:37.970 align:middle line:90% Mr. Fattman. 01:31:37.970 --> 01:31:39.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:31:39.110 --> 01:31:41.170 align:middle line:84% The gentleman from Middlesex and Worcester 01:31:41.170 --> 01:31:43.640 align:middle line:84% had pointed out that the Earned Income Tax 01:31:43.640 --> 01:31:46.310 align:middle line:84% Credit will help hundreds of thousands of families, 01:31:46.310 --> 01:31:47.780 align:middle line:90% and I agree with that. 01:31:47.780 --> 01:31:50.300 align:middle line:84% But what I would also suggest is that when 01:31:50.300 --> 01:31:53.600 align:middle line:84% people voted to reduce the income tax down to 5%, 01:31:53.600 --> 01:31:55.820 align:middle line:84% that also would help hundreds of thousands 01:31:55.820 --> 01:31:57.890 align:middle line:84% of working families across our commonwealth. 01:31:57.890 --> 01:32:00.350 align:middle line:84% Providing more disposable income for them 01:32:00.350 --> 01:32:03.960 align:middle line:84% and their families to decide how they would spend that money. 01:32:03.960 --> 01:32:06.080 align:middle line:84% And it was not just merely a suggestion when 01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:07.580 align:middle line:90% they voted on it in the ballot. 01:32:07.580 --> 01:32:09.610 align:middle line:90% It was a mandate. 01:32:09.610 --> 01:32:12.060 align:middle line:84% And it was 60% of this Commonwealth plus 01:32:12.060 --> 01:32:14.610 align:middle line:84% that voted for it, and we have waited 18 years. 01:32:14.610 --> 01:32:17.290 align:middle line:84% And so I think when we talk about issues of fairness 01:32:17.290 --> 01:32:20.890 align:middle line:84% in our tax code, let's go back to 2000, when people voted. 01:32:20.890 --> 01:32:23.097 align:middle line:84% Their will should not just be heard by this body, 01:32:23.097 --> 01:32:23.930 align:middle line:90% it should be heeded. 01:32:23.930 --> 01:32:26.870 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:32:26.870 --> 01:32:28.930 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:32:28.930 --> 01:32:30.480 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:32:30.480 --> 01:32:31.680 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:32:31.680 --> 01:32:32.522 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:32:32.522 --> 01:32:33.730 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:32:33.730 --> 01:32:36.124 align:middle line:84% Number 17, offered by the senator 01:32:36.124 --> 01:32:37.790 align:middle line:84% from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor. 01:32:37.790 --> 01:32:39.590 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:32:39.590 --> 01:32:41.760 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 17 by Mr. O'Connor, 01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:44.580 align:middle line:84% Southfield Redevelopment Authority Bond Technical 01:32:44.580 --> 01:32:45.930 align:middle line:90% Correction. 01:32:45.930 --> 01:32:48.110 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor. 01:32:48.110 --> 01:32:50.610 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, thank you, and through you to the membership. 01:32:50.610 --> 01:32:54.830 align:middle line:84% And I want to thank my partner in the project at Union Point, 01:32:54.830 --> 01:32:56.680 align:middle line:90% John Keenan, Senator Keenan. 01:32:56.680 --> 01:32:59.350 align:middle line:84% This amendment is very straightforward. 01:32:59.350 --> 01:33:06.150 align:middle line:84% It essentially allows for a series of 2010A bonds 01:33:06.150 --> 01:33:07.533 align:middle line:90% to be reissued. 01:33:07.533 --> 01:33:11.630 align:middle line:90% 01:33:11.630 --> 01:33:14.600 align:middle line:84% The structure of the Southfield Redevelopment Authority 01:33:14.600 --> 01:33:17.950 align:middle line:84% as such, where the towns of Weymouth, Rockland, 01:33:17.950 --> 01:33:20.900 align:middle line:84% and Abington had full control when it was a former South 01:33:20.900 --> 01:33:23.000 align:middle line:84% Shore tri-town development corporation-- 01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:24.390 align:middle line:90% excuse me. 01:33:24.390 --> 01:33:28.120 align:middle line:84% Enabling legislation changed that in 2014, 01:33:28.120 --> 01:33:32.180 align:middle line:84% and left the bond with $600,000 still remaining in it. 01:33:32.180 --> 01:33:34.990 align:middle line:84% This bill would allow for this bond 01:33:34.990 --> 01:33:40.910 align:middle line:84% to be spent for public purposes at this development. 01:33:40.910 --> 01:33:43.180 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:33:43.180 --> 01:33:49.809 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk and Plymouth, Mr. Keenan. 01:33:49.809 --> 01:33:50.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:33:50.850 --> 01:33:52.600 align:middle line:84% I want to thank my colleague from Weymouth 01:33:52.600 --> 01:33:53.980 align:middle line:90% for his lead on this. 01:33:53.980 --> 01:33:56.972 align:middle line:84% The Union Point Development is obviously a big development. 01:33:56.972 --> 01:33:58.930 align:middle line:84% Many of the senators here are familiar with it, 01:33:58.930 --> 01:34:00.920 align:middle line:90% having visited the location. 01:34:00.920 --> 01:34:03.590 align:middle line:84% They've made great progress over the last several years 01:34:03.590 --> 01:34:07.330 align:middle line:84% in developing that old Naval site there, 01:34:07.330 --> 01:34:09.400 align:middle line:84% and there's great hope for what may come. 01:34:09.400 --> 01:34:11.380 align:middle line:84% One of the things that they need is the ability 01:34:11.380 --> 01:34:14.220 align:middle line:84% to continue on with their financing programs. 01:34:14.220 --> 01:34:16.790 align:middle line:84% And this enabling legislation that 01:34:16.790 --> 01:34:19.360 align:middle line:84% was passed a couple years ago allowed 01:34:19.360 --> 01:34:22.040 align:middle line:84% for them to put out bonds, but said 01:34:22.040 --> 01:34:25.010 align:middle line:84% that they could not necessarily, after a certain date, 01:34:25.010 --> 01:34:28.500 align:middle line:84% use ad valorem property taxes to fund those bonds. 01:34:28.500 --> 01:34:30.090 align:middle line:84% What this does is say that in cases 01:34:30.090 --> 01:34:31.990 align:middle line:84% of re-issuing or refunding bonds, 01:34:31.990 --> 01:34:33.710 align:middle line:84% that language doesn't necessarily apply. 01:34:33.710 --> 01:34:36.730 align:middle line:84% So it is critical that the base, or that 01:34:36.730 --> 01:34:39.550 align:middle line:84% the developer of the base, have this flexibility to continue on 01:34:39.550 --> 01:34:41.000 align:middle line:90% with their development program. 01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:43.730 align:middle line:84% So again, I want to thank my colleague for his great work 01:34:43.730 --> 01:34:44.800 align:middle line:90% in moving this forward. 01:34:44.800 --> 01:34:46.680 align:middle line:84% And I think it bodes well for the development 01:34:46.680 --> 01:34:49.180 align:middle line:84% of that particular site and its impact 01:34:49.180 --> 01:34:50.432 align:middle line:90% upon the regional economy. 01:34:50.432 --> 01:34:51.640 align:middle line:90% I urge your favorable action. 01:34:51.640 --> 01:34:52.450 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:34:52.450 --> 01:34:53.910 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:34:53.910 --> 01:34:55.200 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:34:55.200 --> 01:34:56.200 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:34:56.200 --> 01:34:57.050 align:middle line:90% The Ayes have it. 01:34:57.050 --> 01:34:58.430 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:34:58.430 --> 01:35:01.256 align:middle line:84% Number 18, offered by the senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:35:01.256 --> 01:35:02.880 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:35:02.880 --> 01:35:05.700 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 18 by Mr. Tarr, Super Research 01:35:05.700 --> 01:35:07.157 align:middle line:90% and Development Tax Credit. 01:35:07.157 --> 01:35:08.990 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:35:08.990 --> 01:35:10.280 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:35:10.280 --> 01:35:11.340 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:35:11.340 --> 01:35:12.300 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:35:12.300 --> 01:35:13.780 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:35:13.780 --> 01:35:16.050 align:middle line:84% Number 19, offered by the senator from Plymouth 01:35:16.050 --> 01:35:18.142 align:middle line:84% and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor, the title 01:35:18.142 --> 01:35:19.350 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 01:35:19.350 --> 01:35:21.570 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 19 by Mr. O'Connor, Home 01:35:21.570 --> 01:35:24.837 align:middle line:84% of Senator Daniel Webster and Governor Winslow. 01:35:24.837 --> 01:35:26.670 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:35:26.670 --> 01:35:27.950 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:35:27.950 --> 01:35:28.970 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:35:28.970 --> 01:35:29.880 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:35:29.880 --> 01:35:31.260 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:35:31.260 --> 01:35:32.940 align:middle line:84% Number 20, offered by the senator 01:35:32.940 --> 01:35:34.985 align:middle line:84% from Norfolk and Plymouth, Mr. Keenan. 01:35:34.985 --> 01:35:36.610 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:35:36.610 --> 01:35:39.480 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 20 by Mr. Keenan, Commuter Transit 01:35:39.480 --> 01:35:40.310 align:middle line:90% Benefits. 01:35:40.310 --> 01:35:43.540 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk and Plymouth, Mr. Keenan. 01:35:43.540 --> 01:35:45.090 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:35:45.090 --> 01:35:46.900 align:middle line:84% I'll make this as brief as possible. 01:35:46.900 --> 01:35:49.330 align:middle line:84% What happened back in 2005 was that there 01:35:49.330 --> 01:35:50.880 align:middle line:84% was a change in the federal code that 01:35:50.880 --> 01:35:53.380 align:middle line:84% had to do with Commuter Tax Benefits. 01:35:53.380 --> 01:35:55.220 align:middle line:84% And it established commuter tax benefits 01:35:55.220 --> 01:35:59.460 align:middle line:84% for those who drive and park at their places of employment, 01:35:59.460 --> 01:36:01.050 align:middle line:84% those who take public transportation, 01:36:01.050 --> 01:36:03.091 align:middle line:84% and also there was a provision in there for those 01:36:03.091 --> 01:36:04.400 align:middle line:90% that may go by bicycle. 01:36:04.400 --> 01:36:06.020 align:middle line:84% Our tax code here in Massachusetts 01:36:06.020 --> 01:36:09.650 align:middle line:84% does not match that of the federal government. 01:36:09.650 --> 01:36:13.592 align:middle line:84% So what we have is a difference in the pretax commuter 01:36:13.592 --> 01:36:16.050 align:middle line:84% benefit that's available to the residents of Massachusetts. 01:36:16.050 --> 01:36:18.600 align:middle line:84% For instance, in the area of public transportation 01:36:18.600 --> 01:36:21.300 align:middle line:84% in particular, those that go to work by public transit, 01:36:21.300 --> 01:36:24.210 align:middle line:84% the Federal Credit is $255, which 01:36:24.210 --> 01:36:26.410 align:middle line:90% matches the Parking Credit. 01:36:26.410 --> 01:36:29.180 align:middle line:84% But here in Massachusetts, our Public Transit Credit 01:36:29.180 --> 01:36:30.750 align:middle line:90% is only $130. 01:36:30.750 --> 01:36:32.820 align:middle line:84% So rather than incentivize people 01:36:32.820 --> 01:36:36.760 align:middle line:84% to use public transportation, we're giving them an incentive 01:36:36.760 --> 01:36:38.900 align:middle line:84% to drive to work and to park, because the commuter 01:36:38.900 --> 01:36:42.130 align:middle line:84% tax benefit for that particular mode of transportation 01:36:42.130 --> 01:36:44.760 align:middle line:84% and the parking associated with it is greater. 01:36:44.760 --> 01:36:48.196 align:middle line:84% What this amendment does would equalize our tax code 01:36:48.196 --> 01:36:49.820 align:middle line:84% with the federal government's tax code. 01:36:49.820 --> 01:36:53.272 align:middle line:84% So it would raise our Parking Credit 01:36:53.272 --> 01:36:54.980 align:middle line:84% to match the federal government's Parking 01:36:54.980 --> 01:36:57.150 align:middle line:90% Credit of $255. 01:36:57.150 --> 01:37:01.050 align:middle line:84% Additionally, this amendment would add a credit of $20 01:37:01.050 --> 01:37:03.450 align:middle line:84% for those who are commuting to work by bike. 01:37:03.450 --> 01:37:06.060 align:middle line:84% The purpose behind that is to incentivize 01:37:06.060 --> 01:37:09.180 align:middle line:84% people to use that mode of transportation to access work. 01:37:09.180 --> 01:37:13.230 align:middle line:84% This amendment would also tie future increases 01:37:13.230 --> 01:37:15.410 align:middle line:84% to that, which happens at the federal level. 01:37:15.410 --> 01:37:17.940 align:middle line:84% So that we do not have to keep coming back and trying 01:37:17.940 --> 01:37:18.830 align:middle line:90% to play catch up. 01:37:18.830 --> 01:37:21.330 align:middle line:84% If the federal commuter tax benefit increases, 01:37:21.330 --> 01:37:23.970 align:middle line:84% our state commuter tax benefit would increase. 01:37:23.970 --> 01:37:26.740 align:middle line:84% This is a benefit, obviously, to commuters of all types. 01:37:26.740 --> 01:37:28.320 align:middle line:84% And it's also a benefit to employees, 01:37:28.320 --> 01:37:30.360 align:middle line:84% because it is a program that they 01:37:30.360 --> 01:37:33.770 align:middle line:84% can offer an incentive they can offer to their employees. 01:37:33.770 --> 01:37:37.880 align:middle line:84% And in the instances where it affects parking 01:37:37.880 --> 01:37:40.910 align:middle line:84% and public transportation, because those would now 01:37:40.910 --> 01:37:43.830 align:middle line:84% match the Federal Credit, it would be much easier 01:37:43.830 --> 01:37:46.440 align:middle line:84% administratively for the employer 01:37:46.440 --> 01:37:49.230 align:middle line:84% to provide those credits, and make sure that they make sure-- 01:37:49.230 --> 01:37:51.600 align:middle line:84% provide for the proper accounting of those benefits. 01:37:51.600 --> 01:37:55.200 align:middle line:84% So I think this is a pro-commuter tax credit. 01:37:55.200 --> 01:37:57.682 align:middle line:84% It is one that certainly is pro-commuter, 01:37:57.682 --> 01:37:59.390 align:middle line:84% in the sense that it's encouraging people 01:37:59.390 --> 01:38:00.540 align:middle line:90% to use public transportation. 01:38:00.540 --> 01:38:01.990 align:middle line:84% It's also pro-employee, because it 01:38:01.990 --> 01:38:04.280 align:middle line:84% makes their administrative burden much less. 01:38:04.280 --> 01:38:06.790 align:middle line:84% So I would urge favorable passage on this, Mr. President. 01:38:06.790 --> 01:38:07.997 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:38:07.997 --> 01:38:09.830 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:38:09.830 --> 01:38:11.130 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:38:11.130 --> 01:38:12.240 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:38:12.240 --> 01:38:13.120 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:38:13.120 --> 01:38:14.490 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:38:14.490 --> 01:38:17.370 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor, 01:38:17.370 --> 01:38:19.870 align:middle line:84% offers an amendment, the title of which the clerk will read. 01:38:19.870 --> 01:38:21.720 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 21 by Mr. O'Connor. 01:38:21.720 --> 01:38:23.850 align:middle line:90% Conductive Concrete Study. 01:38:23.850 --> 01:38:26.239 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr O'Connor. 01:38:26.239 --> 01:38:27.280 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:38:27.280 --> 01:38:28.650 align:middle line:90% Through you to the membership. 01:38:28.650 --> 01:38:31.101 align:middle line:84% This is an amendment that would call 01:38:31.101 --> 01:38:32.600 align:middle line:84% for the University of Massachusetts, 01:38:32.600 --> 01:38:34.016 align:middle line:84% one of the schools of engineering, 01:38:34.016 --> 01:38:36.710 align:middle line:84% to conduct a feasibility study for the benefits 01:38:36.710 --> 01:38:38.050 align:middle line:90% of conductive concrete. 01:38:38.050 --> 01:38:41.240 align:middle line:84% Conductive concrete is a relatively new invention 01:38:41.240 --> 01:38:43.920 align:middle line:84% from Christopher Tuan at the University of Nebraska 01:38:43.920 --> 01:38:44.900 align:middle line:90% at Lincoln. 01:38:44.900 --> 01:38:47.000 align:middle line:84% And essentially, what this conductive concrete 01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:49.280 align:middle line:84% does is it takes regular concrete, 01:38:49.280 --> 01:38:52.900 align:middle line:84% includes with it steel shavings and carbon powder, 01:38:52.900 --> 01:38:55.610 align:middle line:84% which make up about 20% of the entire mixture, 01:38:55.610 --> 01:38:59.580 align:middle line:84% to then essentially allow this concrete to heat 01:38:59.580 --> 01:39:03.270 align:middle line:90% with 48 volts of electricity. 01:39:03.270 --> 01:39:05.820 align:middle line:84% Which is below the standard that is 01:39:05.820 --> 01:39:07.940 align:middle line:90% set as far as for inspection. 01:39:07.940 --> 01:39:13.090 align:middle line:84% These 48-volt batteries are connected to a 220-volt source, 01:39:13.090 --> 01:39:16.980 align:middle line:84% and this source can then heat this concrete between 35 and 55 01:39:16.980 --> 01:39:18.060 align:middle line:90% degrees. 01:39:18.060 --> 01:39:21.740 align:middle line:84% This has been studied in multiple areas. 01:39:21.740 --> 01:39:25.226 align:middle line:84% There's five patents in five different countries. 01:39:25.226 --> 01:39:27.600 align:middle line:84% The individual who created this, again, Christopher Tuan, 01:39:27.600 --> 01:39:29.460 align:middle line:84% I talked to him on the phone recently and told him 01:39:29.460 --> 01:39:30.700 align:middle line:90% I was filing this amendment. 01:39:30.700 --> 01:39:33.272 align:middle line:84% And he was thrilled not only to get the call that this 01:39:33.272 --> 01:39:34.980 align:middle line:84% is going to get some momentum, but to get 01:39:34.980 --> 01:39:36.470 align:middle line:90% the call from Massachusetts. 01:39:36.470 --> 01:39:38.170 align:middle line:84% And being such an innovative state 01:39:38.170 --> 01:39:40.550 align:middle line:84% that we are, that this is something that he thought 01:39:40.550 --> 01:39:44.840 align:middle line:84% could bring tremendous benefit to the Commonwealth. 01:39:44.840 --> 01:39:47.510 align:middle line:84% The current installation of it in 01:39:47.510 --> 01:39:51.790 align:middle line:84% a 30-foot long, 7-foot wide bridge that they have 01:39:51.790 --> 01:39:53.810 align:middle line:90% costs an average of $3 a day. 01:39:53.810 --> 01:39:56.420 align:middle line:84% This electricity can also be turned off. 01:39:56.420 --> 01:39:58.540 align:middle line:84% So what they're doing right now in Nebraska 01:39:58.540 --> 01:40:00.250 align:middle line:84% is turning this on about three hours 01:40:00.250 --> 01:40:01.960 align:middle line:90% prior to a storm happening. 01:40:01.960 --> 01:40:04.740 align:middle line:84% And the bridges which they primarily 01:40:04.740 --> 01:40:07.730 align:middle line:84% put these on do not freeze, do not ice. 01:40:07.730 --> 01:40:11.120 align:middle line:84% Therefore, there's not an opportunity for the salt 01:40:11.120 --> 01:40:18.370 align:middle line:84% that we currently use, which is not good for our roadways. 01:40:18.370 --> 01:40:21.384 align:middle line:84% Massachusetts set aside $40 million-- 01:40:21.384 --> 01:40:22.800 align:middle line:84% just the financial impact of this. 01:40:22.800 --> 01:40:26.310 align:middle line:84% They set aside $40 million in 2014 to fix potholes. 01:40:26.310 --> 01:40:29.690 align:middle line:84% An average motorist spends $539 a year 01:40:29.690 --> 01:40:31.600 align:middle line:84% driving on roads in needs a repair. 01:40:31.600 --> 01:40:34.610 align:middle line:84% And salt and de-icing chemicals used on roadways corrode 01:40:34.610 --> 01:40:37.790 align:middle line:84% concrete, and they also cause serious negative impacts 01:40:37.790 --> 01:40:38.890 align:middle line:90% on our environment. 01:40:38.890 --> 01:40:42.390 align:middle line:84% And again, this isn't to go forward with anything drastic. 01:40:42.390 --> 01:40:44.697 align:middle line:84% This is just to say to one of our great schools 01:40:44.697 --> 01:40:46.780 align:middle line:84% of engineering at the University of Massachusetts, 01:40:46.780 --> 01:40:47.842 align:middle line:90% let's look into this. 01:40:47.842 --> 01:40:50.300 align:middle line:84% Let's see if this could be a cost-saver to the Commonwealth 01:40:50.300 --> 01:40:51.350 align:middle line:90% of Massachusetts. 01:40:51.350 --> 01:40:52.830 align:middle line:84% And also, let's see if this can be 01:40:52.830 --> 01:40:55.288 align:middle line:84% something that's going to be beneficial to our environment. 01:40:55.288 --> 01:40:58.080 align:middle line:90% I hope this amendment passes. 01:40:58.080 --> 01:41:00.560 align:middle line:84% The chair understands that there's 01:41:00.560 --> 01:41:03.110 align:middle line:84% a request been made to put this amendment on hold. 01:41:03.110 --> 01:41:05.640 align:middle line:90% 01:41:05.640 --> 01:41:08.680 align:middle line:84% Number 22, offered by the senator from Essex, Ms. Lovely. 01:41:08.680 --> 01:41:10.380 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:41:10.380 --> 01:41:14.650 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 22 by Ms. Lovely, Taxation of Cider. 01:41:14.650 --> 01:41:16.290 align:middle line:90% Question comes on the amendment. 01:41:16.290 --> 01:41:18.690 align:middle line:84% The Senator from Essex, Ms. Lovely. 01:41:18.690 --> 01:41:19.900 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:41:19.900 --> 01:41:22.860 align:middle line:84% Last year, I was contacted by a local cidery in my district, 01:41:22.860 --> 01:41:26.410 align:middle line:84% Far From the Tree Cider, about the taxation of hard cider. 01:41:26.410 --> 01:41:28.410 align:middle line:84% And I learned that there are 22 cideries 01:41:28.410 --> 01:41:30.970 align:middle line:84% and cider-producing breweries across the Commonwealth, 01:41:30.970 --> 01:41:33.530 align:middle line:84% and that hard cider is the fastest-growing segment 01:41:33.530 --> 01:41:35.250 align:middle line:90% of the alcohol market. 01:41:35.250 --> 01:41:37.790 align:middle line:84% Currently, Massachusetts law caps the cider tax rate 01:41:37.790 --> 01:41:40.270 align:middle line:90% at 6% alcohol by weight. 01:41:40.270 --> 01:41:43.390 align:middle line:84% Above 6%, cider is taxed as a sparkling wine 01:41:43.390 --> 01:41:44.910 align:middle line:90% at a much higher rate. 01:41:44.910 --> 01:41:49.090 align:middle line:84% Cider with an alcohol by weight between 3% and 6% is taxed 01:41:49.090 --> 01:41:52.450 align:middle line:84% at $0.03 per gallon, while champagne and other sparkling 01:41:52.450 --> 01:41:55.720 align:middle line:84% wines, including ciders above 6%, 01:41:55.720 --> 01:41:59.830 align:middle line:90% are taxed at $0.70 per gallon. 01:41:59.830 --> 01:42:01.890 align:middle line:84% Alcohol content for hard cider is 01:42:01.890 --> 01:42:03.690 align:middle line:84% closer to that of a beer or malt than it 01:42:03.690 --> 01:42:07.340 align:middle line:84% is to a sparkling wine, which has a much higher alcohol 01:42:07.340 --> 01:42:10.600 align:middle line:90% per volume level of 12% to 15%. 01:42:10.600 --> 01:42:13.420 align:middle line:84% So for these reasons, the Federal Congress 01:42:13.420 --> 01:42:15.990 align:middle line:90% passed the Cider Act of 2016. 01:42:15.990 --> 01:42:18.070 align:middle line:84% The Cider Act increases the alcohol 01:42:18.070 --> 01:42:21.130 align:middle line:84% by volume limit for alcoholic cider to 8.5%, 01:42:21.130 --> 01:42:22.800 align:middle line:84% in order to more accurately reflect 01:42:22.800 --> 01:42:25.370 align:middle line:84% the natural fermentation process of apples. 01:42:25.370 --> 01:42:28.670 align:middle line:84% That act went into effect on December 31st of 2016. 01:42:28.670 --> 01:42:30.810 align:middle line:84% And this amendment will bring Massachusetts in line 01:42:30.810 --> 01:42:32.620 align:middle line:84% the federal definition of hard cider 01:42:32.620 --> 01:42:36.320 align:middle line:84% by amending the Mass General Law to increase the minimum alcohol 01:42:36.320 --> 01:42:42.400 align:middle line:84% level for alcoholic cider to up to 8.5%. 01:42:42.400 --> 01:42:44.622 align:middle line:84% This will support a growing hard cider 01:42:44.622 --> 01:42:46.080 align:middle line:84% industry in our Commonwealth, and I 01:42:46.080 --> 01:42:47.250 align:middle line:90% hope the amendment is adopted. 01:42:47.250 --> 01:42:48.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:42:48.110 --> 01:42:48.610 align:middle line:90% Very good. 01:42:48.610 --> 01:42:50.840 align:middle line:84% Question of adoption of the amendment. 01:42:50.840 --> 01:42:52.420 align:middle line:90% All those in favor say "aye". 01:42:52.420 --> 01:42:53.600 align:middle line:90% Opposed, "no." 01:42:53.600 --> 01:42:54.470 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 01:42:54.470 --> 01:42:55.760 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:42:55.760 --> 01:42:57.450 align:middle line:84% Number 23, offered by the senator 01:42:57.450 --> 01:42:59.241 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:42:59.241 --> 01:43:01.040 align:middle line:84% The title of which the clerk will read. 01:43:01.040 --> 01:43:03.410 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 23 by Mr. Eldridge, 01:43:03.410 --> 01:43:06.716 align:middle line:84% Closing the Single Sales Factor Tax Loophole. 01:43:06.716 --> 01:43:08.840 align:middle line:84% Senator from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:43:08.840 --> 01:43:13.150 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, we wish to unanimously request 01:43:13.150 --> 01:43:14.787 align:middle line:90% withdrawal of the amendment. 01:43:14.787 --> 01:43:17.120 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] unanimous consent to withdraw the amendment. 01:43:17.120 --> 01:43:18.036 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:43:18.036 --> 01:43:19.220 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:43:19.220 --> 01:43:20.680 align:middle line:90% It is so ordered. 01:43:20.680 --> 01:43:23.590 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:43:23.590 --> 01:43:25.400 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentleman rise? 01:43:25.400 --> 01:43:27.420 align:middle line:84% I'd like to unanimously request permission 01:43:27.420 --> 01:43:28.680 align:middle line:90% to make a brief statement. 01:43:28.680 --> 01:43:29.820 align:middle line:84% Consent to make a brief statement. 01:43:29.820 --> 01:43:30.750 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:43:30.750 --> 01:43:32.120 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:43:32.120 --> 01:43:35.860 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Worcester, Mr. Eldridge. 01:43:35.860 --> 01:43:37.300 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:43:37.300 --> 01:43:40.650 align:middle line:84% The amendment that I had filed and just withdrew 01:43:40.650 --> 01:43:43.100 align:middle line:84% would have closed the single sales 01:43:43.100 --> 01:43:46.360 align:middle line:84% factor for the mutual fund industry, companies 01:43:46.360 --> 01:43:48.270 align:middle line:90% like Fidelity Investments. 01:43:48.270 --> 01:43:50.770 align:middle line:84% And really, this is the beginning 01:43:50.770 --> 01:43:52.980 align:middle line:84% of a conversation where we're making 01:43:52.980 --> 01:43:57.170 align:middle line:84% some progress in this budget on the appropriateness 01:43:57.170 --> 01:44:00.830 align:middle line:84% of continuing with the corporate tax credits that have passed, 01:44:00.830 --> 01:44:04.300 align:middle line:84% especially over the past 20 years. 01:44:04.300 --> 01:44:07.570 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, there's a report that we all 01:44:07.570 --> 01:44:10.360 align:middle line:84% received from the Mass Budget and Policy Center May 01:44:10.360 --> 01:44:13.720 align:middle line:84% 10th, The Growing Cost of Special Business Tax Break 01:44:13.720 --> 01:44:14.690 align:middle line:90% Spending. 01:44:14.690 --> 01:44:20.050 align:middle line:84% And I want to highlight that between 1996 and 2018, 01:44:20.050 --> 01:44:23.780 align:middle line:84% the tax breaks for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 01:44:23.780 --> 01:44:28.680 align:middle line:84% have risen from $370 million in fiscal year '96 01:44:28.680 --> 01:44:33.520 align:middle line:84% to about $1 billion in fiscal year 2013. 01:44:33.520 --> 01:44:37.600 align:middle line:84% Exactly the number that our structural budget deficit 01:44:37.600 --> 01:44:44.260 align:middle line:84% was before our April tax numbers came in, adding to the deficit. 01:44:44.260 --> 01:44:46.580 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I think it's time for us 01:44:46.580 --> 01:44:50.990 align:middle line:84% to revisit whether we can continue to pay 01:44:50.990 --> 01:44:52.740 align:middle line:90% for these corporate tax breaks. 01:44:52.740 --> 01:44:55.860 align:middle line:84% And I want to thank you, Mr. President, for your leadership, 01:44:55.860 --> 01:44:58.160 align:middle line:84% and the leadership of colleagues, 01:44:58.160 --> 01:45:01.010 align:middle line:84% in supporting tax expenditure commissions 01:45:01.010 --> 01:45:04.470 align:middle line:84% in previous budgets, previous jobs 01:45:04.470 --> 01:45:07.970 align:middle line:84% bills over the past session, that unfortunately did not 01:45:07.970 --> 01:45:09.800 align:middle line:90% become law. 01:45:09.800 --> 01:45:12.610 align:middle line:84% But it's important to emphasize that if we're 01:45:12.610 --> 01:45:15.800 align:middle line:84% really serious about investing in our communities, 01:45:15.800 --> 01:45:18.970 align:middle line:84% if we're serious about all the amendments that we have all 01:45:18.970 --> 01:45:23.580 align:middle line:84% filed to benefit our districts, to benefit people struggling 01:45:23.580 --> 01:45:27.540 align:middle line:84% with accessing housing, to protecting the environment, 01:45:27.540 --> 01:45:29.810 align:middle line:84% and to needing social services, we're 01:45:29.810 --> 01:45:32.180 align:middle line:84% going to need to have a conversation about closing 01:45:32.180 --> 01:45:34.340 align:middle line:90% corporate tax loopholes. 01:45:34.340 --> 01:45:39.840 align:middle line:84% Now, there is conversation about what the legislature could pass 01:45:39.840 --> 01:45:42.580 align:middle line:84% this session through the Mass Fair Share Amendment, 01:45:42.580 --> 01:45:44.980 align:middle line:84% and the voters could pass next year 01:45:44.980 --> 01:45:48.420 align:middle line:84% that would raise, perhaps, about $2 billion in revenue 01:45:48.420 --> 01:45:49.450 align:middle line:90% for the state. 01:45:49.450 --> 01:45:54.280 align:middle line:84% But the reality, Mr. President, is that money essentially 01:45:54.280 --> 01:45:57.810 align:middle line:84% has a commitment to being used for transportation or education 01:45:57.810 --> 01:45:58.860 align:middle line:90% costs. 01:45:58.860 --> 01:46:01.810 align:middle line:84% For those of us that care deeply about the environment, 01:46:01.810 --> 01:46:05.810 align:middle line:84% about human services, about making sure 01:46:05.810 --> 01:46:08.470 align:middle line:84% that the investments are made in every single one 01:46:08.470 --> 01:46:11.500 align:middle line:84% of our communities to oppose and stop poverty, 01:46:11.500 --> 01:46:14.240 align:middle line:84% we're going to have to raise more revenue. 01:46:14.240 --> 01:46:16.400 align:middle line:84% And what I would say, Mr. President, 01:46:16.400 --> 01:46:18.680 align:middle line:84% is that there are few better places 01:46:18.680 --> 01:46:22.980 align:middle line:84% to look at to find that revenue than the corporate tax 01:46:22.980 --> 01:46:26.410 align:middle line:84% breaks that we have picked and choosed for the past 20 years 01:46:26.410 --> 01:46:29.430 align:middle line:90% to very specific corporations. 01:46:29.430 --> 01:46:31.800 align:middle line:84% Now, the amendment that I filed to close 01:46:31.800 --> 01:46:35.840 align:middle line:84% the singles sales factor tax loophole for the mutual fund 01:46:35.840 --> 01:46:44.920 align:middle line:84% industry eliminates paying tax on the profits of products 01:46:44.920 --> 01:46:50.300 align:middle line:84% sold out-of-state by companies that exist in Massachusetts. 01:46:50.300 --> 01:46:54.720 align:middle line:84% A small estimate, and I passed out a handout, 01:46:54.720 --> 01:46:59.230 align:middle line:84% is that if a multi-state company makes $1 billion 01:46:59.230 --> 01:47:03.200 align:middle line:84% in total profits nationally, and 20% of those profits 01:47:03.200 --> 01:47:06.690 align:middle line:84% are in Massachusetts, before 1996, 01:47:06.690 --> 01:47:09.160 align:middle line:84% they would pay approximately $95 million 01:47:09.160 --> 01:47:11.140 align:middle line:90% in corporate excise tax. 01:47:11.140 --> 01:47:15.300 align:middle line:84% After 1996 changed, they would pay about $20 million 01:47:15.300 --> 01:47:16.470 align:middle line:90% in corporate excise tax. 01:47:16.470 --> 01:47:19.540 align:middle line:84% So you can think about the scale, Mr. President, 01:47:19.540 --> 01:47:21.570 align:middle line:84% about the revenue that we're losing. 01:47:21.570 --> 01:47:25.450 align:middle line:84% Now, this is a particularly outrageous corporate tax break 01:47:25.450 --> 01:47:28.970 align:middle line:84% because of the behavior of the corporation. 01:47:28.970 --> 01:47:32.350 align:middle line:84% This tax break was passed in 1996 01:47:32.350 --> 01:47:35.080 align:middle line:84% with a promise by Fidelity Investments 01:47:35.080 --> 01:47:37.830 align:middle line:84% that they would maintain the number of jobs 01:47:37.830 --> 01:47:39.170 align:middle line:90% they had in Massachusetts. 01:47:39.170 --> 01:47:43.090 align:middle line:84% At the time, it was about 10,000 people working at Fidelity. 01:47:43.090 --> 01:47:47.230 align:middle line:84% And part of that tax cut was a promise by Fidelity 01:47:47.230 --> 01:47:53.050 align:middle line:84% to keep that job workforce at 10,000 people for five years. 01:47:53.050 --> 01:47:56.820 align:middle line:84% Well, Mr. President, guess what happened in 2001? 01:47:56.820 --> 01:47:59.590 align:middle line:84% Fidelity Investments started shedding jobs, 01:47:59.590 --> 01:48:03.140 align:middle line:84% either laying people off, or sending jobs to other states. 01:48:03.140 --> 01:48:05.900 align:middle line:84% So that now, Mr. President, you have a workforce 01:48:05.900 --> 01:48:09.570 align:middle line:84% at Fidelity of around 5,000 people. 01:48:09.570 --> 01:48:11.590 align:middle line:84% But Fidelity Investments continues 01:48:11.590 --> 01:48:13.240 align:middle line:90% to receive this tax break. 01:48:13.240 --> 01:48:17.750 align:middle line:84% Last year, it cost us about $155 million, 01:48:17.750 --> 01:48:20.040 align:middle line:84% and it's estimated that this would 01:48:20.040 --> 01:48:23.300 align:middle line:84% cost about $143 million dollars for the Commonwealth. 01:48:23.300 --> 01:48:26.650 align:middle line:84% So at a time when we're facing the fact that we're not 01:48:26.650 --> 01:48:30.760 align:middle line:84% funding our education system well enough, that entities 01:48:30.760 --> 01:48:34.050 align:middle line:84% like the DP have lost a third of their workforce 01:48:34.050 --> 01:48:36.760 align:middle line:84% over the past 10 years, when we clearly 01:48:36.760 --> 01:48:39.230 align:middle line:84% have an inadequate transportation system, 01:48:39.230 --> 01:48:42.850 align:middle line:84% I would submit that it's time to look at corporate tax breaks 01:48:42.850 --> 01:48:46.880 align:middle line:84% like the single sales factor for the mutual fund industry. 01:48:46.880 --> 01:48:49.360 align:middle line:84% Now, Mr. President, we have the added concern, 01:48:49.360 --> 01:48:51.570 align:middle line:84% which has already been touched upon today, 01:48:51.570 --> 01:48:56.230 align:middle line:84% of federal budget cuts coming down to impact Massachusetts. 01:48:56.230 --> 01:48:59.430 align:middle line:84% And at a briefing that some senators received 01:48:59.430 --> 01:49:02.860 align:middle line:84% in Washington, DC, by the Mass Budget and Policy Center, 01:49:02.860 --> 01:49:07.410 align:middle line:84% we know that about 25% of our state budget 01:49:07.410 --> 01:49:11.280 align:middle line:84% is backed up by federal taxpayer dollars. 01:49:11.280 --> 01:49:13.540 align:middle line:84% So whether the Trump budget passes, 01:49:13.540 --> 01:49:15.490 align:middle line:84% which has just been proposed this week, 01:49:15.490 --> 01:49:17.950 align:middle line:84% or whether Republicans in Congress 01:49:17.950 --> 01:49:20.550 align:middle line:84% pass their own version of the budget, 01:49:20.550 --> 01:49:23.620 align:middle line:84% we know that cuts are going to happen in Massachusetts. 01:49:23.620 --> 01:49:27.610 align:middle line:84% We know there's going to be cuts to Medicaid, to housing, 01:49:27.610 --> 01:49:30.890 align:middle line:90% to the EPA, to human services. 01:49:30.890 --> 01:49:34.120 align:middle line:84% And that is going to make our job all the more difficult, 01:49:34.120 --> 01:49:36.570 align:middle line:84% not only to balance the budget, but making 01:49:36.570 --> 01:49:39.620 align:middle line:84% sure the investments that we have committed to 01:49:39.620 --> 01:49:42.180 align:middle line:90% in this budget are sustained. 01:49:42.180 --> 01:49:45.750 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I urge in the future 01:49:45.750 --> 01:49:48.540 align:middle line:84% that we strongly consider eliminating 01:49:48.540 --> 01:49:51.220 align:middle line:84% the single-sales factor for the mutual fund industry. 01:49:51.220 --> 01:49:54.330 align:middle line:84% I want to thank you, as well as the Chairwoman of Ways 01:49:54.330 --> 01:49:56.990 align:middle line:84% and Means, for putting into this budget 01:49:56.990 --> 01:50:04.590 align:middle line:84% a Tax Economic Development Commission that reviews, 01:50:04.590 --> 01:50:07.980 align:middle line:84% under our auditor, all of the corporate tax 01:50:07.980 --> 01:50:11.420 align:middle line:84% breaks that we currently issue in making recommendations 01:50:11.420 --> 01:50:12.740 align:middle line:90% to the legislature. 01:50:12.740 --> 01:50:16.680 align:middle line:84% Let's make sure that commission stays in this budget 01:50:16.680 --> 01:50:18.990 align:middle line:84% after the conference committee, and let's make 01:50:18.990 --> 01:50:21.100 align:middle line:84% sure we have an independent analysis 01:50:21.100 --> 01:50:23.980 align:middle line:84% about whether these corporate tax breaks are the best 01:50:23.980 --> 01:50:25.610 align:middle line:90% use of our taxpayer dollars. 01:50:25.610 --> 01:50:28.420 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:50:28.420 --> 01:50:30.470 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr? 01:50:30.470 --> 01:50:31.920 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:50:31.920 --> 01:50:35.070 align:middle line:84% I request unanimous consent to make a brief statement, 01:50:35.070 --> 01:50:37.600 align:middle line:90% but include a question there. 01:50:37.600 --> 01:50:38.860 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:50:38.860 --> 01:50:40.500 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:42.800 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, in [INAUDIBLE],, 01:50:42.800 --> 01:50:45.850 align:middle line:84% we believe as much as anyone in having proper analysis 01:50:45.850 --> 01:50:47.850 align:middle line:90% of so-called tax expenditures. 01:50:47.850 --> 01:50:50.650 align:middle line:84% I think too often, Mr. President, we 01:50:50.650 --> 01:50:54.060 align:middle line:84% forget about the fact that the money that we collect in taxes 01:50:54.060 --> 01:50:55.040 align:middle line:90% is not our money. 01:50:55.040 --> 01:50:57.490 align:middle line:84% It belongs to people, and we take it from them 01:50:57.490 --> 01:51:01.230 align:middle line:84% for various particular purposes, many of which are justified. 01:51:01.230 --> 01:51:04.080 align:middle line:84% But Mr. President, it seems to me 01:51:04.080 --> 01:51:08.600 align:middle line:84% that the particular tax relative to the single-sales factor 01:51:08.600 --> 01:51:10.610 align:middle line:84% for the financial services industry, one, 01:51:10.610 --> 01:51:14.110 align:middle line:84% was passed unanimously when it was passed in the Senate, 01:51:14.110 --> 01:51:17.290 align:middle line:84% and two, Mr. President, it seems to me-- 01:51:17.290 --> 01:51:20.150 align:middle line:84% and my recollection could be vague-- that what was required 01:51:20.150 --> 01:51:22.380 align:middle line:84% was that payroll was required to be maintained 01:51:22.380 --> 01:51:25.260 align:middle line:84% at a certain level, as opposed to number of employed 01:51:25.260 --> 01:51:26.300 align:middle line:90% positions. 01:51:26.300 --> 01:51:30.230 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, when we are facing a situation where 01:51:30.230 --> 01:51:33.950 align:middle line:84% we continue to look at why our economic recovery has not 01:51:33.950 --> 01:51:36.090 align:middle line:84% been as robust as we would hope it would be, 01:51:36.090 --> 01:51:39.250 align:middle line:84% I think we would do well to look at the issue of why 01:51:39.250 --> 01:51:41.700 align:middle line:90% wages are part of the problem. 01:51:41.700 --> 01:51:44.100 align:middle line:84% Because Mr. President, we understand 01:51:44.100 --> 01:51:47.130 align:middle line:84% that we have had a tremendous increase in employment. 01:51:47.130 --> 01:51:50.430 align:middle line:84% But many of those who have tried to understand the perplexing 01:51:50.430 --> 01:51:53.780 align:middle line:84% situation of why we haven't received commensurate 01:51:53.780 --> 01:51:56.740 align:middle line:84% increases in tax revenue have explained to us 01:51:56.740 --> 01:51:59.000 align:middle line:84% that one of the challenges that we face 01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:02.670 align:middle line:84% are having high-wage jobs that will contribute more 01:52:02.670 --> 01:52:05.760 align:middle line:84% to the income tax disproportionately than some 01:52:05.760 --> 01:52:08.640 align:middle line:84% of the lower-wage jobs, which are still important. 01:52:08.640 --> 01:52:11.050 align:middle line:84% And so we are presented, Mr. president, 01:52:11.050 --> 01:52:13.080 align:middle line:84% if that is true, with a challenge. 01:52:13.080 --> 01:52:15.960 align:middle line:84% And that challenge is to not only elevate 01:52:15.960 --> 01:52:18.740 align:middle line:84% those in Massachusetts who are currently earning a lower 01:52:18.740 --> 01:52:21.730 align:middle line:84% wage to positions where they earn a higher wage, 01:52:21.730 --> 01:52:25.180 align:middle line:84% but also not to chase out of the Commonwealth employers that 01:52:25.180 --> 01:52:28.530 align:middle line:84% are paying the higher wages and the people that work for them. 01:52:28.530 --> 01:52:31.480 align:middle line:84% That is why it was implicit, in my recollection, 01:52:31.480 --> 01:52:34.330 align:middle line:84% in the single-sales factor when it was passed 01:52:34.330 --> 01:52:36.340 align:middle line:84% through financial services, that we looked 01:52:36.340 --> 01:52:37.820 align:middle line:90% at the amount of payroll. 01:52:37.820 --> 01:52:40.500 align:middle line:84% And Mr. President, I stand to be corrected 01:52:40.500 --> 01:52:41.800 align:middle line:90% if that's not correct. 01:52:41.800 --> 01:52:43.480 align:middle line:84% But I also hope that we will look 01:52:43.480 --> 01:52:46.800 align:middle line:84% at the payroll of these financial services companies. 01:52:46.800 --> 01:52:49.040 align:middle line:84% And when we look at our tax expenditure 01:52:49.040 --> 01:52:52.580 align:middle line:84% review and consider the very interesting problem 01:52:52.580 --> 01:52:54.110 align:middle line:90% that we have, Mr. President-- 01:52:54.110 --> 01:52:56.340 align:middle line:84% not that we have too many of these employers, 01:52:56.340 --> 01:52:59.890 align:middle line:84% but we have too few, and too few high-wage employees-- 01:52:59.890 --> 01:53:02.830 align:middle line:84% to be able to contribute money for the kind of priorities that 01:53:02.830 --> 01:53:04.140 align:middle line:90% are reflected in this budget. 01:53:04.140 --> 01:53:06.420 align:middle line:84% I hope we'll look at this carefully. 01:53:06.420 --> 01:53:09.660 align:middle line:84% The senator from Bristol and Plymouth, Mr. Montigny. 01:53:09.660 --> 01:53:11.540 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, it's early in the budget, 01:53:11.540 --> 01:53:14.860 align:middle line:84% and I find myself in the place of strongly disagreeing 01:53:14.860 --> 01:53:16.010 align:middle line:90% with the minority leader. 01:53:16.010 --> 01:53:19.500 align:middle line:84% But I'm not going to take him on on this argument from 01:53:19.500 --> 01:53:22.480 align:middle line:84% the progressive side-- which I could do, perhaps-- 01:53:22.480 --> 01:53:27.477 align:middle line:84% because I, for one, have worked with some of these folks 01:53:27.477 --> 01:53:29.060 align:middle line:84% to close the loopholes over the years, 01:53:29.060 --> 01:53:32.540 align:middle line:84% not so much so that we have more money to spend on programs, 01:53:32.540 --> 01:53:36.220 align:middle line:84% although, I think we should have honest debates every budget 01:53:36.220 --> 01:53:38.420 align:middle line:84% and every session on what priorities are. 01:53:38.420 --> 01:53:40.940 align:middle line:84% And there are some very legitimate concerns 01:53:40.940 --> 01:53:44.850 align:middle line:84% people have right now in, are we meeting our basic needs? 01:53:44.850 --> 01:53:46.830 align:middle line:84% But I argue it from a market perspective. 01:53:46.830 --> 01:53:49.510 align:middle line:84% You've heard me say many times on this floor 01:53:49.510 --> 01:53:51.775 align:middle line:84% that perhaps I've had more experience, 01:53:51.775 --> 01:53:53.650 align:middle line:84% particularly prior to coming to the building. 01:53:53.650 --> 01:53:54.860 align:middle line:84% But now that I've been here so long, 01:53:54.860 --> 01:53:56.570 align:middle line:84% I can no longer say things like, well, I've 01:53:56.570 --> 01:53:58.000 align:middle line:84% had more time in the market than I 01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:01.139 align:middle line:84% have in the odd place of government, 01:54:01.139 --> 01:54:02.930 align:middle line:84% because now I've been here so long that I'm 01:54:02.930 --> 01:54:05.130 align:middle line:84% a member of that-- a proud member. 01:54:05.130 --> 01:54:07.570 align:middle line:84% But I still think through these things 01:54:07.570 --> 01:54:12.120 align:middle line:84% first and foremost as market decisions. 01:54:12.120 --> 01:54:15.700 align:middle line:84% When a government body makes a decision to give these away-- 01:54:15.700 --> 01:54:19.770 align:middle line:84% and many times, they are exactly what I call them, 01:54:19.770 --> 01:54:21.750 align:middle line:84% and I know perhaps I've over used the word, 01:54:21.750 --> 01:54:25.100 align:middle line:84% only because we have over-used the tax break-- 01:54:25.100 --> 01:54:27.970 align:middle line:84% in many cases, they're just well-lobbied boondoggles. 01:54:27.970 --> 01:54:29.220 align:middle line:90% There's a flavor of the month. 01:54:29.220 --> 01:54:31.530 align:middle line:84% The Tom Cruise comes to town with Johnny Depp 01:54:31.530 --> 01:54:33.690 align:middle line:84% and says, give us more money, and we do. 01:54:33.690 --> 01:54:36.430 align:middle line:84% So we have a $100 million film tax credit. 01:54:36.430 --> 01:54:40.820 align:middle line:84% Fidelity says in 1996, give us money or we'll leave. 01:54:40.820 --> 01:54:42.210 align:middle line:90% So we do. 01:54:42.210 --> 01:54:47.070 align:middle line:84% I happen to have the great honor at the time to sit in the room 01:54:47.070 --> 01:54:49.840 align:middle line:84% as the Ways and Means chairman when Bob Kraft was 01:54:49.840 --> 01:54:51.100 align:middle line:90% looking for a free stadium. 01:54:51.100 --> 01:54:54.100 align:middle line:84% And I'm so happy that we were able to tell 01:54:54.100 --> 01:54:57.287 align:middle line:84% the very successful, wonderful, popular billionaire, 01:54:57.287 --> 01:54:58.870 align:middle line:84% we're not going to build your stadium. 01:54:58.870 --> 01:54:59.507 align:middle line:90% We helped him. 01:54:59.507 --> 01:55:01.340 align:middle line:84% We did the infrastructure that we should do. 01:55:01.340 --> 01:55:03.180 align:middle line:84% We encouraged the team to stay here. 01:55:03.180 --> 01:55:05.120 align:middle line:84% But anybody who fell for the bluff 01:55:05.120 --> 01:55:08.560 align:middle line:84% that Bob Kraft was going to move his team to, I don't know, 01:55:08.560 --> 01:55:09.090 align:middle line:90% where? 01:55:09.090 --> 01:55:10.240 align:middle line:90% Where was he going to go? 01:55:10.240 --> 01:55:13.120 align:middle line:84% The NFL was saying, you're not going anywhere. 01:55:13.120 --> 01:55:15.637 align:middle line:84% It's based on a media market in Boston. 01:55:15.637 --> 01:55:17.720 align:middle line:84% No, you're not going to move down to Rhode Island. 01:55:17.720 --> 01:55:20.550 align:middle line:84% That's a joke and a bluff, but some people fell for it. 01:55:20.550 --> 01:55:25.030 align:middle line:84% You're not going to move to some faraway place. 01:55:25.030 --> 01:55:32.760 align:middle line:84% There was lots of choice places within the bluff. 01:55:32.760 --> 01:55:36.310 align:middle line:84% Same thing-- I am not arguing the merits 01:55:36.310 --> 01:55:39.060 align:middle line:90% of the decision at the time. 01:55:39.060 --> 01:55:42.430 align:middle line:84% What I'm saying is that the world changes, 01:55:42.430 --> 01:55:44.620 align:middle line:84% and government is always the last to figure it out, 01:55:44.620 --> 01:55:46.020 align:middle line:90% it seems. 01:55:46.020 --> 01:55:48.610 align:middle line:84% Because here's what's happened with the marketplace. 01:55:48.610 --> 01:55:52.780 align:middle line:84% Companies like Vanguard and BlackRock and others 01:55:52.780 --> 01:55:55.890 align:middle line:90% have tooled, in quotes-- 01:55:55.890 --> 01:55:58.920 align:middle line:84% excuse the term-- the companies who 01:55:58.920 --> 01:56:02.900 align:middle line:84% have held fast to manage mutual funds with high fees. 01:56:02.900 --> 01:56:04.930 align:middle line:90% Very simple reason why-- 01:56:04.930 --> 01:56:07.090 align:middle line:90% very simple reason why. 01:56:07.090 --> 01:56:10.060 align:middle line:84% All of the studies and all of the calculations show that 01:56:10.060 --> 01:56:14.170 align:middle line:84% if you put your money in a very low-fee index fund over 01:56:14.170 --> 01:56:17.520 align:middle line:84% the last 10 years, you've done far better than dealing-- 01:56:17.520 --> 01:56:19.160 align:middle line:90% and I'm sorry, sorry folks. 01:56:19.160 --> 01:56:21.830 align:middle line:84% Very happy that State Street is in Massachusetts. 01:56:21.830 --> 01:56:23.990 align:middle line:84% Very happy that Fidelity is here. 01:56:23.990 --> 01:56:25.400 align:middle line:90% But I'm a markets guy. 01:56:25.400 --> 01:56:28.170 align:middle line:84% If somebody lets me save a nickel off their fee, 01:56:28.170 --> 01:56:31.260 align:middle line:84% I'm spending my money somewhere else. 01:56:31.260 --> 01:56:32.730 align:middle line:90% That's what we should be doing. 01:56:32.730 --> 01:56:34.810 align:middle line:90% We passed this break in '96. 01:56:34.810 --> 01:56:36.240 align:middle line:84% It may have made sense back then. 01:56:36.240 --> 01:56:37.886 align:middle line:84% Again, I'm not arguing the merits. 01:56:37.886 --> 01:56:39.010 align:middle line:90% I'm not arguing the merits. 01:56:39.010 --> 01:56:43.740 align:middle line:84% I'm saying it's 2017, and payroll-- 01:56:43.740 --> 01:56:46.450 align:middle line:84% well, of course, if you want to calculate payroll, 01:56:46.450 --> 01:56:50.360 align:middle line:84% look at the salary of Abigail Johnson and anybody else 01:56:50.360 --> 01:56:51.000 align:middle line:90% at Fidelity. 01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000 align:middle line:84% I mean, if it's only based on payroll, 01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:54.990 align:middle line:84% then all we're doing is rewarding people 01:56:54.990 --> 01:56:58.700 align:middle line:84% for paying the absolute highest salaries to a few folks, 01:56:58.700 --> 01:57:01.960 align:middle line:84% and not keeping up to the job creation suggested. 01:57:01.960 --> 01:57:03.660 align:middle line:84% I'm not blaming this on Fidelity. 01:57:03.660 --> 01:57:05.969 align:middle line:84% And by the way, it's unbelievable. 01:57:05.969 --> 01:57:06.760 align:middle line:90% I'd love to own it. 01:57:06.760 --> 01:57:08.160 align:middle line:90% It's a privately held company. 01:57:08.160 --> 01:57:10.630 align:middle line:84% I'd love to be standing here or out in the hall 01:57:10.630 --> 01:57:13.650 align:middle line:84% defending the tax break to you and benefiting from it. 01:57:13.650 --> 01:57:16.080 align:middle line:84% But I'm here to represent constituents, 01:57:16.080 --> 01:57:18.590 align:middle line:84% not so I can grab the money and spend it. 01:57:18.590 --> 01:57:20.030 align:middle line:84% Here's what I'm here to tell you, 01:57:20.030 --> 01:57:22.960 align:middle line:84% since the minority leader made a very good point, 01:57:22.960 --> 01:57:24.780 align:middle line:90% it is not our money. 01:57:24.780 --> 01:57:27.980 align:middle line:84% But here's the funny thing we've done since we gave these tax 01:57:27.980 --> 01:57:30.620 align:middle line:84% breaks to specific flavor-of-the-month companies, 01:57:30.620 --> 01:57:33.020 align:middle line:84% like the boondoggle we get to the biotech industry 01:57:33.020 --> 01:57:35.400 align:middle line:84% that's dying to be in the state because of the best 01:57:35.400 --> 01:57:37.820 align:middle line:84% universities and research hospitals in the country. 01:57:37.820 --> 01:57:39.920 align:middle line:84% And we make it a good place, and their executives 01:57:39.920 --> 01:57:42.140 align:middle line:84% want to be here, and we help them save lives. 01:57:42.140 --> 01:57:43.730 align:middle line:90% We respect their work. 01:57:43.730 --> 01:57:45.430 align:middle line:84% But the two things we don't belong doing 01:57:45.430 --> 01:57:48.190 align:middle line:84% is simply overpaying for drugs because they tell us 01:57:48.190 --> 01:57:51.310 align:middle line:84% they want us to, and then give them $1 billion over 10 years. 01:57:51.310 --> 01:57:52.180 align:middle line:90% Why? 01:57:52.180 --> 01:57:54.400 align:middle line:84% If the money was growing on trees 01:57:54.400 --> 01:57:57.510 align:middle line:84% and flowing as easily as we all wish, 01:57:57.510 --> 01:57:59.470 align:middle line:84% perhaps you could make the argument. 01:57:59.470 --> 01:58:02.540 align:middle line:84% But if not, every program and every dollar we 01:58:02.540 --> 01:58:05.490 align:middle line:84% spend and every tax break we grant, 01:58:05.490 --> 01:58:07.084 align:middle line:84% we ought to know the efficacy of it. 01:58:07.084 --> 01:58:08.500 align:middle line:84% And you've heard me say it before, 01:58:08.500 --> 01:58:11.470 align:middle line:90% but I want to remind you. 01:58:11.470 --> 01:58:14.450 align:middle line:84% Very few days in this building where I felt embarrassed, 01:58:14.450 --> 01:58:16.300 align:middle line:84% because I'm proud to serve here-- 01:58:16.300 --> 01:58:18.110 align:middle line:84% that doesn't mean we couldn't do better-- 01:58:18.110 --> 01:58:20.720 align:middle line:84% and I sat and listened to a prior governor 01:58:20.720 --> 01:58:22.840 align:middle line:84% and his secretary of economic affairs. 01:58:22.840 --> 01:58:25.170 align:middle line:84% And I had some very simple questions, Mr. President, 01:58:25.170 --> 01:58:27.820 align:middle line:90% like, how does it work? 01:58:27.820 --> 01:58:29.320 align:middle line:90% How much does it cost? 01:58:29.320 --> 01:58:30.760 align:middle line:90% How many jobs does it create? 01:58:30.760 --> 01:58:33.110 align:middle line:90% How many jobs does it retain? 01:58:33.110 --> 01:58:37.300 align:middle line:84% But for this grant or tax break, would 01:58:37.300 --> 01:58:39.940 align:middle line:84% the private sector company make the decision anyway? 01:58:39.940 --> 01:58:41.180 align:middle line:90% Because here's what I know. 01:58:41.180 --> 01:58:44.920 align:middle line:84% Almost no chief executives of companies, many of whom 01:58:44.920 --> 01:58:48.040 align:middle line:84% I've invested in personally or as a former chamber of commerce 01:58:48.040 --> 01:58:50.240 align:middle line:84% president, listened to them doing their bidding 01:58:50.240 --> 01:58:51.940 align:middle line:90% on economic development issues. 01:58:51.940 --> 01:58:55.140 align:middle line:84% And almost, to a person, not one has ever said, 01:58:55.140 --> 01:58:58.500 align:middle line:84% we make the decision solely based on some tax giveaway. 01:58:58.500 --> 01:59:00.980 align:middle line:84% We want comfortable regulatory environment. 01:59:00.980 --> 01:59:02.740 align:middle line:90% We want educated people. 01:59:02.740 --> 01:59:06.600 align:middle line:84% We want good roads and bridges and infrastructure 01:59:06.600 --> 01:59:10.090 align:middle line:84% and a good public transportation service, et cetera, et cetera. 01:59:10.090 --> 01:59:13.000 align:middle line:84% Almost never do they say, just give us one 01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:14.320 align:middle line:90% of those wonderful giveaways. 01:59:14.320 --> 01:59:18.300 align:middle line:84% And then, of course, it's their fiduciary responsibility-- 01:59:18.300 --> 01:59:20.360 align:middle line:84% whether it's a private company, and particularly 01:59:20.360 --> 01:59:22.020 align:middle line:84% when it's a stockholder company-- 01:59:22.020 --> 01:59:25.650 align:middle line:84% if you offer the money, they'll take it. 01:59:25.650 --> 01:59:27.760 align:middle line:84% That's the fiduciary responsibility. 01:59:27.760 --> 01:59:30.680 align:middle line:84% That's what shareholders expect from management. 01:59:30.680 --> 01:59:33.520 align:middle line:84% But what the taxpayers expect from us, Mr. President-- 01:59:33.520 --> 01:59:36.470 align:middle line:84% whether it's the film tax, the single sales factor, 01:59:36.470 --> 01:59:38.360 align:middle line:90% you go down the list. 01:59:38.360 --> 01:59:40.459 align:middle line:84% I'm not saying get rid of everyone. 01:59:40.459 --> 01:59:42.250 align:middle line:84% I'm saying that we should-- and by the way, 01:59:42.250 --> 01:59:44.070 align:middle line:84% I said this 10 years ago and everybody said, well, 01:59:44.070 --> 01:59:44.580 align:middle line:90% there's a tax commission. 01:59:44.580 --> 01:59:45.250 align:middle line:90% There's this commission. 01:59:45.250 --> 01:59:46.640 align:middle line:84% There's this commission, there's that commission. 01:59:46.640 --> 01:59:48.120 align:middle line:84% We're going to do this, we're going to do that. 01:59:48.120 --> 01:59:49.619 align:middle line:84% And the only thing that has remained 01:59:49.619 --> 01:59:52.990 align:middle line:84% the same is all of those tax breaks 01:59:52.990 --> 01:59:57.030 align:middle line:84% are still baked into our base, and none of them 01:59:57.030 --> 02:00:00.650 align:middle line:84% have been judged by the efficacy of how they actually stimulate 02:00:00.650 --> 02:00:03.110 align:middle line:90% the economy and create jobs. 02:00:03.110 --> 02:00:05.034 align:middle line:90% Why is that important? 02:00:05.034 --> 02:00:06.950 align:middle line:84% Again, I'll conclude with this, Mr. President. 02:00:06.950 --> 02:00:10.820 align:middle line:84% Not because I want to argue for more revenue for more 02:00:10.820 --> 02:00:11.870 align:middle line:90% programmatic spending-- 02:00:11.870 --> 02:00:12.980 align:middle line:90% quite the opposite. 02:00:12.980 --> 02:00:16.240 align:middle line:84% I voted against the sales tax in this body 02:00:16.240 --> 02:00:20.310 align:middle line:84% and had, to the chagrin of some of my progressive fellow 02:00:20.310 --> 02:00:23.510 align:middle line:84% senators who felt we were so desperate at the time 02:00:23.510 --> 02:00:26.450 align:middle line:84% that we needed more revenue, I voted against the increase 02:00:26.450 --> 02:00:27.857 align:middle line:84% in the transportation tax, partly 02:00:27.857 --> 02:00:30.190 align:middle line:84% because I didn't agree with the way it was put together. 02:00:30.190 --> 02:00:33.400 align:middle line:84% But this was my consistent reasoning, Mr. President. 02:00:33.400 --> 02:00:37.940 align:middle line:84% Until and unless we take back what isn't working-- 02:00:37.940 --> 02:00:40.560 align:middle line:84% and we respect that the marketplace over the last 20 02:00:40.560 --> 02:00:43.020 align:middle line:84% years has completely changed with mutual funds. 02:00:43.020 --> 02:00:44.510 align:middle line:90% It's not the same world. 02:00:44.510 --> 02:00:48.080 align:middle line:84% And ironically, Fidelity is actually now doing well, 02:00:48.080 --> 02:00:50.140 align:middle line:84% because they finally woke up to that. 02:00:50.140 --> 02:00:52.510 align:middle line:84% They understand that the world changed. 02:00:52.510 --> 02:00:56.230 align:middle line:84% Those high-fee, highly-managed mutual funds no longer 02:00:56.230 --> 02:00:59.870 align:middle line:84% are in demand the way that low-fee index funds are. 02:00:59.870 --> 02:01:02.400 align:middle line:84% By the way, take a look at your retirement account. 02:01:02.400 --> 02:01:05.560 align:middle line:84% And study every single percentage in that account. 02:01:05.560 --> 02:01:08.370 align:middle line:84% And unless there's a 10-year track record where they've 02:01:08.370 --> 02:01:13.070 align:middle line:84% gone beyond the index fund, dump the company and the higher fee, 02:01:13.070 --> 02:01:14.960 align:middle line:84% including if it's a Massachusetts company. 02:01:14.960 --> 02:01:17.430 align:middle line:84% Put your retirement money thinking of yourself. 02:01:17.430 --> 02:01:20.160 align:middle line:84% And that is the lowest fee relative to the highest rate 02:01:20.160 --> 02:01:21.270 align:middle line:90% of return. 02:01:21.270 --> 02:01:22.560 align:middle line:90% How is that relevant to this? 02:01:22.560 --> 02:01:26.100 align:middle line:84% Very, very simply-- the industry has changed. 02:01:26.100 --> 02:01:28.462 align:middle line:84% It's good that they're employing less people, 02:01:28.462 --> 02:01:29.420 align:middle line:90% from their perspective. 02:01:29.420 --> 02:01:31.419 align:middle line:84% It might not be good for those that are laid off 02:01:31.419 --> 02:01:34.140 align:middle line:84% and it might not be good for our overall economy. 02:01:34.140 --> 02:01:37.820 align:middle line:84% But the marketplace dictates that Fidelity change. 02:01:37.820 --> 02:01:40.350 align:middle line:84% I'm not disrespecting that they have less headcount. 02:01:40.350 --> 02:01:42.010 align:middle line:90% That's not for me to decide. 02:01:42.010 --> 02:01:44.410 align:middle line:90% The market is very harsh. 02:01:44.410 --> 02:01:47.740 align:middle line:84% What I'm complaining about is we as a government 02:01:47.740 --> 02:01:50.260 align:middle line:84% are 20 years behind the eight ball, as usual. 02:01:50.260 --> 02:01:51.760 align:middle line:84% And if I want to be charitable, I'll 02:01:51.760 --> 02:01:54.218 align:middle line:84% say we're five or six or seven years, because a lot of this 02:01:54.218 --> 02:01:56.800 align:middle line:84% has happened in the more recent years. 02:01:56.800 --> 02:01:58.070 align:middle line:90% And here's what we did. 02:01:58.070 --> 02:02:02.200 align:middle line:84% Fidelity signed a deal, because whenever a private sector 02:02:02.200 --> 02:02:02.810 align:middle line:90% company-- 02:02:02.810 --> 02:02:04.390 align:middle line:84% the defense industry is a better example. 02:02:04.390 --> 02:02:05.556 align:middle line:90% I won't get into that today. 02:02:05.556 --> 02:02:07.420 align:middle line:84% But whenever a private sector company 02:02:07.420 --> 02:02:09.930 align:middle line:84% has their team of lawyers across the table, 02:02:09.930 --> 02:02:11.940 align:middle line:84% like we did with the Big Dig negotiations 02:02:11.940 --> 02:02:14.620 align:middle line:84% with the Bechtel family, whenever the counterparty is 02:02:14.620 --> 02:02:17.600 align:middle line:84% government, you can be sure we lose almost every negotiation. 02:02:17.600 --> 02:02:19.600 align:middle line:84% And I said that at public hearings and meetings, 02:02:19.600 --> 02:02:21.710 align:middle line:84% and people said, ah, where'd you come up with that? 02:02:21.710 --> 02:02:23.010 align:middle line:84% And then I say, well, I challenge you. 02:02:23.010 --> 02:02:24.380 align:middle line:90% Go out and find a good deal. 02:02:24.380 --> 02:02:25.780 align:middle line:90% This is a lousy deal. 02:02:25.780 --> 02:02:29.330 align:middle line:84% We got a five-year sunset on the jobs, 02:02:29.330 --> 02:02:32.210 align:middle line:90% but we didn't sunset the break. 02:02:32.210 --> 02:02:34.830 align:middle line:84% Now, where can I sign up for that deal? 02:02:34.830 --> 02:02:37.390 align:middle line:84% I make a commitment to you to do something. 02:02:37.390 --> 02:02:41.090 align:middle line:84% And remember, this is economic development public policy, 02:02:41.090 --> 02:02:42.510 align:middle line:90% Mr. President. 02:02:42.510 --> 02:02:45.140 align:middle line:90% So the policy-- 02:02:45.140 --> 02:02:47.240 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I can't hear myself think-- 02:02:47.240 --> 02:02:50.300 align:middle line:84% which perhaps is good, but if you could just-- 02:02:50.300 --> 02:02:55.260 align:middle line:90% 02:02:55.260 --> 02:02:55.760 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:02:55.760 --> 02:02:59.350 align:middle line:90% 02:02:59.350 --> 02:03:04.130 align:middle line:84% The chair asks that the chair and others respect the fact 02:03:04.130 --> 02:03:07.510 align:middle line:84% that the gentleman is speaking, and that we subdue 02:03:07.510 --> 02:03:10.790 align:middle line:84% our conversations so that the gentleman's comments may 02:03:10.790 --> 02:03:12.460 align:middle line:90% be heard. 02:03:12.460 --> 02:03:17.460 align:middle line:84% I have no doubt that [INAUDIBLE] off my mark. 02:03:17.460 --> 02:03:18.980 align:middle line:90% So I'll sit down. 02:03:18.980 --> 02:03:19.980 align:middle line:90% And I promise I will. 02:03:19.980 --> 02:03:20.499 align:middle line:90% I promise. 02:03:20.499 --> 02:03:21.290 align:middle line:90% I'm on a roll here. 02:03:21.290 --> 02:03:23.700 align:middle line:84% This is why my staff attempts to write my speeches 02:03:23.700 --> 02:03:25.690 align:middle line:84% and I never read them, because then I 02:03:25.690 --> 02:03:27.850 align:middle line:90% wouldn't get rolling like this. 02:03:27.850 --> 02:03:30.610 align:middle line:84% I honestly want to close with this, on a serious note. 02:03:30.610 --> 02:03:33.630 align:middle line:84% I don't just respect the decision made in fiscal year 02:03:33.630 --> 02:03:34.460 align:middle line:90% '96. 02:03:34.460 --> 02:03:36.490 align:middle line:84% I don't disrespect the company that has done 02:03:36.490 --> 02:03:38.030 align:middle line:90% enormous good in this state. 02:03:38.030 --> 02:03:40.420 align:middle line:84% What I'm saying is, when a government 02:03:40.420 --> 02:03:45.940 align:middle line:84% makes a policy decision to provide a grant or a tax break, 02:03:45.940 --> 02:03:48.580 align:middle line:84% it ought to be based on that policy. 02:03:48.580 --> 02:03:53.080 align:middle line:84% But for this, the private sector might not have done x. 02:03:53.080 --> 02:03:55.490 align:middle line:84% In this case, I'm not even trying 02:03:55.490 --> 02:03:57.410 align:middle line:84% to argue whether they kept to their bargain. 02:03:57.410 --> 02:03:59.570 align:middle line:84% I'm saying they signed a five-year deal 02:03:59.570 --> 02:04:02.250 align:middle line:84% and we gave them a lifetime annuity. 02:04:02.250 --> 02:04:04.590 align:middle line:84% I mean, I've never seen anything like it. 02:04:04.590 --> 02:04:06.947 align:middle line:84% I wonder how I chose a career, because I'd 02:04:06.947 --> 02:04:09.030 align:middle line:84% like to choose a career where I can get that deal. 02:04:09.030 --> 02:04:12.450 align:middle line:84% I want to make a commitment to you for five years, 02:04:12.450 --> 02:04:14.940 align:middle line:84% and I want you to pay me for it for the next 20 or 30. 02:04:14.940 --> 02:04:16.260 align:middle line:90% I'll sign that deal. 02:04:16.260 --> 02:04:18.880 align:middle line:84% So Mr. President, I hope, in the commission 02:04:18.880 --> 02:04:21.500 align:middle line:84% that we've put together, we will finally-- 02:04:21.500 --> 02:04:24.010 align:middle line:84% and I have no doubt, because I've listened to Senate members 02:04:24.010 --> 02:04:24.350 align:middle line:90% on this. 02:04:24.350 --> 02:04:25.580 align:middle line:84% These are not easy votes, but I've 02:04:25.580 --> 02:04:26.780 align:middle line:90% listened to Senate members. 02:04:26.780 --> 02:04:29.470 align:middle line:84% The only thing I'm asking is that we 02:04:29.470 --> 02:04:32.880 align:middle line:84% keep every tax break that actually meets 02:04:32.880 --> 02:04:34.780 align:middle line:84% the need of job creation in this state 02:04:34.780 --> 02:04:37.650 align:middle line:84% and kill every one that doesn't meet the purpose that we set. 02:04:37.650 --> 02:04:41.010 align:middle line:84% And the way you do that is you sunset every single, one 02:04:41.010 --> 02:04:46.110 align:middle line:84% and then you make the proponents prove that it works. 02:04:46.110 --> 02:04:48.740 align:middle line:84% We will save billions of dollars. 02:04:48.740 --> 02:04:51.960 align:middle line:84% And I'm not making the judgment whether progressives 02:04:51.960 --> 02:04:53.090 align:middle line:90% should win on spending it. 02:04:53.090 --> 02:04:55.680 align:middle line:84% I'm saying I don't ever want to take another penny out 02:04:55.680 --> 02:04:58.350 align:middle line:84% of a working person's pocket on something like the sales tax 02:04:58.350 --> 02:05:00.940 align:middle line:84% when I'm giving the Johnson family $140 million, 02:05:00.940 --> 02:05:01.680 align:middle line:90% or whatever. 02:05:01.680 --> 02:05:03.870 align:middle line:84% I mean, they're not the only mutual fund company 02:05:03.870 --> 02:05:04.590 align:middle line:90% in Massachusetts. 02:05:04.590 --> 02:05:07.480 align:middle line:84% But it's clear it was named the Fidelity tax 02:05:07.480 --> 02:05:09.090 align:middle line:90% break for a reason. 02:05:09.090 --> 02:05:10.870 align:middle line:84% And it's got to stop, Mr. President. 02:05:10.870 --> 02:05:13.650 align:middle line:84% Or at least, we have to be able to justify it. 02:05:13.650 --> 02:05:16.440 align:middle line:84% I will sign on to any of those breaks, 02:05:16.440 --> 02:05:20.320 align:middle line:84% again, if we sunset them and judge them for their efficacy 02:05:20.320 --> 02:05:22.140 align:middle line:84% on how they help the average person that's 02:05:22.140 --> 02:05:23.630 align:middle line:90% paying the highest sales tax. 02:05:23.630 --> 02:05:25.650 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:05:25.650 --> 02:05:27.889 align:middle line:84% The next amendment before us is #24, 02:05:27.889 --> 02:05:29.930 align:middle line:84% offered by the senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, 02:05:29.930 --> 02:05:32.138 align:middle line:84% Mr. O'Connor, the title of which the clerk will read. 02:05:32.138 --> 02:05:35.884 align:middle line:84% Amendment #24 by Mr. O'Connor, electronic communications. 02:05:35.884 --> 02:05:38.050 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor. 02:05:38.050 --> 02:05:40.591 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the membership. 02:05:40.591 --> 02:05:44.180 align:middle line:84% This amendment very easily changes the way 02:05:44.180 --> 02:05:47.010 align:middle line:84% that the unemployment assistance works. 02:05:47.010 --> 02:05:52.850 align:middle line:84% Right now, it's an opt-out provision for postal service. 02:05:52.850 --> 02:05:57.270 align:middle line:84% This would be an opt-in correspondence 02:05:57.270 --> 02:05:58.640 align:middle line:90% with email service. 02:05:58.640 --> 02:06:01.900 align:middle line:84% Right now, the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce 02:06:01.900 --> 02:06:05.630 align:middle line:84% Development says that 80% of the claims that 02:06:05.630 --> 02:06:09.190 align:middle line:84% are filed with unemployment are filed via the internet, 02:06:09.190 --> 02:06:13.230 align:middle line:84% and that the users of unemployment assistance 02:06:13.230 --> 02:06:15.770 align:middle line:84% are computer literate and have access to the internet. 02:06:15.770 --> 02:06:18.570 align:middle line:84% Therefore, they may be more comfortable with email. 02:06:18.570 --> 02:06:21.490 align:middle line:84% Right now, the postage cost to the executive offices 02:06:21.490 --> 02:06:23.430 align:middle line:84% is a half a million dollars a year. 02:06:23.430 --> 02:06:26.117 align:middle line:84% The funding comes from an administrative grant, as well 02:06:26.117 --> 02:06:27.200 align:middle line:90% as the federal government. 02:06:27.200 --> 02:06:30.140 align:middle line:84% And rather than spending this limited funding on postage, 02:06:30.140 --> 02:06:32.820 align:middle line:84% they would like to spend this money on other operations, 02:06:32.820 --> 02:06:34.400 align:middle line:90% such as language services. 02:06:34.400 --> 02:06:36.040 align:middle line:84% I believe overall, this amendment 02:06:36.040 --> 02:06:38.125 align:middle line:84% continues the ongoing effort that the legislature 02:06:38.125 --> 02:06:40.500 align:middle line:84% and the administration have made to modernize government, 02:06:40.500 --> 02:06:42.550 align:middle line:84% streamline our services, and make communication 02:06:42.550 --> 02:06:43.910 align:middle line:90% faster and more efficient. 02:06:43.910 --> 02:06:45.590 align:middle line:84% I hope this amendment is adopted. 02:06:45.590 --> 02:06:48.330 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:06:48.330 --> 02:06:49.680 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:06:49.680 --> 02:06:50.880 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:06:50.880 --> 02:06:51.890 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:06:51.890 --> 02:06:53.590 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 02:06:53.590 --> 02:06:55.950 align:middle line:84% #25 is offered by the senator from Essex and Middlesex, 02:06:55.950 --> 02:06:58.380 align:middle line:84% Mr. Tarr, the title of which the clerk will read. 02:06:58.380 --> 02:07:04.190 align:middle line:84% Amendment #25 by Mr. Tarr, Title V income tax credit reform. 02:07:04.190 --> 02:07:06.930 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, 02:07:06.930 --> 02:07:07.650 align:middle line:90% Mr. O'Connor. 02:07:07.650 --> 02:07:10.150 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I ask that this amendment be temporally held. 02:07:10.150 --> 02:07:11.840 align:middle line:90% The amendment will be held. 02:07:11.840 --> 02:07:13.620 align:middle line:84% We're now on Amendment #26, offered 02:07:13.620 --> 02:07:15.910 align:middle line:84% by the senator from Bristol and Plymouth, 02:07:15.910 --> 02:07:18.480 align:middle line:84% Mr. Rodrigues, the title of which the clerk will read. 02:07:18.480 --> 02:07:23.940 align:middle line:84% Amendment #26 by Mr. Rodrigues, Section 90G 3/4 of Chapter 32. 02:07:23.940 --> 02:07:26.670 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the amendment. 02:07:26.670 --> 02:07:35.069 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor. 02:07:35.069 --> 02:07:36.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:07:36.110 --> 02:07:38.151 align:middle line:84% I'd just like to ask the sponsor of the amendment 02:07:38.151 --> 02:07:40.640 align:middle line:90% for a brief explanation. 02:07:40.640 --> 02:07:44.090 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the senator from Bristol and Plymouth, 02:07:44.090 --> 02:07:45.190 align:middle line:90% Mr. Rodrigues. 02:07:45.190 --> 02:07:47.890 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 02:07:47.890 --> 02:07:51.080 align:middle line:84% I'm happy to provide a brief explanation of what 02:07:51.080 --> 02:07:53.050 align:middle line:90% Amendment #26 does. 02:07:53.050 --> 02:07:56.100 align:middle line:84% This amendment addresses potential concerns 02:07:56.100 --> 02:07:58.820 align:middle line:84% raised about the Age Discrimination 02:07:58.820 --> 02:08:01.150 align:middle line:84% in Employment Act, so-called ADEA, 02:08:01.150 --> 02:08:04.830 align:middle line:84% and removes a potential violation of age discrimination 02:08:04.830 --> 02:08:07.820 align:middle line:84% by allowing all members from age 70 02:08:07.820 --> 02:08:11.410 align:middle line:84% and upwards to continue to participate in the retirement 02:08:11.410 --> 02:08:15.920 align:middle line:84% system under the same conditions as all other employees 02:08:15.920 --> 02:08:19.980 align:middle line:84% for benefit purposes on a pretax basis. 02:08:19.980 --> 02:08:23.030 align:middle line:84% Right now, the election provided to current employees 02:08:23.030 --> 02:08:27.800 align:middle line:84% under Section 90G 3/4 of Chapter 32 results 02:08:27.800 --> 02:08:31.270 align:middle line:84% in the ability of an employee to choose whether or not 02:08:31.270 --> 02:08:33.170 align:middle line:84% to have tax-deferred contributions 02:08:33.170 --> 02:08:36.220 align:middle line:84% made to the employee's retirement system. 02:08:36.220 --> 02:08:38.880 align:middle line:84% This amendment repeals the election provisions 02:08:38.880 --> 02:08:41.260 align:middle line:90% under Section 90G 3/4. 02:08:41.260 --> 02:08:44.250 align:middle line:84% And members who reach age 70 would simply 02:08:44.250 --> 02:08:47.190 align:middle line:84% continue to participate in the retirement system 02:08:47.190 --> 02:08:50.190 align:middle line:84% under the same conditions as all other employees, 02:08:50.190 --> 02:08:54.490 align:middle line:84% and their contributions will remain on a pretax basis. 02:08:54.490 --> 02:08:59.400 align:middle line:84% And this would eliminate the concern 02:08:59.400 --> 02:09:03.850 align:middle line:84% that there would be a problem with age discrimination, 02:09:03.850 --> 02:09:05.779 align:middle line:84% and I hope this amendment is adopted. 02:09:05.779 --> 02:09:07.320 align:middle line:84% --comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:09:07.320 --> 02:09:08.630 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:09:08.630 --> 02:09:09.790 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:09:09.790 --> 02:09:10.740 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:09:10.740 --> 02:09:12.290 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 02:09:12.290 --> 02:09:14.370 align:middle line:84% #27, offered by the same senator, the title 02:09:14.370 --> 02:09:15.640 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:09:15.640 --> 02:09:19.090 align:middle line:84% Amendment #27 by Mr. Rodrigues, single-risk limitations. 02:09:19.090 --> 02:09:21.090 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment, 02:09:21.090 --> 02:09:22.420 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:09:22.420 --> 02:09:23.510 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:09:23.510 --> 02:09:24.380 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:09:24.380 --> 02:09:26.070 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 02:09:26.070 --> 02:09:28.020 align:middle line:90% #28 has been withdrawn. 02:09:28.020 --> 02:09:31.440 align:middle line:84% #29, offered by the senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. 02:09:31.440 --> 02:09:33.450 align:middle line:84% Brady, the title of which the clerk-- 02:09:33.450 --> 02:09:36.430 align:middle line:90% 02:09:36.430 --> 02:09:38.930 align:middle line:84% the chair recognizes the senator from Hampden and Hampshire, 02:09:38.930 --> 02:09:39.510 align:middle line:90% Mr. Lesser. 02:09:39.510 --> 02:09:41.480 align:middle line:84% For what purposes does the gentleman rise? 02:09:41.480 --> 02:09:46.000 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the members. 02:09:46.000 --> 02:09:46.530 align:middle line:90% --objection. 02:09:46.530 --> 02:09:47.670 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:09:47.670 --> 02:09:50.820 align:middle line:84% The senator from Hampden and Hampshire, Mr. Lesser. 02:09:50.820 --> 02:09:51.400 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:09:51.400 --> 02:09:54.040 align:middle line:84% I thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the members. 02:09:54.040 --> 02:09:57.560 align:middle line:84% I rise in support of Amendment #28, the community investment 02:09:57.560 --> 02:09:59.000 align:middle line:90% tax credit. 02:09:59.000 --> 02:10:03.160 align:middle line:84% This tax credit has generated nearly $23 million 02:10:03.160 --> 02:10:05.980 align:middle line:84% in private philanthropic investment 02:10:05.980 --> 02:10:09.100 align:middle line:84% over the past three years alone in our commonwealth. 02:10:09.100 --> 02:10:16.390 align:middle line:84% Just in 2016, these dollars built or preserved 1,195 homes, 02:10:16.390 --> 02:10:24.030 align:middle line:84% created or preserved 3,903 jobs, assisted 717 small businesses, 02:10:24.030 --> 02:10:28.780 align:middle line:90% and served 70,840 families. 02:10:28.780 --> 02:10:31.100 align:middle line:84% The reason this tax credit works so well 02:10:31.100 --> 02:10:35.810 align:middle line:84% is that it entitles donors to a 50% refundable state tax 02:10:35.810 --> 02:10:38.310 align:middle line:84% credit for donating $1,000 or more 02:10:38.310 --> 02:10:41.490 align:middle line:84% to a participating community development corporation. 02:10:41.490 --> 02:10:45.460 align:middle line:84% This tax credit is available to any taxpayer, including 02:10:45.460 --> 02:10:49.340 align:middle line:84% individuals, corporations, and nonprofit organizations. 02:10:49.340 --> 02:10:52.290 align:middle line:84% This tax credit is building up our communities 02:10:52.290 --> 02:10:54.870 align:middle line:84% by injecting funds into organizations 02:10:54.870 --> 02:10:57.760 align:middle line:84% that provide the missing link to resources 02:10:57.760 --> 02:11:00.310 align:middle line:90% our citizens desperately need. 02:11:00.310 --> 02:11:03.020 align:middle line:84% In Jamaica Plain, for example, the Neighborhood Development 02:11:03.020 --> 02:11:05.860 align:middle line:84% Corporation is providing affordable child care 02:11:05.860 --> 02:11:07.910 align:middle line:84% that one parent has said was the best 02:11:07.910 --> 02:11:09.960 align:middle line:90% decision she made for her son. 02:11:09.960 --> 02:11:14.370 align:middle line:84% In Lawrence, Community Works is providing adult ESL classes 02:11:14.370 --> 02:11:16.030 align:middle line:84% so that our immigrant communities 02:11:16.030 --> 02:11:18.560 align:middle line:84% are better prepared to apply for jobs 02:11:18.560 --> 02:11:20.750 align:middle line:90% and pursue higher education. 02:11:20.750 --> 02:11:22.600 align:middle line:84% In Springfield, where this program 02:11:22.600 --> 02:11:25.220 align:middle line:84% is especially important, Way Finders 02:11:25.220 --> 02:11:28.810 align:middle line:84% is forming bonds between [INAUDIBLE],, a retiree 02:11:28.810 --> 02:11:32.300 align:middle line:84% in her 70s, and the young people she has met and mentored 02:11:32.300 --> 02:11:35.900 align:middle line:84% through Let's Play Days at Donna Blake Park. 02:11:35.900 --> 02:11:38.520 align:middle line:84% Throughout Western Mass, organizations 02:11:38.520 --> 02:11:42.140 align:middle line:84% are providing emergency shelter for people like Francisco 02:11:42.140 --> 02:11:44.640 align:middle line:84% and his three-year-old daughter, who needed a place 02:11:44.640 --> 02:11:47.470 align:middle line:84% to stay after he had a workplace accident 02:11:47.470 --> 02:11:50.040 align:middle line:84% and couldn't pay the rent while he recovered. 02:11:50.040 --> 02:11:52.570 align:middle line:84% This is all thanks to this program, 02:11:52.570 --> 02:11:55.400 align:middle line:84% to the community investment tax credit. 02:11:55.400 --> 02:11:57.190 align:middle line:84% All over our commonwealth, people 02:11:57.190 --> 02:11:59.350 align:middle line:84% have access to housing when they need it, 02:11:59.350 --> 02:12:01.680 align:middle line:84% to job training when they most need it, 02:12:01.680 --> 02:12:04.120 align:middle line:84% and to education when they need it. 02:12:04.120 --> 02:12:07.550 align:middle line:84% Most importantly, they have access to their community 02:12:07.550 --> 02:12:10.750 align:middle line:84% and to the organizations that are doing this work closest 02:12:10.750 --> 02:12:12.730 align:middle line:90% to home in their neighborhoods. 02:12:12.730 --> 02:12:15.410 align:middle line:84% As was discussed at the opening of our budget debate, 02:12:15.410 --> 02:12:17.890 align:middle line:84% our theme is lifting all families, 02:12:17.890 --> 02:12:20.450 align:middle line:84% lifting all communities in our commonwealth. 02:12:20.450 --> 02:12:23.510 align:middle line:84% This program, the community investment tax credit, 02:12:23.510 --> 02:12:24.650 align:middle line:90% does just that. 02:12:24.650 --> 02:12:27.420 align:middle line:84% I'm looking forward to this moving through the committee 02:12:27.420 --> 02:12:29.290 align:middle line:84% process with my colleague from Everett, 02:12:29.290 --> 02:12:33.180 align:middle line:84% who filed this legislation, and seeing the successful extension 02:12:33.180 --> 02:12:34.140 align:middle line:90% of this tax credit. 02:12:34.140 --> 02:12:37.040 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:12:37.040 --> 02:12:39.500 align:middle line:90% Mr. President? 02:12:39.500 --> 02:12:40.840 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:12:40.840 --> 02:12:44.910 align:middle line:84% --from Middlesex and Western, Mr. Eldridge. 02:12:44.910 --> 02:12:46.040 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:12:46.040 --> 02:12:50.320 align:middle line:84% I request permission to make a brief statement. 02:12:50.320 --> 02:12:51.340 align:middle line:90% --an objection. 02:12:51.340 --> 02:12:52.880 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:12:52.880 --> 02:12:56.190 align:middle line:90% The senator is recognized. 02:12:56.190 --> 02:12:57.340 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:12:57.340 --> 02:13:00.180 align:middle line:84% I just want to commend the gentleman from Longmeadow 02:13:00.180 --> 02:13:01.850 align:middle line:90% for filing this amendment. 02:13:01.850 --> 02:13:05.790 align:middle line:84% And it really is an important tax credit 02:13:05.790 --> 02:13:09.900 align:middle line:84% that complies with the rules and recommendations 02:13:09.900 --> 02:13:13.270 align:middle line:84% that a previous tax commission had recommended 02:13:13.270 --> 02:13:15.640 align:middle line:90% with clear clawback standards. 02:13:15.640 --> 02:13:18.080 align:middle line:84% And when the gentleman from Everett 02:13:18.080 --> 02:13:22.000 align:middle line:84% filed and helped pass this community investment tax 02:13:22.000 --> 02:13:24.400 align:middle line:84% credit several years ago, we made 02:13:24.400 --> 02:13:26.760 align:middle line:84% sure to comply with those standards. 02:13:26.760 --> 02:13:30.570 align:middle line:84% That's dramatically different from most other corporate tax 02:13:30.570 --> 02:13:31.400 align:middle line:90% credits. 02:13:31.400 --> 02:13:33.380 align:middle line:84% But I also just want to say that I 02:13:33.380 --> 02:13:37.220 align:middle line:84% would agree with the gentleman from Longmeadow's assessment 02:13:37.220 --> 02:13:39.300 align:middle line:90% of the value of the tax credit. 02:13:39.300 --> 02:13:41.570 align:middle line:84% In the district that I represent, 02:13:41.570 --> 02:13:47.170 align:middle line:84% the organization CDC [INAUDIBLE] has expanded its service area 02:13:47.170 --> 02:13:49.115 align:middle line:84% to part of the district I represent, 02:13:49.115 --> 02:13:50.990 align:middle line:84% including the towns of [INAUDIBLE],, Shirley, 02:13:50.990 --> 02:13:52.120 align:middle line:90% and Harvard. 02:13:52.120 --> 02:13:54.680 align:middle line:84% And I've already been familiar with the CDC 02:13:54.680 --> 02:13:57.970 align:middle line:84% due to my work with them before, and they really 02:13:57.970 --> 02:14:01.500 align:middle line:84% do an incredible job at turning around poor neighborhoods 02:14:01.500 --> 02:14:04.400 align:middle line:84% and poor communities, helping create jobs, build 02:14:04.400 --> 02:14:06.990 align:middle line:84% affordable housing, help entrepreneurs-- 02:14:06.990 --> 02:14:09.500 align:middle line:84% often immigrants-- start their own businesses. 02:14:09.500 --> 02:14:11.720 align:middle line:84% So it's a very viable tax credit that I 02:14:11.720 --> 02:14:15.007 align:middle line:84% hope we can extend sometime this session. 02:14:15.007 --> 02:14:17.340 align:middle line:84% But I just want to commend the gentleman from Longmeadow 02:14:17.340 --> 02:14:19.400 align:middle line:84% for filing this, for his advocacy. 02:14:19.400 --> 02:14:22.280 align:middle line:84% And I do hope we can pass this at some point this session. 02:14:22.280 --> 02:14:22.780 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:14:22.780 --> 02:14:26.740 align:middle line:90% 02:14:26.740 --> 02:14:32.800 align:middle line:84% --is Amendment #29, offered by the senator from Plymouth 02:14:32.800 --> 02:14:34.960 align:middle line:84% and Bristol, Mr. Brady, the title of which 02:14:34.960 --> 02:14:35.880 align:middle line:90% the clerk will read. 02:14:35.880 --> 02:14:38.740 align:middle line:84% Amendment #29 by Mr. Brady, equitable support 02:14:38.740 --> 02:14:40.820 align:middle line:90% for enhanced 9-1-1 services. 02:14:40.820 --> 02:14:43.260 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. Brady. 02:14:43.260 --> 02:14:45.640 align:middle line:84% Thank you Mr. President, and through you, to the members. 02:14:45.640 --> 02:14:48.709 align:middle line:84% There is a bill filed on this matter that's going 02:14:48.709 --> 02:14:50.000 align:middle line:90% to be heard in the near future. 02:14:50.000 --> 02:14:53.001 align:middle line:84% So I ask this amendment to be withdrawn. 02:14:53.001 --> 02:14:54.500 align:middle line:84% Requests the amendment be withdrawn. 02:14:54.500 --> 02:14:57.020 align:middle line:84% The gentleman requests that the amendment be withdrawn. 02:14:57.020 --> 02:14:58.110 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 02:14:58.110 --> 02:14:59.610 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:14:59.610 --> 02:15:00.850 align:middle line:90% It is withdrawn. 02:15:00.850 --> 02:15:02.570 align:middle line:84% The same gentleman asks unanimous consent 02:15:02.570 --> 02:15:03.653 align:middle line:90% to make a brief statement. 02:15:03.653 --> 02:15:04.660 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 02:15:04.660 --> 02:15:06.070 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:15:06.070 --> 02:15:08.700 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. Brady. 02:15:08.700 --> 02:15:11.270 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the members, 02:15:11.270 --> 02:15:13.370 align:middle line:84% this amendment that was filed-- and the bill 02:15:13.370 --> 02:15:15.560 align:middle line:84% is going to be heard shortly in the near future-- 02:15:15.560 --> 02:15:18.610 align:middle line:84% would generate $2 million a year from users who have never 02:15:18.610 --> 02:15:20.800 align:middle line:84% shared the cost of the 9-1-1 service, 02:15:20.800 --> 02:15:24.200 align:middle line:84% and adheres to a 2002 mass mandate 02:15:24.200 --> 02:15:27.480 align:middle line:84% that enhanced 9-1-1 will be supported by all customers who 02:15:27.480 --> 02:15:29.740 align:middle line:84% have access to 9-1-1, and it ends 02:15:29.740 --> 02:15:33.490 align:middle line:84% current inequitable situations with the 9-1-1 fee 02:15:33.490 --> 02:15:36.100 align:middle line:84% as paid by wire line, host-paid wireless, 02:15:36.100 --> 02:15:38.680 align:middle line:84% and internet-based voice services users, 02:15:38.680 --> 02:15:41.520 align:middle line:84% while prepaid wireless users pay nothing. 02:15:41.520 --> 02:15:44.910 align:middle line:84% And 40 other states have passed similar legislation. 02:15:44.910 --> 02:15:47.900 align:middle line:84% But I know that there is a hearing scheduled shortly 02:15:47.900 --> 02:15:49.860 align:middle line:90% on this, so thank you for the-- 02:15:49.860 --> 02:15:53.290 align:middle line:90% 02:15:53.290 --> 02:15:56.820 align:middle line:84% --next amendment before is Amendment #30, 02:15:56.820 --> 02:15:59.440 align:middle line:84% offered by the same senator, the title of which the clerk will 02:15:59.440 --> 02:15:59.939 align:middle line:90% read. 02:15:59.939 --> 02:16:02.430 align:middle line:84% Amendment #30, by Mr. Brady, further regulating 02:16:02.430 --> 02:16:05.550 align:middle line:84% temporary inventory adjustments of malt beverages. 02:16:05.550 --> 02:16:07.570 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:16:07.570 --> 02:16:09.030 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:16:09.030 --> 02:16:09.850 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:16:09.850 --> 02:16:10.590 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:16:10.590 --> 02:16:12.130 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 02:16:12.130 --> 02:16:13.720 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr, 02:16:13.720 --> 02:16:16.310 align:middle line:84% offers Amendment #31, the title of which the clerk will read. 02:16:16.310 --> 02:16:19.641 align:middle line:84% Amendment #31 by Mr. Tarr, senior circuit breaker tax 02:16:19.641 --> 02:16:20.140 align:middle line:90% credit. 02:16:20.140 --> 02:16:21.620 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:16:21.620 --> 02:16:22.930 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:16:22.930 --> 02:16:24.060 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:16:24.060 --> 02:16:24.980 align:middle line:90% The Nos have it. 02:16:24.980 --> 02:16:28.710 align:middle line:84% The amendment is not adopted #32 has been withdrawn. 02:16:28.710 --> 02:16:31.660 align:middle line:90% #33 is on hold. 02:16:31.660 --> 02:16:36.740 align:middle line:84% #34 has been withdrawn, as has number #35. 02:16:36.740 --> 02:16:39.260 align:middle line:84% #36, offered by the senator from Norfolk, Bristol, 02:16:39.260 --> 02:16:41.889 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Mr. Ross, the title of which 02:16:41.889 --> 02:16:42.980 align:middle line:90% the clerk will remember. 02:16:42.980 --> 02:16:46.860 align:middle line:84% Amendment #36 by Mr. Ross, encouraging smoking cessation. 02:16:46.860 --> 02:16:50.000 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex, 02:16:50.000 --> 02:16:50.850 align:middle line:90% Mr. Ross. 02:16:50.850 --> 02:16:55.820 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the members. 02:16:55.820 --> 02:16:59.459 align:middle line:90% 02:16:59.459 --> 02:17:01.139 align:middle line:84% I file this amendment with the goal 02:17:01.139 --> 02:17:04.889 align:middle line:84% of increasing tools in our arsenal for reducing the impact 02:17:04.889 --> 02:17:06.600 align:middle line:90% of smoking on the Commonwealth. 02:17:06.600 --> 02:17:08.610 align:middle line:84% We've taken important measures in the Senate 02:17:08.610 --> 02:17:11.900 align:middle line:84% to lower the number of smokers that we have, citizens 02:17:11.900 --> 02:17:16.520 align:middle line:84% with cigarettes to lower the impact of tobacco on our youth. 02:17:16.520 --> 02:17:19.840 align:middle line:84% An action I hope will help further this cause 02:17:19.840 --> 02:17:22.430 align:middle line:84% is to encourage the use the smoking cessation aids, 02:17:22.430 --> 02:17:26.330 align:middle line:84% such as the patch, as an alternative to smoking. 02:17:26.330 --> 02:17:28.850 align:middle line:84% Cessation aids provide valuable assistance 02:17:28.850 --> 02:17:31.510 align:middle line:84% to individuals wishing to eliminate their addiction. 02:17:31.510 --> 02:17:35.080 align:middle line:84% It is my hope that eliminating the sales tax on these products 02:17:35.080 --> 02:17:38.670 align:middle line:84% will encourage more residents to freely use these, 02:17:38.670 --> 02:17:40.990 align:middle line:84% and to get their smoking under control. 02:17:40.990 --> 02:17:44.690 align:middle line:90% I hope this amendment passes. 02:17:44.690 --> 02:17:45.410 align:middle line:90% --the amendment. 02:17:45.410 --> 02:17:47.010 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:17:47.010 --> 02:17:48.180 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:17:48.180 --> 02:17:49.150 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:17:49.150 --> 02:17:50.780 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 02:17:50.780 --> 02:17:53.610 align:middle line:84% #37 is offered by the senator from Worcester and Norfolk, 02:17:53.610 --> 02:17:57.180 align:middle line:84% Mr. Fattman the title of which the clerk will read. 02:17:57.180 --> 02:18:01.040 align:middle line:84% Amendment #37 by Mr. Fattman, singles sales rate factor 02:18:01.040 --> 02:18:02.150 align:middle line:90% analysis. 02:18:02.150 --> 02:18:04.793 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester and Norfolk, Mr. Fattman. 02:18:04.793 --> 02:18:07.209 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you, to the members. 02:18:07.209 --> 02:18:09.600 align:middle line:84% If I had been told we'd be talking 02:18:09.600 --> 02:18:11.760 align:middle line:84% so much about the single sales factor 02:18:11.760 --> 02:18:14.600 align:middle line:84% this early in the budget, I wouldn't have believed it. 02:18:14.600 --> 02:18:18.250 align:middle line:84% But we've heard from the gentleman from Middlesex 02:18:18.250 --> 02:18:20.844 align:middle line:84% and Worcester, the gentleman from the Second Bristol 02:18:20.844 --> 02:18:23.260 align:middle line:84% and Plymouth district-- and if you were listening closely, 02:18:23.260 --> 02:18:24.969 align:middle line:84% you even got some retirement advice, 02:18:24.969 --> 02:18:27.740 align:middle line:84% which as a young millennial, I appreciate. 02:18:27.740 --> 02:18:30.750 align:middle line:84% But this is a dynamic analysis that I'm proposing-- 02:18:30.750 --> 02:18:32.200 align:middle line:90% and actually, re-proposing. 02:18:32.200 --> 02:18:34.830 align:middle line:84% We actually passed this unanimously. 02:18:34.830 --> 02:18:37.410 align:middle line:84% And I think the genesis of the debate that 02:18:37.410 --> 02:18:39.260 align:middle line:84% happened just a few minutes ago is 02:18:39.260 --> 02:18:41.700 align:middle line:84% the reason why we wanted to study and do 02:18:41.700 --> 02:18:42.920 align:middle line:90% a dynamic analysis. 02:18:42.920 --> 02:18:45.440 align:middle line:84% Yes, it is true that a single sales 02:18:45.440 --> 02:18:48.360 align:middle line:84% factor is likely to reduce corporate income tax. 02:18:48.360 --> 02:18:53.080 align:middle line:84% However, the impact that it has on sales tax, personal income 02:18:53.080 --> 02:18:56.080 align:middle line:84% tax, property taxes is something that's unknown. 02:18:56.080 --> 02:18:58.900 align:middle line:84% We heard a $140 million in tax breaks. 02:18:58.900 --> 02:19:02.059 align:middle line:84% However, what we don't know is how payroll taxes went up, 02:19:02.059 --> 02:19:04.930 align:middle line:84% how income taxes went up, how sales taxes went up, 02:19:04.930 --> 02:19:06.459 align:middle line:90% how property taxes went up. 02:19:06.459 --> 02:19:09.680 align:middle line:84% Because without a single sales tax factor, 02:19:09.680 --> 02:19:12.809 align:middle line:84% apportionment is done and a burden on Massachusetts. 02:19:12.809 --> 02:19:14.370 align:middle line:84% So the more employees that you have 02:19:14.370 --> 02:19:19.360 align:middle line:84% in Massachusetts, the more burden of corporate income 02:19:19.360 --> 02:19:20.500 align:middle line:90% taxes are paid. 02:19:20.500 --> 02:19:23.309 align:middle line:84% Therefore, it's a disincentive to bring jobs here 02:19:23.309 --> 02:19:24.469 align:middle line:90% to Massachusetts. 02:19:24.469 --> 02:19:26.780 align:middle line:84% Same thing with your property footprint-- 02:19:26.780 --> 02:19:31.190 align:middle line:84% if there's not a single sales tax factor-- in fact, 02:19:31.190 --> 02:19:34.764 align:middle line:84% you don't have any interest in expanding 02:19:34.764 --> 02:19:36.680 align:middle line:84% your physical footprint here in Massachusetts. 02:19:36.680 --> 02:19:37.180 align:middle line:90% Why? 02:19:37.180 --> 02:19:41.190 align:middle line:84% Because your business income tax burden is greater. 02:19:41.190 --> 02:19:45.080 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, last year, this body adopted this unanimously. 02:19:45.080 --> 02:19:47.889 align:middle line:84% I think, with the challenges that we face in revenue 02:19:47.889 --> 02:19:51.300 align:middle line:84% and looking at and modernizing our tax code, 02:19:51.300 --> 02:19:53.300 align:middle line:84% I think this is appropriate for DOR 02:19:53.300 --> 02:19:55.670 align:middle line:84% to take a dynamic analysis once again. 02:19:55.670 --> 02:19:57.500 align:middle line:84% The Senate supported it last time. 02:19:57.500 --> 02:19:59.220 align:middle line:84% I hope this amendment is adopted, 02:19:59.220 --> 02:20:01.830 align:middle line:84% and I ask for a call of the yeas and nays. 02:20:01.830 --> 02:20:04.340 align:middle line:90% 02:20:04.340 --> 02:20:06.700 align:middle line:90% The gentleman asks-- 02:20:06.700 --> 02:20:39.332 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:20:39.332 --> 02:20:41.790 align:middle line:84% The gentleman asks that when a vote on the matter be taken, 02:20:41.790 --> 02:20:43.760 align:middle line:84% it be taken by a call of the yeas and nays. 02:20:43.760 --> 02:20:45.830 align:middle line:84% Those joining with him rise and be counted. 02:20:45.830 --> 02:20:48.790 align:middle line:84% A sufficient number having risen, if the vote is taken, 02:20:48.790 --> 02:20:50.790 align:middle line:84% it will be taken by a call of the yeas and nays. 02:20:50.790 --> 02:20:51.420 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 02:20:51.420 --> 02:20:54.090 align:middle line:84% The Senate will be in a very brief recess. 02:20:54.090 --> 02:21:00.460 align:middle line:90% 02:21:00.460 --> 02:21:04.560 align:middle line:84% --will be temporarily laid aside. 02:21:04.560 --> 02:21:05.850 align:middle line:90% This is the film tax credit. 02:21:05.850 --> 02:21:08.390 align:middle line:90% 02:21:08.390 --> 02:21:08.990 align:middle line:90% Mr. Leader? 02:21:08.990 --> 02:21:36.490 align:middle line:90% 02:21:36.490 --> 02:21:36.990 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:21:36.990 --> 02:21:38.210 align:middle line:90% --Essex, Mr. Tarr. 02:21:38.210 --> 02:21:39.510 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:21:39.510 --> 02:21:43.390 align:middle line:84% We have had such an interesting discussion of dynamic analysis 02:21:43.390 --> 02:21:46.510 align:middle line:84% that we'd like to ponder the dynamic analysis a little bit 02:21:46.510 --> 02:21:47.150 align:middle line:90% further. 02:21:47.150 --> 02:21:49.160 align:middle line:84% And in order to do that, I move that there 02:21:49.160 --> 02:21:57.170 align:middle line:84% will be a Republican caucus until the hour of 1:30 PM. 02:21:57.170 --> 02:21:59.660 align:middle line:84% Under the rules, a caucus has been granted 02:21:59.660 --> 02:22:01.030 align:middle line:90% until the hour of 1:00 PM. 02:22:01.030 --> 02:22:02.370 align:middle line:90% We will begin promptly-- 02:22:02.370 --> 02:22:04.480 align:middle line:90% 1:30 PM. 02:22:04.480 --> 02:22:08.349 align:middle line:84% EXCUSE ME, PROMPTLY AT 1: 30 PM, with the majority leader 02:22:08.349 --> 02:22:08.890 align:middle line:90% in the chair. 02:22:08.890 --> 02:22:35.260 align:middle line:90% 02:22:35.260 --> 02:22:36.140 align:middle line:90% --now come to order. 02:22:36.140 --> 02:22:39.780 align:middle line:90% The senator from-- 02:22:39.780 --> 02:22:42.490 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex. 02:22:42.490 --> 02:22:43.810 align:middle line:90% For what reason do you rise? 02:22:43.810 --> 02:22:45.310 align:middle line:90% How are you today? 02:22:45.310 --> 02:22:47.920 align:middle line:84% What a great time in Wellesley the other day. 02:22:47.920 --> 02:22:51.810 align:middle line:84% I'm rising to doubt the presence of a forum. 02:22:51.810 --> 02:22:52.310 align:middle line:90% OK. 02:22:52.310 --> 02:22:53.990 align:middle line:90% The Senate doubts a quorom. 02:22:53.990 --> 02:22:56.680 align:middle line:90% Five, six, seven, eight, nine. 02:22:56.680 --> 02:22:59.410 align:middle line:90% A quorum is not present. 02:22:59.410 --> 02:22:59.910 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:22:59.910 --> 02:23:02.409 align:middle line:84% The court officers will call the members and shut the doors. 02:23:02.409 --> 02:23:05.080 align:middle line:84% The court offices will call the members and shut the doors. 02:23:05.080 --> 02:23:43.270 align:middle line:90% 02:23:43.270 --> 02:23:46.364 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:23:46.364 --> 02:23:47.530 align:middle line:90% --returning to the calender. 02:23:47.530 --> 02:23:49.280 align:middle line:90% OK, returning to the calendar. 02:23:49.280 --> 02:23:55.470 align:middle line:84% Amendment #38-- the senator from Bristol and Plymouth 02:23:55.470 --> 02:23:57.280 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:23:57.280 --> 02:23:59.960 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:23:59.960 --> 02:24:05.517 align:middle line:84% Amendment #38 Mr. Rodrigues, film tax credit adjustment. 02:24:05.517 --> 02:24:06.100 align:middle line:90% The question-- 02:24:06.100 --> 02:24:07.620 align:middle line:90% OK, I'm sorry. 02:24:07.620 --> 02:24:10.680 align:middle line:84% I thought Senator [INAUDIBLE] was standing. 02:24:10.680 --> 02:24:30.370 align:middle line:90% 02:24:30.370 --> 02:24:30.870 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:24:30.870 --> 02:24:31.550 align:middle line:90% --Middlesex. 02:24:31.550 --> 02:24:33.110 align:middle line:90% For what do you stand? 02:24:33.110 --> 02:24:35.720 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madame President, and through you, to the members. 02:24:35.720 --> 02:24:37.370 align:middle line:84% How wonderful it is to see that you 02:24:37.370 --> 02:24:39.670 align:middle line:84% have ascended to the rostrum, Madame President. 02:24:39.670 --> 02:24:41.950 align:middle line:84% And you're doing an outstanding job. 02:24:41.950 --> 02:24:44.610 align:middle line:84% Madame president, I'm hoping that we 02:24:44.610 --> 02:24:46.540 align:middle line:84% can have an explanation of the pending 02:24:46.540 --> 02:24:49.330 align:middle line:84% amendments from his sponsor, the good gentleman 02:24:49.330 --> 02:24:51.090 align:middle line:90% from [INAUDIBLE] River. 02:24:51.090 --> 02:24:51.650 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:24:51.650 --> 02:24:55.400 align:middle line:84% The senator from First Middlesex and Plymouth. 02:24:55.400 --> 02:24:55.900 align:middle line:90% Bristol. 02:24:55.900 --> 02:25:00.890 align:middle line:90% 02:25:00.890 --> 02:25:03.170 align:middle line:84% Madame President, we ask for a brief recess. 02:25:03.170 --> 02:25:23.900 align:middle line:90% 02:25:23.900 --> 02:25:41.070 align:middle line:84% --President, and through you, to the members. 02:25:41.070 --> 02:25:45.560 align:middle line:84% Let me take this opportunity to explain what Amendment #38 02:25:45.560 --> 02:25:50.490 align:middle line:84% does, the title of which is a film tax credit adjustment. 02:25:50.490 --> 02:25:53.040 align:middle line:84% And that's exactly what this amendment does. 02:25:53.040 --> 02:25:56.210 align:middle line:84% It makes two very small adjustments 02:25:56.210 --> 02:25:59.780 align:middle line:84% to the Massachusetts film tax credit. 02:25:59.780 --> 02:26:02.700 align:middle line:84% As most of you know, we provide in Massachusetts 02:26:02.700 --> 02:26:09.360 align:middle line:84% a 25% tax credit on qualified expenditures 02:26:09.360 --> 02:26:11.140 align:middle line:90% in the film industry. 02:26:11.140 --> 02:26:14.500 align:middle line:84% And because of this tax credit, we 02:26:14.500 --> 02:26:19.770 align:middle line:84% have seen a great amount of growth in the film industry 02:26:19.770 --> 02:26:23.450 align:middle line:84% here in Massachusetts, whether it is in feature films 02:26:23.450 --> 02:26:28.020 align:middle line:84% or if it's in television or network series. 02:26:28.020 --> 02:26:32.540 align:middle line:84% We've seen investments in [INAUDIBLE],, in studios. 02:26:32.540 --> 02:26:37.060 align:middle line:84% And we're very, very happy with the momentum 02:26:37.060 --> 02:26:40.050 align:middle line:84% that's being built here in Massachusetts in the film 02:26:40.050 --> 02:26:40.690 align:middle line:90% industry. 02:26:40.690 --> 02:26:46.510 align:middle line:84% However, what we have heard from a number of individuals-- 02:26:46.510 --> 02:26:50.240 align:middle line:84% bipartisan, both Democrats and Republicans-- 02:26:50.240 --> 02:26:55.260 align:middle line:84% is the need to maybe make a couple of small adjustments 02:26:55.260 --> 02:27:01.070 align:middle line:84% in the tax credit to ensure that more of the benefit of the tax 02:27:01.070 --> 02:27:05.110 align:middle line:84% credit is realized here in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 02:27:05.110 --> 02:27:09.300 align:middle line:84% by residents and citizens of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 02:27:09.300 --> 02:27:18.220 align:middle line:84% and to ensure that the amount of tax revenue that we are 02:27:18.220 --> 02:27:20.300 align:middle line:84% forfeiting as a result of this credit 02:27:20.300 --> 02:27:25.390 align:middle line:84% is done so more fairly and equitably. 02:27:25.390 --> 02:27:29.520 align:middle line:84% So the two things that this tax credit does is first, 02:27:29.520 --> 02:27:35.340 align:middle line:84% it modifies the eligibility for production expense credits 02:27:35.340 --> 02:27:38.380 align:middle line:84% by raising the in-slate principal 02:27:38.380 --> 02:27:42.860 align:middle line:84% filming days threshold from 50% to 75% 02:27:42.860 --> 02:27:45.410 align:middle line:84% and raising the in-state spending 02:27:45.410 --> 02:27:48.420 align:middle line:90% threshold from 50% to 75%. 02:27:48.420 --> 02:27:52.640 align:middle line:84% So currently, in order to be eligible to receive any tax 02:27:52.640 --> 02:27:57.650 align:middle line:84% credit, you need to either expend 50% of the total film 02:27:57.650 --> 02:28:01.910 align:middle line:84% budget in Massachusetts or film 50% of the number of film days 02:28:01.910 --> 02:28:04.300 align:middle line:84% here in Massachusetts, one or the other. 02:28:04.300 --> 02:28:08.430 align:middle line:84% We are raising that threshold in both instances to 75% 02:28:08.430 --> 02:28:12.880 align:middle line:84% to ensure that Massachusetts' businesses, Massachusetts' 02:28:12.880 --> 02:28:17.560 align:middle line:84% employees get more of the benefit of this text credit. 02:28:17.560 --> 02:28:21.780 align:middle line:84% The second thing that this amendment does, 02:28:21.780 --> 02:28:22.930 align:middle line:90% second section-- 02:28:22.930 --> 02:28:27.570 align:middle line:84% it would exclude any salaries in excess of $1 million 02:28:27.570 --> 02:28:31.220 align:middle line:84% as an eligible production expense. 02:28:31.220 --> 02:28:35.950 align:middle line:84% This change puts an end to Mass payers' taxes 02:28:35.950 --> 02:28:39.840 align:middle line:84% subsidizing 25% of actors' or actresses' or directors' 02:28:39.840 --> 02:28:43.070 align:middle line:90% salaries over $1 million. 02:28:43.070 --> 02:28:45.730 align:middle line:84% We spent a lot of time today this morning 02:28:45.730 --> 02:28:49.670 align:middle line:84% talking about the revenue constraints 02:28:49.670 --> 02:28:52.190 align:middle line:84% that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is in. 02:28:52.190 --> 02:28:55.780 align:middle line:84% This film tax credit is a refundable tax credit, 02:28:55.780 --> 02:28:59.380 align:middle line:84% which means that it acts the same way as a grant would, 02:28:59.380 --> 02:29:01.880 align:middle line:84% that the control of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 02:29:01.880 --> 02:29:04.650 align:middle line:84% after being certified by the Department of Revenue, 02:29:04.650 --> 02:29:08.700 align:middle line:84% cuts a check, writes a check to the qualified eligible 02:29:08.700 --> 02:29:10.830 align:middle line:90% recipients. 02:29:10.830 --> 02:29:14.150 align:middle line:84% And it's estimated that by making these two 02:29:14.150 --> 02:29:17.870 align:middle line:84% very small adjustments in the Massachusetts film tax credit 02:29:17.870 --> 02:29:21.840 align:middle line:84% program, we would save $14 to $15 million 02:29:21.840 --> 02:29:24.280 align:middle line:84% annually here in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 02:29:24.280 --> 02:29:27.210 align:middle line:84% Madame President, I hope this amendment is adopted. 02:29:27.210 --> 02:29:27.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:29:27.850 --> 02:29:31.014 align:middle line:84% The senator from First Essex and Middlesex. 02:29:31.014 --> 02:29:32.180 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madame President. 02:29:32.180 --> 02:29:34.010 align:middle line:84% I appreciate the gentleman's explanation. 02:29:34.010 --> 02:29:36.130 align:middle line:84% And the gentleman, at the close of his comments, 02:29:36.130 --> 02:29:39.080 align:middle line:84% indicated that by enacting this amendment-- 02:29:39.080 --> 02:29:40.620 align:middle line:84% and if it were to become law-- we 02:29:40.620 --> 02:29:45.060 align:middle line:84% would regain somewhere in the neighborhood of $14 million. 02:29:45.060 --> 02:29:46.200 align:middle line:90% But Mr. President-- 02:29:46.200 --> 02:29:48.520 align:middle line:90% Madame President, I'm sorry-- 02:29:48.520 --> 02:29:50.330 align:middle line:84% it's not clear that that would be the case. 02:29:50.330 --> 02:29:51.913 align:middle line:84% In fact, it could actually be the case 02:29:51.913 --> 02:29:53.920 align:middle line:84% that we would lose much more than that if we 02:29:53.920 --> 02:29:57.910 align:middle line:84% were to begin losing production companies in Massachusetts that 02:29:57.910 --> 02:30:00.670 align:middle line:84% have had a tremendous benefit in this commonwealth 02:30:00.670 --> 02:30:04.250 align:middle line:84% as a result, largely, of this text credit being in place. 02:30:04.250 --> 02:30:07.580 align:middle line:84% And how big is that impact, Madame President? 02:30:07.580 --> 02:30:10.950 align:middle line:84% Well, since the tax credit became law, 02:30:10.950 --> 02:30:16.930 align:middle line:84% 170 productions have filmed in 190 cities and towns. 02:30:16.930 --> 02:30:20.190 align:middle line:84% And television alone, Madame President, 02:30:20.190 --> 02:30:25.420 align:middle line:84% has seen about 33 cities and towns see production 02:30:25.420 --> 02:30:28.251 align:middle line:84% as a result, largely, of the tax credit. 02:30:28.251 --> 02:30:30.000 align:middle line:84% Madame President, we talked a little while 02:30:30.000 --> 02:30:32.260 align:middle line:84% ago about the need to have jobs that 02:30:32.260 --> 02:30:34.510 align:middle line:84% pay good wages to be able to address 02:30:34.510 --> 02:30:37.860 align:middle line:84% our current underperformance of revenue collections. 02:30:37.860 --> 02:30:42.490 align:middle line:84% And in fact, Madame President, from 2006 to 2014, 02:30:42.490 --> 02:30:46.920 align:middle line:84% over 14,500 of those jobs were created 02:30:46.920 --> 02:30:51.440 align:middle line:84% by the industry that responds to this particular tax credit. 02:30:51.440 --> 02:30:53.510 align:middle line:84% And interestingly enough, Madame President, 02:30:53.510 --> 02:31:00.270 align:middle line:84% the average salary of those jobs was $70,000, or $67,000. 02:31:00.270 --> 02:31:01.060 align:middle line:90% I'm sorry. 02:31:01.060 --> 02:31:05.450 align:middle line:84% And 70% of them went to Massachusetts residents. 02:31:05.450 --> 02:31:09.520 align:middle line:84% Clearly, Madame President, this is a tax credit 02:31:09.520 --> 02:31:12.720 align:middle line:84% that is working as it is currently constructed 02:31:12.720 --> 02:31:15.730 align:middle line:90% and for its intended purpose. 02:31:15.730 --> 02:31:18.750 align:middle line:84% Interestingly enough in addition to that, Madame President, 02:31:18.750 --> 02:31:22.130 align:middle line:84% companies have been created in the Commonwealth 02:31:22.130 --> 02:31:24.690 align:middle line:84% to be able to respond to the demand 02:31:24.690 --> 02:31:26.590 align:middle line:90% of this particular industry. 02:31:26.590 --> 02:31:30.100 align:middle line:84% More than 50 high-tech post-production 02:31:30.100 --> 02:31:33.100 align:middle line:84% and visual effects companies have been created, 02:31:33.100 --> 02:31:38.820 align:middle line:84% and they employ over 550 highly skilled workers. 02:31:38.820 --> 02:31:42.110 align:middle line:84% And in order to accommodate those businesses, Madame 02:31:42.110 --> 02:31:45.550 align:middle line:84% President, more than two dozen colleges and universities 02:31:45.550 --> 02:31:48.100 align:middle line:84% have developed academic programming 02:31:48.100 --> 02:31:50.770 align:middle line:84% to support jobs in this industry. 02:31:50.770 --> 02:31:54.470 align:middle line:84% And currently, there are 4,000 film and media students 02:31:54.470 --> 02:31:58.950 align:middle line:84% that can seek a career path and move forward into the industry 02:31:58.950 --> 02:32:00.870 align:middle line:90% as it continues to grow. 02:32:00.870 --> 02:32:03.800 align:middle line:84% Madame President, we already have in this budget 02:32:03.800 --> 02:32:08.250 align:middle line:84% a commission to study all these types of tax credits and tax 02:32:08.250 --> 02:32:10.530 align:middle line:84% expenditures, as they are called. 02:32:10.530 --> 02:32:13.910 align:middle line:84% It is curious that this one is being singled out 02:32:13.910 --> 02:32:16.630 align:middle line:84% without the kind of analysis that the others will have. 02:32:16.630 --> 02:32:18.920 align:middle line:84% Madame President, we should not act 02:32:18.920 --> 02:32:23.350 align:middle line:84% on something that has been so productive and so effective. 02:32:23.350 --> 02:32:28.050 align:middle line:84% It is not broken, and we do not, therefore, Madame President, 02:32:28.050 --> 02:32:29.380 align:middle line:90% need to fix it. 02:32:29.380 --> 02:32:31.250 align:middle line:84% And I move, Madame President, that when 02:32:31.250 --> 02:32:35.760 align:middle line:84% a vote is taken in this matter, it be taken by a standing vote. 02:32:35.760 --> 02:32:36.490 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:32:36.490 --> 02:32:38.340 align:middle line:84% The gentleman moves that the vote 02:32:38.340 --> 02:32:40.440 align:middle line:90% be taken by a standing vote. 02:32:40.440 --> 02:32:42.650 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of-- 02:32:42.650 --> 02:32:43.380 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:32:43.380 --> 02:32:45.210 align:middle line:90% I was getting there. 02:32:45.210 --> 02:32:45.780 align:middle line:90% [CHUCKLES] 02:32:45.780 --> 02:32:49.295 align:middle line:84% All those in favor of the amendment rise and be counted. 02:32:49.295 --> 02:32:58.680 align:middle line:90% 02:32:58.680 --> 02:32:59.180 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:32:59.180 --> 02:33:16.520 align:middle line:90% The clerk will-- 02:33:16.520 --> 02:33:17.690 align:middle line:90% Please be seated. 02:33:17.690 --> 02:33:18.536 align:middle line:90% Please be seated. 02:33:18.536 --> 02:33:19.660 align:middle line:90% Those opposed, please rise. 02:33:19.660 --> 02:33:21.380 align:middle line:90% Those opposed, please rise. 02:33:21.380 --> 02:33:29.670 align:middle line:90% 02:33:29.670 --> 02:33:30.950 align:middle line:90% 23 in the affirmative. 02:33:30.950 --> 02:33:32.150 align:middle line:90% Nine in the negative. 02:33:32.150 --> 02:33:33.910 align:middle line:90% 23 in the affirmative. 02:33:33.910 --> 02:33:35.060 align:middle line:90% Nine in the negative. 02:33:35.060 --> 02:33:36.610 align:middle line:90% The amendment passes. 02:33:36.610 --> 02:33:39.120 align:middle line:90% Amendment is adopted. 02:33:39.120 --> 02:33:43.740 align:middle line:84% Amendment #39, offered by the senator 02:33:43.740 --> 02:33:46.480 align:middle line:90% from Bristol and Plymouth. 02:33:46.480 --> 02:33:49.110 align:middle line:90% And the clerk will call the-- 02:33:49.110 --> 02:33:52.850 align:middle line:84% Amendment #39 but Mr. Montigny, promoting safe and appropriate 02:33:52.850 --> 02:33:56.850 align:middle line:84% access to prescription medications. 02:33:56.850 --> 02:33:58.930 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:33:58.930 --> 02:34:00.590 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:34:00.590 --> 02:34:02.140 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:34:02.140 --> 02:34:08.550 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 02:34:08.550 --> 02:34:09.740 align:middle line:90% Amendment #40-- 02:34:09.740 --> 02:34:10.240 align:middle line:90% Is on hold. 02:34:10.240 --> 02:34:12.600 align:middle line:90% --is on hold. 02:34:12.600 --> 02:34:18.680 align:middle line:84% Amendment #41-- the senator from Bristol and Plymouth 02:34:18.680 --> 02:34:20.770 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:34:20.770 --> 02:34:22.010 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:34:22.010 --> 02:34:25.050 align:middle line:84% Amendment #41 by Mr. Montigny, protecting consumers 02:34:25.050 --> 02:34:28.190 align:middle line:84% through an update to Betty's law. 02:34:28.190 --> 02:34:30.299 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:34:30.299 --> 02:34:31.840 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex. 02:34:31.840 --> 02:34:32.580 align:middle line:90% Oh, I'm sorry. 02:34:32.580 --> 02:34:34.864 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex. 02:34:34.864 --> 02:34:36.030 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madame President. 02:34:36.030 --> 02:34:39.630 align:middle line:84% How refreshing it was to hear from the gentleman from New 02:34:39.630 --> 02:34:42.920 align:middle line:84% Bedford earlier in this debate, with his robust comments. 02:34:42.920 --> 02:34:46.600 align:middle line:84% Madame President, he whet our appetite for more of the same. 02:34:46.600 --> 02:34:48.080 align:middle line:84% And so I'm hoping that we can have 02:34:48.080 --> 02:34:51.320 align:middle line:84% an explanation of Amendment #41 as it currently 02:34:51.320 --> 02:34:54.370 align:middle line:90% pends before the senate. 02:34:54.370 --> 02:34:59.230 align:middle line:84% The minority leadership be careful what he wishes for. 02:34:59.230 --> 02:35:03.230 align:middle line:84% The last time that I took to this microphone, 02:35:03.230 --> 02:35:06.200 align:middle line:84% he seemed to imply that I droned on and on. 02:35:06.200 --> 02:35:08.740 align:middle line:84% So he's given me another opportunity. 02:35:08.740 --> 02:35:11.250 align:middle line:84% I would have been happy to retain my seat, 02:35:11.250 --> 02:35:16.180 align:middle line:84% but I am excited to share my thoughts on this. 02:35:16.180 --> 02:35:18.290 align:middle line:84% So it's only coincidental, of course, 02:35:18.290 --> 02:35:20.270 align:middle line:84% that it appears that the first two issues 02:35:20.270 --> 02:35:23.720 align:middle line:84% that I've had to speak to, I look at it as the Senate-- 02:35:23.720 --> 02:35:27.650 align:middle line:84% or a good majority of us in both parties-- 02:35:27.650 --> 02:35:31.940 align:middle line:84% acting, in a sense, as the watchdog against some 02:35:31.940 --> 02:35:35.502 align:middle line:84% of the unfortunate damage done by special interests 02:35:35.502 --> 02:35:36.210 align:middle line:90% in this building. 02:35:36.210 --> 02:35:39.290 align:middle line:84% So if you remember in the budget two years ago, 02:35:39.290 --> 02:35:41.510 align:middle line:90% we closed a very-- 02:35:41.510 --> 02:35:44.400 align:middle line:84% excuse me, we passed a very important amendment that, 02:35:44.400 --> 02:35:45.410 align:middle line:90% surprisingly-- 02:35:45.410 --> 02:35:48.200 align:middle line:84% because anybody who's been here longer than 02:35:48.200 --> 02:35:52.160 align:middle line:84% a day knows the power of the insurance industry, 02:35:52.160 --> 02:35:54.780 align:middle line:84% not just here in Massachusetts but across the country, 02:35:54.780 --> 02:36:00.900 align:middle line:84% in terms of passing legislation, challenging important consumer 02:36:00.900 --> 02:36:03.490 align:middle line:84% provisions in the court of law-- again, 02:36:03.490 --> 02:36:07.050 align:middle line:84% not simply in capital cities, but primarily in Washington. 02:36:07.050 --> 02:36:13.310 align:middle line:84% So from time to time, it is, I think, something to celebrate 02:36:13.310 --> 02:36:16.270 align:middle line:84% when the Senate, as is usually the case, 02:36:16.270 --> 02:36:18.930 align:middle line:84% takes the lead on a pro-consumer issue. 02:36:18.930 --> 02:36:21.160 align:middle line:84% And if you remember what the issue was, 02:36:21.160 --> 02:36:22.370 align:middle line:90% we had been hearing-- 02:36:22.370 --> 02:36:24.900 align:middle line:84% and I didn't realize at the time just how prevalent it was. 02:36:24.900 --> 02:36:29.220 align:middle line:84% I had had some examples in my own district, 02:36:29.220 --> 02:36:32.980 align:middle line:84% and also had agents representing consumers 02:36:32.980 --> 02:36:36.510 align:middle line:84% calling and talking about what is, in essence, an outrage. 02:36:36.510 --> 02:36:39.080 align:middle line:84% And I think when I remind people of the law 02:36:39.080 --> 02:36:42.150 align:middle line:84% and then tell you quickly how this closes a loophole, 02:36:42.150 --> 02:36:43.490 align:middle line:90% you'll agree. 02:36:43.490 --> 02:36:45.640 align:middle line:90% So a minor accident-- 02:36:45.640 --> 02:36:47.850 align:middle line:84% if you are in a minor accident, up 02:36:47.850 --> 02:36:51.420 align:middle line:84% to $500 under the law that predates 02:36:51.420 --> 02:36:53.600 align:middle line:84% the passage of the underlying law, 02:36:53.600 --> 02:36:55.980 align:middle line:84% you will be surcharged three points. 02:36:55.980 --> 02:36:59.800 align:middle line:84% And by the way, until 2008, all companies 02:36:59.800 --> 02:37:02.850 align:middle line:84% would go through the SDIP, the safe driver insurance plan. 02:37:02.850 --> 02:37:04.300 align:middle line:90% And then under deregulation-- 02:37:04.300 --> 02:37:06.460 align:middle line:84% I won't get into all the funny business that 02:37:06.460 --> 02:37:09.640 align:middle line:84% can be done in terms of redlining and discrimination 02:37:09.640 --> 02:37:12.260 align:middle line:84% of the consumer based on geography, 02:37:12.260 --> 02:37:13.680 align:middle line:84% based on a bunch of other things. 02:37:13.680 --> 02:37:17.560 align:middle line:84% Very simply, after many, many, many years 02:37:17.560 --> 02:37:20.290 align:middle line:84% of holding that threshold at $500 02:37:20.290 --> 02:37:23.610 align:middle line:84% and the insurance industry battling any change, 02:37:23.610 --> 02:37:25.530 align:middle line:90% finally the consumer said-- 02:37:25.530 --> 02:37:26.670 align:middle line:90% and think about this. 02:37:26.670 --> 02:37:30.860 align:middle line:84% If you have been to an auto body shop in the last 10 years, 02:37:30.860 --> 02:37:34.210 align:middle line:84% you know that even a scratch on a bumper 02:37:34.210 --> 02:37:36.020 align:middle line:84% is going to cost you more than that. 02:37:36.020 --> 02:37:38.207 align:middle line:84% Many people now have the-- they're not 02:37:38.207 --> 02:37:40.790 align:middle line:84% the old metal bumpers where you could leave the scratch there. 02:37:40.790 --> 02:37:42.039 align:middle line:90% You replaced the whole bumper. 02:37:42.039 --> 02:37:42.890 align:middle line:90% Madame President? 02:37:42.890 --> 02:37:43.780 align:middle line:90% Yes? 02:37:43.780 --> 02:37:45.980 align:middle line:84% I'm having difficulty hearing the gentleman. 02:37:45.980 --> 02:37:46.480 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:37:46.480 --> 02:37:49.710 align:middle line:84% The senator has asked, and she has difficulty hearing. 02:37:49.710 --> 02:37:52.430 align:middle line:84% So if you have conversations, please take them 02:37:52.430 --> 02:37:53.944 align:middle line:90% outside the rail. 02:37:53.944 --> 02:37:55.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madame President. 02:37:55.110 --> 02:37:58.596 align:middle line:84% I appreciate my colleague being so interested in what 02:37:58.596 --> 02:37:59.970 align:middle line:84% I had to say, because once again, 02:37:59.970 --> 02:38:02.270 align:middle line:84% I was having trouble hearing myself speak. 02:38:02.270 --> 02:38:04.840 align:middle line:84% And then you start to lose your train of thought. 02:38:04.840 --> 02:38:08.410 align:middle line:84% So this is a great benefit, to have my colleagues stand 02:38:08.410 --> 02:38:13.400 align:middle line:84% and defend my rights to speak on behalf of the consumer. 02:38:13.400 --> 02:38:15.410 align:middle line:84% So Madame President, the threshold-- 02:38:15.410 --> 02:38:17.820 align:middle line:90% $500-- has now been increased. 02:38:17.820 --> 02:38:20.080 align:middle line:90% Current law is now $1,000-- 02:38:20.080 --> 02:38:23.240 align:middle line:84% which, if you represent anyone who 02:38:23.240 --> 02:38:25.940 align:middle line:84% struggles to pay their bills and struggles to pay their auto 02:38:25.940 --> 02:38:29.230 align:middle line:84% insurance, you know that under the old law, 02:38:29.230 --> 02:38:31.740 align:middle line:84% it was a real burden, mainly on people 02:38:31.740 --> 02:38:35.510 align:middle line:84% that were struggling already to pay their insurance bill. 02:38:35.510 --> 02:38:37.400 align:middle line:84% Major accidents, the threshold used 02:38:37.400 --> 02:38:38.900 align:middle line:84% to be anything over $2,000, where 02:38:38.900 --> 02:38:42.600 align:middle line:84% you get four points on your driving record surcharges. 02:38:42.600 --> 02:38:43.910 align:middle line:90% That's now $5,000. 02:38:43.910 --> 02:38:45.990 align:middle line:84% So great news-- and we all celebrated it. 02:38:45.990 --> 02:38:47.730 align:middle line:84% It actually was a really good news day 02:38:47.730 --> 02:38:50.060 align:middle line:84% when we could beat the insurance industry on behalf 02:38:50.060 --> 02:38:52.110 align:middle line:90% of the small business agents-- 02:38:52.110 --> 02:38:55.290 align:middle line:84% but really, more than that, on behalf of the consumer who 02:38:55.290 --> 02:38:56.760 align:middle line:90% was complaining to those agents. 02:38:56.760 --> 02:38:58.550 align:middle line:90% So the law is signed. 02:38:58.550 --> 02:39:02.466 align:middle line:84% The governor even took a picture and sent it to me signing it, 02:39:02.466 --> 02:39:04.340 align:middle line:84% because I think he was so strongly in support 02:39:04.340 --> 02:39:05.670 align:middle line:90% of it also, Madame President. 02:39:05.670 --> 02:39:08.582 align:middle line:84% And then, wouldn't you know-- it's like playing whack-a-mole 02:39:08.582 --> 02:39:09.790 align:middle line:90% with the insurance industry-- 02:39:09.790 --> 02:39:11.840 align:middle line:84% they'll find a loophole, even if they 02:39:11.840 --> 02:39:14.110 align:middle line:84% have to create the loophole on their own. 02:39:14.110 --> 02:39:17.220 align:middle line:84% And in fact, their argument in the front page Globe story that 02:39:17.220 --> 02:39:18.810 align:middle line:90% said, hey, this is the law. 02:39:18.810 --> 02:39:20.050 align:middle line:90% Why aren't you conforming? 02:39:20.050 --> 02:39:24.230 align:middle line:84% Was that our law that we passed was ambiguous. 02:39:24.230 --> 02:39:27.570 align:middle line:84% So we expect that they will now celebrate this amendment, 02:39:27.570 --> 02:39:29.540 align:middle line:84% because we're taking away any ambiguity 02:39:29.540 --> 02:39:32.670 align:middle line:84% and we are saying that every consumer should 02:39:32.670 --> 02:39:33.720 align:middle line:90% be treated the same-- 02:39:33.720 --> 02:39:35.770 align:middle line:90% that if you are Liberty Mutual-- 02:39:35.770 --> 02:39:38.420 align:middle line:84% real stories-- if you are Progressive, 02:39:38.420 --> 02:39:40.440 align:middle line:84% if you are All State, if you are Geico-- 02:39:40.440 --> 02:39:42.480 align:middle line:84% all of the abusers that have been 02:39:42.480 --> 02:39:45.290 align:middle line:84% taking advantage of the consumer and flouting the law, 02:39:45.290 --> 02:39:46.710 align:middle line:90% now will have to conform. 02:39:46.710 --> 02:39:48.700 align:middle line:84% So all this does is closed a loophole 02:39:48.700 --> 02:39:51.620 align:middle line:84% and updated the law to say one simple thing. 02:39:51.620 --> 02:39:54.960 align:middle line:84% The law says a minor accident is anything under $1,000. 02:39:54.960 --> 02:39:56.460 align:middle line:84% You will not surcharge the consumer. 02:39:56.460 --> 02:39:57.460 align:middle line:84% So here's what they've been doing. 02:39:57.460 --> 02:39:59.770 align:middle line:84% And I'll close with this, because I don't use words 02:39:59.770 --> 02:40:01.920 align:middle line:90% like "outrage" lightly. 02:40:01.920 --> 02:40:05.370 align:middle line:84% They have been sending out notices for a surcharge 02:40:05.370 --> 02:40:09.944 align:middle line:84% to somebody who has a $500 accident, for instance. 02:40:09.944 --> 02:40:11.110 align:middle line:90% They're under the state law. 02:40:11.110 --> 02:40:12.510 align:middle line:90% We debated this. 02:40:12.510 --> 02:40:13.650 align:middle line:90% It's been signed. 02:40:13.650 --> 02:40:14.620 align:middle line:90% It's law. 02:40:14.620 --> 02:40:16.510 align:middle line:90% They're sending out a surcharge. 02:40:16.510 --> 02:40:18.110 align:middle line:84% If the consumer pays it-- which many 02:40:18.110 --> 02:40:20.460 align:middle line:84% do, because they can't take a day off for an appeal, 02:40:20.460 --> 02:40:24.280 align:middle line:84% or they can't afford the chance that they'll pay the $50 fee 02:40:24.280 --> 02:40:26.910 align:middle line:84% and then be turned down, because most consumers feel 02:40:26.910 --> 02:40:28.940 align:middle line:84% they're not going to get a fair shake, frankly, 02:40:28.940 --> 02:40:30.280 align:middle line:90% by their government. 02:40:30.280 --> 02:40:31.810 align:middle line:90% So guess what happens? 02:40:31.810 --> 02:40:35.590 align:middle line:84% In every case, the consumer is winning the appeal. 02:40:35.590 --> 02:40:39.132 align:middle line:84% If you ever needed to know that this law is standing 02:40:39.132 --> 02:40:41.340 align:middle line:84% and the insurance industry is taking advantage of it, 02:40:41.340 --> 02:40:42.680 align:middle line:90% the proof is right there. 02:40:42.680 --> 02:40:45.870 align:middle line:84% A consumer conforming to the law should not 02:40:45.870 --> 02:40:48.700 align:middle line:84% have to pay for an appeal, take a day off from work, 02:40:48.700 --> 02:40:53.010 align:middle line:84% and then go in and win anyway so the insurance industry can turn 02:40:53.010 --> 02:40:54.590 align:middle line:90% its nose up at an existing law. 02:40:54.590 --> 02:40:55.740 align:middle line:90% It's incredible. 02:40:55.740 --> 02:40:58.110 align:middle line:84% I've seen plenty around here by this industry. 02:40:58.110 --> 02:41:00.840 align:middle line:84% This one caught me by surprise, because I thought 02:41:00.840 --> 02:41:03.220 align:middle line:84% once you had a debate in here and you 02:41:03.220 --> 02:41:06.020 align:middle line:84% win on the merits, which we did, and then you win in a tough-- 02:41:06.020 --> 02:41:09.160 align:middle line:84% a conference is tough on policy matters. 02:41:09.160 --> 02:41:12.290 align:middle line:84% It's not an easy thing for Ways and Means chair and conferees. 02:41:12.290 --> 02:41:13.330 align:middle line:90% And we won it. 02:41:13.330 --> 02:41:16.180 align:middle line:84% This simply says that's the law, and now it 02:41:16.180 --> 02:41:18.730 align:middle line:84% applies to all auto insurers, not just 02:41:18.730 --> 02:41:21.310 align:middle line:84% those that choose to use the merit rating board 02:41:21.310 --> 02:41:22.700 align:middle line:90% and go through the SDIP plan. 02:41:22.700 --> 02:41:25.830 align:middle line:84% Again, many of them go through their own plan 02:41:25.830 --> 02:41:26.734 align:middle line:90% under deregulation. 02:41:26.734 --> 02:41:27.900 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madame President. 02:41:27.900 --> 02:41:29.500 align:middle line:84% And thank you for the question to the minority leader. 02:41:29.500 --> 02:41:30.160 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:41:30.160 --> 02:41:32.810 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:41:32.810 --> 02:41:34.290 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:41:34.290 --> 02:41:34.920 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:41:34.920 --> 02:41:37.240 align:middle line:90% 02:41:37.240 --> 02:41:37.740 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:41:37.740 --> 02:41:39.198 align:middle line:84% I asked that when a call was taken, 02:41:39.198 --> 02:41:43.140 align:middle line:84% it be taken by call of the yeas and nays. 02:41:43.140 --> 02:41:46.890 align:middle line:84% The senator from Bristol asks that when a vote is taken, 02:41:46.890 --> 02:41:48.930 align:middle line:84% it be taken by a call of the yeas and nays. 02:41:48.930 --> 02:41:52.204 align:middle line:84% Those members joining with him, please rise and be counted. 02:41:52.204 --> 02:41:53.370 align:middle line:90% A sufficient number, Madame. 02:41:53.370 --> 02:41:56.670 align:middle line:84% A sufficient number of members are present, 02:41:56.670 --> 02:41:59.800 align:middle line:84% have risen, and the yeas and nays will be ordered. 02:41:59.800 --> 02:42:01.550 align:middle line:84% And the clerk will call the role. 02:42:01.550 --> 02:42:21.680 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madame President. 02:42:21.680 --> 02:42:25.080 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:42:25.080 --> 02:42:25.580 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:42:25.580 --> 02:42:25.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:25.710 --> 02:42:26.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:26.210 --> 02:42:28.770 align:middle line:90% 02:42:28.770 --> 02:42:29.870 align:middle line:90% Joseph A. Boncore? 02:42:29.870 --> 02:42:30.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:30.690 --> 02:42:31.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:31.690 --> 02:42:33.680 align:middle line:90% Michael D. Brady? 02:42:33.680 --> 02:42:34.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:34.180 --> 02:42:34.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:34.980 --> 02:42:36.670 align:middle line:90% William N. Brownsberger? 02:42:36.670 --> 02:42:44.000 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:42:44.000 --> 02:42:44.930 align:middle line:90% Harriette L. Chandler? 02:42:44.930 --> 02:42:50.990 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:42:50.990 --> 02:42:52.160 align:middle line:90% Sonya Chang-Diaz? 02:42:52.160 --> 02:42:52.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:52.760 --> 02:42:53.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:53.870 --> 02:42:55.951 align:middle line:90% Cynthia Stone Creem? 02:42:55.951 --> 02:42:56.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:56.450 --> 02:42:57.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:57.690 --> 02:42:59.130 align:middle line:90% Julian Cyr? 02:42:59.130 --> 02:42:59.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:59.990 --> 02:43:00.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:00.990 --> 02:43:03.581 align:middle line:90% Viriato M. DeMacedo? 02:43:03.581 --> 02:43:04.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:04.080 --> 02:43:04.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:04.620 --> 02:43:06.930 align:middle line:90% Sal DiDomenico? 02:43:06.930 --> 02:43:07.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:07.430 --> 02:43:07.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:07.980 --> 02:43:10.081 align:middle line:90% Eileen M. Donahue? 02:43:10.081 --> 02:43:10.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:10.580 --> 02:43:11.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:11.380 --> 02:43:13.840 align:middle line:90% James B. Aldridge? 02:43:13.840 --> 02:43:14.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:14.340 --> 02:43:15.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:15.190 --> 02:43:16.360 align:middle line:90% Ryan. 02:43:16.360 --> 02:43:17.471 align:middle line:90% C. Fattman? 02:43:17.471 --> 02:43:17.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:17.970 --> 02:43:18.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:18.580 --> 02:43:20.811 align:middle line:90% Jennifer L. Flanagan? 02:43:20.811 --> 02:43:21.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:21.310 --> 02:43:22.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:22.020 --> 02:43:24.500 align:middle line:90% Linda Dorcena Forry? 02:43:24.500 --> 02:43:25.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:25.570 --> 02:43:26.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:26.070 --> 02:43:26.760 align:middle line:90% Anne M. Gobi? 02:43:26.760 --> 02:43:27.259 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:27.259 --> 02:43:28.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:28.360 --> 02:43:30.260 align:middle line:90% Adam G. Hinds? 02:43:30.260 --> 02:43:30.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:30.760 --> 02:43:31.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:31.810 --> 02:43:34.020 align:middle line:90% Donald F. Humason, Jr.? 02:43:34.020 --> 02:43:34.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:34.690 --> 02:43:35.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:35.510 --> 02:43:37.670 align:middle line:90% Patricia D. Jehlen? 02:43:37.670 --> 02:43:38.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:38.170 --> 02:43:39.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:39.050 --> 02:43:40.820 align:middle line:90% John F. Keenan? 02:43:40.820 --> 02:43:41.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:41.540 --> 02:43:42.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:42.700 --> 02:43:44.580 align:middle line:90% Eric P. Lesser? 02:43:44.580 --> 02:43:45.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:45.080 --> 02:43:45.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:45.970 --> 02:43:48.371 align:middle line:90% Jason M. Lewis. 02:43:48.371 --> 02:43:48.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:48.870 --> 02:43:49.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:49.430 --> 02:43:50.960 align:middle line:90% Barbara A. L'Italien. 02:43:50.960 --> 02:43:51.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:51.830 --> 02:43:52.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:52.810 --> 02:43:54.410 align:middle line:90% Joan B. Lovely. 02:43:54.410 --> 02:43:55.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:55.150 --> 02:43:56.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:56.130 --> 02:43:58.080 align:middle line:90% Thomas M. McGee. 02:43:58.080 --> 02:43:58.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:58.580 --> 02:43:59.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:59.840 --> 02:44:02.200 align:middle line:90% Mark C. Montigny. 02:44:02.200 --> 02:44:02.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:02.730 --> 02:44:03.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:03.620 --> 02:44:05.640 align:middle line:90% Michael O. Moore. 02:44:05.640 --> 02:44:06.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:06.140 --> 02:44:07.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:07.060 --> 02:44:09.010 align:middle line:90% Patrick M. O'Connor. 02:44:09.010 --> 02:44:09.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:09.510 --> 02:44:10.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:10.350 --> 02:44:12.720 align:middle line:90% Kathleen O'Connor Ives. 02:44:12.720 --> 02:44:13.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:13.220 --> 02:44:13.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:13.840 --> 02:44:15.940 align:middle line:90% Mark R. Pacheco. 02:44:15.940 --> 02:44:16.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:16.560 --> 02:44:17.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:17.530 --> 02:44:19.350 align:middle line:90% Michael J. Rodrigues. 02:44:19.350 --> 02:44:19.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:19.890 --> 02:44:21.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:21.220 --> 02:44:23.970 align:middle line:90% Richard J. Ross. 02:44:23.970 --> 02:44:24.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:24.470 --> 02:44:24.969 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:24.969 --> 02:44:26.400 align:middle line:90% Michael F. Rush. 02:44:26.400 --> 02:44:26.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:26.900 --> 02:44:27.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:27.720 --> 02:44:29.650 align:middle line:90% Karen E. Spilka. 02:44:29.650 --> 02:44:30.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:30.150 --> 02:44:30.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:30.650 --> 02:44:32.410 align:middle line:90% Bruce E. Tarr. 02:44:32.410 --> 02:44:32.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:32.910 --> 02:44:33.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:33.770 --> 02:44:35.720 align:middle line:90% Walter F. Timilty. 02:44:35.720 --> 02:44:36.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:36.220 --> 02:44:37.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:37.120 --> 02:44:39.060 align:middle line:90% And James T. Welch. 02:44:39.060 --> 02:44:39.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:39.560 --> 02:44:41.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:41.220 --> 02:44:42.612 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:44:42.612 --> 02:44:43.320 align:middle line:90% Senator Chandler? 02:44:43.320 --> 02:44:47.980 align:middle line:90% 02:44:47.980 --> 02:44:49.040 align:middle line:90% Harriette L. Chandler. 02:44:49.040 --> 02:44:49.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:49.320 --> 02:44:49.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:44:49.820 --> 02:44:53.130 align:middle line:90% 02:44:53.130 --> 02:44:56.510 align:middle line:90% Yes, Senator from Belmont-- 02:44:56.510 --> 02:45:00.140 align:middle line:90% Suffolk and Middlesex. 02:45:00.140 --> 02:45:02.971 align:middle line:84% William N. Brownsberger votes yes. 02:45:02.971 --> 02:45:03.470 align:middle line:90% All set. 02:45:03.470 --> 02:45:04.310 align:middle line:90% All members-- 02:45:04.310 --> 02:45:14.060 align:middle line:90% 02:45:14.060 --> 02:45:15.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:45:15.140 --> 02:45:17.520 align:middle line:84% 37 in the affirmative, none in the negative. 02:45:17.520 --> 02:45:18.860 align:middle line:90% The amendment has been adopted. 02:45:18.860 --> 02:45:24.910 align:middle line:90% 02:45:24.910 --> 02:45:28.800 align:middle line:90% Amendment 42 is held. 02:45:28.800 --> 02:45:31.090 align:middle line:90% Amendment 43 is held. 02:45:31.090 --> 02:45:38.510 align:middle line:84% Amendment 44, the senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 02:45:38.510 --> 02:45:43.960 align:middle line:84% Mr. Tarr moves on Amendment 44, Municipal Gas Tax Exemption. 02:45:43.960 --> 02:45:47.000 align:middle line:90% All those in favor vote aye. 02:45:47.000 --> 02:45:47.900 align:middle line:90% All opposed. 02:45:47.900 --> 02:45:50.690 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 02:45:50.690 --> 02:45:55.260 align:middle line:84% The same senator moves item number 45. 02:45:55.260 --> 02:45:59.200 align:middle line:84% The clerk will-- the title of which the clerk will call. 02:45:59.200 --> 02:46:04.060 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 45 by Mr. Tarr, Excess Revenue For Local Aid. 02:46:04.060 --> 02:46:06.070 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:46:06.070 --> 02:46:07.350 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:46:07.350 --> 02:46:08.300 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:46:08.300 --> 02:46:09.830 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:46:09.830 --> 02:46:12.370 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Essex and Middlesex 02:46:12.370 --> 02:46:17.670 align:middle line:84% moves Amendment number 46, and the clerk will-- 02:46:17.670 --> 02:46:21.820 align:middle line:84% Essex and Middlesex moves Amendment number 46, 02:46:21.820 --> 02:46:26.460 align:middle line:84% and the clerk will call the title. 02:46:26.460 --> 02:46:31.844 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 46 by Mr. Tarr, Surplus Funds for Local Aid. 02:46:31.844 --> 02:46:34.010 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the adoption of the amendment. 02:46:34.010 --> 02:46:35.270 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:46:35.270 --> 02:46:36.170 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:46:36.170 --> 02:46:40.380 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 02:46:40.380 --> 02:46:44.440 align:middle line:84% The senator from Cape & Islands, Senator Cyr, 02:46:44.440 --> 02:46:49.070 align:middle line:90% moves item number 47. 02:46:49.070 --> 02:46:53.770 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 47 by Mr. Cyr, Nickerson State Park. 02:46:53.770 --> 02:46:54.720 align:middle line:90% Madam President? 02:46:54.720 --> 02:46:55.520 align:middle line:90% Yes? 02:46:55.520 --> 02:47:06.570 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:47:06.570 --> 02:47:09.930 align:middle line:84% And that is the senator from Cape & the Islands. 02:47:09.930 --> 02:47:12.640 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:47:12.640 --> 02:47:14.020 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:47:14.020 --> 02:47:14.970 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:47:14.970 --> 02:47:18.390 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 02:47:18.390 --> 02:47:23.430 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 48 has been withdrawn. 02:47:23.430 --> 02:47:27.030 align:middle line:84% Number Amendment 49 has been withdrawn. 02:47:27.030 --> 02:47:30.310 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 51-- the senator 02:47:30.310 --> 02:47:32.860 align:middle line:84% from Essex and Middlesex has crowd 02:47:32.860 --> 02:47:35.950 align:middle line:84% in amendment, the title of which the clerk will read. 02:47:35.950 --> 02:47:39.350 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 51 by Ms. L'Italien, Tewksbury Fire 02:47:39.350 --> 02:47:41.230 align:middle line:90% Department. 02:47:41.230 --> 02:47:45.610 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex, Ms. L'Italien. 02:47:45.610 --> 02:47:50.580 align:middle line:84% This amendment is set up to acknowledge the fact 02:47:50.580 --> 02:47:55.360 align:middle line:84% that the town of Tewksbury has a lot of costs that is attributed 02:47:55.360 --> 02:47:58.770 align:middle line:84% to their fire department in response to the Tewksbury State 02:47:58.770 --> 02:47:59.480 align:middle line:90% Hospital. 02:47:59.480 --> 02:48:02.720 align:middle line:84% So this is an amendment that we filed 02:48:02.720 --> 02:48:04.600 align:middle line:84% over the last couple of years, and we've 02:48:04.600 --> 02:48:07.820 align:middle line:84% been able to recognize and provide 02:48:07.820 --> 02:48:10.570 align:middle line:84% some financial relief for the town of Tewksbury. 02:48:10.570 --> 02:48:14.860 align:middle line:84% So this is a $90,000 amendment to reimburse 02:48:14.860 --> 02:48:19.050 align:middle line:84% the town of Tewksbury for their work 02:48:19.050 --> 02:48:23.130 align:middle line:84% with the Tewksbury State Hospital. 02:48:23.130 --> 02:48:24.620 align:middle line:84% Comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:48:24.620 --> 02:48:26.010 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:48:26.010 --> 02:48:26.680 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:48:26.680 --> 02:48:28.100 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:48:28.100 --> 02:48:30.505 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 50 has also been withdrawn. 02:48:30.505 --> 02:48:34.450 align:middle line:90% 02:48:34.450 --> 02:48:38.560 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 52 is held. 02:48:38.560 --> 02:48:39.950 align:middle line:90% Amend-- yes. 02:48:39.950 --> 02:48:41.380 align:middle line:90% That's Mr. Tarr. 02:48:41.380 --> 02:48:47.250 align:middle line:90% Just a moment to look it up. 02:48:47.250 --> 02:48:50.230 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I move the Senate be in a brief recess. 02:48:50.230 --> 02:48:50.800 align:middle line:90% Brief recess. 02:48:50.800 --> 02:49:27.410 align:middle line:90% 02:49:27.410 --> 02:49:28.990 align:middle line:90% Amend 53. 02:49:28.990 --> 02:49:33.280 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex has filed an amendment, the title 02:49:33.280 --> 02:49:34.720 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:49:34.720 --> 02:49:38.010 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 53 by Ms. Lovely, Danvers Technology 02:49:38.010 --> 02:49:40.300 align:middle line:90% Improvements. 02:49:40.300 --> 02:49:42.745 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Ms. Lovely. 02:49:42.745 --> 02:49:43.870 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 02:49:43.870 --> 02:49:47.080 align:middle line:84% This amendment provides $50,000 for municipal technology 02:49:47.080 --> 02:49:49.070 align:middle line:84% improvements in the town of Danvers. 02:49:49.070 --> 02:49:51.030 align:middle line:84% In February of 2016, the Collins Center 02:49:51.030 --> 02:49:53.510 align:middle line:84% for Public Management in UMass Boston 02:49:53.510 --> 02:49:55.880 align:middle line:84% completed a high level information technology review 02:49:55.880 --> 02:49:58.490 align:middle line:84% for the town, and the report show 02:49:58.490 --> 02:50:01.530 align:middle line:84% that funding would be used to implement recommendations, 02:50:01.530 --> 02:50:04.580 align:middle line:84% including eliminating redundancies and developing 02:50:04.580 --> 02:50:07.610 align:middle line:84% and implementing an IT strategy going forward. 02:50:07.610 --> 02:50:10.400 align:middle line:84% These improvements are wide-ranging and long overdue 02:50:10.400 --> 02:50:12.590 align:middle line:84% and would help the town provide government services 02:50:12.590 --> 02:50:14.920 align:middle line:84% more efficiently and effectively to its residents. 02:50:14.920 --> 02:50:16.420 align:middle line:90% I hope the amendment is adopted. 02:50:16.420 --> 02:50:18.187 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:50:18.187 --> 02:50:20.020 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:50:20.020 --> 02:50:21.310 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:50:21.310 --> 02:50:21.900 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:50:21.900 --> 02:50:23.120 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:50:23.120 --> 02:50:24.540 align:middle line:90% Number 54. 02:50:24.540 --> 02:50:26.710 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex 02:50:26.710 --> 02:50:28.720 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:50:28.720 --> 02:50:30.910 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:50:30.910 --> 02:50:35.250 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 54 on Mr. Tarr, Essex County Sheriff Registry 02:50:35.250 --> 02:50:37.010 align:middle line:90% of Deeds Partnership. 02:50:37.010 --> 02:50:39.010 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:50:39.010 --> 02:50:40.176 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:50:40.176 --> 02:50:40.680 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:50:40.680 --> 02:50:42.280 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 02:50:42.280 --> 02:50:43.966 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 55. 02:50:43.966 --> 02:50:48.570 align:middle line:90% 02:50:48.570 --> 02:50:50.609 align:middle line:90% Senate be in a brief recess. 02:50:50.609 --> 02:50:51.900 align:middle line:90% The Senate's in a brief recess. 02:50:51.900 --> 02:51:08.010 align:middle line:90% 02:51:08.010 --> 02:51:10.430 align:middle line:84% Senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 02:51:10.430 --> 02:51:12.940 align:middle line:90% Why, thank you, Madam President. 02:51:12.940 --> 02:51:15.440 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I request a unanimous consent 02:51:15.440 --> 02:51:16.720 align:middle line:90% of the Senate-- 02:51:16.720 --> 02:51:20.920 align:middle line:84% consider having taken no action on a virtuous amendment, number 02:51:20.920 --> 02:51:22.680 align:middle line:90% 54. 02:51:22.680 --> 02:51:26.090 align:middle line:84% Is there any opposition then to his request 02:51:26.090 --> 02:51:27.740 align:middle line:90% that no action be taken? 02:51:27.740 --> 02:51:29.350 align:middle line:90% And also laid aside temporarily. 02:51:29.350 --> 02:51:33.060 align:middle line:84% It will be laid aside temporarily. 02:51:33.060 --> 02:51:35.110 align:middle line:90% Item number 55. 02:51:35.110 --> 02:51:38.170 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex 02:51:38.170 --> 02:51:40.030 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:51:40.030 --> 02:51:41.780 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:51:41.780 --> 02:51:45.690 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 55 by Mr. Tarr, Grace Center Day Program. 02:51:45.690 --> 02:51:53.490 align:middle line:90% 02:51:53.490 --> 02:51:54.700 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:51:54.700 --> 02:51:55.550 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:51:55.550 --> 02:51:57.710 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:51:57.710 --> 02:51:59.810 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex 02:51:59.810 --> 02:52:02.500 align:middle line:84% again has filed an amendment, the title 02:52:02.500 --> 02:52:03.720 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:52:03.720 --> 02:52:05.860 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 56 by Mr. Tarr-- 02:52:05.860 --> 02:52:09.510 align:middle line:90% It's on hold. 02:52:09.510 --> 02:52:10.150 align:middle line:90% OK. 02:52:10.150 --> 02:52:11.990 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 57. 02:52:11.990 --> 02:52:14.690 align:middle line:84% Again, the senator from Essex and Middlesex 02:52:14.690 --> 02:52:16.200 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:52:16.200 --> 02:52:17.510 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:52:17.510 --> 02:52:21.890 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 57 by Mr. Tarr, Open Door Youth Program. 02:52:21.890 --> 02:52:23.900 align:middle line:84% The Senator from Essex and Middlesex. 02:52:23.900 --> 02:52:25.460 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to the members. 02:52:25.460 --> 02:52:27.626 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I move that this amendment be held. 02:52:27.626 --> 02:52:51.720 align:middle line:90% 02:52:51.720 --> 02:52:55.580 align:middle line:90% I'll take it. 02:52:55.580 --> 02:52:58.440 align:middle line:90% The item number 58 is held. 02:52:58.440 --> 02:53:00.410 align:middle line:90% Item number 59 is held. 02:53:00.410 --> 02:53:02.250 align:middle line:90% Item number 60 is held. 02:53:02.250 --> 02:53:04.030 align:middle line:90% Wow, busy. 02:53:04.030 --> 02:53:07.630 align:middle line:90% Item number 61 is held. 02:53:07.630 --> 02:53:10.010 align:middle line:90% Item number 62 is held. 02:53:10.010 --> 02:53:14.800 align:middle line:84% Item number 63-- the senator from-- 02:53:14.800 --> 02:53:17.350 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:53:17.350 --> 02:53:19.120 align:middle line:90% 63. 02:53:19.120 --> 02:53:20.475 align:middle line:90% I don't have-- 02:53:20.475 --> 02:53:20.975 align:middle line:90% 63. 02:53:20.975 --> 02:53:36.720 align:middle line:90% 02:53:36.720 --> 02:53:37.790 align:middle line:90% 65. 02:53:37.790 --> 02:53:40.530 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk and Suffolk 02:53:40.530 --> 02:53:42.150 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 02:53:42.150 --> 02:53:43.840 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will call. 02:53:43.840 --> 02:53:47.730 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 65 by Mr. Rush, West Roxbury Main Streets. 02:53:47.730 --> 02:53:50.620 align:middle line:90% 02:53:50.620 --> 02:53:51.646 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:53:51.646 --> 02:53:52.145 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:53:52.145 --> 02:53:55.132 align:middle line:90% 02:53:55.132 --> 02:53:57.590 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to the members. 02:53:57.590 --> 02:53:59.020 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I'm hoping that we 02:53:59.020 --> 02:54:00.728 align:middle line:84% can hear an explanation of this amendment 02:54:00.728 --> 02:54:04.850 align:middle line:84% from its sponsor, who is rising and with a huge smile, Madam 02:54:04.850 --> 02:54:05.800 align:middle line:90% President. 02:54:05.800 --> 02:54:09.000 align:middle line:84% Yes, the senator from Norfolk and Suffolk, Mr. Rush. 02:54:09.000 --> 02:54:11.860 align:middle line:90% 02:54:11.860 --> 02:54:15.240 align:middle line:84% I thank the minority leader, my good friend, for the question, 02:54:15.240 --> 02:54:19.470 align:middle line:84% and I relish in the opportunity to explain my amendments 02:54:19.470 --> 02:54:23.340 align:middle line:90% to the body this afternoon. 02:54:23.340 --> 02:54:26.540 align:middle line:84% Boston, as we all know, is a city of neighborhoods. 02:54:26.540 --> 02:54:31.660 align:middle line:84% But prior to 1995, many of our neighborhood business districts 02:54:31.660 --> 02:54:34.640 align:middle line:84% were in disarray, disrepair, and people were not 02:54:34.640 --> 02:54:38.470 align:middle line:84% going there to shop, eat, or do their day-to-day business. 02:54:38.470 --> 02:54:41.880 align:middle line:84% At the time, in 1995, then-Mayor Tom Menino 02:54:41.880 --> 02:54:47.990 align:middle line:84% launched an initiative known as the Boston Main Streets Program 02:54:47.990 --> 02:54:51.830 align:middle line:84% with the idea to look at each individual downtown 02:54:51.830 --> 02:54:54.280 align:middle line:84% area of our city's many neighborhoods, 02:54:54.280 --> 02:54:58.550 align:middle line:84% develop public-private partnerships to revitalize them 02:54:58.550 --> 02:55:02.280 align:middle line:84% and bring them down a road to success. 02:55:02.280 --> 02:55:03.440 align:middle line:90% This has happened. 02:55:03.440 --> 02:55:07.760 align:middle line:84% The Boston Main Streets Program is a national model. 02:55:07.760 --> 02:55:09.860 align:middle line:84% It has been chosen by the Pew Partnership 02:55:09.860 --> 02:55:12.890 align:middle line:84% as one of 19 solutions for America. 02:55:12.890 --> 02:55:15.700 align:middle line:84% This amendment specifically looks at the West Roxbury Main 02:55:15.700 --> 02:55:18.900 align:middle line:84% Streets Program, which is a nonprofit private-public 02:55:18.900 --> 02:55:19.920 align:middle line:90% partnership. 02:55:19.920 --> 02:55:23.670 align:middle line:84% It's located in the heart of the business district 02:55:23.670 --> 02:55:27.650 align:middle line:84% in the neighborhood of West Roxbury. 02:55:27.650 --> 02:55:30.660 align:middle line:84% Much like all the other Main Streets Programs, the key 02:55:30.660 --> 02:55:32.300 align:middle line:90% to success are fourfold. 02:55:32.300 --> 02:55:34.220 align:middle line:84% Number one, enhancing the physical appearance 02:55:34.220 --> 02:55:35.570 align:middle line:90% of the commercial district. 02:55:35.570 --> 02:55:38.390 align:middle line:84% Number two, improving its economic stability. 02:55:38.390 --> 02:55:41.470 align:middle line:84% Number three, marketing its features and benefits. 02:55:41.470 --> 02:55:46.060 align:middle line:84% And number four, promoting community involvement. 02:55:46.060 --> 02:55:50.210 align:middle line:84% This amendment will help this local Main Streets 02:55:50.210 --> 02:55:55.330 align:middle line:84% do all of that by giving it funding to create open space 02:55:55.330 --> 02:55:59.260 align:middle line:84% areas for community use, enhance tying the entire neighborhood 02:55:59.260 --> 02:56:04.120 align:middle line:84% business district together, for really outstanding success. 02:56:04.120 --> 02:56:06.010 align:middle line:84% And I ask that the amendment be adopted. 02:56:06.010 --> 02:56:06.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:56:06.850 --> 02:56:07.400 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:56:07.400 --> 02:56:09.600 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:56:09.600 --> 02:56:10.900 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:56:10.900 --> 02:56:11.850 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:56:11.850 --> 02:56:13.610 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:56:13.610 --> 02:56:15.800 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Norfolk and Suffolk 02:56:15.800 --> 02:56:21.640 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, Amendment number 66, the title 02:56:21.640 --> 02:56:23.160 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 02:56:23.160 --> 02:56:26.760 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 66 by Mr. Rush, Mother Brook Arts 02:56:26.760 --> 02:56:27.900 align:middle line:90% and Community Center. 02:56:27.900 --> 02:56:30.720 align:middle line:90% 02:56:30.720 --> 02:56:32.920 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:56:32.920 --> 02:56:34.510 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:56:34.510 --> 02:56:35.380 align:middle line:90% Oh, no. 02:56:35.380 --> 02:56:36.020 align:middle line:90% I'm sorry. 02:56:36.020 --> 02:56:37.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:56:37.720 --> 02:56:41.310 align:middle line:84% The senator from the Cape-- the senator 02:56:41.310 --> 02:56:43.742 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth and Barnstable. 02:56:43.742 --> 02:56:44.700 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 02:56:44.700 --> 02:56:46.980 align:middle line:84% And I was hoping that the gentleman from West Roxbury 02:56:46.980 --> 02:56:48.670 align:middle line:90% might be able to enlighten us. 02:56:48.670 --> 02:56:51.004 align:middle line:84% I've heard of this Mother Brook Arts Center, 02:56:51.004 --> 02:56:52.420 align:middle line:84% and I would hope that you might be 02:56:52.420 --> 02:56:55.310 align:middle line:84% able to clarify a little bit more detail what exactly we're 02:56:55.310 --> 02:56:58.130 align:middle line:90% doing here. 02:56:58.130 --> 02:57:00.000 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk and Suffolk. 02:57:00.000 --> 02:57:02.070 align:middle line:84% I thank the gentleman, my colleague and friend, 02:57:02.070 --> 02:57:02.990 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth. 02:57:02.990 --> 02:57:04.810 align:middle line:84% In fact, I think you did hear of it, 02:57:04.810 --> 02:57:06.290 align:middle line:90% because I think you were there. 02:57:06.290 --> 02:57:10.220 align:middle line:84% Back several months ago, this body 02:57:10.220 --> 02:57:13.160 align:middle line:84% undertook a second term of listening tours 02:57:13.160 --> 02:57:15.890 align:middle line:84% across the state, led by the Senate president and minority 02:57:15.890 --> 02:57:16.390 align:middle line:90% leader. 02:57:16.390 --> 02:57:21.420 align:middle line:84% And it gave this party an opportunity 02:57:21.420 --> 02:57:24.100 align:middle line:84% to see wonderful things across our districts 02:57:24.100 --> 02:57:25.780 align:middle line:90% and the entire Commonwealth. 02:57:25.780 --> 02:57:29.440 align:middle line:84% And if you remember, one morning we went to East Dedham, 02:57:29.440 --> 02:57:32.590 align:middle line:84% and we viewed what is known as the Mother Brook Arts 02:57:32.590 --> 02:57:34.610 align:middle line:84% and Community Center in the town of Dedham. 02:57:34.610 --> 02:57:36.580 align:middle line:84% This building, and the dedicated people, 02:57:36.580 --> 02:57:39.290 align:middle line:84% run the facility essentially to the cultural and community 02:57:39.290 --> 02:57:40.680 align:middle line:90% viability of the town. 02:57:40.680 --> 02:57:44.060 align:middle line:84% All who were present on that tour came away impressed 02:57:44.060 --> 02:57:46.940 align:middle line:84% and acknowledged that this is a model public-private 02:57:46.940 --> 02:57:48.750 align:middle line:84% partnership that should be shared 02:57:48.750 --> 02:57:51.030 align:middle line:84% all over the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 02:57:51.030 --> 02:57:54.330 align:middle line:84% for the feature and promotion of the arts 02:57:54.330 --> 02:57:56.310 align:middle line:84% throughout all of our communities. 02:57:56.310 --> 02:57:58.950 align:middle line:84% This amendment provides $30,000 for the development 02:57:58.950 --> 02:58:01.250 align:middle line:84% of an outdoor park for summer programs 02:58:01.250 --> 02:58:02.802 align:middle line:90% to enhance that facility. 02:58:02.802 --> 02:58:04.510 align:middle line:84% And I hope that the amendment is adopted. 02:58:04.510 --> 02:58:05.680 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 02:58:05.680 --> 02:58:07.730 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 02:58:07.730 --> 02:58:08.920 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:58:08.920 --> 02:58:09.740 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:58:09.740 --> 02:58:11.740 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:58:11.740 --> 02:58:14.580 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Norfolk and Suffolk 02:58:14.580 --> 02:58:19.040 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, number 67, the title of which 02:58:19.040 --> 02:58:20.140 align:middle line:90% the clerk will read. 02:58:20.140 --> 02:58:25.350 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 67 by Mr. Rush, Norwood Regional Facility. 02:58:25.350 --> 02:58:25.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:58:25.920 --> 02:58:30.780 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable. 02:58:30.780 --> 02:58:31.860 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 02:58:31.860 --> 02:58:34.530 align:middle line:84% And to the gentleman from West Roxbury, 02:58:34.530 --> 02:58:38.090 align:middle line:84% obviously you had some inkling in regards to Mother Brook, 02:58:38.090 --> 02:58:42.100 align:middle line:84% but I have no idea what the Norwood Regional Facility is. 02:58:42.100 --> 02:58:44.060 align:middle line:84% And so maybe you could enlighten the body 02:58:44.060 --> 02:58:47.620 align:middle line:84% on what that is, because we were all impressed with the Mother 02:58:47.620 --> 02:58:49.810 align:middle line:84% Brook, but Norwood Regional Facility, 02:58:49.810 --> 02:58:52.570 align:middle line:90% we're not so sure about. 02:58:52.570 --> 02:58:54.362 align:middle line:84% Senator from Norfolk and Suffolk, Mr. Rush. 02:58:54.362 --> 02:58:56.820 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to the members. 02:58:56.820 --> 02:58:58.700 align:middle line:84% And I thank you for the question again. 02:58:58.700 --> 02:59:01.150 align:middle line:84% And of course, if you weren't sure-- 02:59:01.150 --> 02:59:04.050 align:middle line:84% another piece of that is the Mother Brook, 02:59:04.050 --> 02:59:08.700 align:middle line:84% located in Norfolk County, is the oldest man-made canal 02:59:08.700 --> 02:59:13.690 align:middle line:84% in the United States, attaching the [INAUDIBLE] Neponset 02:59:13.690 --> 02:59:16.120 align:middle line:84% River to the Charles River, and ultimately 02:59:16.120 --> 02:59:20.970 align:middle line:84% led to a real flourishing of mills along that brook. 02:59:20.970 --> 02:59:22.300 align:middle line:90% But I digress. 02:59:22.300 --> 02:59:25.090 align:middle line:84% As we all work with our local municipal partners, 02:59:25.090 --> 02:59:29.530 align:middle line:84% this is an example of Amendment number 67 02:59:29.530 --> 02:59:32.210 align:middle line:84% and working with the town officials 02:59:32.210 --> 02:59:33.690 align:middle line:90% in the town of Norwood. 02:59:33.690 --> 02:59:37.190 align:middle line:84% And my local representative from that town-- 02:59:37.190 --> 02:59:40.670 align:middle line:84% they are looking to create a regional recreational facility. 02:59:40.670 --> 02:59:44.070 align:middle line:84% As part of that, they need to relocate tennis courts 02:59:44.070 --> 02:59:46.690 align:middle line:90% to enhance and expand the space. 02:59:46.690 --> 02:59:49.930 align:middle line:84% And they came to me and asked if we could help out on this end 02:59:49.930 --> 02:59:52.760 align:middle line:84% to help them as they're looking in a private-public partnership 02:59:52.760 --> 02:59:54.080 align:middle line:90% to complete the program. 02:59:54.080 --> 02:59:56.890 align:middle line:84% And I told them, as we all do to our municipal officials, 02:59:56.890 --> 03:00:00.140 align:middle line:84% I'd be more than happy to lend a hand 03:00:00.140 --> 03:00:03.020 align:middle line:84% to create recreational opportunities for folks 03:00:03.020 --> 03:00:05.280 align:middle line:84% in that town and the entire surrounding area. 03:00:05.280 --> 03:00:06.980 align:middle line:84% And that's what this amendment does. 03:00:06.980 --> 03:00:10.644 align:middle line:84% And Madam President, I hope that the amendment is adopted. 03:00:10.644 --> 03:00:12.810 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the adoption of the amendment. 03:00:12.810 --> 03:00:14.090 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:00:14.090 --> 03:00:15.040 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:00:15.040 --> 03:00:18.400 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:00:18.400 --> 03:00:19.700 align:middle line:90% Number 68. 03:00:19.700 --> 03:00:22.380 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, 03:00:22.380 --> 03:00:26.060 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Senator Gobi, has filed an amendment, the title 03:00:26.060 --> 03:00:27.520 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:00:27.520 --> 03:00:31.950 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 68 by Ms. Gobi, Brimfield Windmill. 03:00:31.950 --> 03:00:34.380 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable. 03:00:34.380 --> 03:00:35.380 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 03:00:35.380 --> 03:00:39.400 align:middle line:84% And I want to ask the gentlelady from-- 03:00:39.400 --> 03:00:40.830 align:middle line:90% where exactly is that from? 03:00:40.830 --> 03:00:43.500 align:middle line:90% Worcester-Hampden district. 03:00:43.500 --> 03:00:46.610 align:middle line:84% Now, I happen to be a very big fan of antiquing, 03:00:46.610 --> 03:00:48.860 align:middle line:84% and I'm a big fan of the Brimfield Fair. 03:00:48.860 --> 03:00:52.500 align:middle line:84% I don't recall ever seeing this Brimfield Windmill. 03:00:52.500 --> 03:00:54.990 align:middle line:84% So maybe you might be able to speak a little bit about this 03:00:54.990 --> 03:00:57.270 align:middle line:84% and how this is going to enhance the Brimfield 03:00:57.270 --> 03:00:59.920 align:middle line:84% experience that so many of us across the Commonwealth 03:00:59.920 --> 03:01:02.430 align:middle line:90% go to enjoy three times a year. 03:01:02.430 --> 03:01:04.415 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Hampden-- 03:01:04.415 --> 03:01:08.610 align:middle line:90% 03:01:08.610 --> 03:01:09.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 03:01:09.110 --> 03:01:12.690 align:middle line:90% The windmill is from the 1800s. 03:01:12.690 --> 03:01:14.487 align:middle line:84% It's actually right on Route 20, so 03:01:14.487 --> 03:01:16.070 align:middle line:84% as you are-- if you're going that way, 03:01:16.070 --> 03:01:19.250 align:middle line:84% driving into Brimfield on Sturbridge Road. 03:01:19.250 --> 03:01:21.310 align:middle line:90% And one little thing on this-- 03:01:21.310 --> 03:01:23.700 align:middle line:84% I think it may say in yours for $50,000. 03:01:23.700 --> 03:01:25.270 align:middle line:90% It's actually $15,000. 03:01:25.270 --> 03:01:29.260 align:middle line:84% This is for-- there's a 501(c)(3) that had been formed 03:01:29.260 --> 03:01:31.650 align:middle line:84% to do a complete restoration of the windmill. 03:01:31.650 --> 03:01:34.787 align:middle line:84% They're about $15,000, to get them over the top, 03:01:34.787 --> 03:01:37.120 align:middle line:84% and they've raised all the rest of the funds themselves. 03:01:37.120 --> 03:01:38.880 align:middle line:84% So the next time you're going to Brimfield 03:01:38.880 --> 03:01:42.690 align:middle line:84% during July, hopefully you'll see it in operation by then. 03:01:42.690 --> 03:01:44.120 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:01:44.120 --> 03:01:44.780 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:01:44.780 --> 03:01:47.810 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:01:47.810 --> 03:01:49.110 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:01:49.110 --> 03:01:50.030 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:01:50.030 --> 03:01:53.100 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:01:53.100 --> 03:01:55.920 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 69. 03:01:55.920 --> 03:01:59.680 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, 03:01:59.680 --> 03:02:02.030 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex has filed an amendment, the title 03:02:02.030 --> 03:02:03.930 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:02:03.930 --> 03:02:08.500 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 69 by Ms. Gobi, Wales Food Pantry Driver. 03:02:08.500 --> 03:02:12.720 align:middle line:90% 03:02:12.720 --> 03:02:16.240 align:middle line:90% The senator-- OK. 03:02:16.240 --> 03:02:18.830 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:02:18.830 --> 03:02:20.370 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:02:20.370 --> 03:02:21.550 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:02:21.550 --> 03:02:25.420 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:02:25.420 --> 03:02:28.260 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, 03:02:28.260 --> 03:02:33.030 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex has filed Amendment number 70, the title 03:02:33.030 --> 03:02:34.600 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:02:34.600 --> 03:02:39.570 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 70 by Ms. Gobi, Hardwick Pond Invasive Species. 03:02:39.570 --> 03:02:42.920 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable. 03:02:42.920 --> 03:02:44.100 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 03:02:44.100 --> 03:02:46.010 align:middle line:84% And I'd just like to take this opportunity 03:02:46.010 --> 03:02:48.602 align:middle line:84% to ask the gentlelady a question in 03:02:48.602 --> 03:02:50.060 align:middle line:84% regards to this specific amendment, 03:02:50.060 --> 03:02:52.810 align:middle line:84% in regards to Hardwick Pond, and what 03:02:52.810 --> 03:02:56.050 align:middle line:84% exactly this particular amendment would be doing. 03:02:56.050 --> 03:02:56.690 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:02:56.690 --> 03:02:59.020 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, 03:02:59.020 --> 03:03:00.700 align:middle line:90% and Middlesex, Senator Gobi. 03:03:00.700 --> 03:03:02.010 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:03:02.010 --> 03:03:04.677 align:middle line:84% In this case, this pond is located, actually, 03:03:04.677 --> 03:03:06.260 align:middle line:84% fairly close to the Quabbin Reservoir, 03:03:06.260 --> 03:03:07.810 align:middle line:90% about two miles away. 03:03:07.810 --> 03:03:10.750 align:middle line:84% And again, our group has been working very diligently 03:03:10.750 --> 03:03:12.030 align:middle line:90% to try to remove this. 03:03:12.030 --> 03:03:14.750 align:middle line:84% As you know, we have a big problem 03:03:14.750 --> 03:03:17.870 align:middle line:84% with invasive species in our lakes and ponds. 03:03:17.870 --> 03:03:21.330 align:middle line:84% This $40,000 will help them finish 03:03:21.330 --> 03:03:24.460 align:middle line:84% doing what needs to be done for the management. 03:03:24.460 --> 03:03:27.280 align:middle line:84% Once they get this done, then this group 03:03:27.280 --> 03:03:29.930 align:middle line:84% intends to be up to manage it completely on their own. 03:03:29.930 --> 03:03:31.380 align:middle line:84% They needed this kind of infusion 03:03:31.380 --> 03:03:34.302 align:middle line:84% to help them to begin with, and then hopefully this 03:03:34.302 --> 03:03:36.010 align:middle line:84% will be the last time I need to come back 03:03:36.010 --> 03:03:38.150 align:middle line:84% to ask for any money for Hardwick Pond. 03:03:38.150 --> 03:03:41.087 align:middle line:90% So thank you. 03:03:41.087 --> 03:03:41.920 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 03:03:41.920 --> 03:03:44.270 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:03:44.270 --> 03:03:46.210 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:03:46.210 --> 03:03:47.190 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:03:47.190 --> 03:03:50.520 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:03:50.520 --> 03:03:53.220 align:middle line:84% The senators-- Amendment number 71. 03:03:53.220 --> 03:03:56.000 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex, 03:03:56.000 --> 03:03:58.890 align:middle line:84% Senator Ross, has filed an amendment, the title 03:03:58.890 --> 03:04:00.790 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:04:00.790 --> 03:04:05.410 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 71 by Mr. Ross, Natick School Overcrowding. 03:04:05.410 --> 03:04:08.650 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex, 03:04:08.650 --> 03:04:11.492 align:middle line:90% Mr. Ross. 03:04:11.492 --> 03:04:12.450 align:middle line:90% Just had the wrong one. 03:04:12.450 --> 03:04:12.950 align:middle line:90% Sorry. 03:04:12.950 --> 03:04:15.221 align:middle line:90% 03:04:15.221 --> 03:04:16.970 align:middle line:84% I rise in support of this amendment, which 03:04:16.970 --> 03:04:20.020 align:middle line:84% would provide $200,000 to the town of Natick 03:04:20.020 --> 03:04:22.940 align:middle line:84% to assist in overcrowding at the Natick public schools. 03:04:22.940 --> 03:04:25.930 align:middle line:84% It's important that our students receive high-quality education. 03:04:25.930 --> 03:04:28.700 align:middle line:84% They have many projects that they're working on there, 03:04:28.700 --> 03:04:31.810 align:middle line:84% and it's difficult for teachers to divide their time with too 03:04:31.810 --> 03:04:33.110 align:middle line:90% many students in the classroom. 03:04:33.110 --> 03:04:35.610 align:middle line:84% So this will help them get the number of students 03:04:35.610 --> 03:04:37.310 align:middle line:84% down in their particular classrooms 03:04:37.310 --> 03:04:39.694 align:middle line:84% and to assist the students in learning more 03:04:39.694 --> 03:04:41.360 align:middle line:84% during the course of their learning day. 03:04:41.360 --> 03:04:43.140 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:04:43.140 --> 03:04:44.740 align:middle line:84% Comes into adoption of the amendment. 03:04:44.740 --> 03:04:46.060 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:04:46.060 --> 03:04:46.960 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:04:46.960 --> 03:04:50.500 align:middle line:84% The nays have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:04:50.500 --> 03:04:53.440 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 72 is on hold. 03:04:53.440 --> 03:04:55.570 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 73. 03:04:55.570 --> 03:04:59.400 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. Brady, 03:04:59.400 --> 03:05:01.010 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:05:01.010 --> 03:05:02.460 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:05:02.460 --> 03:05:05.032 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 73 by Mr. Brady, Public School 03:05:05.032 --> 03:05:05.615 align:middle line:90% Reimbursement. 03:05:05.615 --> 03:05:12.280 align:middle line:90% 03:05:12.280 --> 03:05:16.100 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 03:05:16.100 --> 03:05:16.800 align:middle line:90% Mr. Brady. 03:05:16.800 --> 03:05:20.100 align:middle line:90% 03:05:20.100 --> 03:05:21.270 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:05:21.270 --> 03:05:26.320 align:middle line:84% Let me just ask to make a brief comment on this. 03:05:26.320 --> 03:05:27.820 align:middle line:90% And I ask for unanimous consent. 03:05:27.820 --> 03:05:29.060 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:05:29.060 --> 03:05:33.170 align:middle line:84% This amendment I filed is due to the unforeseen cutbacks 03:05:33.170 --> 03:05:35.190 align:middle line:84% in school funding across the Commonwealth 03:05:35.190 --> 03:05:38.670 align:middle line:84% for a lot of less fortunate districts 03:05:38.670 --> 03:05:42.020 align:middle line:84% that don't have the revenue that other parts of the Commonwealth 03:05:42.020 --> 03:05:42.760 align:middle line:90% has. 03:05:42.760 --> 03:05:46.170 align:middle line:84% And I know that the Senate president in this body 03:05:46.170 --> 03:05:49.184 align:middle line:84% has put more money into the budget than was in the House 03:05:49.184 --> 03:05:50.850 align:middle line:84% side, or the governor may have proposed. 03:05:50.850 --> 03:05:54.340 align:middle line:84% And I thank the leadership and the House Ways and Means 03:05:54.340 --> 03:05:57.510 align:middle line:84% chairperson to help communities such as Brockton. 03:05:57.510 --> 03:05:59.600 align:middle line:84% Upper Brockton has still been devastated 03:05:59.600 --> 03:06:03.140 align:middle line:84% by the foundation for them that this governor has proposed 03:06:03.140 --> 03:06:06.760 align:middle line:84% in change in the way they fund school districts, especially 03:06:06.760 --> 03:06:08.970 align:middle line:90% less fortunate school districts. 03:06:08.970 --> 03:06:10.820 align:middle line:84% So I file this amendment in hopes 03:06:10.820 --> 03:06:13.220 align:middle line:84% that we can get some more money into the budget. 03:06:13.220 --> 03:06:15.670 align:middle line:84% It provides aid to Chapter 70 money-- 03:06:15.670 --> 03:06:17.010 align:middle line:90% no less than the previous year. 03:06:17.010 --> 03:06:20.240 align:middle line:84% It provides additional aid to districts with rising costs, 03:06:20.240 --> 03:06:22.990 align:middle line:84% and without additional aid, increased resources 03:06:22.990 --> 03:06:25.510 align:middle line:84% would lag behind the increase in the cost. 03:06:25.510 --> 03:06:28.550 align:middle line:84% And as was noted in the media, a community 03:06:28.550 --> 03:06:29.800 align:middle line:90% such as the city of Brockton-- 03:06:29.800 --> 03:06:32.940 align:middle line:84% I know there's other communities similar to Brockton that has 03:06:32.940 --> 03:06:34.930 align:middle line:90% shut out many, many pink slips. 03:06:34.930 --> 03:06:37.780 align:middle line:84% And without the support of the state, 03:06:37.780 --> 03:06:40.020 align:middle line:84% our school systems would not survive. 03:06:40.020 --> 03:06:42.840 align:middle line:84% So I thank the leadership and this body that 03:06:42.840 --> 03:06:45.687 align:middle line:84% put additional money into the budget 03:06:45.687 --> 03:06:47.270 align:middle line:84% for our school districts, but I'm just 03:06:47.270 --> 03:06:49.040 align:middle line:84% asking if there's any possibility 03:06:49.040 --> 03:06:52.280 align:middle line:84% to find some more revenue to go back to our school districts. 03:06:52.280 --> 03:06:53.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:06:53.850 --> 03:06:55.310 align:middle line:84% Comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:06:55.310 --> 03:06:56.500 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:06:56.500 --> 03:06:57.340 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:06:57.340 --> 03:07:00.200 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:07:00.200 --> 03:07:01.940 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 74. 03:07:01.940 --> 03:07:05.010 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Mr. Moore, 03:07:05.010 --> 03:07:06.880 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:07:06.880 --> 03:07:09.500 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:07:09.500 --> 03:07:13.082 align:middle line:84% Offered by Mr. Moore, Municipal Modernization Updates. 03:07:13.082 --> 03:07:14.790 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable. 03:07:14.790 --> 03:07:18.499 align:middle line:90% 03:07:18.499 --> 03:07:20.040 align:middle line:84% The district might be able to give us 03:07:20.040 --> 03:07:23.440 align:middle line:84% an explanation about these municipal modernization updates 03:07:23.440 --> 03:07:25.570 align:middle line:90% that you are advocating for. 03:07:25.570 --> 03:07:28.220 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Mr. Moore. 03:07:28.220 --> 03:07:28.720 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:07:28.720 --> 03:07:29.940 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:07:29.940 --> 03:07:32.100 align:middle line:84% This amendment would make some minor changes 03:07:32.100 --> 03:07:36.750 align:middle line:84% to the Municipal Modernization Act related 03:07:36.750 --> 03:07:41.520 align:middle line:84% to the revolving funds used in the city and town's overlay 03:07:41.520 --> 03:07:42.340 align:middle line:90% accounts. 03:07:42.340 --> 03:07:44.170 align:middle line:84% The first section allows the overlay 03:07:44.170 --> 03:07:47.910 align:middle line:84% accounts to be used for interest payments in any fiscal year. 03:07:47.910 --> 03:07:51.240 align:middle line:84% The second section provides a temporary one-year reprieve 03:07:51.240 --> 03:07:54.340 align:middle line:84% from the requirement that revolving funds be established 03:07:54.340 --> 03:07:57.010 align:middle line:90% by bylaw or ordinance. 03:07:57.010 --> 03:07:59.510 align:middle line:84% I understand that there has been quite a bit of unhappiness 03:07:59.510 --> 03:08:02.190 align:middle line:84% in our cities and towns with this requirement 03:08:02.190 --> 03:08:04.190 align:middle line:90% that it has to go to on bylaws. 03:08:04.190 --> 03:08:06.100 align:middle line:84% So they would like to see it adjusted 03:08:06.100 --> 03:08:07.690 align:middle line:84% till they can have either option. 03:08:07.690 --> 03:08:10.050 align:middle line:84% I ask for your support in the passage of this amendment. 03:08:10.050 --> 03:08:10.550 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:08:10.550 --> 03:08:12.400 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:08:12.400 --> 03:08:13.566 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:08:13.566 --> 03:08:14.080 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:08:14.080 --> 03:08:17.010 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:08:17.010 --> 03:08:20.110 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 75 is on hold. 03:08:20.110 --> 03:08:22.240 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 76. 03:08:22.240 --> 03:08:24.950 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex, 03:08:24.950 --> 03:08:27.390 align:middle line:84% Mr. Ross, has filed an amendment, the title 03:08:27.390 --> 03:08:29.090 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:08:29.090 --> 03:08:33.980 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 76 by Mr. Ross, Norfolk Police Carport. 03:08:33.980 --> 03:08:36.144 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:08:36.144 --> 03:08:37.310 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:08:37.310 --> 03:08:37.950 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:08:37.950 --> 03:08:38.660 align:middle line:90% The nos have it. 03:08:38.660 --> 03:08:40.470 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 03:08:40.470 --> 03:08:43.280 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 77 has been withdrawn. 03:08:43.280 --> 03:08:45.150 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 78. 03:08:45.150 --> 03:08:48.460 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex 03:08:48.460 --> 03:08:50.170 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:08:50.170 --> 03:08:51.730 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:08:51.730 --> 03:08:54.950 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 78 by Mr. Ross, Traffic Improvements 03:08:54.950 --> 03:08:56.690 align:middle line:90% in Norfolk Intersection. 03:08:56.690 --> 03:08:58.690 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:08:58.690 --> 03:08:59.856 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:08:59.856 --> 03:09:00.530 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:09:00.530 --> 03:09:03.140 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:09:03.140 --> 03:09:04.830 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 79. 03:09:04.830 --> 03:09:08.330 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. Pacheco, 03:09:08.330 --> 03:09:09.890 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:09:09.890 --> 03:09:11.520 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:09:11.520 --> 03:09:14.670 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 79 by Mr. Pacheco, Carver Council 03:09:14.670 --> 03:09:17.477 align:middle line:90% on Aging. 03:09:17.477 --> 03:09:19.310 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:09:19.310 --> 03:09:20.476 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:09:20.476 --> 03:09:21.140 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:09:21.140 --> 03:09:23.880 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:09:23.880 --> 03:09:25.440 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 78. 03:09:25.440 --> 03:09:28.970 align:middle line:90% The same senator from Plymouth-- 03:09:28.970 --> 03:09:29.470 align:middle line:90% 80. 03:09:29.470 --> 03:09:31.840 align:middle line:90% I'm sorry. 03:09:31.840 --> 03:09:32.970 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 80. 03:09:32.970 --> 03:09:35.080 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Plymouth and Bristol 03:09:35.080 --> 03:09:36.750 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:09:36.750 --> 03:09:37.980 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:09:37.980 --> 03:09:41.030 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 80 by Mr. Pacheco, Wareham Veterans 03:09:41.030 --> 03:09:43.354 align:middle line:90% Council Moving Wall. 03:09:43.354 --> 03:09:45.520 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the adoption of the amendment. 03:09:45.520 --> 03:09:46.720 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:09:46.720 --> 03:09:47.670 align:middle line:90% Opposed, nay. 03:09:47.670 --> 03:09:51.120 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:09:51.120 --> 03:09:52.760 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 81. 03:09:52.760 --> 03:09:57.700 align:middle line:84% Again, the same senator has filed an amendment, the title 03:09:57.700 --> 03:09:59.110 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:09:59.110 --> 03:10:02.260 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 81 by Mr. Pacheco, Taunton Education 03:10:02.260 --> 03:10:04.520 align:middle line:90% and Training Collaborative. 03:10:04.520 --> 03:10:07.510 align:middle line:84% Senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex. 03:10:07.510 --> 03:10:09.010 align:middle line:84% Well, well, well, Madam President. 03:10:09.010 --> 03:10:12.160 align:middle line:84% The gentleman from Taunton is certainly on a roll 03:10:12.160 --> 03:10:13.620 align:middle line:90% here this afternoon. 03:10:13.620 --> 03:10:16.070 align:middle line:84% But Madam President, I'm hoping that he 03:10:16.070 --> 03:10:18.750 align:middle line:84% can explain to us the pending amendment, which 03:10:18.750 --> 03:10:23.200 align:middle line:84% is for the Taunton Education and Training Collaborative. 03:10:23.200 --> 03:10:26.140 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk-- from Bristol. 03:10:26.140 --> 03:10:30.330 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Madam President. 03:10:30.330 --> 03:10:36.100 align:middle line:84% Let me just begin by thanking our Senate 03:10:36.100 --> 03:10:40.600 align:middle line:84% president and the Chair of Ways and Means and the Ways 03:10:40.600 --> 03:10:44.010 align:middle line:84% and Means staff, all those leaders on the Ways and Means 03:10:44.010 --> 03:10:48.030 align:middle line:84% Committee, for putting together this budget. 03:10:48.030 --> 03:10:51.070 align:middle line:84% And it is a very difficult budget this year. 03:10:51.070 --> 03:10:55.810 align:middle line:84% But we see in this budget to try to deal with a lot of issues, 03:10:55.810 --> 03:10:59.080 align:middle line:84% at the local level in particular, that have 03:10:59.080 --> 03:11:03.520 align:middle line:90% been pending for some time. 03:11:03.520 --> 03:11:08.170 align:middle line:84% Back when we did the significant bill 03:11:08.170 --> 03:11:11.790 align:middle line:84% relative to biotechnologies here in the Commonwealth 03:11:11.790 --> 03:11:15.260 align:middle line:84% of Massachusetts, as part of that legislation, 03:11:15.260 --> 03:11:23.070 align:middle line:84% we had set into state statute an education 03:11:23.070 --> 03:11:27.080 align:middle line:84% and training center in the city of Taunton 03:11:27.080 --> 03:11:29.650 align:middle line:90% at the Miles Standish Park. 03:11:29.650 --> 03:11:34.510 align:middle line:84% And many of you that went on the Commonwealth Conversations Tour 03:11:34.510 --> 03:11:39.920 align:middle line:84% visited the Miles Standish Park and saw the new facility 03:11:39.920 --> 03:11:43.530 align:middle line:84% that Martignetti Corporation is housing there. 03:11:43.530 --> 03:11:47.030 align:middle line:84% As you can remember from that tour, 03:11:47.030 --> 03:11:50.570 align:middle line:84% there was a lot of logistics technology 03:11:50.570 --> 03:11:55.610 align:middle line:84% that was set aside as part of that corporation. 03:11:55.610 --> 03:12:00.550 align:middle line:84% Right now, at the park, we have over 8,000 03:12:00.550 --> 03:12:04.270 align:middle line:84% private sector jobs that have been created 03:12:04.270 --> 03:12:06.400 align:middle line:90% at the Miles Standish Park. 03:12:06.400 --> 03:12:11.530 align:middle line:84% A significant number of companies, 03:12:11.530 --> 03:12:14.880 align:middle line:84% cutting-edge technologies, that are starting 03:12:14.880 --> 03:12:17.120 align:middle line:90% to hum within the park. 03:12:17.120 --> 03:12:21.310 align:middle line:84% And what we created here was an education collaborative 03:12:21.310 --> 03:12:24.330 align:middle line:84% within the southeast region, working 03:12:24.330 --> 03:12:28.380 align:middle line:84% with the existing public and private higher education 03:12:28.380 --> 03:12:32.020 align:middle line:84% institutions throughout southeastern Massachusetts, 03:12:32.020 --> 03:12:35.560 align:middle line:84% to locate this education and training center 03:12:35.560 --> 03:12:37.890 align:middle line:84% right in the heart of where there's 03:12:37.890 --> 03:12:40.590 align:middle line:84% education and training that is needed 03:12:40.590 --> 03:12:47.220 align:middle line:84% to upgrade skills and technology in the Miles Standish Park. 03:12:47.220 --> 03:12:49.430 align:middle line:90% And so this amendment-- 03:12:49.430 --> 03:12:52.430 align:middle line:84% there's already been a study done on it, 03:12:52.430 --> 03:12:56.440 align:middle line:84% that it is something that ought to go forward. 03:12:56.440 --> 03:13:01.280 align:middle line:84% We have over $5 million set aside 03:13:01.280 --> 03:13:05.580 align:middle line:84% in capital authorization that has been approved 03:13:05.580 --> 03:13:11.080 align:middle line:84% and authorized but has not been released, unfortunately, 03:13:11.080 --> 03:13:15.650 align:middle line:90% by the executive branch yet. 03:13:15.650 --> 03:13:18.740 align:middle line:84% The $250,000 that's in this line item 03:13:18.740 --> 03:13:25.120 align:middle line:84% will allow for the operational money and an implementation 03:13:25.120 --> 03:13:31.510 align:middle line:84% study to be done, so we can get the management study done, 03:13:31.510 --> 03:13:36.510 align:middle line:84% so the administration can see exactly how the management will 03:13:36.510 --> 03:13:37.730 align:middle line:90% be implemented. 03:13:37.730 --> 03:13:42.610 align:middle line:84% And we already have a board that has been appointed already, 03:13:42.610 --> 03:13:47.710 align:middle line:84% so we have the center in place from a virtual perspective. 03:13:47.710 --> 03:13:53.580 align:middle line:84% But to actually have this center come from the ground 03:13:53.580 --> 03:13:56.270 align:middle line:84% and build up, so that we can actually 03:13:56.270 --> 03:14:02.970 align:middle line:84% work to help educate and train the existing workforce, 03:14:02.970 --> 03:14:06.690 align:middle line:84% we need these funds to get to the next level 03:14:06.690 --> 03:14:08.020 align:middle line:90% of implementation. 03:14:08.020 --> 03:14:11.517 align:middle line:84% So that's what this bill does, this amendment does. 03:14:11.517 --> 03:14:12.600 align:middle line:90% Adoption of the amendment. 03:14:12.600 --> 03:14:13.766 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:14:13.766 --> 03:14:14.320 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:14:14.320 --> 03:14:18.010 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:14:18.010 --> 03:14:19.530 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 82. 03:14:19.530 --> 03:14:22.740 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor, 03:14:22.740 --> 03:14:24.310 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, to the title 03:14:24.310 --> 03:14:25.910 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:14:25.910 --> 03:14:30.280 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 82 by Mr. O'Connor, Hingham Sidewalk 03:14:30.280 --> 03:14:31.790 align:middle line:90% Plow. 03:14:31.790 --> 03:14:34.210 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Norfolk, Mr. O'Connor. 03:14:34.210 --> 03:14:38.660 align:middle line:84% Madam President, thank you for the opportunity [INAUDIBLE] 03:14:38.660 --> 03:14:42.150 align:middle line:84% a local earmark for $40,000 for a sidewalk 03:14:42.150 --> 03:14:44.190 align:middle line:84% plow in the community of Hingham. 03:14:44.190 --> 03:14:46.550 align:middle line:84% The two sidewalk plows that the town of Hingham 03:14:46.550 --> 03:14:49.720 align:middle line:84% currently have right now are 17 years old and 19 years old. 03:14:49.720 --> 03:14:51.970 align:middle line:84% I think that, in reading through the amendments 03:14:51.970 --> 03:14:54.490 align:middle line:84% over the past week, that a lot of our local communities 03:14:54.490 --> 03:14:55.610 align:middle line:90% are facing the same issue. 03:14:55.610 --> 03:14:57.610 align:middle line:84% With the rising costs of health insurance, 03:14:57.610 --> 03:15:01.820 align:middle line:84% as well as pension liability schedule and the looking down 03:15:01.820 --> 03:15:04.320 align:middle line:84% the barrel of the gun at OPEB, that a lot of our communities 03:15:04.320 --> 03:15:06.157 align:middle line:84% can't afford some of these essential items 03:15:06.157 --> 03:15:07.990 align:middle line:84% that are incredibly important to the quality 03:15:07.990 --> 03:15:10.370 align:middle line:84% of life of our residents and our constituents. 03:15:10.370 --> 03:15:13.180 align:middle line:84% And I would really hope for favorable action 03:15:13.180 --> 03:15:16.860 align:middle line:84% on this specific one so that we can replace one of the two 03:15:16.860 --> 03:15:18.970 align:middle line:84% sidewalk plows that are nearly 20 years old 03:15:18.970 --> 03:15:20.050 align:middle line:90% in the town of Hingham. 03:15:20.050 --> 03:15:21.175 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:15:21.175 --> 03:15:23.810 align:middle line:90% 03:15:23.810 --> 03:15:27.910 align:middle line:90% The senator from Plymouth. 03:15:27.910 --> 03:15:29.830 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:15:29.830 --> 03:15:31.490 align:middle line:90% I'm hoping if the gentleman-- 03:15:31.490 --> 03:15:33.910 align:middle line:84% if they were able to do conductive concrete, 03:15:33.910 --> 03:15:35.310 align:middle line:90% would they need these plows? 03:15:35.310 --> 03:15:39.094 align:middle line:84% And so I was hoping you might be able to answer that. 03:15:39.094 --> 03:15:41.260 align:middle line:84% The question comes on the adoption of the amendment. 03:15:41.260 --> 03:15:43.240 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:15:43.240 --> 03:15:44.010 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:15:44.010 --> 03:15:46.830 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:15:46.830 --> 03:15:51.290 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 83 the senator from Plymouth and Bristol, 03:15:51.290 --> 03:15:54.510 align:middle line:84% Senator Pacheco, has filed an amendment, the title 03:15:54.510 --> 03:15:56.200 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:15:56.200 --> 03:15:59.840 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 83 by Mr. Pacheco, Taunton Opioid Tax 03:15:59.840 --> 03:16:02.740 align:middle line:84% Force Community Follow-Up Pilot Program. 03:16:02.740 --> 03:16:03.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 03:16:03.390 --> 03:16:07.440 align:middle line:84% The senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 03:16:07.440 --> 03:16:09.220 align:middle line:84% Well, thank you, Madam President. 03:16:09.220 --> 03:16:13.650 align:middle line:84% The roll continues here for the gentleman from Taunton. 03:16:13.650 --> 03:16:16.390 align:middle line:84% This amendment has to do with a very important subject, 03:16:16.390 --> 03:16:19.070 align:middle line:84% and that is opiates and confronting 03:16:19.070 --> 03:16:20.420 align:middle line:90% the opiate epidemic. 03:16:20.420 --> 03:16:23.030 align:middle line:84% And this amendment appears to focus specifically 03:16:23.030 --> 03:16:26.100 align:middle line:84% on Taunton, or at least the region around Taunton, 03:16:26.100 --> 03:16:28.070 align:middle line:84% and I'm hoping we can get an explanation of it 03:16:28.070 --> 03:16:30.930 align:middle line:90% from its very prolific sponsor. 03:16:30.930 --> 03:16:34.720 align:middle line:84% Senator from Plymouth and Bristol, Mr. Pacheco. 03:16:34.720 --> 03:16:36.820 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Madam President. 03:16:36.820 --> 03:16:45.790 align:middle line:84% As the line-item explanation in the text shows, 03:16:45.790 --> 03:16:48.610 align:middle line:84% this is for outreach and education for the Taunton 03:16:48.610 --> 03:16:52.000 align:middle line:90% opioid task force community. 03:16:52.000 --> 03:16:55.720 align:middle line:84% They're working on a pilot program in the region. 03:16:55.720 --> 03:16:58.050 align:middle line:84% As you know, Taunton was very hard-hit 03:16:58.050 --> 03:17:00.460 align:middle line:84% early on with the opioid crisis, what's 03:17:00.460 --> 03:17:03.310 align:middle line:84% happening with fentanyl, what's happening 03:17:03.310 --> 03:17:08.740 align:middle line:84% with this new drug called "pink" that's out there. 03:17:08.740 --> 03:17:11.170 align:middle line:84% The number of suicides that we've had 03:17:11.170 --> 03:17:13.020 align:middle line:90% has been truly tragic. 03:17:13.020 --> 03:17:17.090 align:middle line:84% So the task force has been doing some great work in education 03:17:17.090 --> 03:17:20.830 align:middle line:84% and outreach, not only in Taunton itself 03:17:20.830 --> 03:17:23.230 align:middle line:90% but in the Taunton region. 03:17:23.230 --> 03:17:28.590 align:middle line:84% So I think this is $50,000 well spent at the local level 03:17:28.590 --> 03:17:36.420 align:middle line:84% to hopefully prevent future problems and overdoses that 03:17:36.420 --> 03:17:39.290 align:middle line:90% take lives. 03:17:39.290 --> 03:17:39.790 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:17:39.790 --> 03:17:42.020 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:17:42.020 --> 03:17:43.220 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:17:43.220 --> 03:17:43.810 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:17:43.810 --> 03:17:47.550 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. 03:17:47.550 --> 03:17:49.300 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 84. 03:17:49.300 --> 03:17:51.520 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, 03:17:51.520 --> 03:17:54.590 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex has filed an amendment, the title 03:17:54.590 --> 03:17:56.350 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:17:56.350 --> 03:18:01.220 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 84 by Ms. Gobi, Dismas House. 03:18:01.220 --> 03:18:03.220 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:18:03.220 --> 03:18:04.410 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:18:04.410 --> 03:18:05.060 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:18:05.060 --> 03:18:07.680 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:18:07.680 --> 03:18:09.910 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 85. 03:18:09.910 --> 03:18:14.120 align:middle line:84% The senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex 03:18:14.120 --> 03:18:15.800 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:18:15.800 --> 03:18:17.920 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:18:17.920 --> 03:18:22.880 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 85 by Mr. Tarr, Dyslexia Screening Procedures. 03:18:22.880 --> 03:18:23.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 03:18:23.380 --> 03:18:26.462 align:middle line:84% The senator from 1st Essex, Mr. Tarr. 03:18:26.462 --> 03:18:28.920 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to the members. 03:18:28.920 --> 03:18:30.600 align:middle line:84% Madam President, one of the things 03:18:30.600 --> 03:18:33.510 align:middle line:84% that we've learned over the last number of years 03:18:33.510 --> 03:18:36.460 align:middle line:84% is how important it is to have effective screening 03:18:36.460 --> 03:18:39.670 align:middle line:84% and intervention early on in a student's career 03:18:39.670 --> 03:18:42.150 align:middle line:84% to be able to address issues that might arise 03:18:42.150 --> 03:18:46.450 align:middle line:84% and issues that may become more complex, more intense, and more 03:18:46.450 --> 03:18:50.260 align:middle line:84% difficult to address as that student gets older. 03:18:50.260 --> 03:18:53.480 align:middle line:84% This amendment, Madam President, is very simple, 03:18:53.480 --> 03:18:55.700 align:middle line:84% in that it requires the Department of Elementary 03:18:55.700 --> 03:19:00.030 align:middle line:84% and Secondary Education to develop and issue guidelines 03:19:00.030 --> 03:19:03.420 align:middle line:84% so that school districts can identify students that 03:19:03.420 --> 03:19:09.020 align:middle line:84% may have dyslexia or other neurological issues or learning 03:19:09.020 --> 03:19:11.500 align:middle line:84% disabilities so that they can be addressed 03:19:11.500 --> 03:19:14.942 align:middle line:84% early on with effective interventions. 03:19:14.942 --> 03:19:16.400 align:middle line:84% So Madam President, there's already 03:19:16.400 --> 03:19:19.420 align:middle line:84% been a lot of discussion in this budget debate about trying 03:19:19.420 --> 03:19:22.230 align:middle line:84% to make investments and to try to do things now 03:19:22.230 --> 03:19:24.500 align:middle line:84% that will save money in the future. 03:19:24.500 --> 03:19:27.410 align:middle line:84% This amendment not only does that 03:19:27.410 --> 03:19:30.810 align:middle line:84% by ensuring that we can address neurological learning 03:19:30.810 --> 03:19:34.410 align:middle line:84% issues earlier on and in a more cost-effective way, 03:19:34.410 --> 03:19:37.050 align:middle line:84% but it also makes sure that students 03:19:37.050 --> 03:19:40.310 align:middle line:84% are getting the interventions that they need so 03:19:40.310 --> 03:19:42.920 align:middle line:84% that their quality of life and that their learning 03:19:42.920 --> 03:19:44.930 align:middle line:90% potential is maximized. 03:19:44.930 --> 03:19:47.600 align:middle line:84% So Madam President, this amendment 03:19:47.600 --> 03:19:49.840 align:middle line:84% would be a very hard one to disagree with. 03:19:49.840 --> 03:19:51.640 align:middle line:90% I suspect no one will. 03:19:51.640 --> 03:19:57.780 align:middle line:84% But I hope, Madam President, that the amendment is adopted. 03:19:57.780 --> 03:20:00.360 align:middle line:84% On the amendment, all those in favor, say aye. 03:20:00.360 --> 03:20:03.850 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no-- oh, I'm sorry. 03:20:03.850 --> 03:20:05.900 align:middle line:90% I apologize. 03:20:05.900 --> 03:20:11.250 align:middle line:84% The senator from 2nd Middlesex, Senator Jehlen. 03:20:11.250 --> 03:20:13.970 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] Madam President. 03:20:13.970 --> 03:20:15.690 align:middle line:90% I didn't hear you recognize me. 03:20:15.690 --> 03:20:17.110 align:middle line:90% She recognized you. 03:20:17.110 --> 03:20:18.530 align:middle line:90% OK, thank you. 03:20:18.530 --> 03:20:21.280 align:middle line:84% I couldn't even hear myself being recognized. 03:20:21.280 --> 03:20:23.810 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:20:23.810 --> 03:20:26.270 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I hope the amendment is not adopted. 03:20:26.270 --> 03:20:28.330 align:middle line:84% This amendment does address an issue 03:20:28.330 --> 03:20:31.990 align:middle line:84% of identifying children as early as 03:20:31.990 --> 03:20:33.940 align:middle line:90% possible who may have dyslexia. 03:20:33.940 --> 03:20:36.160 align:middle line:84% There is a bill before the education committee, 03:20:36.160 --> 03:20:38.460 align:middle line:84% but it is also now being considered 03:20:38.460 --> 03:20:42.330 align:middle line:84% by the early literacy expert panel which it references 03:20:42.330 --> 03:20:44.870 align:middle line:90% in adding a member to that. 03:20:44.870 --> 03:20:48.970 align:middle line:84% That panel is expected to be issuing a report 03:20:48.970 --> 03:20:50.850 align:middle line:90% in the next few months. 03:20:50.850 --> 03:20:54.130 align:middle line:84% And so I ask that we allow them to do their work 03:20:54.130 --> 03:20:56.760 align:middle line:84% and allow the education committee to do its work 03:20:56.760 --> 03:21:01.484 align:middle line:84% and not adopt this particular amendment in the middle 03:21:01.484 --> 03:21:02.400 align:middle line:90% of the budget process. 03:21:02.400 --> 03:21:04.680 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:21:04.680 --> 03:21:06.730 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:21:06.730 --> 03:21:07.980 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:21:07.980 --> 03:21:08.600 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:21:08.600 --> 03:21:11.570 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:21:11.570 --> 03:21:13.370 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 86. 03:21:13.370 --> 03:21:15.796 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Essex and Middlesex 03:21:15.796 --> 03:21:17.170 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:21:17.170 --> 03:21:18.770 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:21:18.770 --> 03:21:19.440 align:middle line:90% Amendment-- 03:21:19.440 --> 03:21:20.520 align:middle line:90% Oh, wait, it's on hold. 03:21:20.520 --> 03:21:24.280 align:middle line:90% It's on hold. 03:21:24.280 --> 03:21:25.560 align:middle line:90% Item number 87. 03:21:25.560 --> 03:21:28.280 align:middle line:84% Senator from Essex and Middlesex, Senator Tarr, 03:21:28.280 --> 03:21:30.242 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:21:30.242 --> 03:21:31.450 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:21:31.450 --> 03:21:35.210 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 87 by Mr. Tarr, $40 Minimum Per-Pupil Aid. 03:21:35.210 --> 03:21:38.640 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 03:21:38.640 --> 03:21:40.640 align:middle line:84% Madam President, and through you to the members. 03:21:40.640 --> 03:21:43.500 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I move that the amendment be temporarily held. 03:21:43.500 --> 03:21:47.290 align:middle line:90% 03:21:47.290 --> 03:21:50.400 align:middle line:84% Senator moves that the item be temporarily held. 03:21:50.400 --> 03:21:52.120 align:middle line:90% Item number 88. 03:21:52.120 --> 03:21:54.420 align:middle line:84% The same senator from Essex and Middlesex 03:21:54.420 --> 03:21:56.640 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:21:56.640 --> 03:21:58.810 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:21:58.810 --> 03:22:03.850 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 88 by Mr. Tarr, $50 Minimum Aid Per-Pupil. 03:22:03.850 --> 03:22:05.894 align:middle line:84% The question comes on adoption of the amendment. 03:22:05.894 --> 03:22:07.060 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 03:22:07.060 --> 03:22:07.760 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 03:22:07.760 --> 03:22:10.900 align:middle line:84% The nos have it, and the amendment is not adopted. 03:22:10.900 --> 03:22:14.290 align:middle line:84% The same senator, on a roll, has filed-- 03:22:14.290 --> 03:22:16.680 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 89. 03:22:16.680 --> 03:22:19.690 align:middle line:84% Senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr, 03:22:19.690 --> 03:22:21.460 align:middle line:84% has filed an amendment, the title 03:22:21.460 --> 03:22:23.290 align:middle line:90% of which the clerk will read. 03:22:23.290 --> 03:22:27.670 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 89 by Mr. Tarr, Unfunded Education Mandates. 03:22:27.670 --> 03:22:30.560 align:middle line:84% Yes, so senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 03:22:30.560 --> 03:22:31.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:22:31.850 --> 03:22:33.266 align:middle line:84% Madam President, one of the things 03:22:33.266 --> 03:22:35.120 align:middle line:84% that I know we all hear whenever we 03:22:35.120 --> 03:22:38.110 align:middle line:84% go to meet with school committees or school officials 03:22:38.110 --> 03:22:41.270 align:middle line:84% or educators is about the terrible drain 03:22:41.270 --> 03:22:44.130 align:middle line:84% that unfunded mandates have on their ability 03:22:44.130 --> 03:22:46.700 align:middle line:84% to be able to have the resources to perform 03:22:46.700 --> 03:22:48.950 align:middle line:84% the critical functions that they need to perform 03:22:48.950 --> 03:22:51.000 align:middle line:90% in educating our students. 03:22:51.000 --> 03:22:53.950 align:middle line:84% And so Madam President, lots of times all of us 03:22:53.950 --> 03:22:55.870 align:middle line:84% will have those conversations, and we'll say, 03:22:55.870 --> 03:22:56.810 align:middle line:90% well, give us a list. 03:22:56.810 --> 03:22:58.300 align:middle line:90% What are the unfunded mandates? 03:22:58.300 --> 03:23:00.080 align:middle line:90% What are the specific problems? 03:23:00.080 --> 03:23:04.550 align:middle line:84% And sometimes it's difficult to assimilate one of those lists. 03:23:04.550 --> 03:23:06.600 align:middle line:84% So rather than put all of those things 03:23:06.600 --> 03:23:08.990 align:middle line:84% into a single amendment, Madam President, 03:23:08.990 --> 03:23:12.100 align:middle line:84% the specific amendment, or the pending amendment, 03:23:12.100 --> 03:23:14.900 align:middle line:84% requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary 03:23:14.900 --> 03:23:17.760 align:middle line:84% Education to be able to hear appeals 03:23:17.760 --> 03:23:19.940 align:middle line:90% about specific mandates-- 03:23:19.940 --> 03:23:24.350 align:middle line:84% and if they are found to be not productive, or not necessary, 03:23:24.350 --> 03:23:27.830 align:middle line:84% to be able to give a waiver so that those mandates 03:23:27.830 --> 03:23:29.350 align:middle line:90% don't need to be complied with. 03:23:29.350 --> 03:23:32.460 align:middle line:84% But if and only if the department 03:23:32.460 --> 03:23:38.440 align:middle line:84% also determines that the quality of education will not be lower. 03:23:38.440 --> 03:23:42.280 align:middle line:84% So Madam President, if you want us to move forward 03:23:42.280 --> 03:23:44.500 align:middle line:84% and to say that we should have a process-- 03:23:44.500 --> 03:23:48.200 align:middle line:84% just a process-- so that unfunded mandates can be 03:23:48.200 --> 03:23:52.680 align:middle line:84% considered and relief can be at least hoped for-- 03:23:52.680 --> 03:23:55.470 align:middle line:84% then this is an amendment that you should support. 03:23:55.470 --> 03:23:57.290 align:middle line:84% And Madam President, I can already 03:23:57.290 --> 03:24:00.080 align:middle line:84% see that it's generating interest and excitement 03:24:00.080 --> 03:24:02.100 align:middle line:90% in the chamber this afternoon. 03:24:02.100 --> 03:24:05.620 align:middle line:84% And I welcome that interest and excitement, because Madam 03:24:05.620 --> 03:24:08.900 align:middle line:84% President, this is an area that we often talk about 03:24:08.900 --> 03:24:10.780 align:middle line:90% and we seldom act on. 03:24:10.780 --> 03:24:14.280 align:middle line:84% This is an opportunity to take important action, 03:24:14.280 --> 03:24:17.110 align:middle line:84% and I hope that the amendment is adopted. 03:24:17.110 --> 03:24:18.231 align:middle line:90% Senator O'Connor Ives. 03:24:18.231 --> 03:24:18.730 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:24:18.730 --> 03:24:23.960 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to the members. 03:24:23.960 --> 03:24:26.010 align:middle line:84% I want to also seize this opportunity 03:24:26.010 --> 03:24:29.290 align:middle line:84% and vocalize my support for this amendment that specifically 03:24:29.290 --> 03:24:32.580 align:middle line:84% looks at unfunded mandates in the area of education. 03:24:32.580 --> 03:24:35.750 align:middle line:84% Because we know, through speaking to our educators 03:24:35.750 --> 03:24:38.600 align:middle line:84% and administrators, that it's the children that ultimately 03:24:38.600 --> 03:24:42.550 align:middle line:84% suffer when our professionals in the education sector 03:24:42.550 --> 03:24:45.610 align:middle line:84% are forced to push paper and do reporting that 03:24:45.610 --> 03:24:49.440 align:middle line:84% have very little to do with educating our young people. 03:24:49.440 --> 03:24:51.550 align:middle line:84% So I think this is a common-sense amendment. 03:24:51.550 --> 03:24:54.150 align:middle line:84% It asks only for those unfunded mandates 03:24:54.150 --> 03:24:56.950 align:middle line:84% to be considered that would not impact education. 03:24:56.950 --> 03:24:59.010 align:middle line:84% And I think the Senate should go on the record 03:24:59.010 --> 03:25:02.660 align:middle line:84% as saying we hear our local officials and their desire 03:25:02.660 --> 03:25:04.630 align:middle line:84% to have quality public education, 03:25:04.630 --> 03:25:07.770 align:middle line:84% but they can't do it in the face of these unfunded mandates. 03:25:07.770 --> 03:25:09.140 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:25:09.140 --> 03:25:10.100 align:middle line:90% Very much. 03:25:10.100 --> 03:25:13.670 align:middle line:84% Senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire, and Middlesex. 03:25:13.670 --> 03:25:15.056 align:middle line:90% Senator? 03:25:15.056 --> 03:25:16.180 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:25:16.180 --> 03:25:20.630 align:middle line:84% I also want to add my voice in support of this amendment. 03:25:20.630 --> 03:25:23.440 align:middle line:84% As the Senate chair for the Regional Schools Caucus, 03:25:23.440 --> 03:25:25.010 align:middle line:84% in meeting with our superintendents, 03:25:25.010 --> 03:25:27.330 align:middle line:84% this is pretty much one of their number-one-- 03:25:27.330 --> 03:25:30.100 align:middle line:90% or in the top five, I will say-- 03:25:30.100 --> 03:25:32.280 align:middle line:90% for them, issues for them. 03:25:32.280 --> 03:25:34.310 align:middle line:84% We hear it over and over and over again. 03:25:34.310 --> 03:25:36.120 align:middle line:84% And a lot of times, the legislature 03:25:36.120 --> 03:25:38.820 align:middle line:84% takes blame for these unfunded mandates, when in fact it 03:25:38.820 --> 03:25:39.580 align:middle line:90% is [INAUDIBLE]. 03:25:39.580 --> 03:25:43.830 align:middle line:84% And all this is asking is to say, hold back a little bit. 03:25:43.830 --> 03:25:46.020 align:middle line:84% Not that you can't put them in, but maybe 03:25:46.020 --> 03:25:49.220 align:middle line:84% take a step back, and at least to give 03:25:49.220 --> 03:25:51.810 align:middle line:84% our schools a little bit of breathing room, 03:25:51.810 --> 03:25:54.760 align:middle line:84% especially during these very difficult economic times. 03:25:54.760 --> 03:25:56.561 align:middle line:84% So I'm in full support of the amendment. 03:25:56.561 --> 03:25:57.060 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:25:57.060 --> 03:25:59.680 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex 03:25:59.680 --> 03:26:01.570 align:middle line:90% district, Senator Ross. 03:26:01.570 --> 03:26:03.320 align:middle line:84% Thank you very kindly, Madam President. 03:26:03.320 --> 03:26:05.900 align:middle line:84% I too hear from all of my communities 03:26:05.900 --> 03:26:09.020 align:middle line:84% about what unfunded mandates are doing to their budgets. 03:26:09.020 --> 03:26:12.500 align:middle line:84% And many of them have asked me to be a strong voice for them, 03:26:12.500 --> 03:26:14.770 align:middle line:84% and I'm hoping to be able to do that 03:26:14.770 --> 03:26:18.380 align:middle line:84% by encouraging us to bring this up repeatedly in this debate 03:26:18.380 --> 03:26:20.935 align:middle line:84% until we solve the Chapter 70 problem. 03:26:20.935 --> 03:26:24.980 align:middle line:90% 03:26:24.980 --> 03:26:26.510 align:middle line:90% We need to make this a priority. 03:26:26.510 --> 03:26:28.980 align:middle line:84% I hope we can address these issues in the budget debate 03:26:28.980 --> 03:26:29.940 align:middle line:90% as we go forward. 03:26:29.940 --> 03:26:31.660 align:middle line:84% We need an open mind, and we need 03:26:31.660 --> 03:26:33.712 align:middle line:84% to not be afraid to take on these challenges now. 03:26:33.712 --> 03:26:35.420 align:middle line:84% These are things that we need to correct. 03:26:35.420 --> 03:26:36.000 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:26:36.000 --> 03:26:40.760 align:middle line:90% 03:26:40.760 --> 03:26:41.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 03:26:41.840 --> 03:26:47.480 align:middle line:84% Senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr. 03:26:47.480 --> 03:26:49.070 align:middle line:90% I think you can see-- 03:26:49.070 --> 03:26:52.620 align:middle line:84% I think we can see from the flavor of the discussion 03:26:52.620 --> 03:26:55.450 align:middle line:84% here that this is a common issue. 03:26:55.450 --> 03:26:57.630 align:middle line:84% And it's one that begs some relief 03:26:57.630 --> 03:26:58.910 align:middle line:90% and a mechanism for relief. 03:26:58.910 --> 03:27:01.300 align:middle line:84% And again, I would point out that this is not 03:27:01.300 --> 03:27:05.270 align:middle line:84% an amendment that outright repeals a number of mandates. 03:27:05.270 --> 03:27:07.660 align:middle line:84% It gives the Department of Elementary and Secondary 03:27:07.660 --> 03:27:10.390 align:middle line:84% Education the opportunity to consider them 03:27:10.390 --> 03:27:13.520 align:middle line:84% and to weigh them, and if they are found on a case 03:27:13.520 --> 03:27:16.420 align:middle line:84% by case basis to not be effective 03:27:16.420 --> 03:27:18.810 align:middle line:84% and to compromise the quality of education 03:27:18.810 --> 03:27:22.060 align:middle line:84% in a particular community or a particular school district, 03:27:22.060 --> 03:27:25.380 align:middle line:84% gives them the opportunity to offer a waiver. 03:27:25.380 --> 03:27:27.380 align:middle line:90% Madam President? 03:27:27.380 --> 03:27:28.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 03:27:28.000 --> 03:27:30.597 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I'm having difficulty 03:27:30.597 --> 03:27:32.180 align:middle line:84% hearing the gentleman from Gloucester. 03:27:32.180 --> 03:27:34.160 align:middle line:84% Yes, the senator from Plymouth and Norfolk 03:27:34.160 --> 03:27:35.630 align:middle line:90% is having difficulty hearing. 03:27:35.630 --> 03:27:39.400 align:middle line:84% So if everybody could take their speeches outside, 03:27:39.400 --> 03:27:40.260 align:middle line:90% that would be great. 03:27:40.260 --> 03:27:44.170 align:middle line:84% Yes, please, Senator Tarr from Essex and Middlesex. 03:27:44.170 --> 03:27:45.490 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 03:27:45.490 --> 03:27:47.510 align:middle line:84% It's seldom that the complaint is 03:27:47.510 --> 03:27:49.130 align:middle line:90% received that I can't be heard. 03:27:49.130 --> 03:27:50.629 align:middle line:84% But I do appreciate the gentlelady 03:27:50.629 --> 03:27:52.420 align:middle line:84% for calling the Senate's attention to this, 03:27:52.420 --> 03:27:54.170 align:middle line:84% because this is a critical matter. 03:27:54.170 --> 03:27:56.530 align:middle line:84% It is one that is of a recurring nature. 03:27:56.530 --> 03:27:59.670 align:middle line:84% And it is one that begs a form of solution. 03:27:59.670 --> 03:28:02.000 align:middle line:90% And this is a way to address it. 03:28:02.000 --> 03:28:03.760 align:middle line:84% Now, Madam President, I know in the past 03:28:03.760 --> 03:28:06.574 align:middle line:84% there have been a number of studies and a number of ways 03:28:06.574 --> 03:28:07.240 align:middle line:90% to look at this. 03:28:07.240 --> 03:28:08.940 align:middle line:84% But they have not been conclusive, 03:28:08.940 --> 03:28:11.220 align:middle line:84% and they have not delivered the kind of results 03:28:11.220 --> 03:28:13.510 align:middle line:84% that our school districts could hope for. 03:28:13.510 --> 03:28:16.820 align:middle line:84% And so Madam President, I would hope 03:28:16.820 --> 03:28:19.640 align:middle line:84% that we would all be unanimous in our support 03:28:19.640 --> 03:28:21.610 align:middle line:84% of this particular amendment, because we all 03:28:21.610 --> 03:28:22.920 align:middle line:90% recognize the problem. 03:28:22.920 --> 03:28:24.850 align:middle line:84% We all want to do something about it. 03:28:24.850 --> 03:28:26.600 align:middle line:84% And as a result of that, in order 03:28:26.600 --> 03:28:29.980 align:middle line:84% to also be able to express our support, 03:28:29.980 --> 03:28:31.980 align:middle line:84% I move that when a vote is taken on this matter, 03:28:31.980 --> 03:28:34.590 align:middle line:84% it be taken by a call of the yeas and nays. 03:28:34.590 --> 03:28:37.060 align:middle line:90% The senator from Middlesex-- 03:28:37.060 --> 03:28:40.600 align:middle line:84% senator from Essex and Middlesex has 03:28:40.600 --> 03:28:42.110 align:middle line:84% asked that when a vote is taken, it 03:28:42.110 --> 03:28:44.030 align:middle line:84% be taken by call of the yeas and nos. 03:28:44.030 --> 03:28:46.840 align:middle line:84% Those members joining with him, rise and be counted. 03:28:46.840 --> 03:28:49.860 align:middle line:90% 03:28:49.860 --> 03:28:50.470 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 03:28:50.470 --> 03:28:53.380 align:middle line:84% The Senate will be in a brief recess. 03:28:53.380 --> 03:29:00.032 align:middle line:90%