WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:14.750 align:middle line:90% 00:00:14.750 --> 00:00:15.860 align:middle line:90% Senate will come to order. 00:00:15.860 --> 00:00:18.680 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:00:18.680 --> 00:00:22.010 align:middle line:84% Item 4512-0500 contained in section two 00:00:22.010 --> 00:00:24.382 align:middle line:84% relative to the Division of Dental Health Administration 00:00:24.382 --> 00:00:26.090 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:00:26.090 --> 00:00:28.079 align:middle line:84% that the House has passed this item 00:00:28.079 --> 00:00:29.870 align:middle line:84% notwithstanding the reduction in objections 00:00:29.870 --> 00:00:32.950 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 123 to 32. 00:00:32.950 --> 00:00:35.120 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:37.310 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 00:00:37.310 --> 00:00:39.650 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 00:00:39.650 --> 00:00:44.510 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, Mr. deMacedo. 00:00:44.510 --> 00:00:45.680 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:00:45.680 --> 00:00:49.400 align:middle line:84% And again I rise before the body to get 00:00:49.400 --> 00:00:54.710 align:middle line:84% an explanation in regards to item 4512-0500 titled 00:00:54.710 --> 00:00:56.610 align:middle line:90% Dental Health Services. 00:00:56.610 --> 00:01:00.100 align:middle line:84% Again, this was a reduction of $150,000. 00:01:00.100 --> 00:01:02.030 align:middle line:84% Might the gentlelady from Salem give us 00:01:02.030 --> 00:01:05.930 align:middle line:84% an explanation of what this particular override does? 00:01:05.930 --> 00:01:08.766 align:middle line:90% From 2nd Essex, Miss Lovely. 00:01:08.766 --> 00:01:09.890 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:01:09.890 --> 00:01:13.250 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce Forsyth dental health program for kids 00:01:13.250 --> 00:01:16.490 align:middle line:90% by $150,000. 00:01:16.490 --> 00:01:19.070 align:middle line:84% ForsythKids provides preventative dental care 00:01:19.070 --> 00:01:21.620 align:middle line:84% to Massachusetts children of all ages in participating 00:01:21.620 --> 00:01:23.870 align:middle line:90% schools or eligible locations. 00:01:23.870 --> 00:01:26.690 align:middle line:84% These include on-site dental examinations, oral health 00:01:26.690 --> 00:01:29.930 align:middle line:84% education, and services such as dental cleaning, application 00:01:29.930 --> 00:01:32.700 align:middle line:84% of fluoride, and sealants to prevent decay. 00:01:32.700 --> 00:01:35.340 align:middle line:84% Oral health condition is closely tied to overall health, 00:01:35.340 --> 00:01:37.550 align:middle line:84% can serve as an important indicator. 00:01:37.550 --> 00:01:39.960 align:middle line:84% By improving and increasing access to oral health, 00:01:39.960 --> 00:01:43.140 align:middle line:84% particularly to vulnerable and underserved populations, 00:01:43.140 --> 00:01:45.830 align:middle line:84% we are making strides in improving quality of life 00:01:45.830 --> 00:01:49.067 align:middle line:84% and overall being of health of individuals. 00:01:49.067 --> 00:01:50.900 align:middle line:84% Therefore I ask that you overturn this veto. 00:01:50.900 --> 00:01:51.860 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:01:51.860 --> 00:01:53.638 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 00:01:53.638 --> 00:01:56.132 align:middle line:90% Roll call! 00:01:56.132 --> 00:01:56.632 align:middle line:90% 49. 00:01:56.632 --> 00:01:59.626 align:middle line:90% 00:01:59.626 --> 00:02:02.620 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 00:02:02.620 --> 00:02:03.620 align:middle line:90% Yeah! 00:02:03.620 --> 00:02:05.968 align:middle line:84% Boncore-- I'm sorry, Barrett yes. 00:02:05.968 --> 00:02:06.468 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:02:06.468 --> 00:02:07.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:07.340 --> 00:02:07.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:07.990 --> 00:02:08.490 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:02:08.490 --> 00:02:08.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:08.990 --> 00:02:09.760 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:02:09.760 --> 00:02:10.259 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:10.259 --> 00:02:10.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:10.770 --> 00:02:11.550 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:02:11.550 --> 00:02:12.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:12.220 --> 00:02:12.770 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:02:12.770 --> 00:02:13.540 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:13.540 --> 00:02:14.417 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:14.417 --> 00:02:15.200 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:15.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:15.700 --> 00:02:16.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:16.540 --> 00:02:17.040 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:02:17.040 --> 00:02:17.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:17.540 --> 00:02:18.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:19.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:19.380 --> 00:02:20.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:20.780 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:02:20.780 --> 00:02:21.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:21.420 --> 00:02:21.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:21.920 --> 00:02:22.540 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:02:22.540 --> 00:02:23.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:23.040 --> 00:02:23.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:23.610 --> 00:02:26.216 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:02:26.216 --> 00:02:27.700 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:27.700 --> 00:02:28.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:28.690 --> 00:02:29.230 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:02:29.230 --> 00:02:29.770 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:29.770 --> 00:02:30.624 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:30.624 --> 00:02:31.124 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:02:31.124 --> 00:02:34.498 align:middle line:90% 00:02:34.498 --> 00:02:35.444 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:35.444 --> 00:02:35.944 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:35.944 --> 00:02:36.890 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:02:36.890 --> 00:02:37.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:37.390 --> 00:02:38.336 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:38.336 --> 00:02:38.836 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:02:38.836 --> 00:02:39.318 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:39.318 --> 00:02:39.818 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:39.818 --> 00:02:40.750 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:02:40.750 --> 00:02:41.250 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:41.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:41.990 --> 00:02:42.600 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:02:42.600 --> 00:02:43.100 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:43.100 --> 00:02:43.890 align:middle line:90% No. 00:02:43.890 --> 00:02:44.660 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:02:44.660 --> 00:02:45.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:45.160 --> 00:02:45.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:45.740 --> 00:02:46.240 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:46.671 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:46.671 --> 00:02:47.171 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:47.171 --> 00:02:47.964 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:02:47.964 --> 00:02:48.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:48.830 --> 00:02:49.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:49.830 --> 00:02:50.330 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:02:50.330 --> 00:02:50.830 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:50.830 --> 00:02:51.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:51.330 --> 00:02:51.830 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:02:51.830 --> 00:02:52.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:52.330 --> 00:02:52.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:52.830 --> 00:02:53.330 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:02:53.330 --> 00:02:53.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:53.830 --> 00:02:54.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:54.330 --> 00:02:55.322 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:02:55.322 --> 00:02:55.822 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:55.822 --> 00:02:56.322 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:56.322 --> 00:02:57.314 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:02:57.314 --> 00:02:57.814 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:02:57.814 --> 00:02:58.314 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:02:58.314 --> 00:02:59.308 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:02:59.308 --> 00:03:00.302 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:00.302 --> 00:03:00.802 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:00.802 --> 00:03:01.798 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:03:01.798 --> 00:03:02.792 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:02.792 --> 00:03:03.292 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:03.292 --> 00:03:04.784 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:03:04.784 --> 00:03:05.284 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:05.284 --> 00:03:05.782 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:05.782 --> 00:03:06.280 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:06.778 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:06.778 --> 00:03:07.278 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:07.278 --> 00:03:08.272 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:03:08.272 --> 00:03:09.268 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:09.268 --> 00:03:09.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:09.780 --> 00:03:10.590 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:03:10.590 --> 00:03:11.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:11.090 --> 00:03:11.886 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:11.886 --> 00:03:12.500 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:03:12.500 --> 00:03:13.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:13.000 --> 00:03:13.408 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:13.408 --> 00:03:13.908 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:03:13.908 --> 00:03:16.501 align:middle line:90% 00:03:16.501 --> 00:03:17.001 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:17.001 --> 00:03:17.501 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:17.501 --> 00:03:18.940 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:03:18.940 --> 00:03:19.440 align:middle line:90% Yep. 00:03:19.440 --> 00:03:19.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:19.950 --> 00:03:20.450 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:03:20.450 --> 00:03:21.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:21.390 --> 00:03:21.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:21.950 --> 00:03:22.744 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:03:22.744 --> 00:03:23.244 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:23.244 --> 00:03:24.218 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:03:24.218 --> 00:03:26.166 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:03:26.166 --> 00:03:33.490 align:middle line:90% 00:03:33.490 --> 00:03:35.420 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 34 members having 00:03:35.420 --> 00:03:37.130 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, three members 00:03:37.130 --> 00:03:39.740 align:middle line:84% having voted in the negative, the item passes. 00:03:39.740 --> 00:03:41.990 align:middle line:84% Notwithstanding the objections of the governor, 00:03:41.990 --> 00:03:45.003 align:middle line:84% two thirds of the members having voted in the affirmative. 00:03:45.003 --> 00:03:55.356 align:middle line:90% 00:03:55.356 --> 00:03:58.807 align:middle line:84% OK, has this got paper from the House? 00:03:58.807 --> 00:04:01.770 align:middle line:90% Paper from the house! 00:04:01.770 --> 00:04:03.420 align:middle line:90% Wait a minute, Madam President. 00:04:03.420 --> 00:04:07.512 align:middle line:84% Item 4513-1002 containing section two of the WIC program 00:04:07.512 --> 00:04:09.220 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:04:09.220 --> 00:04:11.469 align:middle line:84% that this item is passed notwithstanding the reduction 00:04:11.469 --> 00:04:13.860 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 137 to 16. 00:04:13.860 --> 00:04:16.510 align:middle line:90% 00:04:16.510 --> 00:04:18.160 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:20.950 align:middle line:84% shall the item pass notwithstanding the objections 00:04:20.950 --> 00:04:23.280 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 00:04:23.280 --> 00:04:26.740 align:middle line:84% The gentleman senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, 00:04:26.740 --> 00:04:28.840 align:middle line:90% mister deMacedo. 00:04:28.840 --> 00:04:31.240 align:middle line:84% Hello Madam President, welcome to the rostrum. 00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:33.730 align:middle line:90% We appreciate your work. 00:04:33.730 --> 00:04:37.090 align:middle line:84% I am here to rise to ask a question in regards 00:04:37.090 --> 00:04:43.570 align:middle line:90% to, again, line item 4513-1002. 00:04:43.570 --> 00:04:49.300 align:middle line:84% Again, this is a reduction of $17,000 out of an $11,869,000 00:04:49.300 --> 00:04:50.290 align:middle line:90% line item. 00:04:50.290 --> 00:04:52.810 align:middle line:84% I was wondering what the rationale 00:04:52.810 --> 00:04:55.240 align:middle line:84% might be in regards to overriding the governor's 00:04:55.240 --> 00:04:56.140 align:middle line:90% veto on this one. 00:04:56.140 --> 00:04:57.130 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 00:04:57.130 --> 00:04:57.660 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:04:57.660 --> 00:05:01.870 align:middle line:84% So The gentlelady from Essex, senator Lovely? 00:05:01.870 --> 00:05:03.400 align:middle line:90% Thank you Madam President. 00:05:03.400 --> 00:05:05.980 align:middle line:84% The Women, Infants and Children WIC program 00:05:05.980 --> 00:05:08.820 align:middle line:84% provides nutrition, education, counseling, 00:05:08.820 --> 00:05:11.640 align:middle line:84% and makes health care and social service referrals, 00:05:11.640 --> 00:05:13.230 align:middle line:84% distributes checks for healthy foods 00:05:13.230 --> 00:05:16.510 align:middle line:84% to low income, moderate income, to low and moderate income 00:05:16.510 --> 00:05:18.970 align:middle line:84% pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum women 00:05:18.970 --> 00:05:21.070 align:middle line:84% as well as infants and children up 00:05:21.070 --> 00:05:23.860 align:middle line:84% to the age of five certified as medically 00:05:23.860 --> 00:05:26.110 align:middle line:90% or nutritionally at risk. 00:05:26.110 --> 00:05:29.470 align:middle line:84% WIC participants also receive coupons 00:05:29.470 --> 00:05:34.930 align:middle line:84% redeemable at community farmer's markets for for fresh produce. 00:05:34.930 --> 00:05:38.830 align:middle line:84% It's important we include full funding for this program 00:05:38.830 --> 00:05:42.310 align:middle line:84% in order to increase access to health services 00:05:42.310 --> 00:05:46.060 align:middle line:84% and ensure the well-being of women, infants, and children 00:05:46.060 --> 00:05:48.590 align:middle line:90% who are at nutrition risk. 00:05:48.590 --> 00:05:50.820 align:middle line:84% Therefore I ask that you overturn this veto. 00:05:50.820 --> 00:05:53.080 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:05:53.080 --> 00:05:55.300 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:05:55.300 --> 00:05:56.890 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:05:56.890 --> 00:05:57.390 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 00:05:57.390 --> 00:06:00.816 align:middle line:90% 00:06:00.816 --> 00:06:01.808 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:06:01.808 --> 00:06:02.796 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:02.796 --> 00:06:03.296 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:03.296 --> 00:06:04.284 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:06:04.284 --> 00:06:04.784 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:04.784 --> 00:06:05.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:05.780 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:06:05.780 --> 00:06:08.752 align:middle line:90% 00:06:08.752 --> 00:06:09.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:09.550 --> 00:06:10.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:10.050 --> 00:06:10.890 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:06:10.890 --> 00:06:11.411 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:11.411 --> 00:06:11.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:11.910 --> 00:06:12.417 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:06:12.417 --> 00:06:12.917 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:12.917 --> 00:06:13.417 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:13.417 --> 00:06:15.402 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:06:15.402 --> 00:06:16.893 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:06:16.893 --> 00:06:17.884 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:17.884 --> 00:06:18.384 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:06:18.384 --> 00:06:18.881 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:18.881 --> 00:06:19.378 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:19.378 --> 00:06:19.875 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:06:19.875 --> 00:06:20.375 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:20.375 --> 00:06:21.363 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 00:06:21.363 --> 00:06:21.863 align:middle line:90% No. 00:06:21.863 --> 00:06:22.363 align:middle line:90% No. 00:06:22.363 --> 00:06:25.342 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:06:25.342 --> 00:06:26.336 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:26.336 --> 00:06:27.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:27.330 --> 00:06:28.820 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:06:28.820 --> 00:06:29.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:29.320 --> 00:06:30.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:30.220 --> 00:06:31.040 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:31.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:31.540 --> 00:06:32.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:32.771 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:06:32.771 --> 00:06:33.270 align:middle line:90% No. 00:06:33.270 --> 00:06:33.860 align:middle line:90% No. 00:06:33.860 --> 00:06:34.731 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:06:34.731 --> 00:06:35.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:35.230 --> 00:06:36.066 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:36.066 --> 00:06:36.565 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:06:36.565 --> 00:06:37.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:37.010 --> 00:06:37.509 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:37.509 --> 00:06:39.341 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:06:39.341 --> 00:06:39.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:39.840 --> 00:06:40.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:40.840 --> 00:06:42.840 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:06:42.840 --> 00:06:44.340 align:middle line:90% Senator Hinds? 00:06:44.340 --> 00:06:45.321 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:06:45.321 --> 00:06:46.283 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:06:46.283 --> 00:06:47.226 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:47.226 --> 00:06:47.726 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:06:47.726 --> 00:06:49.169 align:middle line:90% No. 00:06:49.169 --> 00:06:51.093 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:06:51.093 --> 00:06:52.536 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:52.536 --> 00:06:53.498 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:53.498 --> 00:06:54.441 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:06:54.441 --> 00:06:54.941 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:54.941 --> 00:06:55.441 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:55.441 --> 00:06:56.365 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:06:56.365 --> 00:06:56.865 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:56.865 --> 00:06:57.365 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:57.365 --> 00:06:58.200 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:06:58.200 --> 00:06:59.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:59.030 --> 00:06:59.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:06:59.530 --> 00:07:00.030 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:07:00.030 --> 00:07:00.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:00.950 --> 00:07:01.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:01.450 --> 00:07:02.370 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:07:02.370 --> 00:07:02.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:02.870 --> 00:07:03.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:03.370 --> 00:07:05.720 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:06.574 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:06.574 --> 00:07:07.073 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:07.073 --> 00:07:07.880 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:07:07.880 --> 00:07:08.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:09.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:09.230 --> 00:07:09.730 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:07:09.730 --> 00:07:13.153 align:middle line:90% 00:07:13.153 --> 00:07:14.131 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:07:14.131 --> 00:07:15.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:15.110 --> 00:07:15.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:15.880 --> 00:07:16.380 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:07:16.380 --> 00:07:17.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:17.380 --> 00:07:17.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:17.970 --> 00:07:19.261 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:07:19.261 --> 00:07:19.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:19.760 --> 00:07:20.259 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:20.259 --> 00:07:21.224 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:07:21.224 --> 00:07:21.724 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:21.724 --> 00:07:22.708 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:22.708 --> 00:07:23.684 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:07:23.684 --> 00:07:24.184 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:24.184 --> 00:07:24.684 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:24.684 --> 00:07:25.660 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:07:25.660 --> 00:07:26.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:27.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:27.050 --> 00:07:27.550 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:07:27.550 --> 00:07:28.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:28.050 --> 00:07:28.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:28.840 --> 00:07:29.340 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:07:29.340 --> 00:07:29.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:29.840 --> 00:07:30.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:30.540 --> 00:07:31.040 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:07:31.040 --> 00:07:31.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:31.870 --> 00:07:32.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:33.130 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:07:33.130 --> 00:07:34.121 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:34.121 --> 00:07:34.621 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:34.621 --> 00:07:35.615 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:07:35.615 --> 00:07:36.609 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:36.609 --> 00:07:38.597 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:07:38.597 --> 00:07:40.088 align:middle line:90% Have all members been-- 00:07:40.088 --> 00:07:49.060 align:middle line:90% 00:07:49.060 --> 00:07:50.190 align:middle line:90% 34 in the affirmative-- 00:07:50.190 --> 00:07:51.570 align:middle line:90% Three in the negative. 00:07:51.570 --> 00:07:55.110 align:middle line:84% 34 in the affirmative, three in the negative. 00:07:55.110 --> 00:07:58.030 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection of the governor 00:07:58.030 --> 00:08:01.030 align:middle line:84% two-thirds of the members having voted in the affirmative. 00:08:01.030 --> 00:08:02.740 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:08:02.740 --> 00:08:08.290 align:middle line:84% Item 4313-- 4513-1026 contained in section two relative 00:08:08.290 --> 00:08:11.399 align:middle line:84% to suicide prevention comes from the House with the endorsement 00:08:11.399 --> 00:08:13.690 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 00:08:13.690 --> 00:08:18.240 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 136 to 19. 00:08:18.240 --> 00:08:20.200 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 00:08:20.200 --> 00:08:22.780 align:middle line:84% shall the items pass notwithstanding the objection 00:08:22.780 --> 00:08:25.240 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 00:08:25.240 --> 00:08:29.860 align:middle line:84% The good senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex, Senator Tarr. 00:08:29.860 --> 00:08:31.600 align:middle line:90% Why, thank you, Madam President. 00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:35.470 align:middle line:84% You are doing a spectacular job at the rostrum coming off 00:08:35.470 --> 00:08:38.500 align:middle line:84% the bench late this afternoon, or getting 00:08:38.500 --> 00:08:40.282 align:middle line:90% to be late this afternoon. 00:08:40.282 --> 00:08:42.490 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I'm hoping we can get an explanation 00:08:42.490 --> 00:08:44.049 align:middle line:90% of this particular item. 00:08:44.049 --> 00:08:49.080 align:middle line:84% I believe it's 4513-1026, if I'm not mistaken. 00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:52.150 align:middle line:84% And I see the gentlelady from Salem is prepared to offer it, 00:08:52.150 --> 00:08:53.170 align:middle line:90% which is delightful. 00:08:53.170 --> 00:08:54.850 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:08:54.850 --> 00:08:58.700 align:middle line:84% Yes, the senator from 2nd Essex, senator Lovely. 00:08:58.700 --> 00:08:59.860 align:middle line:90% Thank you Madam President. 00:08:59.860 --> 00:09:02.860 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate $50,000 in the suicide 00:09:02.860 --> 00:09:04.450 align:middle line:90% prevention account. 00:09:04.450 --> 00:09:07.660 align:middle line:84% This funding is for Samaritans Fall River New Bedford 00:09:07.660 --> 00:09:09.850 align:middle line:84% that offers a confidential mental health 00:09:09.850 --> 00:09:12.130 align:middle line:84% and social support call line that 00:09:12.130 --> 00:09:16.300 align:middle line:84% assists individuals and families who are going through crisises 00:09:16.300 --> 00:09:19.240 align:middle line:84% and helping those who may be suicidal. 00:09:19.240 --> 00:09:21.700 align:middle line:84% Although suicide rates are lower in Massachusetts 00:09:21.700 --> 00:09:25.120 align:middle line:84% and nationwide, by offering targeted local resources 00:09:25.120 --> 00:09:27.760 align:middle line:84% 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 00:09:27.760 --> 00:09:29.920 align:middle line:84% we're ensuring that individuals are always 00:09:29.920 --> 00:09:31.600 align:middle line:90% able to reach someone. 00:09:31.600 --> 00:09:33.310 align:middle line:84% It's essential that we invest in programs 00:09:33.310 --> 00:09:36.070 align:middle line:84% that offer lifesaving compassionate services 00:09:36.070 --> 00:09:38.740 align:middle line:84% to individuals who have suicidal thoughts. 00:09:38.740 --> 00:09:41.060 align:middle line:84% Therefore, I ask that you overturn this veto. 00:09:41.060 --> 00:09:42.940 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:09:42.940 --> 00:09:44.332 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:09:44.332 --> 00:09:50.236 align:middle line:90% 00:09:50.236 --> 00:09:51.220 align:middle line:90% Sorry! 00:09:51.220 --> 00:09:52.590 align:middle line:90% We're calling a roll. 00:09:52.590 --> 00:09:55.560 align:middle line:84% Will everybody take their conversations out of the room 00:09:55.560 --> 00:09:57.930 align:middle line:84% so people can hear their name being called? 00:09:57.930 --> 00:09:59.000 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:09:59.000 --> 00:09:59.783 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 00:09:59.783 --> 00:10:00.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:00.610 --> 00:10:01.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:01.340 --> 00:10:02.140 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:10:02.140 --> 00:10:02.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:02.640 --> 00:10:03.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:03.060 --> 00:10:03.546 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:10:03.546 --> 00:10:04.032 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:04.032 --> 00:10:04.532 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:04.532 --> 00:10:05.476 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:10:05.476 --> 00:10:05.976 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:05.976 --> 00:10:06.948 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:06.948 --> 00:10:09.378 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:10:09.378 --> 00:10:10.350 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:10:10.350 --> 00:10:11.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:11.330 --> 00:10:12.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:12.050 --> 00:10:12.968 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:10:12.968 --> 00:10:13.468 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:13.468 --> 00:10:13.952 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:13.952 --> 00:10:14.452 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:10:14.452 --> 00:10:15.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:15.390 --> 00:10:15.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:15.890 --> 00:10:16.390 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:10:16.390 --> 00:10:17.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:17.040 --> 00:10:19.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 00:10:19.580 --> 00:10:20.080 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:20.080 --> 00:10:20.876 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:20.876 --> 00:10:22.040 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:10:22.040 --> 00:10:22.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:22.540 --> 00:10:23.492 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:23.492 --> 00:10:24.141 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:10:24.141 --> 00:10:24.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:24.640 --> 00:10:25.558 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:25.558 --> 00:10:27.022 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:10:27.022 --> 00:10:29.462 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:10:29.462 --> 00:10:30.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:31.203 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:31.203 --> 00:10:31.702 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:10:31.702 --> 00:10:32.100 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:32.100 --> 00:10:32.670 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:32.670 --> 00:10:34.321 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:10:34.321 --> 00:10:34.821 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:34.821 --> 00:10:35.321 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:35.321 --> 00:10:36.282 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:10:36.282 --> 00:10:37.256 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:37.256 --> 00:10:38.217 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:38.217 --> 00:10:38.717 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:10:38.717 --> 00:10:39.204 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:39.204 --> 00:10:39.704 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:39.704 --> 00:10:40.652 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:10:40.652 --> 00:10:41.152 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:41.152 --> 00:10:41.639 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:41.639 --> 00:10:42.126 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:10:42.126 --> 00:10:42.626 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:42.626 --> 00:10:44.074 align:middle line:90% No. 00:10:44.074 --> 00:10:45.035 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:10:45.035 --> 00:10:45.535 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:45.535 --> 00:10:46.509 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:46.509 --> 00:10:47.470 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:10:47.470 --> 00:10:47.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:47.970 --> 00:10:48.457 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:48.457 --> 00:10:48.944 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:10:48.944 --> 00:10:49.431 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:49.431 --> 00:10:49.931 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:49.931 --> 00:10:51.460 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:10:51.460 --> 00:10:51.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:51.960 --> 00:10:52.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:53.460 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:10:53.460 --> 00:10:53.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:54.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:10:54.460 --> 00:10:56.932 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:10:56.932 --> 00:10:58.876 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:10:58.876 --> 00:10:59.834 align:middle line:90% Yes for me! 00:10:59.834 --> 00:11:00.334 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:00.334 --> 00:11:00.820 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:11:00.820 --> 00:11:01.306 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:01.306 --> 00:11:01.806 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:01.806 --> 00:11:02.756 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:11:02.756 --> 00:11:03.256 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:03.256 --> 00:11:03.739 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:03.739 --> 00:11:04.239 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:11:04.239 --> 00:11:05.171 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:05.171 --> 00:11:05.671 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:05.671 --> 00:11:08.069 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:11:08.069 --> 00:11:08.569 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:08.569 --> 00:11:09.535 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:09.535 --> 00:11:10.967 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:11:10.967 --> 00:11:11.467 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:11.467 --> 00:11:11.967 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:11.967 --> 00:11:14.376 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:11:14.376 --> 00:11:15.348 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:11:15.348 --> 00:11:16.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:16.320 --> 00:11:16.852 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:16.852 --> 00:11:17.352 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:11:17.352 --> 00:11:17.834 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:17.834 --> 00:11:18.334 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:18.334 --> 00:11:19.744 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:11:19.744 --> 00:11:20.244 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:20.244 --> 00:11:20.744 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:20.744 --> 00:11:21.672 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:11:21.672 --> 00:11:22.172 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:22.172 --> 00:11:22.672 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:22.672 --> 00:11:23.600 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:11:23.600 --> 00:11:24.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:24.100 --> 00:11:24.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:24.600 --> 00:11:26.992 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:11:26.992 --> 00:11:27.956 align:middle line:90% No. 00:11:27.956 --> 00:11:28.460 align:middle line:90% No. 00:11:28.460 --> 00:11:28.960 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:29.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:29.840 --> 00:11:30.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:30.530 --> 00:11:31.029 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:11:31.029 --> 00:11:31.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:31.800 --> 00:11:33.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:11:33.780 --> 00:11:35.760 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:11:35.760 --> 00:11:37.245 align:middle line:90% I believe they have. 00:11:37.245 --> 00:11:42.690 align:middle line:90% 00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:46.500 align:middle line:84% 32 in the affirmative, five in the negative. 00:11:46.500 --> 00:11:50.730 align:middle line:84% All The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:11:50.730 --> 00:11:54.510 align:middle line:84% of the governor two thirds of the members having 00:11:54.510 --> 00:11:55.770 align:middle line:90% voted in the affirmative. 00:11:55.770 --> 00:11:57.420 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:11:57.420 --> 00:12:01.680 align:middle line:84% Item 4513-1111 contained in section two 00:12:01.680 --> 00:12:04.612 align:middle line:84% relative to health promotion and disease prevention 00:12:04.612 --> 00:12:06.320 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:09.410 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the reduction 00:12:09.410 --> 00:12:14.210 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 125 to 28. 00:12:14.210 --> 00:12:16.640 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:12:16.640 --> 00:12:19.100 align:middle line:84% --pass notwithstanding the objection of the government 00:12:19.100 --> 00:12:20.260 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 00:12:20.260 --> 00:12:21.840 align:middle line:84% And the clerk will call the roll. 00:12:21.840 --> 00:12:26.740 align:middle line:90% 00:12:26.740 --> 00:12:27.720 align:middle line:90% Roll call. 00:12:27.720 --> 00:12:30.170 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:12:30.170 --> 00:12:30.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:30.670 --> 00:12:31.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:31.300 --> 00:12:33.101 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:12:33.101 --> 00:12:33.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:33.600 --> 00:12:34.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:34.220 --> 00:12:34.980 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:12:34.980 --> 00:12:35.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:36.069 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:36.069 --> 00:12:36.610 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:12:36.610 --> 00:12:37.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:37.110 --> 00:12:37.642 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:37.642 --> 00:12:38.142 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:12:38.142 --> 00:12:38.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:38.520 --> 00:12:39.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:39.020 --> 00:12:40.960 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:12:40.960 --> 00:12:42.920 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:12:42.920 --> 00:12:43.890 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:43.890 --> 00:12:44.390 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:44.390 --> 00:12:45.370 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:12:45.370 --> 00:12:45.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:45.870 --> 00:12:46.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:46.350 --> 00:12:46.810 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:12:46.810 --> 00:12:47.309 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:47.309 --> 00:12:47.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:47.890 --> 00:12:48.389 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:12:48.389 --> 00:12:48.970 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:48.970 --> 00:12:49.580 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:49.580 --> 00:12:50.130 align:middle line:90% Didomenico? 00:12:50.130 --> 00:12:50.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:50.670 --> 00:12:51.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:51.170 --> 00:12:51.750 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:12:51.750 --> 00:12:52.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:52.340 --> 00:12:52.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:52.840 --> 00:12:54.612 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:12:54.612 --> 00:12:55.460 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:12:55.460 --> 00:12:56.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:56.450 --> 00:12:57.330 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:12:57.330 --> 00:12:57.830 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:57.830 --> 00:12:58.672 align:middle line:90% No. 00:12:58.672 --> 00:12:59.172 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:12:59.172 --> 00:12:59.672 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:12:59.672 --> 00:13:00.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:00.290 --> 00:13:01.240 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:13:01.240 --> 00:13:01.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:01.740 --> 00:13:02.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:02.240 --> 00:13:03.101 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:13:03.101 --> 00:13:03.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:04.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:04.100 --> 00:13:04.710 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:13:04.710 --> 00:13:05.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:05.210 --> 00:13:05.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:05.680 --> 00:13:06.180 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:13:06.180 --> 00:13:09.420 align:middle line:90% 00:13:09.420 --> 00:13:10.323 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:13:10.323 --> 00:13:11.210 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:13:11.210 --> 00:13:11.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:11.780 --> 00:13:12.670 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:13:12.670 --> 00:13:13.169 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:13.169 --> 00:13:13.668 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:13.668 --> 00:13:15.021 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:13:15.021 --> 00:13:15.901 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:15.901 --> 00:13:16.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:16.400 --> 00:13:17.290 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:13:17.290 --> 00:13:17.925 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:17.925 --> 00:13:18.425 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:18.425 --> 00:13:19.270 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:13:19.270 --> 00:13:20.101 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:20.101 --> 00:13:20.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:20.600 --> 00:13:21.140 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:13:21.140 --> 00:13:21.811 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:21.811 --> 00:13:22.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:22.310 --> 00:13:23.090 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:13:23.090 --> 00:13:23.761 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:23.761 --> 00:13:24.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:24.260 --> 00:13:25.010 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:13:25.010 --> 00:13:25.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:25.770 --> 00:13:26.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:26.270 --> 00:13:27.690 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:13:27.690 --> 00:13:28.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:28.190 --> 00:13:28.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:28.670 --> 00:13:29.170 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:13:29.170 --> 00:13:30.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:30.030 --> 00:13:30.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:30.530 --> 00:13:31.354 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:13:31.354 --> 00:13:32.131 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:32.131 --> 00:13:32.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:32.630 --> 00:13:33.683 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:13:33.683 --> 00:13:34.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:34.500 --> 00:13:35.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:35.750 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:13:35.750 --> 00:13:36.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:36.470 --> 00:13:37.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:37.050 --> 00:13:38.167 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:13:38.167 --> 00:13:39.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:39.240 --> 00:13:39.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:39.740 --> 00:13:40.280 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:13:40.280 --> 00:13:41.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:41.260 --> 00:13:41.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:41.790 --> 00:13:42.010 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:13:42.010 --> 00:13:42.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:42.510 --> 00:13:43.471 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:43.471 --> 00:13:45.906 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:13:45.906 --> 00:13:47.367 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:47.367 --> 00:13:48.328 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:48.328 --> 00:13:48.828 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:13:48.828 --> 00:13:49.789 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:49.789 --> 00:13:50.289 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:50.289 --> 00:13:51.250 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:13:51.250 --> 00:13:51.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:51.750 --> 00:13:53.211 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:13:53.211 --> 00:13:54.672 align:middle line:90% Have all members been-- 00:13:54.672 --> 00:13:58.100 align:middle line:90% 00:13:58.100 --> 00:14:00.530 align:middle line:84% Senator from 2nd Hampden and Hampshire. 00:14:00.530 --> 00:14:02.020 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:14:02.020 --> 00:14:03.085 align:middle line:90% He has not. 00:14:03.085 --> 00:14:05.510 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] reporting in the affirmative. 00:14:05.510 --> 00:14:06.620 align:middle line:90% Humason votes yes. 00:14:06.620 --> 00:14:11.820 align:middle line:90% 00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:15.045 align:middle line:84% Plymouth and Barnstable, Mr. deMacedo. 00:14:15.045 --> 00:14:16.440 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:17.835 align:middle line:90% In the negative. 00:14:17.835 --> 00:14:21.100 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:14:21.100 --> 00:14:23.290 align:middle line:90% DeMacedo votes yes. 00:14:23.290 --> 00:14:25.059 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:14:25.059 --> 00:14:25.559 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:14:25.559 --> 00:14:32.410 align:middle line:90% 00:14:32.410 --> 00:14:34.670 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 35 members having 00:14:34.670 --> 00:14:36.500 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, two members 00:14:36.500 --> 00:14:38.480 align:middle line:84% having voted in the negative, the item 00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:41.360 align:middle line:84% passes notwithstanding the objection of the governor 00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:44.540 align:middle line:84% two thirds of the members having voted in the affirmative. 00:14:44.540 --> 00:14:45.740 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:14:45.740 --> 00:14:49.820 align:middle line:84% Item 4513-1121 contained in section two 00:14:49.820 --> 00:14:52.162 align:middle line:84% relative to the stop stroke program 00:14:52.162 --> 00:14:53.870 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:14:53.870 --> 00:14:56.390 align:middle line:84% that this item is passed notwithstanding the disapproval 00:14:56.390 --> 00:14:59.710 align:middle line:90% of the governor, 119 to 33. 00:14:59.710 --> 00:15:00.290 align:middle line:90% Senator? 00:15:00.290 --> 00:15:00.980 align:middle line:90% Yeah, I know. 00:15:00.980 --> 00:15:02.510 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 00:15:02.510 --> 00:15:05.510 align:middle line:84% shall the item pass notwithstanding the objection 00:15:05.510 --> 00:15:07.700 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 00:15:07.700 --> 00:15:10.790 align:middle line:84% Senator deMacedo from Plymouth and Barnstable. 00:15:10.790 --> 00:15:11.690 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:15:11.690 --> 00:15:15.080 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to my colleagues. 00:15:15.080 --> 00:15:17.660 align:middle line:84% I rise to ask a question in regards 00:15:17.660 --> 00:15:23.440 align:middle line:84% to this, again, item 4513-112, stop stroke program. 00:15:23.440 --> 00:15:25.190 align:middle line:84% And again I'm trying to get understanding. 00:15:25.190 --> 00:15:28.280 align:middle line:84% It seems to be reduced by $200,000 which 00:15:28.280 --> 00:15:29.550 align:middle line:90% eliminates the program. 00:15:29.550 --> 00:15:33.320 align:middle line:84% However, it seems as though from the FY spending, 00:15:33.320 --> 00:15:36.750 align:middle line:84% it was a negative $280,000 last year. 00:15:36.750 --> 00:15:40.200 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we might get an explanation of this program. 00:15:40.200 --> 00:15:41.630 align:middle line:90% Is it a new program? 00:15:41.630 --> 00:15:45.710 align:middle line:84% Or is it a existing program that was underfunded? 00:15:45.710 --> 00:15:47.540 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 00:15:47.540 --> 00:15:51.170 align:middle line:84% Yes, the senator from 2nd Essex, senator Lovely. 00:15:51.170 --> 00:15:52.910 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:15:52.910 --> 00:15:55.910 align:middle line:84% According to recent data, stroke is the third leading cause 00:15:55.910 --> 00:15:57.950 align:middle line:90% of death in Massachusetts. 00:15:57.950 --> 00:16:01.640 align:middle line:84% This account funds a public awareness program campaign 00:16:01.640 --> 00:16:03.950 align:middle line:84% regarding the signs and symptoms of stroke, 00:16:03.950 --> 00:16:06.800 align:middle line:84% expands the stroke registry data platform, 00:16:06.800 --> 00:16:10.040 align:middle line:84% and supports a new requirement for all primary stroke service 00:16:10.040 --> 00:16:12.470 align:middle line:84% hospitals and emergency medical service 00:16:12.470 --> 00:16:16.620 align:middle line:84% agencies to report standardized data to DPH. 00:16:16.620 --> 00:16:18.650 align:middle line:84% By investing in a separate program 00:16:18.650 --> 00:16:22.310 align:middle line:84% we are increasing education outreach activities. 00:16:22.310 --> 00:16:24.420 align:middle line:84% Please give the speaker their attention. 00:16:24.420 --> 00:16:27.470 align:middle line:90% It's very hard to hear in here. 00:16:27.470 --> 00:16:30.530 align:middle line:84% It's not right that someone has to get that close to hear. 00:16:30.530 --> 00:16:33.110 align:middle line:84% So if you want to speak, please go out. 00:16:33.110 --> 00:16:35.280 align:middle line:84% But we're going to be calling very quickly. 00:16:35.280 --> 00:16:38.060 align:middle line:84% So if you miss it, you missed your vote. 00:16:38.060 --> 00:16:40.085 align:middle line:90% So yes, continue. 00:16:40.085 --> 00:16:41.210 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:16:41.210 --> 00:16:45.980 align:middle line:84% By restoring $200,000 to the stop stroke program, 00:16:45.980 --> 00:16:47.450 align:middle line:84% the program would help save lives 00:16:47.450 --> 00:16:50.360 align:middle line:84% by generating public awareness and increasing the conversation 00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:52.817 align:middle line:84% on how to react when someone is suffering from a stroke. 00:16:52.817 --> 00:16:54.650 align:middle line:84% Therefore I ask that you overturn this veto. 00:16:54.650 --> 00:16:55.150 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:16:55.150 --> 00:16:57.790 align:middle line:90% 00:16:57.790 --> 00:16:59.250 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:16:59.250 --> 00:17:11.175 align:middle line:90% 00:17:11.175 --> 00:17:11.675 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:17:11.675 --> 00:17:12.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:12.680 --> 00:17:14.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:14.140 --> 00:17:15.040 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:17:15.040 --> 00:17:15.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:15.540 --> 00:17:16.579 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:16.579 --> 00:17:17.089 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:17:17.089 --> 00:17:17.859 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:17.859 --> 00:17:18.846 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:18.846 --> 00:17:19.840 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:17:19.840 --> 00:17:20.834 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:20.834 --> 00:17:21.828 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:21.828 --> 00:17:23.816 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:17:23.816 --> 00:17:24.319 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:24.319 --> 00:17:25.839 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:25.839 --> 00:17:26.700 align:middle line:90% Chang-diaz? 00:17:26.700 --> 00:17:27.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:27.200 --> 00:17:28.349 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:28.349 --> 00:17:29.061 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:17:29.061 --> 00:17:29.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:29.560 --> 00:17:30.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:30.810 --> 00:17:31.310 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:17:31.310 --> 00:17:31.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:31.880 --> 00:17:32.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:32.920 --> 00:17:35.150 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:17:35.150 --> 00:17:36.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:36.150 --> 00:17:38.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:38.260 --> 00:17:38.930 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:39.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:39.610 --> 00:17:40.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:40.780 --> 00:17:41.380 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:17:41.380 --> 00:17:42.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:42.100 --> 00:17:43.122 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:43.122 --> 00:17:44.070 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:17:44.070 --> 00:17:44.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:44.570 --> 00:17:45.436 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:45.436 --> 00:17:46.305 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:17:46.305 --> 00:17:46.804 align:middle line:90% No. 00:17:46.804 --> 00:17:47.720 align:middle line:90% No. 00:17:47.720 --> 00:17:48.573 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:17:48.573 --> 00:17:49.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:49.320 --> 00:17:50.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:50.390 --> 00:17:50.900 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:17:50.900 --> 00:17:51.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:51.780 --> 00:17:52.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:52.700 --> 00:17:53.333 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:17:53.333 --> 00:17:53.833 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:53.833 --> 00:17:54.799 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:54.799 --> 00:17:55.750 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:17:55.750 --> 00:17:56.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:56.250 --> 00:17:57.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:57.250 --> 00:17:58.070 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:17:58.070 --> 00:17:58.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:17:58.890 --> 00:18:00.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:00.030 --> 00:18:01.350 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:18:01.350 --> 00:18:01.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:01.850 --> 00:18:03.272 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:03.272 --> 00:18:04.050 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:18:04.050 --> 00:18:04.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:04.550 --> 00:18:05.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:05.900 --> 00:18:06.483 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:18:06.483 --> 00:18:07.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:07.190 --> 00:18:08.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:08.290 --> 00:18:08.820 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:18:08.820 --> 00:18:09.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:09.710 --> 00:18:10.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:10.860 --> 00:18:11.360 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:18:11.360 --> 00:18:11.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:11.860 --> 00:18:13.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:13.800 --> 00:18:14.310 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:18:14.310 --> 00:18:15.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:15.420 --> 00:18:15.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:15.930 --> 00:18:16.694 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:18:16.694 --> 00:18:17.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:17.460 --> 00:18:19.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:19.670 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:18:19.670 --> 00:18:20.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:20.300 --> 00:18:21.688 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:21.688 --> 00:18:22.646 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:18:22.646 --> 00:18:23.604 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:23.604 --> 00:18:24.562 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:24.562 --> 00:18:25.520 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:18:25.520 --> 00:18:26.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:26.480 --> 00:18:28.620 align:middle line:90% Yes O'Connor Ives? 00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:29.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:29.390 --> 00:18:31.323 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:31.323 --> 00:18:32.750 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:18:32.750 --> 00:18:33.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:33.250 --> 00:18:34.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:34.320 --> 00:18:34.920 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:18:34.920 --> 00:18:35.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:35.800 --> 00:18:36.641 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:36.641 --> 00:18:37.583 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:18:37.583 --> 00:18:38.525 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:38.525 --> 00:18:39.467 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:39.467 --> 00:18:40.380 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:18:40.380 --> 00:18:40.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:40.880 --> 00:18:42.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:42.070 --> 00:18:42.811 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:18:42.811 --> 00:18:43.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:43.310 --> 00:18:44.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:44.660 --> 00:18:45.511 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:18:45.511 --> 00:18:46.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:46.010 --> 00:18:47.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:47.460 --> 00:18:48.370 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:18:48.370 --> 00:18:48.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:48.990 --> 00:18:49.886 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:49.886 --> 00:18:50.386 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:18:50.386 --> 00:18:50.886 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:50.886 --> 00:18:52.826 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:18:52.826 --> 00:18:53.802 align:middle line:90% Have all members-- 00:18:53.802 --> 00:19:01.610 align:middle line:90% 00:19:01.610 --> 00:19:05.040 align:middle line:84% 36 in the affirmative, one in the negative. 00:19:05.040 --> 00:19:08.580 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 36 members have voted in the affirmative, 00:19:08.580 --> 00:19:10.480 align:middle line:84% one members have voted in the negative. 00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:12.660 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:19:12.660 --> 00:19:14.850 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:19:14.850 --> 00:19:16.680 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:19:16.680 --> 00:19:18.710 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:19:18.710 --> 00:19:21.820 align:middle line:84% Item 4513-1130 contained in section two 00:19:21.820 --> 00:19:24.600 align:middle line:84% relative to domestic violence and sexual assault services 00:19:24.600 --> 00:19:26.310 align:middle line:84% comes from House with the endorsement 00:19:26.310 --> 00:19:29.190 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 00:19:29.190 --> 00:19:32.770 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 131 to 23. 00:19:32.770 --> 00:19:34.489 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:19:34.489 --> 00:19:36.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:19:36.860 --> 00:19:41.240 align:middle line:90% Yes, the senator from-- 00:19:41.240 --> 00:19:46.640 align:middle line:84% senator deMacedo from Plymouth and Barnstable, thank you. 00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:51.350 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through you to my colleagues. 00:19:51.350 --> 00:19:54.740 align:middle line:84% Rising in to get an explanation again 00:19:54.740 --> 00:19:57.650 align:middle line:84% for the edification of the members and the public. 00:19:57.650 --> 00:20:03.740 align:middle line:84% Item 4513-1130 entitled Domestic Violence And Sexual Assault 00:20:03.740 --> 00:20:05.070 align:middle line:90% Prevention Treatment. 00:20:05.070 --> 00:20:07.340 align:middle line:90% This was reduced by $20,000. 00:20:07.340 --> 00:20:12.830 align:middle line:90% It is a $31,355,000 line item. 00:20:12.830 --> 00:20:15.140 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we might get an explanation why 00:20:15.140 --> 00:20:17.480 align:middle line:90% the governor vetoed $20,000. 00:20:17.480 --> 00:20:18.350 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 00:20:18.350 --> 00:20:22.240 align:middle line:90% 00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:23.910 align:middle line:90% Senator Spilka. 00:20:23.910 --> 00:20:26.640 align:middle line:84% Thank you, and I appreciate the question 00:20:26.640 --> 00:20:30.240 align:middle line:84% as to why the governor vetoed the $20,000 00:20:30.240 --> 00:20:34.020 align:middle line:84% and I am simply unable to answer that question. 00:20:34.020 --> 00:20:38.340 align:middle line:84% This $20,000 is for a domestic violence program 00:20:38.340 --> 00:20:43.230 align:middle line:84% called Delamano Inc. And it services and provides 00:20:43.230 --> 00:20:48.060 align:middle line:84% resources for individuals to disassociate them 00:20:48.060 --> 00:20:50.620 align:middle line:84% from any conditions of domestic violence. 00:20:50.620 --> 00:20:55.860 align:middle line:84% So it helps the individuals leave domestic violence 00:20:55.860 --> 00:21:00.510 align:middle line:84% situations, sexual abuse, unhealthy relationships. 00:21:00.510 --> 00:21:02.790 align:middle line:84% So we know how critically important 00:21:02.790 --> 00:21:06.240 align:middle line:84% these services are so I ask that you overturn his veto. 00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:08.760 align:middle line:90% 00:21:08.760 --> 00:21:10.080 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:21:10.080 --> 00:21:12.380 align:middle line:90% 00:21:12.380 --> 00:21:12.880 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:21:12.880 --> 00:21:14.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:14.040 --> 00:21:14.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:14.990 --> 00:21:15.800 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:21:15.800 --> 00:21:16.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:16.570 --> 00:21:17.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:17.460 --> 00:21:18.120 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:21:18.120 --> 00:21:19.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:19.230 --> 00:21:20.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:20.020 --> 00:21:20.600 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:21:20.600 --> 00:21:21.100 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:21:21.100 --> 00:21:22.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:22.220 --> 00:21:23.206 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:21:23.206 --> 00:21:23.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:23.900 --> 00:21:25.740 align:middle line:90% Yes Chang-Diaz? 00:21:25.740 --> 00:21:26.410 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:26.410 --> 00:21:27.280 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:27.280 --> 00:21:27.830 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:21:27.830 --> 00:21:28.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:28.890 --> 00:21:29.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:29.490 --> 00:21:30.334 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:21:30.334 --> 00:21:31.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:31.600 --> 00:21:32.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:32.520 --> 00:21:33.380 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:21:33.380 --> 00:21:34.140 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:34.140 --> 00:21:35.080 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:35.080 --> 00:21:36.086 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:21:36.086 --> 00:21:36.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:36.840 --> 00:21:37.668 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:37.668 --> 00:21:38.544 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:21:38.544 --> 00:21:39.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:39.420 --> 00:21:40.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:40.590 --> 00:21:41.686 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:21:41.686 --> 00:21:42.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:42.460 --> 00:21:43.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:43.290 --> 00:21:44.360 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:21:44.360 --> 00:21:44.860 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:44.860 --> 00:21:45.740 align:middle line:90% No. 00:21:45.740 --> 00:21:46.410 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:21:46.410 --> 00:21:48.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:48.090 --> 00:21:48.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:48.840 --> 00:21:49.530 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:21:49.530 --> 00:21:50.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:50.790 --> 00:21:51.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:51.480 --> 00:21:52.230 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:21:52.230 --> 00:21:52.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:52.940 --> 00:21:53.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:53.890 --> 00:21:56.190 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:21:56.190 --> 00:21:57.071 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:21:57.071 --> 00:21:57.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:57.570 --> 00:21:58.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:21:58.950 --> 00:21:59.720 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:00.640 align:middle line:90% No. 00:22:00.640 --> 00:22:01.452 align:middle line:90% No. 00:22:01.452 --> 00:22:04.224 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:22:04.224 --> 00:22:05.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:05.150 --> 00:22:06.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:07.380 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:22:07.380 --> 00:22:08.380 align:middle line:90% Aye. 00:22:08.380 --> 00:22:09.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:09.090 --> 00:22:09.650 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:22:09.650 --> 00:22:10.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:10.590 --> 00:22:11.345 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:11.345 --> 00:22:11.845 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:22:11.845 --> 00:22:12.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:12.790 --> 00:22:13.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:13.290 --> 00:22:14.790 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:22:14.790 --> 00:22:15.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:15.530 --> 00:22:16.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:16.470 --> 00:22:17.100 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:22:17.100 --> 00:22:18.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:18.080 --> 00:22:18.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:18.590 --> 00:22:19.110 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:22:19.110 --> 00:22:20.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:20.280 --> 00:22:21.214 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:21.214 --> 00:22:21.714 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:22:21.714 --> 00:22:22.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:22.670 --> 00:22:23.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:23.390 --> 00:22:23.890 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:22:23.890 --> 00:22:25.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:25.140 --> 00:22:25.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:25.830 --> 00:22:26.890 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:22:26.890 --> 00:22:27.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:27.750 --> 00:22:29.490 align:middle line:90% Yes O'Connor Ives? 00:22:29.490 --> 00:22:30.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:30.630 --> 00:22:31.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:31.220 --> 00:22:32.010 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:22:32.010 --> 00:22:33.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:33.290 --> 00:22:33.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:33.810 --> 00:22:35.002 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:22:35.002 --> 00:22:36.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:36.180 --> 00:22:36.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:36.810 --> 00:22:37.440 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:38.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:38.710 --> 00:22:39.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:39.270 --> 00:22:39.780 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:22:39.780 --> 00:22:40.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:40.710 --> 00:22:41.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:41.210 --> 00:22:42.130 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:22:42.130 --> 00:22:43.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:43.050 --> 00:22:43.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:43.930 --> 00:22:45.220 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:22:45.220 --> 00:22:46.080 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:22:46.080 --> 00:22:47.145 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:47.145 --> 00:22:47.981 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:22:47.981 --> 00:22:48.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:48.480 --> 00:22:49.417 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:49.417 --> 00:22:50.371 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:22:50.371 --> 00:22:51.325 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:22:51.325 --> 00:22:52.279 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:52.279 --> 00:22:53.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:22:53.710 --> 00:22:56.159 align:middle line:90% 33 to four. 00:22:56.159 --> 00:22:57.450 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:22:57.450 --> 00:23:05.700 align:middle line:90% 00:23:05.700 --> 00:23:09.280 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 33 members have voted in the affirmative, 00:23:09.280 --> 00:23:10.850 align:middle line:90% four have voted in negative. 00:23:10.850 --> 00:23:13.120 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:23:13.120 --> 00:23:15.430 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:23:15.430 --> 00:23:17.440 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:18.180 align:middle line:90% Senator Rush? 00:23:18.180 --> 00:23:25.940 align:middle line:90% 00:23:25.940 --> 00:23:27.395 align:middle line:90% The chair invites the sen-- 00:23:27.395 --> 00:23:32.730 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:23:32.730 --> 00:23:35.050 align:middle line:84% The senator from Norfolk and Suffolk, 00:23:35.050 --> 00:23:36.490 align:middle line:90% senator Rush to the rostrum. 00:23:36.490 --> 00:23:53.650 align:middle line:90% 00:23:53.650 --> 00:23:54.640 align:middle line:90% Senator Rush. 00:23:54.640 --> 00:24:03.600 align:middle line:90% 00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:06.240 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President, and through to the members. 00:24:06.240 --> 00:24:08.040 align:middle line:84% It is my distinct honor and privilege 00:24:08.040 --> 00:24:10.050 align:middle line:84% to stand before the Massachusetts State Senate 00:24:10.050 --> 00:24:13.660 align:middle line:90% today to do three things. 00:24:13.660 --> 00:24:18.960 align:middle line:84% First and foremost, wish a very happy 242nd birthday 00:24:18.960 --> 00:24:23.130 align:middle line:84% to the United States Navy, the world's finest navy, 00:24:23.130 --> 00:24:25.230 align:middle line:90% and wish them a happy 240-- 00:24:25.230 --> 00:24:26.250 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:24:26.250 --> 00:24:27.300 align:middle line:90% Absolutely right. 00:24:27.300 --> 00:24:31.052 align:middle line:90% 00:24:31.052 --> 00:24:32.230 align:middle line:90% Good crew here, right? 00:24:32.230 --> 00:24:39.660 align:middle line:90% 00:24:39.660 --> 00:24:40.790 align:middle line:90% All right, outstanding. 00:24:40.790 --> 00:24:45.330 align:middle line:84% Secondly, I would like to wish a very happy 220th birthday 00:24:45.330 --> 00:24:46.680 align:middle line:90% to the United States-- 00:24:46.680 --> 00:24:50.040 align:middle line:84% the USS Constitution, the oldest commissioned warship 00:24:50.040 --> 00:24:53.490 align:middle line:84% afloat in the world, nicknamed Old Iron Side 00:24:53.490 --> 00:24:55.200 align:middle line:90% in the War of 1812. 00:24:55.200 --> 00:24:58.950 align:middle line:84% Not only that gem of the United States Navy but also 00:24:58.950 --> 00:25:01.410 align:middle line:84% the city of Boston in our very own Commonwealth 00:25:01.410 --> 00:25:02.310 align:middle line:90% of Massachusetts. 00:25:02.310 --> 00:25:04.950 align:middle line:84% So happy birthday USS Constitution. 00:25:04.950 --> 00:25:06.417 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:25:06.417 --> 00:25:14.250 align:middle line:90% 00:25:14.250 --> 00:25:16.420 align:middle line:84% And third and lastly, to introduce 00:25:16.420 --> 00:25:20.520 align:middle line:84% the current commanding officer of the USS Constitution 00:25:20.520 --> 00:25:22.560 align:middle line:84% and just tell you a little bit about him. 00:25:22.560 --> 00:25:24.057 align:middle line:84% And he's going to say a few words 00:25:24.057 --> 00:25:25.890 align:middle line:84% about all the great things that have gone on 00:25:25.890 --> 00:25:28.320 align:middle line:84% over at Constitution the last three years 00:25:28.320 --> 00:25:30.730 align:middle line:84% and introduce some other sailors here as well. 00:25:30.730 --> 00:25:32.550 align:middle line:84% But I just want you to know a little bit 00:25:32.550 --> 00:25:36.514 align:middle line:84% about the skipper of the boat, because he has just 00:25:36.514 --> 00:25:37.680 align:middle line:90% done some incredible things. 00:25:37.680 --> 00:25:39.450 align:middle line:84% Commander Robert Gerosa is a native 00:25:39.450 --> 00:25:42.360 align:middle line:84% of New Rochelle, New York, but more importantly 00:25:42.360 --> 00:25:44.890 align:middle line:84% a graduate of Providence College. 00:25:44.890 --> 00:25:47.480 align:middle line:90% All right, there we go. 00:25:47.480 --> 00:25:49.680 align:middle line:84% Selected to attend Naval Officer Candidate School 00:25:49.680 --> 00:25:53.100 align:middle line:84% and was commissioned an ensign in September of 1997. 00:25:53.100 --> 00:25:56.102 align:middle line:84% His assignments have included the USS Nassau, 00:25:56.102 --> 00:25:57.810 align:middle line:84% where he was the main propulsion division 00:25:57.810 --> 00:25:59.760 align:middle line:90% officer and electrical officer. 00:25:59.760 --> 00:26:02.520 align:middle line:84% During his tenure, the Nassau deployed to the Mediterranean 00:26:02.520 --> 00:26:04.830 align:middle line:84% Sea in support of NATO operations 00:26:04.830 --> 00:26:07.050 align:middle line:90% during the Kosovo campaign. 00:26:07.050 --> 00:26:11.010 align:middle line:84% In May 2000, Commander Gerosa transfer to the guided missile 00:26:11.010 --> 00:26:15.450 align:middle line:84% destroyer, USS Ramage as the combat information center 00:26:15.450 --> 00:26:18.930 align:middle line:84% officer and assistance operations officer. 00:26:18.930 --> 00:26:22.860 align:middle line:84% Following the September 11th 2001 terrorist attacks, 00:26:22.860 --> 00:26:26.405 align:middle line:84% Ramage was the first ship in the Atlantic fleet 00:26:26.405 --> 00:26:28.110 align:middle line:84% off the East Coast of the United States 00:26:28.110 --> 00:26:30.870 align:middle line:84% to provide extended radar coverage for Washington 00:26:30.870 --> 00:26:33.450 align:middle line:90% DC and New York City. 00:26:33.450 --> 00:26:35.130 align:middle line:84% Remage went on to deploy overseas 00:26:35.130 --> 00:26:38.640 align:middle line:84% in support of Operation Noble Eagle and Enduring Freedom. 00:26:38.640 --> 00:26:41.280 align:middle line:84% In March of 2003, he was selected as a lieutenant 00:26:41.280 --> 00:26:44.200 align:middle line:84% to attend the United States Naval War College in Newport, 00:26:44.200 --> 00:26:46.080 align:middle line:84% Rhode Island and graduated where he 00:26:46.080 --> 00:26:47.790 align:middle line:84% was awarded a master of science degree 00:26:47.790 --> 00:26:50.940 align:middle line:84% in national security and strategic studies. 00:26:50.940 --> 00:26:55.320 align:middle line:84% In March of 2005, he reported to the USS Whidbey Island 00:26:55.320 --> 00:26:56.670 align:middle line:90% as a first Lieutenant. 00:26:56.670 --> 00:26:59.070 align:middle line:84% In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, 00:26:59.070 --> 00:27:02.730 align:middle line:84% Whidbey Island became part of the Task Force Katrina 00:27:02.730 --> 00:27:06.210 align:middle line:84% and conducted humanitarian and disaster relief assistance 00:27:06.210 --> 00:27:07.620 align:middle line:90% in the gulf states. 00:27:07.620 --> 00:27:12.450 align:middle line:84% In July 2006, he transferred to amphibious squadron two, Bataan 00:27:12.450 --> 00:27:16.140 align:middle line:84% expeditionary strike group as the staff operational officer. 00:27:16.140 --> 00:27:21.480 align:middle line:84% He also served as the amphibious staff officer for CTF 51/59 00:27:21.480 --> 00:27:22.770 align:middle line:90% at NAVCENT. 00:27:22.770 --> 00:27:24.300 align:middle line:84% Commander Gerosa's shore assignments 00:27:24.300 --> 00:27:27.360 align:middle line:84% include director of operational support for the Naval War 00:27:27.360 --> 00:27:30.930 align:middle line:84% College international program, aide de camp for the director 00:27:30.930 --> 00:27:33.710 align:middle line:84% of expeditionary warfare op nav staff, 00:27:33.710 --> 00:27:36.810 align:middle line:84% in service amphibious ships resources officer, 00:27:36.810 --> 00:27:40.290 align:middle line:84% and expeditionary warfare lead instructor at surface warfare 00:27:40.290 --> 00:27:41.610 align:middle line:90% officer school. 00:27:41.610 --> 00:27:45.110 align:middle line:84% In August 2015, commander Gerosa assumed 00:27:45.110 --> 00:27:48.720 align:middle line:84% command of the USS Constitution, today, 00:27:48.720 --> 00:27:51.780 align:middle line:84% as the ship's 74th commanding officer. 00:27:51.780 --> 00:27:55.380 align:middle line:84% Please join me in welcoming the skipper to the Massachusetts 00:27:55.380 --> 00:27:56.437 align:middle line:90% State Senate. 00:27:56.437 --> 00:28:16.320 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:28:16.320 --> 00:28:19.260 align:middle line:84% For the last-- thank you very much. 00:28:19.260 --> 00:28:24.280 align:middle line:84% For the last 21 years, I've tried to fly below the radar. 00:28:24.280 --> 00:28:26.250 align:middle line:90% You go to work, you do your job. 00:28:26.250 --> 00:28:30.060 align:middle line:84% This job, being a part of something so special 00:28:30.060 --> 00:28:33.490 align:middle line:84% not only for the Navy but to the state of Massachusetts 00:28:33.490 --> 00:28:35.580 align:middle line:90% and to the nation. 00:28:35.580 --> 00:28:37.740 align:middle line:84% You're right in the center of the radar. 00:28:37.740 --> 00:28:39.510 align:middle line:84% And I'm always humbled and I'm kind of 00:28:39.510 --> 00:28:42.480 align:middle line:84% mortified as people are reading my bio 00:28:42.480 --> 00:28:44.220 align:middle line:84% and I definitely need to shorten that. 00:28:44.220 --> 00:28:47.280 align:middle line:84% So thank you for the warm welcome. 00:28:47.280 --> 00:28:51.470 align:middle line:84% I do [INAUDIBLE] commander Nate Schick, who is relieving me. 00:28:51.470 --> 00:28:57.590 align:middle line:84% He will be number 75 in command of the USS Constitution, which 00:28:57.590 --> 00:29:01.470 align:middle line:84% is again, the cornerstone of our fleet. 00:29:01.470 --> 00:29:06.190 align:middle line:84% My XO, Tim Anderson, and Tim's relief-- 00:29:06.190 --> 00:29:09.160 align:middle line:84% you got us all at a good time-- commander John Bender, who 00:29:09.160 --> 00:29:11.680 align:middle line:90% is just between John and Nate. 00:29:11.680 --> 00:29:15.294 align:middle line:84% They're both coming off of out doing the nation's business. 00:29:15.294 --> 00:29:17.270 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:29:17.270 --> 00:29:39.050 align:middle line:90% 00:29:39.050 --> 00:29:43.640 align:middle line:84% Over the last three years I've had it pretty good, 00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:46.310 align:middle line:90% even as a New Yorker. 00:29:46.310 --> 00:29:50.030 align:middle line:84% So me and my family have had the opportunity 00:29:50.030 --> 00:29:52.190 align:middle line:84% to be a part of something special, 00:29:52.190 --> 00:29:55.640 align:middle line:84% be a part of a state that looks after 00:29:55.640 --> 00:30:01.610 align:middle line:84% not just its military people, its military active duty, 00:30:01.610 --> 00:30:04.250 align:middle line:90% reserves, guardsmen-- 00:30:04.250 --> 00:30:08.600 align:middle line:84% but a state that looks after all of its citizens. 00:30:08.600 --> 00:30:10.760 align:middle line:90% This is truly a special place. 00:30:10.760 --> 00:30:13.400 align:middle line:84% And I happened to be with the governor Baker 00:30:13.400 --> 00:30:17.900 align:middle line:84% last night for a brief minute at a reception and I told him, 00:30:17.900 --> 00:30:20.810 align:middle line:84% I said, to be a part of something 00:30:20.810 --> 00:30:23.960 align:middle line:84% so special takes a large organization and one 00:30:23.960 --> 00:30:25.400 align:middle line:90% that needs to talk. 00:30:25.400 --> 00:30:27.590 align:middle line:90% I have a ship of 70 people. 00:30:27.590 --> 00:30:29.300 align:middle line:84% We don't get along on a daily basis, 00:30:29.300 --> 00:30:34.400 align:middle line:84% but at the end of the day we do what's best for the ship, 00:30:34.400 --> 00:30:36.330 align:middle line:84% just like what you're doing here today. 00:30:36.330 --> 00:30:40.640 align:middle line:84% So I appreciate everything that you 00:30:40.640 --> 00:30:44.570 align:middle line:84% do for the state, our military personnel, and our veterans. 00:30:44.570 --> 00:30:48.260 align:middle line:84% The ship has been in a bit of a rehab period. 00:30:48.260 --> 00:30:51.680 align:middle line:84% You know, 220 years, she was time 00:30:51.680 --> 00:30:53.150 align:middle line:90% for a little bit of service. 00:30:53.150 --> 00:30:55.670 align:middle line:84% So we did take her out of the water. 00:30:55.670 --> 00:31:00.580 align:middle line:84% But she is back in, I'm happy to say, after about 26 months 00:31:00.580 --> 00:31:02.840 align:middle line:90% in dry dock. 00:31:02.840 --> 00:31:05.970 align:middle line:84% Constitution was only supposed to last [INAUDIBLE] service. 00:31:05.970 --> 00:31:09.260 align:middle line:84% 220 years, we're still maintaining her. 00:31:09.260 --> 00:31:12.210 align:middle line:84% You might ask why that the government is spending-- 00:31:12.210 --> 00:31:14.180 align:middle line:84% it wasn't, I would say, a lot of money-- 00:31:14.180 --> 00:31:18.800 align:middle line:84% but the government spent money to ensure this ship remains 00:31:18.800 --> 00:31:20.300 align:middle line:90% a part of our fleet. 00:31:20.300 --> 00:31:23.770 align:middle line:84% It maintains a part of the state. 00:31:23.770 --> 00:31:26.150 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE], we go out to sea. 00:31:26.150 --> 00:31:28.310 align:middle line:90% That's what we do. 00:31:28.310 --> 00:31:32.000 align:middle line:84% Most people don't get a chance to step aboard Navy vessels. 00:31:32.000 --> 00:31:33.666 align:middle line:84% When people come aboard Constitution, 00:31:33.666 --> 00:31:35.540 align:middle line:84% and we see somewhere between a half a million 00:31:35.540 --> 00:31:39.620 align:middle line:84% and 600,000 visitors a year, those visitors 00:31:39.620 --> 00:31:41.150 align:middle line:90% are not just from Massachusetts. 00:31:41.150 --> 00:31:43.220 align:middle line:90% They're from around the world. 00:31:43.220 --> 00:31:46.970 align:middle line:84% When they step aboard, they are seeing the nation's best 00:31:46.970 --> 00:31:48.130 align:middle line:90% and brightest. 00:31:48.130 --> 00:31:51.860 align:middle line:84% My sailors, your sailors, come from all corners 00:31:51.860 --> 00:31:52.880 align:middle line:90% of the country. 00:31:52.880 --> 00:31:58.490 align:middle line:84% They represent every race, every diversity, every religion. 00:31:58.490 --> 00:31:59.930 align:middle line:84% They all have one thing in common. 00:31:59.930 --> 00:32:02.330 align:middle line:84% They raised their right hand, just like you all 00:32:02.330 --> 00:32:05.000 align:middle line:84% do, to support and defend something bigger 00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:06.270 align:middle line:90% than themselves. 00:32:06.270 --> 00:32:09.050 align:middle line:90% It is selfless service. 00:32:09.050 --> 00:32:11.820 align:middle line:84% So when people step aboard your ship, 00:32:11.820 --> 00:32:14.300 align:middle line:84% it's America's ship of state, they 00:32:14.300 --> 00:32:17.480 align:middle line:84% are seeing the best and brightest of America. 00:32:17.480 --> 00:32:20.540 align:middle line:84% They are seeing active duty sailors. 00:32:20.540 --> 00:32:22.580 align:middle line:84% And though we have a pretty good year, 00:32:22.580 --> 00:32:25.850 align:middle line:84% we will all go on to do other things. 00:32:25.850 --> 00:32:32.900 align:middle line:84% We have 322,000 sailors in about 275 ships. 00:32:32.900 --> 00:32:37.160 align:middle line:84% Out of that more than 100,000 sailors are deployed right now. 00:32:37.160 --> 00:32:38.990 align:middle line:90% We have 150 ships at sea. 00:32:38.990 --> 00:32:40.970 align:middle line:84% We're doing humanitarian operations. 00:32:40.970 --> 00:32:42.580 align:middle line:90% We're doing combat operations. 00:32:42.580 --> 00:32:46.030 align:middle line:90% We're doing anti-piracy. 00:32:46.030 --> 00:32:49.160 align:middle line:84% We like to say, it's kind of like the police. 00:32:49.160 --> 00:32:50.840 align:middle line:90% We're there when you need them. 00:32:50.840 --> 00:32:54.690 align:middle line:84% Well, we're there around the clock, 24 hours a day, 00:32:54.690 --> 00:32:55.950 align:middle line:90% seven days a week. 00:32:55.950 --> 00:33:00.890 align:middle line:84% So we will be there when we get the call. 00:33:00.890 --> 00:33:07.100 align:middle line:84% So again, Constitution, we represent all the people 00:33:07.100 --> 00:33:11.610 align:middle line:84% that wear this uniform and serve this great nation. 00:33:11.610 --> 00:33:14.790 align:middle line:84% So I would like to say thank you for recognizing us. 00:33:14.790 --> 00:33:15.940 align:middle line:90% Please come out. 00:33:15.940 --> 00:33:17.180 align:middle line:90% Please come down. 00:33:17.180 --> 00:33:19.160 align:middle line:84% Senator Rush knows how to get in touch with me 00:33:19.160 --> 00:33:23.030 align:middle line:84% and he will know how to get in touch with commander Bender. 00:33:23.030 --> 00:33:24.270 align:middle line:90% I'm sorry, commander Shick. 00:33:24.270 --> 00:33:25.186 align:middle line:90% I was looking at John. 00:33:25.186 --> 00:33:26.120 align:middle line:90% Sorry about that. 00:33:26.120 --> 00:33:29.040 align:middle line:90% The two of them. 00:33:29.040 --> 00:33:31.550 align:middle line:90% So it is your ship. 00:33:31.550 --> 00:33:33.139 align:middle line:90% Pleas Come down. 00:33:33.139 --> 00:33:34.430 align:middle line:90% Thank you for the warm welcome. 00:33:34.430 --> 00:33:36.380 align:middle line:84% Thank you for the birthday wishes. 00:33:36.380 --> 00:33:39.350 align:middle line:84% And I wish all of you continued success 00:33:39.350 --> 00:33:41.480 align:middle line:90% or for this great state. 00:33:41.480 --> 00:33:42.396 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:33:42.396 --> 00:33:43.884 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:33:43.884 --> 00:33:58.268 align:middle line:90% 00:33:58.268 --> 00:33:59.756 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:33:59.756 --> 00:34:49.429 align:middle line:90% 00:34:49.429 --> 00:34:52.940 align:middle line:84% At this point, as is tradition with the United States 00:34:52.940 --> 00:34:57.290 align:middle line:84% Navy and all military branches, in celebration of the birthday 00:34:57.290 --> 00:34:58.670 align:middle line:90% we are going to cut a cake. 00:34:58.670 --> 00:35:02.270 align:middle line:84% And we do this by-- we brought a sword with us today. 00:35:02.270 --> 00:35:05.050 align:middle line:84% And the oldest sailor and the youngest sailor 00:35:05.050 --> 00:35:06.120 align:middle line:90% will cut the cake. 00:35:06.120 --> 00:35:09.590 align:middle line:84% And the cake says happy birthday United States Navy on it. 00:35:09.590 --> 00:35:13.190 align:middle line:84% I would like to, as the book is signed here by our guest, 00:35:13.190 --> 00:35:16.640 align:middle line:84% acknowledge that the crew of the Constitution 00:35:16.640 --> 00:35:19.610 align:middle line:84% commanding officers and the XOs were guests of myself 00:35:19.610 --> 00:35:22.040 align:middle line:84% and Senator DiDomenico who represents Charlestown 00:35:22.040 --> 00:35:25.250 align:middle line:84% and the USS Constitution, and Senator Bruce Tarr who 00:35:25.250 --> 00:35:28.760 align:middle line:84% is an expert aficionado of the history 00:35:28.760 --> 00:35:31.110 align:middle line:84% and current workings of the USS Constitution 00:35:31.110 --> 00:35:32.850 align:middle line:84% and follows it very, very closely. 00:35:32.850 --> 00:35:35.660 align:middle line:84% So the three of us, and all of the Massachusetts State Senate, 00:35:35.660 --> 00:35:36.680 align:middle line:90% welcome you. 00:35:36.680 --> 00:35:39.038 align:middle line:84% And we will get ready to cut the cake. 00:35:39.038 --> 00:35:45.014 align:middle line:90% 00:35:45.014 --> 00:35:46.508 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:35:46.508 --> 00:37:56.740 align:middle line:90% 00:37:56.740 --> 00:37:58.686 align:middle line:90% The senator from Middle-- 00:37:58.686 --> 00:38:00.120 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] report of committee. 00:38:00.120 --> 00:38:00.620 align:middle line:90% Oh. 00:38:00.620 --> 00:38:02.380 align:middle line:90% Report of a committee. 00:38:02.380 --> 00:38:03.170 align:middle line:90% The senator from-- 00:38:03.170 --> 00:38:04.789 align:middle line:90% Wait a minute. 00:38:04.789 --> 00:38:06.580 align:middle line:84% The committee on ways and means [INAUDIBLE] 00:38:06.580 --> 00:38:09.820 align:middle line:84% the Senate bill relative to criminal justice reform, senate 00:38:09.820 --> 00:38:11.320 align:middle line:90% number 2170. 00:38:11.320 --> 00:38:12.720 align:middle line:84% Reports recommended the same want 00:38:12.720 --> 00:38:14.830 align:middle line:84% to pass with an amendment substituting 00:38:14.830 --> 00:38:17.860 align:middle line:84% a new draft with the same title senate number 2185, 00:38:17.860 --> 00:38:22.180 align:middle line:84% estimated cost fiscal 18 cost in excess of one million dollars. 00:38:22.180 --> 00:38:24.220 align:middle line:84% Karen E. Spilka for the committee. 00:38:24.220 --> 00:38:26.990 align:middle line:84% The senator from Middlesex and Norfolk, Ms. Spilka, 00:38:26.990 --> 00:38:30.720 align:middle line:84% has presented an order which the clerk will read. 00:38:30.720 --> 00:38:33.327 align:middle line:84% Order that no standing senate rule seven, 00:38:33.327 --> 00:38:35.410 align:middle line:84% or any other rule to the contrary, the Senate bill 00:38:35.410 --> 00:38:39.297 align:middle line:84% relative to criminal justice reform, senate number 2170. 00:38:39.297 --> 00:38:41.380 align:middle line:84% The committee on ways and means having recommended 00:38:41.380 --> 00:38:43.588 align:middle line:84% that the bill be amended by substituting a new draft, 00:38:43.588 --> 00:38:46.420 align:middle line:84% senate number 2185, shall be placed in the [INAUDIBLE] 00:38:46.420 --> 00:38:50.617 align:middle line:84% for a second reading on Thursday, October 26, 2017. 00:38:50.617 --> 00:38:52.450 align:middle line:84% All amendments shall be filed electronically 00:38:52.450 --> 00:38:54.116 align:middle line:84% in the office of the clerk of the Senate 00:38:54.116 --> 00:38:59.410 align:middle line:84% by 5:00 PM on Monday, October 23rd, 2017. 00:38:59.410 --> 00:39:01.660 align:middle line:84% All such amendments shall be second reading amendments 00:39:01.660 --> 00:39:04.770 align:middle line:84% to Senate number 2185, but further amendments 00:39:04.770 --> 00:39:07.850 align:middle line:84% in third degree to such amendments shall be in order. 00:39:07.850 --> 00:39:11.070 align:middle line:84% The clerk shall further specify the procedure and format 00:39:11.070 --> 00:39:13.990 align:middle line:84% for filing all amendments consistent with this order. 00:39:13.990 --> 00:39:16.579 align:middle line:84% After the bill is amended, it is ordered to a third reading. 00:39:16.579 --> 00:39:19.120 align:middle line:84% It shall immediately be read it a third time and the question 00:39:19.120 --> 00:39:21.632 align:middle line:84% then immediately be on passing it to be engrossed. 00:39:21.632 --> 00:39:23.090 align:middle line:84% And no amendments shall be in order 00:39:23.090 --> 00:39:24.640 align:middle line:84% on the third being of the bill unless recommended 00:39:24.640 --> 00:39:26.795 align:middle line:84% by the committee on bills in the third reading. 00:39:26.795 --> 00:39:28.930 align:middle line:84% Do the rules refer to a committee 00:39:28.930 --> 00:39:31.354 align:middle line:90% on rules report of a committee? 00:39:31.354 --> 00:39:32.770 align:middle line:84% The committee on rules [INAUDIBLE] 00:39:32.770 --> 00:39:34.660 align:middle line:84% refer to senate order reports recommended 00:39:34.660 --> 00:39:38.352 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] to be adopted, Mark C. Montigny for the committee. 00:39:38.352 --> 00:39:40.270 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:39:40.270 --> 00:39:44.200 align:middle line:84% The senator from 2nd Middlesex and Suffolk, 00:39:44.200 --> 00:39:46.360 align:middle line:84% senator Brownsberger, moves that the rules 00:39:46.360 --> 00:39:49.750 align:middle line:84% be suspended so that the matter may be considered forthwith. 00:39:49.750 --> 00:39:51.950 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 00:39:51.950 --> 00:39:53.090 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 00:39:53.090 --> 00:39:55.120 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the rules are suspended. 00:39:55.120 --> 00:39:58.030 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on the adoption of the order. 00:39:58.030 --> 00:39:59.870 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 00:39:59.870 --> 00:40:00.980 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 00:40:00.980 --> 00:40:04.180 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the order is adopted. 00:40:04.180 --> 00:40:07.060 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:40:07.060 --> 00:40:11.080 align:middle line:84% Item number 4516-1000 contained in section two, 00:40:11.080 --> 00:40:14.290 align:middle line:84% the center for laboratory and communicable diseases 00:40:14.290 --> 00:40:16.030 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:40:16.030 --> 00:40:18.880 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 00:40:18.880 --> 00:40:22.150 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 121 to 31. 00:40:22.150 --> 00:40:24.250 align:middle line:84% Question before the Senate is, shall the item 00:40:24.250 --> 00:40:26.500 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objection of the governor 00:40:26.500 --> 00:40:29.140 align:middle line:90% to the contrary? 00:40:29.140 --> 00:40:32.430 align:middle line:90% Senator deMacedo. 00:40:32.430 --> 00:40:35.350 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam President and through you to our colleagues. 00:40:35.350 --> 00:40:40.330 align:middle line:84% In regards to item 4516-1000, this 00:40:40.330 --> 00:40:42.520 align:middle line:84% is the state laboratory and communicable diseases 00:40:42.520 --> 00:40:44.800 align:middle line:90% control services. 00:40:44.800 --> 00:40:47.160 align:middle line:84% Again, this was a $12 million line item. 00:40:47.160 --> 00:40:49.870 align:middle line:90% It was reduced by $462,000. 00:40:49.870 --> 00:40:53.110 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that the gentlelady from Ashland, 00:40:53.110 --> 00:40:54.880 align:middle line:84% the chair of ways and means, might 00:40:54.880 --> 00:40:58.291 align:middle line:84% be able give us an explanation of what this override does. 00:40:58.291 --> 00:40:58.790 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:40:58.790 --> 00:41:00.850 align:middle line:90% Senator Spilka. 00:41:00.850 --> 00:41:02.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:41:02.110 --> 00:41:07.870 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce the state lab account by $462,000. 00:41:07.870 --> 00:41:11.930 align:middle line:84% The account supports the bureau of infectious diseases, 00:41:11.930 --> 00:41:15.190 align:middle line:84% including the operations of the state lab. 00:41:15.190 --> 00:41:19.020 align:middle line:84% So that lab conducts vital work across the Commonwealth 00:41:19.020 --> 00:41:24.661 align:middle line:84% for screenings, for STDs, chemical illness, poisoning, 00:41:24.661 --> 00:41:31.360 align:middle line:84% food borne illness, TB, viral illnesses, and vaccine 00:41:31.360 --> 00:41:33.610 align:middle line:90% preventable diseases. 00:41:33.610 --> 00:41:36.910 align:middle line:84% This lab is a major defense to all 00:41:36.910 --> 00:41:39.130 align:middle line:84% of those areas in the Commonwealth 00:41:39.130 --> 00:41:41.380 align:middle line:84% and is vital to our health and wellness. 00:41:41.380 --> 00:41:44.800 align:middle line:84% I ask that you vote to override the veto. 00:41:44.800 --> 00:41:46.100 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:41:46.100 --> 00:41:49.082 align:middle line:90% 00:41:49.082 --> 00:41:50.076 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:41:50.076 --> 00:41:51.067 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:51.067 --> 00:41:51.567 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:51.567 --> 00:41:52.558 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:41:52.558 --> 00:41:53.058 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:53.058 --> 00:41:53.555 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:53.555 --> 00:41:54.055 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:41:54.055 --> 00:41:55.043 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:55.043 --> 00:41:55.543 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:55.543 --> 00:41:56.537 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:41:56.537 --> 00:41:57.528 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:41:57.528 --> 00:41:58.028 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:41:58.028 --> 00:42:02.520 align:middle line:90% 00:42:02.520 --> 00:42:03.540 align:middle line:90% Chang-diaz? 00:42:03.540 --> 00:42:04.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:04.410 --> 00:42:04.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:04.920 --> 00:42:05.600 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:42:05.600 --> 00:42:06.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:06.390 --> 00:42:07.367 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:07.367 --> 00:42:10.229 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:42:10.229 --> 00:42:11.890 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:42:11.890 --> 00:42:12.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:12.650 --> 00:42:13.440 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:42:13.440 --> 00:42:14.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:14.420 --> 00:42:15.056 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:15.056 --> 00:42:15.730 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:42:15.730 --> 00:42:16.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:16.540 --> 00:42:17.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:17.050 --> 00:42:20.032 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:42:20.032 --> 00:42:22.514 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:42:22.514 --> 00:42:23.014 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:42:23.014 --> 00:42:24.008 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:42:24.008 --> 00:42:25.002 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:25.002 --> 00:42:27.984 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:42:27.984 --> 00:42:29.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:29.000 --> 00:42:29.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:29.910 --> 00:42:31.036 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:42:31.036 --> 00:42:31.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:31.970 --> 00:42:32.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:32.570 --> 00:42:33.180 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:42:33.180 --> 00:42:34.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:34.170 --> 00:42:35.126 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:35.126 --> 00:42:36.584 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:42:36.584 --> 00:42:39.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:39.000 --> 00:42:39.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:39.500 --> 00:42:40.472 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:40.472 --> 00:42:41.444 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:42:41.444 --> 00:42:42.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:42.420 --> 00:42:43.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:43.230 --> 00:42:44.714 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:42:44.714 --> 00:42:45.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:45.570 --> 00:42:46.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:46.600 --> 00:42:49.050 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:42:49.050 --> 00:42:50.030 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:42:50.030 --> 00:42:52.000 align:middle line:90% Roll call. 00:42:52.000 --> 00:42:53.475 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:42:53.475 --> 00:42:54.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:54.630 --> 00:42:55.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:55.180 --> 00:42:55.770 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:42:55.770 --> 00:42:56.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:56.560 --> 00:42:57.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:42:57.060 --> 00:42:59.750 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:42:59.750 --> 00:43:02.370 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:43:02.370 --> 00:43:03.413 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:43:03.413 --> 00:43:04.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:04.320 --> 00:43:04.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:04.880 --> 00:43:05.893 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:43:05.893 --> 00:43:06.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:06.520 --> 00:43:07.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:07.020 --> 00:43:08.190 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:43:08.190 --> 00:43:08.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:08.940 --> 00:43:09.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:09.480 --> 00:43:10.400 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:43:10.400 --> 00:43:11.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:11.100 --> 00:43:11.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:11.610 --> 00:43:12.300 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:43:12.300 --> 00:43:13.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:13.240 --> 00:43:13.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:13.740 --> 00:43:14.850 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:43:14.850 --> 00:43:15.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:15.540 --> 00:43:16.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:16.110 --> 00:43:16.830 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:43:16.830 --> 00:43:17.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:17.890 --> 00:43:18.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:18.750 --> 00:43:19.530 align:middle line:90% Rodriguez? 00:43:19.530 --> 00:43:20.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:20.800 --> 00:43:21.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:21.400 --> 00:43:22.294 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:43:22.294 --> 00:43:23.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:23.190 --> 00:43:23.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:23.730 --> 00:43:26.616 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:43:26.616 --> 00:43:28.540 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:43:28.540 --> 00:43:29.502 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:43:29.502 --> 00:43:30.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:30.470 --> 00:43:31.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:31.230 --> 00:43:31.960 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:43:31.960 --> 00:43:33.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:33.160 --> 00:43:34.197 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:34.197 --> 00:43:36.532 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:43:36.532 --> 00:43:37.940 align:middle line:90% No. 00:43:37.940 --> 00:43:38.500 align:middle line:90% No. 00:43:38.500 --> 00:43:39.533 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:43:39.533 --> 00:43:40.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:40.300 --> 00:43:41.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:41.550 --> 00:43:42.708 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:43:42.708 --> 00:43:44.202 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:43:44.202 --> 00:43:45.572 align:middle line:90% 31 to one. 00:43:45.572 --> 00:43:47.030 align:middle line:84% Have all the members been recorded? 00:43:47.030 --> 00:43:50.024 align:middle line:90% No. 00:43:50.024 --> 00:43:51.521 align:middle line:90% Senator Cyr? 00:43:51.521 --> 00:43:54.515 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:43:54.515 --> 00:43:57.009 align:middle line:90% Cyr votes yes. 00:43:57.009 --> 00:43:57.995 align:middle line:90% Senator Keenan? 00:43:57.995 --> 00:43:59.970 align:middle line:90% I wish to be recorded. 00:43:59.970 --> 00:44:00.920 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:44:00.920 --> 00:44:01.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:44:01.420 --> 00:44:02.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:44:02.360 --> 00:44:03.984 align:middle line:90% Senator Eldridge? 00:44:03.984 --> 00:44:06.400 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:44:06.400 --> 00:44:07.210 align:middle line:90% Eldridge. 00:44:07.210 --> 00:44:08.584 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:44:08.584 --> 00:44:11.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:44:11.340 --> 00:44:13.370 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, senator Chandler? 00:44:13.370 --> 00:44:16.130 align:middle line:90% 00:44:16.130 --> 00:44:17.330 align:middle line:90% Chandler votes yes. 00:44:17.330 --> 00:44:20.824 align:middle line:84% Senator from 2nd Essex and Middlesex, senator L'Italien? 00:44:20.824 --> 00:44:23.276 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:44:23.276 --> 00:44:23.776 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:44:23.776 --> 00:44:25.252 align:middle line:90% L'Italien votes yes. 00:44:25.252 --> 00:44:28.204 align:middle line:90% 00:44:28.204 --> 00:44:29.680 align:middle line:90% Yep. 00:44:29.680 --> 00:44:32.632 align:middle line:90% 36 to [INAUDIBLE]. 00:44:32.632 --> 00:44:35.092 align:middle line:90% Yes, yes. 00:44:35.092 --> 00:44:39.040 align:middle line:84% 36 in the affirmative, one in the negative. 00:44:39.040 --> 00:44:41.200 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 36 members having 00:44:41.200 --> 00:44:43.000 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, one member 00:44:43.000 --> 00:44:45.670 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 00:44:45.670 --> 00:44:47.860 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:44:47.860 --> 00:44:50.140 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:44:50.140 --> 00:44:52.860 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:44:52.860 --> 00:44:54.920 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:44:54.920 --> 00:44:58.360 align:middle line:84% Item 4516-1037 contained in section two 00:44:58.360 --> 00:45:01.472 align:middle line:84% relative to mobile integrated health retained revenue 00:45:01.472 --> 00:45:03.180 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 00:45:03.180 --> 00:45:05.740 align:middle line:84% this item has passed notwithstanding the disapproval 00:45:05.740 --> 00:45:08.860 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 118 to 34. 00:45:08.860 --> 00:45:10.360 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 00:45:10.360 --> 00:45:12.820 align:middle line:84% shall the item pass notwithstanding the objection 00:45:12.820 --> 00:45:14.230 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 00:45:14.230 --> 00:45:15.532 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:45:15.532 --> 00:45:18.840 align:middle line:90% 00:45:18.840 --> 00:45:20.540 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:45:20.540 --> 00:45:21.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:21.490 --> 00:45:22.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:22.220 --> 00:45:23.090 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:45:23.090 --> 00:45:23.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:23.950 --> 00:45:24.991 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:24.991 --> 00:45:27.820 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:45:27.820 --> 00:45:28.641 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:45:28.641 --> 00:45:29.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:29.140 --> 00:45:30.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:30.060 --> 00:45:30.947 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:45:30.947 --> 00:45:32.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:32.350 --> 00:45:33.272 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:33.272 --> 00:45:33.772 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:45:33.772 --> 00:45:37.660 align:middle line:90% 00:45:37.660 --> 00:45:38.710 align:middle line:90% Chang-diaz? 00:45:38.710 --> 00:45:40.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:40.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:40.540 --> 00:45:41.200 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:45:41.200 --> 00:45:42.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:42.010 --> 00:45:42.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:42.610 --> 00:45:43.481 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:45:43.481 --> 00:45:43.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:43.980 --> 00:45:44.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:44.520 --> 00:45:45.260 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:45:45.260 --> 00:45:46.270 align:middle line:90% No. 00:45:46.270 --> 00:45:47.560 align:middle line:90% No DiDomenico? 00:45:47.560 --> 00:45:48.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:48.370 --> 00:45:48.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:48.940 --> 00:45:49.720 align:middle line:90% Donogue? 00:45:49.720 --> 00:45:50.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:50.650 --> 00:45:51.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:51.580 --> 00:45:52.783 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:45:52.783 --> 00:45:53.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:53.600 --> 00:45:54.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:54.100 --> 00:45:54.760 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:45:54.760 --> 00:45:55.510 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:45:55.510 --> 00:45:56.470 align:middle line:90% No. 00:45:56.470 --> 00:45:57.050 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:45:57.050 --> 00:45:58.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:58.000 --> 00:45:58.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:45:58.570 --> 00:45:59.710 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:45:59.710 --> 00:46:00.610 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:46:00.610 --> 00:46:01.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:01.350 --> 00:46:01.850 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:46:01.850 --> 00:46:02.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:02.770 --> 00:46:03.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:03.280 --> 00:46:04.060 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:46:04.060 --> 00:46:04.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:04.850 --> 00:46:06.590 align:middle line:90% Yes Humason? 00:46:06.590 --> 00:46:07.330 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:07.330 --> 00:46:08.110 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:08.110 --> 00:46:09.286 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:46:09.286 --> 00:46:10.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:10.180 --> 00:46:10.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:10.750 --> 00:46:11.740 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:46:11.740 --> 00:46:12.730 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:46:12.730 --> 00:46:13.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:13.360 --> 00:46:13.990 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:46:13.990 --> 00:46:14.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:14.740 --> 00:46:15.714 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:15.714 --> 00:46:17.690 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:46:17.690 --> 00:46:20.160 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:46:20.160 --> 00:46:21.142 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:46:21.142 --> 00:46:21.642 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:21.642 --> 00:46:22.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:22.630 --> 00:46:23.618 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:46:23.618 --> 00:46:24.606 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:24.606 --> 00:46:25.594 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:25.594 --> 00:46:27.564 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:46:27.564 --> 00:46:28.064 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:46:28.064 --> 00:46:29.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:29.070 --> 00:46:30.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:30.790 --> 00:46:32.130 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:46:32.130 --> 00:46:32.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:32.850 --> 00:46:33.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:33.640 --> 00:46:34.140 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:46:34.140 --> 00:46:35.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:35.100 --> 00:46:35.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:35.850 --> 00:46:36.876 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:46:36.876 --> 00:46:37.550 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:37.550 --> 00:46:38.340 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:38.340 --> 00:46:39.280 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:46:39.280 --> 00:46:40.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:40.150 --> 00:46:40.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:40.760 --> 00:46:41.850 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:46:41.850 --> 00:46:42.991 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:42.991 --> 00:46:43.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:43.490 --> 00:46:44.590 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:46:44.590 --> 00:46:45.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:45.090 --> 00:46:45.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:45.940 --> 00:46:46.976 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:46:46.976 --> 00:46:48.720 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:48.720 --> 00:46:50.080 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:50.080 --> 00:46:51.434 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:46:51.434 --> 00:46:52.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:52.230 --> 00:46:53.334 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:53.334 --> 00:46:54.222 align:middle line:90% Svilka? 00:46:54.222 --> 00:46:55.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:55.110 --> 00:46:56.115 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:46:56.115 --> 00:46:57.330 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:46:57.330 --> 00:46:58.170 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:58.170 --> 00:46:59.010 align:middle line:90% No. 00:46:59.010 --> 00:46:59.720 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:46:59.720 --> 00:47:00.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:00.930 --> 00:47:01.957 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:01.957 --> 00:47:02.829 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:47:02.829 --> 00:47:03.328 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:03.328 --> 00:47:04.699 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:04.699 --> 00:47:06.530 align:middle line:90% OK, 29 to six. 00:47:06.530 --> 00:47:07.582 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:47:07.582 --> 00:47:08.082 align:middle line:90% I lost one. 00:47:08.082 --> 00:47:11.194 align:middle line:84% Yeah, senator from Worcester, senator Chandler. 00:47:11.194 --> 00:47:11.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:11.970 --> 00:47:15.540 align:middle line:90% Chandler votes yes. 00:47:15.540 --> 00:47:16.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:47:16.040 --> 00:47:18.950 align:middle line:90% Senator Lewis? 00:47:18.950 --> 00:47:19.920 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:47:19.920 --> 00:47:20.890 align:middle line:90% You have not. 00:47:20.890 --> 00:47:22.830 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] in the affirmative. 00:47:22.830 --> 00:47:26.225 align:middle line:90% Lewis votes yes. 00:47:26.225 --> 00:47:27.195 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:47:27.195 --> 00:47:29.069 align:middle line:90% What was the vote now? 00:47:29.069 --> 00:47:30.360 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:47:30.360 --> 00:47:40.520 align:middle line:90% 00:47:40.520 --> 00:47:42.860 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 members having 00:47:42.860 --> 00:47:45.290 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative six members 00:47:45.290 --> 00:47:46.800 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 00:47:46.800 --> 00:47:48.890 align:middle line:84% The item passes not withstanding the objection 00:47:48.890 --> 00:47:51.110 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:47:51.110 --> 00:47:53.400 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:47:53.400 --> 00:47:55.370 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:47:55.370 --> 00:47:58.880 align:middle line:84% Item 4516-1039 contained in section two 00:47:58.880 --> 00:48:01.580 align:middle line:84% relative to health care industry plan review retain 00:48:01.580 --> 00:48:03.850 align:middle line:84% revenue comes from the House with the endorsement 00:48:03.850 --> 00:48:05.839 align:middle line:84% that the House has passed this item 00:48:05.839 --> 00:48:07.880 align:middle line:84% notwithstanding the disapproval of his excellency 00:48:07.880 --> 00:48:09.629 align:middle line:90% the governor 117 to 35. 00:48:09.629 --> 00:48:11.670 align:middle line:84% A senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, senator-- 00:48:11.670 --> 00:48:15.156 align:middle line:90% 00:48:15.156 --> 00:48:16.650 align:middle line:90% DeMacedo. 00:48:16.650 --> 00:48:17.605 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:48:17.605 --> 00:48:18.730 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:48:18.730 --> 00:48:24.080 align:middle line:84% Again, I'm rising in regards to line item 4516-1039, 00:48:24.080 --> 00:48:27.560 align:middle line:84% the health care industry plan review program. 00:48:27.560 --> 00:48:34.990 align:middle line:84% This is new program and it was at $200,000. 00:48:34.990 --> 00:48:37.600 align:middle line:84% It was eliminated by the administration. 00:48:37.600 --> 00:48:39.160 align:middle line:84% We in the Senate did not include it 00:48:39.160 --> 00:48:40.690 align:middle line:90% in our version of the budget. 00:48:40.690 --> 00:48:43.441 align:middle line:84% And I'm hoping we might get an explanation of why we believe 00:48:43.441 --> 00:48:44.440 align:middle line:90% it should be overridden. 00:48:44.440 --> 00:48:45.322 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:48:45.322 --> 00:48:48.180 align:middle line:90% 00:48:48.180 --> 00:48:51.360 align:middle line:84% This veto eliminates in totality the health care 00:48:51.360 --> 00:48:55.770 align:middle line:84% industry retained revenue accounted $200,000. 00:48:55.770 --> 00:48:57.930 align:middle line:84% This is a new retained revenue account 00:48:57.930 --> 00:49:00.960 align:middle line:84% that would be used to support the recently 00:49:00.960 --> 00:49:06.240 align:middle line:84% revised DPH's determination of need program and health 00:49:06.240 --> 00:49:09.130 align:middle line:90% care facility plan review. 00:49:09.130 --> 00:49:11.010 align:middle line:84% So it's part of the new process that 00:49:11.010 --> 00:49:15.750 align:middle line:84% allows DPH to retain a portion of the existing 00:49:15.750 --> 00:49:18.990 align:middle line:84% determination of need application fees 00:49:18.990 --> 00:49:22.620 align:middle line:84% to ensure that the applications are reviewed 00:49:22.620 --> 00:49:25.240 align:middle line:84% in a comprehensive and timely manner. 00:49:25.240 --> 00:49:27.548 align:middle line:84% So I ask that you overturn the veto. 00:49:27.548 --> 00:49:31.500 align:middle line:90% 00:49:31.500 --> 00:49:32.670 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:49:32.670 --> 00:49:34.486 align:middle line:90% The question before the Senate-- 00:49:34.486 --> 00:49:37.282 align:middle line:90% the clerk will call the roll. 00:49:37.282 --> 00:49:38.647 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:49:38.647 --> 00:49:39.146 align:middle line:90% Roll call. 00:49:39.146 --> 00:49:40.550 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 00:49:40.550 --> 00:49:41.345 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:41.345 --> 00:49:42.115 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:42.115 --> 00:49:43.700 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:49:43.700 --> 00:49:44.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:44.200 --> 00:49:45.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:45.100 --> 00:49:45.660 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:49:45.660 --> 00:49:46.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:46.170 --> 00:49:46.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:46.670 --> 00:49:47.450 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:49:47.450 --> 00:49:48.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:48.150 --> 00:49:48.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:48.650 --> 00:49:49.561 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:49:49.561 --> 00:49:50.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:50.060 --> 00:49:50.559 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:50.559 --> 00:49:51.440 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:49:51.440 --> 00:49:52.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:52.020 --> 00:49:52.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:52.520 --> 00:49:53.150 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:49:53.150 --> 00:49:53.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:53.690 --> 00:49:54.682 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:54.682 --> 00:49:55.182 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:49:55.182 --> 00:49:55.682 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:49:55.682 --> 00:49:57.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 00:49:57.860 --> 00:49:58.700 align:middle line:90% No. 00:49:58.700 --> 00:49:59.780 align:middle line:90% No. 00:49:59.780 --> 00:50:00.455 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:50:00.455 --> 00:50:00.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:00.710 --> 00:50:01.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:01.210 --> 00:50:02.060 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:50:02.060 --> 00:50:02.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:02.890 --> 00:50:03.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:03.470 --> 00:50:04.220 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:50:04.220 --> 00:50:04.761 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:04.761 --> 00:50:05.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:05.260 --> 00:50:07.630 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:50:07.630 --> 00:50:08.580 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:50:08.580 --> 00:50:09.535 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:09.535 --> 00:50:10.450 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:50:10.450 --> 00:50:11.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:11.250 --> 00:50:11.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:11.760 --> 00:50:12.480 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:50:12.480 --> 00:50:13.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:13.230 --> 00:50:13.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:13.730 --> 00:50:14.500 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:50:14.500 --> 00:50:15.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:15.150 --> 00:50:15.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:15.760 --> 00:50:16.470 align:middle line:90% Hines? 00:50:16.470 --> 00:50:17.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:17.100 --> 00:50:17.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:17.890 --> 00:50:18.390 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:50:18.390 --> 00:50:19.260 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:19.260 --> 00:50:19.930 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:19.930 --> 00:50:20.450 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:50:20.450 --> 00:50:21.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:21.380 --> 00:50:22.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:22.060 --> 00:50:22.710 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:50:22.710 --> 00:50:23.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:23.520 --> 00:50:24.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:24.030 --> 00:50:26.410 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:50:26.410 --> 00:50:28.314 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:50:28.314 --> 00:50:29.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:29.750 --> 00:50:30.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:30.420 --> 00:50:30.980 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:50:30.980 --> 00:50:31.545 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:31.545 --> 00:50:32.045 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:32.045 --> 00:50:33.080 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:50:33.080 --> 00:50:33.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:33.860 --> 00:50:34.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:34.520 --> 00:50:35.510 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:50:35.510 --> 00:50:36.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:36.370 --> 00:50:37.261 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:37.261 --> 00:50:39.105 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:50:39.105 --> 00:50:40.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:40.950 --> 00:50:41.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:41.700 --> 00:50:42.300 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:50:42.300 --> 00:50:43.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:43.210 --> 00:50:43.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:43.870 --> 00:50:44.736 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:50:44.736 --> 00:50:45.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:45.460 --> 00:50:45.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:45.960 --> 00:50:47.146 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:50:47.146 --> 00:50:48.134 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:48.134 --> 00:50:48.634 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:48.634 --> 00:50:49.626 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:50:49.626 --> 00:50:50.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:50.620 --> 00:50:51.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:51.310 --> 00:50:52.540 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:50:52.540 --> 00:50:53.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:53.500 --> 00:50:54.421 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:54.421 --> 00:50:54.920 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:50:54.920 --> 00:50:56.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:50:56.300 --> 00:50:57.220 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:50:57.220 --> 00:50:58.140 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:58.140 --> 00:50:58.930 align:middle line:90% No. 00:50:58.930 --> 00:50:59.500 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:50:59.500 --> 00:51:00.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:00.610 --> 00:51:01.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:01.730 --> 00:51:02.230 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:51:02.230 --> 00:51:02.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:02.730 --> 00:51:03.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:03.230 --> 00:51:04.230 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:51:04.230 --> 00:51:05.230 align:middle line:90% No. 00:51:05.230 --> 00:51:05.990 align:middle line:90% No. 00:51:05.990 --> 00:51:07.176 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:51:07.176 --> 00:51:07.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:07.890 --> 00:51:08.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:08.520 --> 00:51:09.253 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:51:09.253 --> 00:51:10.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:10.080 --> 00:51:12.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:51:12.490 --> 00:51:16.274 align:middle line:84% Have all-- sorry, have all members been recorded? 00:51:16.274 --> 00:51:17.238 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:51:17.238 --> 00:51:21.100 align:middle line:90% 00:51:21.100 --> 00:51:24.580 align:middle line:84% On this matter 31 members having voted in the affirmative, 00:51:24.580 --> 00:51:26.720 align:middle line:84% six members having voted in the negative. 00:51:26.720 --> 00:51:29.320 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:51:29.320 --> 00:51:31.270 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:51:31.270 --> 00:51:33.160 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:51:33.160 --> 00:51:34.854 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:51:34.854 --> 00:51:38.290 align:middle line:84% Item 4590-0250 contained in section two 00:51:38.290 --> 00:51:40.884 align:middle line:84% relative to school based health programs 00:51:40.884 --> 00:51:42.550 align:middle line:84% comes from the Hose with the endorsement 00:51:42.550 --> 00:51:44.320 align:middle line:84% that the House has passed this item not withstanding 00:51:44.320 --> 00:51:46.819 align:middle line:84% the reduction and objections of his excellency the governor, 00:51:46.819 --> 00:51:48.604 align:middle line:90% 121 to 33. 00:51:48.604 --> 00:51:50.020 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 00:51:50.020 --> 00:51:52.360 align:middle line:84% shall the item pass notwithstanding the objection 00:51:52.360 --> 00:51:54.690 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 00:51:54.690 --> 00:51:58.660 align:middle line:84% The senator from 1st Essex and Middlesex, senator Tarr. 00:51:58.660 --> 00:52:01.330 align:middle line:84% Well, well, well, Madam President, what a wonderful job 00:52:01.330 --> 00:52:05.452 align:middle line:84% you are doing in your persistent leadership at the rostrum. 00:52:05.452 --> 00:52:06.910 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I'm hoping that we 00:52:06.910 --> 00:52:10.930 align:middle line:84% can get an explanation of this particular item, which 00:52:10.930 --> 00:52:13.800 align:middle line:84% seems to involve school based health programs. 00:52:13.800 --> 00:52:17.920 align:middle line:84% And if we're being asked to override the veto that we 00:52:17.920 --> 00:52:20.860 align:middle line:84% can get an explanation of why that request is being made. 00:52:20.860 --> 00:52:22.480 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:52:22.480 --> 00:52:23.890 align:middle line:90% Senator Spilka. 00:52:23.890 --> 00:52:26.980 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate two local priorities 00:52:26.980 --> 00:52:30.120 align:middle line:84% in the school based health program account totaling 00:52:30.120 --> 00:52:32.670 align:middle line:90% $200,000. 00:52:32.670 --> 00:52:35.200 align:middle line:84% These priorities include a school 00:52:35.200 --> 00:52:39.850 align:middle line:84% based health center in Malden and the Massachusetts 00:52:39.850 --> 00:52:43.270 align:middle line:90% model of community coalitions. 00:52:43.270 --> 00:52:47.200 align:middle line:84% These programs contribute to the mission of school based health 00:52:47.200 --> 00:52:50.570 align:middle line:84% program and offer comprehensive health services 00:52:50.570 --> 00:52:52.473 align:middle line:84% so we ask that you overturn the veto. 00:52:52.473 --> 00:52:56.370 align:middle line:90% 00:52:56.370 --> 00:52:57.690 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 00:52:57.690 --> 00:52:59.780 align:middle line:90% 3:45. 00:52:59.780 --> 00:53:00.796 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:53:00.796 --> 00:53:01.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:01.690 --> 00:53:02.435 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:02.435 --> 00:53:04.905 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:53:04.905 --> 00:53:05.405 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:53:05.405 --> 00:53:06.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:06.400 --> 00:53:07.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:07.320 --> 00:53:07.970 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:53:07.970 --> 00:53:08.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:08.640 --> 00:53:09.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:09.360 --> 00:53:10.720 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:53:10.720 --> 00:53:11.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:11.320 --> 00:53:11.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:11.860 --> 00:53:12.560 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:53:12.560 --> 00:53:13.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:13.190 --> 00:53:13.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:13.890 --> 00:53:14.890 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:53:14.890 --> 00:53:15.600 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:15.600 --> 00:53:16.240 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:16.240 --> 00:53:17.180 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:53:17.180 --> 00:53:17.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:17.860 --> 00:53:18.486 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:18.486 --> 00:53:18.986 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:53:18.986 --> 00:53:19.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:19.740 --> 00:53:20.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:20.260 --> 00:53:21.190 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:53:21.190 --> 00:53:21.860 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:21.860 --> 00:53:22.400 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:22.400 --> 00:53:22.900 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 00:53:22.900 --> 00:53:23.750 align:middle line:90% Dominika 00:53:23.750 --> 00:53:24.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:24.250 --> 00:53:24.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:24.750 --> 00:53:25.690 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:53:25.690 --> 00:53:26.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:26.560 --> 00:53:27.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:27.130 --> 00:53:27.630 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:53:27.630 --> 00:53:28.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:28.800 --> 00:53:29.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:29.360 --> 00:53:30.310 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:53:30.310 --> 00:53:30.990 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:30.990 --> 00:53:31.930 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:31.930 --> 00:53:32.510 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:53:32.510 --> 00:53:33.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:33.200 --> 00:53:33.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:33.700 --> 00:53:36.480 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:53:36.480 --> 00:53:36.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:36.980 --> 00:53:38.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:38.150 --> 00:53:39.035 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:53:39.035 --> 00:53:39.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:39.600 --> 00:53:40.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:40.100 --> 00:53:40.900 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:53:40.900 --> 00:53:41.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:41.580 --> 00:53:42.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:42.340 --> 00:53:43.110 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:53:43.110 --> 00:53:44.210 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:44.210 --> 00:53:44.830 align:middle line:90% No. 00:53:44.830 --> 00:53:45.470 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:53:45.470 --> 00:53:46.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:46.400 --> 00:53:47.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:47.050 --> 00:53:47.720 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:53:47.720 --> 00:53:48.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:48.470 --> 00:53:49.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:49.120 --> 00:53:49.810 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:53:49.810 --> 00:53:50.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:50.630 --> 00:53:51.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:51.530 --> 00:53:52.190 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:53:52.190 --> 00:53:52.815 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:52.815 --> 00:53:53.315 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:53.315 --> 00:53:54.290 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 00:53:54.290 --> 00:53:55.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:55.190 --> 00:53:55.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:53:55.730 --> 00:53:58.538 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:53:58.538 --> 00:54:00.878 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:54:00.878 --> 00:54:01.820 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:54:01.820 --> 00:54:03.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:03.300 --> 00:54:03.960 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:54:03.960 --> 00:54:05.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:05.250 --> 00:54:05.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:05.780 --> 00:54:06.650 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:54:06.650 --> 00:54:07.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:07.580 --> 00:54:08.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:08.420 --> 00:54:09.346 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:54:09.346 --> 00:54:10.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:10.280 --> 00:54:10.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:10.850 --> 00:54:12.050 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:54:12.050 --> 00:54:13.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:13.010 --> 00:54:13.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:13.640 --> 00:54:14.720 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:54:14.720 --> 00:54:15.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:15.480 --> 00:54:16.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:16.220 --> 00:54:17.223 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:54:17.223 --> 00:54:18.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:18.170 --> 00:54:20.030 align:middle line:90% Yes Rodrigues? 00:54:20.030 --> 00:54:21.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:21.170 --> 00:54:21.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:21.710 --> 00:54:22.910 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:54:22.910 --> 00:54:23.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:23.870 --> 00:54:24.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:24.570 --> 00:54:25.070 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:54:25.070 --> 00:54:25.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:25.910 --> 00:54:26.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:26.710 --> 00:54:27.210 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:54:27.210 --> 00:54:28.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:28.010 --> 00:54:28.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:28.760 --> 00:54:30.128 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:54:30.128 --> 00:54:31.370 align:middle line:90% No. 00:54:31.370 --> 00:54:32.630 align:middle line:90% No. 00:54:32.630 --> 00:54:33.590 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:54:33.590 --> 00:54:34.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:34.370 --> 00:54:35.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:35.330 --> 00:54:37.230 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:54:37.230 --> 00:54:37.730 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:54:37.730 --> 00:54:38.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:38.690 --> 00:54:39.199 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:39.199 --> 00:54:40.490 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:54:40.490 --> 00:54:41.976 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 00:54:41.976 --> 00:54:51.396 align:middle line:90% 00:54:51.396 --> 00:54:51.896 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:54:51.896 --> 00:54:55.870 align:middle line:90% 00:54:55.870 --> 00:54:59.440 align:middle line:84% 32 on this members having voted in the affirmative five members 00:54:59.440 --> 00:55:01.100 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 00:55:01.100 --> 00:55:03.190 align:middle line:84% The item passes not withstanding the objection 00:55:03.190 --> 00:55:05.370 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:55:05.370 --> 00:55:07.090 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:55:07.090 --> 00:55:08.640 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 00:55:08.640 --> 00:55:13.510 align:middle line:84% Item 4590-0915 contained in section two 00:55:13.510 --> 00:55:16.582 align:middle line:84% relative to DPH hospital operations come from the House 00:55:16.582 --> 00:55:18.040 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement that this item 00:55:18.040 --> 00:55:21.010 align:middle line:84% has passed notwithstanding the reduction and objections 00:55:21.010 --> 00:55:25.720 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 121 to 33. 00:55:25.720 --> 00:55:27.520 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall 00:55:27.520 --> 00:55:30.100 align:middle line:84% the item pass not withstanding the objection of the governor 00:55:30.100 --> 00:55:31.576 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 00:55:31.576 --> 00:55:34.490 align:middle line:90% Oh, again, senator Tarr. 00:55:34.490 --> 00:55:36.880 align:middle line:84% Well, why thank you for recognizing 00:55:36.880 --> 00:55:39.490 align:middle line:84% me, Madam President, and through you to the members. 00:55:39.490 --> 00:55:42.490 align:middle line:84% Madam President, I know once again at majority microphone 00:55:42.490 --> 00:55:44.710 align:middle line:84% there's a bit of a conference taking place 00:55:44.710 --> 00:55:47.320 align:middle line:84% and I am pained to interrupt that. 00:55:47.320 --> 00:55:50.980 align:middle line:84% But I do hope that we can get an explanation of the pending 00:55:50.980 --> 00:55:54.550 align:middle line:84% item which has been vetoed by his excellency the governor. 00:55:54.550 --> 00:55:57.130 align:middle line:84% And perhaps an explanation of why 00:55:57.130 --> 00:55:59.200 align:middle line:84% we are being asked to override, if we 00:55:59.200 --> 00:56:01.270 align:middle line:84% are in fact being asked to override, 00:56:01.270 --> 00:56:03.150 align:middle line:90% notwithstanding his objections. 00:56:03.150 --> 00:56:04.810 align:middle line:84% I look forward to the explanation. 00:56:04.810 --> 00:56:07.290 align:middle line:84% The senator for Middlesex and Norfolk. 00:56:07.290 --> 00:56:10.915 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate $150,000 in funding 00:56:10.915 --> 00:56:15.070 align:middle line:84% for a summer program at the Pappas Rehabilitation 00:56:15.070 --> 00:56:20.830 align:middle line:84% hospital for children in the DPH hospital operations account. 00:56:20.830 --> 00:56:24.880 align:middle line:84% This program provides medical, educational, recreational, 00:56:24.880 --> 00:56:27.400 align:middle line:84% transitional and complementary alternative 00:56:27.400 --> 00:56:30.850 align:middle line:84% medical services for children and young adults 00:56:30.850 --> 00:56:33.970 align:middle line:84% with multiple disabilities, assisting 00:56:33.970 --> 00:56:37.720 align:middle line:84% them to achieve their optimal level for independence. 00:56:37.720 --> 00:56:41.710 align:middle line:84% It's really an important program for so many children 00:56:41.710 --> 00:56:46.600 align:middle line:84% and young adults and therefore I ask that you overturn the veto. 00:56:46.600 --> 00:56:48.160 align:middle line:84% And the clerk will call the roll. 00:56:48.160 --> 00:56:50.900 align:middle line:90% 00:56:50.900 --> 00:56:53.852 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 00:56:53.852 --> 00:56:54.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:54.840 --> 00:56:55.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:55.470 --> 00:56:56.770 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 00:56:56.770 --> 00:56:57.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:57.280 --> 00:56:57.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:57.950 --> 00:56:58.580 align:middle line:90% Brady? 00:56:58.580 --> 00:56:59.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:59.360 --> 00:56:59.913 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:56:59.913 --> 00:57:00.454 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 00:57:00.454 --> 00:57:01.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:01.160 --> 00:57:01.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:01.820 --> 00:57:02.510 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 00:57:02.510 --> 00:57:03.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:03.290 --> 00:57:03.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:03.800 --> 00:57:04.760 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 00:57:04.760 --> 00:57:05.390 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:57:05.390 --> 00:57:06.060 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:06.060 --> 00:57:06.680 align:middle line:90% Creem? 00:57:06.680 --> 00:57:07.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:07.190 --> 00:57:07.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:07.810 --> 00:57:08.583 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 00:57:08.583 --> 00:57:09.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:09.470 --> 00:57:10.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:10.410 --> 00:57:11.291 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 00:57:11.291 --> 00:57:11.790 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:11.790 --> 00:57:13.010 align:middle line:90% No. diDomenica? 00:57:13.010 --> 00:57:13.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:13.770 --> 00:57:14.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:14.270 --> 00:57:15.280 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 00:57:15.280 --> 00:57:16.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:16.010 --> 00:57:17.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:17.060 --> 00:57:17.840 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 00:57:17.840 --> 00:57:19.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:19.050 --> 00:57:19.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:19.590 --> 00:57:20.100 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 00:57:20.100 --> 00:57:20.880 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:20.880 --> 00:57:21.770 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:21.770 --> 00:57:22.300 align:middle line:90% Forry? 00:57:22.300 --> 00:57:23.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:23.540 --> 00:57:24.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:24.080 --> 00:57:25.103 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 00:57:25.103 --> 00:57:25.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:25.850 --> 00:57:26.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:26.390 --> 00:57:27.030 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 00:57:27.030 --> 00:57:27.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:27.860 --> 00:57:28.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:28.380 --> 00:57:29.210 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 00:57:29.210 --> 00:57:29.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:29.900 --> 00:57:30.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:30.540 --> 00:57:31.190 align:middle line:90% Humason? 00:57:31.190 --> 00:57:32.070 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:32.070 --> 00:57:32.570 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:32.570 --> 00:57:33.770 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 00:57:33.770 --> 00:57:34.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:34.750 --> 00:57:35.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:35.450 --> 00:57:36.190 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 00:57:36.190 --> 00:57:37.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:37.190 --> 00:57:37.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:37.700 --> 00:57:38.320 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 00:57:38.320 --> 00:57:39.248 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:39.248 --> 00:57:39.748 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:39.748 --> 00:57:42.100 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:57:42.100 --> 00:57:42.600 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 00:57:42.600 --> 00:57:43.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:43.210 --> 00:57:43.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:43.710 --> 00:57:44.630 align:middle line:90% L'Italien 00:57:44.630 --> 00:57:45.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:45.130 --> 00:57:46.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:46.080 --> 00:57:46.970 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 00:57:46.970 --> 00:57:47.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:47.470 --> 00:57:48.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:48.040 --> 00:57:48.894 align:middle line:90% McGee? 00:57:48.894 --> 00:57:49.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:49.750 --> 00:57:50.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:50.500 --> 00:57:51.060 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 00:57:51.060 --> 00:57:52.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:52.000 --> 00:57:52.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:52.620 --> 00:57:53.523 align:middle line:90% Moore? 00:57:53.523 --> 00:57:54.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:54.250 --> 00:57:54.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:57:54.870 --> 00:57:55.369 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:57:55.369 --> 00:57:57.730 align:middle line:90% 00:57:57.730 --> 00:57:59.070 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 00:57:59.070 --> 00:57:59.980 align:middle line:90% No. 00:57:59.980 --> 00:58:00.941 align:middle line:90% No. 00:58:00.941 --> 00:58:02.294 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 00:58:02.294 --> 00:58:03.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:03.200 --> 00:58:03.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:03.830 --> 00:58:05.470 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 00:58:05.470 --> 00:58:06.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:06.300 --> 00:58:07.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:07.090 --> 00:58:07.830 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 00:58:07.830 --> 00:58:09.285 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:09.285 --> 00:58:10.255 align:middle line:90% Ross? 00:58:10.255 --> 00:58:11.210 align:middle line:90% No. 00:58:11.210 --> 00:58:11.710 align:middle line:90% No. 00:58:11.710 --> 00:58:12.680 align:middle line:90% Rush? 00:58:12.680 --> 00:58:13.635 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:13.635 --> 00:58:14.135 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:14.135 --> 00:58:15.105 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 00:58:15.105 --> 00:58:16.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:16.090 --> 00:58:16.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:16.900 --> 00:58:18.264 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 00:58:18.264 --> 00:58:19.030 align:middle line:90% No. 00:58:19.030 --> 00:58:19.660 align:middle line:90% No. 00:58:19.660 --> 00:58:20.780 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 00:58:20.780 --> 00:58:21.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:21.580 --> 00:58:22.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:22.210 --> 00:58:23.926 align:middle line:90% Welch? 00:58:23.926 --> 00:58:24.426 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:24.426 --> 00:58:26.394 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:26.394 --> 00:58:27.870 align:middle line:84% Have all the members been recorded? 00:58:27.870 --> 00:58:29.346 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:58:29.346 --> 00:58:30.814 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:58:30.814 --> 00:58:31.314 align:middle line:90% How many? 00:58:31.314 --> 00:58:32.298 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:58:32.298 --> 00:58:36.610 align:middle line:90% 00:58:36.610 --> 00:58:38.680 align:middle line:84% On this manner, 30 members having 00:58:38.680 --> 00:58:40.750 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, seven members 00:58:40.750 --> 00:58:42.050 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 00:58:42.050 --> 00:58:44.770 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objection 00:58:44.770 --> 00:58:47.230 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 00:58:47.230 --> 00:58:49.010 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 00:58:49.010 --> 00:58:50.492 align:middle line:90% Should I call a recess? 00:58:50.492 --> 00:58:52.947 align:middle line:84% The senate will be in a brief recess. 00:58:52.947 --> 00:58:55.893 align:middle line:90% 00:58:55.893 --> 00:58:57.366 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 00:58:57.366 --> 00:59:09.670 align:middle line:90% 00:59:09.670 --> 00:59:14.120 align:middle line:84% Item 4590-0925 contained in section two 00:59:14.120 --> 00:59:16.700 align:middle line:84% relative to prostate cancer research comes from the House 00:59:16.700 --> 00:59:18.220 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement this item has 00:59:18.220 --> 00:59:20.960 align:middle line:84% passed notwithstanding the reduction of his excellency 00:59:20.960 --> 00:59:23.540 align:middle line:90% the governor, 133 to 19. 00:59:23.540 --> 00:59:26.060 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall the item 00:59:26.060 --> 00:59:28.820 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objection of the governor 00:59:28.820 --> 00:59:30.390 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 00:59:30.390 --> 00:59:34.190 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth and Barnstable, mister deMacedo. 00:59:34.190 --> 00:59:35.540 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam President. 00:59:35.540 --> 00:59:38.990 align:middle line:84% And a quick question in regard to this particular line 00:59:38.990 --> 00:59:45.020 align:middle line:84% item, 4590-0925, prostate research program. 00:59:45.020 --> 00:59:47.000 align:middle line:84% The governor had an action in regards 00:59:47.000 --> 00:59:49.125 align:middle line:90% to a $275,000 reduction. 00:59:49.125 --> 00:59:50.750 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping we might get an explanation. 00:59:50.750 --> 00:59:53.390 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:59:53.390 --> 00:59:54.620 align:middle line:90% Senator Spilka. 00:59:54.620 --> 00:59:58.040 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce the prostate cancer research 00:59:58.040 --> 01:00:01.970 align:middle line:84% and prevention account by $275,000, 01:00:01.970 --> 01:00:06.030 align:middle line:84% cutting the account's appropriation in half. 01:00:06.030 --> 01:00:08.330 align:middle line:84% The account funds statewide programs, 01:00:08.330 --> 01:00:12.740 align:middle line:84% is a major senate priority, and has been for many years. 01:00:12.740 --> 01:00:15.350 align:middle line:84% It oversees public awareness campaigns 01:00:15.350 --> 01:00:18.020 align:middle line:84% for prevention against prostate cancer 01:00:18.020 --> 01:00:22.130 align:middle line:84% with particular attention to men that are high risk. 01:00:22.130 --> 01:00:26.090 align:middle line:84% This is an area of cancer that, if caught early, 01:00:26.090 --> 01:00:30.980 align:middle line:84% can be cured so it's really important that we override 01:00:30.980 --> 01:00:35.195 align:middle line:84% this veto so I ask that you vote yes. 01:00:35.195 --> 01:00:39.420 align:middle line:84% The clerk will call the roll [INAUDIBLE] care. 01:00:39.420 --> 01:00:40.400 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE]? 01:00:40.400 --> 01:00:41.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:41.110 --> 01:00:42.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:42.010 --> 01:00:42.510 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:00:42.510 --> 01:00:43.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:43.130 --> 01:00:43.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:43.630 --> 01:00:44.730 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:00:44.730 --> 01:00:45.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:45.480 --> 01:00:46.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:46.210 --> 01:00:46.840 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:00:46.840 --> 01:00:47.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:47.510 --> 01:00:48.066 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:48.066 --> 01:00:49.181 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:00:49.181 --> 01:00:49.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:49.680 --> 01:00:50.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:50.610 --> 01:00:51.431 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:00:51.431 --> 01:00:51.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:51.930 --> 01:00:52.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:52.470 --> 01:00:54.244 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:00:54.244 --> 01:00:55.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:55.010 --> 01:00:55.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:55.970 --> 01:00:57.140 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:00:57.140 --> 01:00:58.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:00:58.020 --> 01:00:59.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 01:00:59.280 --> 01:01:00.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:00.060 --> 01:01:00.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:00.730 --> 01:01:01.650 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:01:01.650 --> 01:01:02.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:02.170 --> 01:01:02.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:02.670 --> 01:01:03.570 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:01:03.570 --> 01:01:04.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:04.250 --> 01:01:04.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:04.950 --> 01:01:05.700 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:01:05.700 --> 01:01:06.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:06.280 --> 01:01:06.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:06.780 --> 01:01:07.440 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:01:07.440 --> 01:01:08.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:08.110 --> 01:01:08.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:08.810 --> 01:01:09.956 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:01:09.956 --> 01:01:10.928 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:10.928 --> 01:01:13.844 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:01:13.844 --> 01:01:15.302 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:01:15.302 --> 01:01:16.760 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:01:16.760 --> 01:01:17.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:17.740 --> 01:01:19.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:19.250 --> 01:01:19.910 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:01:19.910 --> 01:01:20.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:20.410 --> 01:01:20.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:20.980 --> 01:01:21.820 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:01:21.820 --> 01:01:22.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:22.720 --> 01:01:23.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:23.340 --> 01:01:23.960 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:01:23.960 --> 01:01:24.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:24.700 --> 01:01:25.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:25.320 --> 01:01:25.980 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:01:25.980 --> 01:01:26.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:26.950 --> 01:01:27.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:27.610 --> 01:01:28.730 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:01:28.730 --> 01:01:29.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:29.230 --> 01:01:29.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:29.800 --> 01:01:30.400 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:01:30.400 --> 01:01:31.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:31.150 --> 01:01:32.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:32.080 --> 01:01:32.740 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:01:32.740 --> 01:01:33.485 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:33.485 --> 01:01:33.985 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:33.985 --> 01:01:35.210 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:01:35.210 --> 01:01:35.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:35.710 --> 01:01:36.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:36.440 --> 01:01:37.090 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:01:37.090 --> 01:01:37.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:37.920 --> 01:01:38.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:38.650 --> 01:01:39.160 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:01:39.160 --> 01:01:40.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:40.050 --> 01:01:40.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:40.910 --> 01:01:41.650 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:01:41.650 --> 01:01:42.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:42.610 --> 01:01:43.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:43.150 --> 01:01:43.740 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:01:43.740 --> 01:01:44.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:44.620 --> 01:01:45.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:45.250 --> 01:01:46.794 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:01:46.794 --> 01:01:47.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:47.680 --> 01:01:48.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:48.190 --> 01:01:49.210 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:01:49.210 --> 01:01:49.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:49.920 --> 01:01:50.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:50.590 --> 01:01:51.793 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:01:51.793 --> 01:01:52.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:52.640 --> 01:01:53.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:53.360 --> 01:01:53.860 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:01:53.860 --> 01:01:54.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:54.850 --> 01:01:55.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:55.600 --> 01:01:56.290 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:01:56.290 --> 01:01:57.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:57.250 --> 01:01:57.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:57.940 --> 01:01:58.530 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:01:58.530 --> 01:01:59.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:01:59.280 --> 01:02:00.066 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:00.066 --> 01:02:02.482 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:02:02.482 --> 01:02:02.982 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:02:02.982 --> 01:02:03.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:03.960 --> 01:02:04.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:04.850 --> 01:02:06.706 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:02:06.706 --> 01:02:07.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:07.650 --> 01:02:08.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:08.250 --> 01:02:08.970 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:02:08.970 --> 01:02:10.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:10.080 --> 01:02:10.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:10.650 --> 01:02:11.310 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:02:11.310 --> 01:02:12.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:12.220 --> 01:02:13.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:13.530 --> 01:02:15.346 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:02:15.346 --> 01:02:16.338 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:16.338 --> 01:02:18.818 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:02:18.818 --> 01:02:21.300 align:middle line:84% 37 in the affirmative, none in the negative. 01:02:21.300 --> 01:02:24.220 align:middle line:84% 37 members having voted in the affirmative, 01:02:24.220 --> 01:02:25.840 align:middle line:90% none in the negative. 01:02:25.840 --> 01:02:28.950 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:02:28.950 --> 01:02:30.920 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:02:30.920 --> 01:02:33.900 align:middle line:90% Report of the committee. 01:02:33.900 --> 01:02:36.450 align:middle line:84% The Committee of Ways and Means to defer the House bill 01:02:36.450 --> 01:02:38.430 align:middle line:84% establishing a sick leave bank for Maria 01:02:38.430 --> 01:02:40.900 align:middle line:84% Williams, an employee of the Department of Mental Health. 01:02:40.900 --> 01:02:43.700 align:middle line:84% House number 3922, report recommend [INAUDIBLE] 01:02:43.700 --> 01:02:46.837 align:middle line:84% to past, Karen E. Spilka for the committee. 01:02:46.837 --> 01:02:48.420 align:middle line:84% The senator from Bristol and Plymouth, 01:02:48.420 --> 01:02:50.400 align:middle line:84% Mr. Montigny asks for unanimous consent 01:02:50.400 --> 01:02:52.680 align:middle line:84% to suspend the rules to allow the matter 01:02:52.680 --> 01:02:54.720 align:middle line:90% to be considered forthwith. 01:02:54.720 --> 01:02:56.010 align:middle line:90% Is there any objections? 01:02:56.010 --> 01:02:58.170 align:middle line:90% The chair has none. 01:02:58.170 --> 01:03:00.180 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on ordering the bill 01:03:00.180 --> 01:03:01.230 align:middle line:90% to a third reading. 01:03:01.230 --> 01:03:02.890 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:03:02.890 --> 01:03:03.610 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:03:03.610 --> 01:03:04.360 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:03:04.360 --> 01:03:06.196 align:middle line:84% The bill is ordered to a third reading. 01:03:06.196 --> 01:03:07.594 align:middle line:90% Third reading of the bill. 01:03:07.594 --> 01:03:11.970 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] for Maria Williams, and employee of the Department 01:03:11.970 --> 01:03:15.090 align:middle line:84% of Mental Health house number 3922. 01:03:15.090 --> 01:03:16.590 align:middle line:84% The bill has been read a third time. 01:03:16.590 --> 01:03:18.340 align:middle line:84% The question now comes of passing the bill 01:03:18.340 --> 01:03:19.440 align:middle line:90% to be engrossed. 01:03:19.440 --> 01:03:21.220 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:03:21.220 --> 01:03:22.402 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:03:22.402 --> 01:03:23.110 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:03:23.110 --> 01:03:25.530 align:middle line:84% The bill is passed to be engrossed. 01:03:25.530 --> 01:03:26.760 align:middle line:90% Report of the committee. 01:03:26.760 --> 01:03:28.200 align:middle line:84% The committee on ways and means [INAUDIBLE] 01:03:28.200 --> 01:03:29.700 align:middle line:84% referred the House bill establishing 01:03:29.700 --> 01:03:31.290 align:middle line:84% a sick leave bank or Amanda Rodriguez, 01:03:31.290 --> 01:03:32.880 align:middle line:90% an employee the trial court. 01:03:32.880 --> 01:03:35.430 align:middle line:84% House number 3932 reports recommend the [INAUDIBLE] 01:03:35.430 --> 01:03:38.310 align:middle line:84% to pass, Karen E. Spilka for the committee. 01:03:38.310 --> 01:03:40.740 align:middle line:84% The senator from Suffolk and Middlesex, Mr. Brownsberger, 01:03:40.740 --> 01:03:42.420 align:middle line:84% asks unanimous consent to suspend 01:03:42.420 --> 01:03:45.900 align:middle line:84% the rules to allow the matter to be considered forthwith. 01:03:45.900 --> 01:03:47.440 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:03:47.440 --> 01:03:50.199 align:middle line:84% The chair has none and the rules are suspended. 01:03:50.199 --> 01:03:51.990 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on ordering the bill 01:03:51.990 --> 01:03:53.460 align:middle line:90% through the third reading. 01:03:53.460 --> 01:03:55.300 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:03:55.300 --> 01:03:55.970 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:03:55.970 --> 01:03:58.470 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is ordered to a third reading. 01:03:58.470 --> 01:03:59.510 align:middle line:90% Third reading of the bill. 01:03:59.510 --> 01:04:01.140 align:middle line:84% An act establishing the sick leave bank 01:04:01.140 --> 01:04:03.340 align:middle line:84% for Amanda Rodriguez, an employee of the trial court 01:04:03.340 --> 01:04:05.370 align:middle line:90% house number 3932. 01:04:05.370 --> 01:04:07.020 align:middle line:84% The bill has been read a third time. 01:04:07.020 --> 01:04:09.750 align:middle line:84% The question comes on passing the bill to be engrossed. 01:04:09.750 --> 01:04:11.560 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:04:11.560 --> 01:04:12.700 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:04:12.700 --> 01:04:16.240 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is passed to be engrossed. 01:04:16.240 --> 01:04:17.280 align:middle line:90% Report of the committee. 01:04:17.280 --> 01:04:18.670 align:middle line:84% The committee on rules to [INAUDIBLE] 01:04:18.670 --> 01:04:20.461 align:middle line:84% the House bill designating a certain bridge 01:04:20.461 --> 01:04:24.040 align:middle line:84% as the Trooper Thomas L. Clardy Memorial Bridge, house number 01:04:24.040 --> 01:04:24.750 align:middle line:90% 3900. 01:04:24.750 --> 01:04:26.455 align:middle line:84% Reports recommend that the matter 01:04:26.455 --> 01:04:28.710 align:middle line:84% be placed in the [INAUDIBLE] for next session, Mark C. 01:04:28.710 --> 01:04:31.680 align:middle line:90% Montigny for the committee. 01:04:31.680 --> 01:04:33.850 align:middle line:84% The senator from Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire 01:04:33.850 --> 01:04:36.630 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Miss Gobi, asks unanimous consent 01:04:36.630 --> 01:04:39.060 align:middle line:84% that the rules be suspended to allow the matter 01:04:39.060 --> 01:04:40.710 align:middle line:90% to be considered forthwith. 01:04:40.710 --> 01:04:43.590 align:middle line:90% Is there objection to the bill? 01:04:43.590 --> 01:04:45.160 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:04:45.160 --> 01:04:46.442 align:middle line:90% The chair has none. 01:04:46.442 --> 01:04:48.150 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on ordering a bill 01:04:48.150 --> 01:04:49.230 align:middle line:90% to a third reading. 01:04:49.230 --> 01:04:51.220 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:04:51.220 --> 01:04:51.920 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:04:51.920 --> 01:04:54.420 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is ordered to a third reading. 01:04:54.420 --> 01:04:55.560 align:middle line:90% Third reading of the bill. 01:04:55.560 --> 01:04:57.840 align:middle line:84% An act designating a certain bridge 01:04:57.840 --> 01:05:01.470 align:middle line:84% in the town of Southbridge as the Trooper Thomas L. Clardy 01:05:01.470 --> 01:05:02.977 align:middle line:84% Memorial Bridge, House number 3900, 01:05:02.977 --> 01:05:05.310 align:middle line:84% it's title having been changed by the committee on bills 01:05:05.310 --> 01:05:07.170 align:middle line:90% in the third reading. 01:05:07.170 --> 01:05:08.850 align:middle line:84% The bill has been read a third time. 01:05:08.850 --> 01:05:10.680 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on passing the bill 01:05:10.680 --> 01:05:12.150 align:middle line:90% to be engrossed. 01:05:12.150 --> 01:05:14.050 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:05:14.050 --> 01:05:15.250 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:05:15.250 --> 01:05:19.290 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is passed to be engrossed. 01:05:19.290 --> 01:05:21.654 align:middle line:90% Report of the committee. 01:05:21.654 --> 01:05:23.820 align:middle line:84% The committee on rules to [INAUDIBLE] the House bill 01:05:23.820 --> 01:05:26.780 align:middle line:84% designating a certain road as Trooper Thomas L. Clardy 01:05:26.780 --> 01:05:29.160 align:middle line:84% Way, house number 3901 reports [INAUDIBLE] 01:05:29.160 --> 01:05:31.590 align:middle line:84% be placed [INAUDIBLE] for next session, Mark C. 01:05:31.590 --> 01:05:34.380 align:middle line:90% Montigny for the committee. 01:05:34.380 --> 01:05:36.620 align:middle line:84% The Senator for Wocester, Hampden, Hampshire, 01:05:36.620 --> 01:05:39.090 align:middle line:84% and Middlesex, Ms. Gobi, asks unanimous consent 01:05:39.090 --> 01:05:41.520 align:middle line:84% that the rules be suspended to allow the matter 01:05:41.520 --> 01:05:43.560 align:middle line:90% to be considered forthwith. 01:05:43.560 --> 01:05:45.220 align:middle line:90% Is there an objection? 01:05:45.220 --> 01:05:46.509 align:middle line:90% The chair has none. 01:05:46.509 --> 01:05:48.300 align:middle line:84% The question now comes on ordering the bill 01:05:48.300 --> 01:05:49.200 align:middle line:90% to a third reading. 01:05:49.200 --> 01:05:51.100 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:05:51.100 --> 01:05:52.460 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:05:52.460 --> 01:05:54.960 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is ordered to a third reading. 01:05:54.960 --> 01:05:56.160 align:middle line:90% Third reading of the bill. 01:05:56.160 --> 01:05:58.730 align:middle line:84% And act designating a certain road in the town of Charlton 01:05:58.730 --> 01:06:01.220 align:middle line:84% as the Trooper Thomas L. Clardy Way, House number 01:06:01.220 --> 01:06:03.000 align:middle line:84% 3901, its title having been changed 01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:05.340 align:middle line:84% by the committee on bills in the third reading. 01:06:05.340 --> 01:06:07.710 align:middle line:84% The bill has been read a third time. 01:06:07.710 --> 01:06:09.510 align:middle line:84% The question now comes of passing the bill 01:06:09.510 --> 01:06:10.770 align:middle line:90% to be engrossed. 01:06:10.770 --> 01:06:12.580 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 01:06:12.580 --> 01:06:13.750 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 01:06:13.750 --> 01:06:18.410 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the bill is passed to be engrossed. 01:06:18.410 --> 01:06:20.104 align:middle line:84% Senate will be in a brief recess. 01:06:20.104 --> 01:06:32.310 align:middle line:90% 01:06:32.310 --> 01:06:33.940 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:06:33.940 --> 01:06:37.210 align:middle line:84% Item 4590-1507 contained in section two 01:06:37.210 --> 01:06:39.572 align:middle line:84% relative to youth at risk matching grants 01:06:39.572 --> 01:06:41.280 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 01:06:41.280 --> 01:06:47.450 align:middle line:84% that the House has passed it notwithstanding the reduction 01:06:47.450 --> 01:06:49.540 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor 01:06:49.540 --> 01:06:52.010 align:middle line:90% by a vote of 123 to 31. 01:06:52.010 --> 01:06:53.710 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 01:06:53.710 --> 01:06:56.620 align:middle line:84% shall this item pass notwithstanding the objections 01:06:56.620 --> 01:06:58.804 align:middle line:90% of the governor to the contrary? 01:06:58.804 --> 01:07:00.220 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:07:00.220 --> 01:07:02.530 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator deMacedo. 01:07:02.530 --> 01:07:04.240 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mister President, and it's 01:07:04.240 --> 01:07:06.340 align:middle line:84% a pleasure to see you up there on the rostrum. 01:07:06.340 --> 01:07:08.890 align:middle line:84% You're doing a fine job as usual. 01:07:08.890 --> 01:07:10.960 align:middle line:84% I'm hopeful that we might be able to get 01:07:10.960 --> 01:07:17.620 align:middle line:84% an explanation in regard to item 4590-1507, youth 01:07:17.620 --> 01:07:19.240 align:middle line:90% at risk matching grant program. 01:07:19.240 --> 01:07:21.760 align:middle line:84% And I'm hoping that the gentlelady from Salem 01:07:21.760 --> 01:07:24.920 align:middle line:84% might be able to elaborate a little further on why 01:07:24.920 --> 01:07:28.950 align:middle line:84% we are going to override the reduction of $340,000. 01:07:28.950 --> 01:07:30.160 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:07:30.160 --> 01:07:31.990 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentlelady 01:07:31.990 --> 01:07:33.740 align:middle line:90% from Essex, Senator Lovely. 01:07:33.740 --> 01:07:34.870 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:07:34.870 --> 01:07:38.470 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate $340,000 in funding 01:07:38.470 --> 01:07:41.800 align:middle line:84% for various youth serving organizations, including 01:07:41.800 --> 01:07:45.340 align:middle line:84% Attleborough Area Social Responsibility, Big Brothers, 01:07:45.340 --> 01:07:49.840 align:middle line:84% Big Sisters, Mentor 2.0, Center for Teen Empowerment, 01:07:49.840 --> 01:07:53.050 align:middle line:84% and Youth Development Organization Inc. in Lawrence. 01:07:53.050 --> 01:07:56.680 align:middle line:84% These earmarks represent essential services and programs 01:07:56.680 --> 01:07:58.480 align:middle line:84% for children and young adults, including 01:07:58.480 --> 01:08:02.877 align:middle line:84% child care sites, youth programs, and sports programs. 01:08:02.877 --> 01:08:04.960 align:middle line:84% It is important that we invest in our young people 01:08:04.960 --> 01:08:08.740 align:middle line:84% and increase access to safe and supportive environments that 01:08:08.740 --> 01:08:10.810 align:middle line:84% promote healthy living, connect them 01:08:10.810 --> 01:08:14.680 align:middle line:84% to empowering relationships, and carve positive pathways 01:08:14.680 --> 01:08:16.220 align:middle line:90% to ensure their success. 01:08:16.220 --> 01:08:18.439 align:middle line:84% Therefore I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:08:18.439 --> 01:08:21.160 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:08:21.160 --> 01:08:23.448 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:08:23.448 --> 01:08:24.382 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:08:24.382 --> 01:08:25.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:25.790 --> 01:08:26.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:26.510 --> 01:08:27.109 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:08:27.109 --> 01:08:28.094 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:28.094 --> 01:08:28.594 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:28.594 --> 01:08:31.559 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:08:31.559 --> 01:08:32.059 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:08:32.059 --> 01:08:35.029 align:middle line:90% 01:08:35.029 --> 01:08:36.120 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:08:36.120 --> 01:08:36.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:36.620 --> 01:08:37.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:37.250 --> 01:08:37.910 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:08:37.910 --> 01:08:38.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:38.640 --> 01:08:39.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:39.260 --> 01:08:40.220 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:08:40.220 --> 01:08:41.127 align:middle line:90% No. 01:08:41.127 --> 01:08:41.627 align:middle line:90% No. 01:08:41.627 --> 01:08:42.127 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:08:42.127 --> 01:08:45.189 align:middle line:90% 01:08:45.189 --> 01:08:45.689 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:08:45.689 --> 01:08:46.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:46.670 --> 01:08:48.286 align:middle line:90% Yes. deMacedo? 01:08:48.286 --> 01:08:48.960 align:middle line:90% No. 01:08:48.960 --> 01:08:49.779 align:middle line:90% No. 01:08:49.779 --> 01:08:50.880 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:51.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:51.620 --> 01:08:52.279 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:52.279 --> 01:08:53.510 align:middle line:90% Donaghue? 01:08:53.510 --> 01:08:54.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:54.490 --> 01:08:55.785 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:08:55.785 --> 01:08:56.285 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:08:56.285 --> 01:08:59.750 align:middle line:90% 01:08:59.750 --> 01:09:00.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:00.740 --> 01:09:02.720 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:09:02.720 --> 01:09:03.720 align:middle line:90% No. 01:09:03.720 --> 01:09:04.899 align:middle line:90% No. 01:09:04.899 --> 01:09:05.529 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:09:05.529 --> 01:09:06.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:06.420 --> 01:09:07.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:07.380 --> 01:09:08.578 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:09:08.578 --> 01:09:09.078 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:09.078 --> 01:09:10.026 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:10.026 --> 01:09:10.974 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:09:10.974 --> 01:09:11.896 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:11.896 --> 01:09:12.396 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:12.396 --> 01:09:13.818 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:09:13.818 --> 01:09:14.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:14.730 --> 01:09:15.229 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:15.229 --> 01:09:16.270 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:09:16.270 --> 01:09:16.970 align:middle line:90% No. 01:09:16.970 --> 01:09:17.899 align:middle line:90% No. 01:09:17.899 --> 01:09:18.560 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:09:18.560 --> 01:09:19.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:19.760 --> 01:09:20.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:20.470 --> 01:09:21.100 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:09:21.100 --> 01:09:21.859 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:21.859 --> 01:09:22.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:22.550 --> 01:09:23.250 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:09:23.250 --> 01:09:24.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:24.170 --> 01:09:24.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:24.710 --> 01:09:25.430 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:09:25.430 --> 01:09:26.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:26.190 --> 01:09:26.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:26.690 --> 01:09:27.350 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:09:27.350 --> 01:09:28.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:28.580 --> 01:09:29.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:29.090 --> 01:09:30.136 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:09:30.136 --> 01:09:31.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:31.010 --> 01:09:31.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:31.630 --> 01:09:32.565 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:09:32.565 --> 01:09:33.399 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:33.399 --> 01:09:34.189 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:34.189 --> 01:09:34.729 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:09:34.729 --> 01:09:35.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:35.660 --> 01:09:36.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:36.350 --> 01:09:37.170 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:09:37.170 --> 01:09:37.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:37.670 --> 01:09:38.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:38.180 --> 01:09:39.296 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:09:39.296 --> 01:09:39.796 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:39.796 --> 01:09:40.752 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:40.752 --> 01:09:43.142 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:09:43.142 --> 01:09:44.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:44.100 --> 01:09:44.779 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:44.779 --> 01:09:45.630 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:09:45.630 --> 01:09:46.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:46.470 --> 01:09:47.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:47.010 --> 01:09:47.636 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:09:47.636 --> 01:09:48.135 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:48.135 --> 01:09:49.065 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:49.065 --> 01:09:49.995 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:09:49.995 --> 01:09:50.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:50.930 --> 01:09:51.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:51.680 --> 01:09:52.290 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:09:52.290 --> 01:09:53.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:53.290 --> 01:09:54.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:54.130 --> 01:09:54.987 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:09:54.987 --> 01:09:55.961 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:55.961 --> 01:09:56.935 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:09:56.935 --> 01:09:57.909 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:09:57.909 --> 01:09:59.844 align:middle line:90% No. 01:09:59.844 --> 01:10:00.344 align:middle line:90% No? 01:10:00.344 --> 01:10:00.831 align:middle line:90% Did he say no? 01:10:00.831 --> 01:10:01.331 align:middle line:90% No. 01:10:01.331 --> 01:10:03.710 align:middle line:90% No. 01:10:03.710 --> 01:10:04.230 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:10:04.230 --> 01:10:04.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:10:04.880 --> 01:10:05.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:10:05.980 --> 01:10:06.711 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:10:06.711 --> 01:10:07.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:10:07.210 --> 01:10:08.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:10:08.750 --> 01:10:11.629 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:10:11.629 --> 01:10:13.126 align:middle line:90% Senator Brady? 01:10:13.126 --> 01:10:16.619 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:10:16.619 --> 01:10:19.114 align:middle line:84% I would like to be recorded in the affirmative. 01:10:19.114 --> 01:10:21.609 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:10:21.609 --> 01:10:22.607 align:middle line:90% OK, OK. 01:10:22.607 --> 01:10:25.601 align:middle line:90% 01:10:25.601 --> 01:10:27.098 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 01:10:27.098 --> 01:12:28.355 align:middle line:90% 01:12:28.355 --> 01:12:32.347 align:middle line:90% Probably only get about halfway. 01:12:32.347 --> 01:12:36.722 align:middle line:84% So the gentlelady from Middlesex and Norfolk, senator Creem. 01:12:36.722 --> 01:12:41.204 align:middle line:84% Mister President, I decided to be recorded in the affirmative. 01:12:41.204 --> 01:12:42.698 align:middle line:90% Creem votes yes. 01:12:42.698 --> 01:12:49.180 align:middle line:90% 01:12:49.180 --> 01:12:51.280 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 32 members having 01:12:51.280 --> 01:12:53.230 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, five members 01:12:53.230 --> 01:12:54.670 align:middle line:90% haven't voted in the negative. 01:12:54.670 --> 01:12:57.520 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 01:12:57.520 --> 01:12:59.710 align:middle line:84% of the governor, two thirds of the members 01:12:59.710 --> 01:13:01.300 align:middle line:90% having voted in the affirmative. 01:13:01.300 --> 01:13:02.860 align:middle line:90% Paper from a House. 01:13:02.860 --> 01:13:06.160 align:middle line:84% Item 4800-0038 contained in section two, 01:13:06.160 --> 01:13:08.202 align:middle line:84% relative to services for children and families 01:13:08.202 --> 01:13:09.910 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 01:13:09.910 --> 01:13:12.201 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 01:13:12.201 --> 01:13:16.150 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 128 to 25. 01:13:16.150 --> 01:13:18.270 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:13:18.270 --> 01:13:20.890 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:13:20.890 --> 01:13:22.700 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:13:22.700 --> 01:13:24.910 align:middle line:84% The senator recognizes the gentleman 01:13:24.910 --> 01:13:26.674 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, Senator deMacedo. 01:13:26.674 --> 01:13:27.715 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:13:27.715 --> 01:13:30.860 align:middle line:84% Please forgive me, but I had a little trouble hearing the line 01:13:30.860 --> 01:13:31.360 align:middle line:90% item. 01:13:31.360 --> 01:13:33.120 align:middle line:84% Could we please repeat that so we 01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:36.397 align:middle line:84% are certain on which line item is before the body? 01:13:36.397 --> 01:13:49.960 align:middle line:90% Line item 4800-0038. 01:13:49.960 --> 01:13:51.215 align:middle line:90% I've got it, thank you. 01:13:51.215 --> 01:13:54.070 align:middle line:90% OK. 01:13:54.070 --> 01:13:54.640 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:13:54.640 --> 01:13:56.219 align:middle line:90% And might I be recognized now? 01:13:56.219 --> 01:13:57.010 align:middle line:90% You are recognized. 01:13:57.010 --> 01:13:58.390 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, I appreciate that. 01:13:58.390 --> 01:14:00.431 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman from Plymouth. 01:14:00.431 --> 01:14:02.530 align:middle line:84% OK, this is service for children and families. 01:14:02.530 --> 01:14:08.770 align:middle line:84% This is a reduction of $403,000 out of a conference committee 01:14:08.770 --> 01:14:12.130 align:middle line:90% report of $289 million. 01:14:12.130 --> 01:14:15.340 align:middle line:84% I'm hopeful that we might get an explanation from my good friend 01:14:15.340 --> 01:14:20.080 align:middle line:84% from on why we must be overriding this particular veto 01:14:20.080 --> 01:14:22.660 align:middle line:90% that the governor put forth. 01:14:22.660 --> 01:14:24.430 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:14:24.430 --> 01:14:26.980 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator diDomenico. 01:14:26.980 --> 01:14:28.515 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:14:28.515 --> 01:14:29.890 align:middle line:84% This video would decrease funding 01:14:29.890 --> 01:14:33.240 align:middle line:84% by $403,000 from the DCF services account. 01:14:33.240 --> 01:14:34.780 align:middle line:84% These seven community based services 01:14:34.780 --> 01:14:37.870 align:middle line:84% provide families and children with resources, guidance, 01:14:37.870 --> 01:14:41.770 align:middle line:84% and support to ensure a happy, healthy, and stable homes. 01:14:41.770 --> 01:14:44.470 align:middle line:84% Among the programs vetoed is Rick's Place, 01:14:44.470 --> 01:14:46.660 align:middle line:84% which provides grief support to help children cope 01:14:46.660 --> 01:14:48.659 align:middle line:90% with the loss of loved ones. 01:14:48.659 --> 01:14:50.200 align:middle line:84% This veto would also decrease funding 01:14:50.200 --> 01:14:52.912 align:middle line:84% for the Children's Advocacy Center of Pursell county, 01:14:52.912 --> 01:14:54.370 align:middle line:84% which provides a place for children 01:14:54.370 --> 01:14:57.010 align:middle line:84% to [INAUDIBLE] physical abuse to provide 01:14:57.010 --> 01:14:59.410 align:middle line:84% the details of their victimization only one time 01:14:59.410 --> 01:15:01.035 align:middle line:90% during the investigation. 01:15:01.035 --> 01:15:02.410 align:middle line:84% We must continue to be a champion 01:15:02.410 --> 01:15:05.270 align:middle line:84% for the most vulnerable children in our commonwealth. 01:15:05.270 --> 01:15:10.060 align:middle line:84% That is why I asked for you to overturn this veto. 01:15:10.060 --> 01:15:13.608 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:15:13.608 --> 01:15:14.108 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:15:14.108 --> 01:15:17.980 align:middle line:90% 01:15:17.980 --> 01:15:19.010 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:15:19.010 --> 01:15:19.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:19.510 --> 01:15:20.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:20.010 --> 01:15:21.270 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:15:21.270 --> 01:15:21.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:21.770 --> 01:15:22.704 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:22.704 --> 01:15:23.632 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:15:23.632 --> 01:15:24.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:24.560 --> 01:15:25.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:25.850 --> 01:15:26.410 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:15:26.410 --> 01:15:26.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:26.940 --> 01:15:28.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:28.410 --> 01:15:29.250 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:15:29.250 --> 01:15:30.060 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:30.060 --> 01:15:30.930 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:30.930 --> 01:15:31.830 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:15:31.830 --> 01:15:32.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:32.730 --> 01:15:34.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:34.020 --> 01:15:34.530 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:15:34.530 --> 01:15:35.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:35.100 --> 01:15:36.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:36.280 --> 01:15:36.880 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:37.650 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:37.650 --> 01:15:38.616 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:38.616 --> 01:15:39.485 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:15:39.485 --> 01:15:39.984 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:39.984 --> 01:15:40.896 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:40.896 --> 01:15:41.808 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:15:41.808 --> 01:15:42.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:42.720 --> 01:15:44.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:44.130 --> 01:15:44.650 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:15:44.650 --> 01:15:45.632 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:45.632 --> 01:15:47.105 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:47.105 --> 01:15:48.578 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:15:48.578 --> 01:15:49.551 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:49.551 --> 01:15:50.051 align:middle line:90% No. 01:15:50.051 --> 01:15:53.490 align:middle line:90% 01:15:53.490 --> 01:15:54.430 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:15:54.430 --> 01:15:54.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:54.930 --> 01:15:56.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:56.500 --> 01:15:57.210 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:15:57.210 --> 01:15:57.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:57.710 --> 01:15:58.688 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:15:58.688 --> 01:15:59.504 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:15:59.504 --> 01:16:00.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:00.320 --> 01:16:01.278 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:01.278 --> 01:16:02.174 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:16:02.174 --> 01:16:03.966 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:03.966 --> 01:16:07.060 align:middle line:90% Humason's Yes. 01:16:07.060 --> 01:16:08.160 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:16:08.160 --> 01:16:09.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:09.140 --> 01:16:10.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:10.120 --> 01:16:13.560 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:16:13.560 --> 01:16:15.964 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:16:15.964 --> 01:16:16.910 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:16:16.910 --> 01:16:17.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:17.410 --> 01:16:18.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:18.860 --> 01:16:19.440 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:16:19.440 --> 01:16:19.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:19.940 --> 01:16:21.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:21.200 --> 01:16:21.841 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:16:21.841 --> 01:16:22.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:22.340 --> 01:16:23.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:23.520 --> 01:16:24.070 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:16:24.070 --> 01:16:24.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:24.830 --> 01:16:25.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:25.940 --> 01:16:26.700 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:16:26.700 --> 01:16:27.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:27.410 --> 01:16:28.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:28.490 --> 01:16:29.000 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:29.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:29.960 --> 01:16:30.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:30.940 --> 01:16:31.510 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:16:31.510 --> 01:16:32.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:32.380 --> 01:16:33.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:33.730 --> 01:16:34.240 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:16:34.240 --> 01:16:35.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:35.500 --> 01:16:36.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:36.500 --> 01:16:37.300 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:16:37.300 --> 01:16:37.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:37.970 --> 01:16:39.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:39.350 --> 01:16:40.190 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:16:40.190 --> 01:16:40.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:40.730 --> 01:16:41.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:41.840 --> 01:16:42.590 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:16:42.590 --> 01:16:43.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:43.520 --> 01:16:44.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:44.780 --> 01:16:45.816 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:16:45.816 --> 01:16:46.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:46.550 --> 01:16:47.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:47.600 --> 01:16:48.260 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:16:48.260 --> 01:16:48.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:48.770 --> 01:16:50.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:50.120 --> 01:16:50.630 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:16:50.630 --> 01:16:51.626 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:51.626 --> 01:16:53.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:53.120 --> 01:16:54.116 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:16:54.116 --> 01:16:55.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:55.460 --> 01:16:55.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:55.960 --> 01:16:57.380 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:16:57.380 --> 01:16:57.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:57.880 --> 01:16:58.867 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:16:58.867 --> 01:16:59.800 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:16:59.800 --> 01:17:00.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:00.300 --> 01:17:01.684 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:01.684 --> 01:17:03.552 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:17:03.552 --> 01:17:04.486 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:17:04.486 --> 01:17:05.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:05.420 --> 01:17:06.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:06.660 --> 01:17:07.160 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:17:07.160 --> 01:17:07.660 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:17:07.660 --> 01:17:10.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:10.100 --> 01:17:12.540 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:17:12.540 --> 01:17:13.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:17:13.040 --> 01:17:24.800 align:middle line:90% 01:17:24.800 --> 01:17:26.810 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 33 members having 01:17:26.810 --> 01:17:28.580 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, three members 01:17:28.580 --> 01:17:29.880 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:17:29.880 --> 01:17:33.380 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:17:33.380 --> 01:17:34.280 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:35.960 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:17:35.960 --> 01:17:39.020 align:middle line:84% Item 4800-0200 contained in section two 01:17:39.020 --> 01:17:41.630 align:middle line:84% relative to DCF Family Resource Centers 01:17:41.630 --> 01:17:43.500 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 01:17:43.500 --> 01:17:45.980 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 01:17:45.980 --> 01:17:47.855 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor 01:17:47.855 --> 01:17:50.714 align:middle line:90% by a vote of 130 to 23. 01:17:50.714 --> 01:17:52.130 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, 01:17:52.130 --> 01:17:54.980 align:middle line:84% shall this item pass notwithstanding the objections 01:17:54.980 --> 01:17:57.710 align:middle line:84% from his excellency the governor to the contrary? 01:17:57.710 --> 01:17:59.870 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:17:59.870 --> 01:18:03.290 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator-- 01:18:03.290 --> 01:18:05.510 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Mr. President, and through 01:18:05.510 --> 01:18:07.080 align:middle line:90% you to my colleagues. 01:18:07.080 --> 01:18:12.870 align:middle line:84% We're talking about line item 4800-0200 01:18:12.870 --> 01:18:15.320 align:middle line:84% It's a DCF Family Resource Center. 01:18:15.320 --> 01:18:17.750 align:middle line:84% This seems to be an earmark that is 01:18:17.750 --> 01:18:21.200 align:middle line:90% being stricken by the governor. 01:18:21.200 --> 01:18:24.980 align:middle line:84% I'm hopeful we might get a short explanation of this earmark 01:18:24.980 --> 01:18:26.000 align:middle line:90% from my good friend. 01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:27.890 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 01:18:27.890 --> 01:18:30.440 align:middle line:84% Recognizes the gentleman from Middlesex and Suffolk, 01:18:30.440 --> 01:18:32.240 align:middle line:90% senator diDomenico. 01:18:32.240 --> 01:18:33.740 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:18:33.740 --> 01:18:36.950 align:middle line:84% This video eliminates a $50,000 initiative in the DCF Family 01:18:36.950 --> 01:18:38.479 align:middle line:90% Resource center's account. 01:18:38.479 --> 01:18:40.520 align:middle line:84% And this funding would support the juvenile court 01:18:40.520 --> 01:18:42.620 align:middle line:84% mental health advocacy project administered 01:18:42.620 --> 01:18:44.360 align:middle line:90% by health advocates. 01:18:44.360 --> 01:18:45.980 align:middle line:84% And this [INAUDIBLE] increases access 01:18:45.980 --> 01:18:48.350 align:middle line:84% to mental health treatment for at risk children 01:18:48.350 --> 01:18:52.880 align:middle line:84% and adolescents involved in or diverted from juvenile courts. 01:18:52.880 --> 01:18:56.330 align:middle line:84% I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:18:56.330 --> 01:18:58.705 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:18:58.705 --> 01:19:01.555 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:19:01.555 --> 01:19:02.505 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:19:02.505 --> 01:19:03.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:03.470 --> 01:19:05.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:05.940 --> 01:19:08.315 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:19:08.315 --> 01:19:09.240 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:19:09.240 --> 01:19:09.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:09.740 --> 01:19:11.165 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:11.165 --> 01:19:11.750 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:19:11.750 --> 01:19:12.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:12.250 --> 01:19:13.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:13.680 --> 01:19:14.220 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:19:14.220 --> 01:19:14.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:14.870 --> 01:19:16.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:16.060 --> 01:19:16.930 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:19:16.930 --> 01:19:17.600 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:17.600 --> 01:19:18.620 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:18.620 --> 01:19:19.536 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:19:19.536 --> 01:19:20.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:20.290 --> 01:19:21.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:21.460 --> 01:19:21.960 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:19:21.960 --> 01:19:22.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:22.570 --> 01:19:23.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:23.780 --> 01:19:24.490 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:19:24.490 --> 01:19:25.400 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:25.400 --> 01:19:26.690 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:26.690 --> 01:19:27.830 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:19:27.830 --> 01:19:28.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:28.700 --> 01:19:29.665 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:29.665 --> 01:19:30.650 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:19:30.650 --> 01:19:31.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:31.150 --> 01:19:32.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:32.160 --> 01:19:32.780 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:19:32.780 --> 01:19:34.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:34.160 --> 01:19:35.080 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:19:35.080 --> 01:19:36.000 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:36.950 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:36.950 --> 01:19:37.490 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:19:37.490 --> 01:19:38.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:38.640 --> 01:19:40.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:40.070 --> 01:19:40.843 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:19:40.843 --> 01:19:41.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:41.650 --> 01:19:42.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:42.760 --> 01:19:43.270 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:19:43.270 --> 01:19:43.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:43.770 --> 01:19:44.719 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:44.719 --> 01:19:46.151 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:19:46.151 --> 01:19:46.651 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:46.651 --> 01:19:47.617 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:47.617 --> 01:19:48.583 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:19:48.583 --> 01:19:49.550 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:49.550 --> 01:19:50.850 align:middle line:90% No. 01:19:50.850 --> 01:19:51.350 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:19:51.350 --> 01:19:52.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:52.070 --> 01:19:54.111 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:54.111 --> 01:19:54.610 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:19:54.610 --> 01:19:55.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:55.310 --> 01:19:56.581 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:56.581 --> 01:19:57.080 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:19:57.080 --> 01:19:58.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:19:58.190 --> 01:20:00.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:00.420 --> 01:20:00.980 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:20:00.980 --> 01:20:01.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:01.710 --> 01:20:02.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:02.620 --> 01:20:03.360 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:20:03.360 --> 01:20:04.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:04.230 --> 01:20:05.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:05.300 --> 01:20:05.870 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:20:05.870 --> 01:20:06.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:06.710 --> 01:20:07.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:07.560 --> 01:20:08.270 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:20:08.270 --> 01:20:09.340 align:middle line:90% Yes 01:20:09.340 --> 01:20:10.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:10.340 --> 01:20:11.120 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:20:11.120 --> 01:20:11.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:11.620 --> 01:20:13.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:13.120 --> 01:20:14.150 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:20:14.150 --> 01:20:14.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:14.940 --> 01:20:15.835 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:15.835 --> 01:20:16.335 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:20:16.335 --> 01:20:17.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:17.520 --> 01:20:18.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:18.510 --> 01:20:19.480 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:20:19.480 --> 01:20:20.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:20.410 --> 01:20:21.366 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:21.366 --> 01:20:22.178 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:20:22.178 --> 01:20:22.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:22.990 --> 01:20:24.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:24.170 --> 01:20:24.976 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:20:24.976 --> 01:20:25.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:25.650 --> 01:20:26.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:26.830 --> 01:20:27.350 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:20:27.350 --> 01:20:28.350 align:middle line:90% No. 01:20:28.350 --> 01:20:29.760 align:middle line:90% No. 01:20:29.760 --> 01:20:30.470 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:20:30.470 --> 01:20:30.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:30.970 --> 01:20:31.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:31.890 --> 01:20:32.663 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:20:32.663 --> 01:20:33.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:33.490 --> 01:20:34.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:34.990 --> 01:20:35.760 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:20:35.760 --> 01:20:36.260 align:middle line:90% No. 01:20:36.260 --> 01:20:37.400 align:middle line:90% No. 01:20:37.400 --> 01:20:38.343 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:20:38.343 --> 01:20:39.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:39.150 --> 01:20:40.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:40.350 --> 01:20:41.200 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:20:41.200 --> 01:20:42.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:42.887 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:20:42.887 --> 01:20:44.220 align:middle line:90% These go on the end [INAUDIBLE]. 01:20:44.220 --> 01:20:46.110 align:middle line:90% Have all been recorded? 01:20:46.110 --> 01:20:48.360 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:20:48.360 --> 01:20:49.968 align:middle line:90% from Middlesex, senator Barrett. 01:20:49.968 --> 01:20:51.718 align:middle line:84% Mister President, I would like to be 01:20:51.718 --> 01:20:52.884 align:middle line:90% recorded in the affirmative. 01:20:52.884 --> 01:20:54.828 align:middle line:90% Barrett votes [INAUDIBLE]. 01:20:54.828 --> 01:21:04.580 align:middle line:90% 01:21:04.580 --> 01:21:06.530 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 members having 01:21:06.530 --> 01:21:08.600 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, six members 01:21:08.600 --> 01:21:10.230 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:21:10.230 --> 01:21:13.280 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:21:13.280 --> 01:21:14.450 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:21:14.450 --> 01:21:16.670 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:21:16.670 --> 01:21:21.020 align:middle line:84% Item 5042-5000 contained in section two 01:21:21.020 --> 01:21:23.690 align:middle line:84% for the child and adolescent services, mental health 01:21:23.690 --> 01:21:24.744 align:middle line:90% services. 01:21:24.744 --> 01:21:26.660 align:middle line:84% This comes from the House with the endorsement 01:21:26.660 --> 01:21:28.880 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the reduction 01:21:28.880 --> 01:21:30.755 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor 01:21:30.755 --> 01:21:33.227 align:middle line:90% by a vote of 125 to 27. 01:21:33.227 --> 01:21:35.310 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:21:35.310 --> 01:21:37.844 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:21:37.844 --> 01:21:38.510 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:21:38.510 --> 01:21:40.784 align:middle line:90% 01:21:40.784 --> 01:21:42.200 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:21:42.200 --> 01:21:44.570 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator diMacedo. 01:21:44.570 --> 01:21:46.110 align:middle line:90% Thank you very much. 01:21:46.110 --> 01:21:48.170 align:middle line:84% I appreciate the opportunity, Mr. President, 01:21:48.170 --> 01:21:55.580 align:middle line:84% and I rise to ask, in regards to item 5042-5000, 01:21:55.580 --> 01:22:04.230 align:middle line:84% this was, last year we spent, FY 18, $88,650,000. 01:22:04.230 --> 01:22:07.790 align:middle line:84% The conference committee report was $91,700,000. 01:22:07.790 --> 01:22:16.040 align:middle line:84% It was reduced by a veto of the government back to $88,938,000. 01:22:16.040 --> 01:22:20.660 align:middle line:84% I'm asking why we are overriding the governor's veto. 01:22:20.660 --> 01:22:22.700 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:22:22.700 --> 01:22:24.260 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:22:24.260 --> 01:22:27.050 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, Senator DiDomenico. 01:22:27.050 --> 01:22:28.481 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:22:28.481 --> 01:22:30.230 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate four initiatives 01:22:30.230 --> 01:22:34.324 align:middle line:84% in the children's mental health account, totaling $2.8 million. 01:22:34.324 --> 01:22:36.740 align:middle line:84% These projects include funding for increased collaboration 01:22:36.740 --> 01:22:39.230 align:middle line:84% efforts to improve behavioral health services 01:22:39.230 --> 01:22:42.410 align:middle line:84% and support for young children, including developing strategies 01:22:42.410 --> 01:22:44.780 align:middle line:84% to identify children at risk for mental and behavioral 01:22:44.780 --> 01:22:45.740 align:middle line:90% challenges. 01:22:45.740 --> 01:22:48.920 align:middle line:84% Other proposed funding includes a loan forgiveness program 01:22:48.920 --> 01:22:50.990 align:middle line:84% to incentivize professionals to pursue careers 01:22:50.990 --> 01:22:53.060 align:middle line:84% in the mental health field and to practice 01:22:53.060 --> 01:22:55.730 align:middle line:84% in underserved areas in our state. 01:22:55.730 --> 01:22:59.714 align:middle line:84% For these reasons I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:22:59.714 --> 01:23:03.440 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:23:03.440 --> 01:23:03.940 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 01:23:03.940 --> 01:23:04.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:04.830 --> 01:23:06.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:06.360 --> 01:23:07.280 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:23:07.280 --> 01:23:07.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:07.820 --> 01:23:09.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:09.310 --> 01:23:09.900 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:23:09.900 --> 01:23:10.400 align:middle line:90% Yes 01:23:10.400 --> 01:23:11.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:11.310 --> 01:23:12.140 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:23:12.140 --> 01:23:12.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:12.640 --> 01:23:13.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:13.140 --> 01:23:15.520 align:middle line:90% 01:23:15.520 --> 01:23:16.310 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:23:16.310 --> 01:23:16.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:16.810 --> 01:23:17.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:17.900 --> 01:23:19.860 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:23:19.860 --> 01:23:20.840 align:middle line:90% No. 01:23:20.840 --> 01:23:22.160 align:middle line:90% No. 01:23:22.160 --> 01:23:22.660 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:23:22.660 --> 01:23:23.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:23.360 --> 01:23:24.365 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:24.365 --> 01:23:25.081 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:23:25.081 --> 01:23:25.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:25.580 --> 01:23:26.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:26.720 --> 01:23:27.882 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:23:27.882 --> 01:23:29.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:29.300 --> 01:23:31.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:31.190 --> 01:23:32.030 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:23:32.030 --> 01:23:32.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:32.750 --> 01:23:33.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:33.830 --> 01:23:34.770 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:23:34.770 --> 01:23:35.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:35.270 --> 01:23:36.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:36.290 --> 01:23:36.830 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:23:36.830 --> 01:23:37.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:37.750 --> 01:23:38.631 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:38.631 --> 01:23:39.130 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:23:39.130 --> 01:23:40.050 align:middle line:90% No. 01:23:40.050 --> 01:23:41.560 align:middle line:90% No. 01:23:41.560 --> 01:23:42.670 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:23:42.670 --> 01:23:43.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:43.170 --> 01:23:44.820 align:middle line:90% Yes Friedman? 01:23:44.820 --> 01:23:45.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:45.570 --> 01:23:46.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:46.840 --> 01:23:47.380 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:23:47.380 --> 01:23:48.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:48.340 --> 01:23:49.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:49.160 --> 01:23:49.920 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:23:49.920 --> 01:23:50.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:50.760 --> 01:23:51.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:51.880 --> 01:23:52.793 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:23:52.793 --> 01:23:53.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:53.520 --> 01:23:54.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:54.630 --> 01:23:55.590 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:23:55.590 --> 01:23:56.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:56.330 --> 01:23:57.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:57.570 --> 01:23:58.070 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:23:58.070 --> 01:23:58.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:58.620 --> 01:23:59.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:23:59.740 --> 01:24:00.620 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:24:00.620 --> 01:24:01.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:01.440 --> 01:24:02.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:02.520 --> 01:24:03.060 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:24:03.060 --> 01:24:04.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:04.110 --> 01:24:05.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:05.490 --> 01:24:06.500 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:24:06.500 --> 01:24:07.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:07.830 --> 01:24:09.126 align:middle line:90% Lovely. 01:24:09.126 --> 01:24:09.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:09.840 --> 01:24:11.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:11.250 --> 01:24:12.090 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:24:12.090 --> 01:24:12.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:12.710 --> 01:24:14.211 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:14.211 --> 01:24:14.710 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:24:14.710 --> 01:24:15.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:15.510 --> 01:24:16.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:16.620 --> 01:24:17.170 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:24:17.170 --> 01:24:18.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:18.120 --> 01:24:19.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:19.290 --> 01:24:19.970 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:24:19.970 --> 01:24:20.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:20.810 --> 01:24:22.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:22.020 --> 01:24:23.171 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:24:23.171 --> 01:24:23.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:23.670 --> 01:24:24.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:24.930 --> 01:24:26.100 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:24:26.100 --> 01:24:26.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:26.600 --> 01:24:27.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:27.980 --> 01:24:28.630 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:24:28.630 --> 01:24:29.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:29.350 --> 01:24:30.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:30.770 --> 01:24:31.330 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:24:31.330 --> 01:24:32.298 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:32.298 --> 01:24:33.266 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:33.266 --> 01:24:34.234 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:24:34.234 --> 01:24:35.202 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:35.202 --> 01:24:36.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:36.170 --> 01:24:37.138 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:24:37.138 --> 01:24:38.106 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:38.106 --> 01:24:39.014 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:39.014 --> 01:24:39.862 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:24:39.862 --> 01:24:40.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:40.710 --> 01:24:41.695 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:41.695 --> 01:24:42.625 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:24:42.625 --> 01:24:43.555 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:43.555 --> 01:24:44.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:44.850 --> 01:24:45.743 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:24:45.743 --> 01:24:46.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:46.450 --> 01:24:47.832 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:24:47.832 --> 01:24:49.305 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:24:49.305 --> 01:25:09.450 align:middle line:90% 01:25:09.450 --> 01:25:11.640 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 35 members having 01:25:11.640 --> 01:25:13.230 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, two members 01:25:13.230 --> 01:25:14.920 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:25:14.920 --> 01:25:18.060 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:25:18.060 --> 01:25:19.350 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:25:19.350 --> 01:25:20.850 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:25:20.850 --> 01:25:24.780 align:middle line:84% Item 5046-0000 contained in section two 01:25:24.780 --> 01:25:28.507 align:middle line:84% relative to adult mental health and support services 01:25:28.507 --> 01:25:30.215 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 01:25:30.215 --> 01:25:32.650 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the reduction 01:25:32.650 --> 01:25:37.395 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 135 to 20. 01:25:37.395 --> 01:25:39.810 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:25:39.810 --> 01:25:42.120 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:25:42.120 --> 01:25:43.890 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:25:43.890 --> 01:25:45.660 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:25:45.660 --> 01:25:47.160 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:25:47.160 --> 01:25:49.020 align:middle line:84% Why how delightful it is to see you 01:25:49.020 --> 01:25:50.850 align:middle line:90% upon the rostrum, Mr. President. 01:25:50.850 --> 01:25:53.970 align:middle line:84% And such an appropriate purple tie this afternoon. 01:25:53.970 --> 01:25:55.220 align:middle line:90% It's wonderful. 01:25:55.220 --> 01:25:57.840 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'm hoping that we can get an explanation 01:25:57.840 --> 01:26:01.770 align:middle line:84% from the gentleman who today sports a luminous purple tie 01:26:01.770 --> 01:26:04.110 align:middle line:84% from Everett, the second half of the dynamic duo 01:26:04.110 --> 01:26:06.000 align:middle line:84% from the committee on ways and means, 01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:08.370 align:middle line:84% relative to this particular item, which 01:26:08.370 --> 01:26:10.830 align:middle line:84% appears to be relative to adult community 01:26:10.830 --> 01:26:13.440 align:middle line:90% mental health services. 01:26:13.440 --> 01:26:15.030 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:26:15.030 --> 01:26:18.330 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:26:18.330 --> 01:26:19.920 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:26:19.920 --> 01:26:21.730 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce DMH adult support 01:26:21.730 --> 01:26:25.830 align:middle line:84% services account by $850,000 eliminating three earmarks. 01:26:25.830 --> 01:26:28.410 align:middle line:84% The DHM adult support services account funds community 01:26:28.410 --> 01:26:31.770 align:middle line:84% based services for adults, including day programs and case 01:26:31.770 --> 01:26:32.501 align:middle line:90% management. 01:26:32.501 --> 01:26:34.500 align:middle line:84% Clients are referred through emergency services, 01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:38.390 align:middle line:84% acute inpatient providers, court referrals, or doctors. 01:26:38.390 --> 01:26:40.650 align:middle line:84% This account also supports direct care staff that 01:26:40.650 --> 01:26:43.090 align:middle line:90% provide residential services. 01:26:43.090 --> 01:26:45.806 align:middle line:84% This veto seeks to eliminate an interagency agreement 01:26:45.806 --> 01:26:47.430 align:middle line:84% between the Department of Mental Health 01:26:47.430 --> 01:26:49.380 align:middle line:84% and Executive Office of Elder Affairs 01:26:49.380 --> 01:26:51.810 align:middle line:84% for increased resources for adult home and community 01:26:51.810 --> 01:26:55.340 align:middle line:84% based behavioral health services to adults over 60. 01:26:55.340 --> 01:26:58.830 align:middle line:84% Other initiatives that are cut by this cut 01:26:58.830 --> 01:27:02.700 align:middle line:84% include the William James Interface Referral Service 01:27:02.700 --> 01:27:04.910 align:middle line:84% and International Institute of New England which 01:27:04.910 --> 01:27:08.050 align:middle line:84% provide humanitarian relief, education, skills, 01:27:08.050 --> 01:27:09.080 align:middle line:90% and training. 01:27:09.080 --> 01:27:11.930 align:middle line:84% It's crucial we support these initiatives therefor I ask 01:27:11.930 --> 01:27:14.470 align:middle line:90% for you to overturn this veto. 01:27:14.470 --> 01:27:18.160 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:27:18.160 --> 01:27:18.946 align:middle line:90% Barrett. 01:27:18.946 --> 01:27:19.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:19.620 --> 01:27:21.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:21.700 --> 01:27:22.770 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:27:22.770 --> 01:27:23.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:23.560 --> 01:27:25.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:25.050 --> 01:27:25.760 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:27:25.760 --> 01:27:26.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:26.260 --> 01:27:27.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:27.290 --> 01:27:28.210 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:27:28.210 --> 01:27:28.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:28.770 --> 01:27:31.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:31.270 --> 01:27:31.840 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:27:31.840 --> 01:27:32.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:32.410 --> 01:27:33.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:33.670 --> 01:27:35.404 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:27:35.404 --> 01:27:36.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:36.190 --> 01:27:37.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:37.880 --> 01:27:38.760 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:27:38.760 --> 01:27:39.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:39.260 --> 01:27:40.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:40.630 --> 01:27:41.190 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:27:41.190 --> 01:27:42.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:42.010 --> 01:27:43.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:43.130 --> 01:27:43.900 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:27:43.900 --> 01:27:44.480 align:middle line:90% No. 01:27:44.480 --> 01:27:45.550 align:middle line:90% No. 01:27:45.550 --> 01:27:46.330 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:27:46.330 --> 01:27:47.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:47.740 --> 01:27:48.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:48.760 --> 01:27:49.480 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:27:49.480 --> 01:27:49.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:49.980 --> 01:27:51.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:51.190 --> 01:27:51.720 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:27:51.720 --> 01:27:53.115 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:53.115 --> 01:27:54.045 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:54.045 --> 01:27:54.975 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:27:54.975 --> 01:27:55.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:55.910 --> 01:27:57.316 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:27:57.316 --> 01:27:58.530 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:27:58.530 --> 01:27:59.030 align:middle line:90% Yes 01:27:59.030 --> 01:28:00.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:00.390 --> 01:28:00.900 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:28:00.900 --> 01:28:01.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:01.860 --> 01:28:03.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:03.080 --> 01:28:03.825 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:28:03.825 --> 01:28:04.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:04.590 --> 01:28:05.296 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:05.296 --> 01:28:06.520 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:28:06.520 --> 01:28:07.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:07.020 --> 01:28:09.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:09.140 --> 01:28:09.650 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:28:09.650 --> 01:28:10.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:10.150 --> 01:28:11.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:11.750 --> 01:28:12.270 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:28:12.270 --> 01:28:13.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:13.350 --> 01:28:14.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:14.550 --> 01:28:15.090 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:28:15.090 --> 01:28:15.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:15.810 --> 01:28:16.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:16.920 --> 01:28:17.430 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:28:17.430 --> 01:28:18.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:18.290 --> 01:28:19.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:19.460 --> 01:28:20.030 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:28:20.030 --> 01:28:20.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:20.840 --> 01:28:21.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:21.970 --> 01:28:22.540 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:28:22.540 --> 01:28:23.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:23.040 --> 01:28:24.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:24.570 --> 01:28:25.110 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:28:25.110 --> 01:28:25.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:25.890 --> 01:28:27.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:27.260 --> 01:28:27.880 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:28:27.880 --> 01:28:28.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:28.650 --> 01:28:29.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:29.910 --> 01:28:30.600 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:28:30.600 --> 01:28:31.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:31.590 --> 01:28:32.572 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:32.572 --> 01:28:33.401 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:28:33.401 --> 01:28:33.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:33.900 --> 01:28:35.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:35.190 --> 01:28:35.850 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:28:35.850 --> 01:28:36.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:36.660 --> 01:28:37.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:37.920 --> 01:28:38.950 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:28:38.950 --> 01:28:39.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:39.690 --> 01:28:40.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:40.870 --> 01:28:41.846 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:28:41.846 --> 01:28:42.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:42.600 --> 01:28:43.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:43.690 --> 01:28:44.380 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:28:44.380 --> 01:28:45.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:45.170 --> 01:28:46.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:46.260 --> 01:28:46.920 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:28:46.920 --> 01:28:48.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:48.060 --> 01:28:48.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:48.870 --> 01:28:50.288 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:28:50.288 --> 01:28:51.256 align:middle line:90% Yes 01:28:51.256 --> 01:28:52.224 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:52.224 --> 01:28:53.176 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:28:53.176 --> 01:28:53.676 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:53.676 --> 01:28:55.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:55.130 --> 01:28:56.110 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:28:56.110 --> 01:28:56.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:56.890 --> 01:28:57.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:57.930 --> 01:28:58.930 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:28:58.930 --> 01:28:59.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:28:59.430 --> 01:29:01.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:29:01.430 --> 01:29:02.430 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:29:02.430 --> 01:29:03.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:29:03.430 --> 01:29:03.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:29:03.930 --> 01:29:07.930 align:middle line:90% 01:29:07.930 --> 01:29:09.930 align:middle line:84% Senator from Plymouth, mister deMacedo. 01:29:09.930 --> 01:29:12.930 align:middle line:84% President have I been recorded in the negative? 01:29:12.930 --> 01:29:13.930 align:middle line:90% I must have misspoken. 01:29:13.930 --> 01:29:17.930 align:middle line:84% I wish to be recorded in the affirmative. 01:29:17.930 --> 01:29:21.430 align:middle line:90% deMacedo votes yes. 01:29:21.430 --> 01:29:22.930 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:29:22.930 --> 01:29:30.930 align:middle line:90% 01:29:30.930 --> 01:29:33.000 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 37 members having 01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:35.700 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, zero members 01:29:35.700 --> 01:29:37.150 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:29:37.150 --> 01:29:39.630 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 01:29:39.630 --> 01:29:41.220 align:middle line:90% of his excellency the governor. 01:29:41.220 --> 01:29:43.030 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:29:43.030 --> 01:29:46.980 align:middle line:84% Item 5911-1003 contained in section two 01:29:46.980 --> 01:29:50.460 align:middle line:84% relative to the Department of Developmental Services 01:29:50.460 --> 01:29:52.440 align:middle line:84% Administration operations comes from the House 01:29:52.440 --> 01:29:53.898 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement that this item 01:29:53.898 --> 01:29:56.400 align:middle line:84% is passed not withstanding the reduction and objections 01:29:56.400 --> 01:29:59.717 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor 137 to 17. 01:29:59.717 --> 01:30:01.800 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:30:01.800 --> 01:30:04.380 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:30:04.380 --> 01:30:05.850 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:30:05.850 --> 01:30:07.470 align:middle line:84% This chair recognizes the gentleman 01:30:07.470 --> 01:30:09.480 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator deMacedo. 01:30:09.480 --> 01:30:11.460 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you 01:30:11.460 --> 01:30:13.110 align:middle line:90% to my good friend from Everett. 01:30:13.110 --> 01:30:15.030 align:middle line:84% I hope that he might be able to give us 01:30:15.030 --> 01:30:21.810 align:middle line:84% an explanation in regards to item 5911-1003. 01:30:21.810 --> 01:30:25.709 align:middle line:84% And it seems to be a $50,000 reduction by the governor. 01:30:25.709 --> 01:30:27.750 align:middle line:84% And I'm hoping we might get an explanation of why 01:30:27.750 --> 01:30:28.541 align:middle line:90% we should override. 01:30:28.541 --> 01:30:30.270 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:30:30.270 --> 01:30:31.770 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:30:31.770 --> 01:30:34.410 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:30:34.410 --> 01:30:36.270 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:30:36.270 --> 01:30:39.450 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate $50,000 in a DVS admin 01:30:39.450 --> 01:30:42.720 align:middle line:84% account dedicated to the U Mass center for autism 01:30:42.720 --> 01:30:44.434 align:middle line:84% and neurodevelopmental disorders. 01:30:44.434 --> 01:30:46.350 align:middle line:84% This is an outpatient clinic and collaborative 01:30:46.350 --> 01:30:49.317 align:middle line:84% effort that provides cutting edge services to patients, 01:30:49.317 --> 01:30:51.900 align:middle line:84% particularly young adults with emotional behavioral challenges 01:30:51.900 --> 01:30:55.425 align:middle line:84% and complex presentations in the central Massachusetts area. 01:30:55.425 --> 01:30:58.917 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:30:58.917 --> 01:31:00.354 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:31:00.354 --> 01:31:03.228 align:middle line:90% 01:31:03.228 --> 01:31:04.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:04.190 --> 01:31:05.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:05.120 --> 01:31:05.960 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:31:05.960 --> 01:31:07.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:07.170 --> 01:31:07.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:07.760 --> 01:31:08.570 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:31:08.570 --> 01:31:09.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:09.080 --> 01:31:09.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:09.750 --> 01:31:10.490 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:31:10.490 --> 01:31:11.090 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:31:11.090 --> 01:31:11.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:11.750 --> 01:31:13.130 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:31:13.130 --> 01:31:13.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:13.700 --> 01:31:14.660 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:31:14.660 --> 01:31:15.580 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:15.580 --> 01:31:16.910 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:16.910 --> 01:31:17.458 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:31:17.458 --> 01:31:17.957 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:17.957 --> 01:31:18.891 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:18.891 --> 01:31:19.660 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:31:19.660 --> 01:31:20.556 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:20.556 --> 01:31:21.452 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:31:21.452 --> 01:31:22.348 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:22.348 --> 01:31:23.244 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:23.244 --> 01:31:24.640 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:31:24.640 --> 01:31:25.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:25.140 --> 01:31:25.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:25.670 --> 01:31:26.330 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:31:26.330 --> 01:31:27.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:27.090 --> 01:31:27.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:27.960 --> 01:31:28.590 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:31:28.590 --> 01:31:29.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:29.310 --> 01:31:29.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:29.890 --> 01:31:30.440 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:31:30.440 --> 01:31:31.390 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:31.390 --> 01:31:32.352 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:32.352 --> 01:31:33.256 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:31:33.256 --> 01:31:34.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:34.160 --> 01:31:34.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:34.790 --> 01:31:35.602 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:31:35.602 --> 01:31:36.102 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:36.102 --> 01:31:36.602 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:36.602 --> 01:31:37.366 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:31:37.366 --> 01:31:37.866 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:37.866 --> 01:31:38.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:38.750 --> 01:31:39.610 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:31:39.610 --> 01:31:40.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:40.550 --> 01:31:41.770 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:31:41.770 --> 01:31:42.530 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:42.530 --> 01:31:43.030 align:middle line:90% No. 01:31:43.030 --> 01:31:44.286 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:31:44.286 --> 01:31:45.244 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:45.244 --> 01:31:45.744 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:45.744 --> 01:31:46.702 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:31:46.702 --> 01:31:47.202 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:47.202 --> 01:31:48.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:48.180 --> 01:31:48.720 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:31:48.720 --> 01:31:49.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:49.760 --> 01:31:50.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:50.450 --> 01:31:51.060 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:31:51.060 --> 01:31:51.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:51.720 --> 01:31:52.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:52.220 --> 01:31:53.320 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:31:53.320 --> 01:31:54.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:54.070 --> 01:31:54.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:54.750 --> 01:31:55.390 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:31:55.390 --> 01:31:56.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:56.240 --> 01:31:56.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:56.750 --> 01:31:57.823 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:31:57.823 --> 01:31:58.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:58.530 --> 01:31:59.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:31:59.030 --> 01:32:00.386 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:32:00.386 --> 01:32:01.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:01.180 --> 01:32:01.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:01.700 --> 01:32:02.240 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:32:02.240 --> 01:32:03.231 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:03.231 --> 01:32:03.731 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:03.731 --> 01:32:04.725 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:32:04.725 --> 01:32:05.719 align:middle line:90% No. 01:32:05.719 --> 01:32:06.220 align:middle line:90% No. 01:32:06.220 --> 01:32:07.516 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:32:07.516 --> 01:32:08.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:08.230 --> 01:32:08.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:08.780 --> 01:32:10.690 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:32:10.690 --> 01:32:11.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:11.190 --> 01:32:12.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:12.040 --> 01:32:12.750 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:32:12.750 --> 01:32:13.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:13.400 --> 01:32:14.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:14.110 --> 01:32:15.180 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:32:15.180 --> 01:32:16.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:16.060 --> 01:32:16.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:16.660 --> 01:32:18.068 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:32:18.068 --> 01:32:18.568 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:18.568 --> 01:32:19.068 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:19.068 --> 01:32:21.430 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:32:21.430 --> 01:32:24.292 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:32:24.292 --> 01:32:25.723 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:32:25.723 --> 01:32:26.680 align:middle line:90% No. 01:32:26.680 --> 01:32:27.350 align:middle line:90% No. 01:32:27.350 --> 01:32:27.960 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:32:27.960 --> 01:32:28.948 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:28.948 --> 01:32:29.448 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:29.448 --> 01:32:31.924 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:32:31.924 --> 01:32:32.424 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:32:32.424 --> 01:32:33.416 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:33.416 --> 01:32:34.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:32:34.900 --> 01:32:35.400 align:middle line:90% 36. 01:32:35.400 --> 01:32:40.370 align:middle line:90% 01:32:40.370 --> 01:32:41.870 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentlelady 01:32:41.870 --> 01:32:44.100 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Norfolk, senator Spilka. 01:32:44.100 --> 01:32:45.060 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:32:45.060 --> 01:32:48.420 align:middle line:90% 01:32:48.420 --> 01:32:51.300 align:middle line:90% Spilka votes yes. 01:32:51.300 --> 01:32:52.930 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:32:52.930 --> 01:32:56.110 align:middle line:84% from Norfolk, Bristol, and Middlesex, Mr. Ross. 01:32:56.110 --> 01:32:57.090 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:32:57.090 --> 01:33:01.990 align:middle line:90% 01:33:01.990 --> 01:33:05.910 align:middle line:90% Ross votes no. 01:33:05.910 --> 01:33:07.380 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:33:07.380 --> 01:33:12.790 align:middle line:90% 01:33:12.790 --> 01:33:14.530 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 30 members having 01:33:14.530 --> 01:33:16.720 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, seven members 01:33:16.720 --> 01:33:18.300 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:33:18.300 --> 01:33:21.900 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:33:21.900 --> 01:33:23.440 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:33:23.440 --> 01:33:24.910 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:33:24.910 --> 01:33:29.170 align:middle line:84% Item 5911-2000 contained in section two, transportation day 01:33:29.170 --> 01:33:30.157 align:middle line:90% and work and respite. 01:33:30.157 --> 01:33:31.865 align:middle line:84% Comes from the House with the endorsement 01:33:31.865 --> 01:33:34.160 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed [INAUDIBLE] objection 01:33:34.160 --> 01:33:37.750 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 119 to 33. 01:33:37.750 --> 01:33:39.850 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:33:39.850 --> 01:33:42.610 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor. 01:33:42.610 --> 01:33:44.770 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:33:44.770 --> 01:33:45.860 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:33:45.860 --> 01:33:47.770 align:middle line:90% Why, thank you, Mr. President. 01:33:47.770 --> 01:33:50.080 align:middle line:84% The item that appears now before the Senate 01:33:50.080 --> 01:33:54.580 align:middle line:84% appears to be 5911-2000, relative to community 01:33:54.580 --> 01:33:55.990 align:middle line:90% transportation services. 01:33:55.990 --> 01:33:59.560 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we can get an explanation of this item 01:33:59.560 --> 01:34:02.470 align:middle line:84% and what the impact of the veto is 01:34:02.470 --> 01:34:04.820 align:middle line:84% and why we're being asked to override it, 01:34:04.820 --> 01:34:06.610 align:middle line:84% if we are being asked to override it. 01:34:06.610 --> 01:34:08.590 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:34:08.590 --> 01:34:10.060 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:34:10.060 --> 01:34:13.090 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:34:13.090 --> 01:34:14.800 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:34:14.800 --> 01:34:16.915 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce the transportation and day 01:34:16.915 --> 01:34:21.990 align:middle line:84% in work and respite account and DDS by $363,000. 01:34:21.990 --> 01:34:24.100 align:middle line:84% The account provides all transportation services 01:34:24.100 --> 01:34:27.850 align:middle line:84% for DDS clients, including those who have just turned 22. 01:34:27.850 --> 01:34:29.650 align:middle line:84% It is essential that we support DDS 01:34:29.650 --> 01:34:32.190 align:middle line:84% to fulfill all of its client's transportation needs 01:34:32.190 --> 01:34:35.560 align:middle line:84% and allot the department sufficient resources to respond 01:34:35.560 --> 01:34:37.700 align:middle line:90% to client's changing needs. 01:34:37.700 --> 01:34:40.804 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:34:40.804 --> 01:34:42.238 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:34:42.238 --> 01:34:45.584 align:middle line:90% 01:34:45.584 --> 01:34:46.540 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:34:46.540 --> 01:34:47.295 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:47.295 --> 01:34:49.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:49.120 --> 01:34:50.910 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:34:50.910 --> 01:34:51.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:51.500 --> 01:34:52.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:52.280 --> 01:34:53.000 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:53.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:53.940 --> 01:34:56.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:56.760 --> 01:34:57.670 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:34:57.670 --> 01:34:58.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:58.170 --> 01:34:59.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:34:59.830 --> 01:35:00.771 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:35:00.771 --> 01:35:01.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:01.270 --> 01:35:03.271 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:03.271 --> 01:35:04.202 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:35:04.202 --> 01:35:04.702 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:04.702 --> 01:35:06.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:06.140 --> 01:35:07.060 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:35:07.060 --> 01:35:07.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:07.560 --> 01:35:08.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:08.750 --> 01:35:09.320 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:35:09.320 --> 01:35:09.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:09.820 --> 01:35:11.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:11.240 --> 01:35:11.740 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:35:11.740 --> 01:35:12.740 align:middle line:90% No. 01:35:12.740 --> 01:35:14.240 align:middle line:90% No. 01:35:14.240 --> 01:35:15.070 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:35:15.070 --> 01:35:15.570 align:middle line:90% Yes 01:35:15.570 --> 01:35:17.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:17.450 --> 01:35:18.342 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:35:18.342 --> 01:35:18.842 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:18.842 --> 01:35:20.315 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:20.315 --> 01:35:21.788 align:middle line:90% Two to 10, right? 01:35:21.788 --> 01:35:22.770 align:middle line:90% Eldridge. 01:35:22.770 --> 01:35:23.752 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:23.752 --> 01:35:25.215 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:25.215 --> 01:35:25.715 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:35:25.715 --> 01:35:26.430 align:middle line:90% No. 01:35:26.430 --> 01:35:26.960 align:middle line:90% No. 01:35:26.960 --> 01:35:28.100 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:35:28.100 --> 01:35:28.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:28.840 --> 01:35:29.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:29.920 --> 01:35:30.840 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:35:30.840 --> 01:35:31.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:31.600 --> 01:35:32.421 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:32.421 --> 01:35:32.920 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:35:32.920 --> 01:35:33.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:33.700 --> 01:35:34.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:34.570 --> 01:35:35.850 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:35:35.850 --> 01:35:36.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:36.610 --> 01:35:37.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:37.830 --> 01:35:38.350 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:35:38.350 --> 01:35:39.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:39.440 --> 01:35:40.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:40.780 --> 01:35:41.290 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:35:41.290 --> 01:35:41.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:41.980 --> 01:35:43.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:43.170 --> 01:35:43.830 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:35:43.830 --> 01:35:44.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:44.570 --> 01:35:45.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:45.730 --> 01:35:46.310 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:35:46.310 --> 01:35:47.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:47.170 --> 01:35:48.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:48.440 --> 01:35:49.030 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:35:49.030 --> 01:35:49.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:49.980 --> 01:35:51.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:51.280 --> 01:35:51.850 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:35:51.850 --> 01:35:52.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:52.810 --> 01:35:53.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:53.980 --> 01:35:54.910 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:35:54.910 --> 01:35:55.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:55.690 --> 01:35:56.725 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:56.725 --> 01:35:57.621 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:35:57.621 --> 01:35:58.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:58.120 --> 01:35:59.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:35:59.500 --> 01:36:00.740 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:36:00.740 --> 01:36:01.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:01.480 --> 01:36:02.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:02.570 --> 01:36:03.383 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:36:03.383 --> 01:36:04.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:04.330 --> 01:36:05.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:05.590 --> 01:36:06.616 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:36:06.616 --> 01:36:07.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:07.310 --> 01:36:08.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:08.560 --> 01:36:09.620 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:36:09.620 --> 01:36:10.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:10.210 --> 01:36:11.258 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:11.258 --> 01:36:12.602 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:36:12.602 --> 01:36:13.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:13.500 --> 01:36:14.431 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:14.431 --> 01:36:14.930 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:36:14.930 --> 01:36:15.866 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:15.866 --> 01:36:16.802 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:16.802 --> 01:36:17.738 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:36:17.738 --> 01:36:18.674 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:18.674 --> 01:36:20.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:20.080 --> 01:36:21.310 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:36:21.310 --> 01:36:22.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:22.780 --> 01:36:23.760 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:36:23.760 --> 01:36:24.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:24.740 --> 01:36:25.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:25.720 --> 01:36:27.000 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:27.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:27.500 --> 01:36:28.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:28.270 --> 01:36:29.210 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:36:29.210 --> 01:36:30.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:30.010 --> 01:36:30.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:30.890 --> 01:36:31.390 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:36:31.390 --> 01:36:32.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:32.180 --> 01:36:33.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:36:33.360 --> 01:36:35.274 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:36:35.274 --> 01:36:36.270 align:middle line:90% Everybody. 01:36:36.270 --> 01:36:41.748 align:middle line:90% 01:36:41.748 --> 01:36:43.740 align:middle line:84% 35 in the affirmative two in the negative. 01:36:43.740 --> 01:36:46.170 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 35 members having been 01:36:46.170 --> 01:36:48.620 align:middle line:90% voted in the affirmative-- 01:36:48.620 --> 01:36:49.360 align:middle line:90% five? 01:36:49.360 --> 01:36:51.220 align:middle line:84% Two members having voted in the negative. 01:36:51.220 --> 01:36:53.280 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 01:36:53.280 --> 01:36:54.790 align:middle line:90% of his excellency the governor. 01:36:54.790 --> 01:36:56.670 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:36:56.670 --> 01:37:00.330 align:middle line:84% Item 5920-2000 contained in section two 01:37:00.330 --> 01:37:02.870 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement this item has 01:37:02.870 --> 01:37:05.370 align:middle line:84% passed notwithstanding that reduction of his excellency 01:37:05.370 --> 01:37:08.797 align:middle line:84% the governor by a vote of 128 to 23. 01:37:08.797 --> 01:37:10.880 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:37:10.880 --> 01:37:13.320 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:37:13.320 --> 01:37:14.640 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:37:14.640 --> 01:37:16.200 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:37:16.200 --> 01:37:18.600 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator deMacedo. 01:37:18.600 --> 01:37:20.130 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and again 01:37:20.130 --> 01:37:21.930 align:middle line:84% we would like an explanation in regards 01:37:21.930 --> 01:37:24.730 align:middle line:90% to what this line item does. 01:37:24.730 --> 01:37:26.800 align:middle line:84% It is, looks to me that the conference committee 01:37:26.800 --> 01:37:34.260 align:middle line:84% report was $1,164,000,000 and it was a $6.8 million cut. 01:37:34.260 --> 01:37:37.570 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we might get an explanation of why. 01:37:37.570 --> 01:37:39.450 align:middle line:84% This chair recognizes the senator 01:37:39.450 --> 01:37:42.260 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:37:42.260 --> 01:37:43.950 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:37:43.950 --> 01:37:45.450 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce the community 01:37:45.450 --> 01:37:47.290 align:middle line:84% residential and vendor operated services 01:37:47.290 --> 01:37:50.242 align:middle line:90% in DDS by over $6.8 million. 01:37:50.242 --> 01:37:52.230 align:middle line:84% That's will compromise annualized funding 01:37:52.230 --> 01:37:54.340 align:middle line:90% for [INAUDIBLE] graduates. 01:37:54.340 --> 01:37:57.420 align:middle line:84% There were 900 of the individuals in FY 2017 01:37:57.420 --> 01:38:03.572 align:middle line:84% and a projected number of 975 individuals in FY 2018. 01:38:03.572 --> 01:38:06.030 align:middle line:84% Support includes residential placements and other resources 01:38:06.030 --> 01:38:09.780 align:middle line:84% needed to help these individuals thrive in their communities. 01:38:09.780 --> 01:38:12.960 align:middle line:84% I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:38:12.960 --> 01:38:14.700 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:38:14.700 --> 01:38:18.090 align:middle line:84% from Plymouth and Bristol, senator Pacheco. 01:38:18.090 --> 01:38:20.110 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Mr. President, 01:38:20.110 --> 01:38:27.802 align:middle line:84% and through you to the assistant vice chair of ways and means, 01:38:27.802 --> 01:38:30.030 align:middle line:84% the gentlemen that has just spoken, 01:38:30.030 --> 01:38:33.390 align:middle line:84% because I just want to make sure I'm-- 01:38:33.390 --> 01:38:35.520 align:middle line:84% I've been paying very close attention 01:38:35.520 --> 01:38:40.830 align:middle line:84% to many of the amendments that are overridden. 01:38:40.830 --> 01:38:43.755 align:middle line:84% And thinking about the history as 01:38:43.755 --> 01:38:50.050 align:middle line:84% to how we got here and the very specific 01:38:50.050 --> 01:38:54.130 align:middle line:84% questions that our friends in the minority party are asking, 01:38:54.130 --> 01:38:59.140 align:middle line:84% to make sure that we all understand what 01:38:59.140 --> 01:39:01.040 align:middle line:90% is taking place. 01:39:01.040 --> 01:39:04.820 align:middle line:84% And as I understand it, the amendment before us, 01:39:04.820 --> 01:39:07.810 align:middle line:84% and the last couple of amendments that we just 01:39:07.810 --> 01:39:12.280 align:middle line:84% adopted the override on, were dealing 01:39:12.280 --> 01:39:18.064 align:middle line:90% with developmental disabilities. 01:39:18.064 --> 01:39:19.000 align:middle line:90% Were they not? 01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:23.680 align:middle line:90% 01:39:23.680 --> 01:39:27.460 align:middle line:84% Middlesex and Suffolk senator DiDomenico. 01:39:27.460 --> 01:39:29.272 align:middle line:84% Senate shall be in a brief recess. 01:39:29.272 --> 01:39:42.826 align:middle line:90% 01:39:42.826 --> 01:39:45.200 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes the gentleman from Plymouth and Bristol, 01:39:45.200 --> 01:39:46.910 align:middle line:90% senator Pacheco. 01:39:46.910 --> 01:39:48.350 align:middle line:90% Yes, Mr. President. 01:39:48.350 --> 01:39:52.250 align:middle line:84% Again, my question to the vice chair 01:39:52.250 --> 01:39:54.080 align:middle line:84% is, I just want to make sure this is clear 01:39:54.080 --> 01:40:00.290 align:middle line:84% that this is, in fact, the amendment that take services 01:40:00.290 --> 01:40:06.810 align:middle line:84% away from the developmentally disabled in the Commonwealth, 01:40:06.810 --> 01:40:11.890 align:middle line:84% where we have a waiting list for this particular program. 01:40:11.890 --> 01:40:14.930 align:middle line:84% I just want to make sure this is clear to me 01:40:14.930 --> 01:40:19.900 align:middle line:84% because as I understand it, the governor vetoed 01:40:19.900 --> 01:40:25.090 align:middle line:84% this piece and this is going to take services away 01:40:25.090 --> 01:40:29.290 align:middle line:90% from these people. 01:40:29.290 --> 01:40:32.790 align:middle line:84% I just want to make sure I'm clear on that. 01:40:32.790 --> 01:40:34.570 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentlelady 01:40:34.570 --> 01:40:37.570 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Norfolk, senator Spilka. 01:40:37.570 --> 01:40:39.340 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:40:39.340 --> 01:40:45.850 align:middle line:84% This cut of almost $7 million is in the DDS community 01:40:45.850 --> 01:40:51.020 align:middle line:84% residential and vendor operated services. 01:40:51.020 --> 01:40:55.000 align:middle line:84% So these are programs specifically targeted 01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:01.150 align:middle line:84% to this line item are for the annualization of people who 01:41:01.150 --> 01:41:04.390 align:middle line:90% had turned 22 in this program. 01:41:04.390 --> 01:41:08.960 align:middle line:84% You become eligible for DDS when you turn 22. 01:41:08.960 --> 01:41:12.130 align:middle line:84% And that's been a big thing that the Senate has 01:41:12.130 --> 01:41:16.990 align:middle line:84% tried to end the waiting list of turning 22 so that everybody 01:41:16.990 --> 01:41:18.830 align:middle line:90% gets services. 01:41:18.830 --> 01:41:23.380 align:middle line:84% This when they turn 23, 24, the line 01:41:23.380 --> 01:41:28.840 align:middle line:84% items of the subsequent years may 01:41:28.840 --> 01:41:31.750 align:middle line:84% increase because there's an increased number, 01:41:31.750 --> 01:41:34.600 align:middle line:84% and specifically for this line item, 01:41:34.600 --> 01:41:40.990 align:middle line:84% there have been more turning 22 clients, or consumers. 01:41:40.990 --> 01:41:45.370 align:middle line:84% This would cut the programs delivered to those 01:41:45.370 --> 01:41:49.570 align:middle line:90% who are 23, 24, and go on. 01:41:49.570 --> 01:41:54.400 align:middle line:84% Not the actual consumers who are turning 22, 01:41:54.400 --> 01:41:57.820 align:middle line:84% but who have already turned 22 and are 01:41:57.820 --> 01:42:00.160 align:middle line:90% in need of continued services. 01:42:00.160 --> 01:42:02.790 align:middle line:90% 01:42:02.790 --> 01:42:03.790 align:middle line:90% The-- 01:42:03.790 --> 01:42:05.530 align:middle line:90% Veto. 01:42:05.530 --> 01:42:08.200 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes the gentleman from Plymouth and Bristol, 01:42:08.200 --> 01:42:09.580 align:middle line:90% senator Pacheco. 01:42:09.580 --> 01:42:11.549 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Mr. President, and through 01:42:11.549 --> 01:42:12.340 align:middle line:90% you to the members. 01:42:12.340 --> 01:42:16.990 align:middle line:84% Again, it's as I had anticipated. 01:42:16.990 --> 01:42:18.760 align:middle line:84% I just wanted to make sure I was clear 01:42:18.760 --> 01:42:22.390 align:middle line:84% because not only on this override, 01:42:22.390 --> 01:42:27.020 align:middle line:84% but really on all the overrides that we're dealing with, 01:42:27.020 --> 01:42:28.660 align:middle line:84% it's a matter of whether or not you 01:42:28.660 --> 01:42:34.252 align:middle line:84% want to have the services provided or the services cut. 01:42:34.252 --> 01:42:38.510 align:middle line:90% 01:42:38.510 --> 01:42:43.370 align:middle line:84% We're talking about developmental disabilities 01:42:43.370 --> 01:42:45.170 align:middle line:90% in this one. 01:42:45.170 --> 01:42:51.530 align:middle line:84% The one prior, it was children's mental health services. 01:42:51.530 --> 01:42:54.530 align:middle line:84% The one prior to that was children's mental health 01:42:54.530 --> 01:42:56.270 align:middle line:90% services. 01:42:56.270 --> 01:42:59.220 align:middle line:84% The one prior to that was adult mental health services. 01:42:59.220 --> 01:43:01.980 align:middle line:90% 01:43:01.980 --> 01:43:06.170 align:middle line:84% Mental health services that were cut. 01:43:06.170 --> 01:43:10.340 align:middle line:90% 01:43:10.340 --> 01:43:16.850 align:middle line:84% And we're asking to override the veto so these services can 01:43:16.850 --> 01:43:22.850 align:middle line:84% be provided to some of the most vulnerable in our state. 01:43:22.850 --> 01:43:25.594 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I hope the override passes. 01:43:25.594 --> 01:43:28.576 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:43:28.576 --> 01:43:30.564 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:43:30.564 --> 01:43:31.558 align:middle line:90% 37. 01:43:31.558 --> 01:43:32.549 align:middle line:90% OK. 01:43:32.549 --> 01:43:33.049 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:43:33.049 --> 01:43:36.028 align:middle line:90% 01:43:36.028 --> 01:43:36.528 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:43:36.528 --> 01:43:40.020 align:middle line:90% 01:43:40.020 --> 01:43:41.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:41.500 --> 01:43:42.460 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:43:42.460 --> 01:43:42.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:42.960 --> 01:43:44.076 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:44.076 --> 01:43:44.576 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:43:44.576 --> 01:43:45.562 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:45.562 --> 01:43:46.548 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:46.548 --> 01:43:48.020 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:43:48.020 --> 01:43:48.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:48.520 --> 01:43:49.992 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:49.992 --> 01:43:50.492 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:43:50.492 --> 01:43:53.450 align:middle line:90% 01:43:53.450 --> 01:43:54.929 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:43:54.929 --> 01:43:55.908 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:55.908 --> 01:43:56.408 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:56.408 --> 01:43:57.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:57.890 --> 01:43:58.790 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:43:58.790 --> 01:43:59.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:43:59.330 --> 01:44:00.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:00.420 --> 01:44:01.181 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:44:01.181 --> 01:44:01.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:01.680 --> 01:44:02.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:02.610 --> 01:44:03.330 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:44:03.330 --> 01:44:04.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:04.210 --> 01:44:04.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:04.990 --> 01:44:05.880 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:44:05.880 --> 01:44:06.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:06.650 --> 01:44:07.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:07.700 --> 01:44:08.580 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:44:08.580 --> 01:44:09.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:09.800 --> 01:44:10.596 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:10.596 --> 01:44:11.530 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:44:11.530 --> 01:44:12.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:12.210 --> 01:44:13.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:13.380 --> 01:44:15.925 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:44:15.925 --> 01:44:16.425 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:16.425 --> 01:44:17.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:17.880 --> 01:44:18.658 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:44:18.658 --> 01:44:19.158 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:19.158 --> 01:44:20.146 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:20.146 --> 01:44:22.616 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:44:22.616 --> 01:44:24.730 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:44:24.730 --> 01:44:25.510 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:44:25.510 --> 01:44:26.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:26.010 --> 01:44:27.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:27.690 --> 01:44:28.491 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:44:28.491 --> 01:44:28.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:28.990 --> 01:44:30.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:30.370 --> 01:44:31.360 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:44:31.360 --> 01:44:32.845 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:32.845 --> 01:44:33.830 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:44:33.830 --> 01:44:34.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:34.330 --> 01:44:35.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:35.320 --> 01:44:36.805 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:44:36.805 --> 01:44:37.795 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:37.795 --> 01:44:38.785 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:38.785 --> 01:44:40.270 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:44:40.270 --> 01:44:41.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:41.260 --> 01:44:42.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:42.250 --> 01:44:43.235 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:44:43.235 --> 01:44:43.735 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:43.735 --> 01:44:44.725 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:44.725 --> 01:44:45.715 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:44:45.715 --> 01:44:46.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:46.730 --> 01:44:48.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:48.440 --> 01:44:49.040 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:44:49.040 --> 01:44:49.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:49.970 --> 01:44:50.915 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:50.915 --> 01:44:51.880 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:44:51.880 --> 01:44:52.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:52.620 --> 01:44:54.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:54.210 --> 01:44:55.081 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:44:55.081 --> 01:44:55.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:55.580 --> 01:44:56.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:56.540 --> 01:44:57.720 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:44:57.720 --> 01:44:58.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:44:58.520 --> 01:45:00.305 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:00.305 --> 01:45:01.706 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:45:01.706 --> 01:45:02.678 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:02.678 --> 01:45:03.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:03.650 --> 01:45:05.108 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:45:05.108 --> 01:45:06.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:06.080 --> 01:45:07.052 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:07.052 --> 01:45:08.024 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:45:08.024 --> 01:45:08.996 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:08.996 --> 01:45:09.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:09.980 --> 01:45:10.900 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:45:10.900 --> 01:45:11.400 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:45:11.400 --> 01:45:12.466 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:12.466 --> 01:45:13.438 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:45:13.438 --> 01:45:14.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:14.410 --> 01:45:15.486 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:15.486 --> 01:45:15.986 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:45:15.986 --> 01:45:16.962 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:16.962 --> 01:45:18.426 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:18.426 --> 01:45:19.402 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:45:19.402 --> 01:45:20.378 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:20.378 --> 01:45:21.354 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:21.354 --> 01:45:23.782 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:45:23.782 --> 01:45:24.282 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:45:24.282 --> 01:45:25.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:25.260 --> 01:45:26.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:26.690 --> 01:45:28.100 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:45:28.100 --> 01:45:29.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:29.980 --> 01:45:30.920 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:45:30.920 --> 01:45:31.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:31.860 --> 01:45:32.975 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:32.975 --> 01:45:33.965 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:45:33.965 --> 01:45:35.945 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:45:35.945 --> 01:45:37.920 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:45:37.920 --> 01:45:38.420 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:45:38.420 --> 01:45:42.375 align:middle line:90% 01:45:42.375 --> 01:45:42.875 align:middle line:90% 36? 01:45:42.875 --> 01:45:43.860 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:45:43.860 --> 01:45:44.360 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 01:45:44.360 --> 01:45:50.790 align:middle line:90% 01:45:50.790 --> 01:45:51.290 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:45:51.290 --> 01:46:00.702 align:middle line:90% 01:46:00.702 --> 01:46:02.330 align:middle line:90% He voted. 01:46:02.330 --> 01:46:03.800 align:middle line:90% No, he voted. 01:46:03.800 --> 01:46:08.210 align:middle line:90% No, you've got to call him. 01:46:08.210 --> 01:46:11.150 align:middle line:84% Senator for Hamden, senator Welch. 01:46:11.150 --> 01:46:15.070 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] desire to be recorded in the affirmative. 01:46:15.070 --> 01:46:18.010 align:middle line:90% Welch votes yes. 01:46:18.010 --> 01:46:19.960 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:46:19.960 --> 01:46:20.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:46:20.460 --> 01:46:25.360 align:middle line:90% 01:46:25.360 --> 01:46:27.520 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 37 members having 01:46:27.520 --> 01:46:29.560 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, no members 01:46:29.560 --> 01:46:31.250 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:46:31.250 --> 01:46:34.210 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:46:34.210 --> 01:46:35.680 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:46:35.680 --> 01:46:39.180 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:46:39.180 --> 01:46:43.062 align:middle line:84% Item 5920-2010, DDS state operated 01:46:43.062 --> 01:46:45.145 align:middle line:84% programs comes from the House with the endorsement 01:46:45.145 --> 01:46:47.436 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the reduction 01:46:47.436 --> 01:46:50.607 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 122 to 32. 01:46:50.607 --> 01:46:52.690 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 01:46:52.690 --> 01:46:55.060 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:46:55.060 --> 01:46:56.440 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:46:56.440 --> 01:46:58.900 align:middle line:84% The senator recognizes the gentleman 01:46:58.900 --> 01:47:01.900 align:middle line:90% from Plymouth, senator deMacedo. 01:47:01.900 --> 01:47:02.530 align:middle line:90% Thank you-- 01:47:02.530 --> 01:47:03.530 align:middle line:90% You did a shuffle there. 01:47:03.530 --> 01:47:06.110 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to my members-- 01:47:06.110 --> 01:47:08.560 align:middle line:90% or, not my members, our members. 01:47:08.560 --> 01:47:11.830 align:middle line:90% 01:47:11.830 --> 01:47:18.640 align:middle line:84% I'm here in reference to line item 5920-2010, 01:47:18.640 --> 01:47:21.820 align:middle line:84% state operated community based residential services. 01:47:21.820 --> 01:47:27.760 align:middle line:84% In FY 17 we spent 218 million dollars. 01:47:27.760 --> 01:47:30.730 align:middle line:84% And when I looked at the budget in the House and the Senate, 01:47:30.730 --> 01:47:34.030 align:middle line:90% we spent only $216 million. 01:47:34.030 --> 01:47:37.420 align:middle line:84% My question is, why did we reduce that line item 01:47:37.420 --> 01:47:42.400 align:middle line:84% by $2 million in the legislature for community 01:47:42.400 --> 01:47:44.170 align:middle line:90% based residential services? 01:47:44.170 --> 01:47:46.720 align:middle line:90% Thank you Mr. President. 01:47:46.720 --> 01:47:48.820 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:47:48.820 --> 01:47:54.310 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:47:54.310 --> 01:47:56.380 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:47:56.380 --> 01:47:58.870 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate local priority in the DDS respite 01:47:58.870 --> 01:48:02.629 align:middle line:84% and family serves account totaling $180,000. 01:48:02.629 --> 01:48:05.170 align:middle line:84% The funding would be allocated to the state operator programs 01:48:05.170 --> 01:48:08.440 align:middle line:84% account which funds 24 hour residential services provided 01:48:08.440 --> 01:48:09.590 align:middle line:90% by state employees. 01:48:09.590 --> 01:48:11.380 align:middle line:84% The eliminated funding was allocated 01:48:11.380 --> 01:48:15.887 align:middle line:84% to the Tetris House in Cohasset to support maintenance repairs. 01:48:15.887 --> 01:48:18.809 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:48:18.809 --> 01:48:23.680 align:middle line:90% 01:48:23.680 --> 01:48:25.750 align:middle line:84% The Senate recognizes this gentleman 01:48:25.750 --> 01:48:27.070 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:48:27.070 --> 01:48:28.120 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:48:28.120 --> 01:48:29.980 align:middle line:84% I think there may have been a little bit of confusion. 01:48:29.980 --> 01:48:32.188 align:middle line:84% I appreciate the gentleman from Everett's explanation 01:48:32.188 --> 01:48:35.170 align:middle line:84% but we have a further question with regard to this item. 01:48:35.170 --> 01:48:39.040 align:middle line:84% It appears that the final general appropriations 01:48:39.040 --> 01:48:41.200 align:middle line:84% act actually reduced funding for this item 01:48:41.200 --> 01:48:43.150 align:middle line:90% by 10 million dollars. 01:48:43.150 --> 01:48:46.330 align:middle line:84% And in fact the conference committee report 01:48:46.330 --> 01:48:50.240 align:middle line:84% reduced the Senate appropriation by about $2 million. 01:48:50.240 --> 01:48:53.290 align:middle line:84% So we're curious as to what's exactly 01:48:53.290 --> 01:48:55.930 align:middle line:84% happening here so that we can put the governor's 01:48:55.930 --> 01:49:00.700 align:middle line:84% request and the governor's action into clearer context. 01:49:00.700 --> 01:49:03.700 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:49:03.700 --> 01:49:05.410 align:middle line:84% The Senate recognizes the senator 01:49:05.410 --> 01:49:10.030 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator Spilka. 01:49:10.030 --> 01:49:10.840 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:49:10.840 --> 01:49:14.350 align:middle line:84% I just want to gently remind the minority leader 01:49:14.350 --> 01:49:20.240 align:middle line:84% that we had an $833 million gap in our budget. 01:49:20.240 --> 01:49:26.140 align:middle line:84% So unfortunately a lot of line items were cut. 01:49:26.140 --> 01:49:29.010 align:middle line:84% Most of them, you know that, well, 01:49:29.010 --> 01:49:31.390 align:middle line:90% is was a very difficult process. 01:49:31.390 --> 01:49:35.080 align:middle line:90% But we had to cut 833 million. 01:49:35.080 --> 01:49:38.770 align:middle line:84% Therefor every area of the budget 01:49:38.770 --> 01:49:42.780 align:middle line:84% saw pain and was touched by the cuts. 01:49:42.780 --> 01:49:47.140 align:middle line:90% 01:49:47.140 --> 01:49:48.640 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:49:48.640 --> 01:49:49.840 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:49:49.840 --> 01:49:51.010 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:49:51.010 --> 01:49:52.720 align:middle line:84% I appreciate that helpful reminder 01:49:52.720 --> 01:49:55.690 align:middle line:84% and I hope that we don't seem to find another helpful reminder 01:49:55.690 --> 01:49:57.610 align:middle line:84% in the form of 9C cuts that indicate 01:49:57.610 --> 01:49:59.230 align:middle line:90% we haven't done enough. 01:49:59.230 --> 01:50:01.540 align:middle line:84% But I would be very quick to point out 01:50:01.540 --> 01:50:05.140 align:middle line:84% that perhaps that's why the last account which increased 01:50:05.140 --> 01:50:09.850 align:middle line:84% by $48 million from last year was reduced 01:50:09.850 --> 01:50:12.280 align:middle line:84% by the governor, attempted to be reduced by the governor, 01:50:12.280 --> 01:50:16.000 align:middle line:90% because of that $833 gap. 01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:19.240 align:middle line:84% And it also helps to put into perspective this reduction 01:50:19.240 --> 01:50:23.770 align:middle line:84% of $180,000 because it is just possible that the governor was 01:50:23.770 --> 01:50:27.670 align:middle line:84% also trying to meet that fiscal reality in a much less 01:50:27.670 --> 01:50:30.490 align:middle line:84% severe way than we did in our own budgeting. 01:50:30.490 --> 01:50:33.800 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:50:33.800 --> 01:50:35.246 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 01:50:35.246 --> 01:50:39.084 align:middle line:90% 01:50:39.084 --> 01:50:39.584 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:50:39.584 --> 01:50:43.930 align:middle line:90% 01:50:43.930 --> 01:50:45.086 align:middle line:90% Senator Bennett? 01:50:45.086 --> 01:50:45.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:45.800 --> 01:50:47.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:47.780 --> 01:50:48.290 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:50:48.290 --> 01:50:49.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:49.250 --> 01:50:50.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:50.760 --> 01:50:51.260 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:50:51.260 --> 01:50:51.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:51.810 --> 01:50:53.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:53.180 --> 01:50:54.010 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:50:54.010 --> 01:50:54.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:54.650 --> 01:50:56.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:56.070 --> 01:50:56.580 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:50:56.580 --> 01:50:57.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:57.080 --> 01:50:58.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:50:58.250 --> 01:50:59.090 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:50:59.090 --> 01:50:59.850 align:middle line:90% No. 01:50:59.850 --> 01:51:00.748 align:middle line:90% No. 01:51:00.748 --> 01:51:02.491 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:51:02.491 --> 01:51:02.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:02.990 --> 01:51:04.064 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:04.064 --> 01:51:04.952 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:51:04.952 --> 01:51:05.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:05.840 --> 01:51:07.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:07.070 --> 01:51:07.750 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:51:07.750 --> 01:51:08.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:08.450 --> 01:51:09.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:09.740 --> 01:51:10.530 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:51:10.530 --> 01:51:11.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:11.340 --> 01:51:12.233 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:12.233 --> 01:51:13.020 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:51:13.020 --> 01:51:13.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:13.740 --> 01:51:15.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:15.040 --> 01:51:15.800 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:51:15.800 --> 01:51:16.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:16.300 --> 01:51:17.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:17.600 --> 01:51:18.110 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:51:18.110 --> 01:51:18.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:18.860 --> 01:51:20.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:20.200 --> 01:51:20.740 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:51:20.740 --> 01:51:21.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:21.470 --> 01:51:22.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:22.890 --> 01:51:23.392 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:51:23.392 --> 01:51:23.892 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:23.892 --> 01:51:24.876 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:24.876 --> 01:51:25.852 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:51:25.852 --> 01:51:26.352 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:26.352 --> 01:51:28.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:28.820 --> 01:51:29.430 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:51:29.430 --> 01:51:30.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:30.070 --> 01:51:31.271 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:31.271 --> 01:51:31.770 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:51:31.770 --> 01:51:32.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:32.520 --> 01:51:33.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:33.680 --> 01:51:34.210 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:51:34.210 --> 01:51:35.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:35.170 --> 01:51:36.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:36.380 --> 01:51:37.241 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:51:37.241 --> 01:51:37.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:37.740 --> 01:51:38.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:38.960 --> 01:51:39.950 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:51:39.950 --> 01:51:40.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:40.450 --> 01:51:41.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:41.840 --> 01:51:42.430 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:51:42.430 --> 01:51:43.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:43.740 --> 01:51:44.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:44.800 --> 01:51:45.460 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:51:45.460 --> 01:51:46.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:46.390 --> 01:51:47.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:47.470 --> 01:51:47.980 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:51:47.980 --> 01:51:48.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:48.890 --> 01:51:49.952 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:49.952 --> 01:51:50.930 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:51:50.930 --> 01:51:51.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:51.430 --> 01:51:52.994 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:52.994 --> 01:51:53.928 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:51:53.928 --> 01:51:54.862 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:54.862 --> 01:51:56.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:56.730 --> 01:51:58.100 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:51:58.100 --> 01:51:58.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:58.600 --> 01:51:59.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:51:59.830 --> 01:52:00.810 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:52:00.810 --> 01:52:01.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:01.310 --> 01:52:02.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:02.650 --> 01:52:03.550 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:52:03.550 --> 01:52:04.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:04.270 --> 01:52:05.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:05.650 --> 01:52:06.650 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:52:06.650 --> 01:52:07.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:07.330 --> 01:52:09.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:09.130 --> 01:52:09.820 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:52:09.820 --> 01:52:10.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:10.410 --> 01:52:11.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:11.710 --> 01:52:12.310 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:52:12.310 --> 01:52:13.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:13.160 --> 01:52:14.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:14.140 --> 01:52:14.970 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:52:14.970 --> 01:52:15.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:15.670 --> 01:52:16.697 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:16.697 --> 01:52:17.391 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:52:17.391 --> 01:52:17.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:17.890 --> 01:52:18.957 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:18.957 --> 01:52:19.680 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:52:19.680 --> 01:52:20.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:20.180 --> 01:52:21.702 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:21.702 --> 01:52:22.614 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:52:22.614 --> 01:52:23.982 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:23.982 --> 01:52:25.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:25.350 --> 01:52:25.970 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:52:25.970 --> 01:52:27.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:27.730 --> 01:52:29.016 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:52:29.016 --> 01:52:30.465 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:52:30.465 --> 01:52:38.680 align:middle line:90% 01:52:38.680 --> 01:52:40.870 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 36 members having 01:52:40.870 --> 01:52:42.640 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, one member 01:52:42.640 --> 01:52:44.450 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:52:44.450 --> 01:52:47.230 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:52:47.230 --> 01:52:48.420 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:52:48.420 --> 01:52:50.450 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:52:50.450 --> 01:52:55.542 align:middle line:84% Item 5920-2025 relative to DDS community day and work programs 01:52:55.542 --> 01:52:57.250 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 01:52:57.250 --> 01:52:58.958 align:middle line:84% that this item has passe not withstanding 01:52:58.958 --> 01:53:02.350 align:middle line:84% the reduction an objections of his excellency the governor 121 01:53:02.350 --> 01:53:03.490 align:middle line:90% to 33. 01:53:03.490 --> 01:53:04.960 align:middle line:90% Mr. President. 01:53:04.960 --> 01:53:08.110 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes the gentleman from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:53:08.110 --> 01:53:09.465 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 01:53:09.465 --> 01:53:11.173 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I move the Senate consider 01:53:11.173 --> 01:53:17.770 align:middle line:84% no action having been taken on item 2800-0100 entitled 01:53:17.770 --> 01:53:19.249 align:middle line:90% DCR Administration. 01:53:19.249 --> 01:53:33.053 align:middle line:90% 01:53:33.053 --> 01:53:35.025 align:middle line:84% The senate will be in a brief recess. 01:53:35.025 --> 01:53:49.827 align:middle line:90% 01:53:49.827 --> 01:53:50.910 align:middle line:90% And it will come to order. 01:53:50.910 --> 01:53:53.710 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:53:53.710 --> 01:53:55.450 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:53:55.450 --> 01:53:57.940 align:middle line:84% I request unanimous consent to withdraw my motion 01:53:57.940 --> 01:54:02.050 align:middle line:84% that the Senate consider having no action taken on item number 01:54:02.050 --> 01:54:07.000 align:middle line:90% 2800-0100. 01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:08.690 align:middle line:90% Is there any objection? 01:54:08.690 --> 01:54:11.460 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:54:11.460 --> 01:54:13.340 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 01:54:13.340 --> 01:54:14.420 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:54:14.420 --> 01:54:17.720 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I move that the Senate reconsider 01:54:17.720 --> 01:54:23.534 align:middle line:84% the action taken on item 2800-0100 entitled 01:54:23.534 --> 01:54:25.010 align:middle line:90% DCR Administration. 01:54:25.010 --> 01:54:33.870 align:middle line:90% 01:54:33.870 --> 01:54:35.510 align:middle line:84% The Senate moves reconsideration. 01:54:35.510 --> 01:54:37.436 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:54:37.436 --> 01:54:39.000 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:40.640 align:middle line:90% Mr. President? 01:54:40.640 --> 01:54:44.290 align:middle line:84% The recurring question comes, and shall 01:54:44.290 --> 01:54:47.560 align:middle line:84% this item pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:54:47.560 --> 01:54:49.885 align:middle line:90% to the contrary? 01:54:49.885 --> 01:54:51.370 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 01:54:51.370 --> 01:54:58.795 align:middle line:90% 01:54:58.795 --> 01:55:01.765 align:middle line:90% It's 188, yep. 01:55:01.765 --> 01:55:02.755 align:middle line:90% Is that OK? 01:55:02.755 --> 01:55:06.715 align:middle line:90% 01:55:06.715 --> 01:55:08.200 align:middle line:90% Yep. 01:55:08.200 --> 01:55:09.680 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:55:09.680 --> 01:55:10.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:10.180 --> 01:55:11.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:11.690 --> 01:55:12.861 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 01:55:12.861 --> 01:55:13.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:13.360 --> 01:55:14.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:14.860 --> 01:55:15.420 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:55:15.420 --> 01:55:16.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:16.090 --> 01:55:17.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:17.130 --> 01:55:18.010 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:55:18.010 --> 01:55:18.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:18.510 --> 01:55:20.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:20.490 --> 01:55:21.290 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:55:21.290 --> 01:55:21.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:21.790 --> 01:55:22.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:22.360 --> 01:55:23.740 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:55:23.740 --> 01:55:24.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:24.340 --> 01:55:25.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:25.650 --> 01:55:26.160 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:55:26.160 --> 01:55:26.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:26.660 --> 01:55:27.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:27.790 --> 01:55:28.290 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:55:28.290 --> 01:55:29.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:29.140 --> 01:55:30.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:30.300 --> 01:55:31.230 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:55:31.230 --> 01:55:31.990 align:middle line:90% No. 01:55:31.990 --> 01:55:33.160 align:middle line:90% No. 01:55:33.160 --> 01:55:33.660 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:55:33.660 --> 01:55:34.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:34.540 --> 01:55:35.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:35.680 --> 01:55:36.560 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:55:36.560 --> 01:55:37.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:37.240 --> 01:55:38.854 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:38.854 --> 01:55:39.785 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:55:39.785 --> 01:55:40.285 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:40.285 --> 01:55:41.216 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:41.216 --> 01:55:41.716 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:55:41.716 --> 01:55:42.216 align:middle line:90% No. 01:55:42.216 --> 01:55:43.830 align:middle line:90% No. 01:55:43.830 --> 01:55:44.760 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:55:44.760 --> 01:55:45.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:45.260 --> 01:55:46.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:46.370 --> 01:55:47.250 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:55:47.250 --> 01:55:47.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:47.950 --> 01:55:49.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:49.360 --> 01:55:49.860 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 01:55:49.860 --> 01:55:50.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:50.600 --> 01:55:51.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:51.670 --> 01:55:52.576 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 01:55:52.576 --> 01:55:53.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:53.270 --> 01:55:54.338 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:54.338 --> 01:55:55.274 align:middle line:90% Humason? 01:55:55.274 --> 01:55:56.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:56.210 --> 01:55:57.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:57.500 --> 01:55:58.010 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 01:55:58.010 --> 01:55:59.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:55:59.060 --> 01:56:00.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:00.570 --> 01:56:01.711 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 01:56:01.711 --> 01:56:02.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:02.210 --> 01:56:03.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:03.580 --> 01:56:04.100 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 01:56:04.100 --> 01:56:05.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:05.150 --> 01:56:06.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:06.890 --> 01:56:07.870 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 01:56:07.870 --> 01:56:08.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:08.670 --> 01:56:09.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:09.960 --> 01:56:10.721 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 01:56:10.721 --> 01:56:11.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:11.220 --> 01:56:12.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:12.410 --> 01:56:13.287 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 01:56:13.287 --> 01:56:14.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:14.480 --> 01:56:15.794 align:middle line:90% McGee? 01:56:15.794 --> 01:56:16.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:16.670 --> 01:56:17.603 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:17.603 --> 01:56:18.450 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 01:56:18.450 --> 01:56:19.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:19.880 --> 01:56:21.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:21.110 --> 01:56:22.514 align:middle line:90% Moore? 01:56:22.514 --> 01:56:23.945 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:23.945 --> 01:56:24.880 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 01:56:24.880 --> 01:56:25.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:25.380 --> 01:56:26.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:26.640 --> 01:56:27.850 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 01:56:27.850 --> 01:56:28.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:28.350 --> 01:56:29.418 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:29.418 --> 01:56:30.354 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 01:56:30.354 --> 01:56:31.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:31.290 --> 01:56:32.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:33.060 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 01:56:33.060 --> 01:56:33.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:33.740 --> 01:56:34.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:34.880 --> 01:56:36.880 align:middle line:90% Ross? 01:56:36.880 --> 01:56:37.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:37.380 --> 01:56:39.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:39.610 --> 01:56:40.550 align:middle line:90% Rush? 01:56:40.550 --> 01:56:41.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:41.050 --> 01:56:42.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:42.470 --> 01:56:43.380 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 01:56:43.380 --> 01:56:43.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:43.880 --> 01:56:45.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:45.290 --> 01:56:46.200 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 01:56:46.200 --> 01:56:46.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:46.700 --> 01:56:48.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:48.170 --> 01:56:49.110 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 01:56:49.110 --> 01:56:49.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:49.610 --> 01:56:50.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:50.970 --> 01:56:51.760 align:middle line:90% Welch? 01:56:51.760 --> 01:56:52.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:52.260 --> 01:56:53.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:56:53.190 --> 01:56:54.880 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:56:54.880 --> 01:56:57.370 align:middle line:90% That's everybody. 01:56:57.370 --> 01:57:00.920 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth, senator deMacedo? 01:57:00.920 --> 01:57:04.900 align:middle line:84% I wish to be recorded in the affirmative. 01:57:04.900 --> 01:57:07.260 align:middle line:90% deMacedo votes yes. 01:57:07.260 --> 01:57:08.695 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 01:57:08.695 --> 01:57:22.290 align:middle line:90% 01:57:22.290 --> 01:57:24.510 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 36 members having 01:57:24.510 --> 01:57:26.220 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, one member 01:57:26.220 --> 01:57:27.850 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 01:57:27.850 --> 01:57:30.956 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 01:57:30.956 --> 01:57:31.942 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 01:57:31.942 --> 01:57:38.844 align:middle line:90% 01:57:38.844 --> 01:57:40.906 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:57:40.906 --> 01:57:43.281 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I need the senate to be in a brief recess. 01:57:43.281 --> 01:57:45.253 align:middle line:84% The senate will be in a brief recess. 01:57:45.253 --> 01:57:56.560 align:middle line:90% 01:57:56.560 --> 01:57:57.810 align:middle line:90% The Senate will come to order. 01:57:57.810 --> 01:57:59.130 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 01:57:59.130 --> 01:58:04.260 align:middle line:84% Item 5920-2025 contained in section two 01:58:04.260 --> 01:58:10.003 align:middle line:84% relative to DDS community day and work programs. 01:58:10.003 --> 01:58:13.450 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] that this item has been 01:58:13.450 --> 01:58:16.150 align:middle line:84% passed notwithstanding the reduction and objections 01:58:16.150 --> 01:58:19.654 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor by a vote of 121 to 33. 01:58:19.654 --> 01:58:21.070 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:58:21.070 --> 01:58:22.630 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 01:58:22.630 --> 01:58:24.420 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 01:58:24.420 --> 01:58:25.794 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'm hoping that we 01:58:25.794 --> 01:58:28.920 align:middle line:84% can get a description of this particular item. 01:58:28.920 --> 01:58:32.110 align:middle line:84% What it does, what the amount of the reduction is, 01:58:32.110 --> 01:58:34.150 align:middle line:84% and what the impact would be if we do not 01:58:34.150 --> 01:58:39.100 align:middle line:84% override the veto of his excellency the governor. 01:58:39.100 --> 01:58:40.570 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 01:58:40.570 --> 01:58:43.450 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 01:58:43.450 --> 01:58:45.070 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 01:58:45.070 --> 01:58:47.520 align:middle line:84% This veto would reduce DDS community day and work 01:58:47.520 --> 01:58:51.735 align:middle line:84% programs account by $25,000, omitting one earmark. 01:58:51.735 --> 01:58:53.320 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate funding 01:58:53.320 --> 01:58:56.260 align:middle line:84% for Project Search, a program that encourages collaboration 01:58:56.260 --> 01:58:57.940 align:middle line:84% between partner agencies in an effort 01:58:57.940 --> 01:59:00.610 align:middle line:84% to ensure young adults with developmental disabilities 01:59:00.610 --> 01:59:02.590 align:middle line:90% achieve competitive employment. 01:59:02.590 --> 01:59:05.807 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 01:59:05.807 --> 01:59:07.803 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 01:59:07.803 --> 01:59:10.797 align:middle line:90% 01:59:10.797 --> 01:59:12.293 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 01:59:12.293 --> 01:59:12.793 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:12.793 --> 01:59:14.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:14.300 --> 01:59:15.233 align:middle line:90% Brady? 01:59:15.233 --> 01:59:16.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:16.140 --> 01:59:17.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:17.640 --> 01:59:19.060 align:middle line:90% Oh, Boncore? 01:59:19.060 --> 01:59:19.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:19.560 --> 01:59:20.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:20.060 --> 01:59:22.930 align:middle line:90% 01:59:22.930 --> 01:59:24.121 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 01:59:24.121 --> 01:59:24.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:24.620 --> 01:59:25.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:25.960 --> 01:59:26.730 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 01:59:26.730 --> 01:59:27.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:27.230 --> 01:59:29.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:29.330 --> 01:59:30.290 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 01:59:30.290 --> 01:59:30.910 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:30.910 --> 01:59:32.090 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:32.090 --> 01:59:32.880 align:middle line:90% Creem? 01:59:32.880 --> 01:59:33.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:33.380 --> 01:59:34.688 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:34.688 --> 01:59:35.430 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 01:59:35.430 --> 01:59:35.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:35.930 --> 01:59:37.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:37.060 --> 01:59:37.680 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 01:59:37.680 --> 01:59:38.390 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:38.390 --> 01:59:39.620 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:39.620 --> 01:59:40.520 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 01:59:40.520 --> 01:59:41.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:41.420 --> 01:59:42.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:42.160 --> 01:59:43.456 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 01:59:43.456 --> 01:59:44.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:44.290 --> 01:59:45.388 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:45.388 --> 01:59:46.384 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 01:59:46.384 --> 01:59:47.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:47.380 --> 01:59:48.376 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:48.376 --> 01:59:49.372 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 01:59:49.372 --> 01:59:50.368 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:50.368 --> 01:59:51.364 align:middle line:90% No. 01:59:51.364 --> 01:59:53.354 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:59:53.354 --> 01:59:53.854 align:middle line:90% Forry? 01:59:53.854 --> 01:59:57.840 align:middle line:90% 01:59:57.840 --> 01:59:58.821 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 01:59:58.821 --> 01:59:59.803 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:59:59.803 --> 02:00:00.785 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:00.785 --> 02:00:01.760 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:00:01.760 --> 02:00:02.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:02.260 --> 02:00:03.023 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:03.023 --> 02:00:03.969 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:00:03.969 --> 02:00:04.915 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:04.915 --> 02:00:05.861 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:05.861 --> 02:00:06.780 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:00:06.780 --> 02:00:07.280 align:middle line:90% No. 02:00:07.280 --> 02:00:08.570 align:middle line:90% No. 02:00:08.570 --> 02:00:09.480 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:00:09.480 --> 02:00:10.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:10.280 --> 02:00:11.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:11.410 --> 02:00:12.271 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:00:12.271 --> 02:00:12.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:12.770 --> 02:00:14.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:14.120 --> 02:00:14.700 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:00:14.700 --> 02:00:15.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:15.400 --> 02:00:16.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:16.610 --> 02:00:17.630 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:00:17.630 --> 02:00:18.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:18.450 --> 02:00:20.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:20.370 --> 02:00:21.280 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:00:21.280 --> 02:00:21.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:21.780 --> 02:00:23.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:23.190 --> 02:00:24.060 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:00:24.060 --> 02:00:24.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:24.840 --> 02:00:25.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:25.940 --> 02:00:27.080 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:00:27.080 --> 02:00:27.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:27.960 --> 02:00:29.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:29.640 --> 02:00:30.180 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:00:30.180 --> 02:00:30.679 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:30.679 --> 02:00:31.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:31.970 --> 02:00:32.970 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:00:32.970 --> 02:00:33.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:33.470 --> 02:00:34.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:34.470 --> 02:00:35.470 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:00:35.470 --> 02:00:36.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:36.470 --> 02:00:37.443 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:37.443 --> 02:00:38.835 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:00:38.835 --> 02:00:39.335 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:39.335 --> 02:00:40.281 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:40.281 --> 02:00:41.227 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:00:41.227 --> 02:00:42.173 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:42.173 --> 02:00:43.119 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:43.119 --> 02:00:44.065 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:00:44.065 --> 02:00:44.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:44.900 --> 02:00:46.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:46.170 --> 02:00:47.110 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:00:47.110 --> 02:00:47.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:47.610 --> 02:00:49.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:49.530 --> 02:00:50.070 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:00:50.070 --> 02:00:51.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:51.180 --> 02:00:52.249 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:52.249 --> 02:00:53.246 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:00:53.246 --> 02:00:53.746 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:53.746 --> 02:00:54.743 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:00:54.743 --> 02:00:55.243 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:00:55.243 --> 02:01:00.732 align:middle line:90% 02:01:00.732 --> 02:01:01.729 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:01:01.729 --> 02:01:02.229 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:02.229 --> 02:01:03.227 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:03.227 --> 02:01:04.225 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:01:04.225 --> 02:01:05.223 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:05.223 --> 02:01:06.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:06.720 --> 02:01:07.718 align:middle line:90% 31 to three. 02:01:07.718 --> 02:01:09.708 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:01:09.708 --> 02:01:11.166 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentlelady 02:01:11.166 --> 02:01:13.018 align:middle line:90% from Suffolk, senator Forry. 02:01:13.018 --> 02:01:14.834 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I wish to be recorded. 02:01:14.834 --> 02:01:15.333 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:01:15.333 --> 02:01:16.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:16.260 --> 02:01:18.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:01:18.000 --> 02:01:19.860 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:01:19.860 --> 02:01:21.180 align:middle line:90% Mr. President! 02:01:21.180 --> 02:01:24.060 align:middle line:84% This chair recognizes the gentleman 02:01:24.060 --> 02:01:25.980 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 02:01:25.980 --> 02:01:27.880 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I wish to be recorded. 02:01:27.880 --> 02:01:28.380 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:01:28.380 --> 02:01:29.177 align:middle line:90% No. 02:01:29.177 --> 02:01:30.668 align:middle line:90% No. 02:01:30.668 --> 02:01:34.147 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:01:34.147 --> 02:01:38.140 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] five in the negative. 02:01:38.140 --> 02:01:39.850 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 32 members having 02:01:39.850 --> 02:01:41.680 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, five members 02:01:41.680 --> 02:01:43.510 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:01:43.510 --> 02:01:45.670 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 02:01:45.670 --> 02:01:48.370 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor to the contrary. 02:01:48.370 --> 02:01:50.320 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:01:50.320 --> 02:01:54.640 align:middle line:84% Item 5920-3025 contained in section two aging 02:01:54.640 --> 02:01:56.580 align:middle line:84% with developmental disabilities comes 02:01:56.580 --> 02:01:58.060 align:middle line:84% from the House with the endorsement 02:01:58.060 --> 02:02:02.050 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the disapproval 02:02:02.050 --> 02:02:05.527 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 137 to 15. 02:02:05.527 --> 02:02:07.610 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 02:02:07.610 --> 02:02:10.150 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 02:02:10.150 --> 02:02:11.440 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 02:02:11.440 --> 02:02:14.365 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes the gentleman from Essex, senator Tarr. 02:02:14.365 --> 02:02:16.130 align:middle line:90% Why, thank you, Mr. President. 02:02:16.130 --> 02:02:18.520 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'm hoping we can get an explanation 02:02:18.520 --> 02:02:21.640 align:middle line:84% for this item from the very distinguished 02:02:21.640 --> 02:02:25.240 align:middle line:84% and learned gentleman from Everett. 02:02:25.240 --> 02:02:26.830 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 02:02:26.830 --> 02:02:29.350 align:middle line:90% from Middlesex and Suffolk. 02:02:29.350 --> 02:02:30.792 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:02:30.792 --> 02:02:32.250 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate the aging 02:02:32.250 --> 02:02:33.875 align:middle line:84% with developmental disabilities account 02:02:33.875 --> 02:02:36.040 align:middle line:84% under DDS funded by the conference committee 02:02:36.040 --> 02:02:37.870 align:middle line:90% at $100,000. 02:02:37.870 --> 02:02:40.570 align:middle line:84% This account supports innovative practices and programming aimed 02:02:40.570 --> 02:02:43.190 align:middle line:84% at aging individuals with developmental disabilities, 02:02:43.190 --> 02:02:44.990 align:middle line:84% including those with Alzheimer's. 02:02:44.990 --> 02:02:46.823 align:middle line:84% This money provides an important opportunity 02:02:46.823 --> 02:02:49.060 align:middle line:84% to treat evolving health needs of older 02:02:49.060 --> 02:02:52.608 align:middle line:84% citizens and any challenges that may arise and a proactive way. 02:02:52.608 --> 02:02:56.512 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 02:02:56.512 --> 02:02:58.464 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:02:58.464 --> 02:03:04.320 align:middle line:90% 02:03:04.320 --> 02:03:05.296 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:03:05.296 --> 02:03:06.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:06.290 --> 02:03:07.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:07.200 --> 02:03:08.366 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:03:08.366 --> 02:03:09.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:09.080 --> 02:03:10.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:10.100 --> 02:03:10.610 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:03:10.610 --> 02:03:11.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:11.900 --> 02:03:12.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:12.650 --> 02:03:13.550 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:03:13.550 --> 02:03:14.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:14.210 --> 02:03:16.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:16.290 --> 02:03:16.980 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:03:16.980 --> 02:03:17.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:17.480 --> 02:03:18.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:18.770 --> 02:03:19.700 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:03:19.700 --> 02:03:20.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:20.480 --> 02:03:21.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:21.740 --> 02:03:22.580 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:03:22.580 --> 02:03:23.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:23.300 --> 02:03:24.268 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:24.268 --> 02:03:25.084 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:03:25.084 --> 02:03:25.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:25.900 --> 02:03:27.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:27.140 --> 02:03:27.860 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:03:27.860 --> 02:03:29.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:29.140 --> 02:03:30.238 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:30.238 --> 02:03:31.490 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:03:31.490 --> 02:03:31.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:31.990 --> 02:03:33.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:33.280 --> 02:03:33.890 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:03:33.890 --> 02:03:35.294 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:35.294 --> 02:03:35.794 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:35.794 --> 02:03:37.222 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:03:37.222 --> 02:03:38.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:38.180 --> 02:03:39.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:39.250 --> 02:03:39.830 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:03:39.830 --> 02:03:40.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:40.640 --> 02:03:41.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:41.970 --> 02:03:42.510 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:03:42.510 --> 02:03:43.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:43.400 --> 02:03:44.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:44.700 --> 02:03:45.726 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:03:45.726 --> 02:03:46.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:46.680 --> 02:03:47.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:47.300 --> 02:03:48.331 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:03:48.331 --> 02:03:48.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:48.830 --> 02:03:50.465 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:50.465 --> 02:03:50.965 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:03:50.965 --> 02:03:52.094 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:52.094 --> 02:03:52.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:52.940 --> 02:03:53.536 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:03:53.536 --> 02:03:54.036 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:54.036 --> 02:03:55.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:55.030 --> 02:03:56.390 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:03:56.390 --> 02:03:57.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:57.220 --> 02:03:58.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:03:58.790 --> 02:03:59.603 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:03:59.603 --> 02:04:00.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:00.330 --> 02:04:01.654 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:01.654 --> 02:04:02.480 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:04:02.480 --> 02:04:02.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:02.980 --> 02:04:04.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:04.260 --> 02:04:04.820 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:04:04.820 --> 02:04:05.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:05.870 --> 02:04:06.994 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:06.994 --> 02:04:07.950 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:04:07.950 --> 02:04:08.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:08.730 --> 02:04:09.794 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:09.794 --> 02:04:10.742 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:04:10.742 --> 02:04:11.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:11.690 --> 02:04:13.112 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:13.112 --> 02:04:14.545 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:04:14.545 --> 02:04:15.315 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:15.315 --> 02:04:16.041 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:16.041 --> 02:04:16.923 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:04:16.923 --> 02:04:17.805 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:17.805 --> 02:04:19.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:19.130 --> 02:04:20.150 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:04:20.150 --> 02:04:20.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:20.650 --> 02:04:21.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:21.990 --> 02:04:22.640 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:04:22.640 --> 02:04:23.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:23.460 --> 02:04:25.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:25.010 --> 02:04:26.000 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:04:26.000 --> 02:04:26.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:26.500 --> 02:04:27.555 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:27.555 --> 02:04:28.860 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:04:28.860 --> 02:04:29.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:29.730 --> 02:04:30.638 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:30.638 --> 02:04:31.543 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:04:31.543 --> 02:04:32.042 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:32.042 --> 02:04:33.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:33.450 --> 02:04:33.980 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:04:33.980 --> 02:04:35.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:35.410 --> 02:04:36.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:36.470 --> 02:04:37.000 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:04:37.000 --> 02:04:37.974 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:37.974 --> 02:04:38.948 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:38.948 --> 02:04:41.870 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:04:41.870 --> 02:04:42.831 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:04:42.831 --> 02:04:43.331 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:43.331 --> 02:04:44.792 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:44.792 --> 02:04:46.740 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:04:46.740 --> 02:04:47.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:47.720 --> 02:04:49.684 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:49.684 --> 02:04:50.660 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:04:50.660 --> 02:04:51.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:51.160 --> 02:04:52.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:52.980 --> 02:04:53.885 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:04:53.885 --> 02:04:54.875 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:04:54.875 --> 02:04:56.360 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:04:56.360 --> 02:05:05.290 align:middle line:90% 02:05:05.290 --> 02:05:07.420 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 37 members haven't 02:05:07.420 --> 02:05:09.160 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, no members 02:05:09.160 --> 02:05:10.670 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:05:10.670 --> 02:05:12.940 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 02:05:12.940 --> 02:05:16.870 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor to the contrary. 02:05:16.870 --> 02:05:18.490 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 02:05:18.490 --> 02:05:19.650 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 02:05:19.650 --> 02:05:22.210 align:middle line:84% Why thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 02:05:22.210 --> 02:05:26.740 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I move that the Senate reconsider the action 02:05:26.740 --> 02:05:31.870 align:middle line:84% that it took on item number 2511-0100 entitled 02:05:31.870 --> 02:05:34.920 align:middle line:90% DAR administration. 02:05:34.920 --> 02:05:37.120 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex moves reconsideration. 02:05:37.120 --> 02:05:40.450 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objections? 02:05:40.450 --> 02:05:41.440 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:05:41.440 --> 02:05:45.382 align:middle line:90% The item is reconsidered. 02:05:45.382 --> 02:05:46.843 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:05:46.843 --> 02:05:59.030 align:middle line:90% 02:05:59.030 --> 02:05:59.810 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:05:59.810 --> 02:06:00.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:00.750 --> 02:06:01.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:01.760 --> 02:06:02.650 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:06:02.650 --> 02:06:03.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:03.510 --> 02:06:04.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:04.520 --> 02:06:05.383 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:06:05.383 --> 02:06:06.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:06.090 --> 02:06:07.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:07.560 --> 02:06:08.460 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:06:08.460 --> 02:06:09.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:09.310 --> 02:06:10.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:10.480 --> 02:06:11.323 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:06:11.323 --> 02:06:11.822 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:11.822 --> 02:06:13.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:13.190 --> 02:06:14.102 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:06:14.102 --> 02:06:15.020 align:middle line:90% No. 02:06:15.020 --> 02:06:16.100 align:middle line:90% No. 02:06:16.100 --> 02:06:16.610 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:06:16.610 --> 02:06:17.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:17.420 --> 02:06:18.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:18.410 --> 02:06:19.254 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:06:19.254 --> 02:06:20.222 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:20.222 --> 02:06:21.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:21.190 --> 02:06:22.158 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:06:22.158 --> 02:06:25.046 align:middle line:90% 02:06:25.046 --> 02:06:25.546 align:middle line:90% Yes? 02:06:25.546 --> 02:06:26.046 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:26.046 --> 02:06:28.934 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:28.934 --> 02:06:31.370 align:middle line:90% deMacedo votes yes. 02:06:31.370 --> 02:06:32.340 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:06:32.340 --> 02:06:32.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:32.840 --> 02:06:34.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:34.100 --> 02:06:34.920 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:06:34.920 --> 02:06:35.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:35.420 --> 02:06:37.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:37.270 --> 02:06:37.930 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:06:37.930 --> 02:06:38.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:38.430 --> 02:06:39.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:39.500 --> 02:06:40.440 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:06:40.440 --> 02:06:40.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:40.940 --> 02:06:41.988 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:41.988 --> 02:06:42.944 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:06:42.944 --> 02:06:43.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:43.900 --> 02:06:44.856 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:44.856 --> 02:06:45.790 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:06:45.790 --> 02:06:46.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:46.290 --> 02:06:47.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:47.640 --> 02:06:48.277 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:06:48.277 --> 02:06:49.071 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:49.071 --> 02:06:50.405 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:50.405 --> 02:06:51.210 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:06:51.210 --> 02:06:51.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:51.710 --> 02:06:52.782 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:52.782 --> 02:06:53.641 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:06:53.641 --> 02:06:54.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:54.140 --> 02:06:55.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:55.420 --> 02:06:57.402 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:06:57.402 --> 02:06:58.878 align:middle line:90% Senator Jehlen? 02:06:58.878 --> 02:06:59.378 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:06:59.378 --> 02:07:01.848 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:01.848 --> 02:07:03.330 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:07:03.330 --> 02:07:03.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:03.830 --> 02:07:04.912 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:04.912 --> 02:07:05.896 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:07:05.896 --> 02:07:06.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:06.880 --> 02:07:07.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:07.870 --> 02:07:08.870 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:07:08.870 --> 02:07:09.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:09.750 --> 02:07:10.742 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:10.742 --> 02:07:11.421 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:07:11.421 --> 02:07:11.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:11.920 --> 02:07:13.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:13.530 --> 02:07:14.460 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:07:14.460 --> 02:07:15.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:15.240 --> 02:07:16.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:16.390 --> 02:07:17.343 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:07:17.343 --> 02:07:18.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:18.270 --> 02:07:19.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:19.070 --> 02:07:20.070 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:07:20.070 --> 02:07:21.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:21.070 --> 02:07:22.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:22.070 --> 02:07:23.070 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:07:23.070 --> 02:07:24.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:24.070 --> 02:07:25.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:25.570 --> 02:07:26.581 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:07:26.581 --> 02:07:27.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:27.080 --> 02:07:28.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:28.210 --> 02:07:29.251 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:07:29.251 --> 02:07:29.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:29.750 --> 02:07:31.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:31.680 --> 02:07:32.487 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:07:32.487 --> 02:07:32.986 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:32.986 --> 02:07:33.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:33.880 --> 02:07:35.240 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:07:35.240 --> 02:07:35.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:35.930 --> 02:07:37.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:37.170 --> 02:07:37.670 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:07:37.670 --> 02:07:39.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:39.210 --> 02:07:40.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:40.130 --> 02:07:40.630 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:07:40.630 --> 02:07:41.586 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:41.586 --> 02:07:42.542 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:42.542 --> 02:07:45.410 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:07:45.410 --> 02:07:46.366 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:46.366 --> 02:07:48.278 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:48.278 --> 02:07:50.190 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:07:50.190 --> 02:07:51.150 align:middle line:90% No. 02:07:51.150 --> 02:07:53.069 align:middle line:90% No. 02:07:53.069 --> 02:07:54.055 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:07:54.055 --> 02:07:55.041 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:55.041 --> 02:07:56.027 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:56.027 --> 02:07:57.010 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:07:57.010 --> 02:07:57.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:57.510 --> 02:07:58.952 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:07:58.952 --> 02:08:03.416 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:08:03.416 --> 02:08:04.904 align:middle line:90% Have all members-- yes? 02:08:04.904 --> 02:08:11.870 align:middle line:90% 02:08:11.870 --> 02:08:13.730 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 35 members having 02:08:13.730 --> 02:08:15.650 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, two members 02:08:15.650 --> 02:08:17.280 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:08:17.280 --> 02:08:20.120 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 02:08:20.120 --> 02:08:22.360 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 02:08:22.360 --> 02:08:24.694 align:middle line:90% Senator Tarr. 02:08:24.694 --> 02:08:29.260 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 02:08:29.260 --> 02:08:31.000 align:middle line:90% Why thank you, Mr. President. 02:08:31.000 --> 02:08:34.750 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I move also that the Senate reconsider 02:08:34.750 --> 02:08:41.110 align:middle line:84% the action that was taken on item 2800-0700, 02:08:41.110 --> 02:08:45.030 align:middle line:84% involving the office of dam safety. 02:08:45.030 --> 02:08:47.950 align:middle line:84% The gentleman from Essex moves reconsideration. 02:08:47.950 --> 02:08:49.670 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 02:08:49.670 --> 02:08:51.222 align:middle line:90% The chair hears none. 02:08:51.222 --> 02:08:52.710 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:08:52.710 --> 02:09:04.614 align:middle line:90% 02:09:04.614 --> 02:09:05.606 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:09:05.606 --> 02:09:06.598 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:06.598 --> 02:09:09.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:09.080 --> 02:09:10.220 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:09:10.220 --> 02:09:10.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:10.720 --> 02:09:11.816 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:11.816 --> 02:09:12.316 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:09:12.316 --> 02:09:12.816 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:12.816 --> 02:09:14.781 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:14.781 --> 02:09:15.760 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:09:15.760 --> 02:09:16.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:16.260 --> 02:09:16.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:16.760 --> 02:09:23.162 align:middle line:90% 02:09:23.162 --> 02:09:24.148 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:09:24.148 --> 02:09:27.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:27.120 --> 02:09:27.840 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:09:27.840 --> 02:09:28.430 align:middle line:90% No. 02:09:28.430 --> 02:09:31.375 align:middle line:90% No. 02:09:31.375 --> 02:09:32.860 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:09:32.860 --> 02:09:34.840 align:middle line:90% Senator Creem? 02:09:34.840 --> 02:09:35.830 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:09:35.830 --> 02:09:36.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:36.830 --> 02:09:38.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:38.670 --> 02:09:40.041 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:09:40.041 --> 02:09:40.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:40.800 --> 02:09:42.008 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:42.008 --> 02:09:44.912 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:09:44.912 --> 02:09:46.348 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:09:46.348 --> 02:09:46.848 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:46.848 --> 02:09:48.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:48.300 --> 02:09:49.870 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:09:49.870 --> 02:09:50.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:50.370 --> 02:09:51.429 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:51.429 --> 02:09:52.347 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:09:52.347 --> 02:09:53.265 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:53.265 --> 02:09:54.183 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:54.183 --> 02:09:55.101 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:09:55.101 --> 02:09:56.020 align:middle line:90% No. 02:09:56.020 --> 02:09:57.980 align:middle line:90% No. 02:09:57.980 --> 02:09:58.600 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:09:58.600 --> 02:09:59.099 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:09:59.099 --> 02:10:00.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:00.370 --> 02:10:00.931 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:10:00.931 --> 02:10:01.431 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:10:01.431 --> 02:10:02.874 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:02.874 --> 02:10:03.820 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:10:03.820 --> 02:10:04.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:04.320 --> 02:10:05.514 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:05.514 --> 02:10:06.014 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:10:06.014 --> 02:10:06.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:06.850 --> 02:10:08.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:08.070 --> 02:10:08.570 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:10:08.570 --> 02:10:09.460 align:middle line:90% No. 02:10:09.460 --> 02:10:11.323 align:middle line:90% No. 02:10:11.323 --> 02:10:12.285 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:10:12.285 --> 02:10:13.728 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:13.728 --> 02:10:14.505 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:10:14.505 --> 02:10:16.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:16.230 --> 02:10:16.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:16.980 --> 02:10:18.030 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:10:18.030 --> 02:10:18.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:18.530 --> 02:10:20.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:20.070 --> 02:10:20.760 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:10:20.760 --> 02:10:21.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:21.260 --> 02:10:22.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:22.510 --> 02:10:23.420 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:10:23.420 --> 02:10:23.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:23.920 --> 02:10:24.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:24.900 --> 02:10:25.660 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:10:25.660 --> 02:10:26.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:26.680 --> 02:10:27.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:27.720 --> 02:10:28.876 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:10:28.876 --> 02:10:29.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:29.550 --> 02:10:30.608 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:30.608 --> 02:10:31.572 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:10:31.572 --> 02:10:32.072 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:32.072 --> 02:10:33.048 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:33.048 --> 02:10:34.512 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:10:34.512 --> 02:10:35.488 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:35.488 --> 02:10:36.464 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:36.464 --> 02:10:37.440 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:10:37.440 --> 02:10:38.420 align:middle line:90% No. 02:10:38.420 --> 02:10:39.610 align:middle line:90% No. 02:10:39.610 --> 02:10:40.250 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:10:40.250 --> 02:10:41.021 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:41.021 --> 02:10:42.404 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:42.404 --> 02:10:43.787 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:10:43.787 --> 02:10:44.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:44.710 --> 02:10:45.725 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:45.725 --> 02:10:46.675 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:10:46.675 --> 02:10:47.625 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:47.625 --> 02:10:48.575 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:48.575 --> 02:10:49.525 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:10:49.525 --> 02:10:50.475 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:50.475 --> 02:10:52.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:52.380 --> 02:10:53.180 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:10:53.180 --> 02:10:54.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:54.120 --> 02:10:55.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:55.060 --> 02:10:55.970 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:10:55.970 --> 02:10:56.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:56.470 --> 02:10:58.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:10:58.360 --> 02:10:58.950 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:10:58.950 --> 02:10:59.970 align:middle line:90% No. 02:10:59.970 --> 02:11:01.590 align:middle line:90% No. 02:11:01.590 --> 02:11:02.890 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:11:02.890 --> 02:11:03.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:11:03.720 --> 02:11:04.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:11:04.680 --> 02:11:05.570 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:11:05.570 --> 02:11:06.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:11:06.070 --> 02:11:08.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:11:08.860 --> 02:11:12.100 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:11:12.100 --> 02:11:14.020 align:middle line:84% The senator from Plymouth, senator deMacedo. 02:11:14.020 --> 02:11:19.320 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I'd like to be recorded in the negative. 02:11:19.320 --> 02:11:21.572 align:middle line:90% deMacedo votes no. 02:11:21.572 --> 02:11:23.516 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:11:23.516 --> 02:11:32.760 align:middle line:90% 02:11:32.760 --> 02:11:35.530 align:middle line:84% 31 members having voted in the affirmative, six members 02:11:35.530 --> 02:11:37.190 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:11:37.190 --> 02:11:39.550 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections 02:11:39.550 --> 02:11:42.850 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor to the contrary. 02:11:42.850 --> 02:11:44.815 align:middle line:84% The gentleman from Essex, senator Tarr. 02:11:44.815 --> 02:11:47.188 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I move the Senate be in a brief recess. 02:11:47.188 --> 02:11:49.164 align:middle line:84% The Senate shall be in a brief recess. 02:11:49.164 --> 02:12:03.020 align:middle line:90% 02:12:03.020 --> 02:12:05.410 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:12:05.410 --> 02:12:09.850 align:middle line:84% Item 7000-9402, the talking book library in Worcester containing 02:12:09.850 --> 02:12:12.370 align:middle line:84% section two comes from the House with the endorsement 02:12:12.370 --> 02:12:14.935 align:middle line:84% that this item passed notwithstanding the reduction 02:12:14.935 --> 02:12:16.810 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor 02:12:16.810 --> 02:12:19.737 align:middle line:90% by a vote of 132 to 23. 02:12:19.737 --> 02:12:21.820 align:middle line:84% The question before the Senate is, shall this item 02:12:21.820 --> 02:12:24.730 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of the governor 02:12:24.730 --> 02:12:26.260 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 02:12:26.260 --> 02:12:30.306 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman from Essex, Mr. Tarr. 02:12:30.306 --> 02:12:32.680 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 02:12:32.680 --> 02:12:36.850 align:middle line:84% Mr. President, I know that the distinguished second half 02:12:36.850 --> 02:12:38.620 align:middle line:84% of the dynamic duo was just consulted 02:12:38.620 --> 02:12:40.536 align:middle line:84% by the gentleman from the Cape and the Islands 02:12:40.536 --> 02:12:43.900 align:middle line:84% who came in from the bench with some additional information 02:12:43.900 --> 02:12:45.310 align:middle line:84% and I'm hoping that he will share 02:12:45.310 --> 02:12:49.120 align:middle line:84% that additional information with us about the talking 02:12:49.120 --> 02:12:51.547 align:middle line:84% information center, or the talking book center. 02:12:51.547 --> 02:12:54.130 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping we can get a better explanation of what's happening 02:12:54.130 --> 02:12:55.460 align:middle line:90% with this particular item. 02:12:55.460 --> 02:12:57.580 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:12:57.580 --> 02:13:02.050 align:middle line:84% The gentleman from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 02:13:02.050 --> 02:13:04.090 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:13:04.090 --> 02:13:06.886 align:middle line:84% This veto would eliminate one earmark totaling $50,000 02:13:06.886 --> 02:13:09.010 align:middle line:84% to support the continued operation of the Worcester 02:13:09.010 --> 02:13:10.840 align:middle line:90% mobile library branch. 02:13:10.840 --> 02:13:15.030 align:middle line:84% Libby and Lilly, the two members of this public library fleet, 02:13:15.030 --> 02:13:17.260 align:middle line:84% have been sharing books and DVDs, learning materials, 02:13:17.260 --> 02:13:20.980 align:middle line:84% and services in the community since 2012 and 2014 02:13:20.980 --> 02:13:22.450 align:middle line:90% respectively. 02:13:22.450 --> 02:13:25.330 align:middle line:84% I, as well as the gentleman from the Cape and the Islands, 02:13:25.330 --> 02:13:27.400 align:middle line:84% and the members of the Worcester delegation, 02:13:27.400 --> 02:13:30.522 align:middle line:84% hope to see Lilly's bright library express sign winding 02:13:30.522 --> 02:13:32.230 align:middle line:84% through the streets of Worcester some day 02:13:32.230 --> 02:13:34.249 align:middle line:90% soon and long into the future. 02:13:34.249 --> 02:13:36.040 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask that you overturn this veto. 02:13:36.040 --> 02:13:38.950 align:middle line:90% 02:13:38.950 --> 02:13:40.405 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:13:40.405 --> 02:13:46.710 align:middle line:90% 02:13:46.710 --> 02:13:48.165 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:13:48.165 --> 02:13:49.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:49.150 --> 02:13:51.634 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:51.634 --> 02:13:52.606 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:13:52.606 --> 02:13:54.064 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:54.064 --> 02:13:55.522 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:13:55.522 --> 02:13:56.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:56.340 --> 02:13:57.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:57.160 --> 02:13:57.870 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:13:57.870 --> 02:13:58.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:58.370 --> 02:13:59.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:13:59.280 --> 02:13:59.780 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:13:59.780 --> 02:14:02.570 align:middle line:90% 02:14:02.570 --> 02:14:03.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:03.070 --> 02:14:05.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:05.420 --> 02:14:06.290 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:14:06.290 --> 02:14:06.930 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:06.930 --> 02:14:08.220 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:08.220 --> 02:14:09.060 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:14:09.060 --> 02:14:09.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:09.560 --> 02:14:11.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:11.020 --> 02:14:11.620 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:14:11.620 --> 02:14:12.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:12.420 --> 02:14:12.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:12.940 --> 02:14:13.884 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:14:13.884 --> 02:14:14.828 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:14.828 --> 02:14:15.772 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:15.772 --> 02:14:19.048 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:14:19.048 --> 02:14:19.548 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:14:19.548 --> 02:14:20.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:20.970 --> 02:14:22.156 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:22.156 --> 02:14:23.061 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:14:23.061 --> 02:14:23.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:23.560 --> 02:14:24.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:24.580 --> 02:14:25.480 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:14:25.480 --> 02:14:26.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:26.380 --> 02:14:27.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:27.730 --> 02:14:28.540 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:14:28.540 --> 02:14:29.040 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:29.040 --> 02:14:30.240 align:middle line:90% No. 02:14:30.240 --> 02:14:30.740 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:14:30.740 --> 02:14:31.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:31.600 --> 02:14:32.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:32.880 --> 02:14:33.853 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:14:33.853 --> 02:14:34.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:34.660 --> 02:14:36.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:36.510 --> 02:14:37.253 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:14:37.253 --> 02:14:38.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:38.240 --> 02:14:39.172 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:39.172 --> 02:14:40.320 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:14:40.320 --> 02:14:40.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:40.920 --> 02:14:41.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:41.860 --> 02:14:43.740 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:14:43.740 --> 02:14:45.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:45.330 --> 02:14:47.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:47.570 --> 02:14:48.401 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:14:48.401 --> 02:14:48.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:48.900 --> 02:14:50.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:50.130 --> 02:14:50.670 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:14:50.670 --> 02:14:51.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:51.560 --> 02:14:52.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:52.880 --> 02:14:53.720 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:14:53.720 --> 02:14:54.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:54.220 --> 02:14:55.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:55.560 --> 02:14:56.130 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:14:56.130 --> 02:14:57.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:57.510 --> 02:14:59.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:14:59.030 --> 02:14:59.570 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:14:59.570 --> 02:15:00.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:00.260 --> 02:15:01.316 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:01.316 --> 02:15:03.004 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:15:03.004 --> 02:15:03.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:03.780 --> 02:15:04.796 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:04.796 --> 02:15:05.690 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:15:05.690 --> 02:15:06.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:06.600 --> 02:15:07.661 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:07.661 --> 02:15:08.583 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:15:08.583 --> 02:15:09.966 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:09.966 --> 02:15:10.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:10.890 --> 02:15:11.950 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:15:11.950 --> 02:15:12.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:12.450 --> 02:15:13.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:13.510 --> 02:15:14.980 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:15:14.980 --> 02:15:17.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:17.430 --> 02:15:18.430 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:15:18.430 --> 02:15:19.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:19.380 --> 02:15:20.936 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:20.936 --> 02:15:22.350 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:15:22.350 --> 02:15:22.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:22.850 --> 02:15:23.965 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:23.965 --> 02:15:24.935 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:15:24.935 --> 02:15:25.905 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:25.905 --> 02:15:26.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:26.880 --> 02:15:28.003 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:15:28.003 --> 02:15:29.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:29.190 --> 02:15:30.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:30.320 --> 02:15:31.181 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:15:31.181 --> 02:15:31.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:31.680 --> 02:15:33.463 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:33.463 --> 02:15:34.345 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:15:34.345 --> 02:15:35.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:35.230 --> 02:15:36.116 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:36.116 --> 02:15:37.108 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:15:37.108 --> 02:15:38.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:38.100 --> 02:15:39.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:39.360 --> 02:15:39.970 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:15:39.970 --> 02:15:40.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:40.710 --> 02:15:41.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:41.940 --> 02:15:42.696 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:15:42.696 --> 02:15:43.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:43.410 --> 02:15:45.429 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:45.429 --> 02:15:46.415 align:middle line:90% 34 to three. 02:15:46.415 --> 02:15:47.887 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:15:47.887 --> 02:15:48.387 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:15:48.387 --> 02:16:01.210 align:middle line:90% 02:16:01.210 --> 02:16:03.020 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 34 members having 02:16:03.020 --> 02:16:04.670 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, three members 02:16:04.670 --> 02:16:06.600 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:16:06.600 --> 02:16:09.750 align:middle line:84% The item passes notwithstanding the objections of the governor 02:16:09.750 --> 02:16:10.750 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 02:16:10.750 --> 02:16:13.750 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:16:13.750 --> 02:16:21.990 align:middle line:84% [AUDIO OUT] the governor to the House which has passed it 02:16:21.990 --> 02:16:24.640 align:middle line:84% notwithstanding the disapproval of the governor 02:16:24.640 --> 02:16:26.640 align:middle line:90% by a vote of 132 to 22. 02:16:26.640 --> 02:16:31.916 align:middle line:90% 02:16:31.916 --> 02:16:34.370 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 02:16:34.370 --> 02:16:35.799 align:middle line:90% from Essex, senator Tarr. 02:16:35.799 --> 02:16:38.340 align:middle line:84% Why thank you, Mr. President, and through you to the members. 02:16:38.340 --> 02:16:40.520 align:middle line:84% I'm hoping that we can get an explanation 02:16:40.520 --> 02:16:42.980 align:middle line:84% of this particular item, and if we're 02:16:42.980 --> 02:16:46.070 align:middle line:84% being asked to override the governor's action here, 02:16:46.070 --> 02:16:48.235 align:middle line:84% the reason that we're being asked to do so. 02:16:48.235 --> 02:16:50.215 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:16:50.215 --> 02:17:07.059 align:middle line:90% 02:17:07.059 --> 02:17:08.799 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes the gentleman 02:17:08.799 --> 02:17:11.379 align:middle line:84% from Middlesex and Suffolk, senator DiDomenico. 02:17:11.379 --> 02:17:13.150 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. President. 02:17:13.150 --> 02:17:15.760 align:middle line:84% This veto would fully eliminate $200,000 in funding 02:17:15.760 --> 02:17:17.409 align:middle line:90% for the Center for the Book. 02:17:17.409 --> 02:17:19.700 align:middle line:84% The Center for the Book is a public private partnership 02:17:19.700 --> 02:17:21.074 align:middle line:84% set up to the Library of Congress 02:17:21.074 --> 02:17:23.440 align:middle line:84% to develop and promote cultural programs 02:17:23.440 --> 02:17:25.990 align:middle line:84% around our shared literary history. 02:17:25.990 --> 02:17:29.327 align:middle line:84% By overriding this veto and reinstating $200,000 in funding 02:17:29.327 --> 02:17:31.660 align:middle line:84% we can continue to support literacy, cultural awareness, 02:17:31.660 --> 02:17:34.229 align:middle line:90% and our history in this state. 02:17:34.229 --> 02:17:38.720 align:middle line:84% Therefor I ask for you to overturn this veto. 02:17:38.720 --> 02:17:41.215 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:17:41.215 --> 02:17:42.712 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:17:42.712 --> 02:17:43.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:43.710 --> 02:17:45.207 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:45.207 --> 02:17:46.704 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:17:46.704 --> 02:17:47.702 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:47.702 --> 02:17:48.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:48.700 --> 02:17:49.698 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:17:49.698 --> 02:17:51.195 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:51.195 --> 02:17:52.193 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:17:52.193 --> 02:17:54.189 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:54.189 --> 02:17:55.187 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:17:55.187 --> 02:17:56.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:56.200 --> 02:17:57.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:57.320 --> 02:17:58.090 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:17:58.090 --> 02:17:59.034 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:59.034 --> 02:17:59.978 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:17:59.978 --> 02:18:02.338 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:18:02.338 --> 02:18:03.282 align:middle line:90% Senator Creem? 02:18:03.282 --> 02:18:05.170 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:18:05.170 --> 02:18:06.610 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:18:06.610 --> 02:18:08.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:08.260 --> 02:18:08.760 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:18:08.760 --> 02:18:09.703 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:09.703 --> 02:18:10.629 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:10.629 --> 02:18:11.660 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:18:11.660 --> 02:18:12.570 align:middle line:90% No. 02:18:12.570 --> 02:18:13.789 align:middle line:90% No. 02:18:13.789 --> 02:18:15.940 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:18:15.940 --> 02:18:18.730 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:18:18.730 --> 02:18:19.642 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:19.642 --> 02:18:21.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:21.010 --> 02:18:22.222 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:18:22.222 --> 02:18:23.186 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:23.186 --> 02:18:24.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:24.150 --> 02:18:25.096 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:18:25.096 --> 02:18:25.596 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:25.596 --> 02:18:27.049 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:27.049 --> 02:18:27.570 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:18:27.570 --> 02:18:28.790 align:middle line:90% No. 02:18:28.790 --> 02:18:29.690 align:middle line:90% No. 02:18:29.690 --> 02:18:30.846 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:18:30.846 --> 02:18:31.639 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:31.639 --> 02:18:32.809 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:32.809 --> 02:18:33.732 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:18:33.732 --> 02:18:34.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:34.580 --> 02:18:35.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:35.650 --> 02:18:36.542 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:18:36.542 --> 02:18:37.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:37.510 --> 02:18:38.469 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:38.469 --> 02:18:39.006 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:18:39.006 --> 02:18:39.505 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:39.505 --> 02:18:40.873 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:40.873 --> 02:18:41.785 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:18:41.785 --> 02:18:42.697 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:42.697 --> 02:18:44.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:44.070 --> 02:18:45.033 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:18:45.033 --> 02:18:45.959 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:45.959 --> 02:18:47.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:47.070 --> 02:18:47.830 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:18:47.830 --> 02:18:48.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:48.510 --> 02:18:49.923 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:49.923 --> 02:18:50.423 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:18:50.423 --> 02:18:51.365 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:51.365 --> 02:18:52.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:52.780 --> 02:18:53.750 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:18:53.750 --> 02:18:54.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:54.250 --> 02:18:55.309 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:55.309 --> 02:18:55.910 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:18:55.910 --> 02:18:57.549 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:57.549 --> 02:18:58.657 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:18:58.657 --> 02:18:59.156 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:18:59.156 --> 02:19:00.062 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:00.062 --> 02:19:00.968 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:00.968 --> 02:19:02.269 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:19:02.269 --> 02:19:03.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:03.440 --> 02:19:04.876 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:04.876 --> 02:19:06.223 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:19:06.223 --> 02:19:08.051 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:08.051 --> 02:19:08.931 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:19:08.931 --> 02:19:09.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:09.430 --> 02:19:11.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:11.020 --> 02:19:12.149 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:19:12.149 --> 02:19:13.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:13.030 --> 02:19:14.216 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:14.216 --> 02:19:14.799 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:19:14.799 --> 02:19:15.889 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:15.889 --> 02:19:17.345 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:17.345 --> 02:19:18.231 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:19:18.231 --> 02:19:19.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:19.120 --> 02:19:20.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:20.160 --> 02:19:20.840 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:19:20.840 --> 02:19:21.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:21.620 --> 02:19:22.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:22.980 --> 02:19:23.580 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:19:23.580 --> 02:19:24.719 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:24.719 --> 02:19:25.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:25.840 --> 02:19:26.682 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:19:26.682 --> 02:19:27.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:27.610 --> 02:19:28.634 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:28.634 --> 02:19:29.602 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:19:29.602 --> 02:19:32.022 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:32.022 --> 02:19:33.469 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:19:33.469 --> 02:19:33.969 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:33.969 --> 02:19:34.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:34.990 --> 02:19:36.260 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:19:36.260 --> 02:19:36.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:36.760 --> 02:19:38.283 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:38.283 --> 02:19:39.267 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:19:39.267 --> 02:19:40.251 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:40.251 --> 02:19:41.727 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:41.727 --> 02:19:43.195 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:19:43.195 --> 02:19:43.695 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:19:43.695 --> 02:19:51.580 align:middle line:90% 02:19:51.580 --> 02:19:53.320 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 35 members having 02:19:53.320 --> 02:19:55.090 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, two members 02:19:55.090 --> 02:19:57.056 align:middle line:90% having voted in the negative. 02:19:57.056 --> 02:19:59.680 align:middle line:84% The item passes, notwithstanding the objections of the governor 02:19:59.680 --> 02:20:00.816 align:middle line:90% to the contrary. 02:20:00.816 --> 02:20:03.196 align:middle line:84% Senate will be in a brief recess. 02:20:03.196 --> 02:20:07.960 align:middle line:90% [AUDIO OUT] 02:20:07.960 --> 02:20:10.650 align:middle line:90% --chair would ask all members-- 02:20:10.650 --> 02:20:15.900 align:middle line:84% all members to take their seats and remain in their seats. 02:20:15.900 --> 02:20:21.350 align:middle line:84% We're going to do the final 10 rather quickly. 02:20:21.350 --> 02:20:28.210 align:middle line:90% 02:20:28.210 --> 02:20:31.640 align:middle line:90% All members take your seats. 02:20:31.640 --> 02:20:34.580 align:middle line:84% We're just going to call it, and call it. 02:20:34.580 --> 02:20:35.550 align:middle line:90% OK? 02:20:35.550 --> 02:20:36.050 align:middle line:90% Yep. 02:20:36.050 --> 02:20:39.990 align:middle line:90% 02:20:39.990 --> 02:20:43.780 align:middle line:84% Colleagues, as our colleagues enter the room, 02:20:43.780 --> 02:20:46.370 align:middle line:84% court officers please ask them to take a seat. 02:20:46.370 --> 02:20:48.290 align:middle line:84% Colleagues, if you're talking with them, 02:20:48.290 --> 02:20:51.840 align:middle line:90% get them to sit right down. 02:20:51.840 --> 02:20:53.150 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:20:53.150 --> 02:20:57.400 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-0010 contained in section two 02:20:57.400 --> 02:20:59.740 align:middle line:84% relative to the executive office of economic development 02:20:59.740 --> 02:21:00.930 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 02:21:00.930 --> 02:21:03.120 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed not withstanding 02:21:03.120 --> 02:21:05.310 align:middle line:84% the reduction and objections of his excellency 02:21:05.310 --> 02:21:07.151 align:middle line:90% the governor 122 to 32. 02:21:07.151 --> 02:21:09.150 align:middle line:84% Question before the Senate is, shall this matter 02:21:09.150 --> 02:21:11.358 align:middle line:84% pass notwithstanding the objections of his excellency 02:21:11.358 --> 02:21:14.130 align:middle line:90% the governor to the contrary. 02:21:14.130 --> 02:21:15.760 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:21:15.760 --> 02:21:19.930 align:middle line:90% 02:21:19.930 --> 02:21:20.850 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:21:20.850 --> 02:21:21.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:21.850 --> 02:21:22.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:22.830 --> 02:21:23.550 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:21:23.550 --> 02:21:24.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:24.050 --> 02:21:25.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:25.050 --> 02:21:26.440 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:21:26.440 --> 02:21:27.456 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:27.456 --> 02:21:28.165 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:21:28.165 --> 02:21:28.665 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:28.665 --> 02:21:29.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:29.340 --> 02:21:29.920 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:21:29.920 --> 02:21:30.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:30.620 --> 02:21:31.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:31.560 --> 02:21:32.370 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:21:32.370 --> 02:21:33.030 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:33.030 --> 02:21:33.920 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:33.920 --> 02:21:34.420 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:21:34.420 --> 02:21:35.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:35.030 --> 02:21:35.741 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:35.741 --> 02:21:36.240 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:21:36.240 --> 02:21:37.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:37.160 --> 02:21:38.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:38.270 --> 02:21:38.880 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:21:38.880 --> 02:21:39.870 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:39.870 --> 02:21:40.910 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:40.910 --> 02:21:41.560 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:21:41.560 --> 02:21:42.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:42.660 --> 02:21:43.812 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:43.812 --> 02:21:44.631 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:21:44.631 --> 02:21:45.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:45.130 --> 02:21:46.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:46.020 --> 02:21:46.580 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:21:46.580 --> 02:21:47.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:47.390 --> 02:21:48.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:48.400 --> 02:21:48.900 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:21:48.900 --> 02:21:49.710 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:49.710 --> 02:21:50.950 align:middle line:90% No. 02:21:50.950 --> 02:21:51.800 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:21:51.800 --> 02:21:52.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:52.620 --> 02:21:53.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:53.340 --> 02:21:53.860 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:21:53.860 --> 02:21:54.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:54.360 --> 02:21:55.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:55.510 --> 02:21:56.010 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:21:56.010 --> 02:21:57.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:57.000 --> 02:21:57.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:57.600 --> 02:21:58.514 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:21:58.514 --> 02:21:59.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:21:59.430 --> 02:22:00.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:00.540 --> 02:22:01.480 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:22:01.480 --> 02:22:01.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:01.980 --> 02:22:02.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:02.980 --> 02:22:03.706 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:22:03.706 --> 02:22:04.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:04.420 --> 02:22:05.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:05.460 --> 02:22:06.290 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:22:06.290 --> 02:22:07.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:07.050 --> 02:22:07.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:07.610 --> 02:22:08.454 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:22:08.454 --> 02:22:09.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:09.720 --> 02:22:10.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:10.560 --> 02:22:11.100 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:22:11.100 --> 02:22:12.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:12.240 --> 02:22:12.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:12.990 --> 02:22:13.490 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:22:13.490 --> 02:22:13.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:13.990 --> 02:22:14.843 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:14.843 --> 02:22:15.670 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:22:15.670 --> 02:22:16.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:16.720 --> 02:22:17.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:17.320 --> 02:22:18.192 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:22:18.192 --> 02:22:19.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:19.680 --> 02:22:20.711 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:20.711 --> 02:22:21.210 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:22:21.210 --> 02:22:22.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:22.170 --> 02:22:23.141 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:23.141 --> 02:22:23.640 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:22:23.640 --> 02:22:24.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:24.570 --> 02:22:25.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:25.410 --> 02:22:26.010 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:22:26.010 --> 02:22:27.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:27.170 --> 02:22:27.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:27.990 --> 02:22:28.910 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:22:28.910 --> 02:22:29.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:29.760 --> 02:22:30.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:30.540 --> 02:22:32.130 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:22:32.130 --> 02:22:33.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:33.000 --> 02:22:33.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:33.960 --> 02:22:34.620 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:22:34.620 --> 02:22:35.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:35.580 --> 02:22:36.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:36.890 --> 02:22:37.490 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:22:37.490 --> 02:22:38.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:38.590 --> 02:22:39.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:39.190 --> 02:22:40.100 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:22:40.100 --> 02:22:41.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:41.010 --> 02:22:41.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:41.520 --> 02:22:42.468 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:22:42.468 --> 02:22:43.416 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:43.416 --> 02:22:44.355 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:44.355 --> 02:22:45.251 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:22:45.251 --> 02:22:45.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:45.750 --> 02:22:46.486 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:46.486 --> 02:22:47.980 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:22:47.980 --> 02:22:48.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:48.780 --> 02:22:49.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:49.780 --> 02:22:50.280 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:22:50.280 --> 02:22:50.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:50.780 --> 02:22:51.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:22:51.750 --> 02:22:55.670 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:22:55.670 --> 02:22:57.580 align:middle line:84% 34 in the affirmative, three in the negative. 02:22:57.580 --> 02:23:02.270 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 34 having voted in the affirmative, 02:23:02.270 --> 02:23:03.800 align:middle line:90% three in the negative. 02:23:03.800 --> 02:23:05.800 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the governor's 02:23:05.800 --> 02:23:07.720 align:middle line:90% objection. 02:23:07.720 --> 02:23:08.860 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:23:08.860 --> 02:23:12.690 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-0012 contained in section two, 02:23:12.690 --> 02:23:15.329 align:middle line:84% youth at risk summer jobs comes from House with the endorsement 02:23:15.329 --> 02:23:17.620 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 02:23:17.620 --> 02:23:20.792 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor 121 to 32. 02:23:20.792 --> 02:23:22.244 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:23:22.244 --> 02:23:25.132 align:middle line:90% 02:23:25.132 --> 02:23:25.632 align:middle line:90% 5:21. 02:23:25.632 --> 02:23:30.480 align:middle line:90% 02:23:30.480 --> 02:23:31.480 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:23:31.480 --> 02:23:32.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:32.740 --> 02:23:33.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:33.660 --> 02:23:34.470 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:23:34.470 --> 02:23:34.970 align:middle line:90% Yes 02:23:34.970 --> 02:23:35.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:35.960 --> 02:23:36.500 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:23:36.500 --> 02:23:37.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:37.320 --> 02:23:38.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:38.570 --> 02:23:39.341 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:23:39.341 --> 02:23:39.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:39.840 --> 02:23:40.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:40.730 --> 02:23:41.290 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:23:41.290 --> 02:23:42.210 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:42.210 --> 02:23:43.880 align:middle line:90% Yes Chang-Diaz? 02:23:43.880 --> 02:23:44.540 align:middle line:90% No. 02:23:44.540 --> 02:23:45.417 align:middle line:90% No. 02:23:45.417 --> 02:23:46.200 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:23:46.200 --> 02:23:46.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:46.700 --> 02:23:47.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:47.660 --> 02:23:48.370 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:23:48.370 --> 02:23:48.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:48.870 --> 02:23:49.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:49.920 --> 02:23:50.690 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:23:50.690 --> 02:23:51.280 align:middle line:90% No. 02:23:51.280 --> 02:23:52.620 align:middle line:90% No. 02:23:52.620 --> 02:23:53.300 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:23:53.300 --> 02:23:53.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:53.960 --> 02:23:54.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:54.510 --> 02:23:55.370 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:23:55.370 --> 02:23:56.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:56.310 --> 02:23:57.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:57.230 --> 02:23:57.860 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:23:57.860 --> 02:23:59.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:59.100 --> 02:23:59.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:23:59.740 --> 02:24:00.576 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:24:00.576 --> 02:24:01.250 align:middle line:90% No. 02:24:01.250 --> 02:24:01.930 align:middle line:90% No. 02:24:01.930 --> 02:24:02.723 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:24:02.723 --> 02:24:03.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:03.570 --> 02:24:04.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:04.220 --> 02:24:05.153 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:24:05.153 --> 02:24:05.940 align:middle line:90% Yes, 02:24:05.940 --> 02:24:06.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:06.800 --> 02:24:07.300 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:24:07.300 --> 02:24:08.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:08.290 --> 02:24:09.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:09.380 --> 02:24:10.040 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:24:10.040 --> 02:24:10.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:10.940 --> 02:24:11.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:11.760 --> 02:24:12.910 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:24:12.910 --> 02:24:13.730 align:middle line:90% No. 02:24:13.730 --> 02:24:14.940 align:middle line:90% No. 02:24:14.940 --> 02:24:15.910 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:24:15.910 --> 02:24:16.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:16.410 --> 02:24:17.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:17.510 --> 02:24:18.020 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:24:18.020 --> 02:24:18.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:18.950 --> 02:24:19.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:19.860 --> 02:24:20.730 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:24:20.730 --> 02:24:21.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:21.230 --> 02:24:22.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:22.250 --> 02:24:22.820 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:24:22.820 --> 02:24:23.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:23.710 --> 02:24:24.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:24.690 --> 02:24:25.220 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:24:25.220 --> 02:24:26.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:26.360 --> 02:24:26.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:26.990 --> 02:24:27.570 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:24:27.570 --> 02:24:28.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:28.560 --> 02:24:29.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:29.840 --> 02:24:30.370 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:24:30.370 --> 02:24:31.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:31.240 --> 02:24:32.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:32.080 --> 02:24:32.610 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:24:32.610 --> 02:24:33.710 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:33.710 --> 02:24:34.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:34.520 --> 02:24:35.090 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:24:35.090 --> 02:24:36.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:36.250 --> 02:24:37.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:37.100 --> 02:24:37.790 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:24:37.790 --> 02:24:38.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:38.780 --> 02:24:39.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:39.950 --> 02:24:40.866 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:24:40.866 --> 02:24:41.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:41.560 --> 02:24:42.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:42.720 --> 02:24:43.700 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:24:43.700 --> 02:24:44.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:44.500 --> 02:24:45.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:45.230 --> 02:24:45.920 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:24:45.920 --> 02:24:46.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:46.940 --> 02:24:47.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:47.910 --> 02:24:48.908 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:24:48.908 --> 02:24:50.402 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:50.402 --> 02:24:51.396 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:51.396 --> 02:24:51.896 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:24:51.896 --> 02:24:52.394 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:52.394 --> 02:24:52.894 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:52.894 --> 02:24:53.888 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:24:53.888 --> 02:24:54.884 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:54.884 --> 02:24:55.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:55.890 --> 02:24:56.650 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:24:56.650 --> 02:24:57.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:57.150 --> 02:24:58.143 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:24:58.143 --> 02:24:59.090 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:24:59.090 --> 02:25:00.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:00.080 --> 02:25:00.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:00.900 --> 02:25:01.770 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:25:01.770 --> 02:25:02.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:02.270 --> 02:25:02.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:02.770 --> 02:25:04.270 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:25:04.270 --> 02:25:11.270 align:middle line:90% 02:25:11.270 --> 02:25:13.770 align:middle line:84% 33 in the affirmative, four in the negative. 02:25:13.770 --> 02:25:16.120 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 33 having voted in the affirmative, 02:25:16.120 --> 02:25:17.180 align:middle line:90% four in the negative. 02:25:17.180 --> 02:25:19.180 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the governor's 02:25:19.180 --> 02:25:20.320 align:middle line:90% objections. 02:25:20.320 --> 02:25:22.000 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:25:22.000 --> 02:25:26.292 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-0020 contained in section two workforce 02:25:26.292 --> 02:25:28.750 align:middle line:84% development grant comes from the House with the endorsement 02:25:28.750 --> 02:25:30.100 align:middle line:84% that the House has passed this section 02:25:30.100 --> 02:25:31.933 align:middle line:84% notwithstanding the reduction and objections 02:25:31.933 --> 02:25:34.948 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 124 to 29. 02:25:34.948 --> 02:25:37.438 align:middle line:84% Paper-- I'm sorry, the clerk will call the roll. 02:25:37.438 --> 02:25:41.930 align:middle line:90% 02:25:41.930 --> 02:25:42.840 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:25:42.840 --> 02:25:43.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:43.660 --> 02:25:44.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:44.530 --> 02:25:45.270 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:25:45.270 --> 02:25:46.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:46.270 --> 02:25:47.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:47.180 --> 02:25:48.025 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:25:48.025 --> 02:25:48.524 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:48.524 --> 02:25:49.448 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:49.448 --> 02:25:50.341 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:25:50.341 --> 02:25:50.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:50.840 --> 02:25:51.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:51.780 --> 02:25:52.310 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:25:52.310 --> 02:25:53.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:53.130 --> 02:25:54.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:54.110 --> 02:25:54.950 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:25:54.950 --> 02:25:55.940 align:middle line:90% No. 02:25:55.940 --> 02:25:56.760 align:middle line:90% No. 02:25:56.760 --> 02:25:57.350 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:25:57.350 --> 02:25:58.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:58.670 --> 02:25:59.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:25:59.360 --> 02:26:00.280 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:26:00.280 --> 02:26:00.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:00.780 --> 02:26:01.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:01.730 --> 02:26:02.800 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:26:02.800 --> 02:26:03.660 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:03.660 --> 02:26:04.600 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:04.600 --> 02:26:05.300 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:26:05.300 --> 02:26:06.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:06.220 --> 02:26:07.265 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:07.265 --> 02:26:08.066 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:26:08.066 --> 02:26:08.780 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:08.780 --> 02:26:09.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:09.630 --> 02:26:10.420 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:26:10.420 --> 02:26:11.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:11.650 --> 02:26:12.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:12.370 --> 02:26:12.900 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:26:12.900 --> 02:26:13.850 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:13.850 --> 02:26:14.790 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:14.790 --> 02:26:15.563 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:26:15.563 --> 02:26:16.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:16.310 --> 02:26:17.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:17.030 --> 02:26:17.600 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:26:17.600 --> 02:26:18.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:18.600 --> 02:26:19.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:19.100 --> 02:26:19.916 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:26:19.916 --> 02:26:21.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:21.140 --> 02:26:22.115 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:22.115 --> 02:26:22.981 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:26:22.981 --> 02:26:23.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:23.480 --> 02:26:24.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:24.380 --> 02:26:25.200 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:26:25.200 --> 02:26:25.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:25.940 --> 02:26:27.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:27.140 --> 02:26:27.700 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:26:27.700 --> 02:26:28.670 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:28.670 --> 02:26:29.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:29.550 --> 02:26:30.396 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:26:30.396 --> 02:26:31.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:31.170 --> 02:26:31.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:31.990 --> 02:26:32.490 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:26:32.490 --> 02:26:33.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:33.660 --> 02:26:34.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:34.760 --> 02:26:35.700 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:26:35.700 --> 02:26:36.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:36.380 --> 02:26:36.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:36.880 --> 02:26:37.715 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:26:37.715 --> 02:26:38.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:38.820 --> 02:26:39.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:39.690 --> 02:26:40.190 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:26:40.190 --> 02:26:41.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:41.100 --> 02:26:42.103 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:42.103 --> 02:26:42.970 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:26:42.970 --> 02:26:43.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:43.910 --> 02:26:45.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:45.000 --> 02:26:45.690 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:26:45.690 --> 02:26:47.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:47.270 --> 02:26:48.100 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:26:48.100 --> 02:26:48.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:48.920 --> 02:26:49.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:49.860 --> 02:26:50.490 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:26:50.490 --> 02:26:51.290 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:51.290 --> 02:26:52.220 align:middle line:90% No. 02:26:52.220 --> 02:26:53.660 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:26:53.660 --> 02:26:54.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:54.380 --> 02:26:55.840 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:55.840 --> 02:26:56.640 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:26:56.640 --> 02:26:57.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:57.500 --> 02:26:58.510 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:26:58.510 --> 02:26:59.160 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:26:59.160 --> 02:27:00.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:00.230 --> 02:27:01.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:01.040 --> 02:27:01.550 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:27:01.550 --> 02:27:02.660 align:middle line:90% No. 02:27:02.660 --> 02:27:03.910 align:middle line:90% No. 02:27:03.910 --> 02:27:04.646 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:27:04.646 --> 02:27:05.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:05.340 --> 02:27:06.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:06.130 --> 02:27:06.910 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:27:06.910 --> 02:27:08.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:08.030 --> 02:27:08.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:08.560 --> 02:27:10.040 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:27:10.040 --> 02:27:10.551 align:middle line:90% No. 02:27:10.551 --> 02:27:11.050 align:middle line:90% No. 02:27:11.050 --> 02:27:11.550 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:27:11.550 --> 02:27:12.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:12.500 --> 02:27:13.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:13.130 --> 02:27:13.988 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:27:13.988 --> 02:27:14.488 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:27:14.488 --> 02:27:14.988 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:27:14.988 --> 02:27:16.983 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:27:16.983 --> 02:27:24.970 align:middle line:90% 02:27:24.970 --> 02:27:27.100 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 having voted in the affirmative, 02:27:27.100 --> 02:27:28.000 align:middle line:90% 6 in the negative. 02:27:28.000 --> 02:27:30.280 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the governor's 02:27:30.280 --> 02:27:31.120 align:middle line:90% objections. 02:27:31.120 --> 02:27:32.140 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:27:32.140 --> 02:27:36.466 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-0032 contained in section two innovation 02:27:36.466 --> 02:27:38.590 align:middle line:84% institute comes from the House with the endorsement 02:27:38.590 --> 02:27:40.881 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the reduction 02:27:40.881 --> 02:27:43.570 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor 117 to 34. 02:27:43.570 --> 02:27:47.106 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:27:47.106 --> 02:27:48.588 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:27:48.588 --> 02:27:51.058 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] Yes. 02:27:51.058 --> 02:27:52.046 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:27:52.046 --> 02:27:55.010 align:middle line:90% 02:27:55.010 --> 02:27:56.492 align:middle line:90% Barrett votes yes. 02:27:56.492 --> 02:28:00.950 align:middle line:90% 02:28:00.950 --> 02:28:02.040 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:28:02.040 --> 02:28:02.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:02.930 --> 02:28:03.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:03.920 --> 02:28:04.630 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:28:04.630 --> 02:28:05.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:05.130 --> 02:28:06.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:06.080 --> 02:28:06.930 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:28:06.930 --> 02:28:07.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:07.720 --> 02:28:08.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:08.660 --> 02:28:09.533 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:28:09.533 --> 02:28:10.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:10.260 --> 02:28:11.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:11.030 --> 02:28:11.960 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:28:11.960 --> 02:28:12.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:12.590 --> 02:28:13.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:13.580 --> 02:28:14.100 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:28:14.100 --> 02:28:15.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:15.070 --> 02:28:15.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:15.910 --> 02:28:16.410 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:28:16.410 --> 02:28:17.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:17.160 --> 02:28:18.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:18.190 --> 02:28:19.783 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:28:19.783 --> 02:28:20.510 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:20.510 --> 02:28:21.520 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:21.520 --> 02:28:22.250 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:28:22.250 --> 02:28:23.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:23.060 --> 02:28:24.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:24.050 --> 02:28:24.650 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:28:24.650 --> 02:28:25.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:25.610 --> 02:28:26.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:26.480 --> 02:28:27.040 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:28:27.040 --> 02:28:28.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:28.080 --> 02:28:28.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:28.700 --> 02:28:29.210 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:28:29.210 --> 02:28:29.930 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:29.930 --> 02:28:30.930 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:30.930 --> 02:28:31.600 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:28:31.600 --> 02:28:32.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:32.300 --> 02:28:33.266 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:33.266 --> 02:28:33.766 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:28:33.766 --> 02:28:34.762 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:28:34.762 --> 02:28:35.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:35.370 --> 02:28:35.870 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:28:35.870 --> 02:28:37.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:37.270 --> 02:28:38.082 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:38.082 --> 02:28:38.582 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:28:38.582 --> 02:28:39.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:39.830 --> 02:28:40.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:40.530 --> 02:28:41.030 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:28:41.030 --> 02:28:42.160 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:42.160 --> 02:28:43.096 align:middle line:90% No. 02:28:43.096 --> 02:28:45.030 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:28:45.030 --> 02:28:45.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:45.530 --> 02:28:46.741 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:46.741 --> 02:28:47.240 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:28:47.240 --> 02:28:48.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:48.180 --> 02:28:49.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:49.120 --> 02:28:49.620 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:28:49.620 --> 02:28:50.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:50.600 --> 02:28:51.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:51.560 --> 02:28:52.100 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:28:52.100 --> 02:28:52.960 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:52.960 --> 02:28:53.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:53.750 --> 02:28:54.570 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:28:54.570 --> 02:28:55.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:55.660 --> 02:28:56.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:56.660 --> 02:28:57.490 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:28:57.490 --> 02:28:58.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:58.190 --> 02:28:59.520 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:28:59.520 --> 02:29:00.080 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:29:00.080 --> 02:29:01.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:01.080 --> 02:29:02.120 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:02.120 --> 02:29:02.850 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:29:02.850 --> 02:29:03.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:03.610 --> 02:29:04.542 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:04.542 --> 02:29:05.401 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:29:05.401 --> 02:29:05.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:05.900 --> 02:29:07.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:07.490 --> 02:29:08.150 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:29:08.150 --> 02:29:08.900 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:08.900 --> 02:29:10.207 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:10.207 --> 02:29:10.790 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:29:10.790 --> 02:29:11.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:11.750 --> 02:29:13.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:13.060 --> 02:29:13.806 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:29:13.806 --> 02:29:14.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:14.760 --> 02:29:15.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:15.590 --> 02:29:16.220 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:29:16.220 --> 02:29:17.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:17.330 --> 02:29:18.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:18.230 --> 02:29:19.143 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:29:19.143 --> 02:29:19.970 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:19.970 --> 02:29:21.320 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:21.320 --> 02:29:21.860 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:29:21.860 --> 02:29:22.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:22.760 --> 02:29:24.493 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:24.493 --> 02:29:25.455 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:29:25.455 --> 02:29:26.417 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:26.417 --> 02:29:27.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:27.860 --> 02:29:30.120 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:29:30.120 --> 02:29:32.580 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:29:32.580 --> 02:29:33.080 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:33.080 --> 02:29:34.290 align:middle line:90% No. 02:29:34.290 --> 02:29:34.820 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:29:34.820 --> 02:29:35.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:35.470 --> 02:29:36.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:36.900 --> 02:29:37.640 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:29:37.640 --> 02:29:38.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:38.140 --> 02:29:40.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:29:40.980 --> 02:29:43.446 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:29:43.446 --> 02:29:45.380 align:middle line:84% 31 in the affirmative, six in the negative. 02:29:45.380 --> 02:29:47.577 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 having voted in the affirmative, 02:29:47.577 --> 02:29:48.410 align:middle line:90% six in the negative. 02:29:48.410 --> 02:29:50.409 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the governor's 02:29:50.409 --> 02:29:51.350 align:middle line:90% objections. 02:29:51.350 --> 02:29:52.710 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:29:52.710 --> 02:29:56.640 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-0033 international trade 02:29:56.640 --> 02:29:58.420 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 02:29:58.420 --> 02:30:02.318 align:middle line:84% that this item was passed notwithstanding the disapproval 02:30:02.318 --> 02:30:07.686 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor 119 to 33. 02:30:07.686 --> 02:30:09.150 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:30:09.150 --> 02:30:16.470 align:middle line:90% 02:30:16.470 --> 02:30:18.910 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:30:18.910 --> 02:30:20.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:20.190 --> 02:30:22.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:22.320 --> 02:30:23.873 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:30:23.873 --> 02:30:24.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:24.720 --> 02:30:25.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:25.680 --> 02:30:26.436 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:30:26.436 --> 02:30:27.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:27.430 --> 02:30:28.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:28.040 --> 02:30:28.780 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:30:28.780 --> 02:30:29.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:29.620 --> 02:30:30.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:30.940 --> 02:30:31.470 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:30:31.470 --> 02:30:32.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:32.170 --> 02:30:33.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:33.850 --> 02:30:34.630 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:30:34.630 --> 02:30:35.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:35.530 --> 02:30:36.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:36.550 --> 02:30:37.050 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:30:37.050 --> 02:30:37.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:37.870 --> 02:30:38.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:38.430 --> 02:30:39.190 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:30:39.190 --> 02:30:39.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:39.950 --> 02:30:41.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:41.260 --> 02:30:42.744 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:30:42.744 --> 02:30:43.510 align:middle line:90% No. 02:30:43.510 --> 02:30:44.240 align:middle line:90% No. 02:30:44.240 --> 02:30:45.330 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:30:45.330 --> 02:30:46.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:46.030 --> 02:30:46.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:46.930 --> 02:30:47.500 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:30:47.500 --> 02:30:48.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:48.420 --> 02:30:49.454 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:49.454 --> 02:30:50.262 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:30:50.262 --> 02:30:51.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:51.070 --> 02:30:51.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:51.580 --> 02:30:52.080 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:30:52.080 --> 02:30:52.890 align:middle line:90% No. 02:30:52.890 --> 02:30:53.620 align:middle line:90% No. 02:30:53.620 --> 02:30:54.120 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:30:54.120 --> 02:30:55.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:55.330 --> 02:30:56.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:56.050 --> 02:30:56.560 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:30:56.560 --> 02:30:57.410 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:30:57.410 --> 02:30:58.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:30:58.300 --> 02:30:58.800 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:30:58.800 --> 02:31:00.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:00.040 --> 02:31:00.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:00.540 --> 02:31:01.510 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:31:01.510 --> 02:31:02.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:02.470 --> 02:31:03.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:03.380 --> 02:31:04.196 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:31:04.196 --> 02:31:05.010 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:05.010 --> 02:31:06.010 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:06.010 --> 02:31:07.284 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:31:07.284 --> 02:31:08.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:08.050 --> 02:31:08.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:08.950 --> 02:31:09.830 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:31:09.830 --> 02:31:10.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:10.590 --> 02:31:11.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:11.500 --> 02:31:12.970 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:31:12.970 --> 02:31:13.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:13.470 --> 02:31:14.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:14.440 --> 02:31:14.990 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:31:14.990 --> 02:31:16.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:16.270 --> 02:31:16.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:16.900 --> 02:31:17.650 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:31:17.650 --> 02:31:18.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:18.540 --> 02:31:19.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:19.660 --> 02:31:20.576 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:31:20.576 --> 02:31:21.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:21.370 --> 02:31:22.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:22.360 --> 02:31:22.860 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:31:22.860 --> 02:31:23.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:23.850 --> 02:31:24.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:24.800 --> 02:31:26.110 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:31:26.110 --> 02:31:27.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:27.010 --> 02:31:27.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:27.980 --> 02:31:28.816 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:31:28.816 --> 02:31:29.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:29.570 --> 02:31:30.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:30.430 --> 02:31:31.420 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:31:31.420 --> 02:31:32.140 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:32.140 --> 02:31:33.230 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:33.230 --> 02:31:34.210 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:31:34.210 --> 02:31:35.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:35.150 --> 02:31:36.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:36.460 --> 02:31:37.160 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:31:37.160 --> 02:31:38.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:38.650 --> 02:31:39.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:39.480 --> 02:31:40.283 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:31:40.283 --> 02:31:41.050 align:middle line:90% Yes 02:31:41.050 --> 02:31:42.160 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:42.160 --> 02:31:43.106 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:31:43.106 --> 02:31:43.920 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:43.920 --> 02:31:45.060 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:45.060 --> 02:31:45.876 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:31:45.876 --> 02:31:46.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:46.550 --> 02:31:47.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:47.600 --> 02:31:48.380 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:31:48.380 --> 02:31:49.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:49.330 --> 02:31:49.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:49.900 --> 02:31:50.804 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:31:50.804 --> 02:31:51.710 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:51.710 --> 02:31:52.560 align:middle line:90% No. 02:31:52.560 --> 02:31:53.400 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:31:53.400 --> 02:31:54.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:54.360 --> 02:31:55.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:55.230 --> 02:31:55.730 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:31:55.730 --> 02:31:57.194 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:31:57.194 --> 02:31:59.146 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:31:59.146 --> 02:32:07.442 align:middle line:90% 02:32:07.442 --> 02:32:09.350 align:middle line:84% 31 in the affirmative, six in the negative. 02:32:09.350 --> 02:32:10.764 align:middle line:84% On this matter, thirty-one having 02:32:10.764 --> 02:32:12.680 align:middle line:84% voted in the affirmative, six in the negative. 02:32:12.680 --> 02:32:15.010 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the objections 02:32:15.010 --> 02:32:16.296 align:middle line:90% of the governor. 02:32:16.296 --> 02:32:17.170 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:32:17.170 --> 02:32:21.924 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-1502 contained in section two transformative 02:32:21.924 --> 02:32:24.340 align:middle line:84% development fund comes from the House with the endorsement 02:32:24.340 --> 02:32:27.580 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the disapproval 02:32:27.580 --> 02:32:30.810 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor, 117 to 34. 02:32:30.810 --> 02:32:32.790 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:32:32.790 --> 02:32:38.235 align:middle line:90% 02:32:38.235 --> 02:32:39.225 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:32:39.225 --> 02:32:40.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:40.220 --> 02:32:41.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:41.530 --> 02:32:42.101 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:32:42.101 --> 02:32:42.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:42.600 --> 02:32:43.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:43.660 --> 02:32:44.180 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:32:44.180 --> 02:32:44.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:44.870 --> 02:32:45.645 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:45.645 --> 02:32:46.186 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:32:46.186 --> 02:32:47.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:47.280 --> 02:32:48.500 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:48.500 --> 02:32:49.010 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:32:49.010 --> 02:32:49.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:49.950 --> 02:32:50.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:50.920 --> 02:32:51.700 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:32:51.700 --> 02:32:52.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:52.600 --> 02:32:53.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:53.880 --> 02:32:54.800 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:32:54.800 --> 02:32:55.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:55.620 --> 02:32:56.504 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:56.504 --> 02:32:57.004 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:32:57.004 --> 02:32:57.880 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:57.880 --> 02:32:58.930 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:32:58.930 --> 02:32:59.680 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:32:59.680 --> 02:33:00.400 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:00.400 --> 02:33:01.240 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:01.240 --> 02:33:02.600 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:33:02.600 --> 02:33:03.440 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:03.440 --> 02:33:04.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:04.420 --> 02:33:05.386 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:33:05.386 --> 02:33:06.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:06.340 --> 02:33:07.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:07.320 --> 02:33:07.900 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:33:07.900 --> 02:33:09.220 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:09.220 --> 02:33:09.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:09.950 --> 02:33:10.450 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:33:10.450 --> 02:33:11.360 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:11.360 --> 02:33:12.650 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:12.650 --> 02:33:13.543 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:33:13.543 --> 02:33:14.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:14.530 --> 02:33:15.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:15.650 --> 02:33:16.503 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:33:16.503 --> 02:33:17.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:17.250 --> 02:33:18.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:18.380 --> 02:33:19.343 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:33:19.343 --> 02:33:20.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:20.290 --> 02:33:21.262 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:21.262 --> 02:33:22.126 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:33:22.126 --> 02:33:23.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:23.860 --> 02:33:24.593 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:33:24.593 --> 02:33:25.360 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:25.360 --> 02:33:26.840 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:26.840 --> 02:33:28.114 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:33:28.114 --> 02:33:28.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:28.870 --> 02:33:29.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:29.890 --> 02:33:30.390 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:33:30.390 --> 02:33:31.320 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:31.320 --> 02:33:32.240 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:32.240 --> 02:33:33.190 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:33:33.190 --> 02:33:34.150 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:34.150 --> 02:33:35.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:35.060 --> 02:33:35.670 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:33:35.670 --> 02:33:37.020 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:37.020 --> 02:33:37.730 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:37.730 --> 02:33:38.230 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:33:38.230 --> 02:33:39.940 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:39.940 --> 02:33:40.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:40.810 --> 02:33:41.320 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:33:41.320 --> 02:33:42.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:42.820 --> 02:33:44.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:44.000 --> 02:33:45.036 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:33:45.036 --> 02:33:45.890 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:45.890 --> 02:33:47.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:47.060 --> 02:33:47.560 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:33:47.560 --> 02:33:48.140 align:middle line:90% Yes 02:33:48.140 --> 02:33:49.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:49.690 --> 02:33:50.723 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:33:50.723 --> 02:33:51.690 align:middle line:90% yes 02:33:51.690 --> 02:33:52.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:52.720 --> 02:33:53.703 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:33:53.703 --> 02:33:54.430 align:middle line:90% No. 02:33:54.430 --> 02:33:56.603 align:middle line:90% no O'Connor Ives? 02:33:56.603 --> 02:33:57.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:57.470 --> 02:33:58.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:33:58.970 --> 02:34:00.210 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:34:00.210 --> 02:34:01.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:01.000 --> 02:34:01.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:01.810 --> 02:34:02.896 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:34:02.896 --> 02:34:03.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:03.750 --> 02:34:04.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:04.750 --> 02:34:05.583 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:34:05.583 --> 02:34:06.430 align:middle line:90% No. 02:34:06.430 --> 02:34:07.900 align:middle line:90% No. 02:34:07.900 --> 02:34:08.490 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:34:08.490 --> 02:34:08.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:08.990 --> 02:34:10.000 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:10.000 --> 02:34:10.750 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:34:10.750 --> 02:34:11.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:11.830 --> 02:34:13.166 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:13.166 --> 02:34:14.062 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:34:14.062 --> 02:34:14.960 align:middle line:90% No. 02:34:14.960 --> 02:34:15.910 align:middle line:90% No. 02:34:15.910 --> 02:34:16.880 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:34:16.880 --> 02:34:17.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:17.380 --> 02:34:18.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:18.190 --> 02:34:18.890 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:34:18.890 --> 02:34:19.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:19.390 --> 02:34:20.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:20.330 --> 02:34:21.620 align:middle line:90% Have all members been record? 02:34:21.620 --> 02:34:28.469 align:middle line:90% 02:34:28.469 --> 02:34:30.260 align:middle line:84% 31 in the affirmative, six in the negative. 02:34:30.260 --> 02:34:32.390 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 have voted in the affirmative, 02:34:32.390 --> 02:34:33.300 align:middle line:90% six in the negative. 02:34:33.300 --> 02:34:35.390 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the governor's 02:34:35.390 --> 02:34:36.320 align:middle line:90% objections. 02:34:36.320 --> 02:34:37.400 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:34:37.400 --> 02:34:41.464 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-1508 contained in section two Mass Tech 02:34:41.464 --> 02:34:42.880 align:middle line:84% collaborative comes from the House 02:34:42.880 --> 02:34:44.296 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement this item has 02:34:44.296 --> 02:34:46.760 align:middle line:84% passed notwithstanding the disapproval of his excellency 02:34:46.760 --> 02:34:49.694 align:middle line:90% the governor, 117 to 35. 02:34:49.694 --> 02:34:51.128 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:34:51.128 --> 02:34:53.996 align:middle line:90% 02:34:53.996 --> 02:34:54.952 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:34:54.952 --> 02:34:56.386 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:56.386 --> 02:34:57.342 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:57.342 --> 02:34:58.298 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:34:58.298 --> 02:34:59.270 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:34:59.270 --> 02:35:00.046 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:00.046 --> 02:35:00.885 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:35:00.885 --> 02:35:01.384 align:middle line:90% Yes 02:35:01.384 --> 02:35:02.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:02.280 --> 02:35:03.210 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:35:03.210 --> 02:35:04.014 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:04.014 --> 02:35:04.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:04.820 --> 02:35:05.430 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:35:05.430 --> 02:35:06.424 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:06.424 --> 02:35:07.418 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:07.418 --> 02:35:08.410 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:35:08.410 --> 02:35:08.910 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:08.910 --> 02:35:09.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:09.760 --> 02:35:11.355 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:35:11.355 --> 02:35:12.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:12.630 --> 02:35:13.230 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:13.230 --> 02:35:13.976 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:35:13.976 --> 02:35:14.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:14.590 --> 02:35:15.660 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:15.660 --> 02:35:16.547 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:35:16.547 --> 02:35:17.710 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:17.710 --> 02:35:19.126 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:19.126 --> 02:35:20.605 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:35:20.605 --> 02:35:21.584 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:21.584 --> 02:35:22.084 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:22.084 --> 02:35:25.050 align:middle line:90% 02:35:25.050 --> 02:35:25.600 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:35:25.600 --> 02:35:26.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:26.360 --> 02:35:27.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:27.620 --> 02:35:28.130 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:35:28.130 --> 02:35:28.800 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:28.800 --> 02:35:29.770 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:29.770 --> 02:35:30.583 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:35:30.583 --> 02:35:31.350 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:31.350 --> 02:35:32.250 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:32.250 --> 02:35:33.333 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:35:33.333 --> 02:35:34.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:34.300 --> 02:35:35.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:35.450 --> 02:35:36.130 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:35:36.130 --> 02:35:36.630 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:36.630 --> 02:35:38.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:38.030 --> 02:35:38.530 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:35:38.530 --> 02:35:39.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:39.620 --> 02:35:40.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:40.590 --> 02:35:41.090 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:35:41.090 --> 02:35:41.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:41.590 --> 02:35:42.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:42.790 --> 02:35:43.656 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:35:43.656 --> 02:35:44.490 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:44.490 --> 02:35:45.520 align:middle line:90% No. 02:35:45.520 --> 02:35:46.370 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:35:46.370 --> 02:35:47.170 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:47.170 --> 02:35:48.214 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:48.214 --> 02:35:48.714 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:35:48.714 --> 02:35:49.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:49.690 --> 02:35:50.640 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:50.640 --> 02:35:51.560 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:35:51.560 --> 02:35:52.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:52.540 --> 02:35:53.530 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:53.530 --> 02:35:54.070 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:35:54.070 --> 02:35:54.860 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:54.860 --> 02:35:56.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:56.060 --> 02:35:56.710 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:35:56.710 --> 02:35:57.570 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:57.570 --> 02:35:58.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:35:58.540 --> 02:35:59.050 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:35:59.050 --> 02:36:00.580 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:00.580 --> 02:36:01.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:01.720 --> 02:36:02.410 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:36:02.410 --> 02:36:03.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:03.380 --> 02:36:04.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:04.180 --> 02:36:04.960 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:36:04.960 --> 02:36:05.950 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:05.950 --> 02:36:06.980 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:06.980 --> 02:36:07.776 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:36:07.776 --> 02:36:08.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:08.550 --> 02:36:09.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:09.550 --> 02:36:10.960 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:36:10.960 --> 02:36:11.740 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:11.740 --> 02:36:13.080 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:13.080 --> 02:36:14.060 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:36:14.060 --> 02:36:14.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:14.560 --> 02:36:15.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:15.400 --> 02:36:16.300 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:36:16.300 --> 02:36:17.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:17.650 --> 02:36:18.574 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:18.574 --> 02:36:19.562 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:36:19.562 --> 02:36:21.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:21.540 --> 02:36:24.250 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:36:24.250 --> 02:36:25.660 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:36:25.660 --> 02:36:26.160 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:26.160 --> 02:36:27.870 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:27.870 --> 02:36:28.526 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:36:28.526 --> 02:36:29.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:29.360 --> 02:36:30.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:30.590 --> 02:36:31.120 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:36:31.120 --> 02:36:32.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:32.060 --> 02:36:33.028 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:33.028 --> 02:36:33.944 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:36:33.944 --> 02:36:34.860 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:34.860 --> 02:36:35.890 align:middle line:90% No. 02:36:35.890 --> 02:36:36.713 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:36:36.713 --> 02:36:37.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:37.400 --> 02:36:38.130 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:38.130 --> 02:36:39.046 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:36:39.046 --> 02:36:40.038 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:36:40.038 --> 02:36:42.022 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:36:42.022 --> 02:36:46.982 align:middle line:90% 02:36:46.982 --> 02:36:48.966 align:middle line:84% 31 in the affirmative, six in the negative. 02:36:48.966 --> 02:36:51.390 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 31 having voted in the affirmative, 02:36:51.390 --> 02:36:52.300 align:middle line:90% six in the negative. 02:36:52.300 --> 02:36:54.060 align:middle line:84% The matter passes not withstanding 02:36:54.060 --> 02:36:55.230 align:middle line:90% the governor's objections. 02:36:55.230 --> 02:36:56.370 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:36:56.370 --> 02:37:00.850 align:middle line:84% Item 7002-1512 contained in section two big data innovation 02:37:00.850 --> 02:37:02.514 align:middle line:84% and workforce fund comes from the House 02:37:02.514 --> 02:37:03.930 align:middle line:84% with the endorsement this item has 02:37:03.930 --> 02:37:06.600 align:middle line:84% passed notwithstanding the disapproval of his excellency 02:37:06.600 --> 02:37:08.451 align:middle line:90% the governor, 118 to 34. 02:37:08.451 --> 02:37:09.912 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:37:09.912 --> 02:37:13.321 align:middle line:90% 02:37:13.321 --> 02:37:15.176 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:37:15.176 --> 02:37:15.676 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:15.676 --> 02:37:16.662 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:16.662 --> 02:37:18.134 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:37:18.134 --> 02:37:18.634 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:18.634 --> 02:37:19.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:19.620 --> 02:37:20.606 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:37:20.606 --> 02:37:21.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:21.110 --> 02:37:23.116 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:23.116 --> 02:37:23.740 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:37:23.740 --> 02:37:24.350 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:37:24.350 --> 02:37:25.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:25.370 --> 02:37:25.880 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:37:25.880 --> 02:37:26.870 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:26.870 --> 02:37:27.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:27.600 --> 02:37:28.668 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:37:28.668 --> 02:37:29.168 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:29.168 --> 02:37:30.124 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:30.124 --> 02:37:31.058 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:37:31.058 --> 02:37:31.558 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:31.558 --> 02:37:33.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:33.470 --> 02:37:34.404 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:37:34.404 --> 02:37:34.904 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:34.904 --> 02:37:36.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:36.090 --> 02:37:37.070 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:37:37.070 --> 02:37:37.890 align:middle line:90% No. 02:37:37.890 --> 02:37:39.040 align:middle line:90% No. 02:37:39.040 --> 02:37:40.290 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:37:40.290 --> 02:37:40.790 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:37:40.790 --> 02:37:42.340 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:42.340 --> 02:37:43.250 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:37:43.250 --> 02:37:43.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:43.750 --> 02:37:45.127 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:45.127 --> 02:37:45.627 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:37:45.627 --> 02:37:46.605 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:46.605 --> 02:37:47.572 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:47.572 --> 02:37:48.072 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:37:48.072 --> 02:37:49.050 align:middle line:90% No. 02:37:49.050 --> 02:37:51.020 align:middle line:90% No. 02:37:51.020 --> 02:37:51.660 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:37:51.660 --> 02:37:52.400 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:52.400 --> 02:37:53.620 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:53.620 --> 02:37:54.456 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:37:54.456 --> 02:37:54.955 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:54.955 --> 02:37:56.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:56.290 --> 02:37:56.990 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:37:56.990 --> 02:37:57.830 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:57.830 --> 02:37:59.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:37:59.080 --> 02:37:59.896 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:37:59.896 --> 02:38:00.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:00.750 --> 02:38:02.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:02.380 --> 02:38:02.880 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:38:02.880 --> 02:38:03.810 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:03.810 --> 02:38:04.740 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:04.740 --> 02:38:06.101 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:38:06.101 --> 02:38:06.600 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:06.600 --> 02:38:07.942 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:07.942 --> 02:38:08.442 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:38:08.442 --> 02:38:09.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:09.410 --> 02:38:10.610 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:10.610 --> 02:38:11.380 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:38:11.380 --> 02:38:12.260 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:12.260 --> 02:38:13.105 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:13.105 --> 02:38:14.015 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:38:14.015 --> 02:38:14.925 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:14.925 --> 02:38:16.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:16.290 --> 02:38:17.190 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:38:17.190 --> 02:38:17.690 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:17.690 --> 02:38:18.900 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:18.900 --> 02:38:19.570 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:38:19.570 --> 02:38:20.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:20.070 --> 02:38:21.591 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:21.591 --> 02:38:22.090 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:38:22.090 --> 02:38:23.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:23.480 --> 02:38:24.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:24.380 --> 02:38:25.340 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:38:25.340 --> 02:38:26.270 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:26.270 --> 02:38:27.830 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:27.830 --> 02:38:28.950 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:38:28.950 --> 02:38:29.720 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:29.720 --> 02:38:31.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:31.450 --> 02:38:31.950 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:38:31.950 --> 02:38:32.900 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:32.900 --> 02:38:34.330 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:34.330 --> 02:38:35.327 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:38:35.327 --> 02:38:36.820 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:36.820 --> 02:38:37.675 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:37.675 --> 02:38:38.545 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:38:38.545 --> 02:38:39.850 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:39.850 --> 02:38:40.658 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:40.658 --> 02:38:41.474 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:38:41.474 --> 02:38:42.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:42.290 --> 02:38:43.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:43.590 --> 02:38:44.480 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:38:44.480 --> 02:38:44.980 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:44.980 --> 02:38:46.390 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:46.390 --> 02:38:47.800 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:38:47.800 --> 02:38:48.740 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:48.740 --> 02:38:49.893 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:49.893 --> 02:38:51.149 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:38:51.149 --> 02:38:51.649 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:51.649 --> 02:38:52.627 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:52.627 --> 02:38:53.594 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:38:53.594 --> 02:38:54.094 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:54.094 --> 02:38:55.072 align:middle line:90% No. 02:38:55.072 --> 02:38:56.050 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:38:56.050 --> 02:38:57.028 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:57.028 --> 02:38:58.484 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:38:58.484 --> 02:38:58.984 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:38:58.984 --> 02:39:00.451 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:00.451 --> 02:39:02.407 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:39:02.407 --> 02:39:09.742 align:middle line:90% 02:39:09.742 --> 02:39:12.190 align:middle line:84% 30 in the affirmative, seven in the negative. 02:39:12.190 --> 02:39:14.330 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 30 having voted in the affirmative, 02:39:14.330 --> 02:39:15.330 align:middle line:90% seven in the negative. 02:39:15.330 --> 02:39:17.990 align:middle line:84% The matter passes notwithstanding the objections 02:39:17.990 --> 02:39:19.110 align:middle line:90% of the governor. 02:39:19.110 --> 02:39:20.120 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:39:20.120 --> 02:39:24.620 align:middle line:84% Item 7003-0100 contained in section two executive 02:39:24.620 --> 02:39:27.050 align:middle line:84% office of labor and workforce development administration 02:39:27.050 --> 02:39:28.530 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 02:39:28.530 --> 02:39:30.821 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the reduction 02:39:30.821 --> 02:39:35.534 align:middle line:84% and objections of his excellency the governor, 121 to 34. 02:39:35.534 --> 02:39:37.028 align:middle line:90% Clerk will call the roll. 02:39:37.028 --> 02:39:43.004 align:middle line:90% 02:39:43.004 --> 02:39:45.492 align:middle line:90% Brady-- I'm sorry, Barrett? 02:39:45.492 --> 02:39:45.992 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:45.992 --> 02:39:46.986 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:46.986 --> 02:39:47.486 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:39:47.486 --> 02:39:47.984 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:47.984 --> 02:39:48.484 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:48.484 --> 02:39:49.476 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:39:49.476 --> 02:39:49.976 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:49.976 --> 02:39:50.929 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:50.929 --> 02:39:51.470 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:39:51.470 --> 02:39:52.466 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:52.466 --> 02:39:53.460 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:53.460 --> 02:39:53.960 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:39:53.960 --> 02:39:54.956 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:54.956 --> 02:39:56.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:39:56.330 --> 02:39:56.830 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:39:56.830 --> 02:39:57.680 align:middle line:90% No. 02:39:57.680 --> 02:39:58.980 align:middle line:90% No. 02:39:58.980 --> 02:39:59.560 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:39:59.560 --> 02:40:00.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:00.370 --> 02:40:01.221 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:01.221 --> 02:40:01.720 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:40:01.720 --> 02:40:02.576 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:02.576 --> 02:40:03.650 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:03.650 --> 02:40:04.150 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:40:04.150 --> 02:40:04.910 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:04.910 --> 02:40:05.970 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:05.970 --> 02:40:07.508 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:40:07.508 --> 02:40:08.404 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:40:08.404 --> 02:40:09.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:09.750 --> 02:40:10.750 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:40:10.750 --> 02:40:11.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:11.250 --> 02:40:12.250 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:12.250 --> 02:40:13.250 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:40:13.250 --> 02:40:13.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:13.750 --> 02:40:14.750 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:14.750 --> 02:40:15.729 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:40:15.729 --> 02:40:16.229 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:16.229 --> 02:40:17.708 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:17.708 --> 02:40:19.180 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:40:19.180 --> 02:40:19.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:19.680 --> 02:40:20.659 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:20.659 --> 02:40:21.159 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:40:21.159 --> 02:40:22.638 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:40:22.638 --> 02:40:24.110 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:24.110 --> 02:40:24.610 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:40:24.610 --> 02:40:25.596 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:25.596 --> 02:40:26.575 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:26.575 --> 02:40:27.075 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:40:27.075 --> 02:40:28.554 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:28.554 --> 02:40:29.533 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:29.533 --> 02:40:30.033 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:40:30.033 --> 02:40:30.533 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:30.533 --> 02:40:31.512 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:31.512 --> 02:40:32.984 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:40:32.984 --> 02:40:33.484 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:33.484 --> 02:40:34.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:34.470 --> 02:40:35.456 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:40:35.456 --> 02:40:36.928 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:36.928 --> 02:40:37.428 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:37.428 --> 02:40:37.928 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:40:37.928 --> 02:40:38.907 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:38.907 --> 02:40:39.886 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:39.886 --> 02:40:40.386 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:40:40.386 --> 02:40:41.865 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:41.865 --> 02:40:42.851 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:42.851 --> 02:40:43.830 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:40:43.830 --> 02:40:44.330 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:44.330 --> 02:40:45.774 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:45.774 --> 02:40:46.273 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:40:46.273 --> 02:40:47.180 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:47.180 --> 02:40:48.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:48.040 --> 02:40:48.590 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:40:48.590 --> 02:40:49.542 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:49.542 --> 02:40:50.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:50.970 --> 02:40:51.680 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:40:51.680 --> 02:40:53.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:53.050 --> 02:40:54.190 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:54.190 --> 02:40:54.690 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:40:54.690 --> 02:40:55.540 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:55.540 --> 02:40:56.470 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:40:56.470 --> 02:40:57.566 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:40:57.566 --> 02:40:58.380 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:58.380 --> 02:40:59.620 align:middle line:90% No. 02:40:59.620 --> 02:41:00.986 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:41:00.986 --> 02:41:01.810 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:01.810 --> 02:41:03.200 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:03.200 --> 02:41:04.215 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:41:04.215 --> 02:41:05.700 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:05.700 --> 02:41:06.662 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:41:06.662 --> 02:41:08.140 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:08.140 --> 02:41:09.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:09.430 --> 02:41:10.400 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:41:10.400 --> 02:41:11.085 align:middle line:90% No. 02:41:11.085 --> 02:41:11.700 align:middle line:90% No. 02:41:11.700 --> 02:41:12.696 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:41:12.696 --> 02:41:13.692 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:13.692 --> 02:41:14.688 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:14.688 --> 02:41:16.180 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:41:16.180 --> 02:41:16.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:16.680 --> 02:41:17.676 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:17.676 --> 02:41:18.672 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:41:18.672 --> 02:41:19.680 align:middle line:90% No. 02:41:19.680 --> 02:41:20.640 align:middle line:90% No. 02:41:20.640 --> 02:41:21.160 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:41:21.160 --> 02:41:22.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:22.380 --> 02:41:23.680 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:23.680 --> 02:41:24.489 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:41:24.489 --> 02:41:25.467 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:41:25.467 --> 02:41:27.423 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:41:27.423 --> 02:41:36.714 align:middle line:90% 02:41:36.714 --> 02:41:38.670 align:middle line:84% 30 in the affirmative, seven in the negative. 02:41:38.670 --> 02:41:40.890 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 30 having voted in the affirmative, 02:41:40.890 --> 02:41:41.980 align:middle line:90% 7 in the negative. 02:41:41.980 --> 02:41:43.710 align:middle line:84% The matter passes not withstanding 02:41:43.710 --> 02:41:45.360 align:middle line:90% the objections of the governor. 02:41:45.360 --> 02:41:46.680 align:middle line:90% Paper from the House. 02:41:46.680 --> 02:41:52.710 align:middle line:84% Item 7003-0607 contained in section two employment program 02:41:52.710 --> 02:41:54.240 align:middle line:84% for young adults with disabilities 02:41:54.240 --> 02:41:56.010 align:middle line:84% comes from the House with the endorsement 02:41:56.010 --> 02:41:58.384 align:middle line:84% that this item has passed notwithstanding the disapproval 02:41:58.384 --> 02:42:01.704 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor 136 to 16. 02:42:01.704 --> 02:42:03.168 align:middle line:90% The clerk will call the roll. 02:42:03.168 --> 02:42:06.096 align:middle line:90% 02:42:06.096 --> 02:42:07.060 align:middle line:90% Barrett? 02:42:07.060 --> 02:42:07.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:07.560 --> 02:42:09.024 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:09.024 --> 02:42:10.000 align:middle line:90% Boncore? 02:42:10.000 --> 02:42:10.964 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:10.964 --> 02:42:11.464 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:11.464 --> 02:42:12.440 align:middle line:90% Brady? 02:42:12.440 --> 02:42:13.420 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:13.420 --> 02:42:14.920 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:14.920 --> 02:42:15.800 align:middle line:90% Brownsberger? 02:42:15.800 --> 02:42:16.300 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:16.300 --> 02:42:17.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:17.560 --> 02:42:18.130 align:middle line:90% Chandler? 02:42:18.130 --> 02:42:19.010 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:19.010 --> 02:42:20.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:20.450 --> 02:42:21.450 align:middle line:90% Chang-Diaz? 02:42:21.450 --> 02:42:22.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:22.450 --> 02:42:23.450 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:23.450 --> 02:42:24.445 align:middle line:90% Creem? 02:42:24.445 --> 02:42:24.945 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:24.945 --> 02:42:26.425 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:26.425 --> 02:42:26.925 align:middle line:90% Cyr? 02:42:26.925 --> 02:42:27.915 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:27.915 --> 02:42:28.905 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:28.905 --> 02:42:29.890 align:middle line:90% deMacedo? 02:42:29.890 --> 02:42:30.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:30.390 --> 02:42:31.380 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:31.380 --> 02:42:32.860 align:middle line:90% DiDomenico? 02:42:32.860 --> 02:42:33.360 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:33.360 --> 02:42:34.350 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:34.350 --> 02:42:35.335 align:middle line:90% Donoghue? 02:42:35.335 --> 02:42:35.835 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:35.835 --> 02:42:36.825 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:36.825 --> 02:42:38.305 align:middle line:90% Eldridge? 02:42:38.305 --> 02:42:38.805 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:38.805 --> 02:42:39.795 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:39.795 --> 02:42:40.785 align:middle line:90% Fattman? 02:42:40.785 --> 02:42:41.775 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:41.775 --> 02:42:42.765 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:42.765 --> 02:42:43.755 align:middle line:90% Forry? 02:42:43.755 --> 02:42:44.745 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:44.745 --> 02:42:45.735 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:45.735 --> 02:42:47.215 align:middle line:90% Friedman? 02:42:47.215 --> 02:42:47.715 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:47.715 --> 02:42:49.195 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:49.195 --> 02:42:49.695 align:middle line:90% Gobi? 02:42:49.695 --> 02:42:50.685 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:50.685 --> 02:42:51.675 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:51.675 --> 02:42:52.665 align:middle line:90% Hinds? 02:42:52.665 --> 02:42:54.145 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 02:42:54.145 --> 02:42:54.645 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:54.645 --> 02:42:55.145 align:middle line:90% Humason? 02:42:55.145 --> 02:42:56.625 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:56.625 --> 02:42:57.615 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:57.615 --> 02:42:58.600 align:middle line:90% Jehlen? 02:42:58.600 --> 02:42:59.100 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:42:59.100 --> 02:43:00.585 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:00.585 --> 02:43:01.570 align:middle line:90% Keenan? 02:43:01.570 --> 02:43:02.070 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:02.070 --> 02:43:03.055 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:03.055 --> 02:43:03.555 align:middle line:90% Lesser? 02:43:03.555 --> 02:43:05.040 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:05.040 --> 02:43:06.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:06.030 --> 02:43:07.020 align:middle line:90% Lewis? 02:43:07.020 --> 02:43:08.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:08.080 --> 02:43:09.080 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:09.080 --> 02:43:10.130 align:middle line:90% L'Italien? 02:43:10.130 --> 02:43:11.090 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:11.090 --> 02:43:12.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:12.030 --> 02:43:12.916 align:middle line:90% Lovely? 02:43:12.916 --> 02:43:13.768 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:13.768 --> 02:43:15.050 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:15.050 --> 02:43:15.550 align:middle line:90% McGee? 02:43:15.550 --> 02:43:16.490 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:16.490 --> 02:43:18.590 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:18.590 --> 02:43:19.530 align:middle line:90% Montigny? 02:43:19.530 --> 02:43:20.030 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:20.030 --> 02:43:20.970 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:20.970 --> 02:43:21.470 align:middle line:90% Moore? 02:43:21.470 --> 02:43:22.430 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:22.430 --> 02:43:23.390 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:23.390 --> 02:43:24.350 align:middle line:90% O'Connor? 02:43:24.350 --> 02:43:25.310 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:25.310 --> 02:43:26.280 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:26.280 --> 02:43:27.120 align:middle line:90% O'Connor Ives? 02:43:27.120 --> 02:43:27.990 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:27.990 --> 02:43:29.550 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:29.550 --> 02:43:30.542 align:middle line:90% Pacheco? 02:43:30.542 --> 02:43:31.042 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:31.042 --> 02:43:31.994 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:31.994 --> 02:43:32.922 align:middle line:90% Rodrigues? 02:43:32.922 --> 02:43:33.422 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:33.422 --> 02:43:34.374 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:34.374 --> 02:43:35.326 align:middle line:90% Ross? 02:43:35.326 --> 02:43:36.278 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:36.278 --> 02:43:37.480 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:37.480 --> 02:43:37.980 align:middle line:90% Rush? 02:43:37.980 --> 02:43:39.423 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:39.423 --> 02:43:40.385 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:40.385 --> 02:43:41.347 align:middle line:90% Spilka? 02:43:41.347 --> 02:43:42.290 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:42.290 --> 02:43:42.790 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:42.790 --> 02:43:44.233 align:middle line:90% Tarr? 02:43:44.233 --> 02:43:45.195 align:middle line:90% No. 02:43:45.195 --> 02:43:46.157 align:middle line:90% No. 02:43:46.157 --> 02:43:47.490 align:middle line:90% Timilty? 02:43:47.490 --> 02:43:48.398 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:48.398 --> 02:43:49.760 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:49.760 --> 02:43:50.560 align:middle line:90% Welch? 02:43:50.560 --> 02:43:51.060 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:51.060 --> 02:43:51.560 align:middle line:90% Yes. 02:43:51.560 --> 02:43:53.485 align:middle line:90% Have all members been recorded? 02:43:53.485 --> 02:44:03.185 align:middle line:90% 02:44:03.185 --> 02:44:05.150 align:middle line:84% 36 in the affirmative, one in the negative. 02:44:05.150 --> 02:44:07.690 align:middle line:84% On this matter, 36 having voted in the affirmative, 02:44:07.690 --> 02:44:08.990 align:middle line:90% one in the negative. 02:44:08.990 --> 02:44:10.480 align:middle line:84% The bill passes notwithstanding-- 02:44:10.480 --> 02:44:13.630 align:middle line:84% I'm sorry the matter stands, notwithstanding the objections 02:44:13.630 --> 02:44:16.052 align:middle line:84% of his excellency the governor to the contrary. 02:44:16.052 --> 02:44:18.010 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex and Middlesex, Mr. Tarr, 02:44:18.010 --> 02:44:20.370 align:middle line:84% moves that when the Senate adjourned today 02:44:20.370 --> 02:44:26.230 align:middle line:84% it do so in memory of Michelle Nowak of Middleton. 02:44:26.230 --> 02:44:29.460 align:middle line:84% Michelle Nowak of Middleton passed away on September 23rd, 02:44:29.460 --> 02:44:33.050 align:middle line:90% 2017 at the age of 54. 02:44:33.050 --> 02:44:36.410 align:middle line:84% Michelle Marie Nowak, beloved wife of Mark Nowak, 02:44:36.410 --> 02:44:39.050 align:middle line:84% served her community as a reserve police officer 02:44:39.050 --> 02:44:41.720 align:middle line:84% with the Boxford and Middleton police departments 02:44:41.720 --> 02:44:43.460 align:middle line:90% at the time of her death. 02:44:43.460 --> 02:44:46.310 align:middle line:84% Ms. Nowak was born in Salem and grew up in Beverley. 02:44:46.310 --> 02:44:49.220 align:middle line:84% She graduated Beverley high school in 1982 02:44:49.220 --> 02:44:52.250 align:middle line:84% and went on to further her education at Salem State 02:44:52.250 --> 02:44:53.180 align:middle line:90% College. 02:44:53.180 --> 02:44:55.040 align:middle line:84% After graduating college, Ms. Nowak 02:44:55.040 --> 02:44:57.020 align:middle line:84% pursued her passion for law enforcement 02:44:57.020 --> 02:45:00.410 align:middle line:84% by working in the Essex County Sheriff's Department. 02:45:00.410 --> 02:45:03.770 align:middle line:84% She took time off from her career to raise two children. 02:45:03.770 --> 02:45:05.750 align:middle line:84% After her children had grown, she 02:45:05.750 --> 02:45:08.090 align:middle line:84% returned to work as a reserve police officer 02:45:08.090 --> 02:45:12.650 align:middle line:84% with the town of Boxford police department in 2005, 02:45:12.650 --> 02:45:16.670 align:middle line:84% and later became the town's DARE officer in 2008. 02:45:16.670 --> 02:45:18.440 align:middle line:84% With her title of DARE officer she 02:45:18.440 --> 02:45:21.530 align:middle line:84% was able to teach children the negative effects of drugs 02:45:21.530 --> 02:45:25.280 align:middle line:84% and alcohol, something she found extremely important. 02:45:25.280 --> 02:45:28.890 align:middle line:84% She made such a profound impact on her community 02:45:28.890 --> 02:45:31.790 align:middle line:84% she was later appointed president of the Massachusetts 02:45:31.790 --> 02:45:34.040 align:middle line:90% DARE Association. 02:45:34.040 --> 02:45:36.710 align:middle line:84% Starting in 2007, Ms. Nowak began 02:45:36.710 --> 02:45:39.860 align:middle line:84% working as a reserve officer in the town of Middleton 02:45:39.860 --> 02:45:41.120 align:middle line:90% where she lived. 02:45:41.120 --> 02:45:42.770 align:middle line:84% Her involvement in both departments 02:45:42.770 --> 02:45:45.680 align:middle line:84% allowed her to impact the tri-town community 02:45:45.680 --> 02:45:47.510 align:middle line:90% in a memorable way. 02:45:47.510 --> 02:45:49.370 align:middle line:84% Ms. Nowak truly enjoyed your career 02:45:49.370 --> 02:45:52.580 align:middle line:84% and made a lasting impact on all around her. 02:45:52.580 --> 02:45:55.550 align:middle line:84% She took pride in her work and put significant effort 02:45:55.550 --> 02:46:01.640 align:middle line:84% into making her town safe for every one of their members. 02:46:01.640 --> 02:46:04.460 align:middle line:84% Her compassionate personality made her likeable 02:46:04.460 --> 02:46:05.900 align:middle line:90% and approachable. 02:46:05.900 --> 02:46:08.690 align:middle line:84% She was extremely respectful to her superiors 02:46:08.690 --> 02:46:10.790 align:middle line:84% and was fond of every individual she 02:46:10.790 --> 02:46:13.460 align:middle line:84% was able to work with over the years. 02:46:13.460 --> 02:46:15.950 align:middle line:84% Ms. Nowak put others before herself 02:46:15.950 --> 02:46:19.130 align:middle line:84% and strived to make both Boxford and Middleton better 02:46:19.130 --> 02:46:21.020 align:middle line:90% communities for all. 02:46:21.020 --> 02:46:23.120 align:middle line:84% An active member of her community, Ms. Nowak 02:46:23.120 --> 02:46:25.790 align:middle line:84% was a member of the recreation commission in the town 02:46:25.790 --> 02:46:27.870 align:middle line:90% of Middleton for many years. 02:46:27.870 --> 02:46:31.430 align:middle line:84% She was a devoted communicant to Saint Agnes church in Middleton 02:46:31.430 --> 02:46:32.570 align:middle line:90% as well. 02:46:32.570 --> 02:46:35.390 align:middle line:84% She enjoyed making a difference and playing an important role 02:46:35.390 --> 02:46:38.300 align:middle line:84% in her community, and she deeply cherished the bonds 02:46:38.300 --> 02:46:40.400 align:middle line:90% she had made over time. 02:46:40.400 --> 02:46:43.070 align:middle line:84% To Ms. Nowak, family always came first. 02:46:43.070 --> 02:46:46.190 align:middle line:84% She will always be remembered as a loving wife, mother, sister, 02:46:46.190 --> 02:46:47.270 align:middle line:90% and aunt. 02:46:47.270 --> 02:46:50.060 align:middle line:84% She had a love for the outdoors and spent as much time 02:46:50.060 --> 02:46:52.700 align:middle line:84% as she could fishing or snowmobiling 02:46:52.700 --> 02:46:54.740 align:middle line:90% with her wonderful family. 02:46:54.740 --> 02:46:57.950 align:middle line:84% Ms. Nowak spent her life caring for and protecting all those 02:46:57.950 --> 02:47:00.860 align:middle line:84% around her, including members of her community 02:47:00.860 --> 02:47:02.810 align:middle line:90% that she had never met before. 02:47:02.810 --> 02:47:05.540 align:middle line:84% She always had a welcoming smile on her face 02:47:05.540 --> 02:47:07.460 align:middle line:84% and could light up a room, and a heart 02:47:07.460 --> 02:47:11.230 align:middle line:84% so big it cared for everyone lucky enough to know her. 02:47:11.230 --> 02:47:14.060 align:middle line:84% Her unforgettable positive attitude, 02:47:14.060 --> 02:47:17.300 align:middle line:84% devotion to her career, and her zest for life 02:47:17.300 --> 02:47:19.370 align:middle line:90% will never be forgotten. 02:47:19.370 --> 02:47:22.880 align:middle line:84% She will be deeply missed and forever remembered. 02:47:22.880 --> 02:47:25.260 align:middle line:84% She is survived by her husband of 25 years, 02:47:25.260 --> 02:47:29.000 align:middle line:84% Mark Nowak of Middleton, her daughter Alice and Mary Nowak 02:47:29.000 --> 02:47:31.460 align:middle line:84% of Middleton, her son Christopher George 02:47:31.460 --> 02:47:35.450 align:middle line:84% Nowak of Middleton, her sister Marissa Mears of Salem, 02:47:35.450 --> 02:47:37.820 align:middle line:84% her brother Kevin O'Brien of Beverley, 02:47:37.820 --> 02:47:44.590 align:middle line:84% many loving family members, her fellow officers, and friends. 02:47:44.590 --> 02:47:46.000 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:47:46.000 --> 02:47:46.970 align:middle line:90% Aye. 02:47:46.970 --> 02:47:48.170 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:47:48.170 --> 02:47:50.407 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the motion prevails. 02:47:50.407 --> 02:47:53.886 align:middle line:84% The chair would ask for a moment of silent reflection. 02:47:53.886 --> 02:48:08.800 align:middle line:90% 02:48:08.800 --> 02:48:10.450 align:middle line:84% The senator from Essex, Mr. Tarr, 02:48:10.450 --> 02:48:13.309 align:middle line:84% offers an order which the clerk will read. 02:48:13.309 --> 02:48:15.100 align:middle line:84% Ordered that when the Senate adjourns today 02:48:15.100 --> 02:48:17.296 align:middle line:84% it adjourn to meet again on Monday next at 11:00 AM. 02:48:17.296 --> 02:48:19.420 align:middle line:84% The court be directed to dispense with the printing 02:48:19.420 --> 02:48:20.650 align:middle line:90% of a calendar. 02:48:20.650 --> 02:48:22.330 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 02:48:22.330 --> 02:48:23.870 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:48:23.870 --> 02:48:24.872 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:48:24.872 --> 02:48:25.580 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 02:48:25.580 --> 02:48:26.930 align:middle line:90% The order is adopted. 02:48:26.930 --> 02:48:31.450 align:middle line:84% The same senator now moves that the Senate adjourn. 02:48:31.450 --> 02:48:33.320 align:middle line:90% All those in favor, say aye. 02:48:33.320 --> 02:48:34.520 align:middle line:90% Opposed, no. 02:48:34.520 --> 02:48:36.940 align:middle line:84% The ayes have it and the Senate stands adjourned, 02:48:36.940 --> 02:48:41.110 align:middle line:84% in memory of Michelle Nowak and Charles Halliday "Bud" Dolan, 02:48:41.110 --> 02:48:44.170 align:middle line:84% to meet again on Monday next 15 11:00 AM 02:48:44.170 --> 02:48:46.920 align:middle line:90% in an informal session. 02:48:46.920 --> 02:48:51.030 align:middle line:90%