WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.367 align:middle line:90% [JAZZ MUSIC PLAYING] 00:00:03.367 --> 00:00:10.582 align:middle line:90% 00:00:10.582 --> 00:00:11.803 align:middle line:90% House will be in order. 00:00:11.803 --> 00:00:23.150 align:middle line:90% 00:00:23.150 --> 00:00:26.270 align:middle line:84% Mr. Silvia of Fall River moves that the House stand in recess 00:00:26.270 --> 00:00:28.430 align:middle line:90% until the hour of 2:15. 00:00:28.430 --> 00:00:30.180 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye; opposed, no. 00:00:30.180 --> 00:00:31.220 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 00:00:31.220 --> 00:00:36.530 align:middle line:84% House stands in recess until the hour of 2:30. 00:00:36.530 --> 00:00:39.730 align:middle line:84% The House now stands in recess until the hour of 2:30. 00:00:39.730 --> 00:00:47.215 align:middle line:90% 00:00:47.215 --> 00:00:50.708 align:middle line:90% [JAZZ MUSIC PLAYING] 00:00:50.708 --> 00:01:20.170 align:middle line:90% 00:01:20.170 --> 00:01:21.780 align:middle line:90% House will come to order. 00:01:21.780 --> 00:01:27.540 align:middle line:84% Chair has been informed that Senate 2251 comes-- 00:01:27.540 --> 00:01:32.004 align:middle line:84% being rightly and truly prepared, comes before us. 00:01:32.004 --> 00:01:34.170 align:middle line:84% Under the Constitution, a separate vote is required. 00:01:34.170 --> 00:01:37.830 align:middle line:90% 00:01:37.830 --> 00:01:43.020 align:middle line:84% House Senate 2251, an act establishing a sick leave bank 00:01:43.020 --> 00:01:47.340 align:middle line:84% for Linda Thernize-Williams, an employee of the Department 00:01:47.340 --> 00:01:49.810 align:middle line:90% of Transitional Assistance-- 00:01:49.810 --> 00:01:52.200 align:middle line:90% separate vote being required. 00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:55.590 align:middle line:84% All those in favor of an emergency preamble will stand. 00:01:55.590 --> 00:01:57.960 align:middle line:84% And the monitors will return the count. 00:01:57.960 --> 00:01:59.644 align:middle line:90% First division-- 00:01:59.644 --> 00:02:00.430 align:middle line:90% 10. 00:02:00.430 --> 00:02:00.930 align:middle line:90% 10. 00:02:00.930 --> 00:02:03.370 align:middle line:90% Second division-- 00:02:03.370 --> 00:02:03.870 align:middle line:90% 12. 00:02:03.870 --> 00:02:04.860 align:middle line:90% 12. 00:02:04.860 --> 00:02:07.470 align:middle line:90% Third division-- 3. 00:02:07.470 --> 00:02:10.370 align:middle line:90% Fourth division-- none. 00:02:10.370 --> 00:02:12.660 align:middle line:84% All those opposed-- first division, 0; 00:02:12.660 --> 00:02:14.730 align:middle line:84% second division, 0-- third division, 0; 00:02:14.730 --> 00:02:16.770 align:middle line:90% fourth division, 0. 00:02:16.770 --> 00:02:19.145 align:middle line:84% 25 have indicated in the affirmative, 00:02:19.145 --> 00:02:20.020 align:middle line:90% none in the negative. 00:02:20.020 --> 00:02:21.735 align:middle line:84% The emergency preamble is adopted. 00:02:21.735 --> 00:02:25.960 align:middle line:90% 00:02:25.960 --> 00:02:31.000 align:middle line:84% The House has been informed that House 4156 has changed 00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:34.300 align:middle line:84% and amended an act designating a certain bridge 00:02:34.300 --> 00:02:40.750 align:middle line:84% in the town of Lee as the Lou Drigrigoli Memorial 00:02:40.750 --> 00:02:43.390 align:middle line:84% Bridge comes before us for final passage. 00:02:43.390 --> 00:02:45.212 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye; opposed, no. 00:02:45.212 --> 00:02:45.920 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 00:02:45.920 --> 00:02:47.294 align:middle line:84% The bill is passed to be enacted. 00:02:47.294 --> 00:02:52.030 align:middle line:90% 00:02:52.030 --> 00:02:54.130 align:middle line:84% The following bill, being rightly prepared, 00:02:54.130 --> 00:02:55.950 align:middle line:84% comes before us for final passage. 00:02:55.950 --> 00:03:01.420 align:middle line:84% Senate 2014, an act relative to veterans' housing in the city 00:03:01.420 --> 00:03:03.670 align:middle line:90% known as the town of Agawam-- 00:03:03.670 --> 00:03:07.570 align:middle line:84% roll call being required, it will be called forthwith. 00:03:07.570 --> 00:03:09.550 align:middle line:84% Court officers will please summons the members 00:03:09.550 --> 00:03:12.670 align:middle line:84% and indicate to them that a roll call is in progress 00:03:12.670 --> 00:03:14.485 align:middle line:84% and will remain open for four minutes. 00:03:14.485 --> 00:04:25.560 align:middle line:90% 00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:29.360 align:middle line:84% Under Rule 49, a court officer will 00:04:29.360 --> 00:04:34.490 align:middle line:84% vote for Representative Miceli of Wilmington. 00:04:34.490 --> 00:04:36.380 align:middle line:84% And the clerk will make an announcement. 00:04:36.380 --> 00:04:40.310 align:middle line:84% The voting stations for Representatives Donato, Galvin, 00:04:40.310 --> 00:04:42.070 align:middle line:90% and Chris Walsh are locked. 00:04:42.070 --> 00:13:08.952 align:middle line:90% 00:13:08.952 --> 00:13:10.660 align:middle line:84% Have all members voted who wish to do so? 00:13:10.660 --> 00:13:11.650 align:middle line:90% Have all members voted? 00:13:11.650 --> 00:13:21.670 align:middle line:90% 00:13:21.670 --> 00:13:23.110 align:middle line:90% Time for voting has expired. 00:13:23.110 --> 00:13:30.990 align:middle line:90% 00:13:30.990 --> 00:13:33.700 align:middle line:84% 152 members in the affirmative, 0 in the negative-- the bill 00:13:33.700 --> 00:13:34.840 align:middle line:90% is passed to be enacted. 00:13:34.840 --> 00:14:28.370 align:middle line:90% 00:14:28.370 --> 00:14:31.170 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker from Cambridge, suspension of rule 47-- 00:14:31.170 --> 00:14:36.200 align:middle line:84% all those in favor, say aye; opposed, no. 00:14:36.200 --> 00:14:42.210 align:middle line:84% To take up calendar 338 on page 1, all those in favor 00:14:42.210 --> 00:14:43.170 align:middle line:90% say aye; opposed, no. 00:14:43.170 --> 00:14:43.940 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 00:14:43.940 --> 00:14:47.270 align:middle line:90% 00:14:47.270 --> 00:14:48.725 align:middle line:90% Rule is suspended. 00:14:48.725 --> 00:14:51.200 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 00:14:51.200 --> 00:14:53.150 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 00:14:53.150 --> 00:15:01.200 align:middle line:90% 00:15:01.200 --> 00:15:02.700 align:middle line:84% Members will please take their seats 00:15:02.700 --> 00:15:04.380 align:middle line:90% and subdue their conversations. 00:15:04.380 --> 00:15:29.720 align:middle line:90% 00:15:29.720 --> 00:15:33.450 align:middle line:84% The chair recognizes Mr. Decker of Cambridge. 00:15:33.450 --> 00:15:35.360 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. Speaker. 00:15:35.360 --> 00:15:36.710 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Mr. Speaker. 00:15:36.710 --> 00:15:39.100 align:middle line:84% I rise today to discuss the matters 00:15:39.100 --> 00:15:43.130 align:middle line:84% before us, House 4291, which is a series of rules that, 00:15:43.130 --> 00:15:45.950 align:middle line:84% hopefully adopted, will be game-changing for the state 00:15:45.950 --> 00:15:47.360 align:middle line:90% of Massachusetts. 00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:48.950 align:middle line:84% I first want to say thank you, Mr. 00:15:48.950 --> 00:15:51.052 align:middle line:84% Speaker, for taking the initiative 00:15:51.052 --> 00:15:52.760 align:middle line:84% and immediately understanding the breadth 00:15:52.760 --> 00:15:55.490 align:middle line:84% and the impacts of the issue before us today. 00:15:55.490 --> 00:15:58.520 align:middle line:84% Your leadership, once again, pioneers Massachusetts 00:15:58.520 --> 00:16:01.430 align:middle line:84% to be on the forefront of changing and redefining 00:16:01.430 --> 00:16:04.010 align:middle line:84% what it means for states to stand up and not 00:16:04.010 --> 00:16:07.370 align:middle line:84% tolerate sexual harassment or retaliation. 00:16:07.370 --> 00:16:09.620 align:middle line:84% You have created a number of pathways for us 00:16:09.620 --> 00:16:12.520 align:middle line:90% to deal with this today. 00:16:12.520 --> 00:16:15.550 align:middle line:84% The Speaker today brought in independent counsel 00:16:15.550 --> 00:16:19.030 align:middle line:84% to work closely with House council, members, and staff 00:16:19.030 --> 00:16:21.100 align:middle line:84% as we pioneer a new model of government which 00:16:21.100 --> 00:16:23.770 align:middle line:84% takes responsibility for proactively creating 00:16:23.770 --> 00:16:27.460 align:middle line:84% and ensuring safe environments for everyone in this building. 00:16:27.460 --> 00:16:29.800 align:middle line:84% What's different now is that not that we're simply 00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:33.460 align:middle line:84% dealing with what's right or wrong, 00:16:33.460 --> 00:16:36.580 align:middle line:84% but we're removing any ambiguity by establishing 00:16:36.580 --> 00:16:40.690 align:middle line:84% multiple opportunities for support and accountability. 00:16:40.690 --> 00:16:42.960 align:middle line:84% I want to thank especially House counsel 00:16:42.960 --> 00:16:46.260 align:middle line:84% for working so closely with advocates and independent law 00:16:46.260 --> 00:16:48.690 align:middle line:84% firms in both creating a process that 00:16:48.690 --> 00:16:51.750 align:middle line:90% was transparent and inclusive. 00:16:51.750 --> 00:16:54.200 align:middle line:84% It both looked forward to where we need to go, 00:16:54.200 --> 00:16:57.330 align:middle line:84% and it also examined the past, looking at documents 00:16:57.330 --> 00:16:59.400 align:middle line:84% and records, and ensuring that they are preserved 00:16:59.400 --> 00:17:02.350 align:middle line:90% if ever needed in the future. 00:17:02.350 --> 00:17:05.260 align:middle line:84% Outside counsel took a deep look, as well as an audit, 00:17:05.260 --> 00:17:08.260 align:middle line:84% of the HR department and offered recommendations 00:17:08.260 --> 00:17:10.930 align:middle line:90% for going forward. 00:17:10.930 --> 00:17:13.900 align:middle line:84% I really want to thank the members of our staff 00:17:13.900 --> 00:17:15.940 align:middle line:90% and for you, my colleagues. 00:17:15.940 --> 00:17:18.490 align:middle line:84% You really stepped up and weighed in on an issue that 00:17:18.490 --> 00:17:20.210 align:middle line:90% is important to all of you. 00:17:20.210 --> 00:17:22.510 align:middle line:84% And in weighing in through a process that 00:17:22.510 --> 00:17:27.160 align:middle line:84% was accessible and transparent, you spoke volumes 00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:29.530 align:middle line:84% about the values that are important to you 00:17:29.530 --> 00:17:31.750 align:middle line:84% and to your district, and really, about what's 00:17:31.750 --> 00:17:34.360 align:middle line:84% important in our House here, creating 00:17:34.360 --> 00:17:37.480 align:middle line:84% an environment where people feel empowered and safe to do 00:17:37.480 --> 00:17:37.990 align:middle line:90% their jobs. 00:17:37.990 --> 00:17:41.790 align:middle line:90% 00:17:41.790 --> 00:17:43.770 align:middle line:90% We took an honest assessment. 00:17:43.770 --> 00:17:46.740 align:middle line:84% And we reached out by listening to one another, 00:17:46.740 --> 00:17:50.094 align:middle line:84% by inviting people to come in to speak their truth. 00:17:50.094 --> 00:17:51.510 align:middle line:84% And today, we have the opportunity 00:17:51.510 --> 00:17:55.772 align:middle line:84% to vote favorably on new rules and new changes that, again-- 00:17:55.772 --> 00:17:58.230 align:middle line:84% I think this is something we really need to take pride in-- 00:17:58.230 --> 00:18:00.990 align:middle line:84% will put Massachusetts on the forefront 00:18:00.990 --> 00:18:03.180 align:middle line:84% of being a legislature that stands very 00:18:03.180 --> 00:18:06.180 align:middle line:84% clearly in understanding there will be consequences 00:18:06.180 --> 00:18:10.970 align:middle line:84% when members or staff violate the rules. 00:18:10.970 --> 00:18:14.690 align:middle line:84% Rule 88, once adopted, clearly defines 00:18:14.690 --> 00:18:17.300 align:middle line:84% discriminatory and sexual harassment. 00:18:17.300 --> 00:18:21.200 align:middle line:84% It establishes a policy which prohibits such harassment 00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:25.520 align:middle line:84% and members and employees from retaliating against each other 00:18:25.520 --> 00:18:30.140 align:middle line:84% when employees have made a complaint about harassment. 00:18:30.140 --> 00:18:34.970 align:middle line:84% Rule 89, once adopted, establishes a new position 00:18:34.970 --> 00:18:38.330 align:middle line:84% of Equal Employment Opportunity officer, 00:18:38.330 --> 00:18:41.120 align:middle line:90% referred to as the EEO officer. 00:18:41.120 --> 00:18:44.690 align:middle line:84% This job will require reviewing and investigating 00:18:44.690 --> 00:18:47.810 align:middle line:84% all complaints of harassment and retaliation 00:18:47.810 --> 00:18:51.480 align:middle line:84% and provide harassment training for members, employees, 00:18:51.480 --> 00:18:52.740 align:middle line:90% and interns. 00:18:52.740 --> 00:18:56.570 align:middle line:84% It's important to note that the EEO officer and the HR director 00:18:56.570 --> 00:18:59.550 align:middle line:90% will act autonomously. 00:18:59.550 --> 00:19:02.550 align:middle line:84% Rule 90, once adopted, clearly defines 00:19:02.550 --> 00:19:06.430 align:middle line:84% the duties and the authority of the Office of Human Resources. 00:19:06.430 --> 00:19:09.300 align:middle line:84% It standardizes hiring practices, including 00:19:09.300 --> 00:19:12.330 align:middle line:84% a standard application form, mandatory background 00:19:12.330 --> 00:19:15.870 align:middle line:84% and reference checks, and a standard offered letter. 00:19:15.870 --> 00:19:18.690 align:middle line:84% It requires the HR director to annually publish 00:19:18.690 --> 00:19:21.540 align:middle line:84% an employee handbook, a supervisor handbook, 00:19:21.540 --> 00:19:23.810 align:middle line:90% and an intern handbook. 00:19:23.810 --> 00:19:28.370 align:middle line:84% Rule 91, once adopted, establishes an HR web portal 00:19:28.370 --> 00:19:33.250 align:middle line:84% to provide information on human resource policies. 00:19:33.250 --> 00:19:37.090 align:middle line:84% Rule 92, once adopted, establishes the position 00:19:37.090 --> 00:19:39.640 align:middle line:84% of director of employee engagement. 00:19:39.640 --> 00:19:41.380 align:middle line:84% This position will work to engage 00:19:41.380 --> 00:19:43.430 align:middle line:84% a staff in professional development, 00:19:43.430 --> 00:19:45.550 align:middle line:84% provide opportunities for ongoing dialogue 00:19:45.550 --> 00:19:47.170 align:middle line:84% with one another, and will assist 00:19:47.170 --> 00:19:51.740 align:middle line:84% the committee on personnel and administration with duties. 00:19:51.740 --> 00:19:56.570 align:middle line:84% Rule 93, once adopted, creates a flexible reporting process 00:19:56.570 --> 00:19:59.660 align:middle line:84% for formal and informal complaints. 00:19:59.660 --> 00:20:03.020 align:middle line:84% It allows members, employees, and interns 00:20:03.020 --> 00:20:06.440 align:middle line:84% to report harassments to multiple points of contact, 00:20:06.440 --> 00:20:08.690 align:middle line:84% all of whom shall receive guidance and training 00:20:08.690 --> 00:20:11.300 align:middle line:90% from the EEO officer. 00:20:11.300 --> 00:20:13.880 align:middle line:84% It also allows third parties to report harassment 00:20:13.880 --> 00:20:15.920 align:middle line:90% to the EEO officer. 00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:19.550 align:middle line:84% All complaints of harassment referred to the EEO officer 00:20:19.550 --> 00:20:23.810 align:middle line:84% will be assessed and investigated. 00:20:23.810 --> 00:20:27.000 align:middle line:84% Rule 94, once adopted, outlines a series 00:20:27.000 --> 00:20:30.510 align:middle line:84% of steps that must be taken in all complaints. 00:20:30.510 --> 00:20:33.510 align:middle line:84% It establishes standard investigation procedures, 00:20:33.510 --> 00:20:35.880 align:middle line:84% including multiple interviewers trained 00:20:35.880 --> 00:20:38.040 align:middle line:90% in trauma-informed questions. 00:20:38.040 --> 00:20:41.490 align:middle line:84% Persons interviewed will receive a clear explanation 00:20:41.490 --> 00:20:45.990 align:middle line:84% of an investigatory process, including confidentiality, 00:20:45.990 --> 00:20:49.350 align:middle line:84% and provided with information for external resources. 00:20:49.350 --> 00:20:51.930 align:middle line:84% A summary report of findings and recommendations 00:20:51.930 --> 00:20:53.130 align:middle line:90% will be created. 00:20:53.130 --> 00:20:56.830 align:middle line:84% And the investigation will be confidential. 00:20:56.830 --> 00:20:59.860 align:middle line:84% Rule 95, once adopted, will address 00:20:59.860 --> 00:21:01.300 align:middle line:90% the issue of discipline. 00:21:01.300 --> 00:21:03.880 align:middle line:84% For employees who violate the policy, 00:21:03.880 --> 00:21:07.930 align:middle line:84% it authorizes the EEO officer to implement 00:21:07.930 --> 00:21:10.390 align:middle line:84% all disciplinary and remedial action as 00:21:10.390 --> 00:21:14.410 align:middle line:84% necessary and proportional under the circumstances. 00:21:14.410 --> 00:21:17.320 align:middle line:84% It also allows the EEO officer to notify 00:21:17.320 --> 00:21:19.570 align:middle line:84% the appointing authority of an employee 00:21:19.570 --> 00:21:21.460 align:middle line:90% who is being disciplined. 00:21:21.460 --> 00:21:23.560 align:middle line:84% For members who violate the policy, 00:21:23.560 --> 00:21:28.420 align:middle line:84% it authorizes the EEO officer to make recommendations 00:21:28.420 --> 00:21:30.280 align:middle line:84% of disciplinary and remedial action 00:21:30.280 --> 00:21:33.100 align:middle line:84% directly to the member, who may request 00:21:33.100 --> 00:21:34.960 align:middle line:84% that the Speaker and the minority leader 00:21:34.960 --> 00:21:37.780 align:middle line:84% form a special commission on professional conduct 00:21:37.780 --> 00:21:40.270 align:middle line:84% to review the recommended action. 00:21:40.270 --> 00:21:43.300 align:middle line:84% The member has 10 days to make that request. 00:21:43.300 --> 00:21:45.880 align:middle line:84% If the EEO officer's recommended discipline 00:21:45.880 --> 00:21:49.150 align:middle line:84% involves reprimand, censure, removal 00:21:49.150 --> 00:21:51.880 align:middle line:84% from chair and leadership, or expulsion, 00:21:51.880 --> 00:21:53.800 align:middle line:84% the Speaker and the minority leader 00:21:53.800 --> 00:21:56.590 align:middle line:84% are required to confidentiality and convene 00:21:56.590 --> 00:21:58.720 align:middle line:84% a special committee on professional conduct 00:21:58.720 --> 00:22:02.130 align:middle line:90% to review that recommendation. 00:22:02.130 --> 00:22:06.660 align:middle line:84% Rule 96-- once adopted, the details of the Special 00:22:06.660 --> 00:22:11.190 align:middle line:84% Committee on Professional Conduct-- 00:22:11.190 --> 00:22:14.250 align:middle line:84% the committee must be convened confidentially. 00:22:14.250 --> 00:22:17.940 align:middle line:84% If the EEO officer recommends reprimand, censure, 00:22:17.940 --> 00:22:20.220 align:middle line:84% removal from leadership, or expulsion, 00:22:20.220 --> 00:22:23.700 align:middle line:84% or a member request a review of the EEO officer's 00:22:23.700 --> 00:22:27.860 align:middle line:84% recommendations for private discipline or remedial action, 00:22:27.860 --> 00:22:30.140 align:middle line:84% the committee has the authority to independently 00:22:30.140 --> 00:22:33.300 align:middle line:84% investigate and recommend discipline of a member. 00:22:33.300 --> 00:22:35.660 align:middle line:84% The recommendations and report of the special committee 00:22:35.660 --> 00:22:39.170 align:middle line:84% remain confidential unless recommending 00:22:39.170 --> 00:22:43.070 align:middle line:84% reprimand, censure, removal from the leadership, or expulsion, 00:22:43.070 --> 00:22:45.110 align:middle line:84% in which case the committee is required 00:22:45.110 --> 00:22:50.030 align:middle line:84% to file a public report with the clerk for consideration 00:22:50.030 --> 00:22:53.230 align:middle line:90% by the full membership. 00:22:53.230 --> 00:22:57.670 align:middle line:84% Rule 97, once adopted, ensures that all the information 00:22:57.670 --> 00:23:02.200 align:middle line:84% be maintained confidentially to the fullest extent possible. 00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:05.530 align:middle line:84% It requires that the EEO officer and members 00:23:05.530 --> 00:23:07.810 align:middle line:84% of the Special Committee on Professional Conduct 00:23:07.810 --> 00:23:10.780 align:middle line:84% maintain confidentiality throughout the investigation 00:23:10.780 --> 00:23:14.920 align:middle line:84% process while authorizing sharing of information 00:23:14.920 --> 00:23:19.640 align:middle line:84% with other House officers in limited circumstances. 00:23:19.640 --> 00:23:23.180 align:middle line:84% Rule 98, once adopted, authorizes 00:23:23.180 --> 00:23:25.760 align:middle line:84% the EEO officer and their director 00:23:25.760 --> 00:23:29.590 align:middle line:84% to establish policies to implement these rules. 00:23:29.590 --> 00:23:34.120 align:middle line:84% Rule 99, once adopted, addresses moments of transition 00:23:34.120 --> 00:23:37.870 align:middle line:84% that provides the pending appointment of an EEO officer. 00:23:37.870 --> 00:23:39.550 align:middle line:84% Harassment complaints against members 00:23:39.550 --> 00:23:41.650 align:middle line:84% are to be referred to the Special Committee 00:23:41.650 --> 00:23:43.980 align:middle line:90% on Professional Conduct. 00:23:43.980 --> 00:23:46.650 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, once again, I want to thank you 00:23:46.650 --> 00:23:48.900 align:middle line:84% for the swift action you have taken 00:23:48.900 --> 00:23:52.240 align:middle line:84% and really forging a path for this to be possible. 00:23:52.240 --> 00:23:54.630 align:middle line:84% The immediate urgency that you brought to this issue 00:23:54.630 --> 00:23:57.712 align:middle line:84% and to this matter is one to be commended, and quite frankly, 00:23:57.712 --> 00:23:59.670 align:middle line:84% it's one that I feel really proud to stand here 00:23:59.670 --> 00:24:01.350 align:middle line:90% as a member of this body. 00:24:01.350 --> 00:24:04.846 align:middle line:84% And to my colleagues, again, I want to say to all of you, 00:24:04.846 --> 00:24:06.720 align:middle line:84% it feels really good to be part of a body who 00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:08.850 align:middle line:90% took this issue so seriously. 00:24:08.850 --> 00:24:12.480 align:middle line:84% To all of you who took time to attend a listening session, 00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:15.180 align:middle line:84% to offer your suggestions, your thoughts, who 00:24:15.180 --> 00:24:17.640 align:middle line:84% met with our House counsel or reached out 00:24:17.640 --> 00:24:20.280 align:middle line:84% to each other for additional support, you weighed in on this 00:24:20.280 --> 00:24:20.880 align:middle line:90% heavily. 00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:22.950 align:middle line:84% And you made it very clear how important 00:24:22.950 --> 00:24:25.890 align:middle line:84% it was that not only would the rules be clear, 00:24:25.890 --> 00:24:30.180 align:middle line:84% but the path to accountability was important to you, 00:24:30.180 --> 00:24:33.090 align:middle line:84% to your staff, and to young people who intern in our House 00:24:33.090 --> 00:24:35.100 align:middle line:90% every year. 00:24:35.100 --> 00:24:37.370 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, I want to say thank you. 00:24:37.370 --> 00:24:39.015 align:middle line:84% And I ask that when a roll be called, 00:24:39.015 --> 00:24:42.280 align:middle line:84% it be called by a roll of the yeas and the nays. 00:24:42.280 --> 00:24:43.916 align:middle line:84% Lady from Cambridge asked when a vote 00:24:43.916 --> 00:24:46.260 align:middle line:84% be taken, it be taken by a call of the yeas and nays. 00:24:46.260 --> 00:24:47.760 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE], please rise. 00:24:47.760 --> 00:24:49.800 align:middle line:90% First division-- 20. 00:24:49.800 --> 00:24:51.450 align:middle line:84% There being sufficient number having 00:24:51.450 --> 00:24:53.429 align:middle line:84% arisen when a vote is taken, it should be taken 00:24:53.429 --> 00:24:54.720 align:middle line:90% by a call of the yeas and nays. 00:24:54.720 --> 00:24:57.470 align:middle line:90% 00:24:57.470 --> 00:24:58.900 align:middle line:90% House will be in a brief recess. 00:24:58.900 --> 00:26:02.310 align:middle line:90% 00:26:02.310 --> 00:26:04.920 align:middle line:84% Ms. Malia of Boston asks unanimous consent 00:26:04.920 --> 00:26:06.710 align:middle line:84% to be reported on the previous roll call. 00:26:06.710 --> 00:26:07.840 align:middle line:90% Does chair hear objection? 00:26:07.840 --> 00:26:08.548 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 00:26:08.548 --> 00:26:11.080 align:middle line:90% 00:26:11.080 --> 00:26:13.590 align:middle line:84% Roll call number 314, Elizabeth Malia-- yes. 00:26:13.590 --> 00:26:23.985 align:middle line:90% 00:26:23.985 --> 00:26:27.450 align:middle line:90% [MUSIC PLAYING] 00:26:27.450 --> 00:26:57.150 align:middle line:90% 00:26:57.150 --> 00:26:58.710 align:middle line:90% House will come to order. 00:26:58.710 --> 00:27:10.150 align:middle line:90% 00:27:10.150 --> 00:27:11.824 align:middle line:90% The House will come to order. 00:27:11.824 --> 00:27:13.240 align:middle line:84% The chair will announce that there 00:27:13.240 --> 00:27:17.780 align:middle line:84% is a consolidated amendment available at the clerk's desk. 00:27:17.780 --> 00:27:20.370 align:middle line:90% 00:27:20.370 --> 00:27:22.020 align:middle line:84% And it's a consolidated amendment 00:27:22.020 --> 00:27:24.420 align:middle line:90% for amendments 1, 2, and 3. 00:27:24.420 --> 00:27:28.230 align:middle line:84% The chair will allow 15 minutes for the members who 00:27:28.230 --> 00:27:33.267 align:middle line:84% are interested to take a look at the consolidated amendment. 00:27:33.267 --> 00:27:34.600 align:middle line:90% House will be in a brief recess. 00:27:34.600 --> 00:28:04.041 align:middle line:90% 00:28:04.041 --> 00:28:07.534 align:middle line:90% [MUSIC PLAYING] 00:28:07.534 --> 00:28:26.999 align:middle line:90% 00:28:26.999 --> 00:28:28.040 align:middle line:90% House will come to order. 00:28:28.040 --> 00:28:31.720 align:middle line:90% 00:28:31.720 --> 00:28:33.400 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order, 00:28:33.400 --> 00:28:34.930 align:middle line:84% pending which the chair recognizes 00:28:34.930 --> 00:28:37.385 align:middle line:90% Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 00:28:37.385 --> 00:28:42.510 align:middle line:90% 00:28:42.510 --> 00:28:45.120 align:middle line:84% Ms. DiZoglio offers an amendment in the hands of the clerk. 00:28:45.120 --> 00:28:46.804 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 00:28:46.804 --> 00:28:52.410 align:middle line:90% 00:28:52.410 --> 00:28:54.900 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 2-- 00:28:54.900 --> 00:28:59.040 align:middle line:84% Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen moves to amend the order by adding 00:28:59.040 --> 00:29:00.500 align:middle line:90% the following rule, 100. 00:29:00.500 --> 00:29:02.700 align:middle line:84% The House shall not include non-disparagement 00:29:02.700 --> 00:29:03.552 align:middle line:90% and nondisclosure-- 00:29:03.552 --> 00:29:05.010 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 00:29:05.010 --> 00:29:06.880 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading of the amendment. 00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:08.130 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 00:29:08.130 --> 00:29:08.850 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 00:29:08.850 --> 00:29:10.683 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 00:29:10.683 --> 00:29:13.592 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 00:29:13.592 --> 00:29:16.050 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam Speaker, and, through you, to the members. 00:29:16.050 --> 00:29:20.590 align:middle line:90% 00:29:20.590 --> 00:29:23.380 align:middle line:84% Years ago, when I was a 26-year-old staffer working 00:29:23.380 --> 00:29:26.740 align:middle line:84% in this very House, I had the misfortune 00:29:26.740 --> 00:29:30.550 align:middle line:84% of having a conversation in this room one evening with a state 00:29:30.550 --> 00:29:33.610 align:middle line:84% representative during a party that the House leadership 00:29:33.610 --> 00:29:36.420 align:middle line:90% and staff were having. 00:29:36.420 --> 00:29:39.090 align:middle line:84% Dozens of people were in the Speaker's office, 00:29:39.090 --> 00:29:41.850 align:middle line:84% which is right back there through that door. 00:29:41.850 --> 00:29:43.860 align:middle line:84% Many of you here in this room were there, 00:29:43.860 --> 00:29:47.010 align:middle line:84% and many walking in and out of the Speaker's office 00:29:47.010 --> 00:29:50.310 align:middle line:84% through that very door and into this room during the party 00:29:50.310 --> 00:29:53.365 align:middle line:84% that I had attended that evening. 00:29:53.365 --> 00:29:55.240 align:middle line:84% Even though this room was open to everybody-- 00:29:55.240 --> 00:29:58.780 align:middle line:84% the door was open and people were walking to and from during 00:29:58.780 --> 00:30:01.540 align:middle line:84% the course of the entire evening-- 00:30:01.540 --> 00:30:05.130 align:middle line:84% a false rumor was started that implied something inappropriate 00:30:05.130 --> 00:30:07.540 align:middle line:90% had happened. 00:30:07.540 --> 00:30:09.250 align:middle line:84% A publicly announced investigation 00:30:09.250 --> 00:30:13.930 align:middle line:84% was then launched, all because of a rumor. 00:30:13.930 --> 00:30:17.260 align:middle line:84% The investigation took weeks and found 00:30:17.260 --> 00:30:23.499 align:middle line:84% no wrongdoing or inappropriate behavior had occurred. 00:30:23.499 --> 00:30:25.540 align:middle line:84% But by the time the findings of the investigation 00:30:25.540 --> 00:30:27.970 align:middle line:84% were released, rumors had already 00:30:27.970 --> 00:30:30.070 align:middle line:90% spread through the building. 00:30:30.070 --> 00:30:34.540 align:middle line:84% And people were constantly talking about me, and not 00:30:34.540 --> 00:30:36.760 align:middle line:90% in a good way. 00:30:36.760 --> 00:30:39.310 align:middle line:90% I'm going to leave it at that. 00:30:39.310 --> 00:30:41.680 align:middle line:84% Simply put, the rumors regarding my reputation 00:30:41.680 --> 00:30:44.610 align:middle line:84% had created a very hostile work environment. 00:30:44.610 --> 00:30:48.420 align:middle line:84% My boss at the time told me not to speak to the press 00:30:48.420 --> 00:30:52.930 align:middle line:84% or talk to anyone in the building about the matter. 00:30:52.930 --> 00:30:56.410 align:middle line:84% Needing to keep my job as a recent college grad 00:30:56.410 --> 00:30:59.800 align:middle line:84% with lots of bills to pay, I did what I was told-- 00:30:59.800 --> 00:31:05.230 align:middle line:84% kept my head down, did my work, kept quiet, and listened. 00:31:05.230 --> 00:31:08.920 align:middle line:84% And in my silence, there were jokes. 00:31:08.920 --> 00:31:13.540 align:middle line:84% And in my silence, there were assumptions, false assumptions. 00:31:13.540 --> 00:31:16.960 align:middle line:84% And in my silence, more and more false rumors occurred. 00:31:16.960 --> 00:31:20.030 align:middle line:90% 00:31:20.030 --> 00:31:22.520 align:middle line:84% I tried to do my job, hoping it would eventually be over 00:31:22.520 --> 00:31:24.590 align:middle line:84% and that some other story would come up 00:31:24.590 --> 00:31:26.750 align:middle line:84% that was more interesting than mine and that-- 00:31:26.750 --> 00:31:29.360 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 00:31:29.360 --> 00:31:30.745 align:middle line:90% Chair will be in a brief recess. 00:31:30.745 --> 00:32:15.160 align:middle line:90% 00:32:15.160 --> 00:32:17.182 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 00:32:17.182 --> 00:32:18.140 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 00:32:18.140 --> 00:32:20.840 align:middle line:84% I'm going to continue to tell my story because it does pertain 00:32:20.840 --> 00:32:22.910 align:middle line:90% to the issue at hand. 00:32:22.910 --> 00:32:25.550 align:middle line:84% It is an example of why we need to pass this amendment. 00:32:25.550 --> 00:32:29.720 align:middle line:84% It directly does pertain to the use of nondisclosure agreements 00:32:29.720 --> 00:32:31.310 align:middle line:90% in this building. 00:32:31.310 --> 00:32:33.860 align:middle line:84% And it is imperative that I tell my story in order 00:32:33.860 --> 00:32:40.960 align:middle line:84% to actively ask the members to support this amendment today, 00:32:40.960 --> 00:32:41.866 align:middle line:90% and I will continue. 00:32:41.866 --> 00:32:43.240 align:middle line:84% Thank you so much, Madam Speaker. 00:32:43.240 --> 00:32:50.440 align:middle line:90% 00:32:50.440 --> 00:32:52.630 align:middle line:84% I wanted things to eventually go back to normal. 00:32:52.630 --> 00:32:54.970 align:middle line:84% But it never went back to normal. 00:32:54.970 --> 00:32:57.220 align:middle line:84% My boss told me that I needed to look for another job 00:32:57.220 --> 00:33:00.910 align:middle line:84% because the rumors were too much for him to handle. 00:33:00.910 --> 00:33:03.040 align:middle line:84% I informed the Speaker's staff of the situation 00:33:03.040 --> 00:33:05.020 align:middle line:84% through a phone call and asked if they 00:33:05.020 --> 00:33:08.980 align:middle line:84% were able to help maybe with a temporary employment position 00:33:08.980 --> 00:33:10.714 align:middle line:84% until I could find a permanent position. 00:33:10.714 --> 00:33:12.130 align:middle line:84% And unfortunately, they said there 00:33:12.130 --> 00:33:14.900 align:middle line:90% was nothing they could do. 00:33:14.900 --> 00:33:17.330 align:middle line:84% Again, with no money, rent to pay, and a broken down car, 00:33:17.330 --> 00:33:19.730 align:middle line:84% I decided to settle and take the small severance 00:33:19.730 --> 00:33:21.200 align:middle line:90% pay that was offered. 00:33:21.200 --> 00:33:24.920 align:middle line:84% But on my way out the door, I was hit with another surprise. 00:33:24.920 --> 00:33:27.590 align:middle line:84% The Speaker's office would not release my six-week severance 00:33:27.590 --> 00:33:31.380 align:middle line:84% pay unless I signed a nondisclosure agreement, 00:33:31.380 --> 00:33:34.100 align:middle line:84% including a non-disparagement agreement that legally bound me 00:33:34.100 --> 00:33:36.170 align:middle line:84% from discussing what had happened 00:33:36.170 --> 00:33:40.310 align:middle line:84% and from criticizing any past, present, or future elected 00:33:40.310 --> 00:33:41.690 align:middle line:90% members of this House. 00:33:41.690 --> 00:33:47.740 align:middle line:90% 00:33:47.740 --> 00:33:50.800 align:middle line:84% I hesitated for days because I did not 00:33:50.800 --> 00:33:53.740 align:middle line:90% want to sign this document. 00:33:53.740 --> 00:33:55.160 align:middle line:84% With my money running out quickly, 00:33:55.160 --> 00:33:58.240 align:middle line:84% however, I didn't feel I had another option. 00:33:58.240 --> 00:34:00.775 align:middle line:90% So I signed under duress. 00:34:00.775 --> 00:34:03.280 align:middle line:90% 00:34:03.280 --> 00:34:08.460 align:middle line:84% Today, I decided to break this NDA not 00:34:08.460 --> 00:34:11.400 align:middle line:84% to help myself move forward from the event. 00:34:11.400 --> 00:34:16.449 align:middle line:84% I already did that a long time ago and came back to this House 00:34:16.449 --> 00:34:19.030 align:middle line:90% despite my wrongful dismissal. 00:34:19.030 --> 00:34:20.320 align:middle line:90% I moved on. 00:34:20.320 --> 00:34:25.020 align:middle line:84% I'm back here doing what I love, fighting for my district. 00:34:25.020 --> 00:34:29.620 align:middle line:84% I don't break this NDA to attack or accuse anyone. 00:34:29.620 --> 00:34:34.860 align:middle line:84% I'm not asking for more money or threatening a lawsuit. 00:34:34.860 --> 00:34:36.739 align:middle line:84% And I will even give the severance money back 00:34:36.739 --> 00:34:37.490 align:middle line:90% if I am asked. 00:34:37.490 --> 00:34:40.000 align:middle line:90% 00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:43.090 align:middle line:84% I just want this awful practice to stop. 00:34:43.090 --> 00:34:48.699 align:middle line:90% 00:34:48.699 --> 00:34:50.770 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, we might differ on our remembrance 00:34:50.770 --> 00:34:51.639 align:middle line:90% of past occurrences. 00:34:51.639 --> 00:34:55.659 align:middle line:84% But today, that is neither here, nor there. 00:34:55.659 --> 00:34:57.430 align:middle line:84% I'm not here to argue about the past. 00:34:57.430 --> 00:35:01.060 align:middle line:90% Today is about the future. 00:35:01.060 --> 00:35:04.850 align:middle line:84% And today, I am breaking my NDA because I found out 00:35:04.850 --> 00:35:08.060 align:middle line:84% that it's not just me who has been told to be quiet. 00:35:08.060 --> 00:35:11.080 align:middle line:84% I'm not the only one with this type of agreement. 00:35:11.080 --> 00:35:16.370 align:middle line:84% And my situation was nothing compared to what 00:35:16.370 --> 00:35:19.750 align:middle line:90% others may have experienced. 00:35:19.750 --> 00:35:22.909 align:middle line:84% I've recently heard that dozens of other people who 00:35:22.909 --> 00:35:24.700 align:middle line:84% have worked in the House of Representatives 00:35:24.700 --> 00:35:31.270 align:middle line:84% have signed NDAs and non-disparagements since 2009. 00:35:31.270 --> 00:35:35.830 align:middle line:84% As a state legislator now and knowing this information, 00:35:35.830 --> 00:35:38.940 align:middle line:84% and after having heard about all of the women and men 00:35:38.940 --> 00:35:42.530 align:middle line:84% through the last several years who have been victims, 00:35:42.530 --> 00:35:44.920 align:middle line:84% but who are afraid to come forward because of fear 00:35:44.920 --> 00:35:49.270 align:middle line:84% of political retaliation, damage to their reputation, 00:35:49.270 --> 00:35:51.460 align:middle line:84% inability to continue to work on Beacon 00:35:51.460 --> 00:35:57.650 align:middle line:84% Hill, and legal retaliation, it's 00:35:57.650 --> 00:36:03.260 align:middle line:84% my duty to come forward and say that this is wrong and will not 00:36:03.260 --> 00:36:04.220 align:middle line:90% be tolerated. 00:36:04.220 --> 00:36:07.202 align:middle line:90% 00:36:07.202 --> 00:36:08.196 align:middle line:90% Time's up. 00:36:08.196 --> 00:36:11.190 align:middle line:90% 00:36:11.190 --> 00:36:13.890 align:middle line:84% I'm deeply disappointed, Madam Speaker, that these are-- 00:36:13.890 --> 00:36:17.690 align:middle line:84% that it's been said that these agreements don't exist. 00:36:17.690 --> 00:36:21.240 align:middle line:90% It's clearly not true. 00:36:21.240 --> 00:36:23.550 align:middle line:84% But the technical reason why that's allowed to be said 00:36:23.550 --> 00:36:27.000 align:middle line:84% is because those responsible for requiring these NDAs 00:36:27.000 --> 00:36:29.460 align:middle line:84% in the past have been very careful in choosing 00:36:29.460 --> 00:36:34.050 align:middle line:84% not to document within the language of these agreements 00:36:34.050 --> 00:36:38.970 align:middle line:84% why certain employees have had to sign them. 00:36:38.970 --> 00:36:42.610 align:middle line:84% The process has been broken for a really long time. 00:36:42.610 --> 00:36:45.400 align:middle line:84% And I'm glad that the proper protocol 00:36:45.400 --> 00:36:49.330 align:middle line:84% is being examined in today's legislation before us today. 00:36:49.330 --> 00:36:52.270 align:middle line:84% And I do want to say thank you to our leadership team 00:36:52.270 --> 00:36:55.800 align:middle line:84% for their hard work on this bill. 00:36:55.800 --> 00:36:57.990 align:middle line:84% But we still have a bill presented to us 00:36:57.990 --> 00:37:00.310 align:middle line:84% that does not include adequate reforms 00:37:00.310 --> 00:37:05.569 align:middle line:84% on our use of NDAs and non-disparagement agreements. 00:37:05.569 --> 00:37:07.110 align:middle line:84% Apparently, the two amendments that I 00:37:07.110 --> 00:37:14.180 align:middle line:84% filed regarding this issue were consolidated by the Speaker 00:37:14.180 --> 00:37:15.470 align:middle line:90% with different language. 00:37:15.470 --> 00:37:19.080 align:middle line:84% And while there are some really good provisions 00:37:19.080 --> 00:37:22.380 align:middle line:84% that I'm thankful for in that consolidated amendment 00:37:22.380 --> 00:37:27.990 align:middle line:84% regarding sexual harassment in his rewritten vision 00:37:27.990 --> 00:37:31.400 align:middle line:84% of the amendment that I filed, I have 00:37:31.400 --> 00:37:33.680 align:middle line:84% to say that I fundamentally disagree 00:37:33.680 --> 00:37:36.140 align:middle line:84% with the language of the Speaker's version 00:37:36.140 --> 00:37:39.860 align:middle line:84% because it does not prevent the use of NDA 00:37:39.860 --> 00:37:42.350 align:middle line:84% and non-disparagements from continuing 00:37:42.350 --> 00:37:46.960 align:middle line:84% to be used in this House as it pertains to issues 00:37:46.960 --> 00:37:51.580 align:middle line:84% relative to general matters of harassment and discrimination 00:37:51.580 --> 00:37:54.110 align:middle line:90% in the workplace. 00:37:54.110 --> 00:37:57.770 align:middle line:84% This isn't just about sexual harassment today. 00:37:57.770 --> 00:38:02.220 align:middle line:90% What about the LGBTQ community? 00:38:02.220 --> 00:38:05.090 align:middle line:90% What about the disabled person? 00:38:05.090 --> 00:38:06.845 align:middle line:84% What about gender discrimination? 00:38:06.845 --> 00:38:09.470 align:middle line:84% And a lot of people said to me, well, 00:38:09.470 --> 00:38:11.510 align:middle line:84% your issue wasn't just sexual harassment. 00:38:11.510 --> 00:38:12.870 align:middle line:90% It was gender discrimination. 00:38:12.870 --> 00:38:14.869 align:middle line:84% Well, what if it was just gender discrimination? 00:38:14.869 --> 00:38:18.200 align:middle line:84% Would I be able to move on, or would I still receive an NDA? 00:38:18.200 --> 00:38:22.220 align:middle line:90% 00:38:22.220 --> 00:38:24.480 align:middle line:84% That's not included in the Speaker's rewritten version 00:38:24.480 --> 00:38:25.730 align:middle line:90% of the amendment that I filed. 00:38:25.730 --> 00:38:28.440 align:middle line:90% 00:38:28.440 --> 00:38:32.160 align:middle line:84% Also, people of the past being released from their NDAs-- 00:38:32.160 --> 00:38:36.210 align:middle line:84% I commend to the Speaker for allowing that to occur. 00:38:36.210 --> 00:38:38.070 align:middle line:90% I did file that amendment. 00:38:38.070 --> 00:38:40.110 align:middle line:84% However, my amendment allows for anybody 00:38:40.110 --> 00:38:43.010 align:middle line:84% who has an NDA for any reason regarding harassment 00:38:43.010 --> 00:38:44.760 align:middle line:84% or discrimination to come forward and have 00:38:44.760 --> 00:38:48.040 align:middle line:90% that NDA removed. 00:38:48.040 --> 00:38:53.970 align:middle line:90% 00:38:53.970 --> 00:38:56.250 align:middle line:84% Speaker's version, unfortunately, only includes 00:38:56.250 --> 00:38:57.330 align:middle line:90% sexual harassment. 00:38:57.330 --> 00:39:00.780 align:middle line:84% And again, I'm very grateful for that. 00:39:00.780 --> 00:39:02.770 align:middle line:90% I'm so grateful for that. 00:39:02.770 --> 00:39:06.030 align:middle line:90% But it's not enough. 00:39:06.030 --> 00:39:08.840 align:middle line:84% These silencing tactics have no place in this House. 00:39:08.840 --> 00:39:14.070 align:middle line:84% They cover up misdeeds by politicians and others. 00:39:14.070 --> 00:39:18.510 align:middle line:84% And they empower perpetrators to move from one victim 00:39:18.510 --> 00:39:19.900 align:middle line:90% to the next. 00:39:19.900 --> 00:39:22.620 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 00:39:22.620 --> 00:39:26.456 align:middle line:90% Please speak on the amendment. 00:39:26.456 --> 00:39:29.660 align:middle line:84% The use of NDAs, which my amendment 00:39:29.660 --> 00:39:33.230 align:middle line:84% looks to remove from the House of Representatives 00:39:33.230 --> 00:39:37.040 align:middle line:84% in this rules package today, is an abuse of power 00:39:37.040 --> 00:39:40.190 align:middle line:84% to force public employees to sign away their right 00:39:40.190 --> 00:39:43.720 align:middle line:90% to speak using taxpayer money. 00:39:43.720 --> 00:39:45.940 align:middle line:90% We are a public institution. 00:39:45.940 --> 00:39:49.400 align:middle line:84% I want to remind everybody of that. 00:39:49.400 --> 00:39:53.180 align:middle line:84% These are public tax dollars that 00:39:53.180 --> 00:39:57.620 align:middle line:84% are being used to silence people because they 00:39:57.620 --> 00:40:01.070 align:middle line:84% might be critical of public elected 00:40:01.070 --> 00:40:04.810 align:middle line:90% officials in this chamber. 00:40:04.810 --> 00:40:08.560 align:middle line:84% We should not be in the business of silencing our critics 00:40:08.560 --> 00:40:14.050 align:middle line:84% or covering up any harassing or discriminatory behavior, 00:40:14.050 --> 00:40:21.197 align:middle line:84% or even giving the appearance of doing so with public funds. 00:40:21.197 --> 00:40:23.749 align:middle line:90% 00:40:23.749 --> 00:40:24.790 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:40:24.790 --> 00:40:30.060 align:middle line:84% I hope my amendment is adopted and respectfully request 00:40:30.060 --> 00:40:32.310 align:middle line:84% that when a vote is taken, that it be taken 00:40:32.310 --> 00:40:35.730 align:middle line:90% by a call of the yeas and nays. 00:40:35.730 --> 00:40:37.430 align:middle line:90% Gentlelady asks that a-- 00:40:37.430 --> 00:40:39.480 align:middle line:84% that when the vote is taken, it be taken 00:40:39.480 --> 00:40:41.030 align:middle line:90% by a call of the yeas and nays. 00:40:41.030 --> 00:40:42.550 align:middle line:84% Those joining with her will stand. 00:40:42.550 --> 00:40:43.960 align:middle line:90% Monitors will return the count. 00:40:43.960 --> 00:40:46.810 align:middle line:90% First division-- 0. 00:40:46.810 --> 00:40:55.017 align:middle line:84% Second division-- sufficient number having arisen, 00:40:55.017 --> 00:40:56.600 align:middle line:84% when this matter is called, it will be 00:40:56.600 --> 00:40:58.760 align:middle line:90% called with the yeas and nays. 00:40:58.760 --> 00:41:02.966 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Peake of Provincetown. 00:41:02.966 --> 00:41:13.159 align:middle line:90% 00:41:13.159 --> 00:41:14.200 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:41:14.200 --> 00:41:16.790 align:middle line:90% 00:41:16.790 --> 00:41:20.850 align:middle line:84% I rise in opposition to this amendment. 00:41:20.850 --> 00:41:25.790 align:middle line:84% I speak here after the gentlelady from Methuen, 00:41:25.790 --> 00:41:29.990 align:middle line:90% sort of an inenviable task. 00:41:29.990 --> 00:41:33.860 align:middle line:84% And I listen carefully to her words. 00:41:33.860 --> 00:41:39.420 align:middle line:84% And I understand that for her, in her situation, 00:41:39.420 --> 00:41:44.290 align:middle line:84% a nondisclosure agreement was not the best path. 00:41:44.290 --> 00:41:48.690 align:middle line:84% However, what her amendment 2 seeks to do, 00:41:48.690 --> 00:41:51.780 align:middle line:84% and I will read it because it's very brief-- 00:41:51.780 --> 00:41:56.700 align:middle line:84% the House shall not include a non-disparagement or 00:41:56.700 --> 00:42:02.160 align:middle line:84% nondisclosure clause in any agreement. 00:42:02.160 --> 00:42:07.230 align:middle line:84% And I would offer to the members today that as we sit here 00:42:07.230 --> 00:42:14.010 align:middle line:84% on the 15th of March, the Ides of March, that we cannot, 00:42:14.010 --> 00:42:19.740 align:middle line:84% through a crystal ball or best intentions, mental telepathy, 00:42:19.740 --> 00:42:25.260 align:middle line:84% or any other way, presume to know what is going to be 00:42:25.260 --> 00:42:29.310 align:middle line:84% in the best interest of aggrieved parties moving 00:42:29.310 --> 00:42:31.470 align:middle line:90% forward. 00:42:31.470 --> 00:42:33.420 align:middle line:90% What we do know-- 00:42:33.420 --> 00:42:35.190 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 00:42:35.190 --> 00:42:36.166 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:42:36.166 --> 00:42:41.640 align:middle line:90% 00:42:41.640 --> 00:42:44.670 align:middle line:84% Does the gentlelady relinquish the floor? 00:42:44.670 --> 00:42:45.720 align:middle line:90% At this time, I do not. 00:42:45.720 --> 00:42:46.678 align:middle line:90% I feel the gentlelady-- 00:42:46.678 --> 00:42:47.190 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:42:47.190 --> 00:42:49.260 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:42:49.260 --> 00:42:50.250 align:middle line:90% The lady doesn't yield. 00:42:50.250 --> 00:42:52.500 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Peake Of Provincetown. 00:42:52.500 --> 00:42:53.580 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:42:53.580 --> 00:42:58.410 align:middle line:84% We cannot begin to know and understand what is going to be 00:42:58.410 --> 00:43:02.580 align:middle line:84% in the best interests of parties moving forward. 00:43:02.580 --> 00:43:07.680 align:middle line:84% What we do know is when the team assembled 00:43:07.680 --> 00:43:11.250 align:middle line:84% pursuant to the order passed by this body 00:43:11.250 --> 00:43:16.320 align:middle line:84% to develop the policy, which is in the form of the order 00:43:16.320 --> 00:43:22.260 align:middle line:84% before us today, 4291, when that team went on their listening 00:43:22.260 --> 00:43:27.120 align:middle line:84% tour, reached out to experts, talked with victims, 00:43:27.120 --> 00:43:31.020 align:middle line:84% advocacy groups, what consistently they 00:43:31.020 --> 00:43:35.160 align:middle line:84% heard, whether it was from people inside this body, 00:43:35.160 --> 00:43:37.320 align:middle line:84% people who work in this building, 00:43:37.320 --> 00:43:43.320 align:middle line:84% or experts from outside, is that the need for confidentiality 00:43:43.320 --> 00:43:47.040 align:middle line:84% and the availability of confidentiality 00:43:47.040 --> 00:43:50.970 align:middle line:84% is perhaps the single most important piece 00:43:50.970 --> 00:43:55.110 align:middle line:84% of having victims feel comfortable moving forward. 00:43:55.110 --> 00:43:58.260 align:middle line:84% And for some victims, that confidentiality-- 00:43:58.260 --> 00:44:03.120 align:middle line:84% it is their wish to have it exist not only during 00:44:03.120 --> 00:44:04.380 align:middle line:90% the investigation-- 00:44:04.380 --> 00:44:06.690 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 00:44:06.690 --> 00:44:10.270 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 00:44:10.270 --> 00:44:13.665 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:44:13.665 --> 00:44:14.635 align:middle line:90% I'll yield. 00:44:14.635 --> 00:44:21.910 align:middle line:90% 00:44:21.910 --> 00:44:25.920 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Cronin of Easton. 00:44:25.920 --> 00:44:35.650 align:middle line:90% 00:44:35.650 --> 00:44:39.160 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam Chair, and, through you, to the members. 00:44:39.160 --> 00:44:42.880 align:middle line:84% I rise in opposition to the amendment. 00:44:42.880 --> 00:44:43.900 align:middle line:90% I come here-- 00:44:43.900 --> 00:44:46.060 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:44:46.060 --> 00:44:48.688 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 00:44:48.688 --> 00:44:50.440 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:44:50.440 --> 00:44:51.760 align:middle line:90% You asked for a yield. 00:44:51.760 --> 00:44:55.000 align:middle line:84% And the gentlelady from Easton also wanted to speak. 00:44:55.000 --> 00:44:58.690 align:middle line:84% And she has not had any opportunity. 00:44:58.690 --> 00:45:04.550 align:middle line:84% When the lady yields, anyone can step into that spot. 00:45:04.550 --> 00:45:07.250 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Cronin of Easton. 00:45:07.250 --> 00:45:09.290 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:45:09.290 --> 00:45:12.710 align:middle line:84% I rise today in support of-- in opposition 00:45:12.710 --> 00:45:15.020 align:middle line:90% to the amendment before us. 00:45:15.020 --> 00:45:18.320 align:middle line:84% I rise today as a member of this body, 00:45:18.320 --> 00:45:23.960 align:middle line:84% as a mother of two daughters, and also as an attorney 00:45:23.960 --> 00:45:31.040 align:middle line:84% who has represented and mediated not tens, not 20, 00:45:31.040 --> 00:45:38.090 align:middle line:84% but hundreds of cases involving sexual abuse and harassment. 00:45:38.090 --> 00:45:41.900 align:middle line:90% Every case is individual. 00:45:41.900 --> 00:45:45.600 align:middle line:90% Every case is unique. 00:45:45.600 --> 00:45:50.480 align:middle line:90% There is no one size fits all. 00:45:50.480 --> 00:45:53.380 align:middle line:90% In my years of practicing law-- 00:45:53.380 --> 00:45:57.920 align:middle line:84% I have been a member of the bar since 1985-- 00:45:57.920 --> 00:46:02.990 align:middle line:84% the majority of my career has been spent representing 00:46:02.990 --> 00:46:06.440 align:middle line:90% all types of victims. 00:46:06.440 --> 00:46:10.570 align:middle line:84% It is their decision whether or not 00:46:10.570 --> 00:46:15.640 align:middle line:84% to undertake to signing one of these agreements. 00:46:15.640 --> 00:46:18.700 align:middle line:84% And for many of them, particularly 00:46:18.700 --> 00:46:23.440 align:middle line:84% in cases of sexual abuse or harassment, 00:46:23.440 --> 00:46:27.550 align:middle line:90% confidentiality is imperative. 00:46:27.550 --> 00:46:31.540 align:middle line:84% It is the utmost of importance to them. 00:46:31.540 --> 00:46:38.400 align:middle line:84% In our consolidated amendment, we have very carefully 00:46:38.400 --> 00:46:45.150 align:middle line:84% set forth a process where if a nondisclosure agreement is 00:46:45.150 --> 00:46:53.220 align:middle line:84% to be entered into, it is at the request of the alleged victim. 00:46:53.220 --> 00:46:56.820 align:middle line:84% We must give victims an opportunity 00:46:56.820 --> 00:47:01.180 align:middle line:84% to protect their own confidentiality. 00:47:01.180 --> 00:47:06.090 align:middle line:84% By taking a one-size-fits-all approach, 00:47:06.090 --> 00:47:10.070 align:middle line:84% although the gentlelady from Methuen may be very 00:47:10.070 --> 00:47:15.580 align:middle line:84% well-intentioned, she may be causing devastating effects 00:47:15.580 --> 00:47:18.610 align:middle line:90% to many victims out there. 00:47:18.610 --> 00:47:23.566 align:middle line:84% And for that reason, I ask that the amendment be defeated. 00:47:23.566 --> 00:47:25.430 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:47:25.430 --> 00:47:28.600 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Peake of Provincetown. 00:47:28.600 --> 00:47:30.250 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:47:30.250 --> 00:47:31.300 align:middle line:90% Chair apologizes. 00:47:31.300 --> 00:47:33.544 align:middle line:84% For which purpose does the gentle-- 00:47:33.544 --> 00:47:34.478 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:47:34.478 --> 00:47:37.280 align:middle line:90% 00:47:37.280 --> 00:47:38.950 align:middle line:90% Will the gentlelady yield? 00:47:38.950 --> 00:47:40.990 align:middle line:90% Not at this time, Madam Speaker. 00:47:40.990 --> 00:47:41.920 align:middle line:90% Not at this time. 00:47:41.920 --> 00:47:44.740 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:47:44.740 --> 00:47:46.700 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:47:46.700 --> 00:47:51.250 align:middle line:84% I, too, join the gentlelady from Easton in opposition 00:47:51.250 --> 00:47:54.532 align:middle line:90% to amendment number 2. 00:47:54.532 --> 00:47:56.740 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 00:47:56.740 --> 00:47:58.840 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 00:47:58.840 --> 00:48:00.600 align:middle line:90% Will the gentlelady yield? 00:48:00.600 --> 00:48:02.051 align:middle line:90% No, I will not. 00:48:02.051 --> 00:48:02.550 align:middle line:90% Sorry. 00:48:02.550 --> 00:48:03.780 align:middle line:90% The lady does not yield. 00:48:03.780 --> 00:48:06.649 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Peake of Provincetown. 00:48:06.649 --> 00:48:07.690 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 00:48:07.690 --> 00:48:10.560 align:middle line:84% I will try to finish my thought and my few brief sentences 00:48:10.560 --> 00:48:13.030 align:middle line:90% here. 00:48:13.030 --> 00:48:16.510 align:middle line:84% I think, for the reasons that I previously articulated prior 00:48:16.510 --> 00:48:20.110 align:middle line:84% to the interruptions, that we cannot have 00:48:20.110 --> 00:48:23.620 align:middle line:84% a one-size-fits-all, very strict, 00:48:23.620 --> 00:48:28.570 align:middle line:84% very narrow constricture on when-- 00:48:28.570 --> 00:48:31.750 align:middle line:84% in fact, the amendment says not at all-- 00:48:31.750 --> 00:48:34.210 align:middle line:90% confidentiality can be kept. 00:48:34.210 --> 00:48:38.140 align:middle line:84% That is not a path that I believe we want to go down. 00:48:38.140 --> 00:48:40.630 align:middle line:84% It is contrary to what victims advocates 00:48:40.630 --> 00:48:42.210 align:middle line:90% groups have talked about. 00:48:42.210 --> 00:48:44.590 align:middle line:84% It's contrary to the feedback received 00:48:44.590 --> 00:48:49.640 align:middle line:84% by the special group put together pursuant to our order. 00:48:49.640 --> 00:48:53.530 align:middle line:84% And it is contrary to what we have heard from the gentlelady 00:48:53.530 --> 00:48:57.610 align:middle line:84% from Easton, who is a esteemed member of the bar 00:48:57.610 --> 00:49:00.100 align:middle line:84% and the chair lady of our judiciary committee. 00:49:00.100 --> 00:49:02.890 align:middle line:84% So for all of those reasons, I ask the membership 00:49:02.890 --> 00:49:06.610 align:middle line:84% to join me in defeating amendment 2 so we 00:49:06.610 --> 00:49:10.550 align:middle line:84% can move forward and enact the consolidated amendment. 00:49:10.550 --> 00:49:12.140 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:49:12.140 --> 00:49:15.000 align:middle line:84% Roll call being required, roll call will be called forthwith. 00:49:15.000 --> 00:49:17.610 align:middle line:90% 00:49:17.610 --> 00:49:20.370 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Mr. Scaccia of Boston. 00:49:20.370 --> 00:49:30.200 align:middle line:90% 00:49:30.200 --> 00:49:35.520 align:middle line:84% Madam Speaker, I did not intend to speak on this issue. 00:49:35.520 --> 00:49:41.400 align:middle line:84% But what a charade, what an absolute charade. 00:49:41.400 --> 00:49:47.180 align:middle line:84% We have an audit before us that was approved last Friday. 00:49:47.180 --> 00:49:48.957 align:middle line:84% How many people were here last Friday? 00:49:48.957 --> 00:49:52.160 align:middle line:90% 00:49:52.160 --> 00:49:57.130 align:middle line:84% So we have a special order allowing 00:49:57.130 --> 00:50:00.010 align:middle line:84% consolidated amendments to a bill that 00:50:00.010 --> 00:50:02.320 align:middle line:90% only has a few amendments. 00:50:02.320 --> 00:50:07.020 align:middle line:84% I never seen that before in my life. 00:50:07.020 --> 00:50:12.470 align:middle line:84% But it gave somebody a chance to file the consolidated amendment 00:50:12.470 --> 00:50:15.276 align:middle line:84% before we took up any amendments. 00:50:15.276 --> 00:50:20.710 align:middle line:90% 00:50:20.710 --> 00:50:23.320 align:middle line:90% Mr. Speaker, where are you? 00:50:23.320 --> 00:50:26.110 align:middle line:90% 00:50:26.110 --> 00:50:28.360 align:middle line:90% Come out. 00:50:28.360 --> 00:50:32.440 align:middle line:84% Come out of your office and chair-- 00:50:32.440 --> 00:50:34.220 align:middle line:90% and chair this issue. 00:50:34.220 --> 00:50:37.610 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentleman at the microphone. 00:50:37.610 --> 00:50:40.572 align:middle line:84% He is not speaking on the amendment. 00:50:40.572 --> 00:50:45.550 align:middle line:84% Well, thank you, Madam Speaker, for telling me about that. 00:50:45.550 --> 00:50:47.530 align:middle line:90% I appreciate it. 00:50:47.530 --> 00:50:49.150 align:middle line:90% Madam Speaker, I don't-- 00:50:49.150 --> 00:50:51.490 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentleman at the microphone. 00:50:51.490 --> 00:50:53.952 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 00:50:53.952 --> 00:50:55.760 align:middle line:84% Will the gentleman yield for a moment? 00:50:55.760 --> 00:50:58.000 align:middle line:90% No, thank you. 00:50:58.000 --> 00:50:58.580 align:middle line:90% Sorry. 00:50:58.580 --> 00:51:00.610 align:middle line:90% The gentleman does not yield. 00:51:00.610 --> 00:51:03.850 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Mr. Scaccia of Boston. 00:51:03.850 --> 00:51:05.480 align:middle line:84% Madam Speaker, I just want to start off 00:51:05.480 --> 00:51:09.900 align:middle line:90% by saying I'm for this order. 00:51:09.900 --> 00:51:14.190 align:middle line:84% And I'm actually for the consolidated amendment. 00:51:14.190 --> 00:51:19.950 align:middle line:84% But I wish, I wish, you had given that young lady a chance 00:51:19.950 --> 00:51:24.570 align:middle line:84% to express her whole feelings on this issue 00:51:24.570 --> 00:51:27.550 align:middle line:90% without interruption. 00:51:27.550 --> 00:51:32.800 align:middle line:90% And Mr. Speaker, come on out. 00:51:32.800 --> 00:51:36.000 align:middle line:84% But it's so nice, Mr. Speaker, to know that-- 00:51:36.000 --> 00:51:40.340 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentleman at the microphone. 00:51:40.340 --> 00:51:42.820 align:middle line:84% Once again, I will remind you, you 00:51:42.820 --> 00:51:44.892 align:middle line:90% asked to speak on the amendment. 00:51:44.892 --> 00:51:48.260 align:middle line:90% 00:51:48.260 --> 00:51:50.821 align:middle line:84% Madam Speaker, I hope you're not going to silence me. 00:51:50.821 --> 00:51:53.530 align:middle line:90% 00:51:53.530 --> 00:52:00.200 align:middle line:84% However, again, this order was adopted last Friday, 00:52:00.200 --> 00:52:02.030 align:middle line:90% when no one was here. 00:52:02.030 --> 00:52:05.540 align:middle line:84% It's been giving special provisions 00:52:05.540 --> 00:52:09.080 align:middle line:84% so that you can, in fact, limit the debate 00:52:09.080 --> 00:52:11.472 align:middle line:90% by a consolidated amendment. 00:52:11.472 --> 00:52:18.890 align:middle line:90% 00:52:18.890 --> 00:52:22.910 align:middle line:84% I'm not an expert in non-disparagement agreements. 00:52:22.910 --> 00:52:26.030 align:middle line:90% They scare me. 00:52:26.030 --> 00:52:28.640 align:middle line:84% But I can understand the need for them. 00:52:28.640 --> 00:52:32.645 align:middle line:84% Madam Speaker, am I speaking on the amendment now? 00:52:32.645 --> 00:52:33.145 align:middle line:90% OK. 00:52:33.145 --> 00:52:37.030 align:middle line:90% 00:52:37.030 --> 00:52:44.450 align:middle line:84% But I am concerned that this is the first speaker in my life 00:52:44.450 --> 00:52:45.880 align:middle line:90% that has used this vehicle. 00:52:45.880 --> 00:52:49.170 align:middle line:90% 00:52:49.170 --> 00:52:53.470 align:middle line:84% I talked to three former speakers. 00:52:53.470 --> 00:52:55.870 align:middle line:84% And they never used this vehicle. 00:52:55.870 --> 00:52:58.560 align:middle line:90% 00:52:58.560 --> 00:53:02.380 align:middle line:84% The two before those three I couldn't 00:53:02.380 --> 00:53:05.940 align:middle line:90% talk to because they are dead. 00:53:05.940 --> 00:53:10.220 align:middle line:84% But this speaker has used this, and I 00:53:10.220 --> 00:53:15.880 align:middle line:84% don't know the total facts, around 33 times. 00:53:15.880 --> 00:53:24.160 align:middle line:84% And if he has used this vehicle, how much money, public monies, 00:53:24.160 --> 00:53:30.850 align:middle line:84% has he spent to silence 33 people? 00:53:30.850 --> 00:53:39.770 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, there's a great song by Simon and Garfunkel. 00:53:39.770 --> 00:53:42.755 align:middle line:84% And it's called "The Sound of Silence." 00:53:42.755 --> 00:53:45.260 align:middle line:90% 00:53:45.260 --> 00:53:50.890 align:middle line:84% And that's what's been happening in this chamber for too long. 00:53:50.890 --> 00:53:53.905 align:middle line:90% Silence dictates this chamber-- 00:53:53.905 --> 00:53:56.700 align:middle line:90% 00:53:56.700 --> 00:54:00.450 align:middle line:84% very difficult for a young lady who 00:54:00.450 --> 00:54:07.620 align:middle line:84% had to experience what happened to her many years 00:54:07.620 --> 00:54:17.950 align:middle line:84% to be onslaughted by a plethora of reps in this chamber. 00:54:17.950 --> 00:54:21.070 align:middle line:84% She's not going to win her amendment. 00:54:21.070 --> 00:54:25.560 align:middle line:84% She's not going to win her amendment at all. 00:54:25.560 --> 00:54:32.220 align:middle line:84% But it's a vehicle she chose to speak out as to what personally 00:54:32.220 --> 00:54:39.240 align:middle line:84% happened to her, and probably what has happened to many, many 00:54:39.240 --> 00:54:43.440 align:middle line:90% more people in this House. 00:54:43.440 --> 00:54:49.700 align:middle line:84% Now, I commend the committee that came up with this report. 00:54:49.700 --> 00:54:51.054 align:middle line:90% They did a heck of a job. 00:54:51.054 --> 00:54:53.920 align:middle line:90% 00:54:53.920 --> 00:54:55.873 align:middle line:90% But it took them seven years. 00:54:55.873 --> 00:54:59.190 align:middle line:90% 00:54:59.190 --> 00:55:03.170 align:middle line:84% Madam Speaker, you are not going to tell me 00:55:03.170 --> 00:55:06.710 align:middle line:84% that the Speaker of this House found out 00:55:06.710 --> 00:55:11.170 align:middle line:84% about this issue a couple of days. 00:55:11.170 --> 00:55:15.570 align:middle line:90% 00:55:15.570 --> 00:55:18.720 align:middle line:90% I've been around a while. 00:55:18.720 --> 00:55:23.320 align:middle line:84% And I heard it many, many, many, many years ago. 00:55:23.320 --> 00:55:25.680 align:middle line:84% And I think most of you, if you've 00:55:25.680 --> 00:55:30.450 align:middle line:84% been here more than a couple of terms, have heard this issue, 00:55:30.450 --> 00:55:31.590 align:middle line:90% too. 00:55:31.590 --> 00:55:34.790 align:middle line:90% It's not new. 00:55:34.790 --> 00:55:38.240 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, you knew about this issue. 00:55:38.240 --> 00:55:43.820 align:middle line:84% In fact, I'd like to find out, Madam Speaker, who 00:55:43.820 --> 00:55:47.780 align:middle line:90% prepared the document. 00:55:47.780 --> 00:55:50.750 align:middle line:84% Was it the chief counsel of this House? 00:55:50.750 --> 00:55:54.200 align:middle line:84% And if it were, you're going to tell me 00:55:54.200 --> 00:55:57.590 align:middle line:84% that the Speaker didn't know anything about it 00:55:57.590 --> 00:56:00.950 align:middle line:90% until "a couple of days ago"? 00:56:00.950 --> 00:56:02.550 align:middle line:90% Nonsense. 00:56:02.550 --> 00:56:03.390 align:middle line:90% Nonsense. 00:56:03.390 --> 00:56:07.280 align:middle line:90% It's not believable. 00:56:07.280 --> 00:56:10.430 align:middle line:84% "Hello, darkness, my dear friend. 00:56:10.430 --> 00:56:15.230 align:middle line:84% I've come to talk to you again because a vision softly 00:56:15.230 --> 00:56:20.190 align:middle line:84% creeping left its seeds while I was sleeping. 00:56:20.190 --> 00:56:23.570 align:middle line:84% And the vision that was planted in my brain 00:56:23.570 --> 00:56:30.610 align:middle line:84% still remains within the sound of silence." 00:56:30.610 --> 00:56:36.180 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speaker, you've been getting away for too long in this House 00:56:36.180 --> 00:56:38.960 align:middle line:90% with the sound of silence. 00:56:38.960 --> 00:56:40.973 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentleman rise? 00:56:40.973 --> 00:56:43.338 align:middle line:84% Point of parliamentary procedure, as he's not 00:56:43.338 --> 00:56:46.180 align:middle line:90% talking about the issue. 00:56:46.180 --> 00:56:49.540 align:middle line:84% The gentleman's point is well-taken. 00:56:49.540 --> 00:56:52.990 align:middle line:84% Please confine your remarks to the amendment. 00:56:52.990 --> 00:56:58.160 align:middle line:84% I'll try to stay with the issue, Madam Speaker. 00:56:58.160 --> 00:57:02.550 align:middle line:84% But I'll tell you what this House should do. 00:57:02.550 --> 00:57:09.220 align:middle line:84% They should call up the Attorney General of this commonwealth 00:57:09.220 --> 00:57:15.030 align:middle line:84% and let her find out and let her find out 00:57:15.030 --> 00:57:22.450 align:middle line:84% what happened in the past to bring about the present 00:57:22.450 --> 00:57:27.530 align:middle line:84% because this item didn't just pop up 00:57:27.530 --> 00:57:31.040 align:middle line:84% in the last couple of weeks or months. 00:57:31.040 --> 00:57:34.460 align:middle line:84% It's been here for a long, long time. 00:57:34.460 --> 00:57:41.980 align:middle line:84% And the culmination is now before us today. 00:57:41.980 --> 00:57:48.800 align:middle line:84% Once again, Madam Speaker, I'm going to vote for the bill. 00:57:48.800 --> 00:57:53.170 align:middle line:84% I'm going to vote for the consolidated amendment. 00:57:53.170 --> 00:58:04.110 align:middle line:84% But I'm gravely disappointed in the sound of silence 00:58:04.110 --> 00:58:06.440 align:middle line:90% from the Speaker of this House. 00:58:06.440 --> 00:58:08.060 align:middle line:84% I'm going to be up again because I 00:58:08.060 --> 00:58:13.700 align:middle line:84% want to read the rest of Simon and Garfunkel's "Sound 00:58:13.700 --> 00:58:15.230 align:middle line:90% of Silence." 00:58:15.230 --> 00:58:19.350 align:middle line:84% In fact, I think in a while, when I come back, 00:58:19.350 --> 00:58:20.960 align:middle line:84% I'll sing the whole thing for you. 00:58:20.960 --> 00:58:24.090 align:middle line:90% 00:58:24.090 --> 00:58:28.942 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Farley-Bouvier of Pittsfield. 00:58:28.942 --> 00:58:33.010 align:middle line:90% 00:58:33.010 --> 00:58:36.760 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. 00:58:36.760 --> 00:58:40.000 align:middle line:84% This is a tough day in the House of Representative. 00:58:40.000 --> 00:58:43.540 align:middle line:84% This is a tough subject to deal with. 00:58:43.540 --> 00:58:46.950 align:middle line:84% And I think the issue around this particular amendment 00:58:46.950 --> 00:58:50.580 align:middle line:90% could be the toughest of all. 00:58:50.580 --> 00:58:54.000 align:middle line:84% I have to say that I'm really proud of this body 00:58:54.000 --> 00:58:56.940 align:middle line:84% because we're not shying away from this subject, 00:58:56.940 --> 00:58:59.250 align:middle line:84% the general subject matter, and around 00:58:59.250 --> 00:59:01.291 align:middle line:90% this particular amendment. 00:59:01.291 --> 00:59:02.790 align:middle line:84% And I'm grateful for the work that's 00:59:02.790 --> 00:59:05.400 align:middle line:84% been done by the committee, by the working group that 00:59:05.400 --> 00:59:06.450 align:middle line:90% did this. 00:59:06.450 --> 00:59:08.610 align:middle line:84% I'm really grateful for the participation 00:59:08.610 --> 00:59:11.820 align:middle line:84% of the staff of the House and the members of this House 00:59:11.820 --> 00:59:14.580 align:middle line:84% because we made a better product because 00:59:14.580 --> 00:59:18.454 align:middle line:84% of the collective participation of all the people involved. 00:59:18.454 --> 00:59:21.440 align:middle line:90% 00:59:21.440 --> 00:59:24.850 align:middle line:84% And I have to say that I believe my colleague, 00:59:24.850 --> 00:59:31.960 align:middle line:84% the lady from Methuen, is an exceptionally brave woman. 00:59:31.960 --> 00:59:36.100 align:middle line:84% It's really hard to stand up here and know 00:59:36.100 --> 00:59:40.030 align:middle line:84% that the people around you are made very, very 00:59:40.030 --> 00:59:41.500 align:middle line:90% uncomfortable by your words. 00:59:41.500 --> 00:59:44.470 align:middle line:90% 00:59:44.470 --> 00:59:51.960 align:middle line:84% At the same time, I want to say that as a member of this House, 00:59:51.960 --> 00:59:56.010 align:middle line:84% I'm not just responsible for myself 00:59:56.010 --> 00:59:58.380 align:middle line:84% and what's happening in the present day. 00:59:58.380 --> 01:00:00.150 align:middle line:84% But as a member of this institution, 01:00:00.150 --> 01:00:02.760 align:middle line:84% we're responsible for what happened in the past 01:00:02.760 --> 01:00:05.940 align:middle line:90% and what happens in the future. 01:00:05.940 --> 01:00:08.580 align:middle line:84% And because of my role in that, I 01:00:08.580 --> 01:00:12.700 align:middle line:84% want to extend these words to my colleague 01:00:12.700 --> 01:00:18.860 align:middle line:84% from Methuen with a very heartfelt apology. 01:00:18.860 --> 01:00:23.650 align:middle line:84% I am very, very sorry for your experiences 01:00:23.650 --> 01:00:30.330 align:middle line:84% here in the past as a staff member of this institution. 01:00:30.330 --> 01:00:35.660 align:middle line:84% That being said, I do believe it's important for victims-- 01:00:35.660 --> 01:00:38.510 align:middle line:84% sexual harassment, sexual assault-- 01:00:38.510 --> 01:00:44.000 align:middle line:84% to have choices, to be able to be in control of what 01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.470 align:middle line:90% happens in their future. 01:00:47.470 --> 01:00:52.870 align:middle line:84% And for that reason, I will be voting against the underlying 01:00:52.870 --> 01:00:53.590 align:middle line:90% amendment. 01:00:53.590 --> 01:00:55.960 align:middle line:84% And I will be voting for the consolidated amendment. 01:00:55.960 --> 01:00:58.000 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. 01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:01.450 align:middle line:84% Roll call having been audited will be called forthwith. 01:01:01.450 --> 01:01:03.460 align:middle line:84% Court officers will please summon the members. 01:01:03.460 --> 01:01:06.730 align:middle line:84% Indicate to them that a roll call is in progress 01:01:06.730 --> 01:01:08.770 align:middle line:84% and will remain open for three minutes. 01:01:08.770 --> 01:02:11.350 align:middle line:90% 01:02:11.350 --> 01:02:14.100 align:middle line:84% The clerk will call Ms. Atkins of Concord. 01:02:14.100 --> 01:02:19.490 align:middle line:90% 01:02:19.490 --> 01:02:22.526 align:middle line:84% Ms. Atkins of Concord, answer as present. 01:02:22.526 --> 01:05:28.104 align:middle line:90% 01:05:28.104 --> 01:05:29.812 align:middle line:84% Have all members voted who wish to do so? 01:05:29.812 --> 01:05:33.970 align:middle line:90% 01:05:33.970 --> 01:05:35.410 align:middle line:90% Time for voting has expired. 01:05:35.410 --> 01:05:39.100 align:middle line:84% In this matter, 21 have voted in the affirmative and 131 01:05:39.100 --> 01:05:39.830 align:middle line:90% in the negative. 01:05:39.830 --> 01:05:41.038 align:middle line:90% The amendment is not adopted. 01:05:41.038 --> 01:05:44.100 align:middle line:90% 01:05:44.100 --> 01:05:46.827 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker offers a consolidated amendment 01:05:46.827 --> 01:05:47.910 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:05:47.910 --> 01:05:49.643 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:05:49.643 --> 01:05:56.890 align:middle line:90% 01:05:56.890 --> 01:06:03.040 align:middle line:84% Consolidated Amendment A-- amendments numbers 1 and 3 01:06:03.040 --> 01:06:04.850 align:middle line:84% have been included in this amendment. 01:06:04.850 --> 01:06:08.260 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker of Cambridge moves to amend the bill and the order 01:06:08.260 --> 01:06:12.670 align:middle line:84% by adding the following rule, 100. 01:06:12.670 --> 01:06:16.360 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:06:16.360 --> 01:06:18.610 align:middle line:84% will dispense of the further reading of the amendment. 01:06:18.610 --> 01:06:19.860 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:06:19.860 --> 01:06:21.370 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:06:21.370 --> 01:06:24.890 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Decker of Cambridge. 01:06:24.890 --> 01:06:25.870 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Chair. 01:06:25.870 --> 01:06:29.740 align:middle line:84% I rise here in support of the consolidated amendment. 01:06:29.740 --> 01:06:33.600 align:middle line:84% And I'd like to highlight a few things here. 01:06:33.600 --> 01:06:41.450 align:middle line:84% First, I want to say to my colleague, I hear your pain. 01:06:41.450 --> 01:06:46.360 align:middle line:84% You are clearly having an impact on where we stand today. 01:06:46.360 --> 01:06:48.650 align:middle line:90% You are fierce. 01:06:48.650 --> 01:06:51.230 align:middle line:90% You are brave. 01:06:51.230 --> 01:06:52.470 align:middle line:90% And I still believe that. 01:06:52.470 --> 01:06:56.520 align:middle line:84% With due respect, I disagree with taking away 01:06:56.520 --> 01:06:59.152 align:middle line:84% the option of a nondisclosure act for victims. 01:06:59.152 --> 01:07:01.920 align:middle line:90% 01:07:01.920 --> 01:07:05.040 align:middle line:84% I say that a few highlights of the consolidated amendment 01:07:05.040 --> 01:07:06.960 align:middle line:90% are important to take note of. 01:07:06.960 --> 01:07:11.490 align:middle line:84% One, it is important, as we've heard from victims, advocates, 01:07:11.490 --> 01:07:13.980 align:middle line:84% and organizations across the Commonwealth who 01:07:13.980 --> 01:07:15.360 align:middle line:90% have weighed in-- 01:07:15.360 --> 01:07:17.910 align:middle line:84% and to remind folks today that's-- what's before us is 01:07:17.910 --> 01:07:21.420 align:middle line:84% a bill on sexual harassment and retaliation. 01:07:21.420 --> 01:07:24.180 align:middle line:84% And we pulled together experts in the field 01:07:24.180 --> 01:07:26.700 align:middle line:84% of sexual harassment to weigh in on this 01:07:26.700 --> 01:07:29.850 align:middle line:84% while we listen to staff and members also 01:07:29.850 --> 01:07:32.380 align:middle line:90% share their concerns. 01:07:32.380 --> 01:07:36.960 align:middle line:84% What we heard over and over is the importance 01:07:36.960 --> 01:07:39.450 align:middle line:84% of giving victims the opportunity 01:07:39.450 --> 01:07:43.230 align:middle line:84% to believe that if they should choose confidentiality, 01:07:43.230 --> 01:07:46.830 align:middle line:84% that, in fact, that would be preserved for them. 01:07:46.830 --> 01:07:49.230 align:middle line:84% What the consolidated amendment allows 01:07:49.230 --> 01:07:53.860 align:middle line:84% is allows victims to choose a nondisclosure agreement. 01:07:53.860 --> 01:07:56.250 align:middle line:84% And so I stand here firmly in support 01:07:56.250 --> 01:07:58.950 align:middle line:84% of that right and empowering victims who 01:07:58.950 --> 01:08:02.880 align:middle line:84% should choose to want a nondisclosure agreement that 01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:05.290 align:middle line:90% allows them to come forward. 01:08:05.290 --> 01:08:08.870 align:middle line:84% And I think it's important that we keep that in mind. 01:08:08.870 --> 01:08:11.410 align:middle line:90% Few other things it does-- 01:08:11.410 --> 01:08:15.620 align:middle line:84% once this person chooses to want a nondisclosure agreement 01:08:15.620 --> 01:08:17.649 align:middle line:84% and it is written up, that person 01:08:17.649 --> 01:08:20.824 align:middle line:84% has 15 days to review that disclosure 01:08:20.824 --> 01:08:22.240 align:middle line:84% and to make sure that, in fact, it 01:08:22.240 --> 01:08:24.010 align:middle line:84% speaks to what they are comfortable with 01:08:24.010 --> 01:08:25.438 align:middle line:90% and what they want. 01:08:25.438 --> 01:08:28.300 align:middle line:90% 01:08:28.300 --> 01:08:32.020 align:middle line:84% There is a finite period on this nondisclosure. 01:08:32.020 --> 01:08:37.580 align:middle line:84% And it must be agreed upon prior to being signed. 01:08:37.580 --> 01:08:39.439 align:middle line:90% As is the law-- 01:08:39.439 --> 01:08:40.729 align:middle line:90% it is not change-- 01:08:40.729 --> 01:08:42.890 align:middle line:84% that a nondisclosure agreement does not 01:08:42.890 --> 01:08:46.189 align:middle line:84% prevent or stop or prohibit further investigations 01:08:46.189 --> 01:08:48.830 align:middle line:84% from occurring, whether that's internal to the House 01:08:48.830 --> 01:08:50.393 align:middle line:90% or outside of the House. 01:08:50.393 --> 01:08:53.160 align:middle line:90% 01:08:53.160 --> 01:08:56.740 align:middle line:90% This agreement, if chosen-- 01:08:56.740 --> 01:09:00.640 align:middle line:84% if the victim chooses to have this nondisclosure agreement, 01:09:00.640 --> 01:09:03.729 align:middle line:84% reviews it, and after 15 days decides it, in fact, speaks 01:09:03.729 --> 01:09:08.740 align:middle line:84% to what makes them feel comfortable and empowers them, 01:09:08.740 --> 01:09:11.439 align:middle line:84% this agreement has to be put in writing 01:09:11.439 --> 01:09:16.060 align:middle line:84% and signed and approved by both House counsel, the HR director, 01:09:16.060 --> 01:09:18.880 align:middle line:84% and the new position of the Equal Employment Opportunity 01:09:18.880 --> 01:09:21.200 align:middle line:90% office. 01:09:21.200 --> 01:09:26.399 align:middle line:84% I want to say that I can't speak to the past. 01:09:26.399 --> 01:09:30.090 align:middle line:84% What I can speak to is that the pain that we are seeing here 01:09:30.090 --> 01:09:36.729 align:middle line:84% today and the lack of clarity for people in our building, 01:09:36.729 --> 01:09:39.090 align:middle line:84% whether it's staff, members, or interns-- 01:09:39.090 --> 01:09:43.380 align:middle line:84% the lack of clarity as it relates to sexual harassment 01:09:43.380 --> 01:09:46.290 align:middle line:90% is no longer unclear. 01:09:46.290 --> 01:09:48.660 align:middle line:84% The Speaker has laid out a process that 01:09:48.660 --> 01:09:52.439 align:middle line:84% allows us to stand here today, and hopefully ready to vote 01:09:52.439 --> 01:09:55.140 align:middle line:90% on this, on House 4291. 01:09:55.140 --> 01:09:57.930 align:middle line:84% It will never be unclear to anyone. 01:09:57.930 --> 01:09:59.880 align:middle line:90% Time is up. 01:09:59.880 --> 01:10:02.450 align:middle line:84% And those behaviors that are so egregious-- 01:10:02.450 --> 01:10:04.200 align:middle line:84% it's never been a matter of whether or not 01:10:04.200 --> 01:10:05.908 align:middle line:84% it was understood to be egregious or not. 01:10:05.908 --> 01:10:07.740 align:middle line:84% I don't think anyone believes that. 01:10:07.740 --> 01:10:10.410 align:middle line:84% What is clear is that the House of Representatives 01:10:10.410 --> 01:10:12.870 align:middle line:84% in Massachusetts is taking a stand 01:10:12.870 --> 01:10:16.470 align:middle line:84% and says that anyone who feels that they have been harassed, 01:10:16.470 --> 01:10:19.210 align:middle line:84% your claim will be taken seriously. 01:10:19.210 --> 01:10:21.130 align:middle line:84% You will have multiple opportunities 01:10:21.130 --> 01:10:23.610 align:middle line:84% and different places to decide where you feel most 01:10:23.610 --> 01:10:26.550 align:middle line:90% comfortable in filing a claim. 01:10:26.550 --> 01:10:28.350 align:middle line:90% It will be investigated. 01:10:28.350 --> 01:10:31.170 align:middle line:90% There will be consequences. 01:10:31.170 --> 01:10:34.980 align:middle line:84% And for that, I believe where we stand today, moving forward, 01:10:34.980 --> 01:10:39.300 align:middle line:84% we should all feel really proud of. 01:10:39.300 --> 01:10:41.610 align:middle line:90% There is no tolerance. 01:10:41.610 --> 01:10:43.590 align:middle line:90% But there are now consequences. 01:10:43.590 --> 01:10:47.100 align:middle line:84% And there are now very clear opportunities 01:10:47.100 --> 01:10:52.420 align:middle line:84% to identify a path, to identify a path 01:10:52.420 --> 01:10:54.220 align:middle line:84% and to be able to identify the person who 01:10:54.220 --> 01:10:58.420 align:middle line:84% is inappropriately and egregiously harassing you 01:10:58.420 --> 01:11:00.640 align:middle line:84% in the context of sexual harassment. 01:11:00.640 --> 01:11:05.290 align:middle line:84% It is my strong hope that today, this consolidated amendment 01:11:05.290 --> 01:11:06.545 align:middle line:90% will be adopted. 01:11:06.545 --> 01:11:07.495 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:11:07.495 --> 01:11:08.445 align:middle line:90% House Speaker? 01:11:08.445 --> 01:11:11.080 align:middle line:90% 01:11:11.080 --> 01:11:12.840 align:middle line:84% --comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:11:12.840 --> 01:11:14.940 align:middle line:84% A roll call is required and will be called. 01:11:14.940 --> 01:11:16.395 align:middle line:90% House Speaker? 01:11:16.395 --> 01:11:19.305 align:middle line:90% House Speaker? 01:11:19.305 --> 01:11:22.750 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 01:11:22.750 --> 01:11:26.050 align:middle line:90% I would like to ask a question. 01:11:26.050 --> 01:11:27.995 align:middle line:84% Will the lady yield for a question? 01:11:27.995 --> 01:11:30.370 align:middle line:90% Yes. 01:11:30.370 --> 01:11:31.510 align:middle line:90% Lady will yield. 01:11:31.510 --> 01:11:34.720 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:11:34.720 --> 01:11:38.350 align:middle line:84% First and foremost, thank you so much to the gentlelady 01:11:38.350 --> 01:11:40.600 align:middle line:84% from Cambridge for her hard work on this. 01:11:40.600 --> 01:11:43.270 align:middle line:84% I very much value what you are doing. 01:11:43.270 --> 01:11:45.890 align:middle line:84% And I agree with a lot of what you said. 01:11:45.890 --> 01:11:50.470 align:middle line:84% I have a question regarding the use of NDAs 01:11:50.470 --> 01:11:55.840 align:middle line:84% as it pertains to allowing perpetrators 01:11:55.840 --> 01:11:59.730 align:middle line:90% to continue in their misdeeds. 01:11:59.730 --> 01:12:04.320 align:middle line:84% By silencing both parties, does this 01:12:04.320 --> 01:12:11.360 align:middle line:84% allow NDAs to be used to cover up the misdeeds of politicians 01:12:11.360 --> 01:12:14.210 align:middle line:84% in this room who might be sexually harassing 01:12:14.210 --> 01:12:16.240 align:middle line:90% employees in this House? 01:12:16.240 --> 01:12:19.253 align:middle line:84% Does it allow their misdeed to be hidden? 01:12:19.253 --> 01:12:23.110 align:middle line:90% 01:12:23.110 --> 01:12:25.616 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Decker of Cambridge. 01:12:25.616 --> 01:12:26.990 align:middle line:84% So I think it's important to note 01:12:26.990 --> 01:12:29.540 align:middle line:84% that the only time a nondisclosure agreement will 01:12:29.540 --> 01:12:33.050 align:middle line:84% occur is when the person who has been victimized is-- 01:12:33.050 --> 01:12:34.400 align:middle line:90% asks for one. 01:12:34.400 --> 01:12:36.230 align:middle line:84% And at this time, I think it is important 01:12:36.230 --> 01:12:39.345 align:middle line:84% that we are focused on empowering the victim for what 01:12:39.345 --> 01:12:40.220 align:middle line:90% it is that they want. 01:12:40.220 --> 01:12:45.740 align:middle line:84% And I want to be clear that I am taking the guidelines of victim 01:12:45.740 --> 01:12:48.410 align:middle line:84% advocates groups who have weighed heavily in on this. 01:12:48.410 --> 01:12:52.010 align:middle line:84% And I understand that today, we may disagree on this. 01:12:52.010 --> 01:12:55.730 align:middle line:84% But I don't believe we disagree about the pain 01:12:55.730 --> 01:13:01.050 align:middle line:84% or the incredible desire for accountability to take place. 01:13:01.050 --> 01:13:03.575 align:middle line:90% And so if a victim-- 01:13:03.575 --> 01:13:06.200 align:middle line:84% that is the only one who gets to choose the nondisclosure act-- 01:13:06.200 --> 01:13:10.610 align:middle line:84% if a victim chooses to want a nondisclosure act and feels 01:13:10.610 --> 01:13:15.740 align:middle line:84% they need that to empower them to come forward, then that's-- 01:13:15.740 --> 01:13:19.430 align:middle line:84% upon agreed-upon time, they agree upon what's in there-- 01:13:19.430 --> 01:13:22.600 align:middle line:84% that is what is being put forward. 01:13:22.600 --> 01:13:23.940 align:middle line:90% House Speaker? 01:13:23.940 --> 01:13:26.216 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 01:13:26.216 --> 01:13:28.450 align:middle line:90% Point of personal privilege. 01:13:28.450 --> 01:13:32.220 align:middle line:84% The lady will state her point of personal privilege. 01:13:32.220 --> 01:13:34.350 align:middle line:84% Thank you, again, to the gentlelady from Cambridge. 01:13:34.350 --> 01:13:36.510 align:middle line:84% I'm glad you have spoken to victims-- 01:13:36.510 --> 01:13:39.060 align:middle line:84% The lady is not stating a point of personal privilege. 01:13:39.060 --> 01:13:44.300 align:middle line:84% Please state your point of personal privilege. 01:13:44.300 --> 01:13:48.950 align:middle line:84% And I'm glad that you spoke to those victims groups. 01:13:48.950 --> 01:13:51.320 align:middle line:90% You are speaking to a victim. 01:13:51.320 --> 01:13:53.420 align:middle line:90% We are not talking about-- 01:13:53.420 --> 01:13:55.520 align:middle line:84% The chair apologizes to the gentlelady. 01:13:55.520 --> 01:13:58.985 align:middle line:84% But she is not stating a point of personal privilege. 01:13:58.985 --> 01:14:03.770 align:middle line:84% Please state a point of personal privilege. 01:14:03.770 --> 01:14:05.771 align:middle line:90% What purpose does the lady rise? 01:14:05.771 --> 01:14:09.040 align:middle line:84% I'd like to speak to the amendment. 01:14:09.040 --> 01:14:11.128 align:middle line:84% Does the lady at the microphone yield? 01:14:11.128 --> 01:14:12.760 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:14:12.760 --> 01:14:16.550 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 01:14:16.550 --> 01:14:19.640 align:middle line:84% Thank you very much to the gentlelady from Cambridge 01:14:19.640 --> 01:14:23.039 align:middle line:84% for allowing me to speak on this amendment. 01:14:23.039 --> 01:14:31.260 align:middle line:90% 01:14:31.260 --> 01:14:34.132 align:middle line:84% I'm taking a breath because I've been trying to speak 01:14:34.132 --> 01:14:35.090 align:middle line:90% for a little while now. 01:14:35.090 --> 01:14:42.090 align:middle line:84% And it's been a little bit difficult. 01:14:42.090 --> 01:14:49.000 align:middle line:84% I want to point out that the chairwoman said 01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:50.900 align:middle line:90% the victim has the choice. 01:14:50.900 --> 01:14:53.750 align:middle line:90% 01:14:53.750 --> 01:14:56.180 align:middle line:90% I agree with that. 01:14:56.180 --> 01:15:01.600 align:middle line:84% That is the point I have been trying to make today. 01:15:01.600 --> 01:15:04.680 align:middle line:90% 01:15:04.680 --> 01:15:10.230 align:middle line:84% Forcing nondisclosures on any victim 01:15:10.230 --> 01:15:14.580 align:middle line:84% of harassment or discrimination or any employee of this House 01:15:14.580 --> 01:15:21.740 align:middle line:84% as a term that is mandatory to receive their severance package 01:15:21.740 --> 01:15:23.635 align:middle line:90% is unconscionable! 01:15:23.635 --> 01:15:28.390 align:middle line:90% 01:15:28.390 --> 01:15:31.680 align:middle line:84% I want to protect the victims, as well, Madam Chair. 01:15:31.680 --> 01:15:32.610 align:middle line:90% I am with you on-- 01:15:32.610 --> 01:15:35.890 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 01:15:35.890 --> 01:15:36.700 align:middle line:90% For what purpose? 01:15:36.700 --> 01:15:39.580 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:15:39.580 --> 01:15:41.712 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 01:15:41.712 --> 01:15:44.604 align:middle line:90% I rise because [INAUDIBLE]. 01:15:44.604 --> 01:15:47.014 align:middle line:90% Will the lady yield? 01:15:47.014 --> 01:15:48.460 align:middle line:90% Will the lady yield? 01:15:48.460 --> 01:15:51.840 align:middle line:90% 01:15:51.840 --> 01:15:54.690 align:middle line:84% Will I be allowed to speak again if I yield the floor this time, 01:15:54.690 --> 01:15:56.130 align:middle line:90% Madam Chair? 01:15:56.130 --> 01:15:57.015 align:middle line:90% Does the lady yield? 01:15:57.015 --> 01:16:00.670 align:middle line:90% 01:16:00.670 --> 01:16:02.060 align:middle line:90% No, I do not yield. 01:16:02.060 --> 01:16:06.076 align:middle line:90% Sorry, the lady does not yield. 01:16:06.076 --> 01:16:07.000 align:middle line:90% Oh, I'm sorry. 01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:09.470 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 01:16:09.470 --> 01:16:10.970 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:16:10.970 --> 01:16:12.890 align:middle line:90% Madam Chair, I apologize. 01:16:12.890 --> 01:16:14.460 align:middle line:90% I would normally yield to you. 01:16:14.460 --> 01:16:18.030 align:middle line:84% But I'm not sure that I won't be silenced again 01:16:18.030 --> 01:16:19.200 align:middle line:90% by Madam Speaker. 01:16:19.200 --> 01:16:24.320 align:middle line:90% 01:16:24.320 --> 01:16:26.690 align:middle line:84% I am going to support this amendment. 01:16:26.690 --> 01:16:29.000 align:middle line:90% Let me say that. 01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:33.890 align:middle line:84% You have my vote because we are making tremendous progress 01:16:33.890 --> 01:16:36.500 align:middle line:84% by including this amendment today. 01:16:36.500 --> 01:16:39.750 align:middle line:84% And I am so grateful that we're doing it. 01:16:39.750 --> 01:16:42.050 align:middle line:84% I'm grateful to the work of the chair, everybody 01:16:42.050 --> 01:16:44.820 align:middle line:84% on the committee, everybody in this chamber. 01:16:44.820 --> 01:16:46.700 align:middle line:84% We can respectfully agree to disagree 01:16:46.700 --> 01:16:47.882 align:middle line:90% on some of the nuances. 01:16:47.882 --> 01:16:51.990 align:middle line:90% 01:16:51.990 --> 01:16:55.861 align:middle line:84% I'm not demanding that everything I ask be passed. 01:16:55.861 --> 01:16:59.060 align:middle line:90% 01:16:59.060 --> 01:17:03.280 align:middle line:84% I'm simply saying let's think about in this amendment, 01:17:03.280 --> 01:17:09.300 align:middle line:84% if you will so kindly consider, at a bare minimum, 01:17:09.300 --> 01:17:12.150 align:middle line:84% at least expanding this, which is 01:17:12.150 --> 01:17:14.055 align:middle line:84% the purpose of the original amendment 01:17:14.055 --> 01:17:15.180 align:middle line:90% that I put up on the floor. 01:17:15.180 --> 01:17:16.110 align:middle line:90% And you know what? 01:17:16.110 --> 01:17:17.850 align:middle line:90% I'm not a lawyer. 01:17:17.850 --> 01:17:20.430 align:middle line:84% Maybe the intention of the amendment that I filed 01:17:20.430 --> 01:17:23.997 align:middle line:84% wasn't exactly legally the way that it 01:17:23.997 --> 01:17:27.196 align:middle line:90% was supposed to be written. 01:17:27.196 --> 01:17:30.829 align:middle line:84% I had to go to Jim Kennedy to ask him to draft my amendment. 01:17:30.829 --> 01:17:32.370 align:middle line:84% The Speaker's version that he drafted 01:17:32.370 --> 01:17:37.390 align:middle line:84% was a little bit more detailed than the one that I got. 01:17:37.390 --> 01:17:44.770 align:middle line:84% So I'm asking, is it possible that since we're 01:17:44.770 --> 01:17:52.950 align:middle line:84% so against not forcing victims of discrimination 01:17:52.950 --> 01:18:01.340 align:middle line:84% and harassment across the board based on gender, race, 01:18:01.340 --> 01:18:05.320 align:middle line:84% disabilities, and all sorts of other issues 01:18:05.320 --> 01:18:07.030 align:middle line:84% that don't pertain to sexual harassment-- 01:18:07.030 --> 01:18:08.696 align:middle line:84% we are debating the rules package today. 01:18:08.696 --> 01:18:12.680 align:middle line:90% 01:18:12.680 --> 01:18:13.700 align:middle line:90% Is it possible that we-- 01:18:13.700 --> 01:18:15.900 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the lady at the microphone. 01:18:15.900 --> 01:18:19.136 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the gentlelady rise? 01:18:19.136 --> 01:18:20.132 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:18:20.132 --> 01:18:26.620 align:middle line:90% 01:18:26.620 --> 01:18:27.370 align:middle line:90% I apologize. 01:18:27.370 --> 01:18:29.560 align:middle line:90% I will not yield at this time. 01:18:29.560 --> 01:18:31.660 align:middle line:90% Sorry, the lady does not yield. 01:18:31.660 --> 01:18:34.750 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. DiZoglio of Methuen. 01:18:34.750 --> 01:18:39.580 align:middle line:84% Is it possible that we can expand 01:18:39.580 --> 01:18:43.400 align:middle line:90% the scope of this legislation? 01:18:43.400 --> 01:18:46.910 align:middle line:84% Is it possible that we can take a brief recess 01:18:46.910 --> 01:18:53.240 align:middle line:84% and discuss this like adults and stop 01:18:53.240 --> 01:18:55.240 align:middle line:84% silencing the argument for people who might 01:18:55.240 --> 01:18:57.210 align:middle line:90% have an opposing viewpoint? 01:18:57.210 --> 01:18:59.210 align:middle line:84% I know that we're so used to that in this House. 01:18:59.210 --> 01:19:02.050 align:middle line:90% 01:19:02.050 --> 01:19:06.610 align:middle line:84% Is it possible that we can take maybe a brief recess 01:19:06.610 --> 01:19:09.730 align:middle line:84% and talk about expanding the scope of this amendment 01:19:09.730 --> 01:19:14.050 align:middle line:84% to include other victims of harassment and discrimination 01:19:14.050 --> 01:19:18.250 align:middle line:84% beyond sexual harassment, because there are 01:19:18.250 --> 01:19:22.510 align:middle line:84% a lot of people, Madam Chair, in this building who have suffered 01:19:22.510 --> 01:19:27.330 align:middle line:84% discrimination and been harassed, 01:19:27.330 --> 01:19:31.670 align:middle line:84% that it wasn't sexual in nature, like mine was. 01:19:31.670 --> 01:19:33.849 align:middle line:84% And again, mine wasn't even that bad. 01:19:33.849 --> 01:19:35.390 align:middle line:84% I don't consider mine to be that bad, 01:19:35.390 --> 01:19:37.139 align:middle line:84% not in comparison with some of the stories 01:19:37.139 --> 01:19:40.416 align:middle line:84% that I've heard from people who are afraid to come forward 01:19:40.416 --> 01:19:42.290 align:middle line:84% because they're probably going to be silenced 01:19:42.290 --> 01:19:47.750 align:middle line:84% the way that I've been silenced this very day in this chamber. 01:19:47.750 --> 01:19:50.000 align:middle line:84% This is the example we're setting 01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:56.420 align:middle line:84% to victims who have experienced awful, unspeakable situations 01:19:56.420 --> 01:19:58.733 align:middle line:84% by members and employees of this House. 01:19:58.733 --> 01:20:01.551 align:middle line:90% 01:20:01.551 --> 01:20:03.800 align:middle line:84% I think we deserve the right to have a little bit more 01:20:03.800 --> 01:20:07.640 align:middle line:84% of a discussion on this and not rush through this because we 01:20:07.640 --> 01:20:09.262 align:middle line:84% don't want to talk about it anymore. 01:20:09.262 --> 01:20:10.226 align:middle line:90% Time's up! 01:20:10.226 --> 01:20:14.090 align:middle line:90% 01:20:14.090 --> 01:20:15.650 align:middle line:90% Let's have this conversation. 01:20:15.650 --> 01:20:18.830 align:middle line:84% I am willing to have this discussion. 01:20:18.830 --> 01:20:23.040 align:middle line:90% I'm not making demands. 01:20:23.040 --> 01:20:26.920 align:middle line:84% I'm not saying it's awful, what you're trying to do. 01:20:26.920 --> 01:20:29.670 align:middle line:84% It's a great step in the right direction. 01:20:29.670 --> 01:20:33.770 align:middle line:84% But I would like to see a little bit more. 01:20:33.770 --> 01:20:36.070 align:middle line:84% And after coming out and exposing that this is even 01:20:36.070 --> 01:20:40.300 align:middle line:84% going on, I think you can afford me 01:20:40.300 --> 01:20:43.360 align:middle line:84% at least that little privilege of having 01:20:43.360 --> 01:20:46.240 align:middle line:84% this conversation with you and trying to expand some 01:20:46.240 --> 01:20:50.260 align:middle line:90% of the scope of this amendment. 01:20:50.260 --> 01:20:53.000 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:56.249 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Decker of Cambridge. 01:20:56.249 --> 01:20:57.290 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:20:57.290 --> 01:21:00.320 align:middle line:84% Again, I rise in support of the consolidated amendment. 01:21:00.320 --> 01:21:02.690 align:middle line:84% I want to be clear that the rules before us 01:21:02.690 --> 01:21:06.260 align:middle line:84% and the bill before us is explicit to sexual harassment 01:21:06.260 --> 01:21:07.550 align:middle line:90% and retaliation. 01:21:07.550 --> 01:21:11.810 align:middle line:84% I don't think anyone today has been silenced or not heard. 01:21:11.810 --> 01:21:15.740 align:middle line:84% I believe what we are hearing is that request and changes that 01:21:15.740 --> 01:21:19.400 align:middle line:84% are being made are not pertinent to what is before us. 01:21:19.400 --> 01:21:22.160 align:middle line:84% I do believe there's a lot of opportunity for discussion 01:21:22.160 --> 01:21:23.867 align:middle line:84% moving forward to look at employment 01:21:23.867 --> 01:21:25.700 align:middle line:84% and to look at discrimination and harassment 01:21:25.700 --> 01:21:29.000 align:middle line:84% in all of its forms, and I suspect that we will, 01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:30.230 align:middle line:90% moving forward. 01:21:30.230 --> 01:21:34.572 align:middle line:84% What we do have here today, Madam Speaker, is a very-- 01:21:34.572 --> 01:21:36.490 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 01:21:36.490 --> 01:21:39.640 align:middle line:84% Chair apologizes to the gentlelady at the microphone. 01:21:39.640 --> 01:21:42.736 align:middle line:84% For what purpose does the lady rise? 01:21:42.736 --> 01:21:45.510 align:middle line:90% I would like to [INAUDIBLE]. 01:21:45.510 --> 01:21:46.980 align:middle line:90% Does the lady yield? 01:21:46.980 --> 01:21:48.900 align:middle line:90% I do not at this time. 01:21:48.900 --> 01:21:50.070 align:middle line:90% Sorry. 01:21:50.070 --> 01:21:54.240 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Ms. Decker of Cambridge. 01:21:54.240 --> 01:21:56.400 align:middle line:84% I am speaking on the consolidated amendment. 01:21:56.400 --> 01:21:59.010 align:middle line:84% And my hope is that it will be supported and voted 01:21:59.010 --> 01:22:00.570 align:middle line:90% on today favorably. 01:22:00.570 --> 01:22:03.640 align:middle line:84% I do believe that from today, moving forward, 01:22:03.640 --> 01:22:07.830 align:middle line:84% there is a very clear agenda and there are very clear messages 01:22:07.830 --> 01:22:08.880 align:middle line:90% being sent out. 01:22:08.880 --> 01:22:11.700 align:middle line:84% Sexual harassment will not be tolerated 01:22:11.700 --> 01:22:14.940 align:middle line:84% by anyone in this chamber or in this building. 01:22:14.940 --> 01:22:16.620 align:middle line:84% There are incredible paths that have 01:22:16.620 --> 01:22:20.820 align:middle line:84% been created that will allow people to file complaints. 01:22:20.820 --> 01:22:22.770 align:middle line:84% We are empowering victims who have 01:22:22.770 --> 01:22:26.520 align:middle line:84% been harassed who would like a nondisclosure agreement that 01:22:26.520 --> 01:22:29.370 align:middle line:84% empowers them to come forward and allows them to believe they 01:22:29.370 --> 01:22:31.860 align:middle line:84% do have the confidentiality to speak 01:22:31.860 --> 01:22:34.494 align:middle line:84% about the claims and the harassment 01:22:34.494 --> 01:22:36.660 align:middle line:84% that they have been-- they have experienced and been 01:22:36.660 --> 01:22:38.400 align:middle line:90% victimized. 01:22:38.400 --> 01:22:42.660 align:middle line:84% I stand here today feeling really good about the changes 01:22:42.660 --> 01:22:43.860 align:middle line:90% that are moving forward. 01:22:43.860 --> 01:22:46.290 align:middle line:84% And I think the message has been sent loud and clear. 01:22:46.290 --> 01:22:47.400 align:middle line:90% I will say it again. 01:22:47.400 --> 01:22:48.780 align:middle line:90% Time is up. 01:22:48.780 --> 01:22:50.910 align:middle line:84% And we know it's up if you read what's in this bill 01:22:50.910 --> 01:22:52.451 align:middle line:84% and you look at all the rules changes 01:22:52.451 --> 01:22:53.700 align:middle line:90% that we are about to adopt. 01:22:53.700 --> 01:22:56.490 align:middle line:84% Madam Chair, Madam Speaker, I ask 01:22:56.490 --> 01:23:00.189 align:middle line:84% that we make favorable that we-- when there is a vote, 01:23:00.189 --> 01:23:02.355 align:middle line:84% it be called with the roll of the yeas and the nays. 01:23:02.355 --> 01:23:04.950 align:middle line:90% 01:23:04.950 --> 01:23:08.279 align:middle line:84% The yeas and nays are required on a consolidated amendment. 01:23:08.279 --> 01:23:08.820 align:middle line:90% So thank you. 01:23:08.820 --> 01:23:10.900 align:middle line:84% Chair recognizes Mr. Diehl of Whitman. 01:23:10.900 --> 01:23:34.960 align:middle line:90% 01:23:34.960 --> 01:23:37.430 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:23:37.430 --> 01:23:39.800 align:middle line:84% And thank you to the gentlelady of Methuen. 01:23:39.800 --> 01:23:42.350 align:middle line:84% If my daughters ever follow in my footsteps, 01:23:42.350 --> 01:23:45.170 align:middle line:84% I want you to be the role model that they look to 01:23:45.170 --> 01:23:47.780 align:middle line:84% for courage, integrity, and conviction in this chamber. 01:23:47.780 --> 01:23:51.770 align:middle line:84% Thank you for your speaking today on this matter. 01:23:51.770 --> 01:23:53.540 align:middle line:84% Thank you, Madam Speaker, for allowing 01:23:53.540 --> 01:23:56.325 align:middle line:84% me to speak on the important consolidated amendment 01:23:56.325 --> 01:23:58.700 align:middle line:84% and for allowing the adopted language, which is partially 01:23:58.700 --> 01:24:02.270 align:middle line:84% drawn from HR 4924, which Congress recently 01:24:02.270 --> 01:24:05.390 align:middle line:84% passed with overwhelming bipartisan support 01:24:05.390 --> 01:24:07.460 align:middle line:84% down in DC and the House, broadly 01:24:07.460 --> 01:24:10.250 align:middle line:84% reforming congressional payouts for harassment 01:24:10.250 --> 01:24:11.690 align:middle line:90% committed by members. 01:24:11.690 --> 01:24:13.880 align:middle line:84% Within that bill, there was an elimination 01:24:13.880 --> 01:24:16.340 align:middle line:84% of taxpayer-funded settlements to victims, 01:24:16.340 --> 01:24:20.360 align:middle line:84% placing the burden correctly on the offending lawmaker. 01:24:20.360 --> 01:24:24.110 align:middle line:84% This amendment goes a long way in restoring accountability 01:24:24.110 --> 01:24:26.540 align:middle line:84% and integrity here at the State House. 01:24:26.540 --> 01:24:28.490 align:middle line:84% It will hold taxpayers harmless when 01:24:28.490 --> 01:24:31.539 align:middle line:84% there are potential sexual harassment settlements. 01:24:31.539 --> 01:24:33.080 align:middle line:84% As we know, over the last five years, 01:24:33.080 --> 01:24:35.300 align:middle line:84% taxpayers have had to fund the legal fees 01:24:35.300 --> 01:24:39.260 align:middle line:84% for cases related to several members of the legislature. 01:24:39.260 --> 01:24:41.180 align:middle line:84% During this time period, three different cases 01:24:41.180 --> 01:24:44.551 align:middle line:84% have ultimately cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands 01:24:44.551 --> 01:24:45.050 align:middle line:90% of dollars. 01:24:45.050 --> 01:24:48.020 align:middle line:84% This amendment shows the people of Massachusetts 01:24:48.020 --> 01:24:50.210 align:middle line:84% that we are going to hold the House and Senate 01:24:50.210 --> 01:24:51.980 align:middle line:84% members accountable for their actions 01:24:51.980 --> 01:24:55.080 align:middle line:84% and that sexual harassment is not acceptable in any way, 01:24:55.080 --> 01:24:56.760 align:middle line:90% shape or form. 01:24:56.760 --> 01:24:58.910 align:middle line:84% The goal of today's bill is to set new guidelines 01:24:58.910 --> 01:25:02.510 align:middle line:84% to proactively prevent future sexual harassment of any kind 01:25:02.510 --> 01:25:04.280 align:middle line:84% from happening here on Beacon Hill. 01:25:04.280 --> 01:25:05.960 align:middle line:84% And by accepting this amendment, we 01:25:05.960 --> 01:25:08.330 align:middle line:84% are showing our commitment and determination 01:25:08.330 --> 01:25:10.610 align:middle line:84% to providing a harassment-free workplace. 01:25:10.610 --> 01:25:12.240 align:middle line:90% Thank you, Madam Speaker. 01:25:12.240 --> 01:25:12.740 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 01:25:12.740 --> 01:25:16.362 align:middle line:84% Roll call having been ordered and will be called forthwith, 01:25:16.362 --> 01:25:18.320 align:middle line:84% court officers will please summons the members. 01:25:18.320 --> 01:25:20.330 align:middle line:84% Indicate to them that a roll call is in progress 01:25:20.330 --> 01:25:21.954 align:middle line:84% and will remain open for three minutes. 01:25:21.954 --> 01:29:51.330 align:middle line:90% 01:29:51.330 --> 01:29:54.480 align:middle line:84% Have all members voted who wish to do so? 01:29:54.480 --> 01:29:55.980 align:middle line:90% Time for voting has expired. 01:29:55.980 --> 01:29:59.890 align:middle line:84% In this matter, 153 have indicated in the affirmative, 01:29:59.890 --> 01:30:01.960 align:middle line:90% none in the negative. 01:30:01.960 --> 01:30:03.705 align:middle line:84% The consolidated amendment is adopted. 01:30:03.705 --> 01:30:06.330 align:middle line:90% 01:30:06.330 --> 01:30:09.330 align:middle line:84% The chair would like, to at this time, 01:30:09.330 --> 01:30:13.050 align:middle line:84% congratulate one of our members, as tomorrow is his birthday 01:30:13.050 --> 01:30:14.430 align:middle line:90% and we will not be here. 01:30:14.430 --> 01:30:18.570 align:middle line:84% So join me in congratulating Representative Petrolati 01:30:18.570 --> 01:30:21.419 align:middle line:90% on his birthday. 01:30:21.419 --> 01:30:24.870 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 01:30:24.870 --> 01:30:47.600 align:middle line:90% 01:30:47.600 --> 01:30:52.020 align:middle line:84% So a question comes on adoption of the order pending, which 01:30:52.020 --> 01:30:55.817 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville offers an amendment 01:30:55.817 --> 01:30:56.900 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:30:56.900 --> 01:30:58.446 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:30:58.446 --> 01:31:03.110 align:middle line:90% 01:31:03.110 --> 01:31:04.527 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 4-- 01:31:04.527 --> 01:31:07.110 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville moves to amend the order in proposed 01:31:07.110 --> 01:31:11.570 align:middle line:84% rule [? 94A(2) ?] to add after the last sentence of the first 01:31:11.570 --> 01:31:13.592 align:middle line:84% paragraph, "Such assessment shall be"-- 01:31:13.592 --> 01:31:15.050 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:31:15.050 --> 01:31:16.890 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading of the amendment. 01:31:16.890 --> 01:31:18.000 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:18.708 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:31:18.708 --> 01:31:20.930 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:31:20.930 --> 01:31:22.680 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:31:22.680 --> 01:31:23.388 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:31:23.388 --> 01:31:24.830 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:31:24.830 --> 01:31:27.890 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville offers an amendment 01:31:27.890 --> 01:31:29.008 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:31:29.008 --> 01:31:30.442 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:31:30.442 --> 01:31:34.750 align:middle line:90% 01:31:34.750 --> 01:31:35.807 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 5-- 01:31:35.807 --> 01:31:38.390 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville moves to amend the order of proposed 01:31:38.390 --> 01:31:42.602 align:middle line:84% rule [? 88B, ?] paragraph 4, [INAUDIBLE] amend to read-- 01:31:42.602 --> 01:31:44.060 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:31:44.060 --> 01:31:45.940 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading in the amendment. 01:31:45.940 --> 01:31:47.220 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:31:47.220 --> 01:31:47.928 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:31:47.928 --> 01:31:50.390 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:31:50.390 --> 01:31:52.140 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:31:52.140 --> 01:31:52.848 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:31:52.848 --> 01:31:54.380 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:31:54.380 --> 01:31:56.630 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville offers an amendment 01:31:56.630 --> 01:31:57.252 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:31:57.252 --> 01:31:58.668 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:31:58.668 --> 01:32:02.410 align:middle line:90% 01:32:02.410 --> 01:32:03.770 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 6-- 01:32:03.770 --> 01:32:06.580 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville moves of the order in proposed rule 01:32:06.580 --> 01:32:09.910 align:middle line:84% [? 94C ?] by adding the following. 01:32:09.910 --> 01:32:13.630 align:middle line:84% If the EEO officer believes that interim measures 01:32:13.630 --> 01:32:14.842 align:middle line:90% are warranted-- 01:32:14.842 --> 01:32:16.300 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:32:16.300 --> 01:32:18.220 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading of the amendment. 01:32:18.220 --> 01:32:19.240 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:32:19.240 --> 01:32:20.025 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:32:20.025 --> 01:32:22.060 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:32:22.060 --> 01:32:23.810 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:32:23.810 --> 01:32:24.500 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:32:24.500 --> 01:32:25.541 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:32:25.541 --> 01:32:35.180 align:middle line:90% 01:32:35.180 --> 01:32:37.797 align:middle line:84% Ms. Provost of Somerville offers an amendment 01:32:37.797 --> 01:32:38.880 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:32:38.880 --> 01:32:40.302 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:32:40.302 --> 01:32:44.000 align:middle line:90% 01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:46.970 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 7-- Ms. Provost of Somerville moves to amend 01:32:46.970 --> 01:32:51.449 align:middle line:84% the order in proposed rule [? 90D(4) ?] to delete 01:32:51.449 --> 01:32:53.740 align:middle line:84% the period after employment and substitute the phrase-- 01:32:53.740 --> 01:32:55.180 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:32:55.180 --> 01:32:57.120 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading in the amendment. 01:32:57.120 --> 01:32:58.370 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:32:58.370 --> 01:32:59.430 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:32:59.430 --> 01:33:01.330 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:33:01.330 --> 01:33:03.112 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:33:03.112 --> 01:33:03.820 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:33:03.820 --> 01:33:06.177 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:33:06.177 --> 01:33:07.510 align:middle line:90% House will be in a brief recess. 01:33:07.510 --> 01:33:19.294 align:middle line:90% 01:33:19.294 --> 01:33:22.731 align:middle line:90% [MUSIC PLAYING] 01:33:22.731 --> 01:33:27.650 align:middle line:90% 01:33:27.650 --> 01:33:29.370 align:middle line:90% House will come to order. 01:33:29.370 --> 01:33:31.937 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker of Cambridge office a technical amendment 01:33:31.937 --> 01:33:33.020 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:33:33.020 --> 01:33:34.393 align:middle line:90% Clerk will read the amendment. 01:33:34.393 --> 01:33:38.100 align:middle line:90% 01:33:38.100 --> 01:33:39.970 align:middle line:90% Amendment number 8, as changed-- 01:33:39.970 --> 01:33:43.120 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker of Cambridge moves to amend the order by striking out 01:33:43.120 --> 01:33:44.620 align:middle line:84% in line five the word "definitions," 01:33:44.620 --> 01:33:46.512 align:middle line:90% by striking out in line 46-- 01:33:46.512 --> 01:33:47.970 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:33:47.970 --> 01:33:49.780 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading of the amendment. 01:33:49.780 --> 01:33:51.060 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:33:51.060 --> 01:33:53.312 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:33:53.312 --> 01:33:54.645 align:middle line:90% House will be in a brief recess. 01:33:54.645 --> 01:34:05.232 align:middle line:90% 01:34:05.232 --> 01:34:08.676 align:middle line:90% [MUSIC PLAYING] 01:34:08.676 --> 01:34:26.440 align:middle line:90% 01:34:26.440 --> 01:34:29.000 align:middle line:90% House will come to order. 01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:33.650 align:middle line:84% The clerk will reread the amendment submitted 01:34:33.650 --> 01:34:36.110 align:middle line:90% by Ms. Decker with the change. 01:34:36.110 --> 01:34:39.440 align:middle line:84% Amendment number 8, as changed in rule 100, 01:34:39.440 --> 01:34:42.149 align:middle line:84% as amended in subsection E, and by striking out the words 01:34:42.149 --> 01:34:44.690 align:middle line:84% "a party to an agreement," and inserting in place [INAUDIBLE] 01:34:44.690 --> 01:34:47.870 align:middle line:84% the words, "the party described in paragraph number 1 above, 01:34:47.870 --> 01:34:49.090 align:middle line:90% or the complaint." 01:34:49.090 --> 01:34:53.122 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker of Cambridge moves that the order be amended. 01:34:53.122 --> 01:34:54.580 align:middle line:84% If there be no objection, the clerk 01:34:54.580 --> 01:34:56.450 align:middle line:84% will dispense with the further reading of the amendment. 01:34:56.450 --> 01:34:57.560 align:middle line:90% Does the chair hear objection? 01:34:57.560 --> 01:34:58.268 align:middle line:90% Chair hears none. 01:34:58.268 --> 01:35:00.750 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:35:00.750 --> 01:35:02.610 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:35:02.610 --> 01:35:03.702 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:35:03.702 --> 01:35:04.743 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:35:04.743 --> 01:35:08.430 align:middle line:90% 01:35:08.430 --> 01:35:10.390 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 01:35:10.390 --> 01:35:12.300 align:middle line:84% Roll call having been ordered, roll call 01:35:12.300 --> 01:35:14.910 align:middle line:84% will be called forthwith and remain open for three minutes. 01:35:14.910 --> 01:37:20.420 align:middle line:90% 01:37:20.420 --> 01:37:23.870 align:middle line:84% Chair would inform the members that we do not anticipate 01:37:23.870 --> 01:37:25.205 align:middle line:90% any further roll calls. 01:37:25.205 --> 01:41:59.800 align:middle line:90% 01:41:59.800 --> 01:42:03.980 align:middle line:84% Have all members voted who wish to do so? 01:42:03.980 --> 01:42:05.460 align:middle line:90% Time for voting has expired. 01:42:05.460 --> 01:42:07.110 align:middle line:84% The clerk will display the tally. 01:42:07.110 --> 01:42:10.371 align:middle line:84% In this matter, 151 have voted in the affirmative and none 01:42:10.371 --> 01:42:11.037 align:middle line:90% in the negative. 01:42:11.037 --> 01:42:12.468 align:middle line:90% The order is adopted. 01:42:12.468 --> 01:42:19.630 align:middle line:90% 01:42:19.630 --> 01:42:23.630 align:middle line:84% Chair has been informed that House 4298, an act designating 01:42:23.630 --> 01:42:26.120 align:middle line:84% a certain park in the city of Quincy 01:42:26.120 --> 01:42:30.320 align:middle line:84% as the Richard "Dick" Herbert Memorial Park, 01:42:30.320 --> 01:42:33.260 align:middle line:84% comes before us for final passage. 01:42:33.260 --> 01:42:37.400 align:middle line:84% Under the Constitution, a separate vote is required. 01:42:37.400 --> 01:42:42.560 align:middle line:84% Those in favor of the emergency preamble will please stand. 01:42:42.560 --> 01:42:44.570 align:middle line:84% And the monitors will return the count. 01:42:44.570 --> 01:42:47.670 align:middle line:90% First division-- 4. 01:42:47.670 --> 01:42:51.890 align:middle line:90% Second division-- 2. 01:42:51.890 --> 01:42:54.850 align:middle line:90% Third division-- 6. 01:42:54.850 --> 01:42:58.040 align:middle line:90% Fourth division-- 3. 01:42:58.040 --> 01:43:01.730 align:middle line:84% Those opposed-- first division, 0; second division, 0; 01:43:01.730 --> 01:43:04.900 align:middle line:84% third division, 0; fourth division, 0. 01:43:04.900 --> 01:43:08.720 align:middle line:84% 15 members having indicated in the affirmative, 01:43:08.720 --> 01:43:10.520 align:middle line:84% the emergency preamble is adopted. 01:43:10.520 --> 01:43:13.337 align:middle line:90% 01:43:13.337 --> 01:43:15.170 align:middle line:84% House has been-- the chair has been informed 01:43:15.170 --> 01:43:19.100 align:middle line:84% that Senate 2251, an act establishing a sick leave 01:43:19.100 --> 01:43:22.835 align:middle line:84% bank for Linda Thernize-Williams, an employee 01:43:22.835 --> 01:43:24.710 align:middle line:84% of the Department of Transitional Assistance, 01:43:24.710 --> 01:43:27.230 align:middle line:84% comes before us for final passage. 01:43:27.230 --> 01:43:29.130 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:43:29.130 --> 01:43:29.910 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:43:29.910 --> 01:43:33.562 align:middle line:84% The bill is passed to be enacted. 01:43:33.562 --> 01:43:35.044 align:middle line:90% House will be in a brief recess. 01:43:35.044 --> 01:44:13.140 align:middle line:90% 01:44:13.140 --> 01:44:19.670 align:middle line:84% Ms. Benson of Lunenburg moves suspension of rule 47 01:44:19.670 --> 01:44:24.500 align:middle line:84% to take up calendar item 275 on page 19. 01:44:24.500 --> 01:44:26.410 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:44:26.410 --> 01:44:27.320 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:44:27.320 --> 01:44:29.472 align:middle line:90% Rule 47 is suspended. 01:44:29.472 --> 01:44:30.888 align:middle line:90% Third reading of the bill-- 01:44:30.888 --> 01:44:35.620 align:middle line:90% 01:44:35.620 --> 01:44:38.830 align:middle line:84% Act establishing the position of town manager 01:44:38.830 --> 01:44:39.750 align:middle line:90% in the town of Ayer. 01:44:39.750 --> 01:44:43.340 align:middle line:90% 01:44:43.340 --> 01:44:45.650 align:middle line:84% Question comes on passing the bill [INAUDIBLE] 01:44:45.650 --> 01:44:47.384 align:middle line:84% pending, which Mr. Speliotis of Danvers 01:44:47.384 --> 01:44:49.300 align:middle line:84% offers an amendment in the hands of the clerk. 01:44:49.300 --> 01:44:50.716 align:middle line:84% The clerk will read the amendment. 01:44:50.716 --> 01:44:54.400 align:middle line:90% 01:44:54.400 --> 01:44:56.680 align:middle line:84% Mr. Speliotis of Danvers moves to amend the bill 01:44:56.680 --> 01:44:59.500 align:middle line:84% by adding the following section, section 6. 01:44:59.500 --> 01:45:03.017 align:middle line:84% This act shall take effect upon its passage. 01:45:03.017 --> 01:45:04.850 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the amendment. 01:45:04.850 --> 01:45:06.500 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:45:06.500 --> 01:45:07.208 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:45:07.208 --> 01:45:08.970 align:middle line:90% The amendment is adopted. 01:45:08.970 --> 01:45:11.320 align:middle line:84% Question now comes on passing the bill to be engrossed. 01:45:11.320 --> 01:45:13.100 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:45:13.100 --> 01:45:14.067 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:45:14.067 --> 01:45:15.558 align:middle line:84% The bill is passed to be engrossed. 01:45:15.558 --> 01:45:56.330 align:middle line:90% 01:45:56.330 --> 01:45:59.120 align:middle line:84% A message from His Excellency, the governor, 01:45:59.120 --> 01:46:01.730 align:middle line:84% recommending legislation to enhance the background 01:46:01.730 --> 01:46:04.880 align:middle line:84% record check procedures of the Department of Early 01:46:04.880 --> 01:46:08.180 align:middle line:84% Education and Care, House number 4310, 01:46:08.180 --> 01:46:11.750 align:middle line:84% was filed in the Office of the Clerk yesterday at 11:58 AM. 01:46:11.750 --> 01:46:15.600 align:middle line:90% 01:46:15.600 --> 01:46:18.150 align:middle line:84% Message will be referred to the Committee on the Judiciary-- 01:46:18.150 --> 01:46:21.330 align:middle line:90% 01:46:21.330 --> 01:46:22.678 align:middle line:90% report of a committee. 01:46:22.678 --> 01:46:33.920 align:middle line:90% 01:46:33.920 --> 01:46:38.550 align:middle line:84% The Committee on Rules reports recommending that the order 01:46:38.550 --> 01:46:40.550 align:middle line:84% relative to authorizing the counsel to the House 01:46:40.550 --> 01:46:44.010 align:middle line:84% of Representatives to contract with an outside third-party 01:46:44.010 --> 01:46:47.400 align:middle line:84% vendor to conduct a series of comprehensive surveys 01:46:47.400 --> 01:46:49.830 align:middle line:84% of appointed officers and employees of the House, 01:46:49.830 --> 01:46:51.572 align:middle line:90% House number 4296-- 01:46:51.572 --> 01:46:54.030 align:middle line:84% the Committee on Rules requests recommending that the order 01:46:54.030 --> 01:46:55.200 align:middle line:90% ought to be adopt-- 01:46:55.200 --> 01:47:00.050 align:middle line:90% 01:47:00.050 --> 01:47:02.480 align:middle line:84% Ms. Decker of Cambridge moves suspension of the rules. 01:47:02.480 --> 01:47:04.230 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:47:04.230 --> 01:47:04.938 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:47:04.938 --> 01:47:08.294 align:middle line:90% The rules are suspended. 01:47:08.294 --> 01:47:09.960 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 01:47:09.960 --> 01:47:11.782 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:47:11.782 --> 01:47:12.490 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:47:12.490 --> 01:47:13.365 align:middle line:90% The order is adopted. 01:47:13.365 --> 01:47:24.580 align:middle line:90% 01:47:24.580 --> 01:47:26.287 align:middle line:84% Mr. DeLeo of Winthrop offers an order 01:47:26.287 --> 01:47:27.370 align:middle line:90% in the hands of the clerk. 01:47:27.370 --> 01:47:29.380 align:middle line:90% The clerk will read the order. 01:47:29.380 --> 01:47:31.088 align:middle line:84% Order that when the House adjourns today, 01:47:31.088 --> 01:47:33.250 align:middle line:84% it adjourned to meet on Monday next at 11:00 AM. 01:47:33.250 --> 01:47:36.740 align:middle line:90% 01:47:36.740 --> 01:47:38.450 align:middle line:84% Question comes on adoption of the order. 01:47:38.450 --> 01:47:40.320 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:47:40.320 --> 01:47:41.040 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:47:41.040 --> 01:47:42.500 align:middle line:90% The order is adopted. 01:47:42.500 --> 01:47:47.030 align:middle line:84% Mr. Vieira of Sandwich, Falmouth-- 01:47:47.030 --> 01:47:50.630 align:middle line:84% Mr. Vieira of Falmouth moves that we now stand adjourned. 01:47:50.630 --> 01:47:52.560 align:middle line:84% All those in favor, say aye-- opposed, no. 01:47:52.560 --> 01:47:53.760 align:middle line:90% The ayes have it. 01:47:53.760 --> 01:47:55.820 align:middle line:84% The House now stands adjourned to meet Monday 01:47:55.820 --> 01:47:57.410 align:middle line:90% next in an informal session. 01:47:57.410 --> 01:48:17.869 align:middle line:90% 01:48:17.869 --> 01:48:22.612 align:middle line:90% [MUSIC PLAYING] 01:48:22.612 --> 01:50:55.574 align:middle line:90%